HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 18, 1981 (52)S. s e �; •," r -A s - It �!' i fr}-r '� a .� kt+a Y ,: ����a _^� s � z a t ' t �e i w �
F 3Y� {`L 5
- i.
# Y {} ` j= l7■ �rJ t} a b 3 i iT
- - � e` � } 3 'be�.����j�
��•r�f
��„�Y.� 1'! X57
� T 'u•:t n•
Ta
}���'lllr2��PAM
- � H y�-- C / � ..fi kyr sp ��''r! t r • s p ``
� � � A� .4�� y � 4 _ { ��. } •�1�+ ; 1 \ •, a �' 1�^ .j �.Yyf f� .�^�%S�Se-i ; i� � was � \ T,1 �
�s'�a
.$ rr
..�s x t - ` -- > 3 4• : " Z -'A �� - _. 1� y} j �, r ,n:
� f
5 ��J'a ffH t li i �
l � r S �1y hAx-iy y�:
P y 4 ,5 '_ T 1 R' f "h • � ... ..f T- � � JJv���WJ
f
�S 7f r•�+. 'G -w ?'. k
_ „r i
'i�♦ a.�A _ n
t F
CITY COUNCIL
PALTER KATNICH, Mayof
)AMPS A. WCARTY, Mayo- Pr® Tem
RICHARD L. HUGHES
ROBERT G. MURPt-tY
"ES W. PINKERTON, )r.
CITY HALL, 229 WEST PINE SUM
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95240
(209) 334-5634
February 20, 1981
Mr. Al Fl_or
Assistant County Clerk
222 E. Weber, Froom 343
Stockton, CA 95202
Dear Mr. Flora
HENRY A. CLAVES, )e.
City managet
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
RONALD M. STEIN
City Attorney
Confirming our telephone conversation of this
date, the Lodi City Council by motion action
taken at a regular meeting held February 1B,
1981, approved the City®s participation in the
county -wide automated warrant system.
Should you have any questions concerning this
action, please do not hesitator to call this
office®
Very truly yours,
0 a �
Alice MyFteimc e
City Clerk
cc, Joy Hold.
I
POUCK DIPAUMEW
230 WEST ELM STREET
tOD1. CALIFORNIA 93248
ON) 3611-D616
HMXY A. AAM
Cav moftqw January 19, 1981
To, Henry A. Glaves, City Manager
From: Marc Yates, Chief of Police
Subject: Implementation of County -Wide
Automated Warrant System
(D
MARC YATES
Chief of POIKO
For the past several years the County has been working on implementing a
county wide warrant system. All police agencies in the County with the
exception of Lodi have formally acknowledged, by written communication,
their Intent to be a part o9 this system. Prior to this, I am seeking
your support and direction as there wi11 be an Initial cost of about
one hundred dollars and a monthly cost of approximately seventy six dollars,
The projected date of implementation however is not until at least May of
this year. As Indicated in the attached report from Mrs. Holm, It will
allow us to utilize much of one clerk's effort toward other demands with-
in the department.
MY : j km
enc I.
• max_: ,, �__� ��WW��,.,..���:..:_°, _ .. .��-�� . �.�; . _ e.�.�... .
L O D i P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T
M e m o r a n d u m
To: Marc Yates, Chief of Police
From: Joy A. Holm, Administrative Assistant
Date: January 16, 1981
Subject: implementation of County Wide Automated Warrant System
A county -wide warrant system to provide an automated repository for arrest
warrants has been developed by the County Clerk's Office and the County Data
Processing staff, This project primarily funded through an LEAA Grant is
available to all courts and law enforcement agencies in San Joaquin County,
The County --Wide Warrant System is to provide for a logical and systematic
flow of everts from the input of the warrant, through storage and random
accessing, and finally to the clearance of the warrant. The basic components
of the system include the following:
On-line input of local and foreign warrants,
o On-line inquiry capability .
o On-line control and issuance of abstracts.
s Maintenance of records for attempted service.
® Off-line reports of warrants,
® Statistical reporting.
* Clearance of warrant.
Most counties that have implemented automated warrant systems have increased
arrests and as a result increased revenues from fines. In some instances the
increase in revenues has more than paid for the cost of the system.
The current manual system is operated by the San Joaquin County courts sending
warrants to our records section for processing and control. Additional warrants
are received by our department from agencies out of San Joaquin County. Card
indexes, a control log, and tub files are created by our records section for
access and control.
..continued..
Marc Yates, Chief of Po ce
January 16, 1381 t...
a �.rounty Wide Automated Warrant System
Page 2
Entering San Joaquin County warrants in .he automated system would be the respon-
sibility of the courts. The processing of out of county orforeign warrants would
still be the police department's responsibility. We would have the option of en-
tering these warrants in the automated system or continuing with the manual
system. Approximately ten percent of the 1,035 warrants in our current file are
in this category.
Each sc-een or transaction will cost three cents, with the initial entering of a
warrant requiring two screens or six cents. Since the Issuing courts will be en-
tering the warrants, they will pay this cost. Our costs will be determined by the
foreign warrants we enter plus other transactions. Following is a breakdown of
estimated cost per month:
Transactions
Enter Foreign Warrants
inquiries
Attempted Service Update
Abstracts
Other Misc. Entries
�Quantity
Cost
15
b .90
2,000
60.00
400
12.00
too
3.00
100
3.00
S 76.90
An additional cost for entering the backlog of warrants in our file would be
approximately $100.00. This cost could be more than justified by the elimination
of maintaining both the manual and automated systems for an extended period. We
have one clerk in the records section whose primary responsibility is warrants.
With the implementation of the automated system, she will only be required to
control foreign warrants and enter miscellaneous enteries into the system. This
would provide more of her time for entering case reports and activity cards into
the daily system as well as assisting with other clerical duties in the records
section.
As of this date all other agencies with the exception of Lodi have indicated In
writing that they wilt participate in this system. The County Administrator's
Office has requested we respond in writing at the earliest possible date so that
final schedules and implementation dates can be set. Mir. Robert Wright, Senior
Deputy County Administrator, has stated it would probably be April or May, 1981
before final implementation.
Respectfully submitted,
��.4 f
Joy A m
Admii�ist' Live Assistant
J All: j km