HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - March 18, 1981 (46)oval
m
B
° JUSTIFICATION 0F 1'ROl'05A1,
Rc ani at on or Chart a o£ Or anization AffectinB local encies
F'i.led' *ith local Agency Formation Cot tssion of -San Joaquin County
cjb Dewey Em Mansfield, Executive Officer
County Courthouse, Room 153
222 East. Leber Avenue Phone: (209) 944-2196 Date-
Stockton,
ate- 3rb�81
Stock ton, California 95202
The undersigned, oa behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby gives notice
of intention to:
® incorporate a city
® fora a district
annex territory to an agency
(� consolidate existing agencies
diaincorporate a city
g dissolve a district
®c detach territory from an agency
To further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following:
1m Three (3) copies of this completed $°Justification of Proposal"
20' Fifteen (15) copies of legal mates and bounds description of affected territory -
consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Office
3® Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies
(maps to be no smaller than 8�" x II" which is the most preferable size and
shall be aro larger than 18" x 26".
4m Filing & processing fees in accordance with LAFCO fee schedule
The following persons (not 'to exceed three) are tb be hailed copies of the Executive
Officerfe Report and notice of commission herrings regarding the subject proposal®
ALICE M. REIMCHE, CITY CLERK, 221 blest Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
mare addre s s
TOM NOMA, 4131 E. Almond Drive, Lodi, CA 95240
n address
JAMES D. SCHROEDER, Community Development Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
(name) (address)
COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS aigne
If a question is not applicable to your proposal, ou may so state.
lm Local agency organization changes hereby proposed—designate affected agencies and
annexations by name:
NOMA REORGANIZATION. Annex territory to the City of Lodi. Detach terriotry from the
Woodbridge Eire Protection District.
2. Statutory provisions governing proceedings:
Title 6, Division 1 (corrwtencing with Sec. 56000) of the California Government
Cede District Reorganization Act of 1965.
Page 1
30 DcA r. vr,osed boundaries create an island or corridor of unincorporated territory?
proposed boundaries split linea of a0sesement or ownership?
NO
Land arca affected: square milers acres 20 acres
6, population in subject area- 2 7. Number of registered voters: 2
g® Registered voter density (ppr acre): .10 9. Number of dwelling units:__ i
LCI. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years-
250 -
It. present land use of subject area:
Parcel is in agriculture use. Surrounding area is a mixture of residential,
commercial, industrial and agricultural.
Q. What is the intended development of this area:
Residential,
13. Present zoning;:
R-2, Residential single-family
14. Describe proposed zoning changes:
$ion e .
15. Assessed value of land: 56,610
16. Assessed value of improvements: $ 30,702
17. Value of publicly owned land in area. $ 0-
18. Governmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available-.
Development would require utility extensions and provision of municiple services.
19. What alternative measures mould provide services listed its Item 18 above?
County services and private well and septic tank.
20® 'khat modifications must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to
provide services initiated by this proposal?
Minor extension of streets, water, sewer and storm lines,
21® What approximate coats will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Xtem 20 above?
Not known at this time.
22. How will such costs be met?
Developer will be responsible for major costs.
23. Will provisions of this proposal impose ,greater than normal burden on servicing agency
or affected properr ty7
NO.
24. ® Check here if you are submitting further cormentu and evaluations on additional pages,.
Page 2
-- r-._---- - - -
^' � 7t�5�'r""""
W w �WE
lcoxr
At HO
ITY LIMITS
q
a»
DR
.dNEGATIVE DFLumnw
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department has
determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment Supporting documentation is available
in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Hall
Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance
of this declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than
the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal".
Date March 3 1981 Project Title: NOMA REORGANIZATION
Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Con -act Person:
NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
CITY OF LODI
Address: City: County:
221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA San Joaquin County
Area Code: Phone,
(209)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION
The applicant, 'Tom Noma, is requesting annexation of a 20 plus acre pare _IQ --Lb City of
Lodi: The parcel is located on the north side of Almond Drive., West of Che
e:
The property is designated Residential low desnity (1--10 units per acre) by both the San
Joaquin County S Lodi General Plan. The area is also zoned R-2, Resldentlai single family
5-6 units pera r bszllinnonr_L,nr�1�_ The prosect §re w s �..�
"Sot oc
"Southeast Lodi EIR 79-3." Copies are: available from the Planning Department.
ro1`1ecatloonn C1 y roJCCt oC
P atlon 1,11Funty
LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
March 16 1981
Last Date o ppea Address Where Pre minarynv ronment
Assessment is Available:
LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240
Phone: (209) 334--5634
d
NOMA REORGANIZATION NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Description
The proposed Noma Reorganization is a 20± acre annexation to the City of
Lodi. The project will also include detachment from the Woodbridge Fire
Protection District.
The annexation is located north of Almond Drive between Chreokee Lane and
Stockton Street. (See attached maps).
The subject property is designated low-density residential (1-10 units per
acre) in both the San Joaquin County and City of Lodi General Plans. The
parcel is zoned R-2, residential single-family by the San Joaquin County,
and was prezoned R-2, residential single --family (average 5-6 units per acre)
by the City of Lodi In 1973.
The parcel is adjacent to the existing City limits. To the north and east
are existing commercial and residential uses. On the south are scattered
residences and two approved residential projects. On the west are mixtures of
agricultural, scattered residential and industrial uses.
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The annexation will have no significant affects on the environment. Future
development of the property could affect the environment. Those ir.)pacts were
discussed in the Southeast Lodi EiR 79.3 prepared by the City of Lodi Community
Development Department.
Development with residential use could result in up to 100-120 dwelling units.
The property has the appropriate zoning and General Plan Designation for this
type of use and there are adequate utilities available in the area. The area
Is in Residential Growth Phase 1.
Mitigation of the impact of additional students on the L.U.S.D. (estimated at
100-120 students) should be mitigated by requiring financial participation by
the developer. This can be acheived by some form of payment by the developer
to L.U.S.D. to help pay for additional classroom facilities. The exact form
and amount of payment would be worked out by the developer and the L.U.S.D.
based on the recommendations of the County --wide Task Force on School Financing
TO- L.U.S.. O.
LAr Co
Woodbridge Fire Protection Dist.
San Joaquin County
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
Negative Declaration
NOMA RECAGANiZATiON
f
NORTH SIDE OF ALMOND DRIVE BETWEEN S. CHEROKEE LANE AND S. STOCKTON TO.
ro Fect ocat on Specific
Description of nature, purpose, and beneficiaries of project: The applicant,
TOM NOMA, is requesting annexation of a 20 ac re arcel to Che Cit of Lodi.
The parcel is located in the southeast section of Lodi and is surrounded b
the City on three sides. The parcel is currently designated low'.density
residential in both the S.J. County and Lodi General Plan (1-10 units/acre).
The existing S.J. County zoning is R-2, residential single family. The zoning
would permit 4-5 units per acre. No development plans have been submitted.
CITY OF LODI DAVID MORIMOTO (209) 334-5634
ea gency ontac t erson�
221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
ares;--
February
es;—
February 17, 1981
D
Please convent by 3-10--81
fur agency would -appreciate appreciate corrxnents on the scope and areas n w tisi c�o�r
agency feels an environmental review should cover, as well as any data Vdhich
may be pertinent to the project.
.J .
X3�
Environmental Assessment
INITIAL STUDY
�. PROJECT TITLE NOMA REORGANIZATION _
2. LOCATION North side of Almond Drive between Cherokee La S S. Stockton St. (See Map)
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Tom Noma, is requesting annexation of:
20 acres of land to the City of Lodi. The proposal will also include withdrawal °
from the Woodbridge Rural Fire District. The applicant has not submitted an �
development plans although the area is zoned R-2 by both the S.J.Co. 8 City of Lodis �
4. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (R) Proposed Low Density
Residential 1-10 units er acre. No dhan a 2roposed.
5. Site description and surrounding land use The subject pro2erty is In
agricultural:use., Areas to.the north and east are commercial and residential.
6. Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) R--2, Residential. single fami_l
B
R-2, No than e.
Will
the Project have a Si nificant Effect
YFL—o—u--V-Any of the Following Impacts?
Yes No
Maw }
7, a.
Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil
orsubsoil features ...................................
b.
Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality..
X
c.
Substantially deplete surface or groundwater
resources .............................................
X
d.
Substantially Interfere with groundwater flow
or recharge ...........................................
X
C.
Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion
orsiltation ..........................................
X
f.
Substantial interference with the habitat of any
species of fish, wildlife or plant....... .............
X`
ge
Violate ambient air quality standards or create
substantial air emissions or objectionable odors......
h.
Substantially increase ambient noise or glare
X X
level for adjoining areas ..........................
1.
Substantial reduction of existing cropland............
X
Expose Individuals or property to geologic, public
health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards......
X
Adverse Impacts of project and their magnitude: Development of 20 acres at an
R-2 zonin2could result in 100 dwelling units. 1O0� s u e
the school district.
Mitigation Pleasures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by Initial Study:
the school impaction will be mitigated by the payment of the "bedroom fee"
!2nd&-r—the f
countywide taskforce on school financing.
RECOMMENDATION
Negative Declaration EIR X Conditional Negative
Declaration
This property was Included in the Southeast Lodi EIR 79-3
Copies are available on request.
. F UVIT-A.1..
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
E=nvironmental ReNiew Officer
63
�Y i! `i �..--.—...•loll '•-♦ 't,
.,_:'r�s, �.>....�aF.ti..{:..;•'M,,`;i;y$_o. ._:•;�'"��.. .. .. ........ .. __loll. .,_.h,.avTinru�*a ... .�+�y¢.�ct+.a«otsx�a�x na
.x:4iShx�3S.�'S+"i'tL�'�:{�2� "mnkrow'NAi
C� .
Yes 'No Maybe
k.
Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
effect ...............................................
X
1.
Result In the disruption or alteration of an
archeological, historical or paleontological site....
X
m.
Cause or allows substantial Increase in consumption in
anynatural resources.......................loll....,
X
n.
Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy .......................................
X
o.
Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm
drain, electrical lines or public roads ..............
p.
Substantially Increase demand for or utilization of
public services such as schools or fire or police
protection...... ...................... ...........
q.
Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
availability or traffic safety .......................
r.
Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace -
me nt of population ...................................
_
s.
Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or
plannedland uses.... ..............................
X
t.
Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of
theCity of Lodi ....................................
X
Adverse Impacts of project and their magnitude: Development of 20 acres at an
R-2 zonin2could result in 100 dwelling units. 1O0� s u e
the school district.
Mitigation Pleasures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by Initial Study:
the school impaction will be mitigated by the payment of the "bedroom fee"
!2nd&-r—the f
countywide taskforce on school financing.
RECOMMENDATION
Negative Declaration EIR X Conditional Negative
Declaration
This property was Included in the Southeast Lodi EIR 79-3
Copies are available on request.
. F UVIT-A.1..
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
E=nvironmental ReNiew Officer
63
�Y i! `i �..--.—...•loll '•-♦ 't,
.,_:'r�s, �.>....�aF.ti..{:..;•'M,,`;i;y$_o. ._:•;�'"��.. .. .. ........ .. __loll. .,_.h,.avTinru�*a ... .�+�y¢.�ct+.a«otsx�a�x na
.x:4iShx�3S.�'S+"i'tL�'�:{�2� "mnkrow'NAi
CITY LIMITS
i
CITY LIMITS
w
a+v�mxcw�le..i�...:-:..r.....................�..r.._.a.T.wm.rru., .:.a..:....-�.... _. __..®__....... �...._..-... ...
CITY COUNCIL
WALTER KATNICH, Mayor t
JAM1% A. MtCARTY, Mayor Pro Tem CITY OF Ujul
K101ARD L. Iii CH[S CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
ROBERT G. MURP11Y
JAMES W. PINKERTON, it. LOp#, CALIFORNIA 95280
(209) 334-5534
March 25, 1981
Nix', Gerald F. Scott
Executive Of9icer
Local Agency Formation Commission
County Courthouse, Room -153
222 East Weber Avenue
Stockton, CA 35202
HENRY A. GLAVES, it.
City Manager
ALICI M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
RONALD M. STEIN
City Attorney
Ree "NOMA ADDITION" REORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF LODI .AND
DETACHMENT FROM THE WOODBRIDGE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT
Gentlemen;
Enclosed please find the following documents pertaining to the
aforementioned reorganization and detachment:
1. Three (3) copies of "Justification of Proposal"
2e Fifteen (.15) copies of legal metes and bounds description
of affected territory - consistent with standards accept-
able to the County Surveyor's office
3. Fifteen (1.5) copies of maps showing affected territory and
affected agencies (area and vicinity maps)
4. Filing fee of $300000
5. Seven 0) copies of Resolution 81-28 - "Resolution of the
Lodi City Council for the application to the San Joaquin
County Local Agency Formation Commission in the matter of
the proposed "Lorna Addition" reorganization, including the
detachment of certain territory within the area proposed
for annexation to the City of Lodi."
Also enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration.
Please do not hesitate to call, should you need additional
information regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,
Alice M. Re mche
City Cleric
Enc,
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
f ReorRant7*tion or Chan e of Organization Affecl�ocal A enciec
Filed' *ith Lacal Agency Formation Co=iasion of -San Joaquin County
01b Dewey E. Mansfield, EXecutive Officer
County Courthouse, Room 153 3-6-81
222 East Weber Avenue phone: (209) 944.2196 Dated
Stockton, California 95202
The undersigned, on behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby give notice
of intention to
Ll incorporate a city
Li fora a district
annex territory to an agency
consolidate existing agencies
® disincorporate a city
�I dAasolve a district
detach territory from an agency
To further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following:
lm Three (3) copies of this Pompleted 99Jurtification of Proposal"
2.1 Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected territory «
consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Office
3® Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies
(maps to be no smaller than 8�" x 1191 whirh is the most preferable size and
*hall "be no larger than 1811 x 2611.
4m Filing & processing fees in accordance with LAFCO fee schedule
The following persons (nog to exceed three) are tb be mailed copies of the Exec"t.Lve
Off icezvr Report and notice of commission herrings regarding the subject proposal -
ALICE M. REIMCIIE, CITY CLERK, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
name address
ION MORITA, 24 N. Main Street, Lodi, CA 95240
(name) (address)
JAMES R. SCHROEDER, Community Development Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95250
name address
COMPLETE ALL QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS sign
If a question is not applicable to your propos1 you may so state.
lm Local agency organization change* hereby proposed ---designate affected agencies and
annexations by name:
NOMA REORGANIZATION. Anne; territory to the City of Lodi. Detach terriotry from the
Woodbridge Eire Protection District.
2. Statutory provisions governing proceedings:
Title 6, Division l (commencing with Sec. 56000) of the California Government
Code District Reorgan=nation Act of 1965.
Page 1
. ."'krnx': 5C7'' `es`�-b6Y�ia�Gt:3ae,a�3 •.?✓ ,.� ...,, i... a. i.'�-��. ,. ,.�... .e. t1}a.-. `'J��'"xaa. .-xur. - n-,w^,wee �..�r ,. .
0
Do proposed boundaries create an island or corridor of unincorporated territory?
i.
NO
4. Do proposed boundaries split, lines of assessment or ownership?
NO
5� band area affected: square miles acres 20 acres
6� Population in subject area: 2 7m Number of registered voter's: 2
8m Registered voter density (per acre): .10 9® Number of dwelling units: 1
10.
Estimate of population increase in next 10 years:
250-
11,„
Present land use of subject area:
Parcel is In agriculture use. Surrounding area is a
mixture of residential,
commercial, industrial and agricultural.
12.
What: is this intended development of this area.
.
Residential.
1.3®
resent zoning:
R°-2, Residential single --family
14.
Describe proposed zoning changes:
None.
1.5.
Assessed value of land: 56,610
16.
A-9aBessed value of improvements: $ 30,702
17®
Value of publicly owned land in area-. $ -0-
18.
Governmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available:
Development would require utility extensions and provision of municiple services.
19.
What alternative measures would provide services listed
in Xtem lg above?
County services and private well and septic tank.
20.
What modifications must be made to existing utility and
governmental facilities to
provide services initiated by this proposal?
Minor extension of streets, water, sewer and storm lines.
21@ What approximate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Xtem 20 above?
Not known at this time.
22® Hors will such costs be met?
Developer will be responsible for major costs.
23. Will provisions of this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency
or affected property?
24® Teck here if you are aubmit,ting further comments and evaluations on additional page:.
Page 2
Y*�t'-S��L,!�.--�+^.-rz;•+�.,,.-i.➢���.�t��rt ts1w�.
NOMA ADDITION
A portion of "A. J. LARSON'S SUBDIVISION" of the Northeast
one-quarter of Section 13, Township 3 Worth, Range 6 East, Hount
Diablo Base and Meridian, the map or plat being filed in Book of
Official Maps and Plats, Volume 2, page b, San Joaquin County
Records, and described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of GEWEKE ADDITION NO. 3,
as annexed to the City of Lodi by Lodi City Resolution No. 4332,
said point being also the Northwest corner o� Lot 11 of said
"A.J. LARSON'S SUBDIVISION," thence North 87 07' East, along the
existing City Limit line, 991.69 feet to the Northwest corner of
ALMOND DRIVE ADDITION, as annexed to the City of Lodi by Lodi City
Resolution No. 3630; thence South OOo 38' East, along the existing
City Limit line, 867.00 feet to a point: in TANDY RANCH ADDITION,
as annexed to the City of Lodi by Lodi City Resolution No. 80-36;
thence South 86o 44' West, along the existing City Limit line,
958.25 feet to the Northwest corner of said TANDY RANCH ADDITION;
thence leaving said City Limit line, South 860 44' West, 35.75
feet, more or less, to the Southwest corner of Lot 11 of said
B1A. Jo LARSON'S SUBDIVISION"; thence northerly, along the West
line of said Lot 11, to the Northwest corner of said Lot and the
point of beginning.
Containing 20.09 acres, more or less.
ACACIA
--jENOMA REORGANIZATION
OS7-1
rT� --c-
"KA S 3-r FT
CITY LIMITS
LANE
GIN
DRIVE
,I m
0
NOMA REPRGANIZA`I"ION
057-160-1
_CT_ ��
T .'"F"4
W-2
CITY LI
0
rom M. NOME 3631
YuRiKo NoMA
4131 E. ALMON)) MOVE
LOW. CALM 95240 W -a"
F2 —11
2 -
TO THE
TOM 4. NOMA Ak
BOIS W.CTS.-
fhmers & Iffie rchants Bank
*P' CKNINAL CAU"R414
LODI. CALIFORNIA
000-227LB-8V
j,V
r�
RESOLUTION NO, 81-28
RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
APPLICATION TO THE SAN SOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROPOSED ";.,OMA" REORGANIZATION INCLUDING
THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY WITHIN THE
AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF
LODI
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District
Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title 6
(commensing with Section 56000) of the California Government
Code, and;
WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organiza-
tion is the annexation of the City of Lodi of an area comprising
20009 acres, more or less, and the withdrawal of said 20.09 acres
from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District and described
and depicted in Exhibit "A".
WHEREAS, no other counties, cities or districts are
affected, and;
WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the
City of Lodi and detached from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection
District is uninhabited;
WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by
this reorganization, and;
WHEREAS$ the reasons for this proposal are as follows,
(1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban
confines of the City and will generate service
needs substantially similar to that of other in-
corporated urban areas which require municipal
government service.
(2) Annexation to the City of ]Dodi of the subject area
will result in improved economics of scale in
government operations while improving coordination
in the delivery of panning services.
(3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of San
,Joaquin will benefit from the proposed reorganization
as a result of savings to the County by reduction
of County required services in unincorporated
but urban oriented area®
(4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the
City of Lodi is geographically, socially, econo-
mi.callya and politically part of the same urban
areA of which the City of Lodi is also a part.
(S) The subject area is within the Lodi sphere of
influence.
(6) Future inhabitants of a City residential sub-
division in the subject area will gain immediate
response in regard to police and fire protection,
unlimited City garbage and trash collection
service, street lighting service, a modern sower
system, other municipal services, and improvement
of property values.
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Lodi that the San Joaquin County Local Agency
Formation Commib�sion is hereby requested to approve the proposed
"Noma" reorganization which includes annexation of 20.09
acres from the Woodbridge Rural Fire ]protection District as
described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. This is
all subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
Dated: march 1.8, 1981
I hereby certify that. Resolution No. 81--28 was passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in
a regular meeting held March 18, 1981 by the following
vote:
Ayes- Councilmen ® McCarty, Murphy, Hughes, Pinkerton
and Katnich
Noes: Councilmen - Hone
Absents Councilmen _ None
ALICE M. REIMeHE
City Clerk
81--28
-2-
P
as a result of savings to the County by reduction
of County required services in unincorporated
but urban oriented area®
(4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the
City of Lodi is geographically, socially, econo-
mi.callya and politically part of the same urban
areA of which the City of Lodi is also a part.
(S) The subject area is within the Lodi sphere of
influence.
(6) Future inhabitants of a City residential sub-
division in the subject area will gain immediate
response in regard to police and fire protection,
unlimited City garbage and trash collection
service, street lighting service, a modern sower
system, other municipal services, and improvement
of property values.
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Lodi that the San Joaquin County Local Agency
Formation Commib�sion is hereby requested to approve the proposed
"Noma" reorganization which includes annexation of 20.09
acres from the Woodbridge Rural Fire ]protection District as
described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. This is
all subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
Dated: march 1.8, 1981
I hereby certify that. Resolution No. 81--28 was passed
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in
a regular meeting held March 18, 1981 by the following
vote:
Ayes- Councilmen ® McCarty, Murphy, Hughes, Pinkerton
and Katnich
Noes: Councilmen - Hone
Absents Councilmen _ None
ALICE M. REIMeHE
City Clerk
81--28
-2-
WEGATIVE �T10N
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning department has
determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment Supporting documentation is available
in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for public review in the planning Department Office, City !-sail
Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing. to appeal the issuance
of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no Tater than
the date indicated as `Last date to Appeal°°°
Date- March 3. 1981 Project Title.- NOMA REORGANIZATION
Responsible Agency: _ Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person.-
NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
CITY Or LODI
Address:
Ci ty:
County. -
221 West Pine Street Lodi, £A San Joaquin County
a Code: Phone;
(209 fi3 _.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION
The applicant, Tom Loma, is reques^ ting annexation of a 20 plus acre parr, 1 tQ_the City of
Lodi: The parcel is located on the north side of Almond Drive., West of Cherokee L nc;
The property Is designated Residential low desnity (1.10 units per acre) --by by oth the San
.Joaquin County •°'Lodi General Plan. The area is also zoned R-2, Residential sing -le family
(5-6 units per acre) by S. n , o ui�a_Ccai�n4 f_�ai The prosect area was c�y_o-ped ls� the
"Southeast Lodi EIR 79'3." Copies are available: from the Planning Department.
erect Location City Project Locatiall °linty
LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
rch 16. 1981
ppeal: Address Where Preliminary Environment
Assessment is Available:
LOOT CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine Ste, Lodi, CA 95240
Phone: (209) 334--5634
P � \
NOMA REORGANIZATION NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pro ect Descri tion
The proposed Noma Reorganizat^on is a 20± acre annexation to the City of
Lodi. The project will also include detachment from the Woodbridge Fire
Protection Dist-ict.
The annexation is located north of Almond Drive between Chreokee Lane and
Stockton Street. (Seer attacked maps).
The sutject property is designated low-density residential (1-10 units per
acre} in both the San Joaquin County and City of Lodi General Plans. The
)arcel is zoned R--2, residential single-family by the San Joaquin County,
and was prezoned R-2, residential single --family (average 5--6 units per acre)
by the City of Lodi in 1973.
The parcel is adjacent to ;he existing City limits. To the north and e:7st
are existing commercial and residential uses. On the south are scattered
residences and two approved residential projects. Onthe west are mixtures of
agricultural, scattered residential and industrial uses.
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The annexation will have no significant affects on the environment. Future
development of the property could affect the environment. Those impacts were
discussed in the Southeast Lodi EIR 79-3 prepared by the City of Lodi Co;nmunity
Development department.
Development with residential use could result in up to 100-120 dwelling units.
The property has the appropriate zoning and General Plan Designation for this
type of use and there are adequate utilities available in the area. The area
Is ir4 Residential Growth Phase 1.
Mitigation of the impact of additional students on the L.U.S.D. (estimated at
100-120 students) should be mitigated by requiring financial participation by
the developer. This can be acheived by some form of pafinent by the developer
to L.U.S.D. to help pay for additional classroom facilities. The exact form
and amount of payment would be worked out by the developer and the L.U.S.D.
based on the recommendations of the Countywide Task Force on School Financing.
TO. L. U. S. D.
LAFCo
Woodbridge Fire Protection Dist.
San Joaquin County
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
Negative Declaration
NOMA REORGANIZATION
roast to
NORTH SIDE OF ALMOND DRIVE 3ETWEEN S. CHEROKEE LANE AND S. STOCKTON TO.
biro act ocat an pec f�c
Description of nature, purposes and beneficiaries of project:
The applicant,
TOM NOMA is requesting,annexation of a 20 ac rij�arcel to the Cit of Ladi.�
The parcel Is located in the southeast section of Lodi and is surrounded b
the City on three sides. The parcel is currently designated low'.densit_)
residential In both the S.J. County and Lodi General Plan (1-10 units/acre),
The existing S.J. County zoning is R-,2, residential single family. The zoning
would permit 4-5 units per acre.; No development plans have been submitted,
CITY OF LODI DAVID AIORIHOTO (209) 334-5634
ea gency Contact arson one
9
221 West Pini: Street, Lodi, CA 95240
Address ._ -
February 17, 1981
aTrEWYERTW-
Please comment by 3-10-81
—r agency wooer appreciate coninents crn the seope an-J—a—r—e—a—s--fn--wNiU y6ur
agency feels an environmental review should covers as well as any data t,ahich
may be pertinent to the project.
M
M
,:S ��stt✓m-�,._..
._........,,..._.-._..«...„n�..._w.-, *n -.re: rx.. '�+.K
d ., ,� ..... ...... ... i t-..,CiN�oa Ys.!-S'�fi.. .. ...�r+i!a)iRMa”"
.... _... .,. _., ...-..-...
Environmental Assessment
INITIAL. STUDY
;FA:1Y
�.
PROJECT TITLE NOMA REORGANIZATION
Z.
LOCATION North side of Almond Drive between Cherokee Ea &
S. Stockton St. (See Strap)
3.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Tom Noma, is requesting annexation of
20 acres of land to the City of Lodi. The proposal will 'so include withdrawal
from the Woodbridge Rural Fire District. The applicant has
not submitted an
development plans although the area is zoned R-2 by both the
S.J.Co. b City of Lod(.
h.
General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (8) Proposed
Low Den5it
Residential 1--10 units ear acre. No dhan a eroposed.
s
$.
Site description and surrounding land use The subject pro
ert is in
agricultural ;use., Areas to.the north and east are commercial and residential.
6.
Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Pr000sed �(A) R-2, Residential single
Tamilr�-
8 R-2. No change.
Will the Project Slave a Significant Effect
YF An of the Fal l owi n 1 m s7
Ycs ' ' No EwWa�+b
7.
a, Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil
orsubsoil features ............................. .....
b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality..
X
C. Substantially deplete surface or groundwater
resources............................................m
X
d. Substantially interfere with groundwater flow
orrecharge .................................. ... ...
X
®. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erasion
orsiltation.............. .............................
,. X
f. Substantial interference with the habitat of any
species of fish, wildlife or plant...................F
X "
g. Violate ambient air quality standards or create
substantial air emissions or objectionable odors......
h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare
X
levelfor Adjoining areas.............................
1. Substantial reduction of existing cropland....... .e..
X
J. Expose individuals or -property to geologic, public'
health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards......
�
;FA:1Y
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: Development of 20 acres at an
R-2 zoning could result in 100t dwelling units. loo- studeis d
the school district.
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse impacts identified by initial Study:
The school Impaction will be mitigated by the PayTent of the "bedroom fee"
- - and i lem ti a ion
countywi& taskforce on school financing.
RECOMMENDATION `
Negative Declaration EiR X Conditional Negative
Declaration
This property was Included in the Southeast Lodi EiR 79--3,
Copies are available on request.
JAMES B. SCHROBER
Environmental ReNiew officer
rtctlt-R1 ,
-. I.>. ,. i .. r .. s. � .....:.' .��V+NF••kk'.Pta�/vwYati".a. ` t. )
Yes No haybe
k.
Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
effect
X
...................... .......................>.
1.
Result in the disruption or alteration of an
archeological, historical or paleontological site....
X
_F,T
m,
Cause or allow substantial Increase In consumption in
anynatural resources .........a........>...... m.....
X
n.
Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
fusel or energy.. ,.......a>...........
X
o.
.Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm
drain, electrical lines or public roads......,..
X
po
Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
public services such as schools or fire or police
:protection........... .............................a
X
q,
Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
availability or traffic safety >. ....................
X
X
r.'
Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
mentof population....... ... ..........> ..
X
s.
Result In an alteration or conflict with existing or
planned land uses ...................................
X
t.
Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of
the City of Lodi ....................................
X
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: Development of 20 acres at an
R-2 zoning could result in 100t dwelling units. loo- studeis d
the school district.
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse impacts identified by initial Study:
The school Impaction will be mitigated by the PayTent of the "bedroom fee"
- - and i lem ti a ion
countywi& taskforce on school financing.
RECOMMENDATION `
Negative Declaration EiR X Conditional Negative
Declaration
This property was Included in the Southeast Lodi EiR 79--3,
Copies are available on request.
JAMES B. SCHROBER
Environmental ReNiew officer
rtctlt-R1 ,
-. I.>. ,. i .. r .. s. � .....:.' .��V+NF••kk'.Pta�/vwYati".a. ` t. )
.__.....s.v:vwlNYt?!1.a+<..uT�.:.,..-.w..rw-i+-,,...w.:xe...v�=rr.�:..+,,:.... .. _...........�....,..�_,.._.,........,.... ........,.y..�_ ....... ..
1 .{