HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - April 3, 1985 (79)a "` w�, ;,,fir' t �'� �✓�,� � t i s s � r �t �,
.,x:�..'�==a..t.✓� ,.,� :.r�,.a.,..'Y:�.:�'s',`�� �'�� .�3.;.�� r� :. .. _ , ,- ... ..,. ._ .., , ..�..��.*?'�xi�. I�'7.-:v�e�.'-, .. r °�"� s�.'',�.,l��zi$.
n^n^c,,•• sw,-w<r.nbta.exmasS.f? .
CITY/00MY
f{s'93.#ehaww.eww„ s.v.��u--w:..wrx�
Council was apprised that the County of San Joaquin is request-
AKIRE,rNEff RE-
ing that the City of Lodi enter into an Agreement which
UUM TO
provides for the County to purchase the City of Lodi property
TRANSFER OF
at the Harney Lane Landfill for the sun of $1.00.
CVd ERSSHIP ON
HAISTEY LANE
The execution of this agreement would then make the County
SANITARY
fully responsible for the _proper closure for all of the
LANDFILL
existing Harney Lane Landfill and for any future maintenance or
APPROVED
monitoring as required by the State's Solid Waste Management
Board. Since the City of Lodi is not set up to do long-term
maintenance or monitoring on this type of facility, it is felt
that it is in the best interest of the City to transfer
ownership of the Harney Lane Landfill property to the County of
San Joaquin.
RES. NO. 85-42
CO=IL ADOPTED RESOLUTICN NO. 85-42 APPROVING UE MENDED
AGIMM BE11W04 THE CITY OF LCDI AMID THE C aMY OF SAN
JMWIN FCR THE MlaIASE OF REAL PMC EM AT THE HARVEY LANE
SANITARY LANDFILL AND AUIIMIZED ME MM AND CITY CLERK TO
EXJQJIE THEE SLBJEGT AGPMENr rV BEH ,LF OF THE CITY.
CITY OF LODI
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
DATE: March 25, 1985
SUBJECT: City -County Agreement Related.to Transfer of Ownership
on Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the
attached agreement.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The County of San Joaquin is requesting that the City
of Lodi enter into the attached agreement which provides for the County pur-
chasing our property at the Harney Lane Landfill for the sum of $1.
The execution of this agreement would then make the County fully responsible
for the proper closure for all of the existing Harney Lane Landfill and for
any future maintenance or monitoring as.required by the State's Solid Waste
Management Board. Since the.City of Lodi is not set up to do long-term main-
tenance or monitoring on this type of facility, it is felt that it is in the
best interest of the City to transfer ownership of the Harney Lane Landfill
property to the County of San Joaquin.
•
The Devirg Board. Inc.
MEMO-letterl CITY OF LODI
City Nall • 221 West Pine Street • Lodi, California 95240
(209) 331-5634
To. City Clerk Cate March 25, 1985
FROM: Public Works Director Subject Harney Lane Sanitary Landfi 11
Agenda item
Item MLN -72
This is to let you know that I have confirmed with Dave Rollins of the County
that this item must be on the agenda for April 3, 1985. The County is planning
to take the Harney Lane and Lee Hall purchase to the Board of Supervisors on
April 16. At that time they must have all approvals in hand; therefore, it is
required .that t1jeCouncil take action on April 3, 1985•`
Jac L. Ronsko
Pub is Works Director M
9~`F`"
+a• { Y"'Y l� a �4.�-z !^' a µi'-. i i� � i# rte, "»� �s ?b"fF ",.+� I � i . -i. .,�
?.... a ....
I ice. t.•S'.ii'
N_
AGREEMENT REGARDING HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 2nd day
of January 1975 by and between the CITY OF LODI, a municipal
corporation, hereinafter called "City", and the COUNTY OF SAN
JOAQUIN, a political subdivision of the State of California,
hereinafter called "County".
WHEREAS, City and County presently have title to certain
parcels of real and personal property within the area known as the
HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL, located at 14750 East
Harney Lane, Lodi, California, hereinafter called "Landfill"; and
WHEREAS, City has heretofore operated, maintained and
supervised said Landfill for the joint benefit of County and City; and
WHEREAS, City and County now deem it desirable that County
assume the sole responsibility for the operation, maintenance and
supervision of said Landfill; and
WHEREAS, the County -owned parcel of real property within
said Landfill is no longer usable as landfill; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the parcel owned by City still has a
useful life for the purpose of conducting landfill operations thereon,
NOW, THEREFORE, City and County do hereby agree as
follows
-
,y �`x1
^a Y
I. For valuable consideration and for services to be rendered
by County, City does hereby lease to County and County
does hereby take from City that real property situate in the
County of San Joaquin, State of California, described as
follows:
The Northeast Quarter of Section I9, Township 3 North,
Range 8 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian.
EXCEPT the West 60 acres of said Cuarter Section.
ALSO EXCEPT that certain strip of land conveyed to
East Bay Municipal Utility District by Deed dated
September 13, 1927, and recorded October 7,. 1927, in
Vol. ZOI of Official Records, page 26I, San Joaquin
County Records.
ALSO EXCEPT that portion deeded to the County for
road purposes.
TOGETHER with the personal property situate upon
said property owned by City and being the well; machine shop;
safe; desk; chair; a 50 -gallon fuel drum with pumping
capability, located within the machine shop; the three -horse-
power pump and 3, 000 gallon water tank.
County agrees that upon the end or sooner termination
of Lease, said personal property shall be returned to
City in substantially the same condition as the same now is,
usual wear and tear excepted.
�'
of the hereinabove referred -to safe at no cost to City.
4 t �
�_ ?`-�-a...r-w•r`i _"..'r''�rJ _.... -... �. -.
�t.}''.'it� ...ems-.� 2- � „w+t5 d.'a'.�Y�„
t3^ L f� 4^.4 i- ��
y.✓4. .��
SVT �
¢
This lease shall terminate as of the date that said real
property may no longer be used as a sanitary landfill. 'The
determination of this fact shall be made by County and such
,£aM1ti�•i*ac
the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency,
the Water Cuality Control Commission, or any other
.^I�
-2�. a.....- . �..f,.e..cs•L""r �C�.
. ,. ., n .-w.
any right to determine the use of the property in question
for a sanitary landfill. Any such closure shall be subject
to compliance with any of the regulations of any of the afore-
said regulatory bodies.
County agrees that upon the end or sooner termination
of Lease, said personal property shall be returned to
City in substantially the same condition as the same now is,
usual wear and tear excepted.
County is hereby given the right to change the combination
of the hereinabove referred -to safe at no cost to City.
2. This Lease and this Agreement shall commence as of
January 1, 1975.
This lease shall terminate as of the date that said real
property may no longer be used as a sanitary landfill. 'The
determination of this fact shall be made by County and such
determination shall at all times be subject to complying with
the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency,
the Water Cuality Control Commission, or any other
governmental agency and/or commission which may have
any right to determine the use of the property in question
for a sanitary landfill. Any such closure shall be subject
to compliance with any of the regulations of any of the afore-
said regulatory bodies.
3. County is hereby given the exclusive right to use the
remaining portion of City's real property which has been
-
unused for sanitary landfill purposes.
4. County will remove and return to City, at cor_-�mencement of
this Lease, any lock owned by City and used upon or within
said real property and will replace such locks with County
`=
locks at no cost to City. At the termination of this Lease,
said County locks shall remain the property of County and,
will be removed by County at no cost to City.
5. County shall be responsible for the maintenance and
preservation of all existing boundary line fences located upon
=
saidproperty.
6. City and County shall each have the right to continue, as they
have in the past, to use said Landfill for the dumping of
materials and/or debris delivered to the premises by their
respective vehicles at no cost to either party.
7. County will cause its representative's name to be inserted
in Paragraph 8 of the existing Lease of the HD -Z 1B tractor
used at said Landfill.
8. County agrees that City may continue to use a portion of the
site, as they have in tine past, for the purpose of oil mixing
native material. In this connection County agrees to deliver
approximately 500 cubic yards of native material from the
excavation of trenches to be created by County and said _
materials shall be stockpiled by County next to City's
c f
operation. City agrees to process and mix approximately
I00 cubic yards of dirt annually for County, for use by =
County at the site provided that the liquid asphalt for the
mix is paid for by County to City.
9. City shall have the right to have its franchise refuse
collector continue to deposit refuse collected from the
residents of the City of Lodi at said Landfill. City shall
pay to County commencing as of the effective date of this -
Agreement, an amount equal to five percent (5Yo) of the '
gross refuse fees collected from residents of the City.
The first payment shall be made by City to County on
March 1, 1975 and shall cover the period of collections
received by City for the month of January 1975 and payment
shall continue monthly thereafter for the succeeding months
of this Agreement. As of the close of the fiscal year on
June 30, 1975, County shall make an accounting and
determination of the cost of operation of said Landfill. In
the event that said operation has been operated at a loss,
then City agrees that the percentage will be increased from
51/6 to a maximum of seven percent (7%) of the collections
made by the City. In the event that said financial statement
shows that County has operated the site at a profit, then
said percentage figure shall be reduced from 5% to a
minimum of three percent (3%). Thereafter and for the
ensuing fiscal year this percentage figure shall remain,
unchanged based upon the foregoing formula until the
ensuing fiscal year of June 30, 1976 at which time a similar
adjustment will be made by the City and County following the
aforesaid formula and a like adjustment shall be. made annually
thereafter within the limitations set forth herein. it is
County's intent to operate said Landfill on a "break even"
basis. Therefore, in the event any monies or credits are
due either party by reason of the adjustments contemplated
by this paragraph, said payments or credits shall cover the
preceding six months and, thereafter, the preceding twelve
month,.. Payment of any monies or allowance of any credit
shall be made within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year
during the period of this Agreement.
.. :.r 2..
10. City will pay County a sum of money equal to the amount of
accrued sick leave and vacation pay as to all City employees
who will transfer into the employ of County for the purposes
of working said Landfill site. The amount of money to be
paid by City to County shall be computed from the time of
employment of that* particular employee with the City, up to
and including December 3I, 1974. Said payment shall be.
made by City to County within 30 days of the effective date
of this Agreement,
11. County does hereby agree to indemnify and save City free
and harmless from any and all liability for injury or damage':: _
to persons or property in connection with its operation and
use of the property leased by City to County. In this -
connection, County agrees to cause City to be named as an
additional assured on its comprehensive liability insurance
-3-
.a.-- .._...•,,..,.s.>`.k#3 s .. .;, a '....F"F.-=r., K`x,*+WO
"`a
he #
r
^e_G_`i ° a`a"`.,"'�—•-r'... 5%f'>^4+' r^` "`t s `t�` F .ar 4�rnyn: 't s - . x. -
�
policy at no cost to City.
13. County will purchase from City for cash and pay for the
same, within 30 . days after the effective date of this
Agreement, the following items at the following prices:
(a) The Front -End -Loader vehicle
presently used at the said Landfill $1800.00
(b) The diesel fuel tank presently used
at the said Landfill, mounted on a
chassis owned by the County: $ 100.00
(c) The water tank presently used at
the said Landfill: $ 60.00
14. City does hereby transfer and County does hereby accept
title and ownership to the portable office -and the cash box
located within the portable office presently situatedatthe
Landfill and which items were purchased with Landfill
operation funds generated immediately prior to the
execution of this Agreement.
15. This Lease may be modified or the terms waived by mutual
agreement of the parties hereto or their designated agents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, County and City have executed this
Agreement effective as of the 1st day of JANUARY 1975.
Attest:
jtii 1.
City Clerk
CITY 0Fj LODI, a municipal co
Mayor
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a political
on subdivision of the State of California
Attest: Ralph W • Eppers
County Clerk
BY Chairman otYre-Board of Supervisors
D$?y County Clerk
0 t V, I z2wo
J
}c--;LLty :'OUtIty,
_4"
tea.. ,.... —
THIS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS does hereby authorize
the mailing of the attached letter regarding Information
on the Purchase of the Lee Hall Property for Soil Materials
Required at the Existing Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill.
I`HEREBY CERTIFY that the above order was passed and adopted on March 5, 1985
by the following vote of the Board of Supervisors, to wit:
AYES:; BARBER, WILHOIT, CASTLES, SOUSA, COSTA
NOES: NONE
ABSENT NONE 1
ABSTAIN:
NONE i
-
jORETTA J. HAYDE
Copies to COB BOS CAO Clerk of the Board of Supervtsora,•a ,
COB*
o n l r P»h l i n LTnrlr a" County of San_ joaquia t� �''+xF •�,
a •
EVELYN L. COSTA. Ci441RMAN
-=T. CiSTa!rT
DOUGLASS W. %VILHOIT. VICE-CHAIRMAN_
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ;=
• "�"" �`~"'' XILLIAM N SOUSA
222 EAST ':WEBER AVENUE. ROOM 701 = ?5T 7!S[R!CT
STOCKTON. CALIFORNIA 95202
TELEPHONE' 209/944.3113 TGbt W. CASTLES
GEORGE L. BARBER
"U;:TH DISTRICT
MARCH 4, 1985
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
INFORMATION ON THE PURCHASE OF THE LEE HALL PROPERTY
FOR SOIL MATERIALS REQUIRED AT THE EXISTING
HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
Recognizing the concerns of property owners living near the
Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill and the Lee hall property regarding
the potential expansion of the Landfill onto the Hall property,
the Board of Supervisors has directed staff to prepare the
attached documents which present factual information on the
Board's decision to proceed with acquiring the Hall property.
1. Chronology of Events
The first report summarizes all Board action that per-
tains to acquiring the Lee Hall.property. The involve-
ment in this purchase began on September 25, 1984, and
will be finalized only after receipt of additional con-
sultants reports that are due by April 1, 1985. The
important point is that the Board of Supervisors has
required additional independent consultant studies to
answer the concerns raised by citizens that pertain to
drainage, excavation plans, and the feasibility of
extending the life of the existing Harney Lane Landfill
site.
2. Financial Justification
The second report presents a financial analysis on why
the purchase of the Hall property, solely for acquiring
cover material for the existing Landfill site, j s.a
sound financial decision. All suggestions that alter-
native sites are available, at less cost, for acquiring
cover material have been investigated and have been
determined to result in additional cost to the tax-
payers.
'.
.. • yam. .., ;[r R .. : .. 4A
• �!? f' *1..)�.r' 1r i �ti 'T Y.4" 'r-�:�P.SDW#%"LL}s'.%6i�s"..
_
,•,, t"L's x3 ,' t-c,Y-.,sw7?:.:r.'. aY .e,7...-5 r:t"�+AE+�1i±�.ai»g+'rRt�'.. ,+zir ..k -�s'-a.!,'£'. `aa�'re,.
To Whom it May Concern
Information on the Purchase of the
Lee Hall Property for 'Soil Materials
Required at the Existing Harney
Lane Sanitary Landfill r
March 4, 1985
Page Two
We hope the attached information will help allay some of the con-
cerns and fears that -ha- ve been expressed by citizens who live on
Harney Lane. The Board's actions have not been precipitous, but
rather, based on rational reasons and independent consultant stu-
dies to answer the valid concerns raised by citizens and.indivi-
dual Board Members.
As addditional information is received on this subject, we will
attempt to keep the public informed on the findings and conclu-
sions of the consultant's reports.
Very truly yours,
EVELYN COSTA, Chairman _
San Joaquin County -
Board of Supervisors
t �
GEORGE E. BARBER �UGLASS W. WILHOIT�-
Supervisor Supervisor t
_.
WILLIAM 0. SOUSA TOM W. CASTLES
Supervisor Supervisor w
DATE
s
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS CONCERNING
THE PURCHASE OF THE LEE HALL PROPERTY
By Tom Horton - February 19, 1985
EVENT
Sept. 25, 1984 The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors considered
certification of the Environmental Impact Report for the
nrnnnsed Harnpv'Lane Landfill replacement on the Arizcu en
property. The Board of -Supervisors postponed certification
for one_ -_(1) week and directed the Public Works Department to
review ground and surface drainage problems raised by
opponents, and report back to the Board of Supervisors.
Oct. 2, 1984 The Board of Supervisors met to review the Public Works
Department's findings and to consider certifying the
Environmental Impact Report for the Arizcuren.property.
Oct. 23, 1984
Oct. 1984
Nov. 1984
Nov. 1984
SW3-C-LHP1
The Board of Supervisors determined that it did not have
sufficient data to make a decision. The Board of Supervisors
also realized that any delay could create a problem in that
the present landfill would probably close before a replacement
site could be developed. The Board of Supervisors directed
the Public Works Department to develop a plan to prepare
updated financial data for the various alternatives for a
North County disposal site.
Public Works presented a plan of action to the Board of
Supervisors which was adopted. This plan was based on the
realization that any further delays would place the opening
of the proposed landfill beyond the closing date of the
present landfill. Therefore, the plan required development
of an interim disposal plan for the period of time after the
closure of the present site and the opening of a new site.
Hekimian Van Dorpe Associates, the consultant performing.an
update of the County Solid Waste Plan, was selected to
prepare the interim disposal plan, and also, to prepare an
ecomomical analysis of the long term disposal alternatives. _
Tom Horton, County Solid Waste Manager, contacted Lee Hall to
obtain a drainage easement across his property. At that
time, Mr. Hall said that there was extra soil available on
property which he owned, to the south of the landfill. He
offered to sell the property to the County.
New State regulations became effective which substantially
changed the requirements for closing landfills. The current
Harney Lane closure plan became obsolete and could not meet
the new standards. Basically, two (2) additional feet of
cover material is required over the entire site. Also,
surface slopes must be increased from .5% to 3%. Also, a
monitoring program must be developed.
Public Works began negotiating purchase of the Lee Hall Y4
property..
r
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS CONCERNING
THE PURCHASE OF THE LEE HALL PROPERTY
By Tom Horton - February 19, 1985
DATE EVENT
Nov. 13, 1984 Tom Horton met with Ttancy Ostiguy, a staff member of the
California Waste Management Board. Ms. Ostiguy indicated the
following. A permit revision will not be required to place
an additional lift of refuse on County property south of the
labor cAmp since this area is included in the present permit.
Also, the County can place an additional lift over the
present landfill without a permit revision.
Nov. 1984 Public Works contacted the East Bay Municipal Utility
District to obtain requirements for crossing their water
mains.
Nov. 19, 1984 A. J. Tschirky, Senior Real Property Agent, Public Works
Department, appraised the Lee Hall property at $535,000.00.
Dec. 12, 1984 Chet Davisson, Director of the Department of Planning and
Building Inspection, found the proposed excavation of the Lee
Hall property to be in conformance with the applicable
General Plan map and.policies.
Dec. 18, 1984 The Board of Supervi.sors adopted a resolution of intention to
purchase the Lee Hall property for the sum of $535,000.00,
set January 15th as the date to consumate the purchase and
directed the Clerk of the Board to advertise the resolution,
as required in Government Code Sections 25350 and 6063.
Dec. 23, 1984 Notice of the Resolution of Intention to Purchase the Lee >="_
Hall Property was published in the Stockton Record. s !`
Dec. 30, 1984 Second publication of the Resolution in the Stockton Record.f
Jan. 6, 1985
Jan. 15, 1985
Jan. 22, 1985
SW3-C-LHP2
Third publication of the Resolution in the Stockton Record.
The Board of Supervisors held a hearing to discuss purchase
of the Hall property. The Board of Supervisors directed
Public Works to negotiate a condition in the Lee Hall
agreement which would require the.preparation of an approved
drainage plan which would .consider drainage of the project,
surrounding properties, and flooding of the South Paddy Creek.
The Board of Supervisors approved the Agreement for Purschase
of Real Property from Lee Hall, contingent upon the following:
1. County's receipt and approval, within 90 days, of the
Interim Disposal Report by Hekimian Van Dorpe Associates
recommending continuation of landfilling at the existing
Harney Lane Landfill, utilizing offsite material.
x
-2-
CHRONOLOGY OF
EVENTS CONCERNING
THE PURCHASE OF THE LEE HALL PROPERTY
By Tom Horton
- February 19, 1985
TATE
EVENT
2. County's ability to obtain necessary permits, if any,
within 90 days.
3. County's ability to obtain necessary State and local
approvals for purchase of real property within 90 days.
1
4. County's receipt and approval within 90 days of a
-"
drainage plan which adequately addresses all drainage
problems.
Jan. 22, 1985
The Board of Supervisors selected the consulting firm of
=
George S. Nolte and Associates to prepare the drainage plan.
Feb. 12, 1985
The Board of Supervisors authorized an Agreement with George
S. Nolte and Associates to prepare an excavation and drainage
plan for the Lee Hall property and a closure and drainage
plan for the present Harney Lane Landfill. The plan is to be
-'
prepared within 45 days,
March 1, 1985
The interim disposal plan, which is being prepared by Hekisian
-
Van Dorpe Associates, will be due.
.:
April 1, 1985
The Lee Hall property drainage plan will be due. -
April 1, 1985
A draft of the long term disposal alternatives.for North.
Countv Waste, being prepared by Hekimian Van Dorpe,;,
y
Associates, will be due.
x�
S413-C-LtiP3
.�,.
.
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR SOIL MATERIAL
FOR HARNEY LANE SAKTARY LANDFILL
BY TO`! FORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1985
San Joaquin County and the City of Lodi own parcels of land on the south side of
Harney Lane, east of Jack Tone Road, which is used for sanitary landfill
purposes.
On January 2, 1975, the County and the City entered into an agreement whereby
the City leased its property to the County and the County agreed to -operate it
as a sanitary landfill for_ -_use by the City and the County. A supplemental
agreement was entered into on March 19, 1980, whereby the County agreed to
develop a closure plan for the Harney Lane Landfill and to close the site
according to the plan.
Subsequently, a closure plan was prepared which established final elevations
about 20 feet higher than Harney Lane. The top of the landfill was to be very
flat, with slopes of .2X to .3X, and with a two foot thick layer of soil across
the top and on the slides.
About 85% of the landfill has been filled with refuse, and about 50% has been
covered with two feet of final soil. Filling the remaining portion of the
landfill with refuse will last about ten months. At that time, the site will
have achieved its design capacity.
Problems are developing on the closed portion of the site which may have a long
term economic affect. A maior portion of the site was landfilled prior to the
County's purchase of a landfill compactor. Compaction has been very,poor over
most of the site which has caused a considerable amount of settling of the sur—
face, whereby surface water is trapped and ponded. These ponds are in violation
of State permit conditions and create a severe leachate hazard which eventually
could become very costly for the County to correct.
New State Regulations have recently been developed which address these problems.
They require considerably steeper slopes on the surface of landfills and a four
foot thick final cover. In order to meet these new standards, and eliminate
problems created by the current closure plan, a new lift of refuse should be
placed over the entire site, designed to increase the slopes, and allow better
drainage. A four foot thick layer of soil should be placed over the entire
site. Part of this cover should be compacted to minimize the infiltration of
surface water into the landfill.
A major problem with the continued use of the Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill is
the lack of soil for daily and final cover. Presently, there is not enough soil
available at the site to meet the daily cover requirements for the next year's
operation and to complete the four—foot thick layer of final cover.
There is about 105,000 cubic yards of cover material available at Harney Lane.
About 50,000 cubic yards will be required for daily cover through December of
1985, and 345,000 cubic yards will be required to complete the four feet of
final cover to meet the new regulations. Therefore, an additional 300,000 cubic
yards of cover material is needed to close the current operation according to
the new standards.
. ,:-1W'
saj a-`Si+TK: Y� �i
♦y ..i�'1..tr a �'.�r. .. .. ..',Jt1�{j'"/j�!�i,.' J �:��• _
1 K
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR
SOIL MATERIAL FOR HARNEY
LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
TOM HORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 —2—
Use of the landfill could extend beyond November of 1985 by landfilling a por—
tion of the County owned property, south of the labor camp. This is a 13.6 acre
parcel which was used as a County landfill. It is included in the facilities
permit for Harney Lane. Placement of a layer of refuse over this area would not
require a permit revision with the State. Use of this area would extend the
life of the Harney Lane site 1.3 years and would require an additional 140,000
cubic yards of cover material.
If the closure plan were changed to include placing an additional lift of refuse
across the Lodi portion of the site, the life of the site could be extended an
additional 4.3 years and would require 200,000 cubic yards of daily cover.
It should be noted that the quantities of soil required and the projected site
life are estimates which may change after completion of a preliminary closure
plan and excavation plan.
Following is an estimate of site life and cover requirements for present and
extended use.
Landfill Area Life Cover Recuired
Present Area 0.9 Year 300,000 c.y.
South of Labor
Camp 1.3 Years 140,000 c.v.
Extra Lift Over
Present Area 4.3 Years 200,000 c.y.
TOTAL 6.5 years 640,000 c.y.
There are several sources of the needed cover material. Some are as follows:
other construction projects such as the East Stockton Sewer Project, purchasing
and hauling from commercial excavations pits, and excavatioo and hauling from
nearby property.
There will be approximately 100,000 cubic yards of excess .soil from the East
Stockton Sewer Project, primarily from portions of the project served by two
contractors, Schedule D — Vido Artukovich and Sons, and Schedule E — Dalton
Construction Company. Both contractors were contacted and claimed that they had
committed the excess soil to another party. However, both said that they 'would
provide the excess soil to the County if the County had a need for it. The
price quoted for delivering the excess soil to the Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill
varied from $3.85 to $5.00 per yard.
About 50,000 cubic yards of soil from Vido Artukovich and Sons Will be con=
taminated with chunks of bituminous material making it unsuitable for landfill
cover material. Although the bituminous material could be separated from the
soil, the process would be extremely costly. Verne Convey, said that Dalton
Construction Company would have about 50,000 cubic yards of usable material.
Another source of cover material is excavation and hauling from a commercial M
pit. Since there are no commercial pits of sufficient capacity close to the
landfill, transportation costs will be hi h. Costa to utilize an existing
commercial pit may run as high as $10 to 15 per cubic yard. -
/ PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR
SOIL MATERIAL FOR HARtiEY
LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
TOM HORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1935
-3-
A third source of cover material is from nearby property. The elements of costs
are excavating, loading trucks, transporting to the landfill, and stockpiling.
The most economical haul cost would be achieved if all of the material could be
transported and stockpiled over a short period of time. This would require
extra handling of the material after is has been stockpiled. Also, the shorter
the hauling time, the lowei the cost would be.
A parcel of land is available, 21 miles east of the Harney Lane Landfill, which
has sufficient soil on site to meet the Countv's needs. Cost to excavate, load,
transport, stockpile, and rehandle the soil would cost about $4 a cubic yard.
The least costly source of cover material is land adjacent to the landfill. If
soil is obtained from adjacent properties, it can be removed, hauled, and placed
with efficient earth scrapers. Estimated cost to util-ize soil from adjacent
property would be about $1.10 per yard — exclusive of land costs.
A 154 acre parcel located adjacent and to the south of the Harney Lane Landfill
was offered by Lee Hall for Sale to the County for $535,000. There appears to
be sufficient soil available on this property to meet the County's needs. -Top—
soil would be removed, stockpiled, and then replaced after the County has
removed the soil needed for landfilling. This process can be done in such'a
manner that this property can be sold and returned to agricultural purposes:
after the County has removed the soil it needs.
Following, is a cost
analysis of the
various alternatives for
source o: cover
material.
SOURCE OF COVER YLATERIAL
Commercial Pit
Nearby Property
Adjacent-Propertv
Cost per cubic yar3
$10
$4
$1.10
Soil needed to close
3
landfill by December
1485
300,000 c.y.
300,000 c.y.
300,000 c.y.
Cost of Soil
$3,000,000
$1,200,000
$ 330,000
Soil needed to fill
area south of labor
'
camp
140,000 c.y.
140,000 c.y,
140,000 c.y.
X
�.
Cost of Soil
$1,400,000
$ 560,000
$ 154,000
1
Soil needed to place
an additional lift
over Lodi property
200,000 c.y.
200,000 c.y.
200,000 c.y.
Cost of Soil
$2,000,000
$ 800,000
$ 220,000
Cost for total soil
required
$6,400,000
$2,560,000
$ 704,000
• . R+" .�.F... oY•T,. ✓tai.i-... -
_ _: r-Y.:i:.s;y .,l.;et:"ir1�Y,r
,
PURCHASE OF'PROPERTY FOR
SOIL MATERIAL FOR HARNEY
LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
TOM HORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 --
NOTE: The cost of soil from the Eas-t Stockton Sewer Project was not included
because of insufficient quantities and unsuitability of the material.
The cost of utilizing the adjacent property is as follows:
Property purchase $ 535,000
Cost for total soil required 704,000
Construct crossing of EB11UD 10,000
Total project cost $ 1,249,000
Total project cost per cubic yard - $1.95
When the property is sold, the proceeds would reduce the total project cost.
There are some problems to to resolved with the utilization of the Lee Hall pro-
perty. A. drainage and excavation plan mist be prepared which considers the,
r
drainage of the surrounding properties, the capacity of South Paddy Creek; and
the requirements of East Ray Municipal Utility District for crossing and
_
excavating close to their waterlines, and the requirements of the Pacific Gas
Y.
and Electric Company for excavation close to'theirtowers. Also, a closure plan,
must be prepared for the Harney Lane Landfill which establishes final elevations_
and drainage patterns.
xca
George S. Nolte and Associates has been hired to prepare the drainage and exca-
vation plan and to prepare a preliminary closure plan which address these
vation
f
-problems. The process will involve consulting with the East Bay.Municipa1
43,
Utility District and Pacific Gas and Electric Company to address any conditions-`
�
or concerns posed by the excavation project. When these plans are prepared, a
xr
"complete cost estimate can be developed.
SW3-REP 1
_
1
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND
�f
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN FOR THE PURCHASE OF
2
REAL PROPERTY AT THE HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
3
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
4
, 1985, by and between the County of San Joaquin, a
5
political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred
6
to -s "COUI-M", and the City of Lodi, a municipal corporation,
7
hereinafter referred to as "CITY".
'
8
W I T N E S S E T H:
9
WHEREAS, CITY owns real property on the south side of Harney
10
Lane, west of Tully Road, more particularly described as that property
11
delineated on Exhibit A, a copy of which is attached and by this
12
reference incorporated herein, which is presently being leased by
13
COUNTY for use as a sanitary landfill; and,
,-
14
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin County Solid Waste M,3nagement.Plan calls
15
for a cooperative effort by COUNTY and the Cities of the County of. San
16
Joaquin for the management of solid waste within the COUNTY; and,
17
WHEREAS, by agreement dated January 2, 1975 entitled "AGREEMENT
18
REGARDING HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL", hereinafter referred to as
19
AGREEMENT I, and by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entitled
20
"SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT", hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT II,
_
21
COUNTY has operated a sanitary Landfill on the real property described
=
22
in Exhibit A; and
=:
23
WHEREAS, by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entitled "AGREEMENT
24
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN RELATING TO
25
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT" hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT III,
=
26
COUNTY agreed to provide adequate disposal facilities for CITY in the
27
North County area; and,
rs
o-
l_
.�
1
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to extend the life of the landfill opera= �
2
tion by placing
additional refuse on the herein described property;
3
and,
4
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to purchase the herein described property
5
from CITY
for continued landfill use, and CITY desires to sell said
6
property
to COUNTY;
7
NOW,
THEREFORE, CITY and COUNTY agree as follows:
8
1.
CITY shall execute and deliver to COUNTY a good and suf—
9
ficient Grant Deed for the property described in exhibit A,
10
attached.
11
2.
COUNTY shall pay CITY the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) as the
12
total purchase price for said property within thirty (30)
13
days after the approval and execution of this agreement by
14
the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors.
15
3.
Title to the herein described property shall vest in the
16
County of San Joaquin, free and clear of all liens,
17
encumbrances, assessments, easements, leases and taxes,
18
except those of record provided they do not adversely affect
19
the continued use of this property as a sanitary landfill.
20
4.
Personal property included in this sale shall include all
21
personal property owned by CITY that is situated upon the
22
herein described real property and as further described-in
23
Clause 1. of AGREEMENT I.
24
5.
COUNTY shall pay recording costs and title and escrow fees,
25
if any.
26
6.
CITY and COUNTY agree that the terms and conditions herein
.1
expressed shall supersede AGREEMENT I and AGREEMENT II and
that those agreements shall be considered terminated upon
2
the approval and execution of this document by the San
3
Joaquin County Board of Supervisors.
4
7.
CITY and COUNTY agree that terms and conditions set forth in
5
AGREEMENT III shall remain in full force.
6
8.
CITY and COUNTY each agree to hold each other harmless from
7
their own past actions with respect to the ownership, opera -
8
tion, and maintenance of a sanitary landfill on the herein
9
described real property.
10
9.
The parties hereto mutually agree that they have set forth
�.
11
the whole of their agreement, and that the performance of
12
the terms and conditions set forth herein shall relieve
13
COUNTY and CITY of all further obligations or consideraton
14
for the execution and delivery of a Grant Deed to the herein
15
described property.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
/////
I hereby certify that Resolution Noo.85-42
was passed and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting
held April 3, 1985 by the following votes
Ayes: Council Members - Pinkerton, Hinchman,
Olson, Reid, and
Snider (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Alice M Reimche
City Clerk
85-42
z;=
RESOLUTION NO. 85-42
RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI
AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN FOR THE PURCHASE OF REAL
PROPERTY AT THE HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lodi
does
hereby
approved the Agreement between the City of Lodi and
the
County
of San Joaquin .for the purchase of real property at
the
Harney
Lane Sanitary Landfill, a.copy of which is attached hereto,
marked
Exhibit "A", and therebv made a part hereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk
are
hereby
authorized to execute the subject agreemen� on behalf of
the
City.
Dated:
April 3, 1985
I hereby certify that Resolution Noo.85-42
was passed and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting
held April 3, 1985 by the following votes
Ayes: Council Members - Pinkerton, Hinchman,
Olson, Reid, and
Snider (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Alice M Reimche
City Clerk
85-42
y'� r
1
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN FOR THE PURCHASE OF
2
REAL PROPERTY AT THE HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
3
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
4
, 1985, by and between the County of San Joaquin, a
5
political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred
6
to as "COUNTY", and the City of Lodi, a municipal corporation, -
7
hereinafter referred to as "CITY".
8
W IT N E S S E T H:
9
WHEREAS, CITY owns real property on the south side of Harney
10
Lane, west of Tully Road, more particularly described as that property
11
delineated on Exhibit A, a copy of which is attached and by this
12
reference incorporated herein, which is presently being leased by
13
COUNTY for use as a sanitary landfill; and,
14
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin County Solid Waste Management Plan calls
15
for a cooperative effort by COUNTY and the Cities of the County of San
16
Joaquin for the management of solid waste within the COUNTY; and,
17
WHEREAS, by agreement dated January 2, 1975 entitled "AGREEMENT
18
REGARDING HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL", hereinafter referred to as
19
AGREEMENT I, and by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entitled
20
"SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT", hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT II,
21
COUNTY has operated a sanitary landfill on the real property described
22
in Exhibit A; and
23
WHEREAS, by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entitled "AGREEMENT
24
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN RELATING TO
25
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT" hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT III,
26
COUNTY agreed to provide adequate disposal facilities for CITY in the
27
North County area; and,
at
f r__ -
1
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to extend the life of the landfill opera -
2
tion
by placing additional refuse on the herein described property;
3
and,
4
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to purchase the herein described property
5
from
CITY
for continued landfill use, and CITY desires to sell said
6
property
to COUNTY;
7
NOW,
THEREFORE, CITY and COUNTY agree as follows:
8
1.
CITY shall execute and deliver to COUNTY a good and suf—
9
ficient Grant Deed for the property described in exhibit A,
10
attached.
11
2.
COUNTY shall pay CITY the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) as the
12
total purchase price for said property within thirty (30)
13
days after the approval and execution of this agreement by
14
the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors.
15
3.
Title to the herein described property shall vest in the
16
County of San Joaquin, free and clear of all liens,
17
encumbrances, assessments, easements, leases and taxes,
18
except those of record provided they -do not adversely affect
19
the continued use of this property as a sanitary landfill.
20
4.
Personal property included in this sale shall include all
21
personal property owned by CITY that is situated upon the
22
herein described real property and as further described in
23
Clause 1. of AGREEMENT I.
24
5.
COUNTY shall pay recording costs and title and escrow fees, -
25
if any.
26
6.
CITY and COUNTY agree that the terms and conditions herein
27
expressed shall supersede AGREEMENT I and AGREEMENT II and
{
_ _ _.
. �M, _ , M
1
that those agreements shall be considered terminated upon x
2
the approval and execution of this document by the San
3
Joaquin County Board of Supervisors.
•'-
4
7.
CITY and COUNTY agree that terms and conditions set forth in
_5
AGREEMENT III shall remain in full force.
_
6
8.
CITY and COUNTY each agree to hold each other harmless from
7
their own past actions with respect to the ownership, opera -
8
tion, and maintenance of a sanitary landfill on the herein
9
described real property.
10
9.
The parties hereto mutually agree that they have set forth
11
the whole of their agreement, and that the performance of
12
the terms and conditions set forth herein shall relieve
13
COUNTY and CITY of all further obligations or consideraton
14
for the execution and delivery of a Grant Deed to the herein
15
described property.
F .fY
-
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-- u
27
'
';
' . _. ,• .
.,'Y 'fir =
"� ,_- ..
15 ByT j.V-9 R. DERMOB ��
Deputy County Counsel
16
APPROUD AS TO FORM:
17
By
18 RONALD STEIN
Lodi City Attorney
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have executed this
l
--2
agreement on the day and year
first above written.
x
3
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a
_
political subdivision of
4
the State of California
ATTEST: JORETTA J. HAYDE
5
Clerk of the Board of Super-
visors of the County of San
By.
6
Joaquin, State of California
EVELYN L. COSTA, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
7
_-
Bye _. ..
(SEAL)
8
Deputy Clerk
9
ATTEST:
CITY OF LODI, a municipp?
corporation of the State
10
of California
11
B
Clerk, City of Lodi
12
RANDY SNIDER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
13
14
JOHN F. CHEADLE
Count Counsel
I _ / w 174 ///%�
15 ByT j.V-9 R. DERMOB ��
Deputy County Counsel
16
APPROUD AS TO FORM:
17
By
18 RONALD STEIN
Lodi City Attorney
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4FF'J
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI,
CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO.'81-117
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO SAN JOA9i;IN
COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin County Solid Waste Policy
Committee has recommended the amendment of the San Joaquin
County Solid Waste Management Plan by the deletion of the
requirement that the search for a new Central County landfill
site be confined to an area within a ten mile radius of the
Lovelace Transfer Station;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Council hereby
approves an amendment to the San Joaquin County Solid Waste
Management Plan which would delete the fourth full paragraph
of the section entitled "Recommendations for Central County",
found at page 10-9 of the San Joaquin County Solid Waste Manage-
ment Plan, which paragraph reads as follows:
"The search for the new site should
initially be in an area within approximately a
10 mile radius of the Lovelace Transfer Station
in accordance with the constraints shown in
Figure 8-4 and listed in Table 10-1."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Council finds that:
(a) this amendment will not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, :substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self .sustain levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or.
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory;
(b) this amendment will not have the potential to
achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of
long-term environmental goals;
(c) this amendment will not have possible environmental
effects which are individually limited but cumulatively consider-
able. "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed r
in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects;
-r
r r�r,tis
81-117
CITY OF LODI AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
RELATING TO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
19 , by and between the COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN,
a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter
"COUNTY", and the CITY OF LODI, a municipal corporation of the State
of California, hereinafter "CITY".
WHEREAS, -The San Joaquin County Solid Waste Management Plan
calls for a cooperative effort by the County of San Joaquin and the
Cities of the County of San Joaquin for the management of solid -
wastes existing within the County;
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and COUNTY agree as follows:
1. . COUNTY shall be responsible for providing a solid waste
disposal facility or facilities in the north County area_to serve
residences and businesses in the north County incorporated and
unincorporated areas. Adequate solid waste disposal or trans-
portation facilities such as a disposal site and/or a transfer
station will be established by COUNTY within a reasonable proximity
to CITY in order to serve the need to dispose of solid waste
generated within CITY'S corporate limits.
2. CITY shall not be required to participate initially in
the capital financing of the facilities referred to in paragraph 1
Q71
3. COUNTY intends to recover its capital and operating costs
for each COUNTY refuse disposal site through charges to users of
each such site.
4. The charges for use shall be the same for all north
County users whether from the incorporated cr unincorporated areas. -
The charges may be adjusted as necessary in order to cover capital
and operating costs of the facilities.
5. Refuse collectors franchised by CITY who use COUNTY pro-
vided facilities shall pay for disposal -services at the rates es-
tablished by COUNTY. At the option of CITY, these payments may be.
completely or partial -.y paid by City.
6. COUNTY will review its plans regarding the location of
such facilities with CITY and CITY shall assist COUNTY in defining
and obtaining a desirable location for such facilities.
7. In recognition of COUNTY'S responsibility to fully .finance•
the development and operation of "such facilities, COUNTY retains
the exclusive right to establish terms and conditions of operation
of the facilities, including rates to be charged.
8. CITY retains the right to regulate the collection and
transportation of all solid waste materials within the corporate
limits of CITY.
9. As long as the existing Harney Lane.Landfill is -used for
the disposal of*refuse collected within CITY, CITY and COUNTY shall
continue to utilize the existing agreement for the operation of the
Harney Lane Landfill effective January 1, 1975, between CITY and COUNTY.::
10. This Agreement shall continue in effect unless voided by .
State action, except that either party may terminate the Agreement = _
by giving four years written notice of its intention to terminate F.,p
2 -� _
to the other party:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this = Y
Agreement this day of 1980.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GERALD A. SHERWIN
County Counsel
By
TERRENCE R. DERMODY
Deputy County Counsel
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RONALD STEIN
Lodi City Attorney
By
Title
3 -
February 21, 1985
Ut
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
DEPARTMENT: OF PUBLIC WORKS
R O. BOX 1810 1810 E. HAZELTON AVENUE
STOCKTON. CALIFORNIA 95201
(209) 944-2281
Henry A. Glaves, Jr.
City Manager
City of Lodi
221 West Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF HARNEY LANE LANDFILL PROPEPTY
BY THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
Dear Mr. Glaves:
i :..'.4-0 Pr— 9. DELLUCCHI
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ,
U EZ .
7.� EPUT rAEC7��7��ppTOR
L tC
Attached is a draft of a proposed agreement for purchase of the City of
Lodi owned portion of the Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill by the County of
San Joaquin. It is being afforded for your review and comments.
This agreement has not yet been reviewed by County Counsel; therefore,
please return the agreement with your comments and we will prepare and submit
a draft for their review.
In the event,you have any questions or problems concerning this agreement,
HENRY M.vHIRATA---
Director of. Public Works
HM : TEH : to
Attachment
David D. Rowlands,
County Administratc
c:
H-&�,
s
_ � •mac}
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN FOR THE PURCHASE OF
2 REAL PROPERTY AT THE HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
3 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
4 , 1985, by and between the County of San Joaquin, a
5 political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred
6 to as "COUNTY", and the City of Lodi, a municipal corporation,
7 hereinafter re.erred to as "CITY".
8 W I T N E S S E T H:
9 WHEREAS, CITY owns real property on the south side of Harney
10 Lane, west of Tully Road, more particularly described as that property
11 delineated on Exhibit A, a copy of which is attached and by this
12 reference incorporated herein, which is presently being leased by
13 COUNTY for use as a sanitary landfill; and,
14 WHEREAS, the San Joaquin County Solid Waste Management Plan calls
15 for a cooperative effort by COUNTY and the Cities of the County of San
16 Joaquin for the management of Pzlid waste within the COUNTY; and,
17 WHEREAS, by agreement dated January 2, 1975 entitled "AGREEMENT
18 REGARDING HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL", hereinafter referred to as
19 AGREEMENT I, and by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entitled _
20 "SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT", hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT II,
21 COUNTY has operated a sanitary landfill on the real property described
22 in Exhibit A; and
23 WHEREAS, by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entit:ed "AGREEMENT
24 BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN RELATING TO
25 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT" hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT III,
26 COUNTY agreed to provide adequate disposal facilities for CITY in the
27 North County area; and,
-1-
=sem'
1
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to extend the life of the landfill opera -
2
tion by placing additional refuse on the herein described.property;
3
and,
4
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to purchase the herein described property
5
from CITY.for continued landfill use, and CITY desires to sell said
_ 6
property to COUNTY;
7
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and COUNTY agree as follows:
8
1. CITY shall execute and deliver to COUNTY a good -,.and suf-
9
ficient Grant Deed for the property described in exhibit A.
10
attached.
11
2. COUNTY shall pay CITY the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) as the
12
total purchase price for said property within thirty (30)
13
days after the approval and execution of this agreement by
14
the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors.
15
3. Title to the herein described property shall vest in the
16
County of San Joaquin, free and clear of all liens,
17
encumbrances, assessments, easements, leases and taxes,
18
except those of record provided they do not adversely affect -
19
the continued use of this property as a sanitary landfill.
20
4. Personal property included in this sale shall include all
21
personal property owned by CITY that is situated upon the
22
herein described real property and as further described in `
23
Clause 1. of AGREEMENT I.
24
5. COUNTY shall pay recording costs and title and escrow fees,
25
if any.
26
6. CITY and COUNTY agree that the terms and conditions herein.
27
expressed shall supersede AGREEMENT I and AGREEMENT II and
-2-
AIMIL
1 that those agreements shall be considered null and void upon
2 the approval and execution of this document by.the San
3 Joaquin County Board of Sunervisors.
4 7. CITY and COUNTY agree that terms and conditions set forth in
5 AGREEMENT III shall remain in full force and effect except
6 for Clause 9 which shall be deleted and considered null -and
7 void.
8 S. CITY and COUNTY each agree to hold each other harmless from
9 their own past actions with respect to the ownership, opera-
10 tion, and maintenance of a sanitary landfill on the herein
11 described real property.
12
13
14
15
16
17
1s
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
9. The parties hereto mutually agree that they have set forth
the whole of their agreement, and that the performance of
the terms and conditions set forth herein shall relieve
COUNTY and CITY of all further obligations or consideraton
for the execution and delivery of a Grant Deed to the herein
described property.
_3_
1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the.parties
hereto have executed'this`.
2
agreement on the day and year
first above written.
3
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a
political subdivision of
4
the State of California
ATTEST: JORETTA J. HAYDE
5
Clerk of the Board of Super-
visors of the County of San
By
6
Joaquin, State of California
EVELYN L. COSTA, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
7
By (SEAL)
8
Deputy Clerk
9
ATTEST:
CITY OF LODI, a municipal
corporation of the State
10
of California
11
Clerk, City of Lodi
By
12
RANDY SNIDER, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
13
JOHN F. CHEADLE
County Counsel
14
15
By
TERRENCE R. DERMODY
16
Deputy County Counsel
17
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1$
By
19
RONALD STEIN
Lodi City Attorney
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
RAPID LETTER
FROM
e0000
• ter- .
�rw/44 DATE
• er�r1 �r
wl r
SIGNED
REPLY DATE
VIM' wav
0. ' Eta
FEB
OF LODI,
DEPARTMENT
SIGNED
TOPS NO. 3701
LITHO - USA RECIPIENT: REPLY ON PINK COPY — RETAIN WHITE COPY
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN FOR THE PURCHASE OF
2 REAL PROPERTY AT THE HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
3 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
4 , 1985, by and between the County of San Joaquin, a
5 political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred
6
to as "COUNTY", and the City of Lodi, a municipal corporation,
7
hereinafter referred to as "CITY".
8
W I T N E S S E T H•
9
WHEREAS, CITY owns real property on the south side of Barney
10
Lane, west of Tully Road, more particularly described as that property
11
delineated on Exhibit A, a copy of which is attached and by this
12
reference incorporated herein, which is presently being leased by
13
COUNTY for use as a sanitary landfill; and,
14
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin County Solid Waste Management Plan calls
15
for a cooperative effort by COUNTY and the Cities of the County of San
16
3oaquin for the management of solid waste within the COUNTY; and,
17
WHEREAS, by agreement dated January 2, 1975 entitled "AGREEMENT
18
REGARDING HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL", hereinafter referred to as
19
AGREEMENT I, and by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entitled
20
"SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT", hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT II,
21
COUNTY has operated a sanitary landfill on the real property described
22
in Exhibit A; and
23
WHEREAS, by agreement dated March 19, 1980 entitled "AGREEMENT
24
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LODI AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN RELATING TO
25
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT" hereinafter referred to as AGREEMENT III,
26
COUNTY agreed to provide adequate disposal facilities for CITY in the
27
North County area; and,
-1-
uu
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to extend the life of the landfill opera-
tion by placing additional refuse on the herein described property;
and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY desires to purchase the herein described property
from CITY for continued landfill use, and CITY desires to sell said
property to COUNTY;
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and COUNTY agree as follows:
1. CITY shall execute and deliver to COUNTY a good and suf-
ficient Grant Deed for the property described in exhibit A,
attached.
2. COUNTY shall pay CITY the sum of ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) as the
total purchase price for said property within thirty (30)
days after the approval and execution of this agreement by
the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors.
3. Title to the herein described property shall vest in the
County of San Joaquin, free and clear of all liens,
y=^..:. -, j L
encumbrances, assessments, easements leases and taxes,
except those of record provided they do not adversely affect
the continued use of this property as a sanitary landfill.
4. Personal property included in this sale shall include all
personal property owned by CITY that is situated upon the
herein described real property and as further described in
Clause 1. of AGREEMENT I.
5. COUNTY shall pay recording costs and title and escrow fees,
if any.
6. CITY and COUNTY agree that the terms and conditions herein
expressed shall supersede AGREEMENT I and AGREEMENT II and
-2-
1
-_ 2
- 1
3 .
4
5
6
-
7
8
9
10
11
12
-
13
14
15
--
�K� A
16
_
17
18
19
20
21
1111/
22
/1111
23
24
l`-
25
that those agreements shall be considered null and. void upon
- 1
the approval and execution of this document by the San
Joaquin County Board of Supervisors.
-
7. CITY and COUNTY agree that terms and conditions set forth in
AGREEMENT III shall remain in full force and effect except
for Clause 9 which shall be deleted and considered null and
void.
8. CITY and COUNTY each agree to hold each other 'harmless from
-
their own past actions with respect to the ownership, opera-
tion, and maintenance of a sanitary landfill on the herein
described real property.
--
�K� A
9. The parties hereto mutually agree that they have set forth
_
the whole of their agreement, and that the.performance of
the terms and conditions set forth herein shall relieve
COUNTY and CITY of all further obligations or consideraton:
for the execution and delivery of a Grant Deed to the herein'
described property.
l`-
f°
1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
2 agreement on the day and year first above written.
3 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a
political subdivision of
4 the State of California
ATTEST: JORETTA J. HAYDE
5 Clerk of the Board of Super-
visors of the County of San
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Joaquin, State of California
By (SEAL)
Deputy Clerk
ATTEST:
Clerk, City of Lodi
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
JOHN F. CHEADLE
County Counsel
By
TERRENCE R. DERMODY
Deputy County Counsel
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
RONALD STEIN
Lodi City Attorney
By
EVELYN L., COSTA,_ Chairman
Board of Supervisors
CITY OF LODI, a municipal
corporation of the State
of California
By
RANDY SNIDER, Mayor
-4-
RP5-AC-CL
Before the Board of Supervisors w
County of San Joaquin, State of California
B- 85-360
MOTION: WILHOIT/CASTLES
AUTHORIZATION OF MAILING
RE: HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
THIS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS does hereby authorize
the mailing of the attached letter regarding Information
on the Purchase of the Lee Hall Property for Soil Materials
Required at the Existing Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill.
.A
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the, above order was passed and adopted on March 5 1985
by the following vote of the Board of Supervisors, to wit: =.
AYES: BARBER, WILHOIT, CASTLES, SOUSA, COSTA
NOES: NONE
4
i
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE ; .t#� t
JORETTA J. HAYDES;,
Copies to: COB BOS CAO Clerk of the Board of SupergI
Counsel, 'Public Works County of San':joa4a46
Leland Hall State of Califomta 4
30RMA 1. wa►YDe F
COB 12 (8/84)
Sd'" yX1
✓:' �.
- E'JELYN L. COSTA. CH4tR><✓'AN
=T" MSTPICT
DOUGLASS W. WILHOIT. VI('E-CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS pNDC;ISraICT
• _
WILLIAM N. SOUSA
.. _: a... 222 EAST WEBER AVENUE. ROOM 701 =I -)ST CISTRICT _
STOCKTON. CALIFORNIA 95202
TELEPHONE: 209/944-3113 TORI W. CASTLES
a^ DIST=ICT
GEORGE L. BARBER
= -,L LATH DISTRICT - -
MARCH 4, 1985
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
INFORMATION ON THE PURCHASE OF THE LEE HALL PROPERTY
FOR SOIL MATERIALS REQUIRED AT THE EXISTING
HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
Recognizing the concerns or property owners living near the
Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill and the Lee Hall property regarding
the potential expansion of the Landfill onto the Hall property,
the Board of Supervisors has directed staff to prepare the
attached documents which present factual information on the
Board's decision to proceed with acquiring the Hall property.
1. Chronology of Events
The first report summarizes all Board action that -per-
tains to acquiring the Lee Hall property. The involve-
ment in this purchase began on September 25, 1984, and
will be finalized only after receipt of additional con-
sultants reports that are due by April 1,_1985. The
important point is that the Board of Supervisors has
required additional independent consultant studies to
answer the concerns raised by citizens that pertain to
drainage, excavation plans, and the feasibility of.
extending the life of the existing Harney Lane Landfill
site. _
2. Financial Justification
The second report presents a Financial analysis on why;:
the purchase of the Hall property, solely for acquiring
cover material for the existing Landfill site, is a t
sound financial decision. All suggestions that alter-
native sites are available, at less cast, for acquiring
cover material have been investigated and have been
determined to result in additional cost to•the tax-
payers.
g'F
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS CONCERNING
THE PURCHASE OF THE LEE HALL PROPERTY
By Tom Horton - February 19, 1985
DATE EVENT
Sept. 25, 1984 The San Joaquin Countv Board of Supervisors considered
certification of the Environmental Impact Report for the
nrnpnaed Harnav Lane Landfill replacement on the Arizcuren
property. The Board of Supervisors postponed certification
for on -&-(I) week and directed the Public Works Department to
review ground and surface drainage problems raised by
opponents, and report back to the Board of Supervisors.
Oct. 2, 1984 The Board of Supervisors met to review the Public Works
Department's findings and to consider certifying the
Environmental Impact Report for the Arizcuren property.
The Board of Supervisors determined that it did not have
sufficient data to make a decision. The Board of Supervisors
also realized that any delay could create a problem in that
the present landfill would probably close before a replacement
site could be developed. The Board of Supervisors directed
the Public -Works Department to develop a plan to prepare
updated financial data for the various alternatives for a
North County disposal site.
Oct. 23, 1984 Public Works presented a plan of action to the Board of
Supervisors which was adopted. This plan was based on the
realization that any further delays would place the opening
of the proposed landfill beyond the closing date of the
present landfill. Therefore, the plan required development
of an interim disposal plan for the period of time after the
closure of the present site and the opening of a new site.
Hekimian Van Dorpe Associates, the consultant performing ,an
update of the County Solid Waste Plan, was selected to
prepare the interim disposal plan, and also, to prepare an
ecomomical analysis of the long term disposal alternatives.
Oct. 1984 Tom Horton, County Solid Waste Manager, contacted Lee Hall to
obtain a drainage easement across his property. At that
time, Mr. Hall said that there was extra soil available on
property which he owned, to the south of the landfill. He
offered to sell the property to the County.
Nov. 1984 New State regulations became effective which substantially
changed the requirements for closing landfills. The current
Harney Lane closure pian became obsolete and could not meet
the naw standards. Basically, two (2) additional feet of
cover material is required over the entire site. Also,
surface slopes must be increased from .5% to 3%. Also, a
monitoring program must be developed.
Nov. 1984 Public Works began negotiating purchase of the Lee Hall r-
property.
SW3-C-LHP1
_.i c �.n._
DATE
Jan. 22, 1985
Feb. 12, 1985
March 1, 1985
April 1, 1985
April 1, 1935
SW3-C-LHP3
EVENT
2. County's ability to obtain necessary permits, if any,
within 90 days.
3. County's ability to obtain necessary State and local
approvals for purchase of -real property within 90 days"
4. County's receipt and approval within 90 days of a
drainage plan which adequately addresses all drainage
problems.
The Board of Supervisors selected the consulting firm of
George S. Nolte and Associates to prepare the drainage plan.
The Board of Supervisors authorized an Agreement with George
S. Nolte and Associates to prepare an excavation and drainage -_
plan for the Lee Hall property and a closure and drainage -
plan for the present Harney Lane Landfill. The plan is to be"-`'
prepared within 45 days.
The interim disposal plan, which is being prepared by Hekimian
Van Dorpe Associates, will be due.
The Lee Hall property drainage plan will be due.
A draft of the long term disposal alternatives for North
County Waste, being prepared by Hekimian Van Dorpe
Associates, will be due.
t
-3_
h w' az e''3 rix. t
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR SOIL MATERIAL
FOR HARNEY LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
BY TOTS HORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1985
San Joaquin County and the City of Lodi own parcels of land on the south side of
Harney Lane, east of Jack Tone Road, which is used for sanitary landfill
purposes.
On January 2, 1975, the County and the City entered into an agreement whereby
the City leased its property to the County and the County agreed to operate it
as a sanitary landfill for._use by the City and the County. A supplemental
agreement was entered into on March 19, 1980, whereby the County agreed to
develop a closure plan for the Harney Lane Landfill and to close the site
according to the plan.
Subsequently, a closure plan was prepared which established final elevations
about 20 feet higher than Harney Lane. The top of the landfill was to be very
flat, with slopes of .2% to .3%, and with a two foot thick layer of soil across
the top and on the slides.
About 85% of the landfill has been filled With refuse, and about 50% has been
covered with two feet of final soil. Filling the remaining portion of the
landfill with refuse will last about ten months. At that time, the site will
have achieved its design capacity.
Problems are developing on the closed portion of the site which may have a long
term economic affect. A major portion of the site was landfilled prior to the
County's purchase of a landfill compactor. Compaction has been very poor over
most of the site which has caused a considerable amount of settling of the sur-
face, whereby surface water is trapped and ponded. These ponds are in violation
of State permit conditions and create a severe leachate hazard which eventually
could become very costly for the County to correct.
New State Regulations have recently been developed which address these problems..
They require considerably steeper slopes on the surface of landfills and a f our
foot thick final cover. In order to meet these new standards, and eliminate
problems created by the current closure plan_ a new lift of refuse should be
placed over the entire site, designed to increase the slopes, and allow better
drainage. A four foot thick layer of soil should be placed over the entire
site. Part of this cover should be compacted to minimize the infiltration of
surface water into the landfill.
A major problem with the continued use of the Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill is
the lack of soil for daily and final cover. Presently, there is not enough soil
available at the site to meet the daily cover requirements' for the next year's
operation and to complete the four -foot thick layer of final cover.
There is about 105,000 cubic yards of cover material available at Harney.Lane.
About 50,000 cubic yards will be required for daily cover through, December of
1985, and 345,000 cubic yards will be required to complete the four feet of
final cover to meet the new regulations. Therefore, an additional 300,000 cubic
yards of cover material is needed to close the current operation according to`
the new standards.:
f1mN
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR
SOIL MATERIAL FOR HARNEY
LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
TOM HORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 -2-
Use of the landfill could extend beyond November of 1985 by landfilling a por-
tion of the County owned property, south of the labor camp. This is a 13.6 acre
parcel which was used as a County landfill. It is included in the facilities
permit for Harney Lane. Placement of a layer of refuse over this area would not
require a permit revision with the State. Use of this area would extend the
life of the Harney Lane site 1.3 years and would require an additional 140,000 _
cubic yards of cover material.
If the closure plan were changed to include placing an additional lift of refuse
across the Lodi portion of the site, the life of the site could be extended an
additional 4.3 years and would require 200,000 cubic yards of daily cover.
It should be noted that the quantities of soil required and the projected site
life are estimates which may change after completion of a preliminary closure
plan and excavation plan.
Following is an estimate of site life and cover requirements for present and
extended use.
Landfill Area Life Cover Required
Present Area 0.9 Year 300,000 c.y.
South of Labor
Camp 1.3 Years 140,000 c.y.
Extra Lift Over
Present Area 4.3 Years 200,000 c.v.
TOTAL 6.5 years 640,000 c.y.
There are several sources of the needed cover material. Some are as follows:
other construction projects such as the East Stockton Sewer Project, purchasing
and hauling from commercial excavations pits, and excavation and hauling from
nearby property.
There will be approximately 200,000 cubic yards of excess soil from the East
Stockton Sewer Project, primarily from portions of the project served by two
contractors, Schedule D - Vido Artukovich and Sons, and Schedule E - Dalton
Construction Company, Both contractors were contacted and claimed that they had
committed the excess soil to another party. However, both said that they would
provide the excess soil to the County if the County had a need for it. The
price quoted for delivering the excess soil to the Harney Lane Sanitary Landfill
varied from $3.85 to $5.00 per yard.
About 50,000 cubic yards of soil from Vido Artukovich and Sons will be con-
taminated with chunks of bituminous material making it unsuitable for landfill
cover material. Although the bituminous material could be separated from the
soil, the process would be extremely costly. Verne Convey, said that Dalton
Construction Company would have about 50,000 cubic yards of usable material.
Another source of cover material is excavation and hauling from a commercial ,
pit. Since there are no commercial pits of sufficient capacity close to the , �=
landfill, transportation costs will be hih. Costs to utilize an existing-
commercial
xisting commercial pit may run as high as $1G to, B per cubic yard.
,...1" �
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR
SOIL MATERIAL FOR HARNEY
LANE SANITARY LANDFILL
-
TOM HORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 -3-
A third source of cover material is from nearby property. The elements of costs
z,
are excavating, loading trucks, transporting to the landfill, and stockpiling.
The most economical haul cost would be achieved if all of the material could be
transported and stockpiled over a short period of time. This would require
extra hardlir_g of the material after is has been stockpiled. Also, the shorter
-
the hauling time, the lower the cost would be.
A parcel of land is available, 21 miles east of the Harney Lane Landfill, which
has sufficient soil on site to meet the Countv's needs. Cost to excavate, load,
transport, stockpile, and rehandle the soil would cost about $4 a cubic yard.;
The least costly source of cover material is land adjacent to the landfill. If
soil is obtained from adjacent properties, it can be removed, hauled, and placed
-
with efficient earth scrapers. Estimated cost to utilize soil from adjacent
property would be about $1.10 per yard - exclusive of land costs.
_•
z
A 154 acre parcel located adjacent and to the south of the Harney Lane Landfill
€
was offered by Lee Hall for Sale to the County for $535,000. There appears to.
be sufficient soil available on this property to meet the Countv's needs. Top-
E.
soil would be removed, stockpiled, and then replaced after the County has.-.''
removed the soil needed for landfilling. This process can be done in such,a
manner that this property can be sold and returned to agricultural purposes
after the County has removed the soil it needs.
r -
Following, is a cost analysis of the various alternatives for source of cover
material.
F
SOURCE OF COVER MATERIAL
Commercial Pit Nearby Property AdjacentProperty
Cost per cubic yard $10 $4 $1.10
Soil needed to close
landfill by December
1985 300,000 c.y. 300,000 c.y. 300,000 c.y.
Cost of Soil $3,000,000 - $1,200,000 $ 3301000
Soil needed to fill
area south of labor
camp 140,000 c.y. 140,000 c.y. 140,000 c.y.
Cost of Soil $1,400,000 $ 560,000 $ 154,000
Soil needed to place
an additional lift
over Lodi property 200,000 c.y. 200,000 c.y. 200,000 c.y.
Cost of Soil $2,000,000 $ 800,000-'
$ 220,000
Cost for total soil
.required
$6,400,000 $2,560,000 $ 704,QQQ;,
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR
SOIL MATERIAL FOR HARNEY
LANE SANITARYLANDFILL
TOM HORTON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 -4-
NOTE: The cost of soil from the East Stockton Sewer Project was not included
because of insufficient quantities and unsuitability of the material.
The cost of utilizing the adjacent property is as follows:
Property purchase $ 535,000
Cost for total soil required 704,000
Construct crossing of EBMUD 10,000
Total project cost $ 1,249,000
Total project cost per cubic yard - $1.95
When the property is sold, the proceeds would reduce the total project cost.
There are some problems to be resolved with the utilization of the Lee.Hall.pro- .
perty. A drainage and excavation plan must be prepared which considers. the
drainage of the surrounding properties, the capacity of South Paddy Creek, Arid
the requirements of East Bay Municipal Utility District for crossing and
excavating close to their waterlines, and the requirements of the Pacific Gas
and Electric Company for excavation close to their towers. also, a closure plan
must be prepared for the Harney Lane Landfill which establishes final elevations
and drainage patterns.
George S. Nolte and Associates has been hired to prepare the drainage and exca-
vation plan and to prepare a preliminary closure plan which address these
problems. The process will involve consulting with the East Bay Municipal
Utility District and Pacific Gas and Electric Company to address any conditions
or concerns posed by the excavation project. When t:iese plans are prepared, a
complete cost estimate can be developed.
SW3-REP 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 19th _
day of March 1980, by and between the CITY OF LODI,
(hereinafter "CITY"), and SAN JOt'!QUIN COUNTY, (hereinafter "COUNTY"),
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, CITY and -COUNTY have title to certain real and per-
sonal property located at 14750 East Harney Lane, Lodi, California,
known as HARNEY LANE LANDFILL, (hereinafter "LANDFILL"); and
WHEREAS, by Agreement dated January 2, 1975, (hereinafter
"AGREEMENT") CITY and COUNTY provided that COUNTY would assume the
sole responsibility for the operation, maintenance and supervision
of the LANDFILL; and
WHEREAS, the Solid Waste Facility Permit No. 39 -AA -003, issued
by San Joaquin Local Heath District to the LANDFILL pursuant to.
guidelines established by State Solid Waste Management Board for
landfills, requires development of a Final Site Plan (hereinafter
"PLAN");
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that:
1. The PLAN being developed shall be reviewed by CITY and
COUNTY. CITY shall have input to the PLAN but shall not have the
right,to veto the final County -proposed PLAN. At the closure of
the site, CITY shall have the right to review any technical report,
made by COUNTY to the Regional Water Quality Control Board, regarding -
the closure of the site.
2. At such time as the PLAN is approved by CITY and COUNTY
and the LANDFILL conforms to the PLAN, monitoring of the LANDFILL
shall be implemented consistent with the PLAN and as specified in
the Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 78-147 by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region.
3. COUNTY shall provide those services necessary to monitor. ==`
and to maintain the LANDFILL for a period not to exceed ten (10)
years following closure of the site as a sanitary landfill but both
COUNTY and CITY shall have continuing responsibility for meeting
the standards for which the monitoring program is implemented.
COUNTY shall be entitled to receive any grazing revenues derived
from the use of the site as grazing land.
COUNTY and CITY shall have a continuing responsibility to
assure the protection of useable waters at the LANDFILL. Such pro-
tection as specified in Waste Discharge Requirement No. 78-147,
issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,
shall be provided by the COUNTY and CITY.
4. All costs related to the monitoring and maintenance of
the site shall be chargeable to the County Refuse Disposal Budget
and will be funded by the users of the COUNTY operated solid waste
facilities.
5. COUNTY shall cause the LANDFILL to be graded to the ap-
proved PLAN requirements when the LANDFILL operations are terminated-.
6. The ultimate use for LANDFILL site shall be approved only
as suitable for dry grazing land. The LANDFILL site shall remain
unused for one year after the LANDFILL operations are terminated.
The LANDFILL elevations shall be determined one year after termination-..-
2 -.k...
of the LANDFILL operations and necessary adjustments of such ele-
vations shall be made to conform to the PLAN.
7. COUNTY or CITY may terminate this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
and the AGREEMENT by giving four years written notice tc the other
party of the intention to so terminate.
8. The responsibility for any LANDFILL use change authorized'
by CITY, and costs incurred therefor, shall be assumed by CITY.
The COUNTY shall thereafter have no further obligation under this -
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT or the AGREEMENT and this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREE-
MENT and the AGREEMENT shall then terminate.
9. Services to be provided at the LANDFILL in excess of these-
California
hese California Regional Water Control Board
minimum services required by the Stake of California under 3WRM
Discharge Requirements Order #78-147 and Solid Waste Facilities
Permit #39 -AA -003 and under this Supplemental Agreement shall be
subject to negotiations between the COUNTY and CITY. Responsibilities
for such costs of such services to be provided shall be subject to
negotiation between the COUNTY and CITY.
10. At the end of -the term of this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, or _-
sooner if agreed to by COUNTY and CITY, each Entity shall assume
total responsibility for the parcel of property under its ownership.`_,;;'_`:
All other terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT shall continue-:
to remain in full force and effect except as herein supplemented.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the SUP-
PLEMENTAL AGREEMENT the day and year first written above.
COUNTY OI' SAN JOAQUIN, a
political subdivision of
the State of California
ADRIAN C. FONDSE
By
ADRIAN C. FONDSE, Chairman
Board of Supervisors u
�.h
ATTEST: JORETTA J. HAYDE
Clerk of the Board of Super-
visors of the County of San
Joaquin, State of California
CINDY DUBRUTZ
By
Deputy Clerk `
ATTEST:
&d 'A -
City ler
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GERALD A. SHERWIN
County Counsel
By
TERRENCE R. DERMODY
Deputy County Counsel
APPROVED AS TO FORM_
RONA STEI
City Attorney of Lodi
4
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE
CITY OF LODI AND THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
RELATING TO SOLID WAS'T'E MANAGEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 19th day of
March , 19 80, by and between the COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN,
a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter
"COUNTY", and the CITY OF LODI, a municipal corporation of the State
of California, hereinafter ,"CITY".
WHEREAS, The San Joaquin County Solid Waste Management Plan
calls for a cooperative effort by the County of San Joaquin and the
Cities of the County of San Joaquin for the management of solid
wastes existing within the County;
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and COUNTY agree as follows:
1. COUNTY shall be responsible for providing a solid waste
disposal facility or facilities in the north County area to serve
residences and businesses in the north County incorporated and
unincorporated areas. Adequate solid waste disposal or trans-
portation facilities such as a disposal site and/or a transfer
station will be established by COUNTY within a reasonable proximity
to CITY in order to serve the need to dispose of solid waste
generated within CITY'S corporate limits.
2. CITY shall not be required to participate initially in
the capital financing of the facilities referred to in paragraph 1
of this Agreement. COUNTY shall advance the funds necessary to
establish and operate the facilities.
Cn
3. COUNTY intends to recover its capital and operating costs
for each COUNTY refuse disposal site through charges to users of
each such site.
{
4. The charges for use shall be the same for all north
County users whether from the incorporated or unincorporated areas.
The charges may be adjusted as necessary in order to cover capital
and operating costs of the facilities.
5. Refuse collectors franchised* by CITY who use COUNTY pro-
vided facilities shall pay for disposal services at the rates es-
tablished by COUNTY. At the option of CITY, these payments may be
completely or partially paid by City.
6. COUNTY will review its plans regarding the location of
such facilities with CITY and CITY shall assist COUNTY in defining
and obtaining a desirable location for such facilities.
7. In recognition of COUNTY'S responsibility to fully finance
the development and operation of such facilities, COUNTY retains
the exclusive right to establish terms and conditions of operation
of the facilities, including rates to be charged.
8. CITY retains the right to regulate the collection and
transportation of all solid waste materials within the corporate E
limits of CITY. r.
9. As long as the existing HG.-ney Lane Landfill is used for
the disposal of .refuse collected within CITY, CITY and COUNTY shall ter=
continue to utilize the existing agreement for the operation the.
Harney Lane Landfill effective January 1, 1975, between CITY and COUNTY
10. This Agreement shall continue in effect unless voided by
State action, except that either party may terminate the Agreement
r sem:
by giving four years written notice of its intention to terminate -=
APK
2 -
�rrYriz
(dh
to the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
APR 819801
Agreement this day of , 1980.
q
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a
political subdivision of
the State of California
URIAN -0. FONDSE
By
ADRIAN C. FONDSE, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
ATTEST: JORETTA J. HAYDE
Clerk of the Board of Super-
visors of the County of San
Joaquin, State of California ¢..
By ( '.
Deputy Clerk
ATTEST: CITY OF LODI, a municipal
corporation of the State
1 of California
Clerk, Cit y_ Lodi I
/,
By --
Title THEO KATZAKIAN, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
GERALD A. SHERWIN
County Counsel