HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 4, 1986CITY COUNCIL HMING 004P
JUNE 4, 1986
B1A1U,;-LY PARK POOL
RENOVATION AND
CONSTRUCTION PRQTEC"I'
BID RE.TBCrED
Council was apprised that only one qualified bid had been
received on May 28, 1986 for the Blakely Park Pool
uC-12(b)
Renovation and Construction Project as follows:
Martin Company, $247,500
Upon reviewing the bid, it was concluded that the project
would, if awarded, experience a cost increase of $70,000
t
over the lowest bid submitted in February 1986. Since
project construction will not be scheduled to commence
until after Labor Day, and that the number of bids
submitted is unsatisfactory for a project of this size, it
is the opinion of City staff that the current qualified
bids should be rejected.
Following discussion with questions being directed to
Staff, Council, on motion of Council Member Pinkerton,
hinchman second, rejected the sole qualified bid received
for the Blakely Park Pool Renovation and Construction
Project and authorized the readvertising for bids thereon.
CITY OF LORI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Project Data
TO: City Council Original y u gete . 1985
Budgeted Fund: HUD Block Grant
FROM: City Manager Amount Budgeted: $130,000 FY85-86
($20,000 FY86-87)
DATE: May 29, 1986 Total Project Estimate: $210,000
Bid Opening Date: May 28, 1986
SUBJECT: Blakely park Pool Renovation
and Construction Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council discuss the bid received, and take
appropriate action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This project covers construction of a new swimming pool,.
rp abs itation of t e existing pool, and remodel of the existing dressing rooms for
nindicap access.
1. Bids.were first opened February 26, 1986, as follows:
BIDDER LOCATION BID AMOUNT
qA ua-Fab, Inc. Phoenix, AZ $174,300
Thorcon,.Inc. Fair Oaks $200,800
Diede Construction Woodbridge $239,834
Max D. Schenk Fairfax $258,580
Due to license inadequacies of the bidder, Aqua -Fab, Inc., all bids were rejected
by Council on March 5, 1986, and authorization was given to readvertise the project
for new bids.
2. New bids were opened May 28, 1986, as follows:
BIDDER LOCATION BID AMOUNT
Martin Company C a—i yton, CA $247,900
(Note: Neth Construction of Stockton, submitted an incomplete bid - the base bid
was not indicated - and was disqualified. We were informed verbally that the bid
amount was $252,352).
Upon reviewing the bids received, it was concludeJ that the project would, if
awarded, experience a cost increase of $70,000 over the lowest bid submitted in
February. Since project construction will not be scheduled to commence until after
Labor Day, and that the number of bids submitted is unsatisfactory for a project of
this size, it is the opinion of City staff that current bids should be rejected.
Bidding shoutA be readvertised with an opening date of July 30, 1986, and award on
Auqust ,6, 1 i7
JACK L. KOflSKO
Publjt Works Director
cc: Assistant Finance Director
JLR/cag
APPROVED: FILE NO.
f
THOMAS A. PETERSON, City Manager _ i
CITY COUNCIL
FRE r, M REID, Mayor
EVLYN M. OLSON
Mayor Pro Tempore
DAVID M HINCHMAN
JAMES W. PINKERTON. Jr
JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
THOMAS A. PETERSON i
City hianagar
CITY OF L O D I
j,
i
jI`C ('i1tIICEM:REIMCHE
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET ' Cir' C:.'rk
CALL BOX 3006 1014 STEIN
LODI. CALIFORNIA 952 41-1 91 0 � (`� City Attorney
(209) 334-5634
ALICE M. FI_lr�'CHE
CITY C! E:RK
June 6, 1936 CITY Cr LRS
Martin Company
937 Douglas Ct.
Clayton, CA 94517
SUBJECT: Blakely Park Swimming Pool
The Council at its meeting of June 4, 1986, rejected your bid and
authorized the readvertising of this project later this month. We will
send you new plans and specifications for the project.
We wish to thank you for submitting a bid and will welcome your proposal
when we readvertise. Enclosed is your bidder's bond.
Sincerely
\C3( G.E. Robison
Assistant City Engineer
Enclosure
cc: City Clerk
GER/cag
%