Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 16, 1982 (62)TURNER ROAD City Attorney Stein introduced Agenda item "k" - EXTENSION "Turner Road Extension" in regards to the Jerome/Snell Properties appraisals advising that at the March 10. 1982 City Council meeting, Staff was informed by the Council that it was Council's intention to acquire the required rights-of-way from the Jeromes and Snells for the Turner Road widening and Council directed Staff to proceed with the appraisal work. Subsequent thereto. Craig Hubbard, MAI Appraiser contacted the Jeromes and Snells with the idea of appraising their property. On or about April 20. 1982. Mr. Stein received word from the City Engineering Department that Mrs. Snell was refusing to allow the appraiser to come onto her property in that she had no interest in selling the prope rty and that there was no point in the appraiser being there. In order to have an appraiser go onto property when the property owner has refused entry. it than become s necessary for the City to go to Superior Court to petition the Court for an Order permitting entry by an appra Ise r on the property. On motion of Mayor Fred Reid, Murphy second, Council authorized the City Attorney to obtain a, San Joaquin County Superior Court Order rbrmitting Entry on Property (CCP Section 1245.030 (a)) iu order that the City may have an appraisal made of the Snell property (1011 North Cluff Avenue. Lodi) to determine the value thereof as required for the,,. Turner Road widening project. OUIetCIIr COMMUNICATInN Tp, TPM VTV COUNCK DATE NO. FROM: TNR CJT1l MMA01" OfflCt June 11, 1982 SUBJECT. Jerome/Snell Properties Appraisals At the March 10, 1982 City Council meeting, Staff was informed by the Council that it was Council's intention to acquire the required rights-of-way from the Jeromes and Snells for the Turner Road widening and Council directed Staff to proceed with the appraisal work. Subsequent thereto, Craig Hubbard, MAI Appraiser contacted- the Jeromes and Spells with theidea of appraising their proFerty. On or about April 20, 19820 I received word from the City Engineering Department that Mrs. Snell was refusing to allow the appraiser to come onto her property in that she had no interest in selling the property and that there was no point in the appraiser being there. In order to have an appraiser.go onto proper ty,when . the property owner has refused entry, it_then be comes necessary for the City to go to Superior Court to petition.the Court for an Order permititing`entry by an appraiser on the property. With this in mind, I feel that it is my -responsibility to return this matter to Council. for direc.tion,regard-1 ing same., CITY ATTORNEY RMS s vc