HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 3, 1986 (118)CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 3, 1986
BLAKLEY POOL
PRQ7i7CT City Manager Peterson reminded the Council that the 1985-86
Capital Improvement Programs include the stun of $215,000
CC -27(b) for the design and construction of a second swimming pool
M-55 in Blakley Park. Construction ($200,000) will be funded
utilizing a portion of the City's Co runity Development
Block Grant funds. Parks and Recreation Director Ron
Williamson has had discussions with people active in the
City's aquatic program cones ming this project. Those
talks have resulted in a re -thinking of the scope of this
project. The idea now is that, since the City is expending
a considerable amount of money in this effort,
consideration should be given to modifications and
additions which would make the facility a "competitive"
pool. This would significantly add to the pool's use.
Competitive swim meets could then be held in this pool.
The proposal is that the pool would remain the same size,
25 yards in length. The modifications would include
increasing the minimum depth from three feet to four feet.
The maximum depth would remain at five feet. Other
additions would include side gutter to provide for .smoother
water; starting block bases, tile lane lines in the bottom
of the pool; "targets" at the end of each lane; and lane
line hooks.
An estimate of the additional costs were presented for
Council's review.
Council was apprised that the Parks and Recreation
Commission's recommendation was that the benefits of the
modifications proposed did not justify the additional
expenditure, estimated at approximately $65,000. The
Commission had serious concerns that the added expenditure
would detrimentally affect other Parks and Recreation
Department projects budgeted elsewhere. It was aetexmmined
that the Commission was not made aware of the fact that
$70,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds had been
made available for reallocation as a result of the
reconstruction of the rest rooms on the north side of Lodi
Lake Park being funded via another State grant. This
project was intended to be funded with Community
Development Block. Grant Funds.
A lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed
to Staff. Council, on motion of Council Member Snider,
Hirschman second, then directed the staff to approach the
Parks and Recreation Commission a second time and advise
the Commission of the availability of these funds, the t
question being, would the Commission have voted differently
aimed with this information. It was requested that the
Commission hold a Special Meeting regarding this matter so
that this may be an agenda itea-m for the Regilar Council
Meeting of September 17, 1986.