HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 4, 1981 (37)U
MEMORANDUM, CITY OF LODI, Community Development Department
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE- JANUARY 26, 1 g8 1
SUBJECT: BATCH REORGANIZATION DENIAL
INTRODUCTION. At the last City Council meeting Councilman James McCarty
asked our office to prepare a report concerning the denial of the Batch
Reorganization (i.e. Annexation) by the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO). At the meeting we indicated that the minutes of the LAFCO
hearing would also be available for Council perusal. however, LAFCO
Executive Officer, Jerry Scott, indicates that the Minutes would not
reveal all of the statements. He has provided the City Clerk with t;)e
tapes of the session, if a Councilman or other persons wishes to
review them.
HEARING DATA. Although the motion for denial contains no findings, a
number of statements were made by LAFCO members which the City Council
may wish to hear. Even though the area west of Lower Sacramento. Road
has been shown for development on the General Plan since 1962 and four
annexations (i.e. Mom Addition - October, 1966; Towne Addition - June, 1972;
Temple Baptist Church Addition - August, 1976; and Kennedy -Taylor -
September, 1978) have previously been approved by LAFCO in that area,
certain commission members felt that that major thoroughfare was a natural
western boundary for the City of Lodi.
One LAFCO member stated that no annexations to Lodi should be approved
until after the electorate had an opportunity to vote on one or both of the
growth initiatives presently being circulated in the City.
Although it was stated by both City Staff and the applicant's attorney that
there was no development proposed for the Batch property at present, LAFCO
members were concerned that the City was not doing enough to alleviate the
over' -crowding being faced by the Lodi Unified School District.
As the Council is aware, the Batch Reorganization contained both the Robert
Batch property west of Lower Sacramento Road and the Martha Hills property
east of the road. The Mills property was being forced into the City in
accordance with LAFCO policy and past actions of that agency. LAFCO member
Wilhort stated that he felt the forcing of property into a city was uncon-
stitutional.
2.
PERSON SPEAKING ilk OPPOSITION.
1. Air, Wilbert Ruhl, Rural Land Owners Association
3933 Cast Almond Drive, Lodi
2, Mrs. Ann Johnson, Lodi unified School District
815 lest Lockeford Street Lodi
3. Mr. Michael Machado, Peoples Organization for
Land Preservation
Linden, CA
4. Dr. Doris Marenco, 605 No Madison
Stockton, CA
5. Mr. Mills, Attorney at Law for his Mother
Mrs. Martha Mills
2401 West Lodi Avenue, Lodi
COUNTY COURTHOUSE. ROOM IS3
° 222 EAST WEDER AVRNUE
STOCKTON. CALIFORNIA 95202
PHONE: 209/944.919
.January 20, 1981
Lodi City Council
C/o City Cleric
221. W. fine
Lodi, CA 9524.0
EXECUTIVE 04rFICER
GERALD F. SCOTT
LROAL COUNf@It.
MICHAEL MCGRXW
DHPUYY COUMYY C0VNR8L
COMMII98I01e M&MRB 148
$5040914T A. CAMCLIN1. CNAIR44AN
TRACT CIV• COUNCILMAW
D*VOLASS W. WILMOIT. V*e6R CMAIpiOAYa
9NF8 EI70YWte? BIIPBAVISOR
610"9 L. @A*92W
6TN 11I$taiO4 $Vpel1V1"A
HADWL0 W. M96AOH
6VWLIO MRM®Rk
Al NO" 1. RUR
BTOCIiTON CITY COUNCILMAN
OVANLRV NCM'MN*M, ALT811NATR
►U4LIR L949498R
JACK C. RNYo4a, ALT9R64AT8
mANT8CA CITY COVMCILMAN
MIC14ARD U. V09MIKAWA. ALTBWMATH
167 V18TWiCT 9UNIAWMOR
Ret Resolution leo. 493 Disapproving the Batch Reorganization (LAFC 27-80)
Including Annexation to the City of Lodi and Detachment From the
Woodbridge Rural County Fire Protection District and the Woodbridge
Water Users Conservation District®
Gentlemen:
We hereby transmit a certified copy of this Commission's Resolution No. 493
disapproving the above entitled proposal and directing the City of Lodi to
abandon all farther proceedings.
Very truly yours,
44,
ALD F. Off'
Executive Officer
GFSttp
cc: Board of Supervisors c/o Clerk of the Board
Woodbridge Rural County Fire Protection District
Woodbridge :dater Users Conservation District
County Surveyor
County Assessor
Robert, Batch
James Schroeder
Lodi Unified School. District
Woodbridge irrigation District.
RESOLUTION NO. 493
BEFORE THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE BATCH REORGANIZATION (%AFC 27®80)
INCLUDING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI AND DETACHMENT
FROM THE W ODBRIDGE RURAL. COUNTY FIRS PROTECTION DIS'T'RICT AND
THE WOODBRIDGE WATER USERS CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, --the above entitled proposal was initiated by resolution of the
City of Lodi, and on December 17, 1980, the Executive Officer certified the
application filed for processing in accordance with the District Reorganization
Act-, and,
WHEREAS, the Commission held a public hearing on the proposed reorganization
on January 16, 1981, in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, County Courthouse,
pursuant to notice of hearing which was published, posted and mailed in accordance
with State law, and,
WHEREAS, at said hearing the Cor=ission heard and received evidence, both
oral and documentary, submitted in favor of and in opposition to the proposed
annexation and all persons present were given an opportunity to hear and be
heard in respect to any matter relating to said proposal;
NOV, THEREFORE, the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Joaquin County_
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER as follows:
Section 1. The proposed Batch Reorganization is hereby disapproved and
all further proceeding are to be abandoned.
Section 2. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to
wail and file certified copies of this resolution as required by Section
56272 of the Government Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of January, 1980, by the following vote
of the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Joaquin County, to reit.
AYES: Commisaiouers Barber, N4eison, :tue, Wilhoit and Cancliri
NOES: None
THE FORVOING IS A CO .'ECF COPY 0.
THE 01111,1.1.01 FI .-: 11 M S OFF,CE o
' GE A>'rU F. SCOTT 9ha=rnm,,nEXICUIIVEOFF.CER ROBERT A> CANCLrNI, �
Local Agency Formation Commission
By. �i nL(�t rp of San Joaquin County
COMMISSION CLERK
nate: I -U - F/
MEMORANDUM, CITY OF LOD1, Community Development Department
TO- CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE- JANUARY 26, 1981
SUBJECT. BATCH REORGANIZATION DENIAL
INTRODUCTION. At the last City Council meeting Councilman James McCarty
as_ed au_r____oTftce to prepare a report concerning the dental of the Batch
Reorganization (i.e. Annexation) by the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO). At the meeting we indicated that the minutes of the LAFCO
hearing would also be available for Council perusal. However, LAFCO
Executive Officer, Jerry Scott, indicates that the Minutes would not
reveal all of the statements. He has provided the City Clerk with the
tapes of the session, if a Councilman or other persons wishes to
review them.
HEARING DATA. Although the motion for denial contains no findings, a
number of statements were made by LAFCO members which the City Council
may wish to hear. Even though the area west of Lower Sacramento Road
has been shown for development on the General Plan since 1962 and four
annexations (i.e. Hom Addition - October, 1966; Towne Addition - June, 1972;
Temple Baptist Church Addition - August, 1976; and Kennedy -Taylor
September, 1978) have previously been approved by LAFCO in that area,
certain commission members felt that that major thoroughfare was a natural
western boundary for the City of Leldi.
One LAFCO member stated that no annexations to Lodi should be approved
until after the electorate had an opportunity to vote on one or both of the
growth inl'tiatives presently being circulated in the City.
Although it was stated by both City Staff and the applicantts attorney that
there was no development proposed for the Batch property at present, LAFC®
members were concerned that the City was not doing enough to alleviate the
over --crowding being faced by the Lodi Unified School District®
As the Council is aware, the Batch Reorganization contained both the Robert
Batch property west of Lower Sacramento Road and the Martha Mills property
east of the road. The Pulls property was being forced into the City to .
accordance with LAFCO policy and past actions of that agency. LAFCO member
Wiihort stated that he felt the forcing of property into a city was uncon-
stitutional.
o- .
PERSON SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION.
1, Mr. Wilbert Ruhl, Rural Land Owners Association
3933 East Almond Drive, Lodi
2. Mrs. Ann Johnson., Lodi Unified School District
815 West Lockeford Street Lodi
3. Mr. Michael Machado, Peoples Organization for
Land Preservation
Linden, CA
. Ar. Doris Marenco, 605 N. Madison
Stoekton, CA
5. lore Mills, Attorney at Law for his Mother
Mrs. Martha Mills
2401 West Lodi Avenue, Lodi
E