Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - August 4, 1982 (59)6 - CITY COUNCIL MEETIM August: 4, 1982 i PROPOSAL OF Council Rember Snider introduced the subject regarding the ASSEMBLYMAN STER- question being raised by Assemblyman Larry Stirling about LING RE STATE moving the deadline by which the State must adopt its BUDGET own budget. Following Council discussion, City Manager Glaves agreed to ca?; the League of California Cities to receive additional information concerning the subject. - ; vt k. hk��K'5r a. s,. i ,t" _ �^C, +r, 4r +f• A Z:7A.%�>; l+r � 't t i 4 j 5 . r ec„r } r � r• � �'h}l, � �..r' iY +. '�4 r L < ;. t - =T� ST .` ��n ` r�i7 F+'S �- � t� tat �' y� r •� _ 71 til t V tva riXti V '+f 75 sp'Hj� t g'7 dM a , v/ti S to w �lrmirY�srwy� a � v J �;, a � ,- i ' � `r +�,5,iµ+ko'�� �� Z✓t � �e '��`a'� <i'at kNs a�'�r'�t .��,n�t�. .~N. t ,a+=t c {"c!` a RECEIVED ('arrlomia Cures 13;91 AUG IS M 8 S z Mork Together ALICE M. MOE August 17, 193 U Y CL ERK SarramsMo, C1S 3 14 Amem- yrnan l.atty Stirling State C apstoll Rom .1133 Uaawcta, CA f5l14 Otar LaMs S7 tow you have undoubtedy recely*d a ndimber of comar+eaU from city caftkAak las etc!! " other 1oca1 government of ii 4ab whi; rem to Mir cativn artr u +rfr the a.:+iir bjc Wj, lCh ttmct�,;e Axt.*d"4 u t own Wit. '%ilei" the L"*n haws not rc—,r* ►ed tt s: parr clow 411,11till" 'Ot" Our PtAlcy Comcriinctea or our Borrd of Dlrcetars,,! thqk*4. * ygw. *Wn 1►rterest your ml& Hire to kmw whu our r;� ter! V cif such a chvwe 9t+°GuIr., "1t. ft&"iy, W* nave r'01 Jr. th@ Mean 1fftrattetl In +daptlM P"K*as at ttelr State 'nt'' a 3!ar lr flee r i gowtrvi aubverrtlos. bra tett': orQzrtt bta1tl;; %IPMt'�±e U&" u it Wn j6�one tits o! To the extem that "ccmfuAcii,+ wKenainte pm-vaUx resat jx t of;.3�e, as 4ocai go+► mmetKs a�it thn Staftl fin'1 i► �+ ftdpt W* kkish* ow Ile" f*r a v+'PA` tow Som *iiQrd { Ot %VMJ LC !9!►turn i lvcry year tQ �Q4` t3i'l� `' ' m 1Mlt . � !2: 011 that it,becgt eti F 1 kal V 1ermrrsent sub~km on anal, 6"iEvotw 1,;� , t o bc QOl3l8.FN�l ifi� Ott.$'! to frw* cWkt* , to . Vit, t31w.i.. wed muchDrat dd4 ftW to dheuts thh whR pceu at gmater, le tt at i ` ' i i ki► e� S,i-r .30 Ilk' Kenwth 3. Zmafmais Legislative nit ctor cc: City Target, City of U4 Mayor, Chy of E! C�rrho ttia= P� 1400 K STREET • SACRAMCNTO 95614 MOTEL CLAREMONT BERKELEY 94705 6J0 MLSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 702 • LOS ANG LES 80017 (916) 444.51'90 (41 1)) 643-3063 (213) 624.4934 MV F7=7ti Vk M77 r a El y .HRwr' -'70 <"Co' ., VS 1J CE{VED "«�. "M"+S�"' California Legisl atu� C]-4 "` ,�"�> RE) ,<! t 11 1982 JUL 2 6 AM 9: 2 0 l � I.i1A l.Ali(1ritJ4 vJN NN l PNl7NE ('lal M+1SSNn LARRY STIRLING ALICE M. REIMCHE ASSEMBLYMAN. SEVENTY-SEVENTH DISTRICT CITY 1' CLERK CITY OF LODI July 20, 1982 Councilmembers City of Lodi City Hall 221 West Pine Street Lodi, California 95240 Dear Councilmembers: I an currently examining alternative proposals to amend Article IV, Section 12 (c) of the State Constitution, which stipulates that the Legislature must finalize the budget by June 15 of each year. The problem with the current law is that cities and counties which are dependent upon State aid for providing basic community services, must finali=a their own budget before they know how much money they are slated to receive from the Sate. The confusion and uncertainty stemming from this situation could be alleviated by having the Legislature finalize the State budget before the city and county governments are required to do So. I would appreciate any assistance you might be able to provide regarding such a change in budget proceedings. Specifi- cally, I would appreciate knowing the date by which you would like to see the State budget finished, including your reasons for that specific dates the positive and negative aspects associated with current law; the expected fiscal impact of the proposed changes the ways in which the new proposal might alleviate old problems; the ways in which it might create raw problems, particularly in the transition year. I am withholding judgment on any specific proposal until I receive recommendations from the affected parties. I would greatly appreciate any additional suggestions you have to offer. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, LARRY I ING LS:rch ❑ )i All (AF4T( t ♦V.t ��QNi(l. CNIFf*14k 4.414 Hata (V*.) 44%%W1 ❑ -• , 1(t' 4y) etj .urt c t♦ .-.15A CA1t(*1JA v:tN1 AKW 8,141 4.1-WM .Assembly California Legisl atui'''—"El .. ED r% 1,6.,11.11_26 All 9:20 LARRY STIRLING ALICE ISI. R 11 ACHE AWNOtI•MAN. S[VINTY-SEANT11 DISTRICT u i CLERK CIT".' OF LO "I July 20, 1982 Councilmembers City of Lodi City Hall 221 West Pine Street Lodi, California 95240 Dear Councilmembers: I am currently examining alternative proposals to amend Article IV,. Section 12 (c) of the State Constitution, which stipulates that the Legislature must finalize the budget by June 15 of each year. The problem with the current law is that cities and counties which are dependent upon State aid for providing basic community services, must finalize their own budget before they know how much money they are slated to receive from the State. The confusion and uncertainty stemming from this situation could be alleviated by having the Legislat'ire finalize the State budget before the city and county governments are required to do SO. I would appreciate any assistance you might be able to provide .regarding such a change in budget proceedings. Specifi- cally, I would appreciate knowing the date by which you would like to see the State budget finished, including your reasons for that specific date; the positive and negative aspects associated with current law; the expected fiscal impact of the proposed change; the ways in which the new proposal might alleviate old problems; the ways in which it might create new problems, particularly in the transition year. I am withholding judgment on any specific proposal until I receive recommendations from the affected parties. I would greatly appreciate any additional suggestions you have to offer. Thank you for your coo,,)eration. Sincerely, LARRY I ING LS:rch