The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - May 1, 1985 (46)The above exhibits show these street projects with the deficient curb and gutter and sidewalk noted. As a part of these above projects, the City will be installing the deficient curb and gutter with one exception. Some of the deficient sidewalk will be installed by the City because it is our responsibility. In some cases, the City has agreements with property owners for the installation of the sidewalk, however, there are some sidewalk deficiencies on developed parcels where we need direction from the City Council. Sidewalk installation is a property owner's responsibility. The City can require the property owners to provide the sidewalk that is missing where we have the right-of-way and more than 50% of the block has inprovements. Ham Lane The Ham Lane project includes street reconstruction with widening on the west side. There are presently only four parcels which have no sidewalk. The City has a verbal agreement with the property owners of the 4-plex, Iocated on the S.W. corner at Walnut Street, for the installation of sidewalk on Ham Lane. It is recommended that the City call for this sidewalk installation at this t ini . A portion of the Zion Reformed Church (fronting the parking lots on the north and south side of the church) has no sidewalk. The City is acquiring right-of-way from the Zion Reformed Church and it is recomwnded that the City ask that they put in their sidewalk at this time. The cost of the sidewalk installation is approximately $3,000 which is about 10% of what they will receive from the right-of-way A - E ` c i REVIEW SIDEt1'ALK Agenda Item K-3 - "_Review sidewalk deficiencies on City's DEFICIZCIES CN major street projects" was introduced by Public Works QTY'S P%,IAJCR Director Ronsko who gave the following- report concerning the STREET PlDJECTS subject: In 1985 we will be reconstructing and/or widening the following streets: I. Ham Lane - Lodi to Elm 2. Hutchins Street - Rimbv to Vine 3. Lockeford Street - Mills to Cross 4. California Street - Lockeford to Turner Road 5, Stockton Street - Kettleman Lane to Vine The above exhibits show these street projects with the deficient curb and gutter and sidewalk noted. As a part of these above projects, the City will be installing the deficient curb and gutter with one exception. Some of the deficient sidewalk will be installed by the City because it is our responsibility. In some cases, the City has agreements with property owners for the installation of the sidewalk, however, there are some sidewalk deficiencies on developed parcels where we need direction from the City Council. Sidewalk installation is a property owner's responsibility. The City can require the property owners to provide the sidewalk that is missing where we have the right-of-way and more than 50% of the block has inprovements. Ham Lane The Ham Lane project includes street reconstruction with widening on the west side. There are presently only four parcels which have no sidewalk. The City has a verbal agreement with the property owners of the 4-plex, Iocated on the S.W. corner at Walnut Street, for the installation of sidewalk on Ham Lane. It is recommended that the City call for this sidewalk installation at this t ini . A portion of the Zion Reformed Church (fronting the parking lots on the north and south side of the church) has no sidewalk. The City is acquiring right-of-way from the Zion Reformed Church and it is recomwnded that the City ask that they put in their sidewalk at this time. The cost of the sidewalk installation is approximately $3,000 which is about 10% of what they will receive from the right-of-way A - E On the east side of the street between Ribier and Cardinal, there is one undeveloi.3d parcel where there is no curb and gutter or sidewalk, In order to get a good finished product, the City is proposing to remove the two Iarge cottonwood trees which are in the right-of-way at the edge of pavement and install curb and gutter through the frontage of this parcel. It is not proposed that the sidewalk be installed until the parcel is developed. Also on the east side between York and Windsor, there is a developed residential parcel with no sidewalk. The City h, --Ls the right-of-way in this area and it is reccxmended that the Citta require this property owner to install sidewalk at this t Ime. Lockeford Street This project includes the reconstruction of the existing pavement between the existing curbs. There are two parcels having no sidewalk. It is recoamended that the City require this sidewalk be installed at this time. California Street This project includes street reconstruction between the existing curbs. The City will be installing curb, gutter, and sidewalk 4 ..•'.� to ttze app roacn µA'� semi 1 ar through theYk r'ai troad crossiri lit Lane at the in rovetnents that were recentlyrailroad on protection Southern Pacific crossing. unction with will be installed by Southern Pacific in conjunction this project. The only other area that is deficient in and eHut Hutchins walk is the (Ilolly side of the block between center and coffee shop. Drive) fronting the small shoppingcenter this area and it is The City has the right-of-��ah ro erty owner to: install recotmiended the City require the property Street between sidewalk on the east side of e block surrounded and Hutchins (Holly Drive)- also has deficient by Hutchins, Lockeford, and California, sidewalk on the Hutchins Street frontage- `n City Council being may want to require all of this sidewalk g installed at this time. Stockton Street This project includes the reconstruction e City providing curb pavement, widening in scxne areas, an in and gutter in the areas where the parcelserall finished reproject.e Pe Thi s order to get a beWider construction and the work is being project is currently done by the Claude C. IVoods Co• Industry' the City is not 1>rovi<litig curb and Fronting Valley y u 1,� r�;c undev(! 1 <ipc>cl prohc r ty gutter because the parcel is tiic installilt ion Of ti '11ie rit•ccl stn the nortlw �t where future to z• cl and lO� Ic�va 11� 1 i t eclutne curb, €, tit thc> LitrK� c,f its (1, vi!1c)lJtit(?nt , corner Of I<cttic�V►n Lane allot Steel:ton Scree>,l hay no curs riru gLittel• or sidewttllc, howevc r. W t ltrid not yet hc.i Cr detc�tmiiie(i, _ the City took the clot 1'itt'�+ to c<svE,t• tiii� woit•k since S t oelc t oti Street ti l i Enztlx 771 =-� � h Therefore, the City is putting in curb, gutter and sidewalk on this parcel under this project. On the east side, there are sit remaining parcels which do not have sidewalk. It is recommended that the City require these parcels to install sidewalk along their 'frontage. It is our understanding from C. C. lVoods Company that they already have a contract with two of these property owners to install their sidewalks. On the west side, in addition to the large undeveloped Valley industnj's parcel, there are five smaller parcels which do not have sidewalk. This sidewalk could be required now or delaved until the Valley Industry parcel develops and then require sidewalk fronting all of the west side of Stockton Street from Kettleman Lane to Vine Street. Numerous exhibits and diagrams were presented for Council's perusal. A very lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff. By motion action, Council determined that the property owners provide sidewalk that is missing where the City has the right-of-way and more than 50% of the block has improvements as recommended by Staff in the following areas: a) On motion of Council Metrber Reid, Olson second - Ham Lane - Lodi Avenue to Elm Street. The motion was adopted by unanimous vote. b) On motion of Council Marber Olson, Re, -1 second - Hutchins Street - between York and Windsor, except for undeveloped parcel in subject area. The motion carried by unanimous vote. c) On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Olson second, Lockeford Street - Mills to Cross. The motion carried by unanimous vote. d) On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Olson second - California Street - Lockeford to Turner Road (including block surrounded by Hutchins, Lockeford, and California) The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Mlembers - Hinchman, Olson, Pinkerton, and Snider Noes: Council Members - Reid 2 e) On motion of Council Aimber Reid, Hinchman second - Stockton Street - Kettleman Lane to Vine Street (excepting parcels on the west side which will be improved when Valley Industry develops). -Alim:s M N jw