Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 5, 1985 (73)' . CITY COUNCIL MEE'T'ING +, JUNE.5t 1985 pEVIEW OF STOCKTON SST DETAILS, WEST SIDE FRONTING Vey INDUSTRIES AND RESIDENTIAL Stand - APEAS Staff presented a review of the South details, responded to sed by the Council. sidewalk, and drainage Posed paving, the subject as were regarding - --.777777777777 questions _ J. --M, 4=.- 'r` S e rt s 3 O OF LODII Q -PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: City Council FROM: City Manager DATE: May 30, 1985 SUBJECT: South Stockton Street Paving, Sidewalk and Orsoinage Details The Public Works staff will present to the City Council for their review and comment, the proposed paving, sidewalk, drainage, and §f -raping details for South.Stockton Street between Kettleman Lane and 1,000 feet north of Kettlernan Lane. Enclosed for your information is a copy of our March 15 Council Communication on Sidewalk Deficiencies. Included in this memo i5 the recrammendation on sidewalk installation related to South Stockton Stre@t, Qa k L. Ronsko Pub is Works Director At chments JLR/eeh cc: Ken Wilson 1241 S. Stockton St. APPROVED.: ,.._..� FILE HO. _ THOMAS A. PETERSON, City Manager t CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: City Council FROM: City Manager DATE: March 15, 1985 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION SUBJECT: Sidewalk Deficiencies on 1985 Street improvement Projects RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council discuss sidewalk deficiencies and give direction to staff. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: in 1985 we will be reconstructing and/or widening the following streets: 1. Ham Lane - Lodi to Elm (Exhibit A) 2. Hutchins Street - Rimby to Vine (Exhibit B) 3. Lockeford Street - Mills to Cross (Exhibit C) 4. California Street - Lockeford to Turner Road (Exhibit D) 5. Stockton Street - Kettleman Lane to Vine (Exhibit E) The above exhibits show these street projects with the deficient curb and gutter and sidewalk noted. As part of these above projects, the City will be.instali- ing the deficient curb and gutter with one exception. Some of the deficient sidewalk will be installed by the City because it is our responsibility. In some cases, the City has agreements with property owners for the installation of the sidewalk, however, there are some sidewalk deficiencies on developed parcels where we need direction from the City Council. Sidewalk installation is a property owner's responsibility. The City can require the property owners to provide the sidewalk that is missing where we have the right-of-way and more than 50% of the block has improvements. Ham Lane The Ham Lane project includes street reconstruction with widening on the west side. There are presently only four parcels which have no sidewalk. The City has a verbal agreement with the property owners of the 4-plex, located on the S.W. corner at Walnut Street, for the installation of sidewalk on Ham Lane. It is recommended that the City call for this sidewalk in- stallation at this time. A portion of the Zion Reformed Church (fronting the parking lots on the north and south side of the church) has no sidewalk. The City is ac- quiring right-of-way from the Zion Reformed Church and it is recomv)ended that the City ask that they put'in their sidewalk at this time. The cost of the sidewalk installation is approximately $3,000 which is about 10% of what they will receive from the right-of-way acquisition. The west side of Ham Lane is highly used by pedestrian traffic due to the proximity of Lodi High School. APPROVED: HENRY A. Gt:;!cc City Ma^Ener FILE NO. City Council March 15, 1985 Page 2 Hutchins Street This project includes street reconstruction between the existing curbs. On the east side of the street between Ribier and Cardinal, there is one undeveloped parcel where there is no curb and gutter or sidewalk. In order to get a good finished product, the City is proposing to remove the two large cottonwood trees which are in the right-of-way at the edge of pavement and install curb and gutter through the frontage of this parcel. It is not proposed that the sidewalk be installed until the parcel is developed. Also on the east side between York and Windsor, there is a developed residen- tial parcel with no sidewalk. The City has the right-of-way in this area and it is recommended that the City require this property owner to install sidewalk at this time. Lockeford Street This project includes the reconstruction of the existing pavement between the existing curbs. There are two parcels having no sidewalk as noted on Exhibit C. It is recommended that the City require this sidewalk be in- stalled at this time. California Street This project includes street reconstruction between the existing curbs. The City will be installing curb, gutter, and sidewalk through the railroad crossing similar to the approach improvements that were recently made on Ham Lane at the Southern Pacific. crossing. The railroad crossing protection will be installed by Southern Pacific in conjunction with this project. The only other area that is deficient in sidewalk is the east side of the block between Lockeford and Hutchins (Holly Drive) fronting the small shopping center and coffee shop. The City has the right-of-way in this area and it is recommended ti:e City require the property owner to install sidewalk on the east side of California Street between Lockeford and Hutchins (Holly Drive). As noted on Exhibit D, the block surrounded by Hutchins, Lockeford, and California, also has deficient sidewalk on the Hutchins Street frontage. The City Council may want 'to require all of this sidewalk being installed at this time. Stockton Street This project includes the reconstruction of the existing pavement, widening in some areas, and the City providing curb and gutter in the areas where the parcels are developed in order to get a better overall finished paving project. This project is currently under construction and the work is being done by the Claude Woods Co. City Council March 15, 1985 Page 3 Fronting Valley industry, the City is not providing curb and gutter because the parcel is a large undeveloped property where future development will require the installation of a curb, gutter and sidewalk. The parcel on the northeast corner of Kettleman Lane and Stockton Street has no curb and gutter or sidewalk, however, at the time of its development, the City took the dollars to cover this work since the Stockton Street alignment had not yet been determined. Therefore, the City is putting in curb, gutter and sidewalk on this parcel under this project. On the east side, there are six remaining parcels which do not have side- walk. It is recommended that t"he City require these parcels to install sidewalk along their frontage. It is our understanding from C. C. bloods Company that they already have a contract with two of these property owners to install their sidewalks. On the west side, in addition to the large undeveloped Valley Industry's parcel, there are five smaller parcels which do not have sidewalk. This sidewalk could be required now or delayed until the Valley Industry parcel develops and then require sidewalk fronting all of the west side of Stockton Street from Kettleman Lane to Vine Street. \ 7 acli L. Ronsko Pubs Works Director hments JLR/eeh bcc: G. Baltzer R. Prima Exhibit A SEE 24' - �®��_ Q���•`m +m uo ac ®=m �.m=• ]i •f• �! � � . 1y �i a. `s ;r`, .r Q, a. ST- - ELM m m S T. P�F r LC sztn t 1.= I s• H e � _ a T. ...... y YNEZ CR_ L DR. W I j j II: D I V •� !± CL UT ST. WALNUT ST. q No _ ON ST. IN SEE 44 UJ W 4 1 Q_ ...� :tel -- � ;i: 0 e a ji I -TAMARACK gend i\lo C9, G No S,,N k, MTS �:- KE TL - SEE 66 I Exhibit B 1, SEE 46 �______� u I 1 �__ -7-7-77- A A V1 All SY ORE C'Ty OF LODi wol-s DE-AT-E%T S-_ i Exhibit C C TUPNER!- ,� y tt _71 - ) �.• �'� tr 0 � !� 3 +® m ml� m .o J ��_`.-s •anl� anlm ®•mlm,m �mlm:ao, � E=. w • LAKE HOME DR. ~• �y0<<Y���`�%•_ .`1j• �� {L d � me�®R® yo Vim` �- .mom s a.�{m�m`mim'mim�® � � I - _ i E Q - _ g �-.,, / » ,,4 'a;sVl � ®�'Z ��, .✓,_'i" �,'.c�'o--n�®la im ice+ ®, � M ,- -.: ST. ra AVE., p� _@pp ftb _ �= �.. .:r .'�. •ojs m� .awl am •4 J4i �, � � C. ST • LAKE — _o m: m�mj I ��. a N I �---�— .a I g g.�.... .z. P g • AVERS AVE. g — �- x Qa �� P *�ROSERT'® . Lq-g e n ci . W COLETTE _St 8 _ o GRAFFIGNA AVE. -�,yy, r'*+w�-,.�j �•��-''�.r••• M I O � � .ml+ai J I ® '; � .CTS L✓+;• t _ i ao ;m;+o w.o.�� g ,� I m Y' i1p i ��n�•�� ci®i.m'a�. .K.� �s ' j 3 W i g i Y Z :.. - t ST. MARIPOSA P . a• WY: J xhilei t D 7 SEE i5 tNEq Ra ti AVE. --- — -- -------- PAL-M 0 AVE. EUREKA JiE AVE. I& az Ar— A FAIR COURT FALLS AVE.: J ID,2E 04 AVE. FORREST 91. 'Ab Zk R%b INS AVE. to uj _qt CT. .4 'Ib OL!VE T.. Legend 7 .11 17al. N o 6 vv K FORD ST� Z_ -MARi Y. CARLO wy. s w !L_ - I > cz, Ir SEE 35 CITY OF LODI r "Lc -OR-5 lc..Tww — — 25 L7 - - -- - ------------------- >1 fl JfaTs r-A VSS'.CN I CONCUR:, R 4 ul -cs:. `ST ai Lqgend ...... . . . EsFSC 1 XIX KETT:.EMAN SEE 67 r -Cr-Y OF LOD!