HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - April 15, 1981 (42)5
Vw
Q
Q4,Crr.y,.couNC -
'IL '.MEETING
y
Ar1115, 1981
P
t t
V ��t
F 7
E # �
5M
m
COMMENTS BY
CITY COUNCILMEN
MEMORANDUM Councilman Pinkerton responded to a Memorandum
FROM MAYOR that had been authorized by Mayor McCarty
McCARTY and addressed to the City Council and City Manager.
The Memorandum, among other things, addressed
the subjects of COG - transportation, Council
representation at various functions, etc.
sr,„ - a t� w� {� , •_ fig_
x.
r .5
a: `t
57
t - N C �. ,1 I•i",�,,� �i4$ ,,fiY xL-aJ,.y•.
�;' M a `La x .-( r ✓` `S:p _IkY'rr; �r��.iJi(,11+ n
CITY COUNCIL
WALTER KATNiCH, Mayor
JAMES A. McCARTY, Mayor Pro Tern
RICHARD L. HUGHES
ROBERT G. MURPHY
JAMES W. PINKERTON. Jr.
f
CITY OF LODI
CiTY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95240
(209) 334-5634
April 13, 1981
M E M 0 R A n D U M
TO: City Councilmen
City Manager
FROM: James A. McCarty
HENRY A. CLAVES, )r.
City Manager
ALICE h1. REIMCHE
City Clerk
RONALD M. STEIN
City Attorney
SUBJECT: Summary of Agenda - San Joaquin County Council of Governments
Transportation Policy Committee, April 10, 1981, etc.
Attendance: Supervisor Costa
Councilman Davis, Manteca
Counc.il.man Reece, Ripon
Councilman Wilson, Tracy
Lowell Synder, Stockton Municipal Transit District
Larry Wieman, Director, District 10, Cal Trans
John Pettine, Deputy Director, District 10, Cal Trans
Frank Jaworiski, Commissioner, Port of Stockton
Action: Approved San Joaquin County Transportation Development
Claim for 1980-81. Includes:
For Public Transportation:
Tracy and Escalon Urban . . . . . . . . .26,313
Manteca Taxi.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,100
Lathrop -French Camp . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,600
Non Transit
Bridges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281,398
Roads and Streets . . . . . . . . . . . 1,303,000
Approved with dissent by Councilman Davis - Stockton
Metropolitan Transit District Claim for State Transit
Assistance Funds. Includes:
Contingency . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .12,500
Mini -Computer . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 150,000
Signs . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 5,000
Retrofitting busses . . . . .
. . . . . .30,000
Fuel Storage . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 60,000
Page 2
Comments: Using calculations from a Cal Trans Presentation
Total Sales Tax on Gasoline . . . . 716 Million Dollars
Total Tax raised by SB 325 for
transit, streets, and roads
1/4% of all Sales Tax . . . . . . 340 Million Dollars
To compensate for this unexpected money gap, legislature passed AB 620 which
now augments 325 revenues by 378 million, of which 55 million is earmarked
State Transit Assistance. By a population pro -ration, I estimate that the
City of Lodi should receive 1 4 mi11iondollars. To date, I know of no
plans for the City to receive these monies.
As you shall see, other agencies are eating up what I term Lodi money.
If Lodi must expand or enhance the present transit program, and if the
Transit Assistance Funds are depleted, then Lodi must dip into its SB 325
funds leaving less money for streets.
The Transit Assistance Funds are now allocated as discretionary, or first
come, first serve. I severly criticize myself for voting this way, not
having even a remote idea that Lodi would be last in line.
Action: Approved three-year Federal Hiway Administration and
Urban Mass Transit Act claims.
Escalon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92,508
Tracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210,746
City of Lodi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ZERO
Action: City of Lodi fiscal year 80-81 Transportation Development
Act claim amendment.
Approved a transfer of 45,000 from transit to streets and
roads, thus building that fund to 614,466.
Action: Established list of priorities for Federal Aid Urban,
Federal Aid Secondary, California Aid Airports, and State
Hiway Program
Applicable in or about the City of Lodi (State Hiways)
Mokelumne River Bridge Lane, Priority #3 out of 16
Cherokee -Hiway 12 turn lane, Priority #8
Federal Aid Urban
Stockton Street, Priority #4 out of 17
Hutchins -Route 12 #8
Federal Aid Secondary -none applicable
California Aid to Airports -none applicable
Action: COG Regional Transportation Improvement Program
Federal Hiway Administration, and the California Trans-
portation Commission require this document by April 1
of each year. The document contains a variety of planning
information pertaining to transportation, transit and
Page 3
elements contingent thereto.
Staff did mention that Lodi transit information was
absent.
Stockton Cross Town Freeway and Mokelumne River Bridge
Lane are included in the Regional Transportation Improve-
ment, but have historically been rejected from the
Transportation Improvement Program adopted by the Califor-
nia Hiway Commission and the California Department of
Transportation. COG Staff and I shall attend the Califor-
nia Hiway Commission public hearing and give testimony
favoring these projects.
Action: San Joaquin County Claim for State Transit Assistance Funds.
,r The County was granted 8,697 to cover 60 days in wages for
five.CETA drivers whose wages were terminated.
County will return with a request from this fund amounting
to approximately 50,000 for the next fiscal year.
I vigorously opposed this concept, while watching City
of Lodi money fly out the window.
Action: City of Escalon Amendment to the RTIP, UMTA Section 18
Grant Escalon's transit funding for the next five years
is planned around an expenditure of 327,900 from San
Joaquin County, Escalon TDA (minimum), Farebox, UMTA
Section 18, and 78,400 from State Transit Assistance
Fund.
Comment: Gentlemen: For whoever has time to read this message,
I leave the COG transportation meeting feeling like a
piece of regurgitated hamburger. The City of Lodi is
getting punched out. I DO NOT blame Staff for this result
as I feel that Staff has not received ample policy direction
from Council.
May I suggest a meeting in the near future between
Council and Staff in an attempt to set a more aggressive
program in motion?
For your information, meetingsattended Monday thru Sunday April 6-12
Wednesday, April 8 COG Joint Powers Study Committee with:
t
Supervisor Yoshikawa
Supervisor Alva
Chuck Dixon, County Administrator
Councilmen Fietmeyer, Focha and Fulton
Thursday, April 9 Chamber of Commerce Sponsored Youth in Business Day
Cities and County, Manteca with Councilman Pinkerton
and City Manager Henry Glaves
r
Page 4
Friday, April 10 COG Transportation Policy Committee
This level of COG is advisory to the COG Executive
Committee, Councilman Pinkerton representing Lodi
Saturday April 11 Record Factory Opening
Sunday, April 12 Rap Session with Ed DeBenedetti regarding theft of
equipment at Dodgers Stadium, additional softball
diamonds, park security, etc. Late Sunday, I learned
that a youngster fell from the bleachers.
Comment: I stipulate that the small effort which I have put forth
in behalf of the City of Lodi measures only franctionally
to that expended by my veteran associates. I only
mention these events in favor of cooperation and communi-
cation.
I plan to request Councilman Katnich to meet with the
City Manager, and Department Heads Recreation and Police
to discuss areas relating to misconduct and vandalism
in and about City parks, and remedies thereto.
Also, I plan to ask Councilman Pinkerton to research the
status of the Lodi Industrial Group, and make a recommenda-
tion as to the method which City Council and Staff can
be of assistance to this group.
I shall request that Councilman Murphy act as my alternate
on the Hiway 12 Committee.
I am proposing that the City Council meet at least once
each year with appointees to the various City Commissions
and Boards.
I would like to establish a rotating dignitary list, includ-
ing all Councilmen, including alternates for Grand Openings,
speaking engagements, etc. Your comments will be appreciated.
Councilman Hughes is our anchor man on the League of
California Cities, and NCPA, nevertheless, I would like him
to make any presentations within his purview.
I have asked City Attorney Stein to review the Brown Act
to find any area therein allowing Councilpersons to have
informal group rap sessions.
I have written Mrs. Phyllis Lamphere, Regional Director
Economic Development Administration, urging her department
to allow the City of Lodi a high priority in any future
public project funding, citing the long standing storm
drainage planning of the City, the high unemployment
ratio , the availability and strategic location of our
Page 5
industrial Park, and the potential of new jobs, and increased
tax base, all hinging upon the storm drainage project.
Lastly, I have had the opportunity to have several very
productive conferences with City Manager Henry Glaves.
As a priority item, we discussed the concentration of
storm drainage funds aimed at completing the line from
C-1 basin to the river. Concentration in building and
development has currently swung from residential to
commercial -industrial. The industrial park area of the
City is a beehive o r activity. Please take time to drive
through those areas. I feel it reasonable to say that
if Council and Staff offer our full support and encourage-
ment to these eager developers, the City may reap immediate
reward from increased tax base, and new jobs. I solicit
your comments towards these views.
James A. McCarty
Mayor
Copies: Council
City Manager
Postscript: Gentlemen: I beg your indulgence one final time in
respect to another potential money-maker for our City,
namely, our soft -ball facilities. Please try to make
time for a drive some weekend touring the City's beautiful
and well operated recreational facilities.
Lawrence School playground will house two and possibly
three first class ball diamonds. Ed has revamped City
league schedules, making our current two diamonds available
for tournaments, now limited to 16 teams, who pay the City
approximately $500.00 for the weekend. With three addi-
tional diamonds, and with a number of tournaments
greater than the 20 scheduled so far this year, plus a
nominal increase in rent, I can see revenues in the scope
of $50,000.00 per year from our facilities. Also, we
could offer our own participating citizens expanded
facilities.
A fringe benefit which Councilman Katnich and I brought
out last year, is a lesser burden on police, and added
tax revenues from Hotel -Motel, cigarettes, sales, etc.
Your comments on this matter will be appreciated.