HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 17, 1981 (42)CITY COUNCIL 0
3
JAWS A. T. MURPHY. or . Mayor CITY O F LO D I
R08f Ri G. MLMPHY, MayPro Tem
RICHARD L. HUGHES
WAITER KATNKH CITY HAIL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 320
JAMES W. PINKERTON, Jr. LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241
(209) 334-5634
June 19, 1981
Mr. Gerald F. Scott
Executive Officer
Local Agency Formation Commission
County Courthouse, Room 153
222 East Weber Avenue
Stockton, CA 95202
HENRY A. GLAVES. ►r.
City Manager
ALICE M. RE&NICHE
City Clerk
RONALD M. STEIN
City Attorney
Re: "EAST SIDE WINERY" REORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF LODI AND DETACIiMENT
FRM THE MOKE DMNE RURAL FIR$ DISTRICT
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find the following documents pertaining to the aforementioned
reorganization and detachment:
I. Three (3) copies of "Justification of Proposal".
2. Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected
territory - consistent with standards acceptable to the County
Surveyor's Office.
3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected
agencies ;area and vicinity maps).
4. Filing fee of $300.00
5. Seven (7) copies of Resolution No. 81-74 - "Resolution of the Lodi
City Council for the application to the San Joaquin County Local
Agency Formation Commission in the matter of the proposed "East Side
Winery" reorganization, including the detachment of certain territory
within the area proposed for annexation to the City of Lodi.
Also enclosed please find a copy of the Initial Study.
We have also enclosed herewith the subject Notice of Determination and the
Environmental Documentation.
Please do not hesitate to call, should you need additional information
regarding this matter,
Very truly yours,
Doreen L. Gaugel
Deputy City Clerk
Enc.
^' JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
Reorstanization of Chansce of Organization,A£fect"ig Local Agencies
Filed frith Local Agency Formation Comission of San Joaquin County
c/b Dewey E. Mansfield, Executive Officer
County Courthouse, Room 153 May 28, 1981
222 East Weber Avenue Phone: (209) 944-2196 Date:
Stockton, California 95202
The undersigned, on behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby give notice
of intention to:
❑ incorporate a city
Q form a district
® annex territory to an agency
(� consolidate existing agencies
❑ disincorporate a city
p dissolve a district
❑ detach territory from an agency
To further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following:
1. Three (3) copies of this dompleted "Justification of Proposal"
2.' Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected territory
consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Office
3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies
(maps to be no smaller than 8k" x 11" which is the most preferable size and
*hall be no larger than 18" x 26".
4. Filing b processing fees in accordance with LAFCO fee schedule
The following persons .(uot*to exceed three) are t8 be mailed copies of the Executive
Officer's. Report and notice of commission hearings regarding the subject Proposal.
ALICE REIMCHE, CITY CLERK, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
(name) (address)
JAMES B. SCHROEDER, Community Development Director, ^21 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
name address
BEN SCHAFFER, AGENT, P. 0. Box 667, Lodi, CA 95240
name address
COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS signed
If a question is not applicable to your proposi), you may so state.
1. Local agency organization changes hereby proposed --designate affected agencies and -
annexations by name:
REQUEST ANNEXATION OF 10 ACRE PARCEL (APN o49-o4o-19) TO THE CITY OF LODI AND.
DETACHMENT FROM THE MOKELUMNE RURAL FIRE DISTRICT
"EAST SIDE WINERY REORGANIZATION"
2. Statutory provisions governing proceedings:
TITLE 6, DIVISION 1 (COMMENCING WITH SEC. 56000) OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE DISTRICT REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1965.
r Page 1
. Do proposed boundaries create an island or corridor of unincorporated territory?
NO
4. Do proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ownership?
NO
S. Land area affected: square miles •015" acres 10
6. Population in subject area: 0 7. Number of registered voters: 0
8. Registered voter density (per acre): 0 9. Number of dwelling units: 0
10. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years:
0
11. Present land use of subject area:
VINEYARD
12. What is the intended development of this area:
INDUSTRIAL
13. Present zoning:
COUNTY: ttntgri Protected A
13A. COUNTY GENERAL PLAN: Agriculture
14. Describe proposed caning changes:
CITY: M-2
14A. CITY GENERAL PLAN: Heavy Industrial
15. Assessed value of land: $ 26.010 °
16. Assessed value of improvements: $ 510
17. Value.of publicly owned land in area: $ N/A
18. Covernmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available:
NONE
19. What alternative mec:_sures would provide services listed in Item 18 above?
N/A
20. What modifications must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to
provide services initiated by this proposal?
NONE
21. What approximate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Item 20 above?
N/A
22. How will such costs be met?
N/A
23. Will provisions of this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency`
or affected property? _
NO
24. ® Check here if you are submitting further comments and evaluations on additional pages.
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION.
Page 2
_.,.«.....,......_....,_•Y_.,,..r �..�-.... .. . __....__tipt..en�y, ;°:F xv...?`s,fi':,w.n.:n.....,mA.�-� � �•"�,.,
EAST SIDE WINERY
Reorganization
A. portion of the Northeast and Southeast Quarters of Section 6,
Township 3 Nor.th Range 7 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the North .line of Stt)te Highway -12 (Victor
Road) at its intersection with the Northerly extension of the West line of
PARCEL "A" as show on map filed July 28, 1976 in Book 3 of Parcel Maps,
page 69, San Joaquin County Records, said point being also a point in
NOTTINGHAM ADDITION as annexed to the City of Lodi September 21, 1977 by
Resolution No. 4391; thence South l0 06' 00" East along the West line of
said PARCEL "A" and the existing City Limits line to the Southwest corner
of said PARCEL "A", thence North 890 51' 00" East, along the South line
of said PARCEL "A" and the existing City Limits line, 680.50 feet to the
southeast corner of said PARCEL "A", thence North 10 06' 00" West along
the East line of said PARCEL "'A", and the northerly extension of said
East line, to a point in the North line or said State Highway 12 (Victor
Road); thence South 890 51' 00" West, along said North line, 680.50 feet
to the point of beginning.
Containing 11.2 acres more or less.
5/81
p.
t
_.. �_._.._,__.�._.---�-=–w-=-----�-�-.�,.,�......�.,v..,.....n._ �.,.�-mss—--.�::..�,:_�.._..._.._
r ---
r:
o
fl t •
331
cum r N r
C'A�ItNOr $f iM PROY�1�
n �u[ re YH,rlr eer1/omalN �
OF MIS 0*161ARA.
D
t:gRM(RS b MERCHANTS t3AgNKEast - Side Winery oae44/l?i'
� CY CFr•ErRA1 U: 'ORrr:r, 7(�
:O" CALIaOkULA P.O. BOX 440 t•= �i(
LODI, Cf UFORNIA 43741 e
6-22-81 _ •. ib
EAST -SIDE 106,*kKt`.t
J.AFC'J ,
� - .. - � ,. _ i• nay •..r* i .w �
2000 70981p.*.1: i i i0a1.4 it: oo0�o00& ' r« ;u ► � ' ' � �
,. - .,,E ` q� .1 � � f'a ��14•i 4 t<� -
File #br annexation••10 ticresj'rinc and
to Cii}' of Lodi. r �. 1x , ,,� r• F
t i, r' .re+ ti AAit j i 4r1YI,� s�•
. .. i:, •� .Si r{:. ",11Di ..4;LA{ 4F9i'►��S,.t �,il1k
r v -qt}iE r 3 tiD - t
Z _t
ill 1�z
17
Alc i=
r�i•. ! r - 1 ��1 I i •, :i ri'tal�l)i^t1iii
"4'.v . t y ::.>,' .'. +: .,„r+v ',` y'�id `♦C •• ;; it :.ti"�: Ftj �" ,�.•4"�
J1 1C41s `�{. is►N" Vii:. :z'DDDst .1.i61l..
pt pl►iE RE .tS� Ryi ; Ott, - 7; L 7.v g" t
�t ':,.�Sti+ {Iit�;r ifs, iiFR�tstPa�tiit -atilt E -! 31x711.3
♦. c;F :;Y.«+ i it "f -r,, ri�:4 yM lw w4 - r d•nL Iv:
} Y.,
RESOLUTION NO. 81-74
RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROPOSED "EAST SIDE WINERY" REORGANIZATION
INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY
WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO
THE CITY OF LODI
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District
Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title 6
(commensing with Section 56000) of the California Government
Code, and;
WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organiza-
tion is the annexation of the City of Lodi of an area comprising
10 acres, more or less, and the withdrawal of said 10 acres
from the Mokelumne Rural Fire District and described and
depicted in Exhibit "A".
WHEREAS, no other counties, cities or districts are
affected, and;
WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the
City of Lodi and detached from the Mokelumne Rural Fire District
is uninhabited;
WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by
this reorganization, and;
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows;
(1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban
confines of the City and will generate service
needs substantially similar to that of other in-
corporated urban areas which require municipal
government service.
(2) Annexation to the City of Lodi of the subject
area will result in improved economics of scale
in government operations while improving coordina-
tion in the delivery of planning services.
(3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of San
Joaquin will benefit from the proposed reorganiza-
tion as a result of savings to the County by
reduction of County required services in unincor-
porated but urban oriented area.
81-74
-1-
(4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the
City of Lodi is geographically, socially, econo-
mically, and politically part of the same urban
area of which the City of Lodi is also a part.
(5) The subject area is within the Lodi sphere of
influence.
(6) Future inhabitants of a City residential sub-
division in the subject area will gain immediate
response in regard to police and fire protection,
unlimited City garbage and trash collection
service, street lighting service, a modern sewer
system, other municipal services, and improvement
of property values.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Lodi that the San Joaquin County Local Agency
Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the proposed
"East Side Winery" reorganization which includes annexation o€
10 acres from the Mokelumne Rural Fire District as described
and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. This is all
subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
Dated: June 17, 1981
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 81-74 was passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi
in a regular meeting held June 17,,1981 by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - Hughes, Katnich, and McCarty
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - Murphy and Pinkerton
DOREEN L. GAUGEL
Deputy City Clerk
81-74
-2-
EXHIBIT "A"
EAST SIDE WINERY
Reorganization
A portion of the Northeast and Southeast Quarters of Section 6,
Township 3 North Range 7 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the North line of State Highway 12 (Victor
Road) at its intersection with the Northerly extension of the West line of
PARCEL "A" as shown on map filed July 28, 1976 in Book 3 of Parcel naps,
page 69, San Joaquin County Records, said point being also a point in
NOTTINGHAM ADDITION as annexed to tohe City of Lodi September 21, 1977 by
Resolution No. 4391; thence South 1 06' 00" East along the West line of
said PARCEL "A" and the existing City Limits line to the Southwest earlier
of said PARCEL "A"; thence North 890 51' 00" East, along the South line
of said PARCEL "A" and the existing City Limits line, 680.50 feet to the
southeast corner of said PARCEL "A', thence North 10 06' 00" West along
the East line of.said PARCEL "A', and the northerly extension of said
East line, to a point in the North line of said State Highway 12 (Victor
Road); thence South 890 51' 00" West, along said North line; 680.50 feet
to the point of beginning.
Containing 11.2 acres more or less.
5/81
EXHIBITIt
1 7
MAY
• 1 NOTTINGHAM ADDIT16N
s
oil
~ EASTSIDE WINERY REORGANIZATION
,; 1�
t
IA
■gam'�� =1 ��::lN�IjS Ztiil
aE3 :� • zil'Ti9ii Ctkm iiSY�
�... ` ..�
■0 Au ?, E'�� �M �W �J�i,yyi��� r��IiD��U�E'�A•���"'(R��l��� �
e�
Ing" �a c� rwIrsru awru: � •••
1 {8b7 lid rig 02 :DiH2fi a arrr
� !J � �ta1� �
�:�s�� '
War-
Himmom
as ! U�IttSa �;�i
Zm
93
Nile III
®■
g� �a jjjjTTTTs
mi���•n I
i
1.
2.
3•
environmental Assessment
INITIAL STUDY
PROJECT TITLE '—Eastside Winery Reorganization (Annexation to City of Lodii_ _
LOCATION APN 049-040-19 - southwest corner Victor Road (St. Rte. 12) and CCT Track
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annexation of 10 acres to the City of Inch and detachment
from the Moke l umne' Rural Fire District.
General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed
(A) Heavy Industrial; (B) Heavy Industrial
Site *description and surrounding land use Currently in vineyard. North:'house
and vineyard; South and West- vineyard -however, currently processing industrial
subdivision proposal;.Ecist: CCT.Tracks.and Eastside Winery.
Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) County - IPA= (B) City_- M-2.
Will
the Project Have a Sign+ficant Effect
Yfirough Any of the Following Impacts�l
Yes No
'.-Maybe'
a.'.Substantial
alteration of natural topography, soil
,. ,
or subsoil features. .. •
"I`
x
b.•
Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality*.".
c.'
Substantially deplete surface'�or'groundwater
resources. ....r......... ... ........................
d.
Substantially Interfere wit'A groundwater flow
•
or recharge............... .... ..........:........;:
e.:
Cause a significant affect related to flood, erpslon
:.:.or.-slltation:...........'
........................
- -
f.: -Substantial
interference with the habitat of any
Y .•
"
.
species of fish, wildlife or plant ........ ..........
• X
-.. .•• •.•
-
g.
Violate amMent air quality standards or create
FS
substantial air. emissions or' objectionable odors......
x
h.
Substantially increase ambient noise or glare-
levei for adjoining areas .................... . ..
_'
x '
1.
Substantial reduction of existing cropland. ........
;..�_
•-'-'� -''
Expose individuals orproperty 'to geologic, pubT is i ►;
i • • �u� .:..
•,. , `a
health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards......
;,_„ x
-
'. - .. . � ,.. i�; ;�:. _•i: i, ..,
f•`'fes i�: .:; ;�_�• �" ,.•
....:�_-o
•1:�. ... 'fir. - '.
.. ,,, .�a•
.:•. _ .i%#tiiraC"
1
Yes No Maybe
i
k< Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
effect............................................... x i
1. Result in the disruption or alteration of an
archeological., historical or paleontological site.... x
4
m> Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in
x
anynatural resources... .............................
n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
fuelor energy..................i.................... x
o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm
drain,.electrical lines or x
public roads ..............
p. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
.public services such as schools or fire or police x
protection ...........................................
q.. Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking x
availability or traffic safety..
r. Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
ment of population'.....* ::::..:....:...:............:.. ;. x
s. Result in. -an alteration or conflict with existing or
planned land uses ...................... x
t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of
the City of Lodi .................................... x
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: Those items checked as possible impacts
pertain specifically to potential future development of the parcel and not the action
of theannexation, which is the current project. fhese potential impacts and their
mitigation are discussed i n EIR 75-2, certified by the City Planning Commission on
April 14,' 1975.
.Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by Initial Study:
Discussed in EIR 75-2. - '-
RECOMMENDATION
Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration •.='�
Future urbanization of this annexation area is covered in EIR 75-2; certified
by the City Planning Commission April 14, 1975.
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Environment i Review Officer
.•t
DateRaw-
2
NOTICE OF DETERM NATION
LEAD AGENCY: City of Lodi Community Development Departs-ient
221 West Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
TO: ® Secretary for Resources FROM: CITY OF LODI
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311
Sacramento, CA 95814
® County Clerk -
County of San Joaquin
SUBJECT: Filing of notice of Determination in compliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
e
EAST SIDE WINERY REORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE: (Annexation to City of Lodi)
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER:
The City of Lodi has made the following determinations regarding this project:
1. The project has been approved by the Lead Agency.
❑ disapproved
2. The project ❑ will have a significar.`. effect on the environment.
will riot
3. ® An Environmental Impact Report *has been prepared for this project.
JSEE NO. 6)
4. FiIX A statement of overriding considerations is attached.
5. ❑ A Negative Declaration has` been prepared for this project and a copy
is attached.
6. Potential impacts and their mitigation are discussed In EIR 75-2,
certified by the City Planning Commission on April 14P '1975-
-
DATE: June 19, 1981