HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 2, 1981 (26)Memorandum
To: Finance Director Date: September 2, 1981
From: City Manager
Under authority granted by the City Council at its
meeting of
September
1, 1981, the following employees in "unclassified
Service's
will
�4�
receive an increase to the salary indicated to be of fectivg
70
the
first pay period in July 1981:
7w
°
�Ek•S
sA cR?
SAlAIJI/
/t /1 7 L -
n.c
r 2
_�
Planning Director (Schroeder' $3125.00
.091
.070
0//
Finance Director (Wilson) $3080.00
07 S
"-
.075
a $S
Fire Chief (McLeod) $2855.00
�' 75
.0 ?5
3 <0
Police Chief (Yates) $3350.00
..0 75
• o 75
'3304
Public Works Director (Ronsko) C`0130 $3535.00
o7(,
070
•00(o
•„ .. , .,G.) O
Administrative Assistant (Hinkle) $2150.00
, 070
. 0 i0
c) 9o7
Assistant City Manager (Glenn) ? 3 $3110.00
•0 g)
, 070
a 7�
Recreation and Parks Director
(DeBenedetti ) $2875.00
. LO 7
---
, o,27
3�lS"
�o
�t
Utility Director (Curry .270 �-
09�
,070
�� �dl
Henr A. Glaves
City Manager
,pew JevQ y 64&, v flIMP
�dl Oy I
7131 }
September 1, 1981
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Subj: Department Head Salary Recommendations
I recently forwarded you a salary survey which encompassed
30 cities in Norther,California with populations between 25,000
45,000. Those salaries were that which was being paid on Januar
's -
t
i
over
and
January 1, 1981.;
Since that time we spot checked those cities which appeared on that
list and with one or two exceptions the salary data is correct. The
most significant thing we did find is that the movement since last
January has shown an overall increase in salaries in excess of 8%. :
When the City Council extablished the Management Compensation
Program it was.based on establishing an annual midpoint or control '•
point and.the•i giving the City Manager the flexibility of awarding
salaries up to plus or minus 10% from that point. In the case of
new.Department Heads I have used the lower 10% lir►it and then moved
the incumbent toward the midpoint. In case of the upper limit I have
been extremely careful in awarding salaries over the midpoint and
then only in small amounts. The position which is receiving the
highest amount over the midpoint is the Community Development Director s
who is receiving $40 per month over the control point.
In view of salary increases granted other city employees,
movement by comparable cities, and our own internal aligmmnet and
relationships I am making recommendations for control points for
Department heads of 7.5%. The specific figures are shown on the
attachment of this letter.
If I still have the authority to grant salaries up to 10% in
excess of the midpoint I can t:ien make adjustments which will reflect
performance and situations where we are significantly over or under
the market.
All of our bargaining units have had the opportunity to accept
city paid PERS in lieu of salary increases. I recommend that Depart-
ment Heads likewise be given this choice.
Henry A. Glaves Jr.
City Manager
CITY tVMGER RE00H 1KgMTION
MID
POINT
2760/3370
2730/3340
2855/3485
3005/3675
3165/3865
2540/3100
3095/3785
1950/2380
2770/3390
3065
3035
3170
3340
3515
2820
3440
2165
3080
PRESFM
MID
PPF—CEIYP
POSITION
RANGE
POIVT
SALAM
Connamity Develop.
Director
2565/3135
2850
2890
Finance Director
2545/3105
2825
2365
Fire Chief
2655/3245
2950
2655
Police Chief
2795/3415
3105
31-15
Public Works
Director
2945/3595
3270
3285
Recreation Director
2365/2885
2625
2670
' Utility Director
2860/3500
3180
3150
Administrative
Assistant
1815/2215
2015
2010
Assi
ultysWger
2580/3150
2865
2875
City Manager
3900
City Clerk
1802
City Attorney
2667
CITY tVMGER RE00H 1KgMTION
MID
POINT
2760/3370
2730/3340
2855/3485
3005/3675
3165/3865
2540/3100
3095/3785
1950/2380
2770/3390
3065
3035
3170
3340
3515
2820
3440
2165
3080