Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 24, 1982 (7)0 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS February 24. 1982 A Special/Adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning at 8:00 p.m. Wednesday. February 24, 1982 in the City Hall Council Chambers. Pursuant to the foregoing written notice. A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning at 8:00 p. m.. Wednesday, February 24. 1982 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall. 221 West Pine Street. KCVR, KSTN Radio Stations, the "Lodi News Sentinel". Lodi Cable TV, "Stockton Record " and "Lodi Life and Times" were apprised in advance of the meeting by City Clerk Reimche. Notices were sent to each member of the Council and to the above listed media pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California. The Special Meeting was called to consider the following items: ROLL CALL SPECIAL MEETING a) Consideration of the request of Morris and Weneli. 301 West Locust Street. Lodi. California, for public condemnation c the right-of-ways on the Snell and Jerome. properties (Assessor Y - reel Nos. 049-020-02 and 049-020-16) Discussion and appropriate action) b.) PUBLIC HEARING - To consider the improvement plans for downtown traffic circulation: specifically one-way streets on Oak and Walnut Street in the City of Lodi. (Discussion and appropriate action) I Present: Councilmen - Hughes. Katnich, Murph Pinkerton. and McCarty (Mayor) Absent: Councilmen - None Also Present: City Manager Glaves, Assistant -I- City Manager Glenn, Public Works Director Ronsko, Associate Civil Engineer Prima, Assistant Planner Starr. City Attorney Stein. and City Cle rk Reim che INVOCATION The invocation was given by Reverend Vernon Robertson PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor McCarty ALLEGIANCE SPECIAL MEETING Agenda item "a" as heretofore set forth was introduced by City Attorney Stein. Diagram -a of tha_ subject area REQUEST FOR was presented and explained in detail by Associate PUBLIC CONDEMNA - Civil Engineer Richard Prima. TION OF RIGHT -OF - WAYS ON ASSESSOR Speaking in favor of the proposed request were: PARCEL NOS. 049-020-02 and a) Mr. Robert Morris, Architect, President of 049-020-16 Morris and Wenell, 301 West Locust Street, Lodi, '!^ t representing Cal -Cushion and Willow Oaks Business Park. -I- A very lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff and to persons in the audience who had given testimony. Councilman Katnich then moved to keep Turner Road as a two lane road until such time as traffic warrants four lanes. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hughes, but failed to pass by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen Hughes and Katnich Noes: Councilmen - Murphy. Pinkerton, and McCarty Absent: Councilmen - None Following Additional discussion and questions, Council- man Pinkerton moved "that we try to acquire the property so we. can continue the streets and tie It into the existing contract and get ,it dune at a .. reasonable price so it's done, out of the way, and so we have a development with an access to the Industrial area of the City of Lodi". . The motion war seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy► and carried by the follov.1 ng vote: Ayes: Councilmen - Murphy, :Pinkerton and McCarty Noes: Councilmen - Hughes and Katnich Absent: Councilmen - None the Council reconvened at approximately 9.50 p.m. Mayor McCarty then called for the Public Hearing to consider the improvement pians for downtown traffic circulaCion; specifically one-way streets on Oak and Walnut Street in the City of Lodi (Discussion and appropriate action) -2- 1�9 • � Continued February 24, 1981 REQUEST FOR b) Mr. Jack Ward, California Cushion Company, PUBLIC CONDEMNA- 1011 East Pine Street, Lodi TION. OF RIGHT-OF- WAYS ON ASSESSOR c) Mr. Bill Dorsey. San Joaquin Building Trade PARCEL. NOS. Council 049 -020 -O2 and 049-020-16 The following person spoke In opposition to th-z Cont'd request: a) Mrs. Jan Snell, Cluff Avenue. Lodi - Mrs. Snell stated that she feels the project is excellent. Mrs. Snell asked for answers to a number of questions including why the proposed road curves the way it does. A very lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff and to persons in the audience who had given testimony. Councilman Katnich then moved to keep Turner Road as a two lane road until such time as traffic warrants four lanes. The motion was seconded by Councilman Hughes, but failed to pass by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen Hughes and Katnich Noes: Councilmen - Murphy. Pinkerton, and McCarty Absent: Councilmen - None Following Additional discussion and questions, Council- man Pinkerton moved "that we try to acquire the property so we. can continue the streets and tie It into the existing contract and get ,it dune at a .. reasonable price so it's done, out of the way, and so we have a development with an access to the Industrial area of the City of Lodi". . The motion war seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy► and carried by the follov.1 ng vote: Ayes: Councilmen - Murphy, :Pinkerton and McCarty Noes: Councilmen - Hughes and Katnich Absent: Councilmen - None the Council reconvened at approximately 9.50 p.m. Mayor McCarty then called for the Public Hearing to consider the improvement pians for downtown traffic circulaCion; specifically one-way streets on Oak and Walnut Street in the City of Lodi (Discussion and appropriate action) -2- City Council Meeting February 24, 1982 *I 1 107 CITY COUNC IL, CITY OF LODI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS s February 24, 1932 r NOTICE OF SPE CIA L MEETING NOTICE IS GIVEN that a majority of the members of the City Council of the City of Lodi have called a Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi to be held on Wednesday, February 24, 1982 at 8:00 p. ni. , which meeting is to be held in the City Council Chambers. City Halt. 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. } The business to be transacted at the special meeting consists of -- 94 S a) a Public Hearing to consider the improvement plans for downtown traffic circulation, specifically one-way streets on Oak and Walnut Street in the City of Lodi s f k b) considerat ion of the request of Morris and Wenell, 301 Nest Locust Street, Lodi, California, for public condemnation of the right-of-ways on the Snell and Jerome properties (Assessor Parcel Nos. 049-020-02 and 049-020-16) # f f Information regarding these items may be obtained in the office of the City Clerk at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested parties are invited to present their views. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the meeting � schedu)ed herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing, Dated: February 5, 1982 i By Orcter of the Lodi City Council . E MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department TO: City Manager Glaves DATE: February 24, 1982 City Attorney Stein ✓ Community Development Director Schroeder FROM: Mrs. Starr, Assistant Planner RE: Undeveloped Industrial Land Within the City of Lodi At the present time there are 368.8 undeveloped, industrially zoned acres within the City of Lodi. Parcels are illustrated on a map on file in the Community Development Department. The figure was derived in the following manner: January, 1981 there were 373.3 un- developed industrial acres within the City. This was the figure used in the City's Development Information book. Recent annexations, general plan amendments. and. rezonings-were compiled and added to the base figure of January, 1981. Building permits were compiled to determine new non -vacant acreage, which was subtracted from the above figures. Zone Base Figures Added/Converted Acres Newly Developed Acres Vacant 1/81 Winery Houston Acres 2%82 M-2 262.5 acres +10 a. 14.5 258.0 acres M-1 22.5 +22 a. 44.5 C -M 9.4 9.4 Unclassi- fied 78.9 -22 a. 56.9 Total 373.3 acres +10 acres -14.5 acres 368.8 acres MORRIS & WE LL Jam' a 301 Wes', Locus' Street Lodi. CaMorrna 9524G Phone (20co 369.8258 January 14, 1982 Mr. Jack Ronsko I TY OF ;,00 I 221 Kest ?ine Street _.cdi, ca ifornia 95240 Rcrsko: ar Wtects and planners. inc. _ To be read under "Communications" ...� meeting of 1/20/82 As ar_n_cects for thi! ;-iiiow yaks inAustrial Park and Cay -Cushion inc., w -t> are ._`or:..ai Iy req.uestinc_ the public condemnation' of Assessor Parcel Nos. 049-020-02 and 049-020-16, Owners Snell and Jerome respectively. he also ask that this request be p -.aced upon the next City Council agenda for review and action. F Cal -Cushion Inc. of Lodi is proposing a new facility that will ac- commodate 300-400 employees. This high employment, along with trucks from Sanitary City Disposal.and other.area industries, will generate a considerable amount of traffic at the interse,'tions of Turner and Cluff Roads. Therefore, it is our professional opinion that in the best interest of the City of Lodi and the tw-p properly owners, the City condemn this property so Turner Road may be constructed to its full design width at this point. Please find enclosed a parcel map indicating this requested con- demnation. If you need any additional information, pleabe do not hesitate to call. e Sincerely, MORRIS & WENELL rchitects and Planners Inc. Robert Morris, Architect President RM:rf Enclosure rot>ert p. morris • tarry wenell N i 04.9-.0 4 -Q1a 049r 16 i SNELL' JE N1 a + existing �1 4--i i residences sidowaik Wcur and gutter PL PLAN BLOW UP r a __.. 1 • 1 oN��ow casa de lodl v n�, oa JQ� willow oaks golf course sanitary city El MORRIS & WE*LL a. -Acts and planners, inc. 3/�{ 301WestLocust Street Captomia 95240 Phone (209) 369-8258 February 1, 1982 LODI CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LODI 221 West gine Street Lodi, California 95240 Gentlemen: In our letter of January 14, 1982 to the City Council, we made an incorrect statement which I wish to correct. I indicated that Morris & Wenell was representing both Cal -Cushion and Willow Oak s Business Park. The fact is Morris & Wenell is representing Cal -Cushion only in this matter. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, MORRIS & WENELL Architects and Planners Inc. Robert Morris, Architect President RM s r f cc: Mr. Ron Judson Littlejohn & Westfall robert p. moniz tarry wene!i i B-41°2 MORRIS & WENILL architects and, r►� lanners inc. p 301 west Locust street LOCI, C Womla 95240 Phone (209) 369-8258 January 29, 1992 Ms. Alice Reimche City Clerk CITY OF LODI 221 West Pine Street Lodi, California 95240 Dear Ms. Reimche: We request that the Public Hearing on the condemnation of the Snell and Jerome properties, Assessor Parcel Nos. 049-020-02 and 049-020-16, be postponed until the February 17 council meeting. I would also like to stress that we are asking for public condemna- tion of the right-of-ways only and not the entire properties. As I indicated in my letter of. January 14, we believe this is a necessity for the increase in traffic that will be placed on the intersection of Cluff and Turner Roads. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call this of f ice. Sincerely, MORRIS & WENELL chitects and Planners Inc. Robert Morris, Architect President RMtrf copy: Cal -Cushion Mr. Ron Judson robert p. morris - larry wenell CITU COUNCIL IAMB A. mCCARTy. MOVW ROBERT C. MURPHY. j%tayor Pro Tem 1TY OF a RICHARD L. HUGHES CITY HALL, 221 HEST PINE STREET WALTER KATNICH POST OFFICE BOX 320 IAMtS W. PINKERTON, Jr LODI. CAUrORNIA 95241 (209) 334-5634 January 21, 1982 Mr. Ron Judson 2306 Corbin Lane Lodi, California 95240 RE: Turner Road Widening Dear Ron: AtNRY VC—LAM. Ir. CitV Ma"B" ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk RONALD M. STEIN City Attorney Thank you very much for taking me to lunch on Thursday, January 21, 1982. I wanted to try to recap the nature of our conversation. As you will note from the cc's', i am sending a copy of this letter to the City Council so that they can also be privy to our conversation. It is my understanding that the people whom you represent would ask the City Council to widen Turner Road and to con- demn the right--of-way over the Jerome and Snell properties> and if the appraiser whom the City hires to appraise the A. taking of the right-of-way from the Jeromes and Snell, d®-- = a J� .: termines that it would be to the City's advantage to take'_ the whole of. the Jerome and Snell properties,. that the people whom you represent would be tiMing to pay to the t� City the cost of the excess take (the home and land minus T� the value of the right-of-way). further, the people whom fi r u represent are willing to put in the street; curb gutter and sidewalk on the right-of-way for the City:' Further, it is my understanding that the people you repre- sent would ask that if the City were able to sell and `rew" the homes that are located on the Jerome and Snell property, tbAt the City would give to the people whom you represent # k credit for whatever the City was able to sell the two hem®e h' for.ij �f 7w i In our discussion, Z mentioned the possibility of the people whom you represent purchasing "thO homes from the Jeromee . and { Snells diractty and it was your voncern that if they wwar�`> able to purchase said 'homes, that the City under present �r >{ policy would require them to dedicate the right-of-way And put in the street. What l sugce3ted to you was that perhaps the City would be willing to purchase the right-of-way from the individuals whom you reprasent rather than requiring you to dedica -e the right-of-way to the City. Mr. Ron Judson 1/21/82 - Page Two One concern that I mentioned during our conversation was if the City were to condemn the Jerome and Snell right-of-ways, that the appraiser might not feel that it is necessary to take the complete properties and this would be of no advan- tage to the people whom you represent. I hope that this adequately represents our conversation and I would certainly appreciate your confirming in writing that it does. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call upon me. Sincerely yours, RONALD M. STEIN CITE ATTORNEY RMSevc cc: Honorable Mayor =:,d Council .�.�. J3i2�+�iln.R•!n++e. _ ._ r ..�.-�_.._ .— - •' 'F' 1Y'44n� 33T•!',..� x' F', : �1.. K.. � a� �j��?ifia}� .�'"s {�M+.in•c�AA1T• AGE:iDA I'_,Eri a. IOUNCIL CON1,MUNICATW ADDITIONAL INFORMATION wsME TO THE CITY COUNCIL -FROM:• THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE • DATE February 24, 1982 SUBJECT: Cluff Avenue Industrial Area (Snell/Jerome) For your information, I am attaching a copy of a memorandum which was prepared by the Community Development Department regarding the Cluff Avenue Industrial area. That memorandum sets forth the chronological order of the development of Turner Road and Cluff Avenue to determine the necessity to complete the widening of Turner Road. What is important for you to remember is that the most that the Council may do this evening is to make the determination, to complete the widening of Turner Road. Upon that determination, the staff should then be directed to employ an appraiser to determine the cost of the right-of-way in front or the Jerome and Snell properties. Once an appraisal has been completed, our right -o€ -way person would then proceed to negotiate with the Jeromes and Snells for the purchase of the right-of-way In front of their property. If s_ some point in the future it is determined that the Jeromes and Snells refuse to sell their property, this Council would then begin the proceedings for a condemnation of the right-of-w=ay. RONALD M. STEIN CITY ATTORNEY RMS:vc attachment M MEMORANDUM, Community Development Department, City of Lodi TO: Ron Stein, City Attorney FROM: David Morincito, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Cluff Avenue -Industrial Area - (Snell/Jerome) TURNER ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN - (Church - Myrtle) Planning Commission Public Hearing 7/13/70 City Council Public Hearing 8/5/70 Adopt Ordinance 1934 8/19/70 Effective date 9/19/70 GENERAL PLAN ACTIVITY - Area shown as Industrial in 1963 Lodi General Plan - April 14, 1975, Planning Commission recommends change in Industrial Areas General Plan to show subject area as Phase 5 (Future Industrial) Industrial. Also recommended Phasing Plan. - June 4. 1975. City Council approves Phase 5 General Plan amendment. Ordinance 1054. PRE20NING - October 23, 1978, Planning Conrnission recc;imends change in Generai Plan to designate this area Phase I and Heavy Industrial except for C -M buffer around Casa de Lodi. - March 21, 1979, City Council approves General Plan change to Phase 1 Industrial. - May 4, 1979, City Council adopts prezoning. ANNEXATION May 16, 1579 (Resolution 79-65) Prezoning becomes final zoning following annexation. C L - ►.4 ria; MORRIS & WEALL arch and fanners, int. P 301 wase Lot:uW Street Lodi, 04fomia 95240 Phone (2209) 369-8258 February 1, 1982 LODI CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LODI 221 West Pini: Street Lodi, California 95240 Gentlemen: In our letter of January 14, 1982 to the City Council, we made an incorrect statement which I wish to correct. I indicated that Morris & Wenell was representing both Cal -Cushion and Willow Oaks Business Park. The fact is Mcrris & Wenell is representing Cal -Cushion only in this matter. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, MORRIS & WENELL Architects and Planners Inc. r '2.ejr m 'D Robert Morris, Architect President RM:rf cc: Mr. Ron Judson Littlejohn & Westfall