HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - August 21, 1985 (48)Information was presented to the Council fran City Manager
Peterson regarding Assembly Constitutional Amendment (ACA 7)
regarding nonpartison elections. Council. was informed that in
order for the voters to have the chance to vote on this
important issue in the Tune 1986 election, two actions must
occur:
Attached is a copy of the League president's message in the August
issue of Western City magazine. This matter was discussed by a panel
at the League's annaal Mayors and C;ouncihTemb°rs Legislative
Conference in May in Sacramento, attended by Councilmembers Olson
and Reid and me. The message needs no elaboration. In order for the
voters to have the chance to vote on this important issue in the June
1986 election, two actions must occur:
passage by the Assembly no later tt:an .August 30, 1985
confirmation by the Senate no later than January 8, 1986.
Also attached is a copy of that section of the latest League's
Legislative Bulletin which addresses this issue.
It is rEcommended that the City Council take action at its regular
meting of August 21, 1985 in support of the placing of AGA 7 on the
June 1986 ballot, and that this support be conveyed to our
representatives in the State Legislature.
THOMAS A. PETERSON
CITY MANAGER
TAP:vc
attachments
WESTERN CITY �..
Editor — Victoria Clark
Assistant Editor— Lynn Weigand
Advertising Toinettc O'Brien
Business Manager -Clark Gocckcr
`Official Publication of the
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA. CITIES
HEADQUARTERS
1400 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916)444-8960
OFFICERS
President
William J. Carroll
Mayor, Vacaville
First Vice President
Pat Russell
Council President, Los Ang,.es
Second Vice President
Jane Baker
Council Member, San f,7ateo
Past President
Dorill B. Wright
Mayor, Port Hueneme
Executive Director
Don Benninghoven
DIRECTORS
Helen Bedesem
Mayor, Half Moon Bay
Tom Bradley
Mayor, Los Angeles
June Bulman
Council Member. Concord
Kenneth I. Chappell
Council Member, West Covina
Dr. Thomas J. Clark
Council Member, Long Beach
Gregory R. Cox
Mayor, Chula Vista
Jack Crist
Director of Finance, Sacramento
Dianne Feinsteir.
Mayor, San Francisco
Barbara Gard
Vice Mayor, Redd,nu
Thelma Gomez
Vice Mayor. Tulare
Ron Gonzales
Council Member, Sunnyvale
Dan Griset
Mayor. Santa Ana
Roger Hedgecock
Mayor, San Ciego
Norma Hertzog
Mayor, Costa Mesa
Jackie Hildebrand
City Clerk, Redwood City
Dr. James R. Hughes
Vice Mayor. Pacific Grove
Karen Humphrey
Council Member, Fresno
James P. Jackson
City Attorney, Sacramento
Arthur Krieger
Director of Public Works. Pasadena
Pat Maisetti
Mayor. Patterson
John McWherter
Council Member, Vantura
Peggy Mansinger
Mayor, Modesto
G. David ?Allis
Recreation and
Community Services Director,
Lakewood
Rena M. "Pat" Murphy
Council Member. Cathedral City
John Petruzzielio
Fire Chief, Costa Mesa
James B. Schroeder
Community Development Director, Lodi
J. D. Smith
Police Chief. Lompoc
Lowe!i Smith
Mayor, St. Helena
Antonio P. Tirado
Mayor Pro Tern. Calexico
Alfonso C. Urlas
Mayor Pro Tem, Santa Paula
Iola Williams
Council Member. San Jose
Lionel Wilson
Mayor. Oakland
Willl3m woollett
City Manager. Irvine
Is Partiskn Electioneering Appropriate
in Nonpartisan Elections? Let the People Decile.
Last December's derision by the California Supreme Court in the case of Unger v. Superior
Court of the City and County of San Francisco has opened th-- door for political parties to
endorse and otherwise support candidates in judicial and local nonpartisan elections.
Long considered to be prohibited by law, such partisan electioneering in otherwise non-
partisan elect:ons would fundamentally change the way judges and local office holders are
chosen and how they approach their responsibilities.
The Unger case challenged one party's campaign against confirmation of three justices of
the Supreme Court in the 1982 General Election. TI.ose three justices correctly stepped aside
and were replaced by retired district court judges. Once reconstituted, the Court ruled against
Unger, finding no provision in either the Elections Code or the California Constitution which
specifically prohibits electioneering by the parties in nonpartisan elections.
That leaves it up to the Legislature to act. And, during the 1985- 86 session, the lawmakers
are considering a Constitutional Amendment — ACA 7 — which would restore the spirit of
nonpartisanship to nonpartisan elections by adding the following to the California Consti-
tution: "No political party or party central committee may endorse, support, or oppose a
candidate for nonpartisan office."
But, the Amendment faces a bleak future in the increasingly partisan Legislature, unless
city officials and the voters speak up.
Without the Amendment, elections for nonpartisan offices would remain "nonpartisan"
in only two respects: the parties would not be permitted to nominate candidates and no party
affiliation would appear on the ballot. in every other way "nonpartisan" elections clearly
would be partisan: the parties could endorse and oppose candidates, raise funds, devise
strategies to elect or defeat candidates, and infuse money into campaigns. Such elections
would be "nonpartisan" in name only.
Probably the most alarming scenario made possible by this gap in the law is the spectre of
a politically aligned judiciary. Who would trust the fairness of a trial, which may lirnit one's
freedom or prosperity, to ajudiciary whose members owe their allegiance — not to the people
or to justice — but to the political parties which helped them ,et elected?
On the',ocal level, I'm concerned that the intrusion of party politics will .. .
— lead to what has been dubbed the "private primary", where a party's candidates are
chosen, not by the voters, but by a handful of people, acting in private, who comprise the
party's central committee, people whose names are rarely recgSnizabie by the people,
— create an environment for less open and less responsive government at the local level,
and
— create divided loyalties among those who are elected to serve their neighbors — not
their party bosses.
I can vouch for the fact that it often is necessary to pu, aside narrow self-interest for the
good of the community and that it is possible for honorable t)eople to do so. But, it is wiser
when a political system removes the temptation to act selfishly in the interest of ensuring
good government.
The concept of nonpartisan judicial and local elections has workers well in California for
many decades. But, that record may be threatened unless the people have a chance to vote
on ACA 7.
To appear on the June 1986 ballot, ACA 7 must be passed by the Assembly no later than
August 30 and confirmed by the Senate no later than January 8. That makes it essential for
Californians to act now to ensure their voices can be heard nest June.
A change of this magnitude should not take place simply because our Senators and Assem-
bly Members fail to act. By passing ACA 7, the Legislature can ensure that a change as
significant as this is to the people of California will be decided by the people.
Whether the voters agr,:c that the nonpartisan spirit of nonpartisan elections should be
preserved is immaterial
The yt.estion is: Given [tie partisan nature of politics in the Legislature, will the people
get a chance to decide'?
— $rif Carroll'
2 August 1985i'.§$s:er r: i': _
4. SUPPORT Nonpartisan Elec,ions. ACA 7 (Mountjoy). ACA 7 still
lacks the votes necessary for passage in the Assembly
Elections and Reapportionment Committee. This
proposed,Constitutional Amendment reverses a
t
California Supreme Courdecision which held that neither the California
Constitution nor statutes prohibit political parties or their central
committees from supporting, endorsing, or opposing candidates for nonpartisan
office (i.e., judges, school board members, city council members and county
supervisors)..
In an effort to build public support for placing this important issue before
the voters of California, the Leagua recently distributed a press kit to
newspapers statewide asking for their editorial support. City officials are
urged to immediately contact their respective newspapers encouraging editoriaa
support to ensure that these important, local offices remain nonpartisan. if
the Constitutional Amendment is to be on the ballot in June of 1986 action an
this measure must occur in the Assembly Elections Committee August 19 then be
immediately acted upon in the Senate when the Legislature returns in January.
This is an issue where a council resolution from every city will be necessary
if members of the Assembly Elections and Reapportionment Committee will act tz,
put this important issue before the people. City councils are urged to
immediately contact their respective Assembly Members and members of the
Assembly, Elections and Reapportionment Committee before August 21. Committee.
members are: Klehs, Chair; Mountjoy; Vice Chair; Chacon, Costa, Davis, Elder.
Filante, La Follette, :.nd, Peace. (Referred to previously in Bulletins
#7-1985, #15-1985.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 August 7, 1935