HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 6, 1981 (64)ACTION ON
SCHOOL PARCEL
(FILERS
REORGANIZATION)
DEFERRED FOR
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Council discussion then followed regarding the
school parcel with questions being directed to
Staff. A motion to include the school parcel
in the annexation with the Eiler's parcels,
with certain conditions, was made and rescinded.
Following additional discussion, Council,
on motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Murphy
second, deferred action on the Woodbridge
Senior Elementary School Grounds parcel to
allow the City Attorney time to research what
responsibility the Lodi Unified School District
would have in bringing this property up to
City standards, with the direction that this
matter, including the requested information,
be brought back to the Council at the May 20,
1981 Council Meeting.
FILERS Agenda item "s" - "Eilers Reorganization,
REORGANIZATION including annexation of territory to the City
AND DETACHMENT of Lodi and detachment from the Woodbridge
Rural Fire Protection District" was introduced
RES. NO. 81-51 by Community Development Director Schroeder.
Diagrams of the subject area were presented
for Council's perusal and questions concerning
the matter were directed to Staff.
Following additional discussion, Council,
on motion of Councilman Katnich, Pinkerton:
second, adopted Resolution No. 81-51
Resolution of the Lodi City Council for theSrt'
Application to the San Joaquin County Local
Agency Formation Commission in the matter of
the proposed "Eilers Addition" reorganization,
including detachment from the Woodbridge Rural
Fire Protection District (excluding the
Woodbridge Senior Elementary School Grounds).
The motion carried by unanimous vote.
City Clerk Reimche presented a letter which
had been received from Richard L. Ehrhardt,
Facility Planner, Lodi Unified School District,
advising that the Lodi Unified School District
Board of Trustees did approve being included
in the annexation of the Eilers property as
long as the School District has "their" signed
agreement to pay the development fees directly
to the district.
-
Council discussion followed with questions
being directed to Staff.
On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Murphy
second, Council determined to consider separately
Y
the Eilers parcels and the school parcel in this
M..
subject matter.
,
Speaking on behalf of the proponent of this
annexation, Mr. Henry G. Eilers, was his
attorney, Mr. C. M. Sullivan, Attorney at Law,
1111 W. Tokay Street, Lodi. Mr. Sullivan
stated that the subject property is being
proposed for annexation as it is "ripe for
annexation, all utilities are available and it
is located in Phase h of the City's Residential
Phasing Plan. Mr. Sullivan further stated that
the most likely use of the property would be for
Planned Development.
Mr. Henry Eilers, Linden, California, addressed
the Council stating that the property had been
in his family for 80 years. Mr. Eilers stated
that he is an advocate of retaining prime
agricultural land; however, the subject
property is presently surrounded by development
which makes it extremely difficult to farm.
Council discussion followed with questions being
directed to Staff, Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Eilers.','<'
\
Following an inquiry by Council, Mr. Eilers
stated that he realized that the future street
alignment will cross his property.
On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Katnich
second, Council certified the Necyative`'.`.
Declaration - Eilers Reorganization and
Detachment (Eilers parcels only).
?'
Following additional discussion, Council,
on motion of Councilman Katnich, Pinkerton:
second, adopted Resolution No. 81-51
Resolution of the Lodi City Council for theSrt'
Application to the San Joaquin County Local
Agency Formation Commission in the matter of
the proposed "Eilers Addition" reorganization,
including detachment from the Woodbridge Rural
Fire Protection District (excluding the
Woodbridge Senior Elementary School Grounds).
The motion carried by unanimous vote.
n,
0 JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
for &grzonization or Change of Organization Affecting Local Agencien
Filed-*ith local Agency Formation Commission of San Joaquin County
c/b Dewey E. Mansfield, Executive Officer
County Courthouse, Room 153
222 East Taber Avenue ?hone: (209) 944-2196 Date: 3-23-81
Stockton, California 95202
The undersigned, on behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby give notice
of intention to:
❑ incorporate a city
E3 form a district
g annex territory to an agency
C3 consolidate existing agencies
❑ disincorr)orate a city
E] dissolve a district
El detach territory from an agency
To further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following:
1. Three (3) copies of this completed "Justification of Proposal"
2.3 Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected terrf tory -
consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Office
3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies
(maps to be no smaller than 8�" x 11" which is the most preferable size and
shall be no larger than 18" x 26".
4. Filing & processing fees in accordance with LAFCO fee schedule
The following persons (not'to exceed three) are t8 be mailed copies of the Executive
Offi:*r's Report and notice of commission hearings regarding the subject Proposal -
ALICE M. REIMCHE, City Clerk, 221 W. Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
(name) -- (address)
HENRY G. EILERS, 16657 E. Milton Road, Linden, CA 95236 _
name address
JAMES B. SCHROEDER, Community Development Director, 221 W. Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
name address
COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS signed
If a question is not applicable to your proposal, ou may so state.
1. Local agency organization changes hereby proposed --designate affected agencies and
annexations by name:
EILERS REORGANIZATION Annexation of territory t„ ``..e City of Lodi. Detachment
from the Woodbridge Fire District. Annexation includes the Woodbridge Senior
Elementary School grounds.
2. Statutory provisions governing proceedings:
Title 60 Division I (commencing with Sec. 56000) of the California Government
Code District Reorganization Act of 1965.
Page 1
3. Do proposed boundaries create an island or corridor of unincorporated territory?
NO
4. Do proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ownership?
NO
5. land area affected: square miles acres 46'34
6. Population in subject area: 0 7. Number of registered voters: 0
8. Registered voter density (per acre): 0 9. Number of dwelling units: 0
10. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years: 500
11. Present land use of subject area: 11.5 acres are being used as elementary school;
32 acres are being farmed to supply an on-site fruit and vegetable stand.
12. What is the intended development of this area: The vacant acreage is designated
Residential low density in the Lodi General Plan (1-10 units/acre). No specific
development plan submitted by applicant.
13. Present zoning:
San Joaquin County Zoning GA -1, general agriculture - 1 acre minimum.
14. Describe proposed zoning changes: Will be annexed as U -H, Unclassified Holding.
Probable future zoning will be R-1, R-2 or Planned Development
15. Assessed value of land: $ 35,700
16. Assessed value of improvements: $ 76.5
17. Value of publicly owned land inarea.
0
18. Covernmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available:
When developed the property will require municipal water, sewer; storm drainage
and police and fire protection. School currently has own water sewer plus county
19. What alternative measures would rovide services listed in Item 18 above?
P.
services.
County services and/or connection to special service districts in Woodbridge.
20. What modifications must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to
provide services initiated by this proposal?
Extend water, sewer and storm drain lines when property is developed.
21. What approximate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Item 20 above?
Unknown.
22. How will such costs be met?
Developer of property will pay for utility line extensions.
23. Will provisions of this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency
or affected property?
NO
24. Q Check here if you are submitting further comments and evaluations on additional pages.
Page 2
i`dP
MC===='■ IN
`r- '- iii�■ r�`
HIML®� _ _
n111tititi■/1/���tl■ MEMO
.�.
I i,
CITY COUNCIL
JAMES A. McCARTY, Mayor
ROBERT G. MURPHY, Mayor Pro Tern
RICHARD L. HUGHES
WALTER KATNICH
JAMES W. PINKERTON. Jr.
r�
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 320
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241
(209) 334-5634
May 12, 1981
Mr. Gerald F. Scott
Executive Officer
Local Agency Formation Commission
County Courthouse, Room 153
222 E. Weber Avenue
Stockton, CA 95202
Re: Proposed "Eilers Addition" Reorganization and Detachment
HENRY A CLAVES. Jr.
City Manager
ALICE M REiMiCHE
City Clerk
RONALD M. STEIN
City Attorney
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith please find the following documents pertaining to the
above entitled matter:
a) Three certified copies of Resolution No. 81-51 entitled, "Reso-
lution of the Lodi City Council for the Application to the
San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission and the
matter of the Proposed 'Eilers Addition' Reorganization including
the Detachment of Certain Territory within the Area Proposed for
Annexation to the City of Lodi".
b) Three copies of Justification of Proposal.
c) Fifteen copies of the map.
d) Fifteen copies of the legal description.
e) Check in the amount of $300.00 covering processing fees.
Should you need anything further, please do not hesitate to call.
Ak:dg
11--mv
Very truly yours,
k, tt j X
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
,....,.. .... .. ..,..,.,..�...amens.a,...i-�:;.v�.v+�wi.�:�a"a.:✓ ifS'u�_-bP.+":ofi�,Ra±sy ... � .�-. N.. :.:
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL ;
dor Reorganization or Change of Organization Affecting Local Agencien
Filed with Local Agency Formation Commission of San Joaquin County
clb Dewey E. Mansfield, Executive Officer
County Courthouse, Room 153 5-18-81
222 East Weber Avenue Phone: (209) 944-2196 Date:
Stockton, California 95202
The undersigned, on behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby give notice
of intention to:
.Q incorporate a city
D form a district
annex territory to an agency
[j consolidate existing agencies
C7 disincorporate a city
13 dissolve a district
-® detach territory from an agency
To further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following:
1. Three (3) copies of this completed "Justification of Proposal"
2.1 Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected territory -
consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Office
3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies
(maps to be no -smaller than 8k" x 11" vhich is the most preferable size and
shall be no larger than 18" x 26".
4. Filing b processing fees in accordance with LAFCO fee schedule
The following persons .(not 'to exceed three) are tit be mailed copies of the Executive
Officer's Report and notice of commission hearings regarding the subject, Proposal.
ALICE M. REIMCHE, City Clerk, 221 W. Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
name address
HENRY G. EILERS, 16657 E. Milton Road, Linden, CA 95236
name - (address)
JAMES B. SCHROEDER, Community Development Director, 221 W. Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
(name) (address)
COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS signed
)V
If a question is not applicable to your proposal, you may so state.
1. Local agency organization changes hereby proposed --designate affected agencies and
annexations by name: _
EILERS REORGANIZATION - Annexation of territory to the City of Lodi. Detachment
roto the Woodbridge Fire District.
2. Statutory provisions governing proceedings:
Title 6, Division 1 (commencing with Sec. 56000) of the California Government
Cide District Reorganization Act of 1965. =
Page 1
M
fes,
Do proposed boundaries create an island or corridor of unincorporated territory?
`o NO
4. Do proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ownership?
NO
5. Land area affected: square miles - acres 34.9 _
6. Population in subject area: 0 7. Number of registered voters: 0
8. Registered voter density (per acre): 0 9. Number of dwelling .units: 0
10. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years:
400
ll. Present land use of subject area:
Agriculture & -commercial fruit stand.
-12. What is the intended development of this area:
The property- is designated residential law density (1-10 units/acre)
In the Lodi General Plan. No specific development plan at present time.
130 Present zoning:
San Joaquin County Zoning nA-1, General agriculture - 1 acre ninimum.
14. Describe proposed zoning changes:
Will be annexed as U -H, unclassified holding. Probable future zoning will be
residentlal'sing.le family or Planned Development.
15. Assessed value of land: $ 35.700 ,
16. Assessed value of improvements: $ 765
- 17. Value of publicly owned land in area: $ -0-
18. Governmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available:
When developed the property will require municiple water, sewer, storm
drainage, police and .fire protection.
19. What alternative -measures would provide services listed in Item 18 above?
County.services and/or annex to special;service districts in Woodbridge.
20. What modifications must -be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to
provide services initiated by this proposal?
Extend water, sewer and storm dra=nage lines when property is developed.
21. What approximate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Iters 20 above?
Unknown.
22. How will such costs be met?
Developer will pay for utility line extensions.
23. Will provisions of this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency
or affected property?
No
24. 0 Check here if you are submitting further comments and evaluations on additional pages:
Page 2
EILERS REORGANIZATION
A portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, T(winship 4,
North Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being described
as follows:
Beginning at a point in the West line of said Quarter, said point
lying North Io 49' 00" West, 27.01 feet from the Southwest corner of
said Quarter; thence North l0 49' 00" West, along said West line,
1295.4 feet; thence North 890 43' 00" East, 680.76 feet to a point in
the East line of LILAC STREET; thence South 6 48' 30" West, along
said East line, 287.47 feet; thence North 89 43' 00" East, 622.24
feet; thence North 70 12' 00" East, 285.4 feet; thence North 890 43' 00"
East, 150:00: feet to a point in the West line of LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD,
said point also being the Northwest corner of NORTH GENERAL MILLS
ADLITION as annexed to the City of Lodi, June 5, 1967, by Ordinance
No.. 836; thence South 70 12' 00" West, along the existing City Limits
line, and along said West line of LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD, 1312.05 feet
to a point in the North line of WEST TURNER ROAD ADDITION as annexed
to the City of Lodi, August 14, 1975, by Resolution No. *4100, said
point also being in the North line of TURNER ROAD; thence West, along
the existing City Limits line, and along said North line of TURNER
ROAD, 1204.28 feet to the point of beginning.
5/81
Containing 34.9 acres, more or less.
��... _.
__..
4
wo- wm-mom
limmon
- MEMO
e1
101
RESOLUTION NO. 81-51
N
RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROPOSED "EILERS ADDITION" REORGANIZATION,
INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY
WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO
THE CITY OF LODI
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District
Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division I of Title 6
(commencing with Section 56000) of the California Government
Code, and;
WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organization
is the annexation to the City of Lodi of an area comprising 34.9
acres, more or less, and withdrawal of said34.9 acres from the
Woodbridge Rural County Fire Protection District as described
and depicted on Exhibit "A", and;
WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are
affected, and;
WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the
City of Lodi and detached from the Woodbridge Rural County Fire
Protection District is uninhabited, and;
WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by
this reorganization, and;
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows:
(1) The uninhabited subject area is within the
urban confines of the City and will generate
service needed substantially similar to that
of other incorporated urban areas which
require municipal government services.
(2) Annexation to the City of Lodi of the subject
area will result in improved economics of scale
and governmental operations while improving of
coordination in the delivery of planning
services.
(3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of
San Joaquin will benefit from the proposed
reorganization as a result of savings to the
County by reduction of County required
services in unincorporated but urban oriented
area.
81-51
-1-
_.. ,....... ;,.�•�,r�.�:, ,,. �._,•.�,:,�:�;��.�� _ �-- -•�--tea.
1E
X
(4) the subject area proposed to be annexed
to the City of Lodi is geographically,
socially, economically and politically
part of the same urban area of which the City
of Lodi is also a part.
(5) The subject area is within the Lodi sphere
of influence.
(6) Future inhabitants of a City residential
subdivision in the subject area will gain
immediate response in regard to the police
and fire protection, unlimited City garbage
and trash collection service, street lighting
service, a modern sewer system, other
municipal services, and improvements of
property values.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Lodi that the San Joaquin County Local Agency
Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the proposed
"Eilers Addition" Reorganization, which includes annexation of
34.9acres from the Woodbridge Rural County Fire Protection
District as described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached
h-ereto. This is all subject to the aforementioned terms and
conditions.
Dated: May 6, 1981
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 81-51 was passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi
in a regular meeting held May 6, 1981 by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - Murphy, Hughes, Pinkerton, Katnich
and McCarty
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
81-51
-2-
Lrrrs, Mum N, PEROVICH Eilers Reorganization 34355
SuLLIVAN & NEwTox
ATTORNEYS AT LAV
1111 W. TOKAT STRESP PTI. 20"34-11144
LODI. CALIF. 95240 May 11 OD-"4
__lfl 8 1 1411
11"
OItDE E v LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION $ 300.00
THREE AND NO,[100------------------------------------------------ ---DoLiARs
tears & �j$mhaft Bank LIn . U.�. »I 5 ff x txsv►*rm
W CtMwAL "LNOMUA
LOW. CALIFORNIA
Fort �
r0 34 3 5 5r "I; i 2 L 10844 LI: 00 «00 i0 7 -ton,