Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 21, 1986 (99). CITY _CQUNCIL MEETING MAY 21, 1986 - PROPOSITION 44 N(O WATER QUALITY BOM LAW OF 1986 City Clerk Reimche presented a letter which had been received from Jim Costa, Chairman of the California OC-19 Legislature Assembly Coxtmittee on Water, Parks and Wildlife OC-28 urging endorsement of Proposition 44, the Water Conservation and Water Quality Bond Law of 1986 which appears on California's June 3, 1986, direct primary ballot. A lengthy discussion followed reoardinq the matter with questions being directed to Staff. Mayor Reid moved to adopt Resolution No. 86-83 endorsing passing of Proposition 44. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Olson but failed to pass by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Olson and Reid Roes: Council Ak3a)ers - Pinkerton and Snider Absent: Council Nknibers - Hinchman May S, 1986 e California i[egifilature Assemble (90mmitiee an Water, Parks ani Wilblife JIM COSTA CHAIRMAN 61AY 7 1986 Dear City Manager: 3 j I am writing to seek your Council's endorsement of Proposition 44, the Water Conservation and Water Qualtity Bond Law of 1986, which appears on California's June 3, 1986, direct primary ballot. Prop-o-sition 44 will provide $150 million in much-needed loans to local agencies for voluntary, cost-effective water conservation programs, groundwater recharge facilities, and ti agricultural drainage water treatment and containment works. Two years ago, voters approved Proposition 25, the Clean Water Bond Law, which provided funding for wastewater treatment, water reclamation, and water conservation programs. The Department of Water Resources received 55 applications from local agencies throughout the state requesting nearly $90 million in assistance for water conservation alone. Proposition 44 will enable these local agencies to conserve wa-t-er now -being lost due to leaking pipes and unlined ditches and canals. Proposition 44 will also provide loans for a new state program -- groundwater recharge -- which has been practiced in California for almost 90 years. Groundwater recharge is a proven method of placing surplus surface water from wet years into available storage underground so that it can be used in dry years. This underground space is available in the Central Valley and in valley areas in coastal and Southern California. As storing surface water behind dams has become more expensive, storing water underground where it does not evaporate becomes more practical, efficient, and economical. STATE CAPITOL ? SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95814 1 (916) 445.6164 The third program contained in Proposition 44 addresses our state's agricultural drainage problem. Californians have made a strong commitment to protecting water quality. Much of our efforts have focused on treating municipal sewage water before it is discharged to our rivers, bays, and ocean waters. Today, rural areas throughout the state need to implement better treatment and containment methods because of the salt and trace element buildup in farm drainage water. This drainage problem will progressively worsen unless we take positive steps to correct it. Proposition 44 will provide funding for the treatment and containment of drainage water in an environmentally -safe manner. An abundant supply of clean water will preserve the beauty of California's environment, maintain fish and wildlife, and support recreation. A continued supply of clean water will also ensure the vitality of industry and agriculture. Most importantly, however, a clean and abundant supply of water is necessary to preserve and protect public health. I hope your Council can join me and Californians for Clean Water in endorsing Proposition 44. A growing list of supporters includes the California Chamber of Commerce, Association of California Water Agencies, California Farm Bureau Federation, Cal -Tax, California State Grange, California Labor Federation (AFL-CIO), and the American Associatlon of University Women. There is no known opposition to Proposition 44. I have attached a draft resolution that you may wish to use in endorsing Proposition 44. I would appreciate it if your clerk could forward a copy of your resolution to local media and a -copy to Californians for Clean Water, c/o Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell, 770 L Street, Suite 1150, Sacramento, California 95814. On behalf of Californians for Clean Water, thank you for any assistance you can provide toward the passage of Proposition 44. Your prompt response is important so that Californians for Clean Water can add your Council to its list of sup orters. SlIce ly, l J CO A C irman