HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - April 4, 1984 (31)CITY COUNCIL MEETING-,.
Y APRIL 4, 193404-0,
Following introduction of the matter by Staff, Council , on
motion of Council Mmber Pinkerton, Reid second, extended
the opening date for receipt of bids for Asphalt Materials
to Tuesday, April 17, 1984.
'tat �
0
.
1) Viola Reiswig Parcel No. 043-031-05
J) Harry Wiebe. Manager
Cal Gas, Lodi Parcel No. 043-033-03
k) James E. Flaherty, Secretary
Lodi Aerie No. 848.
Fraternal Order of Eagles Parcels No. 043-036-15
Also addressing the Council regarding the subject was J.
Paul Dumont. Senior Vice President. Wulff. Hansen and Co.
Mr. Dumont responded to questions regarding the proposed
district and the financing thereof.
The following persons spoke on behalf of the proposed
Assessment District:
a) Fred Weybret. 125 N. Church St-reet. Lodi
b) Terry Knutson. 213 S. School Street, Lodi
c) Jack Bowen. 218 S. School Street. Lodi
d) LAI "ff Ba"ffoni. -118 W Oak Street. Lodi
e) Mike Lapenta. 1718 E. FAgewood Drive. Lodi
f) Pastor Richard Lundgren, First United Methodist Qwreh
g) Ann Meyer. Sacramento and Pine Street property owner
The following persons spoke in opposition
a) Mr. Vass representi-ng the Lodi Senior Ctti=zees Club
113 N. School Street Parcel No. 043-024-07
b) Mr. Mark Stevens representing Viola Re"iswig.
13 N. Qnirch Street Parcel No 043-031-05
c) Mr. Jim Flaherty. representing the Fraternal- Order of
Eagles Parcel No. 043-036-16
21 W. flak St.
d) W. Lloyd Jentoff Parcel No. 043-048-01
216 and 228 S.Sacramento St.
e) Mr. Ed DeJong Parcel No. 043-022-07
10:1 N. Church St.
f) Mr. C. H. Biewett Parcel No. 043-046-11 and
221 t 229 S. Sacramento St. 043-046-12
g) Ms. We. Roberts Parcel No. 043=024-02
118 N. Qiurch Street
h) Albert Barone Parcel No. 013-026-10
11 W. Elm Street
There being no other persons wishing to speak on the matter,
the public portion of the hearing was closed.
It was determined that an 8.72% protest of the square
footage within the district had been received:
Following additional discussion, on Motion of Council Member
Reid, Murphy second, Council adopted the following
Resolutions
Resolutions by unanimous vote of all mobers of the Council
present:
a) Resolution No. 84-039 - A Resolution Ordering
Reduction to Assessments and Directing Amendment
to Brigineer's Report.
it
..,.,..:. ..,...,^r.T"�i^�,v...� -vz rr; �^.::t'S'�.':"'?:�...- ,. .. ..,.,^•�k<,":""'.;�'^.�'°`°.,s,*�ft#�ft�5.,"^ai,'i�!'r'.(:7-' .. - .... .. .. v. e,,,.
�Plr
oGocli . t¢r ao. 848
FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES
Telephone ( 209 ) 36 '-5679 Meets'.UP?y Thursday
April 3, 1984
Lodi City Council
c/o Alice Reimche, City Clerk
ladies and Gentlemen:
The Fraternal. Order of Eagles, as owners of property in Zone 42
of the proposed Downtown Assessment District. (Assessment Lot
Number 90 - Assessors Parcel Number 043-036-15), do protest the
forming of an Assessment District by some of the merchants at the
expense of the property owners.
We do not oppose the improvement of downtown Lodi, only the forming
of the Assessment District to accomplish these improvements at a
great expense to the property owners. 'oIe believe far more improve-
ments can be accomplished by using the Community Redevelopment Law
of California, which could have a much broader coverage on improv-
ing a larger section of Lodi at little or no additional expense to
property owners, except what they will be paying in property taxes
anyway.
An Assessment District that is cosmetic in nature serves only to
add an additional expense on the property owners in order to
subsidi2� the downtown me -chants. According to the IRS, an
Assessment is not a tax and is not deductible. This exoen.se cannot
be passed onto the lessor unless they agree to pay it on their own.
Those of us who own property that is not commercial in nature have
no Y:ay to recover this expense short of selling our property, if
possible.
We hone the City Council will take a long look at all the property
and come up with a solution that is fair to all the property owners,
not just part of the downtown merchants.
Very truly yours,
DI EAGLES LODGE. #848
cretary
C
M
CAL GAS —LODI
April 3, 1984
Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk
City of Lodi
Lodi CA 95240
12
Re: Lodi United Downtown Assessment District
Beautification Project
Dear Mrs. Reimchet
We, Cal Gas Lodi, wish to register a protest
against the proposed Downtown Assessment District
Beautification Project (Parcel 043-433-03).
We are proposed to the entire concept of the
assessment. The benefits we might receive
from this improvement seem very minute in
comparison to the investment.
Sincerely,
CAL GAS LODI
1
}fairy Wiebe
Manager
HW/mr
J
106 WEST ELM STREET • LODI, CA 95240 • (209) 368-0681-LODI • (209) 466-9621-STOCKTON
tic t.�C
fo�0�'� lJrui/���, 9j1Mn 1di_ d(G(A%Q„rL,
�PA./J✓�C�OX. F'E�'�' W Rh^fP lW.C'C, bL'C
y-'
/�llu-/` 2G.CGr'Ge P. h/-L� l�•C�/YCL�j/, m�'K/
tkl i.�cae, ui� n�� vn�a✓
du�tn�uve ?�}r, ter, a�uoYt �fn� �'c
I/Y71-' �ilfi7-CG�� l�,L�'/��e9 O�-tJGi�7_piyfp �C�
LC/BYI � �q4�uFi/'/ Q�iL/G''L✓rdI'. � wa[dzt[�
in.A sr]a✓i.aq Bn t�ay2tileci
WON i RPM
Aa-tm 72�
40
��Z'
, P,, 0
�1xat-4e_
19
E
ED DEJONG BURDETTE DEJONG DARYL D. DEJONG ORVILLE DEJONG
DEJONG INSURA.NCE��;:
101 NORTH CHURCH STREET
LOD1. CALIFORNIA _.ftp
� ..
TEL[PNONE 369.3663
March 30, 1984
Lodi United Downtown Assessment
District Beautification Project
City of Lodi, California
RE: Parcel 043-02207 Assessment $ 10562.09
101 No. Church Street, Lodi, California
We understand we are to be included in the above assessment
district, yet no one has ever approached us to be included.
We also understand very little, if anything, will be done to
our frontage or intersection. This is understandable because
we have already landscaped our property plus we have nine
off-street parking spaces. Of the downtown merchants and/or
property owners, how many have provided off-street parking
for their employees and clients?
Some of the downtown merchants and property ow-ners wish to
beautify their property; also some intersection work, basically
on School Street --why then don't they pay for this themselves.
Surely if the benefits of having trees and shrubs along their
property will keep their property values up and bring more
customers in, these same property owners should be more th-an
willing to pay the bill. Why should property owners that al-
ready have these improvements on their property help pay for
these improvements for other owners?
Talking to some of the merchants downtown, we are given the
impression that trees, shiubs and nice looking intersecti-ons
will do nothing to bring them more customers. It still comes,
down to three basic things that the public looks for ---convenience
in parking, quality of service and prices.
We, therefore, object to being included in the assessment
district and paying for someone elses bill to improve their
property. We further wish to be excluded from this assessment
district.
S'n5er ly,
Burdctte D Jo g.
Partner
l
Odd Fellows Hall Association of Lodi
LODI. CALWORNIA
-
�
i
bul
at V,,
ct
Y
Oy73
a�3_
4
SENIOR 1., IZENS CLUB OF LODI. INC.
113 North Schoot Street
Lodi, California 95240
(209) 369-9798
Lodi, Calif
March 299'19 4
Lodi United Downtown Assessment
Beautifiaction Project
City of Lodi
c/o Alice 1M. Reimche,, City Clerk
City Hall
221 W. Pine
Lodi, Calif. 95240
Re: Beautification Pro ject
City of Lodi
County Assessors Parcel
No. 043-024-07
Assessment No. 65
Gentlemen:
We, the Senior Citizens Club of Lodi, Ince; a non-
profit organization, exempt from State and Federal
tax, hereby request exemption from assessment No. 65
for the beautification project of Lodi.
We have nothing to sell for profit and will receive
no monetary advantage from this project.
mb/GP
c*ce
��ours Ve rue P-iVdWesryesident
Lodi Senior Citizens Club
113 No. School St.
Lodi, Calif. 95240
• ` $ Telephone (209) 368.8617
Jokay QUICk �witir +►
S WEST ELM — LODI, CALIFORNIA 95240
March 28, 1984
Alice M. Reimche,
City Clerk,
221 W. Pine
Lodi, California 95240
Dear Alice
As owner of property Parcel 043-026-16, Assessment Lot Humber 139, 5 - 7 West Elm,
Lodi, in the concept study, Lodi Downtown Improvement Plan.
I protest and go on record against this concept of improvements and assessments of
property involved in this beautification project for the city of Lodi.
There have been many changes in the assessment figures and formula, since the original
figures, especially relative to Zone 3. Espec'.aly in the enormous increase in the amount
of our assessments.
I demand a complete re -contact and confirmation of all signatures and on all the
petitions with the final acerurd assessment figures.
Since all this gerrymandering has taken place subsequent to the original, this plan is
insufficient and inequitable to accomplish tine results for which it was intended.
I challenge the formula that sets Zone 3 so high and the lowering of Zone 1 and Zone 2.
Sincerely, �c
Ed win 0. Dammel.
A Complete Line of Quality Offset Printing
O`dd Fellows Hall. Associafion of Lodi
P. O. BOX 1-24
L LODI, CALIFORNIA
Wd-11 v
tt
,tom �, �. ,�LL /�i-E� �' •Z 'Z c?t�� CL' � t .,-t-t1J'f /.L �•yi �� /L�YL
akewett0a(Lkq..-,.
ICE CREAM AND MIL L
K
==1 *OUT" SACV1AMENT0 ST*&CT • 3�1i.1ai9; L j . ,. C
L.ODI. CALIFORNIA 95240
,'arch 22, 1984 _i;t�
ALICE City Clerk
City T;nll, Lodi, CA • 95240
As owner of property Parcel No. 043-046-11, 221 S. Sacramento
-treet and Parcel 11o. 043-046-12, 2"'9 S. Sacramento Street in
the Concept Study, Lodi Downtown Trnrovement Plan --
I protest and go on record against t1n s concept of improve-
ments and assessments of property involved in this Beauti
ficntion Project for the City of Lodi.
There have been many changes in the sseessoent figures and
formula since the original .figure, especially relative to
Zone 3.
I demand a complete A-ccnitact and confirm<ation of all
signatures on all the petitions with the final accred
assessment firr
Since all this gerrymandering has taken place subsequent to
the original, this plan is insuffient and inequitable to
accomplish the results for whic'► it was intended.
I challenge the forr:ula that sets Zone 3 so high and
Zone 1 lower.
Respectfully submitted,
C. tr TT
.. ,,....w«y....,.._•.,.:..�..b...».-.-..wv..,.-...o.ra-4•esa-RWKpdk.�'f
SEC:
i'
RESOLUTION NO. 84-0.39
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LODI, CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION ORDERING REDUCTION OF ASSESSMENTS
AND DIRECTING AMENDMENT TO ENGINEER'S REPORT
LODI UNITED DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lodi, California, that
WHEREAS, on February 22, 1984, said Council adopted its Resolution No.
84-17, A Resolution of Intention to Acquire and/or Construct Improvements, to order the
acquisition and/or construction of public improvements, as more particularly described fn
said Resolution; the estimated cost of said improvements was $851,907.00, and the
estimated contribution by the City of Lodi was $773,000..00, leaving a balance of
$578,907.00 to be assessed;
WHEREAS, following the opening of bids for the work, and -the negotiations for
the sale of the bonds to be issued upon the unpaid assessments, said assessments should be
reduced to reflect the reduction in the cost of construction, and the estimated amount of
interest to be earned on the proceeds of the bonds pending disbursement for the project
costs,
NOW, THEREFORE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The total assessment is hereby reduced to $565,638.63, and that each of
the Individual assessments be ratably reduced to reflect the reduction in the cost of
construction per district zones, and the estimated interest to be earned on the investment
of the bond proceeds pending disbursement for the project costs.
2. The Engineer of Work is authorized and directed to make the changes
hereinabove ordered in the Engineer's Report and assessment on file herein.
DATED: April 4, 1984.
I, ALICE M. REIMCHE, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 84-039_ Was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lodi, heldApril 4, 1984, 5y the following vote.-
AYES:
ote:AYE& Councilmen- Murphy, Pin-kerton, Snider, and
Reid
NOES: Councilmen - None
ABSENT: Council -men- Olson
ABSTENTIONS: Councilmen - None
-I-
LICE M. REIN/ HE, City Clerk
_._..-.�....._.«_»..,.......�..,-.c,,.,.,..._n-,..«.-........,.».....,.�*w..,.....„ter ....,.,
CI7Y COUNCIL
MM M. OIS0114. Maya QITY OF L O D
IOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
Maya Pro Tempore CITY HAtt, 221 WEST PINI STREET
ROBERT G. MURPHY POST OFFICE BOX 320
MMES W. PINKER70K If. LODI. CALK ORNIA 95241
FRED M. REID (209) 334.5634
April 10, 1984
Mr. Timothy Rachman
141 East Acacia Street
Stockton, California
Dear Tim:
HE R) A. CLAVES. It.
City !Manager
ALICE M REINICHE
Cety Cleek
RONALD M. STEIN
City Attorney
Enclosed herewith please find certified copies of Resolutions
No. 84-039 and 84-042 inclusive pertaining to the Lodi Downtown
Assessment District 'Beautification project.
Thank you so much far all your h<el p i 1 this matter, and if we
can provide any further information or if you have any further
questions, please do not hesitate to call this office.
Very truly yours,
Al ice M. Reimche
City Clerk
AMR:jj
Enc
RESOLUTION NO, 84-04.0
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LOD19 CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT
LODI UNITED DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lodi, California, that
WHEREAS, on February 22, 1984, said Council adopted its Resolution No.
84-17, A Resolution of Intention to Acquire and/or Construct Improvements, to order the
acquisition and/or, construction of public improvements, as more particularly described in
said Resolution, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Notice Inviting Bids duly giver and published by the
City Clerk of said City, the City Clerk did in open session on the 22nd day of March, 1984,
publicly open, examine and declare s11 sealed proposals or bids for the work to be done and
Improvements to be made, as described and specified in Resolution of Intention,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, as follows:
1. That said Council hereby rejects all of said proposals or bids, except that
hereinafter mentioned, and hereby awards the contract for doing the work and
Improvements and furnishing the materials, supplies and equipment necessary therefor to
the lowest responsible bidder, to wit.
CLAUDE C. WOOD COMPANY
at the unit prices named in said bid.
2. That the Mayor of said City is hereby authorized to make and enter into a
written contract with said successful bidder and to receive and approve all bonds in
connection t`erewith, and the Ci=ty Clerk of -aid City Is hereby, directed to attest his
signature and affix thereto the official seat of said City.
DATED: April 4, 1984.
I, ALICE M. REIMCHE, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that
RessoIution No. 84- 040 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lodi, held April 4, 1984, by the following vote.-
AYES:-
ote:AYES: Councilmen- Murphy, Pinkerton, Snider, and
Reid
NOES: Councilmen- None
ABSENT: Counc;'men - Olson
ABSTENTIONS: Councilmen- None
A ICE ;44. REI HE, City Clerk
-1-
P,91 11!!Mlli ;1!
7
CITY COUNCIL HENRY A
Ctt�v Manager
. Mayor
IV[-tyN M_ OLSONI T Y 0 F L 0 DJ' -L -
10"N R. (Randy) SNIDER ALICE M REINICHE
Mayor Pro Tempore CITY HALL. 2ZI %VFST PINE STREET City Clerk
ROBERT G. MURPHY POST OFFICE BOX 320 RONALD All STEIN
IAMFS W. PINKMON. It LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 CAV Attorney
FRED M. REID (209) 334-5634
April 10, 1984
Mr. Timothy Nachman
141 East Acacia Street
Stockton, California
Dear Tim:
Enclosed herewith please find certified.copies of Resolutions
No. 84-039 and 84-042 inclusive pertaining to the Lodi- Downtown
Assessment District Beautification project.
Thank you so much for all your help in, this matter, and if we
can provide any further informatton or if you have any further
questlons, please do not hesitate to call this off -ice.
Very truly yours,
ez A
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
AMR:jj
Enc.
r
RESOLUTION NO. 84-041
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LODI, CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION AWARDING SALE OF BONDS
LODI UNITED DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lodi, California, that
WHEREAS, this Council has received a proposal to purchase bonds to be issued
to represent unpaid assessments levied in the proceedings under Resolution No. 84-171' A
Resolution of Intention to Acquire and/or Construct Improvements, adopted by said
Council on February 22, 1984, for the acquisition and/or construction of public
Improvement --:4 as more particularly described in said Resolution;
]NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That upon consummation of special assessment district proceedings said
bends be, and they are hereby ordered sold to WULFF, HANSEN do CO., San Franeisco,
California, said sale to be subject to all the terms and conditions set forth in said
accepted proposal, and that the interest rate of said bonds be, and the same is hereby
fixed at the ratb stated in said proposal.
2. That the Director of Finance be, and he is- hereby directed to have said
bonds printed, and that the same be signed,, sealed and delivered to said purchaser upon.
receipt of the amount therefor, in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in
said proposal and the proceedings held pursuant to said Resolution and any amendments
thereto.
DATED: AprH 4, 1984.
4 ALICE M. REIMCHE, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 84- Q41was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Couneil
of the City of Lodi, held April 4, 1984, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen- Murphy, Pinkerton, Snider, and
Reid
NOES: Councilmen- None
ABSENT: Councilmen - Olson
ABSTENTIONS: Councilmen - Non
ALICE M. REIMCnE,, City Clerk
-1-
X.
CITY COUNCIL HENRY A- GLAVES. It.
ITY OF LOD 1*4
City Magerpe
44�' ft
EVELYN M-OLSON, Mayor ALICE &I REIMCHE
JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER city Clerk
Mayor Pro Tempore CITY HALL, 2,21 WEST PINE STREET
ROBERT G. MURPHY POSIT OFFICE Box 320 RONALD Xt STEM
JAMES W. PINKERTON. it. LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 City Attorney
FRED M. RE ID (209) 334-S634
April 10, 1984
Mr. Timothy Rachman
141 East Acacia Street
Stockton, California
Dear Tim:
Enclosed herewith please find certified copies of Resolutions
No. 84-039 and 84-042 inclusive pertaining to the Lodi Downtown
Assessment District Beautification project.
Thank you so much for all your hel,p, i -n thAs matter, and if we
can provide any further informati�o-n or If you have any further
questions, please do not hesitate to calf this office.
Very truly yours,
A
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
AMR: JJ
Enc.
a
RESOLUTION NO. 84-042
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LODI, CALIFORNIA
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY,
ADOPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, AS AMENDED, CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENT, AND ORDERING THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENTS
LODI UNITED DOWNTOWN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lodi, California, that
WHEREAS, on February 22, 1984, said Council adopted its Resolution No.
84-17, A Resolution of Intention to Acquire and/or Construct Improvements, declaring
that the public interest, convenience and necessity, required, and that it intended to order,
the acquisition and/or construction of certain public improvements, as more particularly
described in said Resolution, and referred the proposed improvements to the Engineer of
Work of said City, he being the officer having charge and control of the acquisitions and
improvements in and for said City of the kind described in said Resolution, and being a
competent person employed by said City for that purpose;
WHEREAS, said Council thereby directed said Engineer of Work to make and
file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant
to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the Streets
and Highways Code;
WHEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with the City Clerk of said City
whereupon the Clerk presented it to said Council for consideration;
WHEREAS, said Council thereupon duly considered said report and each and
every part thereof, and found that it contained all the matters and things called for by the
aforesaid provisions of said Code, including (1) maps and descriptions of lands and
easements, and a general description of the works or appliances to be acquired, (2) plans
and specifications of the proposed improvements to be made, (3) estimate of carts,
(4) diagram of district, and (5) an assessment according to benefits, all of which was done
In the form and manner required by said Act;
WHEREAS, said Council found that said report and each and every part thereof
was sufficient in every particular and determined that it should stand as the report for all
subsequent proceedings under said Code and Resolution of Intention, whereupon said
Council pursuant to the requirements of said Code, appointed Wednesday, the 4th day of
April, 1984, at 8:00 P.M. of said day in the regular meeting place of said Council,. Council
Chambers, Lodi, California, as the time and place for hearing protests In relation to said
proposed acquisitions and/or improvements, and directed the Clerk of said City to give
notice of said hearing as required by said Act;
WHERE'I.S, it appears that notice of said hearing was duly and regularly ma=iled,
posted and published in the time, form and manner required by said Act, as evidenced by
the declarations on file with said City Clerk, whereupon said hearing was duly and
regularly held at the time and place advertised in said notice;
-1-
i
WHEREAS,13 persons interested, objecting to said acquisitions and/or
Improvements, or to the extent of the assessment district, or to the proposed assessment
or diagram, or to the maps and descriptions, or to the grades at which said work will be
done, or to the Engineer's estimate of the costs and expenses thereof, filed writ -ten
protests with the Clerk of said City at or before the time set for said hearing, and all
persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all
matters and things pertaining to said acquisitions and/or improvements were fully heard
and considered by said Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, said Council does hereby find, determine and order as
follows:
1. That the owners of one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for the
cost of said project did not at or prior to the time fixed for said hearing, file written
protests against the said acquisitions and/or improvements, or as to the Engineer's
estimate of costs and expenses of said project, or against the maps and descriptions, or
against the grades at which said work is proposed to be done, or against the diagram and
assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof.
2. That any and all protests made either to the quest -ions. of the public interest,
convenience and necessity of making said acquisitions and/or improvements under said
Resolution, or to said proposed acquisitions and/or improvements, or the grades to which
said work is proposed to be done, or to the extent of the assessment district, or the maps
and descriptions, or the amounts of the several assessments, and all persons desiring to- be
heard In relation to any of said matters, whether as protestants or otherwise, have been
fully heard and considered, and said protests are hereby overruled.
3. That the public interest, convenience and necessity require the acquisitions
and/or improvements in the manner proposed, and Division 4 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California shall not apply.
E
4. That the district benefited by said acquisitions and/or improvements and to
be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and the exterior boundaries thereof, Is
the district described In said Resolution.
F:
5. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of
said acquisitions and/or improvements, and of the incidental expenses in connection
therewith, contained in said report, as amended, be, and it Is hereby finally adopted and
approved as the Engineer's total and detailed estimate of the costs and expenses of said
acquisitions and/or improvements.
S. That the plans and specifications for the proposed improvements, contained'
s
In said report, as amended, be, and they are hereby finally adopted and approved as the
plans and specifications to which said work shall be done as called for in said Resolution.
T. That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, as
i
contained in said report, as amended, be, and the same are hereby approved and confirmed.
r
_2-
k
e
0
8. That the public interest, convenience and necessity require, and said Council
does hereby order the acquisitions and/or improvements to be made as described in and in
accordance with said Resolution, on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City,
reference to which is hereby made for a more particular description of said acquisitions
and/or improvements and for further particulars, pursuant to the provisions of said Aet.
9. That the diagram showing the assessment district referred to and described In
said Resolution, and also the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of
land within said district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution,
each of which subdivisions have been given a separate number upon said diagram, as
contained in said report, as amended, be, and It is hereby finally approved and confirmed
as the diagram of the properties to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of said
acquisitions and improvements.
10. That the assessment of the total amount of costs and expenses of the proposed
acquisitions and/or improvements, upon the several subdivisions of land in said assessment
district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said subdivisions,
respectively, from said acquisitions and improvements% and of the expenses incidental.
thereto, as contained in said report, as amended, be, and the same is hereby finally
approved and confirmed as the assessment to pay the costs and expenses of said
Improvements. .
11. That the Engineer's Report, as amended, be, and the same is hereby finally
approved and confirmed as a whole.
12. That the Clerk of said City shall forthwith deliver to the Director of Public
Works of said City the said assessment together with the diagram thereto attached and
made a part thereof, as confirmed by this Council, with his certificate of such
confirmation thereto attached and of the date thereof; and that said Director of Public
Works shall record said diagram and assessment In his office in a suitable book to.be kept
for that purpose, and shall append thereto his certificate of the date of such recording,
and such recordation shall be and constitute the assessment roll herein..
13. After the recording of the assessment and diagram In the office of the Director
of Public Works, the City Clerk of said City shall execute and record a notice of
assessment in the office of the County Recorder in substantially the form provided in
Section 3114 of the Streets and Highways Code.
14. The City Clerk of said City shall file in the office of the County Recorders a
copy of the assessment diagram. The County Recorder shall endorse on the copy of the
assessment diagram filed with him the time and date of filing and shall fasten the same ,
securely in the Book of Maps of Assessment Citys in which he is obligated to keep
boundary maps of assessment districts and shall index such assessment diagram by the
name of the district conducting the proceedings and b, reference to page of the book of
maps of assessment districts in which the boundary map of said assessment district was
filed in said book.
-3-
i
15. That said Director of Public Works, upon the recording of said diagram and_
assessment, shall mail to each owner of real property within the assessment district, at
Ns list known address as the same appears on the tax rolls of the City or on file in the
office of the City Clerk, or to both addresses, if said address is not the same, or to
general delivery when no address so appears, a statement containing a designation by
street number or other description of the property assessed sufficient to enable the owner
to Identify the same, the amount of the assessment, the date of recordation of said
assessment, the time and place of payment thereof,. the effect of failure to pay within
such time, and a statement of the fact that bonds will be issued upon the unpaid
assessments In the manner provided in Improvement Bond Act of 1915, Division 10 of the
Streets and Highways Code, and that the applicable provisions of Part 11.1 of said Act:
providing an alternative procedure for the advance payment of assessments and the
calling of bonds, shall apply. The last installment of such bonds shall mature not to
exceed fourteen (14) years from the second day of July next succeeding ten (10) months
from their date, principal and interest to be reasonably amortized, the proceeds of sa d.
bonds to be invested and Interest thereon paid into the redemption fund of said bonds.
16. That the Director of Public Works shall also cause Notice to Pay Assessments
to be published once a week for two successive weeks in the Lodi News -Sentinel a
newspaper published and circulated in said City, that said assessment has been recorded,
that all sums assessed thereon are due and payable immediately; that the payment of said
sums Is to be made within thirty (30) days after the date of recording said assessment,
which date shall be stated in said notice, and of the fact that bonds will be issued upon
unpaid assessments as above provided.
DATED: April 4, 1984.
I, ALICE M. REIMCHE, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 84- 0 4 2 was passed and adopted at a regular- meeting of the City Council
of the City of Lodi, held April 4, 1984, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen- Murphy, Pinkerton, Snider, and
Reid
NOES: Councilmen None
ABSENT: Councilmen- Olson
ABSTENTIONS: Councilmen- None
-4-
ICE M. RELMORE, City Clerk
GITY COUNCIL
HENRY A. CLAVES. 1*.
Mayor
JOHN'RELYN M. OIy)
CITY O F L O D I
City Manaler
lOHN�R. (Randy) SNIDER
S
ALICE M. ItE1MCH£
Pro Tempore
CITY HALL. 221 WEST FINE STREET
City Clerk
ROBERT G. MURPHY
POST OFFICE BOX 320
RONALD M MIN
JAMES W. PINKERTOK Jr.
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241
City AC:�wnev
FRED M. REID
(209) 334.5634
April 10, 1984
Mr. Timothy Nachman
141 East Acacia Street
Stockton, California
Dear Tim:
Enclosed herewith please find certified copies of Resolutions
No. 84-039 and 84-042 inclusive pertaining- to the Lodi Downtown
Assessment District Beautification project.
Thank you so much for all your help in this matter, a.nd if we
can provide any further information or if you have any further
questions, please do not hesitate to call this office..
Very truly yours,
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
AMR:jj
Enc.
3 Striping
4 Landscaping i Irrigation
a Sawcut new treewlls w/rem
1 Fur. i Inst. trwwi l frame
m/brick pavers
c For. i Inst. 15 gal. trees
d Prov 6 Inst. C I tree grate
on School St.
V Fur. i Inst. Irrigation Sys
in planters f intersect.
f For. i Inst. Landscaping
complete I intersections
q Fur. 1 Inst Irrigation Sys
Arch L East Side
Sacramento St.
k Fur. i Inst. landscaping
complete ! Arch i East
Side Sacramento Street
S Traffic Signal Installation
a Pine/School
b Pine/Sacramento
Lump Sum -
EA 334
EA 287
EA 391
EA 95
EA 22
EA 22
Lump Sum -
Lump Sum
Lump Sue
Lump Sum
6
Arch Improvements
25654.00
a
Arch architectural i prov's
25000.00
- 24000.00
east one-half
Loop Sum
LODI UNITED DOWNTOWN
ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT BEAUTIFICATION
PROJECT
Roadway Excavation
Bid Tabulation
b
Compact Originrt Bround
SF
c
Bids Opened
3/22/84
d
Aggregate lase
T
Architect's
Estimate
Claude C.
Mood Co.
Teichert 6 Son
Item No.
Description
Unit Quantity Unit Price Tot Price
Unit Pr
Total Pr
Unit Pr
Total Pr
I
Intersections as Detailed
a
locust/School
Lump Sue
- 9244.00
9244.00
8892.00
8892.00
12650.00
12450.00
b
Ela/School
Lump Sao
- 28880.00
28880.00
34130.00
34130.00
40480.00
40480.00
c
Ping/School
Lump Sum
- 25791.00
25791.00
34834.00
34834.00
40480.00
40480.00
d
Oak/School
lump ::nm
- 29713.00
29713.00
33903.00
33903.00
37950.00
37950.00
e
Valaet/School
lump Sum
- 30068.00
30068.00
36429.00
36429.00
43010.00
43010.00
f
Lodi/School
Lump Sum
- 10094.00
10094.00
8844.00
8844.00
40480.00
40480.00
q
Pine/Cburch
Lump Sue
- 28128.00
28128.00
35330.00
55330.00
12650.00
12650.00
h
Vest one-half of Sacramento/
Lump Sue
- 12081.00
12081.00
20864.00
20664.00
25300.00
25300.00
Pine, incl. one Cl 6 C16
repl t NV cor.
2
School St. Alley Entrances
a
2 Alleys Ron locust/Ela
Lump Sum
- 5576.00
5576,00
9193.00
9193.00
6600.00
6600.00
b
2 Alleys btMa Elm/Pint
Lump Sum
- 5576.00
5576.00
9312:00
9312.00
5500.00
5500.00
c
1 Alley btwa Plat/Oak
Lump Sum
- 278L 00
2788.00
4708.00
4708.00
2640.00
2640.00
d
1 Alley btwo Oak/Malnut
Lump Sum
- 2788.00
2788.00
4707.00
4707.00
4180.00
4180.00
e
2 Alleys Ron Valnut/Lodi
lump Sue
- 5576.00
5576.00
9420.00
9420.00
3080.00
3080.00
3 Striping
4 Landscaping i Irrigation
a Sawcut new treewlls w/rem
1 Fur. i Inst. trwwi l frame
m/brick pavers
c For. i Inst. 15 gal. trees
d Prov 6 Inst. C I tree grate
on School St.
V Fur. i Inst. Irrigation Sys
in planters f intersect.
f For. i Inst. Landscaping
complete I intersections
q Fur. 1 Inst Irrigation Sys
Arch L East Side
Sacramento St.
k Fur. i Inst. landscaping
complete ! Arch i East
Side Sacramento Street
S Traffic Signal Installation
a Pine/School
b Pine/Sacramento
Lump Sum -
EA 334
EA 287
EA 391
EA 95
EA 22
EA 22
Lump Sum -
Lump Sum
Lump Sue
Lump Sum
6
Arch Improvements
25654.00
a
Arch architectural i prov's
25000.00
- 24000.00
east one-half
Loop Sum
7
Miscellaneous Street Iprov's
30000.00
a
Roadway Excavation
CY
b
Compact Originrt Bround
SF
c
Conr•ete Subgrade Compact.
SF
d
Aggregate lase
T
10428.85 10428.85 6457.00 6457.00 6000.00 6000.00
74.30 24816.20
138.40 39720.80
113.45 45039.65
356.80 33896.00
725.55 15962.10
506.70 11147.40
42.00 14028.00
110.00 31570.00
67.20 26678.40
261.71 24862.45
300.00 6600.00
240.00 5280.00
22.50 7515.00
135.00 38745.00
60.00 23820.00
205.00 1`9475.00
681.00 15004.00
409.00 8998.00
11000.00 11000.00 4800.00 4800.00 13500.00 13500.00
14000.00 14000.00 29356.00 29356.00 22500.00 22500.00
- 20000.00
20000.00
25654.00
25654.00
25000.00
25000.00
- 24000.00
24000.00
31944.00
31944.00
30000.00
30000.00
707
14688
9484
359
55600.00 55600.00 35932.00 35932.00 53000.00 53000.00
6.00 4242.00
0.20 2937.60
0.80 7587.20
12.00 4308.00
20.00 14140.00
0.18 2643.84
0.44 4172.96
18.89 6781.51
21.00 14847.00
0.30 44".40
0.40 3793.60
17.00 6103.00
Deduct
fr ltn 1 -8000.00
e
Aspkalt Concrete
T
473
38.00
18050.00
4R.1
20847.73
39.00
18523.00
f
Vertical Curs i Butter
LF
632
14.00
8848.00
10.68
6749.76
10.00
632=0.00
9
Sidewalk incl. tree well
openings
SF
11712
4.00
46848.00
2.10
24393.20
1.68
196716.16
k
Coemercial Driveway 16.
SF
1977
5.00
9883.00
2.64
5219:28
2.65
323-9.05
i
Street Sign Post
EA
1
80.00
80.00
200.00
200.00
100.00
100.00
1
Side Inlet Catck Basin
EA
1
300.00
300,00
3300,00
3300.40
500.00
504.40
k
12' Store Drain
!F
719
40.00
28760.00
36.99
26395.81
38.00
27322.00
1
48' Nankole
EA
!
1000.00
4000.00
1131.70
4606.80
1400.00
56".00
a
Excavation Safety lump Sue
-
1494.20
1494.20
100.00
140.00
1500.00
1`5H.00
a
Slurry Seal
SF
217200
0.43
10860.00
0.08
17376,00
.073
1629.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------New
Totals
Subtotal Itess 1,2,3,4a-f
377314.00
366061.85
394557.00 386337.00
(District)
Subtotal Itess 49-h,5,6,7
273000.00
265014.91
274222.21 274222.21
(city)
TOTAL
650314.00
6.11076.76
668779,21 660779.21
Alt. No. 1 Alternate planter
detail, total 22
20000.00
0.00 0..00
Alt. No. 2 Cast Iron tree gr.
in lieu of brick
total 361
69270.00
42400.00 42400.00
District Total */Alt 1
386061.85
394537.00 386557.00
District Total WAR 2
435331.85
4369:17.00 428957.00
District Total w/both Alt's
45533133
436957.00 428937.00
Deduct
fr ltn 1 -8000.00
Odd Fellows Hall Association of
i tom. C
1� f �• ,^-�=rift
rVi'r.
wok �r .zrlc-.en t7-wti. G, LAO
L��.. l4�•'a-r ti..a.x ts�,,L�,,,�.�.y,, 'U-'L. v- �-'C',A.�-.,., a.`.,,r,�
Im
SENIOR C . eZENS CLUB OF LODI. INC.
113 North School Street
Lodi. California 95240
(209) 369-9798, --
Lodi, C•a198-4-
f,.,
March 29: if '• t:
Lodi United Downtown Assessment
Beautifiaction Project
City of Lodi
c/o Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk
City Hall
221 W. Pine
Lodi, Calif. 95240
Re: Beautification Project
City of Lodi
County Assessors Parcel
No. 043.-024-07
Assessment No. 65
Gentlemen:
We, the Senior Citizens Club of Lodi, Inc.; a' non-
profit organization, exempt from State and Federal
tax, hereby request exemption from assessment No. 65
for the beautification project of Lodi.
We have nothing to sell for profit and will receive
no monetary advantage from this project.
rs fiery ru
!,a4—i
de, resident
Lodi Senior Citizens Club
113 No. School St.
Lodi, Calif. 95240
• Jokay Quick ` von• �t: • C. Telephone (209) 368.8617
5 WEST ELM — LODI, CAUFORNIA 952.10
March 28, 1984
Alice M. Reimche,
( ity Clerk,
221 W. Pine
Lodi, California 95240
Dear Alice
As owner of property Parcel 043-026.16, Assessment Lot Number 139, 5 - 7 West Elm,
Lodi, in the concept study, Lodi Downtown Improvement Plan.
I protest and go on record against this concept of improvements and assessments of
property involved in this beautification project for the city of Lodi.
a
There have been many changes in the assessment figures and formula, since the original
figures, especially relative to Zone & Especially in the enormous increase in the amount
of our assessments.
I demand a complete re -contact and confirmation of all signatures and on aU the
petitions with the final accrued assessment figures.
Since all this gerrymandering has taken place subsequent to the original, this plan is
insufficient and inequitable to accomplish the results for which it was intended.
I challenge the formula that sets Zone 3 so high and the lowering of Zone 1 and zone 2.
Sincerely,
Edwin O. Dammel.
A Complete Line of Quality Offset Printing
Orad Movis Hall Association of Lodi
P. d. sox 124
IODt. •s• CAL{fORNtA
cu..
3 — .0 r-- r
fie 014
;�� d-d,����r�t n� , ` �►--cin,. �/`Lt �� 't � � r �t.�,c�u��'`"
Mod- IAL( �.�dt•� l��c. c*�n arils 2�
�ue-v�AW
all*
0
lic
QE U9�tt CL l �
ICE CREAM AND MILK
221 *OUT" tACIMMiNTV tTJtRT ♦ 2et}YOIL&
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95240
i:areb 22, 1984
ALICE RyIt'CiE, City Clerk
City mall, Lodi, CA. 95240
As owner of property Parcel No. 043-046-11, 227. S. Sacramento
Street and Parcel ro. 043-046-12, 2"Q S. Sacramento Street in
the Concept Study, Lodi Downtown Ire^rovement Plan --
I protest and go on record against this concept of improve—
ments and assessments of property involved in this Peauti—
ficntion Project for the City of Lodi.
There have been many changes in the assessuer.t fir-ures and
formula since the original figure, esneciall�• relative to
Zone 3.
I demand a complete re—contact and confirmation of all
signatures on all the petitions with the final accrued
assessment figures.
Since all this gerrymandering has taken place subsequent to
the original, this plan is insuffient and inequitable.to
accomplish the results for which it was intended.
I challenge the formula that Gets Zone 3 so high and
Zone 1 lower.
Fespectfully submitted,
....•sew.w .. 4'f4t .+,—. _s....__..;.._3�.. �a..�. Yip
10
REC.;
ALICE _'�.
CITY 1
C.7y F
J14t., vo /z9