HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 3, 1982 (33)On motion of Councilman Wghes, Murphy second, Council
denied the Claim filed on behalf of Lina
o R. L. Kautz and
and referred same b Company, the MAinge4v
City's contract administrator.
'77
7.
s'
MWIX14
eViik
Nk.
a
tip
x
W
V".
jM
--wax
QYM
„HANNA,.
oAKtM1t?r cALNQRA4A s�t1:
-mo Ma�►own. snas�sm
- MMOIq op.” 1M•ettMe
201 Ai opt0p�. ...
eelpt. L. 1MCMMfrC
"*OAK M. TQle1e.'.
MM1/ a untwA
eonew w lev.oel•
MTbt e i *at"
Vol," a~ Arp/eeA
atMM A. 41ApT
pl5ewt L
1Rtst10.-CALIFORNIA %7121
sm MOO CM9111-80~9
P.O. Wt 7717 t9s1151
a" -46&9m
4w000 L ee►40ea
*tent ON 0.00-W
aeetsll. a, teeA:e
awneer e. T"00"
TWACf S. -19444
:.eaR A. 001461.10011
tAstlosnay. eALsoiet" 2791
70o NMF sT"19-10A0. -sum M
V. O. tat 1101! to"")
n"5 . ar7-aan
mr w Somme
atpuael I. poem"
e .Aro•n••r •.w•w+.
City of Lodi., California
221 West Pine -Street
Lodi, California 9LS240
ATTENTION; ALICE-'.REIMCHE, CITY CLERK
RE-: 11ND& UMS=INGER V -S. UNITED BROADCASTING
CLM# 6900 C 003638-00-6
Dear Ms • Resiche:
We represent, 'United States Fidelity $ Guaranty regarding
the above-encaptioned matter.. We filed our own separate and
distinct claim on Sepptember 28, 1981 as a result of this
incident. However,: in response to our claim, you sent us a
copy of the denial of Mrs. Krutsinger's claim, said denial dated
September 24, 1981.
In order to correctly fulfill all requirements of the
claims statutes, we believe it is necessary that our separate
and distinct claim be presented to the City of Lodi for what-
ever action the City Council deems appropriate.
If you have any questions in regard to this course of
action, please do not hesitate to communicate with our office.
Thank you for your attention.
Very ly yours,
DTI C S S.
B AVAGE
MSB/ngb
FEB 2 W2
LAW orncEs of
}; MAC.LEAN, MC ALEER
PBAHjENSEN �---'�
SAN "Umle mo. cA w"oeM "101
Mi suit " smm. SUIT[ 700
-4 . 04s.t110
94wo 1. *an"
1AaM14910106 CALWO01694 90M
etewr-a.-"*
/, sa ll ft owns
-at1t.T a6 viefte a•
•
aA/e��
P. 0. Wt Plows?
.
Nt . 929.1411
"C"Aft 0. LMt•
p4•etW 0. at•lttop•
10 0. MOM[•
eoll to •. per', L,.•
rQwAae C. Ws.""
hers C. aowao•
C&OLtee J. ewe•
WeA►e u. ette.ateT•
upon" a.-aftow
JApta R Owl+e41�
seem, .0. t,yp'
ooea W R.. people.
Jom* e. 9►Aai•
J"M L. ale
e. 4100110111 saw*
"Ieft"t L MN•
a"" a. e..ee•• 0. w r......
aA.KS L wasee,"o
SANTA *ftk CALI►ORNtA 15494 -
e.opAti e. M/AWOL
100 COtttct ATTUNE
Lara twl�wl
epwa tLLtR fa1LtMOa
101 .t1a$l11
5AU JOst. t'ALW. 10012164622rape
C. o"Lt.•
1971 TM[ ALILeattM
401[•7 S. RAW
aat . a1t7aa
e.LLuu 0. aA•MA
JtwT a. Peale -an*
"A.tlw L "tow&ttw•
RMY To-SACMNUNTO OFFICE
eALT NL+Aeif
tawq & OP64PAM U-
January 28, 19'82
Rtoo##ML altwcwnH►°vww
OWWW. VI
"'"`; I`°a.,t`"
1"440 V. 1 t&A.M*.
w rat ..sAL4ra
MICM.tL. P. rroq
City of Lodi., California
221 West Pine -Street
Lodi, California 9LS240
ATTENTION; ALICE-'.REIMCHE, CITY CLERK
RE-: 11ND& UMS=INGER V -S. UNITED BROADCASTING
CLM# 6900 C 003638-00-6
Dear Ms • Resiche:
We represent, 'United States Fidelity $ Guaranty regarding
the above-encaptioned matter.. We filed our own separate and
distinct claim on Sepptember 28, 1981 as a result of this
incident. However,: in response to our claim, you sent us a
copy of the denial of Mrs. Krutsinger's claim, said denial dated
September 24, 1981.
In order to correctly fulfill all requirements of the
claims statutes, we believe it is necessary that our separate
and distinct claim be presented to the City of Lodi for what-
ever action the City Council deems appropriate.
If you have any questions in regard to this course of
action, please do not hesitate to communicate with our office.
Thank you for your attention.
Very ly yours,
DTI C S S.
B AVAGE
MSB/ngb
FEB 2 W2