The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - September 3, 1986 (112)APPROVAL, OF AMENDED 1985-86 TDA CLAIM O *LTNCIL COIAIi11UNICATIO,> , PREPARM BY: Assistant City Manager RwcbmENDED ACTION: That the City Council approve an amended 1985-86 TDA; claim. In this claim the City is requesting that $47,971 be reprogrammed from streets & Roads to Transit, and we are also claiming $20,724 of unclaimed STA apportionment. BACYGROUND INMFMp,TION: Our 1985-86 claim projected 62,000 Dial -A -Ride trips. The -actual ridership, not including Woodbridge passengers, was 68,599. The claim also included funds for l new vehicle and we we actually replaced four. - These two factors have caused us to exceed our estimates for the year. ,.a Council is again reminded that transit does have first claim on TDA funds. Respectfully sLiUdtted, erry L/. Glenn Assistant City Manager JLG/br COUNCO76 r RESOLUTION NO. 86-138 - RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED 1985-86 TRANSITASSISTANCE CLAIM RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby approve the amended 1985-86 Transit Assistance Claim, a copy of which is attached hereto, identified as'Exhibit "A" and thereby made a part hereof. _ BE`IT FURTHER. RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the subject docents on behalf of the City of Lodi._' 4 Dated: September 3, 1986 t C I hereby certify that Resolution No. 66-138 was passed and adopted by ,the City.Council of the City of Lodi in a Regular Meeting held September 3, 1986 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - FIinchman, Olson, Pinkerton, and Reid (Mayor) Does: Council Members - None a Absent: Council Members - Snider 3=.; Abstain: Council Members - None L�it.cc1 � �y "Ch�CKt./ ALICE M. REIMC1E City Clerk i 86-138 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS a I. Lecal Transportation Fund Available Apportionment" A. Area Apportionment 1985-86 $ 6J710Z1 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 14 02 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed, Apportionment 60 60 D. Unexpended Carryover 41 0 E. Total Available for 1985-86 Claim(s) - 1,093,051 F. less any LTF Already Claimed 1935-66 1,093,051 G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS.CLAIM $ -0- 11., State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1985-86 $x62_485 B. Special Transit Apportionment 1985-86" 789 C. x4>.oaxa 1985-86 Unclaimed Apportionment 20?724__ D. Unexpended Carryover s E. ' Total Available for 1985-86 Claims) 93,859 _ F. less any STA Already Claimed 1985-86 _ 73L1_35-__,_ G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 20,724 -7= TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS � Claim Purocse I. LTF II. STA* I. Public Transporta tion ' :Article 4 (99260) -Operator Article 8 (99400(c.)) -Contractor F II. Pedestrian and Bicycle N/A Article._3 (99234) Article 8 (99400(a)) 38,565 ------- III. Roads and Streets Article 8 (99400(a)) 934,988 IV. Other N/A Article 8 (99400(b) or 99400(4)). - - - ---- - 1. TOTAL THIS CLAIM ` $47,971 is being -reprogrammed from Streets & Roads to Transit _ a'. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM - 1,093,051 93.859 h TOTkL THIS CLA71.1 19093,051 c. UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT 00 1985-86 (a - b) 1985-36 -- --- - -- ------ *This will automatically be classified as Article 6.5 (99313.3) s- for purposes of the Act. IMPORTANT: Please identify any unexpended carryover included i.� the amounts being claimed above. -8- - III. OPERATING EXPENSES 1984-85 1985=86 Actual >=xZ)D sa)M Budget Revised 501. Labor Operators Salaries/1-7ages 1S9 85 Other Salaries/Wages 58 31 502 Fringe Benefits 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubriconts Tires/Tubes Other Vehicle & Radio Rerci r 1,693 505 Utilities' 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 6,000 4,004 5!37 Taxes ` 745 508 Purchased Transportation Service _1-75,293 204,780 509 Miscellaneous Expenses _ 723 709 4 510 Expense Transfers Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 -Depreciation/Amortization Operator. Funds Grant Funds TOTAL 182,978 211,302 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles 23,187 -39,459 Construction Other Radios 765 720 TOTAL. 23,952 4o,179 ' *Please circle either "actual" or "estimate", as appropriate. **For purchase of three new gasoline powered vehicles. See page 13. 1 , —10" 'i ysv. OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* -" Actual Estimated' Actual' FY 1983-84 FY I9$4-85 FY 2985-86 L. Patronage a. Total Passengers 61,755 58,869 70,480 - = ' b. Revenue Passengers 1,877 1,045 2,745 c. Youth Passengers...: d. Elderly Passengers 59,878 57,824 65,854 e. Handicapped Passengers' 2. Vehicle Miles.** a. Total Vehicle Miles 106,140 107,869 "107,971 1 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 106,140 107,869 -107,971 3. Revenue vehicle Hours 9,448 9.342 9,042 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel 1 Consumption s- r' a. Diesel 8,104 _ 8,194 5,437 b. Gasoline 3,497.': c. Liquid Natural Compressed: Gas 5. Fare Structure a. Base 2.00 2.00 b. Zone c. Youth. d. Senior .50 .50 •50 - e. Handicapped .50 .50 .50 f. Monthly Pass g. Other h. Average Fare 54 .54 .55 *There are no County passengers includeT in.t ese totals. **Includes miles for.County service. All other figures' reflect City service only. k. *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter iption or complete descr., M1THREF. .YEAR FISCAT, PLAN 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 OperatingExpenses $ 213,355 $ -219,755 $ 226,350 a Operating Revenues ,i Sources: LTF $ 170,050 $ - 175,130 $ 180,410 STA Federal Fares 36,550 _ 37,645 38,775 General Fund Other 6,755 -6,980 7,165 i Total $ 213,355 $ -2191-155 $ 226,350 `t s Capital Expenses $ 27,000 $ -0-_ $ --0- Capital Revenue Sources: LTF $ 27,000 $ -0- $ -0- STA Federal Other Total $ 27,000 $ -0- $ -0- -12 - ...ar+W..?'.wsrr it ..�X d'K¢.�.n Ar.+✓.?_ ^M i ",.'�{S. _ FLEET INVENTORY ( Article .4 Opera for Only) , - Productionj # ofl Fuell Seat ISpecial Features 'Hake & ModeliYear i Veh.! Type+ Capacity IAC IEP (63C (Other 11982 Chev: (Station Wagon j 1982 1 2 iDiesel1 6 ! x i I I 11985 Chev. ! Station Wagoni I 1985 5 I i asolinel I 6 I I 1 x i I ! I I I I i f I I i 4 ' � _ 1 i i I• i i 1 i I i i I ! i I i I i• I - �_ �ro xxxxxxxxxxx TX --- '-�`�' f ! rAL Vehicles tc be Purchased in FY 1986-87 - I I Station Wagon i 1986 1 1 I 2 j asoll n i 6 1 x I I I I I I I I I I I a I _ AC = Air Conditioned i install _ ``It may be feasible to purchase and EP = Environmental Package two new gasoline engines rather than purchase WC = Wheelchair Lift two entirely new vehicles; 1986-87 TAS, Claim will address this. —13- � s r iv. Has'this-system been innon-compliance with its requiredd localsupport ratio? No =' ` 1F I€ yes, identify the year or years: 3. Extension of Service An extension or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: _ A. The extension of.service has been in operation for less than two years at the ,end of the fiscal year. B. The 'claimant's operating cost for the fiscal year, after excluding the operating cost of, the extension of service, exceeds its operating cost for the 'prior fiscal year: C. The claimant submits a report on the extension of service to COG. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(c)).` i. Is this a new service? ii. Is there an extension of service being claimed? - I€ soy please identify the extension of service: 4. Fifteen Percent. F.xp=anditure •Increase If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous dear's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. - 5. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service 'characteristics from the .`previous fiscal year. Please' attach an additional page -f necessary. Outdated; One additional vehicle was purchased in 1984-85, Saturday service was initiated will be and fares lowered for non -elderly and non -handicapped persons. These were all updated for accomplished late in the fiscal year.so it is impossible to ascertain .,the affect l.; 1986-87 TDA of service. _ A replacement vehicle is included. in,this..year's budget to continue the replace- Claim merit oU'Aiesel-powered vehicles to gasoline.! ti Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements t For contracted transporta tion service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board ;has waived the farebox'and"local support ratios as it is empowered to do and established a two-step process. g -r 1. Match Requirement To receive the same amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA, combined) that a service received in the previous year, no more than 90% of the operating funds (minus depreciation). in the budget may be TDA derived. The ten percent or more :matching funds may come from any other source available to the community as long as it is not TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger objective To receive an amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA combined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the =_ claimant' must establish a specific service objective for; the fiscal year of the claim. This specific objective must be the operating cost per passenger for the fiscal year, of the claim. The objective should be a realistic one based on: current and past system performance, but should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted. The COG Executive Board will adopt the operating cost per passenger figure that a claimant must meet in the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior, to the claim, then it: would only :.be eligible to file a claim for the level of TDA s funding received in that fiscal year. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA funding in a future fiscal year, then it should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. i. What was the level. of TDA; funding _receiv.ed: in the previous fiscal year for this 'system (LTF and STA)? ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds? - iii. Is this claim requesting more TDA funds then were received in the previous fiscal year? I€ yes, how much more? -16- iv. What. was last:;,year's Operating Cost per ,Passenger - . �� =i, i7ha twas the Objective? ,,- �" actual Operating, ,Cost per Passenger?' a. FY 1984 -85 -Operating Cost $ :- b. Total Passengers -� c. Operating' Cost Per Passenger (a ; b) $ v. What is theOperating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? d. Budgeted Operating Cost. $' :. e. Estimated Total Passengers - f. Operating' Cost per Passence:: (d e) $ g. FY 1985-86 OPERATING COST PER e PASSENGER 'OBJECTIVE $ 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase Zf -any of the lime items on the attached budget exceed by .more than 15% the :expenditure for, that same item : in the - J: previous year's budget, then an explanation :for that 'increase must' be attached..' 4. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service. characteristics from the previous :fiscal year.. Please attach an additional page if necessary. ' t r PART ,II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE'.PR03ECTS =" - - LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND � LTF,�Cost Y -Project Title. and Description Project Limits f•rTotal_ Cost *Ham Lane Street 'improvements ' Lcdi Avenue to Elm Street i $38,565 j {.::Work in progress 4 i i f J. STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND STA Cost Project Title and Description - Project Limits ;Total-Cost - { o i+'F. •7 r i ,-w"^"'✓e'^aC•rrv, 7 7 r r _ _ w PART III -~ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS ?lease provide .the"requested information for each project being identified s for Transportation:Development Act funding. LOCAL'TRANSPORTATION FUND x LTF Cost fi Project Title and Description Project Limits To�otai�-Z`ost '- Miscellaneous Widening $ 50,000 y * Miscellaneous Curb & Gutters 70,000 R.R Grade Crossing Protection @ SPP Turner.Road @ Mills i 15,000 ti Cherokee Lane = 10,000: t Washington-Street 14,000. Traffic Signals 1. Lodi `Ave. &Church St: 100,000 Hutchins & Tokay40,000" j ,. Miscellaneous Locations i 80,000 RR Xing Approach Improvements Tokay Street _ 30,000 y locust Street 47,000' Loma Drive. . _6,000. { , ►�; i Stockton Street Improvements Vine to Tokay - 262,000€. f Century Blvd/WID Box Culvert & Crossing 100,000 * Hutchins Street Improvements Rimby to Vine 58,000 Tokay to Lodi R/W 15,000 * Cherokee, Lane Improvements Lockeford-to S/Murray. 75,000 * Pavement Management ,System -5,000 Street Maintenance 128,000 } Administration/Planning 2 000 ,Page i :Aecessar y Use Adaitiona STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND STA Cost Project Title and Description Project Limits Total Cost G • Q _(11cP Ar, r?;-.-`n„�i F.Af+P "if . Necessarv) PART III - ROAD'�AND;'STREET PROJECTS Please provide ,the requested information foreach project being identified for Transportation _Development Act. funding. LOCAL :TRANSPORTATION FUND r LTF -Cost Project-Title and Description Project Limits .Total Cost _- ( Miscellaneous_'Asphalt Overlays {- { Projects 1986 I i ! $ :75,000 I ! I Turner Rd Curb, Gutter S Street I Replacement @'Lodi`Lake {' { 11,000 { Ham Lane median ! Century/Kettleman i .34,000 �.. ' I. et" Lockeford Street I Pleasant to Sacramento. ! 204,000 •1 Sacramento to Cherokee ! ( 58,000 I` i - Tokay Street I SPRR to Cherokee i ( 271,000 I i I California Street, Lockeford to ! ! I I Turner ! ( 66,000 ( I TOTAL ! $ 934.988 } I ( ( s1,926,000 r Use Additional Page if-Necessaryj STAT: TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND STA Cost . project Title and Description Project Limits Total Cost" I l I t Use Addi tional page if k Necessary -19- .ti LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND =2�. TO: SanJoaquin County Council of Governments 1860 'East Hazelton Avenue _ __. - -- Stockton ► ,CA 95235 FROM:,:Applicant: City of Lodi Address: P.O. Box 3006 Lodi CA 25241-1210 Y. :(City, Zip _ Contact Person:. Sharon B1 aufus Phone: 333-6706 r: The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes . 1971 and applicable rules and regulationsf .that its annual transportation claim be ,approved in:, -the' amount ; of$'1,102,490 for 'fiscal year 1985-86 ,. to be drawn frem' th6 Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please ` transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the: County -Au3itor Co' this. applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim an ie nancial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the bestof my knowledge, and that the - aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and -6734, f` APPROVED: { Applicant: City of Lodi San Joaquin County Council ) By: of Governments UAssittant City Manager..` { Title: For: City Manager Tcm Peterson By: { Date 19 PETER D. VERDOORN { ., Title: Executive Director Date : 19 { f STATE `PRANSIT':ASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County'Council of Governments ; 1560 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 A. FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: P.O. Box 3006, Lodi, CA, 95241-1910 ! (city, Zip) Contact Person: Sharon Blaufus Phone: 333-6706 This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of F the. Public" Utilities _ Code, hereby requests, in accordance with t Chapter, 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended,_ and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 93'859 for fiscal ,year-'1985-86 , to be drawn; from the.< State Transit Assistance trust- fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: - Purposes Amounts i Dial-A-Ride Services $93,859 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such, monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. , t �P The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund ' . , Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate'to.the best of my knowledge,.and'that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility. of :this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. `'• APPROVED: Applicant: City of Lodi i San Joaquin County Council ' By: of: Governments Assistant City Manager ( Title: For: City Manager Tcm Peterson By; E Date : _ q! y 19 .PETER D. VERDOORN 3 Title: Executive Director Date: 19 I TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPt1ENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1985-86 $ 6 _.. B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment __,607 D. Unexpended Carryover 41 0 t. E. Total Available for 1985-86 Claim(s) 1,093,051 F. less any LTF Already Claimed 1985-86 1,093,051 G. TOTAL °AVAILABLE' FOR THIS CLAIM $ -0- II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1985-86 $ 62,485 B. Special Transit Apportionment 1985-869,.___- C. >pA7 txa 1985-86 Unclaimed Apportionment 20L724 _ D. Unexpended Carryover 9L861 E. Total Available for 1985-86 claim(s) 93,859 F. less any. STA Already Claimed 1985-86 '' G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 20.724 i - t s a< "TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENTACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I.. LTF II STA* j I. Public: Transportation Article 4 (99260) -Operator 119 498 Article 8 (99400(c)) -Contractor II. Pedestrian and Bicycle N/A Article 3 (99234) - -- _ 13 Article:8 (99400(a)) 38 565-- 1 .. III. Roads and Streets Article 8 (99400(x)) 934,988 .._ ----- IV. Other :. N/A Article(99400(b) or .8 TOTAL THIS CLAIt4 1 093,051 93,859 4 $ 7, 971 i s be i ng reprogrammed from Streets ,6 $47,971 Roads `to Transit • � a. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM 1,093,051 93,859 T ` b. TOTAL THIS CLAIM 1,093051 - 8 c. UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT 1985-86 (a - b) - -- - — -- *This will automatically be classified as Article 6.5 (99313.3) for purposes of the Act. IMPORTANT: Please identify any unexpended carryover included in The amounts being claimed above. PART I -`PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Please Circle either: Article 4 operator or-Article 8 contractor FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1984-85 1985-86 I. OPERATING REVENUE Actual aXx>a5 tkwmtse* Budget Revised 401 Passenger Fares 30,539 37.853 402 Special Transit Fares (Woodbridge) 403 School Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 .Auxilliary`Transportation Revenues 407 Non-Transportation Revenues 408 Taxes Levied Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 54, `.39 72,319 410 Local Special Fare Assistance _ =" 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements " (Specify) State Transit Assistance Fund (STA) 107,761 93,859 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements .. (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services 440 (Specify) Interest 271 TOTAL 192, 839 211,302 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions . (Specify) State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 26,000 40,133-- Non-Governmental Donations _TOTAL 26,000- 40,179 -9- F m- III., OPERATING EXPENSES 1984=851985-86 Actua1,x=xv,qtxi�a2jt6* Budget Revised, :� 5I0 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 , Leasesand Rentals 501 Labor ` operators Salaries/Wages 85 F v Other Salaries/Wages - 5g 3i 502 Fringe Benefits 211 , 302 IV.• CAPITAL EXPENSES _ 503 Services. Debt Service x 504 Materials/Supplies Land/Property Acquisition MIE 23,187 " Fuels/Lubricants F Construction Tires/Tubes Other Radios i 7 20 .tomNA f Other Vehicle & Radio Repair 23,952 40,179 '.; 505` Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 6,0004.004 r - *Please circle either "actual" or "estimate", as appropriate. 507 Taxes 745 ' 508 Purchased Transportation Service 204,780 _175,293 509 Miscellaneous Expenses —723 709 5I0 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 , Leasesand Rentals f 513 Depreciation/Amortization ` Operator Funds Grant Funds TOTAL 182,978 211 , 302 IV.• CAPITAL EXPENSES tr Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles` 23,187 " X92459 F Construction �E = s = Other Radios 6 765 7 20 .tomNA f TOTAL. 23,952 40,179 r - *Please circle either "actual" or "estimate", as appropriate. **For Durchase of three new gasoline. powered vehicles. See page 13. f S Y = OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* - Actual Estimated Actual z FY 1983-84 FY 1984-85 FY 1985-86 1: Patronage*, t a. Total Passengers 61,755 58,869 70,480 b. Revenue ' Passengers 1,877 1,045 2,745 c. Youth Passengers d. Elderly. Passengers 59,878 57,824 65,-854 ' e. 'Handicapped Passengers 1 2. Vehicle Miles ** a. Total Vehicle Miles 106,140 107,869 107,971 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 106,140 107,869 107,971 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 9,448 9.342 9,042 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption a. Diesel8.104 8,194 5,437 b. Gasoline 3,497 # r c. Liquid Natural Compressed - :g Gas x 5. Fare Structure _y a. Base 2.00 2.00 1.00 b. Zone C. Youth d. Senior •50 ,50 .50 e. Handicapped .50 •50 50 3 f. Monthly Pass g. Other h. Average Fare .54 .54 .55 *There are no County passengers include inn these totals. **Includes miles for County service. All other figures. reflect City service only. y *Attach additional pages as necessary to alEer ar complete description .. w..N,.q•xe..x'Fn+,"'.r�.2C!.�w`-.h*"..;•�rY4- } • ♦ Y THREF YEAR FISCAL PLAN j s 19136-Ff7 1987-s38 '1988-89 - Operating Expenses $ 2,355 $ 219,755 $ 225,359 operating .Revenues.. Sources: LTF $ 170,050 $ 175,130 $ ` 180,410 4 STA Federal s : Fares ,550 37,645 38,775 , General Fund Other 6,755 6,980 7,t65 - # Total $ 213,355 $ 219,755 $ 226,350 r Capital Expenses $ 27,000 $ -D- $ -0- } ,_ Capital Revenue Sources:. LTF ': $ 27,000 $ -0- $ -0- 9 STA r: Federal Other Total $ 27,000 N $ -0- $ =0- 4 I 4 PLEM.,'INVENTORY (Article, Operator only) 1 I , j `: i I i Production # of. Fuel l Seat Special, Features j Imake & Model]. Year I Vehj.Typej��Capacity JAC :IEP --IFIC f other i r. `£. y: I i j TOTAL 1XXXXXXXXXXXI i 1XXXXXI I i f ! i. I j `' Vehicles 11982 Ch ev. ' i Station Wagon i 1986 i 2 'Station Wagon 2 'Diesel; i:X ,I i ' ; ; i I I I EP = Environmental Package two new gasoline engines rather than purchase: 11985 Ch wc wheelchair L ift two entirely new vehicles; 1986 -87 TDA Claim will ,address.this... Stationt Wagon 1985 1 5 kasolind -6 1 x I I I � j j � j j j j� i ! ;-: I 1 I , j `: i I i � ::i :: j I �j i ! L f I i r. `£. y: I i j TOTAL 1XXXXXXXXXXXI i 1XXXXXI I i f ! 1 I j `' Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 1986-87 ' i Station Wagon i 1986 i 2 i asol.i nd 6 1 x I I I t i i �. AC = Air conditioned ,I i ' ; ; i ' install **It may be feasible to purchase and EP = Environmental Package two new gasoline engines rather than purchase: wc wheelchair L ift two entirely new vehicles; 1986 -87 TDA Claim will ,address.this... 13 —13- :777 7:7 Article 4 Operator TDA Requirements 1. Fare Ratio Requirement A. For an operator serving a non -urbanized area and provid- ing exclusive service to the' elderly and handicapped, the -. ratio of -fare :. revenues :to ';_operatingcost ,(minus i depreciation) must equal .at: least 10$, or the' ratio the - operator, achieved in'FY 1978-79, whichever is greater. B. For "an operator serving an urbanized area, the ratio of fare revenues to o eratorin cost p g (minus depreciation) � must equal'.at -least 20%,'' or the ratio the. operator• z achieved.in FY 1978 -79i, -:whichever is .greater. i. What is this system's required farebox recovery'` ratio? 10% z. ii. Does. the attached budget demonstrate that the system , a will meet its required farebox` recovery ratio? Yes iii. Has the system utilized its 'grace year? No iv. Has this 'system been in non-compliance with its required. farebox ' recovery ratio? No If yes, -identify the year or years: 2. Local Suppoz'I Ratio '. _ A. For an operator serving a non -urbanized area, and/or' providing exclusive. service to" the elderly and'handi= capped, the ratio of fa"re' revenue plus local' support (local taxes, general fund, etc. 6611:3) to operating COSI, .(minus `depreciation) ,must` equal at least 10%, or the ratio the operator achieved' in FY 1978-79, whichever is greater: B. For an operator serving an urbanized area, the ratio of fare revenues plus local _support (local taxes, general fund, etc. 6611.3) to operating cost, Aminus depreciation) must equal at least 10%, or the ratio the operator 'achieved 'in FY 1978-79, whichever is greater. i. What is this system's required local support ratio?' 10 $ y IT ii. Does the attached budget demonstrate that the system will meet this required local: support ratio? yeC iii. Has thissystem utilized its grace year? No ,; s ;r � -14- tN r iv. Has this` system been in non—compliance with its 7 required local support, ratio? No If yes, identify the year or years: 3. Extension of Service An extension or. new service is exempt from the required ... farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of. service has been in operation for less TM than two years at the_end.of the fiscal year. =: B. The; claimant's operating cost for the fiscal year, after excluding the operating cost of the extension of service, exceeds its operating cost for the prior fiscal year. C The claimant submits a report on the extension of service - to COG. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(c)). f: i. Is this a new service? ii. Is there an extension of service being claimed? If soy please identify the extension. of service: =` 4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure -Increase s If anyof the ,line items on the -attached budget exceed by g more than 15% the expenditure for. that same -item in the - previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase = J. must be attached.' S r 5. Narrative Description - - i� ?� Describe any changes in service characteristics from the, _ previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if s necessary. One additional vehicle was purchased in,1934-85, Saturday service was initiated L Outdated; be Aped persons. These were all and fares lowered for non-elderlyand non -handicapped f� will for accomplished late in the fiscal year so itis impossible to ascertain the affect updated 1986-87 TDA of.service• A replacement vehicle -is included in year's budget to continue the replace Claim ' "" ;this merit of diesel, -powered. vehicles to gasoli.ne:" F Article 8 Contractor TDA Rer� rements For contracted transportation service providers, the 'San Joaquin County._ Council of Governments' Executive _ Board hasi waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do and t established a two-step process. c 1. Match .Requirement To receive the same amount!, of TDA funds _ (LTF and STA a combined) that -a service received in the previous year, ..no 4 more than 90% of the, operating. funds (minus depreciation): in the budget _may be TDA derived. The -ten percent or more. matching,funds may. come ;from an Y y other, source available 'to thecommunityas long'a s. it "is: not TDA. 4 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective } s To receive :an amount of TDA. funds (LTF and STA combined) ` in x excess ' of what was claimed °. the previous fiscal, year; ` the r fa claimant must :establish a, specific` service "objective for the fiscal year of the claim. This specific objective must be E the operating cost per passenger for the 'fiscal year of the _= claim. The objective should be a realistic one based on .g current and past system ,performance, but should be low enough to, represent an "improvement" when warranted. The COG Executive Board will adopt the operating cost per passenger figure that a claimant 'must meet in the fiscal year of the x cla im. h. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year, prior to the claim, then it would only be eligible to"file a"claim for the level" of `TDF, funding received in ; that fiscal year. If `a system wishes `; to P be eligible for _ increased TDA ; funding ; in. a: future' fiscal K year, then it should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. i. What was the level of: TDA funding received in the previous fiscal year;.for. this system (LTF and STA)? ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds? - iii. Is this claim requesting more TDA funds then were received in'theprevious fiscal year? u if yes, how much more? r -16-" iv. 7what was last year .s Operating Cost per Passenger Objective? - What was the actual Operating Cost per. Passenger? a.. FY 1984-85 Operating Cost $ b. Total Passengers - c. ''Operating CostPer Passenger '. is b) $ v. What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? ! d. Budgeted Operating Cost $ f e. Estimated Total Passengers f. Operating Cost per Passenger 1 (d -t e) $ 2 g FY 1985-86 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ ' Fifteen f Percent Expenditure Increase F1� t p - - If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than ;`15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase s . must be attached. ' 4. Narrative Description ,> Describe any changes in servicecharacteristics from the ?. previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. `s - rl -17- : - PART, III -:ROAD AND STREET:PR03ECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding.- LOCAL TRANSPORTATION.FUND" LTF Cost Project Title and Description Project Limits TotCost "- Miscellaneous Widening $ " 50,000 * Miscellaneous Curb &'Gutters 70,000 = R.R.- Grade Crossing Protection @ SPPI i Turner Road @ Mills i 15,000 Cherokee Lane t '10,000 s ;.. Washington' Street 1 14;000 ` ? Traffic Signals ' Lodi.Ave. & Church St. i ( 100,000 ! Hutchins & Tokay 40,000 t Miscellaneous Locations 80,000 t R;2 Xing Approach Improvements Tokay Street 30,000 -: i Locust, Street 47,000 Loma Drive Stockton Street Improvements Vine to Tokay 262,000 fi Century Blvd/WID Box Culvert & Crossing 100,000( * Hutchins'Street Improvements Rimby to Vine 58;000 } " Tokay to Lodi R/W .15;000 = * Cherokee Lane improvements Lockeford to S/Murray 75,000 * Pavement Management System 5,000 Street Maintenance 128,000 Administration/P1ann"ing 2,000 7 Use Additional Page il Necessary STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND ` STA Cost Pro'ect Title and:Descri tion Project Limits - Total- t 10 pn"p if Necessarv) i s i ".PART III '- ROAD AN STREET PROJECTS g Please provide the requested information:,for each project be identified for Transportation Development`Act funding., LOCAL TRANSPORTATION_FUND LTF . Cost Project Title and Description Project Limits Total Cost , Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays ( Protects - 1986 ! ! S 175,000 `( ! Turner Rd. Curb; Gutter S Street ! ! 1 Replacement @,Lodi Lake i i 11,000 Ham Lane Median. 1 Century/Kettleman i 34,000 ( Lockeford Street ! Pleasant to Sacramento ! 204,000 ! ; Sacramento to Cherokee ( 58,000 i r ` ! Tokay Street i SPRR to Cherokee 271,000 ! _ r ( California Street, Lockeford to ! Turner.... ( ! ! ! 66,000 ! 1 ! TOTAL ( $ 934,988 ( $1,926,000 ( q Use;Additional Page if Necessary),;. STAT:; TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND t e STA Cost A. Project 'Title 'and Description - Project Limits`- Total .Cost'