Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 18, 1981 (52)S. s e �; •," r -A s - It �!' i fr}-r '� a .� kt+a Y ,: ����a _^� s � z a t ' t �e i w � F 3Y� {`L 5 - i. # Y {} ` j= l7■ �rJ t} a b 3 i iT - - � e` � } 3 'be�.����j� ��•r�f ��„�Y.� 1'! X57 � T 'u•:t n• Ta }���'lllr2��PAM - � H y�-- C / � ..fi kyr sp ��''r! t r • s p `` � � � A� .4�� y � 4 _ { ��. } •�1�+ ; 1 \ •, a �' 1�^ .j �.Yyf f� .�^�%S�Se-i ; i� � was � \ T,1 � �s'�a .$ rr ..�s x t - ` -- > 3 4• : " Z -'A �� - _. 1� y} j �, r ,n: � f 5 ��J'a ffH t li i � l � r S �1y hAx-iy y�: P y 4 ,5 '_ T 1 R' f "h • � ... ..f T- � � JJv���WJ f �S 7f r•�+. 'G -w ?'. k _ „r i 'i�♦ a.�A _ n t F CITY COUNCIL PALTER KATNICH, Mayof )AMPS A. WCARTY, Mayo- Pr® Tem RICHARD L. HUGHES ROBERT G. MURPt-tY "ES W. PINKERTON, )r. CITY HALL, 229 WEST PINE SUM LODI, CALIFORNIA 95240 (209) 334-5634 February 20, 1981 Mr. Al Fl_or Assistant County Clerk 222 E. Weber, Froom 343 Stockton, CA 95202 Dear Mr. Flora HENRY A. CLAVES, )e. City managet ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk RONALD M. STEIN City Attorney Confirming our telephone conversation of this date, the Lodi City Council by motion action taken at a regular meeting held February 1B, 1981, approved the City®s participation in the county -wide automated warrant system. Should you have any questions concerning this action, please do not hesitator to call this office® Very truly yours, 0 a � Alice MyFteimc e City Clerk cc, Joy Hold. I POUCK DIPAUMEW 230 WEST ELM STREET tOD1. CALIFORNIA 93248 ON) 3611-D616 HMXY A. AAM Cav moftqw January 19, 1981 To, Henry A. Glaves, City Manager From: Marc Yates, Chief of Police Subject: Implementation of County -Wide Automated Warrant System (D MARC YATES Chief of POIKO For the past several years the County has been working on implementing a county wide warrant system. All police agencies in the County with the exception of Lodi have formally acknowledged, by written communication, their Intent to be a part o9 this system. Prior to this, I am seeking your support and direction as there wi11 be an Initial cost of about one hundred dollars and a monthly cost of approximately seventy six dollars, The projected date of implementation however is not until at least May of this year. As Indicated in the attached report from Mrs. Holm, It will allow us to utilize much of one clerk's effort toward other demands with- in the department. MY : j km enc I. • max_: ,, �__� ��WW��,.,..���:..:_°, _ .. .��-�� . �.�; . _ e.�.�... . L O D i P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T M e m o r a n d u m To: Marc Yates, Chief of Police From: Joy A. Holm, Administrative Assistant Date: January 16, 1981 Subject: implementation of County Wide Automated Warrant System A county -wide warrant system to provide an automated repository for arrest warrants has been developed by the County Clerk's Office and the County Data Processing staff, This project primarily funded through an LEAA Grant is available to all courts and law enforcement agencies in San Joaquin County, The County --Wide Warrant System is to provide for a logical and systematic flow of everts from the input of the warrant, through storage and random accessing, and finally to the clearance of the warrant. The basic components of the system include the following: On-line input of local and foreign warrants, o On-line inquiry capability . o On-line control and issuance of abstracts. s Maintenance of records for attempted service. ® Off-line reports of warrants, ® Statistical reporting. * Clearance of warrant. Most counties that have implemented automated warrant systems have increased arrests and as a result increased revenues from fines. In some instances the increase in revenues has more than paid for the cost of the system. The current manual system is operated by the San Joaquin County courts sending warrants to our records section for processing and control. Additional warrants are received by our department from agencies out of San Joaquin County. Card indexes, a control log, and tub files are created by our records section for access and control. ..continued.. Marc Yates, Chief of Po ce January 16, 1381 t... a �.rounty Wide Automated Warrant System Page 2 Entering San Joaquin County warrants in .he automated system would be the respon- sibility of the courts. The processing of out of county orforeign warrants would still be the police department's responsibility. We would have the option of en- tering these warrants in the automated system or continuing with the manual system. Approximately ten percent of the 1,035 warrants in our current file are in this category. Each sc-een or transaction will cost three cents, with the initial entering of a warrant requiring two screens or six cents. Since the Issuing courts will be en- tering the warrants, they will pay this cost. Our costs will be determined by the foreign warrants we enter plus other transactions. Following is a breakdown of estimated cost per month: Transactions Enter Foreign Warrants inquiries Attempted Service Update Abstracts Other Misc. Entries �Quantity Cost 15 b .90 2,000 60.00 400 12.00 too 3.00 100 3.00 S 76.90 An additional cost for entering the backlog of warrants in our file would be approximately $100.00. This cost could be more than justified by the elimination of maintaining both the manual and automated systems for an extended period. We have one clerk in the records section whose primary responsibility is warrants. With the implementation of the automated system, she will only be required to control foreign warrants and enter miscellaneous enteries into the system. This would provide more of her time for entering case reports and activity cards into the daily system as well as assisting with other clerical duties in the records section. As of this date all other agencies with the exception of Lodi have indicated In writing that they wilt participate in this system. The County Administrator's Office has requested we respond in writing at the earliest possible date so that final schedules and implementation dates can be set. Mir. Robert Wright, Senior Deputy County Administrator, has stated it would probably be April or May, 1981 before final implementation. Respectfully submitted, ��.4 f Joy A m Admii�ist' Live Assistant J All: j km