HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 17, 1981 (59)da ^�tY y3
�4R
r
"_ 4 �'t �` Wc' 2 ty. z Ys ��P t ,E�i a w» e 4 i x .Fere < .✓ r..'>' t. '' t .°p' � ' Tf{
E� ,,��....,, L •N� Z. d Jt..t C t•L'S 1 S
l n t- vc Y#`•"° 4 a ,� L t�C-4'..'F ' -Tw`P 'Ek y 1 `z t
ti t ? }
`z 2 �r 3.y, a'� r r { - ,3•...n?»�^-�' 2r t�,_'s.^` 'r'-�'7
h i � r k -� x� ,� c, .t�4 u w�.�„��. � 1,;: a< 'u, t'aE,Iti^r •+--. ' -s�Y 4..; 3 y,F 1. ° ,
- � - w k a ,,,' _- t� �-�..,� `.+j" .q y R '`x�,.,.:..',°�.T � 5. _ '+. e2 v � # "<- .* t r wM ��`: t. y zX � •� � ,
{�'.��_..: .-. �-,_..._ .w-. -..,_.. r-..._.,e,:.._.,._:Y,._,.�-,_.._.�.A �- �,�=�,., _.,.3�_.--�.;:Y� � 1._.. it.&�?.._ ,a:"ssi,{/..a`4...-�..:,.jr�A, .-cx s�. -. .t 4..in�.�'.x._: �Fc_ . _. _•3
-`' p
•
CITYtOUNCIL HENRY A CRAVES. Jr.
• City Manager
ROBERT MURPHY. Mayor Pro Tem CITY OF LODI ALICE M RE IMCHF
RICHARD 1. HUGHES CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET City C"
WALTER KATNICH POST OfFICE BOX 320 RONALD M STEIN
JAMES W. PINKERIC-N. If LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 City Attorney
(209) 3345634
June 19, 1981
Mr. Gerald F. Scott
Executive Officer
Local Agency Formatio:a Commission
County Courthouse, Room 153
222 East Weber Avenue
Stockton, CA 95202
Re: "TONNE REORGANIZATION NO. 2" ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI AND
DETACHMENT FROM THE WOODBRIDGE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
WOODBRTDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND WATER USERS CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find the following documents pertaining to the afore-
mentioned reorganization and detachment:
1. Three (3) copies of "Justification of Proposal".
2. Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected
territory - consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's
office.
3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected
agencies (area and vicinity maps).
4. Filing fee of $300.00
5. Seven (7) copieL of Resolution No. 81-76 - "Resolution of the Lodi
City Council for the Application to the San Joaqui,a County Local Agency
Formation Commission in the Matter of the Proposed "Towne Reorganisation
No. 2", including the Detachment of Certain Territory Within the Area
Proposed for Annexation to the City of Lodi".
Also enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration.
We have also enclosed herewith the subject Notice of Determination and the
Environmental Documentation.
Please do not hesitate to call, should you need additional information
regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,
Z .i Q r.t, )l_ 1JOLt1JR _U ,
Doreen L. Gaugel �
Deputy City Clerk
Enc.
4
/ 0
Do proposed boundaries create an island or corridor of unincorporated territory?
NO
4. Do proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ownership?
NO
-5. Land area affected: square :wiles - acres 151+
0.
6.
Population
in subject area:
12-15
7. Number of registered voters: 8
8.
Registered
voter density (per
acre):
•05 9. Number of dwelling units: 6
10. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years:
500 • -1000 .
11. Present land use of subject area:
AGRICULTURE a RESIDENTIAL
120 What is the intended development of this area:
THE AREA IS DVI RaNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IN THE LODI GENERAL PLAN.
13. Present toning:
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY - I -PA & GA -1
Describe proposed zoning changes:
U-H..UNCLASSIFIED HOLDING
Assessed value of land: 225,515.00
Assessed value of improvements: $ 381,962.00
Value of publicly owned land in area: $ -0
Governmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available:
CITY OF LODI WOULD PROVIDE POLICE b FIRE PROTECTION. OTHER SERVICES WOULD ONLY
BE REQUIRED IF THE PROPERTIES ARE DEVELOPED.
What alternative measures would provide services listed in Item 18 above?
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., W.F.D., a PRIVATE WELLS AND SEPTIC TANKS.
What modifications must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to*
provide services initiated by this proposal?
NONE AT PRESENT. WHEN DEVELOPED, VARIOUS UTILITIES WILL BE EXTENDED TO SERVE
THE PROPERTIES AS REQUIRED.
What approximate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Item 20 above?
NO ESTIMATE.
How will such costs be met?
DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR EXTENDING LINES AND MAKING IMPROVEMENTS AT HIS
EXPENSE WITH SOME POSSIBLE CITY PARTICIPATION.
Will provisions of. this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency
or affected property?
NO
24. Q Check here if you are submitting further comments and evaluations on additional pages
� I
TOWNE REORGANIZATION NO. 2
A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 3,
North Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, and the South-
west and Southeast Quarters of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range
6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of KENNEDY -TAYLOR ADDITION
as annexed to the City of Lodi September 6, 1978 by City of Lodi
Resolution No. 78-66; thence North 000 03' 00" West, along the
East line of the WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL, and the West
line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, 1107.5 feet, more or
less, to the Southwest corner of that 7.7/100 acre parcel of land
�.. described in deed recorded May 2, 1893, in Book "A" of Deeds,
Volume 58, page 209; thence North 660 00' OO'' East, 251.00 feet;
thence North 240 00' 00" East, 97.00 feet to a point in the South
line of TURNER ROAD, said point lying South 890 40' 00" East,
267.00 feet from the West line of said Northwest Quarter; thence
Northeasterly to a point in the North line of said TURNER ROAD,
said point lying South 890 40' 00" East, 321.00 feet from the
West line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 34; thence along
the right of way line of the WOODBRiDgE IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL
" f
f 00 feet;
the following 9 courses; (1) North 4a ,5 00 East, 524• ,
(2) North, 796.00 feet; (3) South 83 35' 00" East, 788.50 feet;
(4) South, 29.00 feet; (5) South 89 50' 00" East, 680.00 feet;
8 0
(6) North 43 35' 00" EasS, 250.00 feet; (7) North 7 25' 04" East,
492.00 feet; (8) North 65 50' 00" East, 140.00 feet; (9) North
67° 30' 00" Ea8t, to a point in the East line of LILAC STREET;
thence South 9 48' 30" West, along said East line to a point in the
North line of the South one-half of said Southeast Quarter of
Section 34; thence South 890 43' 00" West, along said North line,
660.92 feet to a point in the West line of said Southeast Quarter;
' thence South 10 49' 00" East, along said West line, 1292.40 feet
to a point in the existing City Limits line of the City of Lodi,
said point lying 30.00 feet North of the South line of said
Section 34; thence West, parallel to said South line and along
said City Limits line, 765.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel to
the East line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 and along said
City limits line, 660.00 feet; thence easterly, parallel to the
North line of said Quarter and along said City Limits line, 725.00
feet to a point in the West line of LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD; thence
southerly, along said West line and along the existing City Limits
line 919.75 feet; thence continuing along said City Limits line
the following 6 courses: (1) Wgst, 483.83 feet; (2) South 1 22' 00"
West, 188.00 feet; (3) North 86 58' 00" West, 121.00 feet; (4)
North 0 02' 00" East, 230.00 feet; (5) North 88 46' 00" West,
158.00 feet; (6) North 880 31' 00" West, 643.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGI*;ki 'iG.
Containing 151.1 acres, more or less.
r
Tom RANCH � � V,;cE ¢
J-693 IL TURIs-ER RD. 369-5165 / r7
LODL CA 95240 ✓['%
JUN 1 %1 1981 90ms"
lz)
--I 2 -Tr
TO THR eco
ORDER OY -J $ 300*00
THE.`. 111 !. �� ---- ---.
DOLLARS
fbpmm &TffepchanhBank
Of "INTN^L cKWON"m
LODI. CALIFORNIA
Fort-._
10000 l 200 e1: 12 i Wig LI: 00•„ L 3484snale
RBSOLUTION NO. 81-76
RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
APPLICATION,TO THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROPOSED *TOWNE REORGANIZATION NO. 2"
INCLUDING THE DETACH?flM OF CERTAIN TERRITORY
WITH THE AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO THE
CITY OF LODI
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District
Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title 6
(counnensing with Section 56000) of the California Goverment
Code, ands
WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organize -
tion is -the annexation of the City of Lodi of an area comprising
151 acres, more or less, and the withdrawal of said 1.51 acres
from the, Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District, the Wood
bridge Irrigation District and Water Users Conservation District,
and described and depicted in Exhibit "A";
WHEREAS, no other counties, cities or districts are I
affected, and;
WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the i
City of Lodi and detached from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection
District, the Woodbridge Irrigation District and Water Users
Conservation District is uninhabited;
WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by
this reorganization, and;
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows:
(1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban
confines of the City and will generate service
needs substantially similar to that of other in-
corporated urban areas which require municipal
government service. -
(2) Annexation to the City of Lodi of the subject area
will result in improved economics of scale in
government operations while improving coordination
in the delivery of planning services.
(3)
as a result of savings to the County by reduction
of County required services in unincorporated but
urban oriented area.
(4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the
City of Lodi is geographically, socially, econo-
mically, and politically part of the same urban
area of which the City of Lodi is also a part.
(5) The subject area is within the Lodi sphere of
influence.
(6) Future inhabitants of a City residential sub-
division in the subject area will gain immediate
response in regard to police and fire protection,.
unlimited City garbage and trash collection
service, street lighting service, a modern sewer
system, other municipal services, and improvement
of property values.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Lodi that the San Joaquin County Local Agency
Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the proposed
"Towne Reorganization No. 2" which includes annexation of 151
acres from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District, the
Woodbridge Irrigation District and Water Users Conservation
District as described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. This is all subject to the aforementioned terms and
conditions.
Dated: June 17, 1981
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 81-76 was passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular
meeting held June 17, 1981 by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - Hughes, Katnich and McCarty
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - Murphy and Pinkerton
.
DOREEN L. GAUGEL
Deputy City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
j.
TOWNE REORGANIZATION 90. 2
v7.
A portion of the North%-.vTrAst Quarter of Section 3, -inShip 3,
North Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, and the South-
west and Southeast Quarters of Section 34, Township 4 North, Range
6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of KENNEDY -TAYLOR ADDITION
as annexed to the City of Lodi Septem9er 6, 1978 by City of Lodi
Resolution No. 78-66; thence North 00 03' 00" West, along the
East line of the WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL, and the West
line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, 1107.5 feet, more or
Tess, to the Southwest corner of that 77/700 acre parcel of land
described In deed recorded May 2. IA93, in Book "A" of Deeds,
Volume 50, page 9 20 ; thence North 66 00' 00" East, 251.00 feet;
thence North 240 001 00" East, 97.00 feet to a point in the South
line of TURNER ROAD, said point lying South 89° 40- DO-- East,
267-00 feet from the West I Ine of said Northwest Quarter; thence
Northeasterly to a point k the North line of said TURNER ROAD,
said point lying South 89 401 00" East, 321.00 feet from the
West line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 34; thence along
the right of way line of the WOODBRIDgE IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL
the following 9 courses; (1) North 41 151 00" East, 524.00 feet;
(2) North, 796.00 feet; (3) South 82 35 East, 788.50 feet;
(4) South, 20.00 feet; (5) South 89 50' 00" East 60.00 feet;
(6) North 430 35* 00" EasS, 250-00 feet; (7) North 7 25' 0011 East,
492.00 feet; (8',l North 65 501 0011 East, 140.00 feet; (9) North
67° 30' 0011 Ear, to a point In the East line of LILAC STREET;
thence South 9 48' 30" West, along said East line to a point in the
North line of the South one-half of said Southeast Quarter of
Section 34; thence South 89P 43' 00" West, along said North line,
660.92 feet to a point In the West line of said Southeast Quarter;
thence South 10 49' 00" East, along said West line, 1292.40 feet
to a point In the existing City Limits line of the City of Lodi,
said point lying 30-00 feet North of the South line of said
Section 34; thence West, parallel to said South line and along
said City Limits Line, 765-00 feet; thence southerly, parallel to
the East line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3 and along said
City Limits line, 660.00 feet; thence easterly, parallel to the
North line of said Quarter and along said City Limits line, 725-00
feet to a point In the West line of LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD; thence
southerly, along said West line and along the existing'City Limits
line 919.75 feet; thence continuing along said City Limits line
the following 6 courses: (1) West, 483-83 feet; (2) South 1 221 0011
West 128.00 feet; (3) North 860 58, ow, west, 121.00 feet; (4)
North 0 02' 00" East, 230-00 feet; (5) North 88 461 00" West,
158-00 feet; (6) North 880 31' 00" vwst, 643-00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing 151.1 acres, more or less.
b
O
NOTICE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
REQUEST OF BURTON TOWNE REORGANIZATION
Notice is hereby given that the Community Development Director
has filed a Negative Declaration for the TOWNE REORGANIZATION, an
annexation of 151= acres to the City of Lodi, located at the north-
west and southwest corner of Turner and tower Sacramento Road.
Information regarding this item may be obtained In the
office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street,
Lodi, CA. All interested persons are invited to present their views
and comments of the Negative Declaration. Written statements may be
filed with the Community Development Director at any time prior to
June 10, 1981.
By Order of the City of Lodi
JAMES B. SCHROEDER, Director
Community Deve 1 opmen t Department
DATED; May 28, 1981
NEMME iIMARMON
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Departme as
determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available
in' the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Hall
Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance
of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than
the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal".
Date May 28, 19$1 Project Title: TOWNE REORGANIZATION 12
Na -81-5
Lead Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: DAVID MORIMOTO
NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
CITY OF LOUT ; t
Address: City: County:
221 W. Pine Street Lodi San Joaquin
Area Code: Phone;
209 334-5634 Ext '257
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION
The apnlicant.-Burton Towne, is requesting annexation of i51t acres to the
City of Lodi and 4etachment of those properties currently within the W.J.D.
and WRFPD. The property is in agricultural uses except for several residences.
The applicant has no proposal for development. The area is designated residential
low-dens'.ty (1-10 units per acre). in the Lodi General Plan.
Vr--o]ect LRation city PMfect location County
LODI SAP! JOPQUIN COUNTY
as to o ppea ress ere re m nary nv ronmen
6-g-81 Assessment is Availy ale:
LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240
Phone: (209) 334-5634
Environmental Assessment
INITIAL "TUDY
1. PROJECT TITLE TONNE REORGANIZATION 12
2• LOCATION Northwest b Southwest corner of Turner b Lower Sacramento Rd (See Map)
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicants Burton Towne, is requesting annexation "of
lytt acres to the City of Lodi. The area is designated low density
residential in the Lodi General Plan. This designation would allow 1-10
units per acre, with a probable average of 5-6 units per acre. No develop=
ment proposal has been made by the applicant.
1�. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B)- Proposed (A) Low Density
Residential (1-10 units per acre); (B) Same.
5• Site description and surrounding land use The subject property.•:' is currently
p- agrituitural,,use. 'The nr-ea,:to the north and east are a mixture of
residential 6 commercial uses. To the west 6 south are agricultural.
6. Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) I -PA b GA -1 (S.J.CO.); (B) U -H,
Unclassified -Holding. -•
Will the Pro ect Have a Significant Effect
hrThrough Any of the following Impacts- :'Yes No Ma be
7, a. Substantial alteration of natural topography,_soil
or -subsoil features................................... X
b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.. X
e. Substantially deplete surface or groundwater _
X
resources ............................................. „_....
A. Substantially interfere with groundwater flan X :
or' recharge ........... ..........................
e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion
iltation..
or s .......................................... X
f. Substantial interference with the habitat of any
species of fish, wildlife or plant ............ .......
g. Violate ambient air quality standards or create
substantial air emissions or objectionable odors...... X
h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare
level for adjoining areas ............................. _ •,.�-
A. Substantlal'reduction of-xisting cropland ............
j.. •.Expose individuals or property to geologic, public `
X ._ _3;'
health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards......
• � �'' .. + .,, h: is ,.. �. s��_
S
Yes °ho Maybe
k. Have a substant--ial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
effect...... X
1. Result in the disruption or alteration of an
archeological, historical or paleontological site.... X
m. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in X
any natural resources .............................:_.
n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
fuel or. energy... X
' o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm X -
drain, electrical lines or public roads ..............
p. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
public services such as schools or fire or police X
protection ...........................................
q. Substantially change. transportation patterns related ;
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking X'.
availability or traffic safety ........................ -
r.Induce substantial growth,"concentratlon or displace
went 'of -population . ... .............'...........,'::...'.;. X
s. Result to -an alteration or conflict with existing o'r
.
X
planned land uses ..............................-
t. Conflict with ado plans, ' 't� `
ted � ;.'�s,'r" •;.,� S,;r
• P P ,goats or poli-cies of •X -
the City of Lodi _•.....✓.....................................
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: The annexation will have no
. effect on the environment. _,
IL
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts identified by Initial -Study:
• Y..• • ..ter. . t . 1' ��a"j,`.1•/• =..` "'�:' x .. .... . i�'�:: �• -
'a: ..,, •�: -h: • .E'Yr: •tet L.:1 •'>•.... ,.:. y:J\..r: _ ` -
U Ar
+S- .. >.. ±• _ .�, t y..�•'• `:-',. I. T•.�Y. SC T' (s •ti Y�y �✓•'V-,Yi-�':�•�•� 1';2?i1'"Z�• i'
RECOMMENDATION �,t.,'z.. - =t>:. ;.� ,� _ ;'�f .�►-� , sr�'''4;
. XDeclaration
5 .`cit, ati.
Negative Dec 1 a �-
�. ration EIR ..Conditional Negative
y } " �._ .. .�,:.:;:; tit- -Declaration1-4
A. r:►.%` ;�j;"
.:ARES B. SCIMEDER
v '7 ►_ '� EnvI ronmentaI Review Off icer '
S,i!�t' °Z' i t��' '`c.d: 3 "•�:-r �:, tRv •i'`.t ;.y ..t'.� •t •. s.- .. •sputa
,
; .. ... ., .. :. •S.JY t�'_:r, � .. _:jam
.e, .... -=—.�sov+xena.waar.u.� -s.<.•..--. _.. ---..._.. .. ... __... ._ __-'. r - -------------_-1 .s;.`•�tlk�'FaJ' _.
TOWNE REORGANIZATION NO. 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Towne Reorganization involves the annexation of 151± acres to the City
of Lodi and the withdrawal of this property from the Woodbridge Rural Fire
Protection District and the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal (W.I.D.).
The property is located on both the north and south side of Turner Road and!
1s bounded by Lower Sacramento Road/Lilac Street on the East and the W.I.D.
Canal on the west. The area lies between the City of Lodi to the. south and!
east and the unincorporated community of Woodbridge to the north. West of
the subject area is a wholesale commercial nursery and beyond that are
agricultural parcels.
The project parcels are primarily agricultural except for several small
residential parcels along Turner Road and along Lilac Street.
The area under study Is designated residential low density In the City of
Lodi General Plan. This designation permits 1-10 residential units per
acre. There are roughly 140 acres of undeveloped land. At an average of
6 units per acre, there is a potential for approximately 840 residential
units in Cie project property.
The area is within the urban growth line and the General Plan area of the
City of Lodi and Is designated for residential development. The City of
Lodi has developed its utility systems to service this area with water,
sanitary sewer, storm drainage, electricity, etc. Future development would
require extensions of existing lines and the construction of streets and
other required improvements.
There is currently a proposal to develop the parcel immediately to the south
of the area proposed for annexation. Development of this property would
extend utilities and streets up to the south boundary of the subject
property.
The applicant does not have any specific proposal, to develop his property
at the present time. The property will be given a zoning designation of
U -H, unclassified holding. This zone does not permit development of urban
uses. A rezoning to a specific develorwent zone would be required to
develop the property.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The annexation will have no significant impact on the environment. Future
development of the property, however, could affect the environment.
If developed with urban uses, the property would be affected by transforming
a primarily agricultural property to an urban use. The existing crops would
' Z•
be 'replaced with streets, houses, and other residential uses. The existing
agricultural land would be taken out of production with little likelihood
of ever returning to agricultural use.
This impact, though regrettable, is not considered significant because of
the location of the subject property. The property is within the general
pian area of the City of Lodi and designated for residential development.
The area is bordered by existing City limits on two sides. Annexation of
this parcel provides for the orderly growth of the City and allows for
future housing for its citizens. The property is shown as the next area
for development in the City's Phased Residential Growth Pian. When developed,
the City will provide the full range of City services.
Development of the property for residential uses could impact the Lodi
Unified School District by generating additional students. The L.U.S.D• is
currently experiencing problems of overcrowding. This can be mitigated by
requiring the 'applicant to enter into an agreement with the L.U.S.D. to
provide financial assistance to the District. The developer would pay an
agreed-upon aw unt to help pay for additional classroom space to house the
additional students.'
FINDING
Based on the initial study, the City of Lodi finds that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment except for the Impaction on the
L.U.S.D. This impact can be mitigated by the payment of appropriate fees
to the L.U.S.D, by the developer.
'3rr
Li
TOWNE REORGANIZATION NO.2
�.r •may .
I've -
Q 1M-.
t \
151.10 AC
N
1• 1
• o j •
i
CITY LIMITS LINE
q - 11���..11tyI1 ri
t
i
o T .
1
j
i
i
. N•
I r � . • �'• 1 a� •: �. t � �1 tr 1 t }.
II
', s
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
LEAD AGENCY: City of Lodi Community Development Department
221 Nest Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
TO: ® -Secretary for Resources FROM: CITY OF LODI
1415 Ninth Street, Room 1311
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk
County of San Joaquin
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
PROJECT•tITLE• TOWNE REORGANIZATION NO. 2 (ND -81-5)
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: --
The City of Lodi has made the following determinations regarding this project:
1. The project has been 0 approved by the Lead Agency.
disapproved
2: The project Q will have a significant effect on the environment.
[]X will not
3An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for this project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations is attached.
5. ® A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and a copy
is attached.
r
June 19, 1981
DATE: