The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - June 19, 1985 (77)c Plan USAN JpAi 7IN w copy of the Proposed r�Couunncil'sJperrusal. San Joaquin County was presented grRATBGIC Supervisor George Barber had attended an earlier Informal PLAN Informational Meeting of the Council and reviewed the proposed pian. Council was apprised that this process, linking the efforts of representatives of private enterprise with public sector administrators and elected officials, is a proven one and designed to produce several benefits. It will: c Focus canamity efforts on the key factors in San Joaquin's future U Improvea cmamications between the various City and County goverrmnts 0 Improve camxmications between the business eantnmlty and the public sector 0 Develop an action plan and implementation process for shaping San Joaquin's future o Provide a business conrnmity voice in the public sector planning process that is as acceptable and objective as possible -5- LES ansa s.zolas3 Jatllo pus as 1L • sveau palsaodaoouiun pus sailto 9141 2uou2e dlgsaaulaud u 2utuuoJ Jo 1902SAMOD atll ut uotluaotaalap u pue 'suaallud luaui&oldw pue Aalsnpul buL&*wW `slJigs olgd13j2O ap Al lnoqu jg2noaq uaaq set; ix&mtp sites •sat;aA ual Is -ed agl ut Alunoo aql u1 paouataadxa a2we Jo lunauM luaJ2 aql aano uJaouoo Jo asnuoaq Alunoo uinbuor ueg uL un2aq sum ss000ad 2uiuueld 31201uals aql `MDTAJaAo loa[oad aql ut pauiul&a SV V861 `51 lsnaW PanulluOO yp b Y kY X i i FJ a tRyN 237 Continued August 15, 1984 As explained in the Project Overview, the strategic planning process was begun in San Joaquin County because of concern over the great amount of change experienced in the county in the past ten years. This change has been brought about by demographic shifts, changing industry and employment patterns and a deterioration in the County's goal of forming a partnership among the cities and unincorporated areas. These and other factors have contributed to a variety of problems such as deteriorating physical infrastructure, loss of businesses and jobs and so on. The amount of funds requested represents a per capita division, with the County being asked to represent the unincorporated areas and each incorporated city for their populations. The City of Tracy has already considered our request and allocated their share of the total budget of $165,000. In addition to requests of each of the cities and County, the private sector in each city has to provide funding on a similar basis. No single government could address all the demands for services its constituents might place upon it. Similarly, no plan could address every problem and set forth an implementable solution. It is through strategic planning that efforts are canbined, a common view of the future is developed, and implementable solutions are identified. For these reasons, and with a sincere desire to contribute to the well-being of current and future residents of the city of Lodi and Sari Joaquin County, the management conmittee of the San Joaquin County Strategic Plan respectfully request your appropriation of $10,050.00. �g �Y r - "15 ryt zU r� x' ,ec,ya y Y t Mr. George A. Chimiklus, Coordinator, addressed the Council regarding the matter, and responded to questions as were posed by the Council. Following discussion, on motion of Council Member Olson, Reid second, Council appropriated $10,050.00 for funding of the subject plan, contingent upon the private sectors participation for its projected carmitment, and the participation of the other cities in the County. The motion was carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Pinkerton, Reid, and Snider (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Hindman Almont : Counei 1 Mmbera - None Mirthor, folIvwing udditicna1 diesetmoiex►, on rrr)tion of Counc;l I Nkvi)cr Olson, Raid sacsorvi, C;ounci l ;tuthori zed the esl►proprlution of thatio f►u►ds ($10,050.00) wt►an tboy arcs ready to be d i sixi rtsed to be madie f ran t 1w Ge,-r*rs i i'urrd (:11)arat ing Hops srve3, 'lha ny)t inn curried by the fol 10wing v0to: Ay"t' Nowi ; AI►aanl ; Wincs 1 I Nkid)o rss -° of aqn , no i d atui fits i deer (Nkr yor ) rnuusll Nkilbara - llirsclrnar►, or►d 1'inlwrtun 0►unc:1 1 Nkilbef.h Now 91 Task START-UP PHASE A. Start-up and Orientation B. Review Existing Data, Synthesize and Fill Data Gaps Time TIME SCHEDULE OF TASKS, REPORTS AND WORKSHOPS ame Report Dates* Workshop Dates May 20th - May 31st June 3rd June 7th June 10th - July 5th June 28th July 3rd ECONOMIC AUDIT - PHASE I C. Analysis of Local Market July 8th - July 12th Conditions July 19th D. Perform System Assessment/ July 22nd - August 2nd Analyze Competitve Position August 9th STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT - PHASE II E. Establish Development August 12th - August 30th Priorities I September 6th F. Evaluate Strategic Alternatives and Expected Outcomes July 17th July 18th (Policy Group) August 7th August 8th (Policy Group) September 4th Objectives September 5th _ (Policy Group) ` September 9th - September 20th September 25th Options September 27th September 26th (Policy Workshop) G. Produca Recommended Action September 30th - October 11th Plan November 1st November 1st * Week Ending October 16th Draft Plan Final Plan Mi d EXHIBIT A,: Strategy Team Respon amities S k x i - Approve Mork Program ' interviews and Task Force - Schedule Debriefings - Validate. Findings and Review Data i tiro , Synthesis - Set Research Agenda f - Identify and Document Needs - Identify Competitors Goals``' - Define -Focus on Strategy Efforts - Establish Criteria for Targeting y , - Screen for Target Businesses - Establish Priorities Strategy Components >:<" -Select - Commit Resources - Establish Milestones organizational Structures - Define 'Responsibilities and (Public,Debriefing) E s u - ...,. NA SCHED� OF TASKS, REPORTS AND WORKSHOPS MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER _TASK START-UP PHASE A. Decision -Making Process - Finalize Study Design Report - Orientation Workshop June 3rd B. Review/Synthesis of Data - Review Existing Data - Task Force Debriefing Report on Workshop to - Interviews Data Synthesis Review Database - - Business Surveys July 3rd ECONOMIC AUDIT - PHASE I C. Analysis of Local Report, Market Conditions - Location factors Workshop July 17th - Linkage Analysis - "Do -Nothing" Scenario Policy Group - Needs Workshop Workshop July 18th D. System Assessment Report, - Competitive Position Workshop - Barriers/Potentials August 8th - Goals Workshop Policy Group Workshop Aug. 9th STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT PHASE II } E. Establish Development Report Workshop - Priorities September 4th - Market Potentials Policy Group - Business Targets Workshop - Objectives Workshop September Sth / 03 { m ; 2 . � J � TASK MY JUNE JULY AUGUST ? STRATEGY DEVEO M N ƒ PHASE II (continued) . \` \ F. Evaluate Strategic . Alternatives and Expected Outcomes _ - Resource Analysis - Tools Inventor - Requirements Anal/sis 1 - Options Workshop f G. Produce Recommended ' tion Plan - Draft Report / { - Implementation Workshop \\ - Submit Final Report P. 2 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER Report, Workshop Sept. 25th, Policy Group Workshop Sept. 26th Report Final Report Draft Final Plan, Workshop Oct. 16th