Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - July 2, 1986 (80)CITY OF LORI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTR141:NT TO: City Council FROM: City Manager DATE: June 25, 1986 SUBJECT: Speed Zoning RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance establishing speed limits as shown in Exhibit A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As previously discussed at a shirtsleeve meeting, engineering and traffic studies include the prevailing speeds determined by a radar survey and accident data. The engineering studies for the 13 streets are attached. There will be approximately (8) additional streets, plus some miscellaneous segments, brought to the City Council within the next month. Rn1kofek hit Works Director Attachments cc: Police Dept. JLR/PF/eeh > %] FILE NO. uq A. PETERSON City Manager EXHIBIT A - PROPOSED SPEED ZONES - ,TUNE 1986 STREET SEGMENT EX. PROP CH CENTRAL KETTLEMAN TO TOKAY 30 30 0 CENTRAL TOKAY TO RAILROAD 25 25 0 CHEROKEE S. CITY LIMITS TO ALMOND 5S 4S -10 CHEROKEE ALMOND TO DOLORES 45 45 0 CHEROKEE DOLORES TO VICTOR 3S 35 0 CHEROKEE VICTOR TO PIONEER 35 40 5 CHURCH KETTLEMAN TO TOKAY 30 35 5 CHURCH TOKAY TO LOCKEFORD 25 30 5 CHURCH LOCKEFORD TO TURNER 30 30 0 CLUFF LODI TO VICTOR 2S 3S 10 CLUFF VICTOR TO TURNER 25 40 15 ELM LWR SACRAMENTO TO HAM 35 3S 0 ELM HAM TO HUTCHINS 30 35 5 ELM HUTCHINS TO STOCKTON 2S 30 5 ELM STOCKTON TO CHEROKEE 3S 30 -S HOLLY MILLS TO CALIFORNIA 30 30 0 HUTCHINS HARNEY TO CENTURY 50 45 -S HUTCHINS CENTURY TO KETTLEMAN 45 4S 0 HUTCHINS KETTLEMAN TO TOKAY 35 3S 0 HUTCHINS TOKAY TO LOCKEFORD 30 30 0 HUTCHINS LOCKEFORD TO CALIFORNIA 25 2S 0 LOCKEFORD MILLS TO CHURCH 30 3S S LOCKEFORD CHURCH TO STOCKTON 2S 3S 10 LOCKEFORD STOCKTON TO E. CITY LIMIT 3S 35 0 LWR SACRAMENTO VINE TO TURNER 4S 4S 0 PINE HAM TO HUTCHINS 30 30 0 PINE HUTCHINS TO STOCKTON 25 30 5 PINE STOCKTON TO BECKMAN 30 30 0 PINE BECKMAN TO CLUFF 30 40 10 PINE CLUFF TO EAST CITY LIMIT SS 40 -15 RUTLEDGE ELM TO TURNER 30 30 0 TOK4Y HAM TO CHEROKEE 30 30 0 WOODHAVEN TURNER TO EILERS 35 30 -F r� wvcn«vc uwu rr<wrrf6 C 3!4cD 4z N REMARKS c ,, 1 -.- 51t,tJ LoGAi IoN NOt�: �-- -PACE f%1 R1 6tOP Vtt713 *Nlbu p(,f,10t;1JT RA1'4; 25 L}•={ a) [t) " R2l ) SPEf,D UµiT P,E1NSt;[v KEtt1.EN►►S '(OKAY. s zz• 4-84 ^ .�^ 30 61L A (NIPN) *fl. YVA AWDP37 $JAX� -MED" % NC R3qYIELD _4j(cN 'lG1riJF,Et3' -rpt;AY � LOOt. Z; Dut, 'fD 'I1I>r DtSfA�.t; � t...o• Rif 'tF.AFFIG 5t(oNAt,' t.r;7t Fy>J W�1�, �fm A•MV6f5 cmwT 2212 (p 2 t ODt 4Pd"I f%Afa mm µU,H ' .�----w M :h MPH °AutpEut t;At _BBTh��N PROPOSED SPEED ZONE YPIN$ �1Pubi i� ", I�1 HFA I VZ WI DISTANCE IN FEET_ r 1071 (T+ MPM ROADWAY WIDTH -- NO. OF LANES ----- MEDIAN (TYPE) TRAFFIC SIGNAL BATA w W Is 1450 A n t s' 1 C S 1-TPP, U AVE I IA NI I 1 wvcn«vc uwu rr<wrrf6 C 3!4cD 4z N `i J g 1 1 wvcn«vc uwu rr<wrrf6 3!4cD FD;D 9 OU OBS $PEED—CRITICAL .83 k 1 24 -PACE f%1 25 L}•={ a) [t) " 2h-3'1 zz• 4-84 ^ .�^ 30 2 -MED" % NC Zaj 2212 (p 2 EDCISTM SPEED ZDNE.: .�----w M :h MPH PROPOSED SPEED ZONE ao IAIP e HFA J1 LEC�EN D MPM ; —49 MCI LOW U, - - -- - LIt•�i 1 oflAL;F. ACCK)ENT$(2 ) 143+1 1 1 1 r 1 ► r r S t r t t r r (a r r 3r s r 1 1 r5 r4 r 11 3 2 t4- L V&N.-NI. 12.44 .(A2..1 4.31 D R q CITY OF LO[3� u SPEED 20NE SURVEY ••» : �/K ..... «.» .�.«. .cc Mw FVE IK WORKS (DEPARTMENT - AVL, 868004 gy Mm.+�}yrogE+2�X"�iq-M;^2T;sxy0.o5G�fi1a4�`ri1�}vS.ewAehi%FRa.'rvM'esN.ai4bM4>�a(&RNH�-�h��'tt.c-�+YT'�+'[..M..^'+b�2'Mewxm.Y iwe X+f•NL4'+1' r.. ,.r .-tee^ .�...... .r ,� t, .., x. .sr 3'?3 _-::;Sn.�Va��.S:W — .. _�W't:«:.{�.y..P�9'+"ly :' rk�e(+'fr��S#F -. i REMARKS' a LS G61� p ` Z '' u� 17p( 4 0 V ►_ JL Su,N 1.%At10iJ Ri STOP 5{GN Vcc vtA CJI) 9 R2 i 7 SP�BD. U K tt tq`'o' a . �"~ ^3a YIE:LQ hl(�t.� ,c;yr o"i`�- � ^ h, � ro �V .,iJ► ) ,�t .. 'JS. L.I�• -- --- ---• GITY UTAIT ,G Vz ut 1 I/z u► i '/z MI 1 Vz ui ' DISTANCE IN FEET ROADWAY WIDTH 5 71r, NO OF LANES 4 LA ! 6 3 44 MEDIAN (TYPE) i Lttlf%'-rl.: Mw - ''` 7_ MY wr 1DEN LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA i3fikU ? At S act •• r�► •:� rrr ' AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC gOpp baa t5 i .400 ib.'�P I DO& SPEED-CRITICAL 65N Nib 4& 4 z s .} i -PACE M N 1 • b-4 1 •4 ?I) ; a' -MEDIAN % ' O , p EXISTING SPEED ZONE A' FF M PROPOSED SPEED ZONE a$ 'M N 86 N H 4011(11 t rr ff A' MPH CR�IT�I CAL t 40 tDWC-9 uulrOf PAM sa t401. 55 1014 1 FU-4) t LIMIT 6ovTH OF CITY LtuIT. ACCIDENTSI2 1- N0. I 4 G 4 2 t iv 4 ro S z z I •1 t • A 1 112. 11 5 & 1 i 1 <. PAI C/_•/MI . Y H.Mi. I 5• 5; 321 2.55 CITY OF LODI SPEED ZONE SURVEY Deg •..r w..q+ p+. PlSbltC W4RK5 DEPARTMENT 1 86 8004 .� ( i `"-2Q+'•`�' H iy d '�'n^Y f � ` � ' $t ' . � � -• .. -:: -_- ;T°J,Y3��^'�y.�"_ _ �.i^�'�: tea.-n-.s Y�'?c - . � , �..-�y,es't'ns.�F':•ar, . r i REMARKS a w * 1V { S Y1 r1 ►. W C-10N wcntl oN wY � � •�^ � t1t�1►I � ,,t. e u �- �� � K _ �IAS•Ix race < ti hxt �S ►�bI a lb, �; �; �, i p 0 Tt<Ai G',G f6NA a 1 �.�i �iP.�.i� Oji" ra 1 is �t•W'!"o�H.vr F:;.t'��1)t RAG IV ^'' p- W Rtil.DVt+,�JC� FFCcG llcrt�r wm Ps. I' I& NI 1 i/z NI 1 i/2 m I Vz NI 1 1/2. FII DISTANCE IN FEET IF low FT , ROADWAY *1DTH Ir4f-+!,' ,tip it {q• _ . _ Mc ._ .. cn. #-H ^�+ sA' +1' ___ •: +1 NO OF LANES (+ Z ---"� T� -- 4 --►trt- -- z MEDIAN (TYPE) t)Qilt TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA P%C t. /�� rtvE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ;^t7� I an,," ^gcCi VAXf 4". sti.a' °!DO OBS SPEED-CRITICAL.95NPS a' p z2 +) 311 30 7= - PACE (%) Ne' �; .R 21. 16 2; j y r 2 'ii ;F, 'i s!o'- .( a i IQt -MEDIAN NL3� X91 3Z5 L'i mi ..... S� - ¢ EXISTING SPEED ZONE 1 26 MON oQHA4 260 NPH 9.10 F PROPOSED SPEED ZONE M MPt: 014 ?7 NON r I MPH (�&EN D ,, s p a 77 LowER aq i I,t)alt s . ._ . ACCIVEPM(2 ) 90. 1464 . z 2M 1 Z-� i t r 3 3 19 5 11 ► 3 15 1 4 11 .7-1 1 2 t KATE - Au, Mil \ FA -JA T" Z. 10 6.60 T.44=11t ttM r41i 13.'lt a CITY OF. LOE CITY SPEED ZONE SURVEY w 0%" �o.99 p.» PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT V 19ez GDu Nr 86 8 004 .w.•-.r..r:v..ns«^•-e..v....-.,.....✓...•.•....a..u...•:..nrw.eMe�O...sf+M.^•w•+r.MTwam•••n�ew•M.+ r+Pr+.�lnwsl'aertm�V�ep.klNv IYfEF•tl �e'"d&.« a ... . • s.._+_ _.. r ..n.. M .<._ ._ r ..r . :: ,.- ' sppletl WAIT"i6d ebo lliv 1/2 DISTANCE IN FEET 11'-x500' ROADWAY WIDTH 1 48' 48' NOL OF LANES 1-0 MEDIAN (TYPE) tole TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA N/A AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC, OBS. SPEED - CRITICAL.05N Af5 g4 40 4Q PACE F4 (16) -MEDIAN .50 % w t 41+ EXISTING SPEED ZONE PROPOSED SPEED ZONE a5 MPH 41) MPH MPH Ar% 01 ACCIDENTS I2 r) NO: IC104 v Pe MILL. CITY OF LODI SPEED ZONE SURVEY F acg PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -868004 xnxrA; m V REMARKS i s L eGsN D v ' REMARKS L eGsN D v ' ,� V ,I \+ N;� 61(PN LDU.TION vu t?250' " R2( Isfew LIMIT 1 r r' if ►. �•� �zt�s) y WA Q� �"RAFGIr✓ 6([,NAi. °w � !Y 1, R L •� �: •c � < �: CITY WAIT �! I tlTE' 55 KPii ':fSED .�DU111 p�_UT) .Iv,iT. F YzMI 1 1 Y2 NI Yr- 141 { %z Ml r�Ip I 1 DISTANCE IN FEET - low FT -11; ROADWAY VIDTN Ah' <G! va=ry LA' NO OF LMES MEDIAN (TYPE) TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA --ST-Ar 8 RU' 80 f:(.f « "F,cr AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC !I t,rn :;rcty.> Il co� X200 088 SPEED -CRITICAL.8S )It 4, -PACE I%) t al �+ J17".1 1 2(0 �i(, Pr' 7 3'1 '18 1_•�:"' "1L -MEDIAN W% IIh 40 25 4, - EXISTING SPEED DONE eil apH AS N,P}i 3o MFH Nl ri PROPOSED SPEED DONE 5 MP �5 MPH =30 MFH ?- 717.N --- WwER` _ t.I44T of tt7fE GJ6 ';J SRt;CT .. • .. .. __ to IFll"$ifiOf t,SftiP Y .. ACCIDENTS (2yr) No_IgN ? 1 1141 1 51 1; 31 3 d •l=TF - ILL •NI Ltl 1.8q ?to Q 51 0 .1.5 o. N.S.K.''� 6 ; r. n w. w. a«. an...0 t+r CITY OF LODI r avul�trw, �.i c., ..wr .r..r MnsNr •ct °'~ PUBtIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPEED ZONE SURVEY + o•". Vtb - a*•� +:+Telg+new!s.vera.m+.r�mt�:x.rvm.n*z�>«.�r, _ ..asan*vma me.!.v tgrv�aw+,c.x.- w-•am=awa:,rr" n�ary ,n+ 86 a ooq I: EMARKS ACCIDENTS (210 NO.- K84 I {qo, Ri STDp blloti 1.f5z o C I TY OF L O D I fz-z i ' CEO LIMIT i SPEED ZONE SURVEY o... 1186 k3q MLO E LD 6W4 G IN6rALLAtIow G PUBLIC WQRKS DEPARTMENT ucoF �Y A41 2300' I% a'°d " 1300 n "i -aoo' too rsco y m Y .h• �t.n .+ oa -. -.�r _ .= 'rr..i. _ A*x"•Ay ..-`F%�4�.f:'.YYf C%4!"•sWyxuur>�mrw..^{�i ..; MR6e+Nnt.M<'M'�i4le'MR.m ✓aR+•+ _ .a -t } i N ?2AGttG SI(,tJAL. � oc of � � LOGKEFoRD St 1/2 NI 1 Vz All 1 I/Z. m I '/2 WI ) Ih NI I 1 DISTM" IN FEET 1000 Pf 1 ROADM W WIDTH 3q' 2 42' 54 (,,0 $1' 4.2 NQ OF LANES 14 T 4 2 --- ►-I 3 4 14 2 -^--- --^-+f MEDIAN (TYPE) 140N TRAFFIC SKO" DATA FIY 7 - ALT AVERAGE DALY TRAFFIC 9 l0 4Op A 0 DO& SPEED-CRITICAL.l5 Wt V �.i3 -PACE I%) WD 1'I 2'{ • ? 1 23 6B,cla)_a 0 -MEDUW 50 % W15 1'b q U EXISTING SPEED ZONE w M47H t5 NPH N5 MEN------►� PROPOSED SPEED ZONE MP ---^►i cl), MPH1 1,:, 1 t I SPED777 ff -4a U MfA . . OF FACE ACCIDENTS (210 NO.- K84 I {qo, 1.f5z o C I TY OF L O D I , SPEED ZONE SURVEY o... 1186 PUBLIC WQRKS DEPARTMENT �Y m Y .h• �t.n .+ oa -. -.�r _ .= 'rr..i. _ A*x"•Ay ..-`F%�4�.f:'.YYf C%4!"•sWyxuur>�mrw..^{�i ..; MR6e+Nnt.M<'M'�i4le'MR.m ✓aR+•+ _ .a -t } i I 141 W7 REMARKS LE&SI40 :5iv4 L.OcAnoA e<49 JOA/AOItA 6rDP 61(PtJ P-7 61bA laP 1560' j iRi �IhaD'—�; wL a C YIeLP : 011itA A CITY LIMM 7 tioTe't 4ro MON4p%D Alvl y2 mt DISTANCE IN FEET i' , ?;,)D' ROADWAY WIDTH sz, pli NO OF LANES MEDIAN (TYPE) PlONG TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA WIA, AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 77DD (lgo) 10 4" 94500 OBS. SPEED - CRIl 41 .44 —MEDIAN rv.0 Lvl I 141 W7 qoO. I 141 W7 REMARKS ��EN� PINE �T SIGN L06AT IDN R3. STOP 22( �SfEcO L1Mli SIGV�t= at cs z { �•.. (,N('H� 2s.00' f rt ::�Y { � �. N .�I RN TSA -51C 61(AAl. ._. CITY LIMIT Yz NIl `'h MI Si 'I I/2 HI �� ti: 'h N► i i r/2 MI i DISTANCE IN FEET f -low K-0 ROADWAY VADTN NO. OF LANES MEDIAN (TYPE) �t011G TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA:3 fl EA 7-t F, AVERAGE ONLY TRAFFIC H00 ^ADO 41 b tJ0 �6z ocl, 4A00 11r00 — DBS SPEED — CRITICAL ,BS T►b E6 11�. -FACE('x,) !18 24 A4 -MEDIAN 50-% Fl 2� Z5 32 EXISTING SPEED ZONE 3DNfg 26 IAP NPH ' Mfg P14 56 V PROPOSED SPEED ZONE M�p MPH 40 HPN LEGEND M PH --- We - -- — r-PmGaL000, Et tiMIT .. op Not_ IlOtb' S5 N,PH �fi;.ED '-"TY LIM1 ACCIDENTS(2 ) 40. Iq r. 1, I I 1 i 21 z 1 1 2. 19 ( 3 I r r 1 1 6 6 a! 2 RA AGG I V •Mi. IA .Qi 10 Ab 8 9a0 hi u.2 G.9A- t -b. g °r R.S.K. . �► - .,. M Mr. NM«N b YIN c. CITY OF LO D I SPEED ZONE SURVEY a~' �/!6 •cr �'�' PUBLIC WORKS-EPARTMENT J� sr.�„r.,,r^.,..,.�,�iv++.k,.,�....,.,. o..T.,,...»�..w-....,.+-�-•..�.....,:...,>.....•...«:..s................o.....,..,,.�..wr....•.mn�...sr+nwe.ae�.-...v.«.wra+m*an+..Ww�..>ee.�s,*...s,,,.:,,..���wa.M.-,., .: s�. ,:., ..,:�r..raw.,¢:iA?Fn9.�.�HY[SCae•=3yctFYF�x.. ._..•. � r.?t>�-•��-" REMARvS ic ---- e2O ;57se>7 uulT %5LA'(Mfg) : R39 Y!cl.t� S1teN -�o vF 2125 r Notts• Ntt�N At�tDE))r. �'p>'c �, � I: "AWE IN FEET I' : 500 FT 1 , . MW AN' MADTH4f MEDIAN (TYPE) ►JONG TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ^,pp OBS SPEED -CRITICAL .83 U8 '5 ' -PACEt'Al cg z4. W -MEDIA 30 'J< ,( EXISTING SPEED ZONE. ?/a MP14 PRffKSED SPUD ZONE H - 30 MP MPH =r - - c R171GA1. SPe;FA OF 49— = :- : _ ACCIDENTS (2 ) 90-1464 1 T ► ! f ? 1 7 - itP.TS—A". Milt- V[ .-ML I13.88 PJ -.TS - A". a5+ �0 .. N °' NNM ..,..«......, CITY ©.F LODI , SPEED ZONE SURVEY rwN ww w.«« ` aN r PUBIC WORKS DEPARTMENT'- 86 8 004 w m r REMARKS %ct 5 zt Le Ge-NI 0 SIc,N LOCAT10iJ wmwmQ L , L L=.=._�--j ,t tp R,�j ,J is f I R1. STOIC it�N i T 1L Ax T 1 itT '� Irxl]� rT 4�4• iT Ti 6IYl f JL f fi /050' �', 1"o R39 .Yieto 51(�N (MPH) alotloco g �' 0 `(1 CirODG, ?f Nod w( oNc �wl�, TCKA � ST I 1th NI I 1/Z ml 1 I/2 M 1 1 I/2 w. DISTANCE IN FEET ROADWAY WIDTH 1 I NO OF LANES 2 �; MEDIAN (TYPE) Iy,XiF TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA DPS 2 ASC. AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC loco 4000 4000 r! 11 OOS SPEED-CRITICAL.. Wt zy -PAM M E' ac•Y 22-?a t11 7»" *3 1b 11EXISTM SPEED ZONE 7ti L< 3o Ltfif PROPOSED SPEED ZONE 36 MPH 30 MPH MPH LE GEN D aL %L .ra aI t� c6 ACCIDENTS I2 rt N0. - iq 4 I I I b I I 2 Si1 I 2 I acro _ AGf . Murveil,-ml. f 4.04 -- 2-- 014ON 25.32 7.F 4 S R.S.K. — M •�Nw a..• p«wN of - - °• CITY OF LODI SPEED ZONE SURVEY wa. 4/06 . , .►ww rr.rw tMm,« o.w PL1RliC M/C%RKS DEPARTMENT