The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - August 5, 1981 (61)APPLICATION TO LAFCO FOR WOOCK, ET AL REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI AND DETACHMENT FROM THE WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION e S ? h f APPLICATION TO LAFCO FOR WOOCK, ET AL REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI AND DETACHMENT FROM THE WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION Agenda item "q" - "Application - Woock, et al Reorganization, including annexation to the City of Lodi and detachment from the Woodbridge Fire District and Woodbridge Irrigation District" was introduced by Community Development Director Schroeder who presented diagrams of the subject area. A lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff. DISTRICT. On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Hughes APPROVED. second, Council adopted Resolution No. 81-109 - "Resolution Approving the Application of the RES. NO. 81-109 Woock, et al Reorganization, Including Annexation to the City of Lodi and Detachment from the Woodbridge Fire District and the Woodbridge Irrigation District". AN Pv "i paw i Y 4 r"f4 rRic . 'i� mss•' � � zi,�il'l{tc ... t t � i'ky��^ 7 �i `y} � A7 �� t3 �'}xYy4, •}�5�'j ��+,y�lS',,yttt,'"'^a� std (''a'� Yf' L * � '�rve f ,4.,��`C�4�' �r- � •`Y_ is � < { �y ��Y. �• k, +*"��'H��n �'��'� ��. s .. ` grit c �l 9 � \G� t�. ?2i: r. z a r ,...- .a., .. ... 4�'4'�w�...i�.�i c�•$ a�„�i',�;+yk��, A�,,�"' _'i t. ...._.,..___......�...__..�.r__r....•...,». ... ••�•••-�rrrw�..awa�as.xaxwe.ww e � t Agenda item "q" - "Application - Woock, et al Reorganization, including annexation to the City of Lodi and detachment from the Woodbridge Fire District and Woodbridge Irrigation District" was introduced by Community Development Director Schroeder who presented diagrams of the subject area. A lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff. DISTRICT. On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Hughes APPROVED. second, Council adopted Resolution No. 81-109 - "Resolution Approving the Application of the RES. NO. 81-109 Woock, et al Reorganization, Including Annexation to the City of Lodi and Detachment from the Woodbridge Fire District and the Woodbridge Irrigation District". AN Pv "i paw i Y 4 r"f4 rRic . 'i� mss•' � � zi,�il'l{tc ... t t � i'ky��^ 7 �i `y} � A7 �� t3 �'}xYy4, •}�5�'j ��+,y�lS',,yttt,'"'^a� std (''a'� Yf' L * � '�rve f ,4.,��`C�4�' �r- � •`Y_ is � < { �y ��Y. �• k, +*"��'H��n �'��'� ��. s .. ` grit c �l 9 � \G� t�. ?2i: r. z a r ,...- .a., .. ... 4�'4'�w�...i�.�i c�•$ a�„�i',�;+yk��, A�,,�"' _'i t. ...._.,..___......�...__..�.r__r....•...,». ... ••�•••-�rrrw�..awa�as.xaxwe.ww {� JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL V FOR REORGANIZATION OR CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AFFECTING LOCAL AGENCIES Filed Frith: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY c/o Gerald F. Scott, Executive Officer County Courthouse, Room 508 222 East Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 Phone: (209) 944-2196 Date- July 13, 1981 The undersigned, on behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby give notice of intention to: incorporate a city form a district annex territory to an agency — consolidate existing agencies. _ disincorporate a city dissolve a district XX detach territory from an agency To further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following: 1. Three (3) copies of this completed "Justification of Proposal". 2. Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected territory consistent with standards acceptable tQ the County Surveyor's Office. 3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies (maps to be no smaller than 8�" x 11" which is the most preferable size and shall be no larger than 18" x 26". 4. Filing end processing fees in accordance with LAFCO fee schedule. The following persons (not to exceed three) are to be mailed copies of the Executive Officer's Report and Notice of Commission hearings regarding the subject proposal. GLEN 1. BAUMBACH, c/o BAUMBACH b PIAllA, 323 W. Oak Street, Lodi, CA 95240 (Name) – (Address) ALICE M. REIMCHE, CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI, P. 0. BOX 320, LODI, CA 95241 (Name) (Address) JAMES B. SCHROEDER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, CITY OF LODI, P. 0. BOX 320, LODI CA 95241 (Name) (Address) COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS (Signed) If a question is not applicable to your proposal, you may so state. 1. Local Agency organization changes hereby proposed --designate affected agencies and annekations by name: WOOCK REORGANIZATION - Annexation to City of Lodi & detachment from Woodbridge Fire District & Woodbridge Irrigation District. 2. Statutory provisions governing proceedings: Title 60 Division 1 (commencing with Sec. 56000) of the California Gov't Code District Reorganization Act of 1965. .rte:. -•.:.-. •;. .Q-w...✓i...»,'., e:• ''=.. - - 3- Do proposed boundaries create an island or corri3or of unincorporated r territory? NO 4. Do proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ounership? NO S. Land area affected: Square utiles Acres 210; 6. Population in subject area: 5-t0 7. Number of registered voters: 4 8. Registered voter density (per acre): 9. Number of dwelling units: 2 10. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years: 2000 - 3000 persons if fully developed. 11. Present land use of subject area: Agricultural and 2 residences.' 12. What is the intended development of this area: Low density residential - 1-10 units per acre. 13. Present zoning: -GA-40 (S. 1J. County) ' 14. Describe proposed zoning cnanges: U --N, Unclassified Folding (City of Lodi) l5. Aesgssed v lue of land: $ 387,714 , 16. Assessed value of improvements: $ 130,911 17. Value of publicly owned land in area: $ 159,222 18. Governmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available: None. Future development will require the full range, of Cit services. 19. What alternatives measures would provide services listed in Item 18 above? CombinationofCounty services, special service districts b private wells and 20. maticmoMIfieations must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to provide services initiated by this proposal? 4Ex��teiinsion of streets, water 6 sewer lines when developed construction of a storm 21. Whatnaapproxi&ate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Item 20 above? Unknown at this time. • 22. How will such costs be met? Developer will bear most of cost with some City participation. 23. Will provisions of'this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency or affected property? . NO 24. E3 Check here if yoc are submitting further comments and evaluations on additional pages. •_2_ (Rev. 7-81) L;7 ;ZZ Ov N o`er L;7 ;ZZ Ov N L;7 :� NPo =��""� Ati1i1 .MT-. rz� r NEGATIVJ: DWARATION Blot is hereby given that the Cit of Lodi P atinin P•' ►artment ha ice y g y o 1 determined that the following proposal will have no Significant Impact on the Environment": Supporting documentation is avail,:,,le . ' in the for -w of a "Preliminary Envirotlmental Assessment" and is avail- able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Nall Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyune wishing to appeal the issuance of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so uo later than the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal". to July 3. 1981 Project Title: WOOCK, ET AL. REORGAM7AT10N poasible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: DAVID MORINOTO "OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT: BAUhBACH 6 PIAZZA OF I oi)1 1.1 fil l(AI 14 All. 1111 AVVI 11'Atli IIA; NA i'I:1' :FNf PI AN. root DFvri OPIiLNT. ect 1Meat ioll LODI U.ity to 11plw-$ I: 7-13-81 _._ 1;�•n,lt�c1 1,0( AAc111 Cc1u►►iy SPJI JOAQU 1 N (:0111- i I Y '1,1►1i ►••.•. 1ii►,•► ►• i'r►• 1 ir�i�►.i� y I r►v iru►►n�••nl A .•.i� :s1u�•iit i-. Ava i 1, hlv: LOW C 11 Y PI ANN HIG I-1 1' 1 . 2?1 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240 Phone: (2.09) 331-5614 t .g Ci ty • Co �sSS: 323 W. E'm Street Lodi W Ai San J quin Code: Phone; w (209) 368-6618 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION TtiE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A 204+ ACRE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI- THE SUBJECT AREA IS BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE WOODBRI DGE IRRIGATION CANAL ON 'IHE NORTH BY THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CENTURY BLVD. AND ON THE SOUT11 BY HARKY i Atlf. . 111E ARFA IS Of S iGUArrD FAR LOW DENSITY_RE51DENT]AL 011_-THE—C1.T_Y,._ OF I oi)1 1.1 fil l(AI 14 All. 1111 AVVI 11'Atli IIA; NA i'I:1' :FNf PI AN. root DFvri OPIiLNT. ect 1Meat ioll LODI U.ity to 11plw-$ I: 7-13-81 _._ 1;�•n,lt�c1 1,0( AAc111 Cc1u►►iy SPJI JOAQU 1 N (:0111- i I Y '1,1►1i ►••.•. 1ii►,•► ►• i'r►• 1 ir�i�►.i� y I r►v iru►►n�••nl A .•.i� :s1u�•iit i-. Ava i 1, hlv: LOW C 11 Y PI ANN HIG I-1 1' 1 . 2?1 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240 Phone: (2.09) 331-5614 t .g s 1 ^ Environmental Assessment iHITIAL STUDY 1. PROJECT TITLE WOOCK, ET AL REORGANIZATION 2. LOCATION Bounded by WI Canal, Harney Lane,. Lower Sacramento Road b future 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION extension o CenturyBoulevard. Applicant is requesting annexation of 20Vt acres of land to the City of Lodi. The property is currently in agricultural use. There are no current plans to develop the property. y. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) Agricultural (B) Residential -low density (1-10 units per acre). 5.. Site description and surrounding land use The area is currently agricultural with scatteredirssldendes4 .The area to the east is developed with subdivision. The area to the north is undergoing residentlal development. b. Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) GA -40, general agriculture -40 acre; (B) U -N, unclassified holding. Will the Project Nave,a Significant Effect Th rough Any of the Fol Iow�IIng impacts 7. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil or subsoil features.... ............................ b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.. c. Substantlally deplete surface or groundwater resources ............................................. d. Substantially Interfere with groundwater flow or recharge ....:...................................... e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion orsiltation .......................................... f. Substantial Interference with the habitat of any species of fish, wildlife or plant .................... g. Violate ambient air quality standards or create substantial air emissions or objectionable odors...... h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare levelfor adjoining areas ............. 9............... i. Substantial reduction of existing cropland.:.......... J. Expose individuals or property to geologic, public health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards...... '. e ..'Yes No 'Maybe X X X X X X X •• X .X Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: add to current overcrowding of L.U.S.D. Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by InJtial Study: Payment of fees to the L.U.S.D. by the developer to help finance the construction of additional classroom space. RECOWENDATION Negative Declaration EIR X Conditional Negative I. Declaration' JAMES B. SCHROEDER E v i ronme t i Review 'yOff i car By '.Date r� Yes No Maybe k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic - effect ............................................... X 1. Result In the disruption or alteration of an archeological, historical or paleontological site.... X m. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in X any natural resources ................................ n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of X fuelor energy ....................................... o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sever, storm dra.In, electrical lines or public roads .............. X P. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of public services such as schools or fire or police protection. ......................................... X q. Substantially change transportation patterns related to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking X availability or traffic safety ....................... r. Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace- . ment of population ................................... X s. Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or planned land uses..... .............................. X t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of X the City of Lodi......... Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: add to current overcrowding of L.U.S.D. Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by InJtial Study: Payment of fees to the L.U.S.D. by the developer to help finance the construction of additional classroom space. RECOWENDATION Negative Declaration EIR X Conditional Negative I. Declaration' JAMES B. SCHROEDER E v i ronme t i Review 'yOff i car By '.Date f �1 ;•^tel Environmental Assessment INITIAL STUDY 1. PROJECT TITLE WOOCK, ET AL REORGANIZATION 2. LOCATION Bounded by MIID Canal, Harney Lane, Lower Sacramento Road b future 3. extension o CenturyBoulevard." PROJECT DESCRIPTION Applicant Is requesting annexation of 204+ acres of land to the" City of Lodi. The property is currently in agricultural use. There are no current pians to develop the property. 4. Agricultural General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) (B) Residential -low density (3-10 units per acre). 5. Site description and surrounding land use The area is currently aeric ult6ral with-sdatter$dsrosidendesa . The area to the east is develoiled with subdivision. The area to the north is undergoing resident'lal development. 6. Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) GA -40, general a2riculture-40 acre (B) U -H, unclassified holding. the Prb�ecctTHaave a Significant Effect ire Following 1!12acts? r Yes No 1i8 b 7. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil or subsoil features ................................... X b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.. X c. Substantlally deplete surface or groundwater X resources ............................................. a d. Substantially Interfere with groundwater flow X or recharge...... ...................................... e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion or siltation ................ ......................... X f. Substantial Interference.with the habitat of any X species of fish, wildlife or plant .................... �• g. Violate ambient air quality standards or create X substantial air emissiori or objectionable odors...... h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare X level for adjoining areas... 1. Substantial reduction of existing cropland............ X J. Expose Individuals or property to geologic, public X health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards...... ._._.. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Woock Reorganization involves the annexation of 210+ acres to the City of Lodi and the withdrawal of this property from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District and the Woodbridge irrigation District. The property is located in southwest Lodi. The area is south of the future extension of Century Boulevard, west of the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal, north of Harney Lane and east of Lover Sacramento Road. The project parcels are in agricultural uses except for scattered residences. r' The area to the north was recently annexed and there is development activity on portions of this area. The area to the east is developed in residential subdivisions. The area to the south, across Harney Lane, is in agricultural uses. The land to the west has a mixture of agricultural and residential uses. This area contains a small subdivision, a feed supply operation, and the area known as Henderson Village. Henderson Village contains a school, several small businesses and a number of residences. The area proposed for annexation is designated residential low density in the City of Lodi General Plan. This designation permits 1-10 residential units per acre. The City of Lodi owns a 26.9 acre parcel which is included in this annexation. This is a site for a future storm drainage basin/park. Excluding this parcel from the total acreage, there would be approximately 183 acres that could be developed. At an average of 6 units per acre the acreage could yield approximately 1100 units of housing when fully developed. K The area is within the urban growth line and General Plan area of the City of Lodi and is designated for residential development. The City of Lodi has developed its utility system to serve this area with water, sanitary sewage, storm drainage and electricity. Future development would require extensions of existing utility lines and the construction of streets and other improvements. The applicant does not have any current proposal to develop his property. The property will be given a zoning designation of U -H, Unclassified -Holding. This zone does not permit development of urban uses. A rezoning to a specific development zone would be required to develop this property. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The annexation will have no significant impact on the environment. Future development of the property. however, could affect the environment. If developed with urban uses, the property would be affected by transforming a primarily agricultural property to an urban use. The existing crops would be replaced with streets, houses and other related improvements. The existing agri- cultural land would be taken out of production with little likelihood of ever returning to agricultural production. The impact of the loss of agricultrral land is mitigated by the location of the property. The property is located within the General Plan area of Ove City of Lodi and is designated for residential development. Annexation of this area provides for the orderly growth of the City and allows for future housing for its citizens. The area has been•incli}ded in the design area of the City's utility system. Line and plant capacities have been engineered to service this area as it develops. The City has a specific plan for Century Boulevard, a major east -west street, along the north property line. The City has also purchased a 23+ acre parcel for a storm drainage basin and park to service this area. The basin property Is included as part of this annexation. Development of the property for residential uses could impact the Lodi Unified School District by generating additional students. The LUSD is currently exper- iencing problems of overcrowding. This can be mitigated by requiring the applicant to enter into an agreement with the LUSD to provide financial assistance to the District. The developer would pay an agreed-upon amount to help finance additional classroom space to house new students. They would also agree to abide by any recce mendations developed by the Countywide Task - force on school financing. FINDINGS Based on the initial study, the City of Lodi have a significant effect on the environment LUSD. This impaction can be mitigated by the the LUSD by the developer. finds that the project will not except for the impaction on the payment of appropriate fees to CITY COUNCIL JAMES A. WCARTY, Mayor ROBERT C. MUfiPHY, Mayor Pro Tem RICHARD L. HUGHES WALTER KATNICH JAMES W. PINKERTON. Ir. C,1 CITY OF LORI CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 320 LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 (209) 3345534 August 18, 1981 d Mr. Gerald F. Scott Executive Officer 14 -cal Agency Formation Commission County Courthouse, Roam 153 222 East Weber Avenue Stockton, California 95202 HENRY A. L—LAVES, Jr. City Manager ALICE M. REIMCHE City clerk RONALD M. STEIN City Attomey Re: "Woock Addition" Reorganization to the City of Lodi and detachment from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District and Woodbridge Irrigation District Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the following documents pertaining to the aforementioned reorganization and detachment: 1. Three (3) copies of "Justification of Proposal". 2. Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected territory - consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Office. 3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies (area and vicinity maps). 4. Filing fee of $300.00. 5. Seven (7) copies of Resolution No. 81-109 - "Resolution of the Lodi City Council for application to the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission in the matter of the proposed "Woock Addition" reorganization, including the detachment of certain territory within the area proposed for annexation to the City of Lodi" Also enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration. We have also enclosed herewith the subject Environmental Documentation. Please do not hesitate to call, should you need additional information regarding this matter. very truly yours, ,/ ALICE M. REI City Clerk Encls. 'JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSA. FOR' REORGANIZATION OR CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AFFECTING LOCAL AGENCIF.S Filed with: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY c/o Gerald F. Scott, Executive Officer County Courthouse, Room 508 222 East Weber Avenue Stockton, CA 95202 Phone: (209) 944-2196 Date: July 13, 1981 The undersigned, on behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby give notice of intention to: incorporate a city _ forma district annex.territory to an agency consolidate existing agencies. disincorporate a city dissolve a district detach territory froze an agency To further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following: 1. Three (3) copies of this completed "Justification of Proposal". 2. Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected territory consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Of f ice. 3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies (maps to be no smaller than 8�" x 11" which its the most preferable size and shall be no larger than 18" x 26". 4. Filing and processing fees in acco.;dance with LAFCO fee schedule. The following persons (not to exceed three) are to be mailed copies of the Executive Officer's Report and Notice of Commission hearings regarding the subject proposal. GLEN 1. BAUMBACH, c/o BAUMBACH b PIAllA, 323 W. Oak Street, Lodi, CA 95240 (Name) (Address) ALICE M. REIMCHE, CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI, P. 0. BOX 320, LODI, CA 95241 (Name) (Address) JAMES B. SCHROEDER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, CITY OF LODI, P. 0. BOX 320, IODI ICA 9524 (Name S ( igned) COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS If a question is not applicable to your proposal, you may so state. 1. Local Agency organization changes hereby proposed --designate affected agencies and annekations by name: WOOCK REORGANIZATION - Annexation to City of Lodi b detachment from Woodbridge ._ Fire District s Woodbridge Irrigation District. 2. Statutory provisions governing proceedings: Title 6, Division 1 (commencing with Sec. 56000) of the California Gov't Cade District Reorganization Act of 1965. 3. Do proposed boundaries create an island or corridor of unincorporated territory? NO 4. Do proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ownership? NO 5. band area of fected : Square miles Acres: 210+ 6. Population in subject area: 5-10 . 7. Dumber of registered voters: 4 8. Registered voter density (per acre): Number of dwelling units: 2 Estimate of population increase in next 10 years: 2000 - 3000 persons if fully developed. Present land use of subject area: Agricultural and 2 residences.* What is the intended development of this area: kow density residential - 1-10 units per acre. Present zoning: -GA-4o (s. ii. County) ' Describe proposed zoning cnanges: U -H, Unclassified Folding (City of Lodi) Assgssed value of land: $ 387,714 Assessed value of improvements: $ 130,911 17. Value of publicly owned land in area: $_ _159,222. 18. Governmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available: None. Future development will require the full range. of Cit services. 19. What alternatives measures would provide services listed in Item 18 above - Combination of County services, special service districts & private wells and 20. MtiMCM ications must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to provide services initiated by this proposal? Extension of streets, water & sewer lines when developed construction of a storm , -drainage bass 21. What $PProMn ate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Item 20 above? Unknown at this time. 22. How will such costs be met? Developer will hear most of cost with some City participation. 23. Will provisions of•this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency or affected property? No 24. 1:3 Check here if you are submitting further comments and evaluations. on additional pages. 1 . —2- (Rev. 7-81) .,....vh!�59r.i,.:�.............. ....,.....:..�'�.T:.'. Sd+A:r_r. ...sF .+:..41f WOOCK, ET AL REORGANIZATION A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, the Southeast 1/4 of Section 15, and the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, Township 3 North Range 6 East being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Section 15; thence North 00 07' 30" West along the East line of said Section, 1321.07 feet; 'thence North 89 09' 30"West, 2612.16 feet So a point in the East line of LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD; thence North 0 01' 15" East, along said East Iine, 1319.28 feet to a point in the North line of the South- east 1/4 of said Section 15;.thence South 890 11' 45" East, along said North line, 1280.52 feet to the Southwest corner of LOBAUGH SOUTH REORGANIZATION as annexed So the City of Lodi by Lodi City Resolution No. 81-50; thence South 89 11' 45" East, along the Lodi City Limit Line, 1329.17 feet; thence South 890 12' 00" East, along said City Lim -€t Line, 1443-23 feet to the Southeast corner of said LOBAUGH SOUTH REORGANIZATION; thence leaving said City Limit Line, South 0 05' 52" East, 780.00 feet; thence South 890 12' 00" East, 480.27 feet to a point in J. C. BECKMAN ADDITION as annexed to the City of Lodi by Lodi City Ordinance No. 901; th nce along said City Limit Line the following three: courses: (1) South 1g 03' 35" East, 486.61 feet; (2) South 890 20' 15" East, 700.00 feet; (3) South 00 04' 30" East, 1364.72 feet to the sou h- west corner of said J. C. BECKMAN ADDITION said point also being a point in the South tine of HARNEY LANE, agd lying 25.00 feet South of the North line of Section 23; thence North 89 28' 30" West, along said South line, and parallel to said North line, 2§30.15 feet to a point in the West line of said Section 23; thence North 0 07' 30" West, along said West line, 25.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 210.7 acres, more or less. 777 xq QUI F :k:a iE'T 2:ts`A��JCaiYa� t F � YK y� l mm===;I summa■ ■■■ In loos■■■■1 11E■I■•l .U■IIIII _ `y®AUMBACH & PiAZZ^ 42237 at 10Mn—_ _�, �`CIViL ENGINEERS - _ _ - r r�1 -221 W[8T OAK STR[[T :—L.oc /CAUr. 95240 AUGUST 21 81 121 1 To TliB' LAf CO •�JvvwL .pONUEitOY fl .. oo e.rsen --------- DOLLARS ' - ��`.�' - _ . _ .' . :' • =�'„^ _ = - ,,,,.�,,- ',,=-^�,v`: ------------ - � �—�. --- - - LOOT. CALtfORN1A^ "- � .�%'.�.✓r.0�4�'23 x:12 i ia�3�.4 i�:�:�10� l 15.48?r-- •_ -- - -' _ - _ _ _ -.� - RESOLUTION NO. 81-109 RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR THE APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN COUVM LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED "WOOCK ADDITION" REORGANIZATION INCLUDING DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District Reorganization Act of 1%5 contained in Division 1 of Title 6 (commencing with Section 56000) of the California Government Code, and; `' WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organization is the annexation of the City of Lodi of an area comprising 210 acres, more or less, and the with- drawal of said 210 acres from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District and the Woodbridge Irrigation District and described and depicted in Exhibit "A". WHEREAS, no other counties, cities or districts are affected, and; WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to this City of Lodi and detached frog; the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District and Woodbridge Irrigation District is uninhabited; W ERM, no new districts era proposed to be formed by this reorganisation, and= WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows: (1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban confines of the City and will generate service needs substantially similar to that of other incorporated urban areas which require municipal government service. (2) Annexation to the City of Lodi of the subject area will result in improved economics of scale in government operations while insproving coordination in the delivery of planning services. (3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of San Joaquin will benefit from the proposed reorganisation as a result of savings to the County by reduction of County required services in unincorporated but urban oriented area. (4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi is geographically, socially, economically, and politically part of the same urban area of which the City of Lodi is also a part. N Page No. 2 147 (5) The subject area is within the Lodi sphere of influence. (6) Future inhabitants of a City residential subdivision in they subject area will gain immediate response in regard to pol ice and fire protection, unlimited City garbage and trash collection service, street lighting service, a modern sewer system, other municipal services, and improvement of property values. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lodi that the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the proposed Woock Reorganization, which includes annexation of 210 acres from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District and Woodbridge Irrigation District as described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hecto. This is all subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions. Dated: August 5, 1981 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 81-109 was parsed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held August 5, 1981 by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen - Hughes, Murphy, Pinkerton, and McCarty Noes Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - Katnich 4 � ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk 81-109 • NEGATIVE: Dr:C1,ARATIGN : notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Plannili.1 P:partwreni. ha-- � ctetcrTnined that the following proposal will have no "Significant Impict on the Environment". Supporting documentation is avail,: -,le t in the fora of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment and is avail— able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City {fall i Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anycne wishing to appeal the issuance r, of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal". - •U2 July 3, 1981 Project Title: WOOCK, ET AL. REORGAt117AT10N Po asible Agency: Lodi Plannina Dept. Contact Person: DAVID MOR1f10TO MOF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT: BAUMBACH b PIAllA 1 gess 323 W. E!m Street Code: (209) City• LodI •tri rrturie i P cis -... 368-6618 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATIO11 == `.: THE APPLICANT IS I ESTING A 204+ THE SUBJECT AREA IS BOUNDED ON THE NEST BY TIIE WOO RIDGE IRRIGATION CANA4 ON iFIE NORTH BY TIE FUTURE EXTENSION OF CENTURY BLVD. AND ON THE SOUTH BY IIARNCY l At1r : T1IE ARTA 15 Drs IGISATr.D- FOR L0%1_ DEIISIJX- ttE5 tDFItT.tAL 0lh7lIE. -C 1 TY •�h or 1 nti 1 1I1 Ari, 1111' Arm 11'A111 HAS NO t'ta :rNr rI ANS Pott nrvri pi I1.LNr, , ec t to Ea- 1()I I C i 1'y LODI .. 7-13-81 ___- ��i'ci,ji�ct: ►.ci�.it�ii�it 01111i1y . SI',11 .10A01111`1 CnI I;1 I Y 1.t�1� t•�.•. la�.•e r 111-,• 1 6 611.11 y 1 nv i 1.4111111••111 A•.�.�� :�.nn•i�t' i!. Ava i 1.1111,•: LODI CITY P1ANN Ifir, III i I 221 W. Pith. St., 1.0di, CA 95240 Phone: 209) 334-5634 n y . A Environmental Assessment ° INITIAL STUDY I. PROJECT TITLE WOOCK, ET AL REORGANIZATION 2. LOCATION Bounded by WID Canal, Harney Lane, Lower Sacramento Road b future t 3. extension of Lentury Boulevard. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Applicant is requesting annexation of 2044- acres of land to the'City of Lodi. The property is currently in agricultural use. There are no current plans to =-- develop the property. b. Agricultural General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) (B) Residential -low density (1* -10 units per acre). ° 5. Sit& description and s►trrounding land use The area is currently aq•ricul tirral ,. with scatterodiresidencesl .The area to the east is developed with subdivision.. The area to the north is undergoing residential development.' 6.- Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) GA -40, general agriculture -40 acre; (B) U -N, unclassified holding. _mill the PrBject Have.a Significant Effect 'Mill roup ny of the Followingmmppacts? °"Yas ho 'Maybe �►. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil or subsoil features........ X b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.. •'X ' c. Substantially deplete surface or groundwater - resources ............................................. d. Substantially interfere with groundwater flow X - or recharge....:.. . e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion orsiltation .......................................... .. X' f. Substantial interference. with the habitat of any X species of fish, wildlife or plant .................... g. Violate ambient air quality standards or create X substantial air emissions or objectionable odors...... h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare X - level for adjoining areas ............................. .. 1. Substantial reduction of existing cropland.-.-.......... X ' J. Expose individuals or property to geologic, public X " ' health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards...... Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: add to current overcrowding of L•.U.S.0. • Mitigation -Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by initial Study-. Payment of fees to the L.U.S.D. by the developer to help finance the construction of additional classroom space. RECOMMENDATION Negative Declaration EIR X Conditional Negative ►ac:r•;i. Dec i ara t i on - . .. .4MES B. SCHROEDER E vi rornmeRtl i Rev I ew 0 f f i ce r Yes 'Ho }lsybe k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic - effect. .............................................. X 1. Result in the disrupti•.a or alteration of an X archeol�icai, historical or paleontological site.... in. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in X any natural resources ................................ •n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of X fuel or energy ....................................... _ o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm X drain, electrical lines or public roads .............. p. Substantially increase demand ror or utilization of public services such as schools or fire or police protection.............................0............. : X q. Substantially change transportation patterns related • to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking X ' availability or traffic safety ....................... ' 'r. Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace- X anent of population.........:. ........................ s. Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or X planned land uses ................................... 't. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of X this City of Lodi .................................... Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: add to current overcrowding of L•.U.S.0. • Mitigation -Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by initial Study-. Payment of fees to the L.U.S.D. by the developer to help finance the construction of additional classroom space. RECOMMENDATION Negative Declaration EIR X Conditional Negative ►ac:r•;i. Dec i ara t i on - . .. .4MES B. SCHROEDER E vi rornmeRtl i Rev I ew 0 f f i ce r NOOCK ET AL REORGANIZATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Woock Reorganization involves the annexation of -710* acres to the City of Lodi and the withdrawal of this proP ert from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District and the Woodbridge Irrigation District. The property is located in southwest Lodi. The area is south of the future extension of Century Boulevard, west of the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal, north of Harney Lane and east of Lower Sacramento Road. The project parcels are in agricultural uses except for scattered residences. The area to the north was recently annexed and there is development activity on portions of this area. The area to the east is developed in residential subdivisions. The area to the south, across Harney Lane, is in agricultural uses. The land to the west has a mixture of agricultural and residential uses. This area contains a small subdivision, a feed supply operation, and the area known as Henderson Village. Henderson Village contains a school, several small businesses and a number of residences. The area proposed for annexation is designated residential low density in the t of Lodi General Plan. Thisdesignation i 1- 0 residential units per � permits 1 ,I Yel e3cre. The City of Lodi owns a 26.9 acre parcel which is included In this annexation. This is a site for a future storm drainage basin/park. Excluding th=s parcel from the total acreage, there would be approximately 183 acres that could be developed. At an average of 6 units per acre the acreage could yield approximately 1100 units of housing when fully developed. The area Is within the urban growth line and General Plan area of the City of Lodi and Is designated for residential development. The City of Lodi has developed its utility system to serve this area with water, sanitary sewage, storm drainage and electricity. Future development would require extensions Y of existing utility lines and the construction of streets and other Improvements. The applicant does not have any current proposal to develop his property. The property will be given a zoning designation of U -H, Unclassifled-iioldinq. This zone does not permit development of urban uses. A rezoning to a specific development zone would be required to develop this property. _ A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The annexation will have no significant impact on the environment. Future development of the property, however. could affect the environment. if developed` with urban uses, the property would be affected by transforming a primarily - P J, agricultural property to an urban use. The existing crops would be replaced with streets, houses and other related improvements. The existing agri- cultural land would be taken out of production with little likelihood of ever returning to agricultural production. The impact of the loss of agricultuual land is mitigated by the location of the property. The property is located within the General Pian area of the City of Lodi and is designated for residential development. Annexation of a this area provides for the orderly growth of the City and allows for futt,re housing for its citizens. The area has been•inclWed in'th6 design area'of the'City!s utility system. Line and plant capacities have been engineered to service this area as it develops. The City has a specific plan for Century Boulevard, a major east -west street, along the north property tine. The City has also purchased a 23+ acre parcel fora storm drainage basin and park to service this area. The basin property is included as part of this annexation. Development of the property for residential uses could impact the Lodi Unified School District by generating additional students. The LUSO is currently exper- iencing problems of overcrowding. This can be mitigated by requiring the applicant to enter into an agreement with the LUSD to provide financial assistance to the District. The developer would pay an agreed-upon amount to help finance additional classroom space to house new students. They would aiso agree to wide by any recommendations developed by the Countywide Task- - ask - force on shoot financing. FINDINGS Based on the initial study, the City of Lodi finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment except for the impaction on the LUSD. This impaction can be mitigated by the payment of appropriate fees to the LUSD by the developer.