HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 18, 1987 (48)d"I'TV f"tiC I nitI
`, I I I t,J I L %./ L-01
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
70: City Council
COUNCIL C()M
M 11'V I(:tl TlOPIv
FROM: City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 189. 1987
AGENDA TITLE: Approve Master Agreement and Preliminary Engineering Agreement
for Wastewater Consulting Services Related to the Expansion
of the City's Treatment Plant Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to
execute the attached Master Agreement and Preliminary Engineering Agreement
between the City of Lodi and the engineering firm of Black and Veatch.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In the 1985/87 Capital Improvement Program,
dollars were budgeted for the EIR preparation and the pre design phase for the
White Slough Treatment Plant facility expansion.
Attached is a copy of the Master Agreement covering in general all of the
engineering services to be performed for the White Slough Treatment Plant
expansion (i.e., preliminary engineering, design engineering, construction
engineering, start-up services, etc.). Also attached is the specific
agreement for the first phase of the work which is the preliminary
engineering. Total estimated cost of the preliminary engineering phase is
$138,473.00. It is estimated that the preliminary engineering phase will
take approximately 450 calendar days to complete.
Both of the subject agreements have been reviewed by the City Attorney.
Because of the magnitude of dollars involved, we had an independent
engineering flym also review these agreements on our behalf.
L. Ronsko
,c Works Director
Attachments
APPROVED:
TNC�`�S A. rc i c�c�gkti, Cs ty Manager
CWSWPCP/TXTW.02M
FILE NO.
February 11, 1987
D I
CITY nF Lnr)l
,%nor '%nor on, 5
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 18, 1987
COUNC``IL L01I1VIUNIC:aTION
AGENDA TITLE: Approve Master Agreement and Pr6 iminary Engineering Agreement
for Wastewater Consulting Services Related to the Expansion
of the City's Treatment Plant Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to
execute the attached Master Agreement and Preliminary Engineering Agreement
between the City of Lodi and the engineering firm of Black and Veatch.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In the 1986/87 Capital Improvement Program,
dollars were budgeted for the EIR preparation and the predesign phase for the
White Slough Treatment Plant facility expansion.
Attached is a copy of the Master Agreement covering in general all of the
engineering services to be performed for the.White Slough Treatment Plant
expansion (i.e., preliminary engineering, design engineering, construction
engineering, star: -up services, etc.). Also attached is the specific
agreement for the first phase of the work which is the preliminary
engineering. Total estimated cost of the preliminary engineering phase is
$138,473.00. It is estimated that the preliminary engineering phase will
take approximately 450 calendar days to complete.
Both of the subje;,t agreements have been reviewed by the City Attorney.
Because of the magnitude of dollars involved, we had an independent
engineering Mm also review these agreements on our behalf.
L. Ronsko
c Works Director
Attachments
APPROVED: a
THOMAS A. PETErcSON, City Manager
CWSWPCP/TXTW.02M
FILE NO.
February 11,1987
ME:mnloAkin IiM ri+\ Cr Lodi, t , Ln D4h1;, Wnrkc DonArtcpent
V - i ..
TO: City Manager and City Council
FROM: Public Works Director
DATE: February 18, I987
SUBJECT: Agenda Item e -1-G, Proposed Amendments to Master Agreement
It is recommended that the wording in Section II - Compensation, paragraph
A, be amended as shown in capital letters.
A. An amount equal to the direct labor cost of the Engineer's
personnel assigned to perform the services for the actual
time they are engaged in performing the services; plus an
amount equal to 1.45 times the direct labor cost for
indirect expenses sweh as COVERING OTHER salary Best
COSTS and SUCH AS FRINGE BENEFITS AND.overhead; plus
reimbursable expenses; plus an apprepr}ate pref4t er A
fixed fee (PROFIT) on these costs AS SPECIFIED IN THE
APPROPRIATE WORK ORDER.
It is recommended that the following section be added as paragraph H under
Section I1 - Compensation:
H. The Engineer shall be responsible for the professional
quality, technical accuracy, timely completion, and the
coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications,
reports; and other services furnished by the Engineer
under the appropriate Work Order. The Engineer shall,
withou� additional compensation, correct or revise any
errors in their designs, drawings, specifications,
reports, and other services.
1441
iPutc
. Ronsko
Works Director
JLR/ma
cc: Dave Requa, Black & Veatch
Water/Wastewater Superintendent
AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
WASTEWATER CONS'1jiTING SERVICES
CITY OF LODI
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES
THIS CONTRACT, made this Igtj, day of rPj�n1ay„ 19 p,-,
by and between the City of Lodi, hereinafter referred to as "Owner," and
Black 6 Veatch, Engineers -Architects, hereinafter referred to as "Engineer":
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Owner is desirous of employing Engineer to provide services herein-
after set forth; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that they are qualified and competent to
perform such services;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual convenants herein contained, the
parties do hereby agree as follows:
SECTION I - SCOPE OF SERVICES. Engineer shall provide, or cause to'be
provided, all engineering services procured by the Owner in support of the
planning, design, and construction of an expansion to the White Slough
Water Pollution Control Facility. Services to be provided by the Engineer,
subsequent to his receipt of the Owner's written authorization to proceed,
shall be specifically detailed in a Work Order which shall, upon approval
by the Owner, become a part of this Agreement. Any subsequent change in
the scope of cost of work shall be by amendment to a Work Order or a new
Work Order. Anticipated services are described in the attached Appendix A,
Scope of Services. Appendix A is incorporated herein by reference.
AlOf l 1 February 10, 1987
SECTION II - COMPENSATION. For services covered by this contract, the
O:.m er agrees to pay the Engineer as follows.
B. Reimbursable expenses include the actual cost of Owner approved subcon-
sultants; required travel and subsistence expense of the Engineer's
personnel other than between the office and the johsite; use of motor
vehicles on a mileage or rental basis for resident engineering other
than between the office and the jobsite; long distance telephone and
telegraph costs; outside reproduction of reports, drawings and specifi-
cations; postage and shipping charges for project -related materials;
rental charges for use of equipment, including equipment owned by
Engineer; and, with prior approval by the Owner, moving costs for
full-time onsite personnel.
C. If efforts and costs required to complete the services as outlined in
each Work Order are less than the amounts estimated, Engineer is
entitled to only those direct labor costs and indirect labor costs and
other direct costs actually required, plus all of the profit agreed to
in the Work Order.
D. If efforts and costs required to complete the series as outlined in
each Work Order are more than the amounts estimated, Engineer shall
notify the Owner in writing prior to exceeding the amounts. Such
notification shall include an estimate of the amounts required to
complete the work. With Owner approval, such amounts wll be paid
Engineer but no increase in profit shall be allowed. Any change in
cost shall be by amendment to the Work Order.
AlOf2 2 February 10, 1987
A. An amount equal to the
direct labor cost of
the Engineer's personnel
assigned to perform the
services for the actual
time they are engaged
in performing the services;
plus an amount
equal to 1.45 times the
�J
direct labor cost for indirect expenses such
as salary cost and over-
head; plus reimbursable
expenses; plus -er fixed!
�J fee or. these costs a5
Sr -7 FA let Att�.4_
2 {a L,,jolk Ode-, %i/o, j
B. Reimbursable expenses include the actual cost of Owner approved subcon-
sultants; required travel and subsistence expense of the Engineer's
personnel other than between the office and the johsite; use of motor
vehicles on a mileage or rental basis for resident engineering other
than between the office and the jobsite; long distance telephone and
telegraph costs; outside reproduction of reports, drawings and specifi-
cations; postage and shipping charges for project -related materials;
rental charges for use of equipment, including equipment owned by
Engineer; and, with prior approval by the Owner, moving costs for
full-time onsite personnel.
C. If efforts and costs required to complete the services as outlined in
each Work Order are less than the amounts estimated, Engineer is
entitled to only those direct labor costs and indirect labor costs and
other direct costs actually required, plus all of the profit agreed to
in the Work Order.
D. If efforts and costs required to complete the series as outlined in
each Work Order are more than the amounts estimated, Engineer shall
notify the Owner in writing prior to exceeding the amounts. Such
notification shall include an estimate of the amounts required to
complete the work. With Owner approval, such amounts wll be paid
Engineer but no increase in profit shall be allowed. Any change in
cost shall be by amendment to the Work Order.
AlOf2 2 February 10, 1987
F Fnr rhnnoac in rho scope of services outlined in each Work Order,-the
profit or fizzed fee shall be subject to renegotiation. Any change in
scope or cost shall be by amendment to the Work Order.
F. The Enginee-: will prepare and submit monthly invoices based on their
regular accounting records for the services performed and reimbursable
expenses incurred in the immediately preceding month. Monthly
payments to the Engineer shall be made within 30 days after billing is
received by the Owner. Carrying charges of 1-1/2 percent per month
(18 percent per year) or the maximum rate allowed by law, if less,
will be due for accounts which are not paid within 60 days after the
billing date.
G. It is mutually agreed and understood that the above compensation does
not include any allowance for local city taxes, license fees, or
special state fees or taxes (excluding state income taxes) which.may
apply to such schedule of fees. Should local taxes or fees be appli-
cable to the above schedule of fees in any regard, it is understood
that amount of such fees or taxes will be added to the above sch,-dole
of fees.
SECTION III - BASIS OF AGREEMENT. It is mutually understood and agreed:
A. The Public Works Director or his designee shall represent the Owner in
all matters hereunder.
B. The designated Project Manager for Engineer is David A. Requa and
shall represent the Engineer on all matters hereunder. He shall not
be removed from the project without prior approval of Owner.
C. Engineer agrees to maintain in full force during the term hereof a
policy of general liability insurance which contains an Additional
Named Insured Endorsement naming the City of Lodi as an Additional
Insured. Engineer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Lodi
from and against all loss, damage and 'Liability to persons and
property arising out of any negligent act or omission of Engineer in
AlOf3 3 February 10, 1987
.,A, rnT rm ,ance of this Contract. The minimum limits of such insurance
t -----
shall be $500,000/$1,000,000 Bodily In -;u ry; $100,000 Property Damage,
or $1,000,000 combined single limit.
A certificate of said bodily injury and property damage insurance
containing the above -stated required endorsements shall be delivered
to the City Attorney after the issuance of said policy, with satisfac-
tory evidence that each carrier is required to give the City of Lodi
at least 30 days' prior notice of the cancellation or reduction in
coverage of any policy during the effective period of tris Agreement.
D. Engineer shall carry professional liability insurance, in limits not
less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
E. That the Owner will provide, at its own expense, the following items:
1. All maps, drawings, records, data, etc., which are available in
the files of the Owner and which may be useful in the work
involved under this contract.
2. Paying all fees associated with obtaining permits.
3. Any required surveying, field samping and/or laboratory testing
service. Such work to be done by a mutually acceptable indepen-
dent organization specializing in such work. The Engineer will
furnish assistance and guidance for such work. The Engineer will
review the reports furnished as part of such sampling and/or
testing work.
4. Access to public and private property, as necessary, when
required in conduct of field investigations.
F. That the Engineer shall not be liable for delays resulting from causes
beyond the reasonable control of -the Engineer; that the Engineer has
made no warranties, express or implied, which are not expressly set
AlOf4 4 February 10, 1987
forth in the contract; and that under no cirC=StarCers will the
Engineer be liable for indirect or consequential dammages.
G. That the Owner shall have the right to terminate the services of the
Engineer at any time. In case the services of the Engineer are termi-
nated by the Owner, the Engineer shall be paid in accordance with
Section II for all work up to the date of termination.
H. Any failure by Owner or by Engineer at any tire, or from time -to -time,
to enforce any of the terms or conditions ci this contract shall not
constitute a waiver of such terms or conditions, and shall not affect
or impair such terms or conditions in any way, or the right of Owner
or Engineer at any time to avail itself of such remedies as it may
have for any breach of such terms or conditions.
I. This contract is not assignable by either party hereto without the
written consent of the other.
J. This contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and
there are no terms, conditions, or porvisions, either oral or written,
between the parties other than those herein contained or made a part
hereof by reference.
K. Engineer will be responsible for obtaining all approvals and permits.
L. Owner will receive reproducible mylar equivalent of construction
record drawings.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement on the
date first above written.
CITY OF LODI
By
Thomas A. Peterson
BLACK 6 VEATCH, ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS
nenUeLn U.
Regional M
Title:;+.r Marlci(�Pr —
Attest: Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Ronald M. Stein
City Attorney
AlOfS 5 `Febivary 10, 1987
err
APPENDIX A
TO
AGREIENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
WASTEWATER CONSULTING SERVICES
CITY OF LODI
WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES
SCOPE OF WORK
A. PP.ELLx1INARY ENGINEERING
1. Supervise preparation of an EIR and provide supporting engineering
information.
2. Prepare a sludge management plan.
analysis based upon City developed
3. Conduct an effluent disposal
n data and prepare an effluent disposal plan.
effluent utilizatio
t,, Cause to have prepared and supervise the preparation of a soils
investigation.
5, Prepare a detailed design memorandum describing the facilities to
equipment, and operating
be designed, criteria for design, major
modes.
B. DESIGN ENGINEERING
i, Prepare drawings, specifications, and bid documents for the
proposed construction work and for all equipment.
2. Consult with City or other regulatory authorities with .regard to
project elements under their jurisdiction. Furnish•tb the Owner
documents and design data for, and assist in the preparation of,
the required documents so that the Omer may obtain approvals of
such regulatory authorities; and assist in obtaining such
approvals by participating in negotiations with such authorities.
3. Develop refined cost estimates and schedules corresponding to the
design documents.
4. Make periodic visits to the Owner's offices and/or plant site to
coordinate with the Owner's personnel and to review progress.
C. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
AlOg7
I. Assist and advise the Owner in obtaining bids, evaluating bids
received, and awarding contracts.
2. Reproduce drawings, specifications, and bid documents and issue
to the Owner and prospective bidders.
3. Prepare and issue addenda during the bidding period.
4. Prepare conforming copies of contract documents.
5. Review drawings and data (shop drawings) submitted by
construction contractors and vendors for general conformity to
the contract drawings and specifications.
6. Furnish full-time resident project representative and such assis-
tant project representatives as may be required to conduct onsite
observations of general progress of construction activities.
7 February 10, 1987
s'
z
D. START-UP SERVICES
I. Provide start-up assistance for new process units and training
classes as appropriate.
Z. Update 0@4 manuals to reflect the expanded facilities and new
processes.
E. SUPPLE;ENTAL ENGINEERING
Any additional work requested by .he Owner that is necessary to
complete the project.
AlOg8 ,,
ATTAMIENT TO ENGINEERING AGREatENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF LODI
AND
BLACK & VEATCH
DATED
WORK ORDER NO. I
PREL .JINARY ENGINEERING
2. Contract administration - Negotiate and administer_subconti-cts,
prepare monthly payment requests, coordinate contract correspond-
ence, and prepare a monthly project status report.
3. Review meetings - Meet with City staff as necessary to revie-j and
coordinate the overall project. This scope of work provides for
three meetings.
Task 200 - Sludge Management Plan
1. Regulatory agencies._
Contact regulatory agencies to determine disposal
requirements.
}
3
2. Sludge characterization.
a. Process calculations for present and future production.
b. Sludge analysis review.
(I) Review raw, digested, and lagoon sludge data.
(2) Determine Y
suitabilit for disposal alternatives.
(3) Determine impact of lagoon storage on sludge
characteristics.
3. Alternatives analysis.
a. Alternatives development.
(1) Landfill.
(2) Land application.
(a) Liquid.
(b) Dewatered.
(3) Composting.
(a) Lagoon storage/windrow.
(b) Conventional
b. Potential site selection.
(1) Preliminary site identification.
(2) Screening.
(3} Soils testing.
lU
AlOil0 ��
C. Alternatives selection.
(2) Screening.
(2) Present worth analysis.
(3) Recommended piar_.
4. Develop operations plan-
a. Regulatory requirements.
b. Plant operation.
c. Disposal site operation.
(I) Lane{ use.
(2) Site access.
(3) Site closure.
(4) Disposal procedure.
d. Surface runoff and ground water monitors.
e. Record keeping.
5. Prepare sludge management plan report.
A preliminary outline is as follows:
Chapter 2 - Executive Summary
Introduction
Conclusions
Recommendations
Chapter 2 - Introduction
Purpose
Scope
Background
Chapter 3 -- Plant Design and Operation
Existing facilities
Proposed expansion
Chapter 4 - Sludge Quantity and Quality
Sludge production
Sludge quality
Quality parameters and significance
Sludge analyses (raw, digested, lagoon)..
Chapter 5 - Alt'-rnatides Analyses
Alternatives development
Ultimate disposal options
Regulatory considerations
Present and future
Alternatives Description
Landfill disposal
Land application
Composting
§=
Alternatives evaluation
Present worth analysis
Plan selection
6 - Recommended Management Plan
Chapter
Site improvements?
Recommended faciliites
Disposal sites/uses
Preliminary opinion of probable cost
operations plan
Implementation
6, Review meetings. review the
three times to formally
Meet with City staff
study:
alternatives to be investigated.
a. To discuss
liminary alternative analysis results.
b. To review pre
C. To review draft report.
Task 300 - Effluent Disposal Plan
Review city report of existing land operations.
1:
1,
E:
�-a
fes•
12 February 10, 1987
A10i12 -"
2. Alternatives znalySis.
a. Alternatives development.
{i) Direct discharge.
(a) Hyacinth raceway.
(b) 20/20 CHAS design.
(c) Effluent filtration.
(2) Land disposal.
(a) Existing practice.
(b) In excess of 20/20.
b. Alternative selection.
(1) Screening
(2) Present worth analysis.
(3) Recommended plan.
3. Prepare effluent disposal plan.
A preliminary outline is as follows:
Chapter 1 - Executive Summary
Introduction
Conclusions
Recommendations
Chapter 2 - Introduction
Purpose
E
Scope
Background
�
Chapter 3 - Effluent Quantity and Quality
Flow characteristics and projections.
Effluent quality versus discharge requirements
Chapter 4 - Alternatives Analysis
Alternatives development
Direct discharge alternatives
20/20 CMAS design
Effluent filtration
Hyacinth raceway t
Land disposal -alternatives.
20/20 or greater
Current operations
Alternatives evaluation
Screening/description
Present worth Recommended plan
Description
Probable cost
Implementation
4. Review meetings.
Meet with City staff three times to formally review the
study:
a. To discuss alternatives to be investigated
b. To review preliminary alternative analysis results.
C. To review draft report.
Task 400 - EIR Administration
1. Administer the EIR consultant contract.
2. Provide required input to the EIR process.
Task 500 - Geotechnical Investigation
1. Phase A - Construction site subsurface investigation and review
of previous reports.
a. Four soil borings.
b. Review of previous reports and geotechnical data.
C. Report comparing soil boring data with previous
geotechnical information.
2. Phase B - Construction site geotechnical investigation report.
a. Laboratory testing of selected soil samples.
b. Geotechnical engineering analysis of data obtained and/or
previously reviewed.
C. Report preparation.
_'. Phase C - Siudge disposal site investirat_on and report
a. tour soil borings.
b. Review of previous. teports and geotechnical data.
C. Laboratory testing of surface sail samples (pH and CEC).
d. Report summarizing data collected and findings.
Task 600 - Design Memorandum
1. Finalize design loads and criteria.
a. Liquids processing.
b. Solids processing.
2. Finalize process calculations.
a. Liquids processing.
b. Solids processing.
C. Pilot study data review.
d. Diffuser cost-effectiveness analysis.
3. Detailed hydraulic calculations (hydraulic profile),
4. Process schematics.
a. Liquids
b. Solids
C. F3eat loop.
d. Gas schematic.
C. C12/SO2 schematic.
5. Site plan.
6. Major equipment selection.
7. Preliminary process and instrumentation diagram (P&ID).
Al0ii5 �.-
15
O. Seaport memoranda.
a. Struct,iral.
b. Electrical.
C. HVAC.
d. Drafting.
9. Administrative information
a. Sheet list.
b. Spec outline.
C. Probable cost.
d. Project schedule.
10. Memo production.
11. Quality control review.
Time for Completion
From the date of authorization to proceed, time to complete the preliminary
engineering phase is 450 calendar days.
Compensation, and Payment
Compensation shall be based as provided for in Section II of the agreement.
The cost for the work is $120,411 and the fixed fee is $18,062, with a
total price of $138,473.
Details of the cost estimate are summarized in Attachments I and 2 to this
work order.
Effective Date
This work order shall be authorized on the last date executed by the
parties signing below.
Date Z -A9-9
Date February 18, 1987
BLACK: & VEATCH, ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS
B
Kenneth D. Sone
Regional Manag r
City of Lodi
By
_�� Peterson
Title UlIcY i ger
Attest:
Alice M. Reinche
City Clerk
_
Ci2Y
Cz LOGS
_.<
Esƒ!9&TE
z
WORE ITeI
CIOL
-
ELECT.
STRUC.
DPT.
R.
FT ;
PE
SE
PE SE
RE
SE
TASK 100
101
!2?
9
0
: 0
0
0
0
:2
. 10 2
6o
0
@
o 0
0
0
o
e
0
---
To:a!
J. -1o
0
0
o e
a
0
0
z2
TASK 20G
. 201
2
40
0
0 0
0
0
o
S
0
0
0
204
0
lQ
Se
o 0
0
0
0
0
los
4
20
40
- 0
0
0
C.
!G
2§e
6
6
0
0 0
0
0
0
2
Tola�
20
12P
IGa
0 Cl
0
0
TASK SG0
: q\ ?ol
0
8
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
~ SO 2
z
20
Eo
0 o
0
0
0
0
} ?o?
\
IS
s0
0 0
0
0
ae
10
} 30 4
@
6
0
o O
0
0
0
2
Torai
17-14a
eo
o
) T&SE 400
401
#0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0.
o
§0 2
4
40
Cl
0 0
0
0
0
0
\ Tota!
\\
1-0
0
Cl 0
0
0
0
0
\ TAsK 50o
see
Task Ido
TASK Goo
GO
2
G
24
0 0
0
0
as
0
\ §e 2
8
10
SS
0 0
0
0
0
0
§oa
4
S
2-
0 0
0
0
24
0
\ 604
12
32
100
S 0
G
e
£O
o
\ : GOS
5
10
a2
0 O
0
0
12
0
6 0 C
6
12
40
0 0
0
0
0
4
Got
8
16
So
So 24
O
o
24
2
G08
2
4
8
40 a6
. 28
40
12
12
GOe
4
10
40
C, 20
4
15
0
G
610
12
S
110
2 4
0
0
16
20
611
1G
16
0
12 0
_
0
0
2
\\ \ Total
2a
154
47o
ee e4
#§
5G
178
46
Rat�zhr
fa0
$25
790
725 «20
22
+18
$1a
«!!
DIRECT
BOR
«0,2o S
CITY OF LOD! \
&T2&CHENT z TO WORK ORDER NO. i
'
Direct
COST
SIMARY
Total
Direct Expenses
Expenses
Expenses
,
100
SG,462
Task
subs.
Comput.
Travel
Printing
Misc.
100
so
S80
so
S50
SM.
200
«0
1120
5200
2,900
1100
aoo
so
1100
2250
3500
!s0
400
so
so
so
&25
-2_
500
7,000
to
so
so
I/
60^
so
5250
so
!1,200
1800
Total
&2.000
2580
1450
$2,675
11,425
Task
Direct
!ndrect
Direct
Total
Labor
Expenses
Expenses
Costs
100
SG,462
15,401
EG30
«15,4)5
200
IS, 708
511,520
11,&50
121/s28
300
14,262
!6,125
1600
111,860
400
!2,320
+5,016
S50
15,3SE
500
£o
so
17,000
±2,000
600
124,502
!32,242
12,250
■5),255
Tolal 547,052 761,174 II2l180 ±120.411
Fixed Pee +18.062
Total Cost 1136,473
CIT: OF LODI ;
ATTACp,.1ENT 3 TO WORK ORDER N0. 1
BASIS FOR ESTi.*LaTING !LMN-HOURS
Task 100 - Project Adminis on
1. Work schedule 2 hr/wk x 64 wks 128 hr PM
36 hr Typing
2. Contract administration 4 hr/mo x 15 mo 60 lir PM
8 hr Typing
3, Review meetings
3 mtgs @ 4 hr 12 hr E-1
2 hr Typing
Tas� 200 - Sludge yanac_ement Plan
1. Regulatory agency contact
Five agencies @ 8 hr each
40 hr
PE
8 hr
Tvping
2. Sludge characterization
4 hr
PE
3 hr
SE
3. Alternative analysis
a. Alternatives development
Five alternatives @ 4 hr each PE
20 hr
PE
and 8 hr each SE
40 hr
SE
12 hr
Drafting
6 hr
Typing
b. Site selection
Three sites @ 4 hr each PE
12 hr
PE
and @ 8 hr each SE
24 hr
SE
C. Alternatives analysis
Five alternatives @ 2 hr each PE
10 hr
PE
and 4 hr each SE
20 hr
SE
4, Operational plan
_
16 hr
PE
36 hr
SE
5. Report preparation
Assume 10 figures @ 8._hr
Assume 48 • ;es @ 20 n4_a/page
6. Meetings
Three @ 2 hr each for N S PE
7. Miscellaneous
P4 @ 11% Cf PF.
Task 300 - Effluent Analysis
— Review City report
2. Alternatives analysis
Five alternatives @ 4 hr each PE
and 12 hr each SE
3. Report preparation
Assume 12 figures @ 8 hr
Assume 30 pages @ 20 min/page
4. Meetings
3 @ 2 hr each for PM and PE
5. Miscellaneous
PM @ 14% of PE
Task 400 - EIR Administration
1. Consultant coordination.
1 hr/wk for 10 mos
2: Provide technical input
P60s2
2
20 'hr PE
40 hr SE
80 hr Drafting
16 hr Typing
6 hr PH
6 hr PE
2 hr Typing
14 'hr Pill
8 hr PE
20 hr
PE
60 hr
SE
J
15 hr
PE
30 hr
SE
96 hr
Drafting
10 hr
Typing
6 hr
PM
6 hA
PE
F
2 hr
Typing:
a
6 hr
PM
1
40 hr
Pa
k'
4 hr
PH
40 hr
PE
F.
`4
d
7
t.
February 10,
1987
Task 500 - Soils Report
(B&V time included under Task 100)
Task 600 - Predesign Memorandum
Base estimate on other recent projects (direct labor only):
Burlingame $6 million and $24,600
Gresham $12 million and $30,000
Vancouver $4.5 million and $20,000
Lodi @ $6.1 million = $25,000
J. H. KLEINFELDER & ASSOCIATES
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS - MATERIALS TESTING
LAND & NATER RESOURCES
1815 EAST VIRTU STREET .
STOCKTON. CALIFORNIA 45205
0091 R48•1335
PS -86-072
November 18, 1986
Black & Veatch
3470 Buskirk Avenue
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Subject: PROPOSAL
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED 1WHITE SLOUGH WATER POLLUTION
CONTROL FACILITY/LODI, CA
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to present this proposal for performing a geotechnical
investigation at the site of the proposed expansion of White Slough Water
Pollution Control Facility in Lodi, California. It is our understanding that
the construction will include additions to disinfection, primary and secondary
sedimentation, gravity thickener, anerobic digestion, and activated sludge
areas.
Additional details of the planned construction are not known to our firm at
this tirre.
PURPOSES AND SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION
The purposes of our geotechnical investigation will be to explore and eva-
luate the surface and subsurface soils at the site in three phases. Phase A
will include field exploration at the proposed four boring locations identified
by representatives of Black &, Veatch. The depths of the borings will vary from
approximately 15 to 20 feet below the present ground surface. A representative
of J. H. Kieinfelder & Associates will maintain a log of the soils encountered
in the borings and obtain samples for visual examination, classification, and
laboratory testing.
g
I
A
). H_ KLEINFELDER & ASSOCIATES PS -8o-072
November 18, 1986
Page Two
A review of existing geotechnical reports and geologic and seismic infor-
mation for the area will be included in this phase. A letter report will be
submitted to comparing current boring information and existing geotechnical
reports.
Phase B will include a laboratory investigation and engineering analyses
will be summarized in a written report.
Laboratory tests will be performed on selected core samples to evaluate the
strength, density, compressibility, gradation, and corrosion characteristics of
the materials encountered. At this time we anticipate that the report will
include the following items:
1. Plot plan and vicinity map showing the approximate
locations of the site and test borings drilled for
this study.
2. Logs of Borings.
3. Results of all laboratory tests.
4. Recommended type and depth of foundations, including
recommended soil bearing and lateral earth pressures.
5. Recommended site preparation and grading.
&. Recommended support of slab -on -grade floors.
7. Recommended pavement sections.
8. Comments on seismic design.
9. Comments on groundwater.
10. Comments on corrosion.
11. Comments on quality control.
Phase C is to include a field and laboratory investigation for the proposed
sewage sludge land spreading site. There are four exploratory borings to depths
approximately 15 to 20 feet below site grade proposed for Phase C. Laboratory
testing is to include soil pH and cation exchange capacity, and strength tests.
A letter report summarizing the information from the field and laboratory and
comparing to existing geotechnical reports will be provided.
V'
`'H_KLEiNFHDER & ASSGCIATES
FEE ARRANGEMENTS
PS -&6-072
November 13, '1936
Page Three
We propose to perform these services on a lump sum basis. For the scope of
work outlined above, our fees for each phase are:
Phase A - $2,300
Phase B - $2,600
Phase C - $2,100
If weather, access, or site conditions restrict our field operations, we
may need to revise our estimate. We would contact you for authorization,
however, before proceeding with any alditionai work.
SCHEDULE
We are in a position to begin on this project within approximately one week
following our notice to proceed. We will make our verbal recommendations
available to your engineer as soon as they are available from the field or
laboratory and follow with a report within approximately two weeks after each
phase has been started.
AUTHORIZATION
Attached to this proposal is our firm's standard form of agreement. A
signed and returned copy of this contract agreement can serve as our firm's for-
mal authorization to proceed on this project.
We thank you for the opportunity of presenting this proposal for con-
sideration. If you have any questions or require additional information, please
contact us.
LAC:rls
P9/Attachment
.:y
very truly yours,
J. H. KLEINFELDER & ASSOCIATES
Lloyd Crask, C. E.
Senior Engineer
Stockton Regional Office