HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 21, 1986 (89)C it Y C DUNCR; Piad It a
MAY 21, 1986 Y+
GRAFT FLDDS At its regular meeting of May 7, 1986, the City Council
adopted a resolution determining the public need for
RFS. 86-83 sidewalk installations on the east side of Stockton Street
between Vine Street and Tokay Street. The matter has been
OC -6 set for public hearing for the regular City Council meeting
OC -45(a) of June 4, 1986. In addition, the Council directed the
C-55 Staff to develop alternatives for providing financial
assistance for sidewalk installations for areas which meet
the criteria for the expenditures. of Community Developrnx:t
Block Grant funds.
Various alternatives were presented for Council's perusal
and a lengthy discussion followed. On motion of Council
Member Snider, Reid second, Council adopted Resolution No.
86-83 establishing alternatives for providing financial
assistance for sidewalk installations in areas which meet
the criteria for the expenditures of Ccammnity Development
Block Grant funds as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-83
RESOLUTION OF THE LODI l _Y COUNCIL
IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION NO. 44, THE WATER CONSERVATION
AND WA'Ir�. t QUALITY BOND LAW OF 1986
WHEREAS, an adequate supply of good caality water is
essential to the health and safety of California's ever
growing popalation; and,
WHEREAS, adequate supplies of good quality water are vital
to the maintenance and development of the State's economy;
particularly California's two largest industries, tourism
and agriculture, generating $45 billion in annual revenue
for California; and
WHMW, locally sponsored water conservation, groundwater
recharge, and drainage projects are among the most cost
effective ways to help insure adequate supplies of good
quality water; and,
;uAS, in 1984, the California electorate approved a
Clean Water Bond Act which provided $10 million for low
interest loans to water agencies for water con.,-arvation
projects; and,
WEUUMS, application for those loans exceeded available
funds by nine times, demonstrating the need for such a
pram; and,
WHEFZFAS, the Water Conservation and Water Quality Control
Bond Act, Proposition 44, on the June ballot would provide
$i50 million for loans to water agencies for water
conservation, groundwater recharge, and drainage projects;
and,
WHEREAS, the Water Conservation and Water Quality Bond Act,
Proposition 44, would be an extremely cost effective
measure for Californians, costing an average of 37 cents
per household annually; and,
WHEREAS, funds available from Proposition 44 are expected
to be a significant help in developing locally sponsored
water conservation, drainage, and groumwater recharge
Projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council
of the City of Lodi supports Proposition 44 and urges its
passage by the California electorate on June 3, 1986.
Dated:
ray 21, 1986
I hereby
certify that Resolution No. 86-83
was passed and
adopted
by the City Council of the City
of Lodi in a
Regular
Meeting held May 21, 1986 by tiv-- following vote:
Ayes:
Council Members - Hinchman, olson,
Pinkerton,
Snider, and Reid
(Mayor)
Noes:
Council Members - None
Absent:
Council Memhers - None
ALICE M. REIMCBE
City Clerk
Y