The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - January 15, 1986 (80)� �n � "' � 2bM1�.:"•' � 1 MINN UNM a=001. .-.. AV�RD - ASPHALT .'.t+.G�TLaRTAT S 86-02 City Manager Peterson presented a breakdown of bids that RES. NO. had been received for Asphalt materials at tl the b half of fiscal year 1985-66 explaining f CG I specs called for bids as follows: ITEM No. 1 s Dense Grade Asphalt Concrete, Type B 3/8". Asphalt binder shall be Viscosity Grade AR -4000 Paving Asphalt. A - F.O. B. Plant (500 Tons) B - Stockpile City Limits (100 Tons) _ C - Hopper of Paver (300 Tons) E r ITE24 NO. 2 Dense Grade Asphalt Concrete, Type B 1/2". F t Asphalt binder shall b, -Viscosity Grade AR -4000 Paving { Asphalt. A - F.O.B. Plant (50 Tons) B - Stockpile City Limits (50 Tons) C - Hopper of Paver (50 Tons) On rendation of the City Manager, Council adopted Resolution No. 86-02 awarding the contract for asphalt materials for the second half of fiscal year 1985-86 as ,K follows: Claude C. Wood Co. Item No. 1 A and B a Item No. 2 A and B A tabulation o the bids received is attached for your information. . Gck Ronsko Works Director Attachment cc: James W. Pruss °- JLR/GCB:sls APPROVED: FILE NO. I� T C COUNCIL COMMUNICATION j. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tdi City Councii FROM: City Manager DATE: January 6, 1986 SUBJECT: Contract for Asphalt Materials - Second Half of Fiscal Year 1985-86 s RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council award the contract for asphalt materials for the second half of fiscal year 1985-86 as follows: Claude C. Wood Company, Clements Item No. i A & B Item No. 2 A & B Granite Construction Company, Stockton item No. 1 C Item No. 2 C BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The specifications for asphalt materials were approved by the City Council at its meeting December 18, 1985 and two (2) bids were received. The cost of asphalt materials increased 3% since the last bid was requested in July, 1985. A tabulation o the bids received is attached for your information. . Gck Ronsko Works Director Attachment cc: James W. Pruss °- JLR/GCB:sls APPROVED: FILE NO. ;aii c CITY OF LODI t31DS FOR ASPHALT MATERIAL u2t. ITEM NO. I ITEM N6. I Concretes "'' Dense Grade Asphalt Concrete, Type Dense.Gra-de Asphalt 3/8" Asphalt binder shall be Viscosity 1/211. Asphalt binder . s ha I l:'Ib6;XV I SCos I tv Grade AR -4000 Paving Asphalt. Grade AR 4000 Paving Asphalt. A 8 C A -B C.. SUPPLIER F.O.B. Plant Stockpile Hopper of Paver F.O.B. Plant Stockpile. Hopper of Paver City Limits, City Limits (500 Tons) (100 Tons) 300 Tons) (50 Tons) -5!0 Tons) A150 Toris I Claude C. Wood Co., Clements CQSL Per ton including.tax S 24-38 S 28.51 5 29.95 $ 23-85 S 27.94 29.42 Plus: City cost for mileage 5.00 5.00 'r0TAL 29.38 28.51 29.95 28.85 27.98 29 42 Granite Construction _Co. , Stkn vv Council of the City of Lodi that award of contract for ( ; �a be and the same is hereby made to Claude C. Wood Company and Granite Construction Company the low binders as shown yy above. Dated: January 15, 1986 ?� RESOLUTION NO. 86-02 was passed and adopted by the City Council i of the City of Lodi in a regular, meeting held January 15, 1986 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Reid. Snider, '-' AWARD - Contract FOR ASPHALT MATERIALS Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Pinkerton _WHEREAS, in answer to notice duly published in " Alice M. Reimche accordance with law and the order of this City Council, j sealed bids were received and publicly opened by the City V Clerk of this City on December 31, 1985 at 11:00 a.m. for t the contract for Asphalt Materials - Second Half of Fiscal Year 1985-86 as described in the specifications therefor approved by the City Council December 18, 1985 and iz _ '. WHEREAS, said bids have been compared, checked, rrY and tabulated and a report thereof filed with the City Manager as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and thereby made apart hereof. WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that award be made to the low bidders as follows: Claude C. Wood Company Item No. l A and B Item No. 2 A and B Granite Construction Company Item No. 1 C Item No. 2 C NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lodi that award of contract for ( Asphalt Materials - Second Half of Fiscal Year 1985-86 �a be and the same is hereby made to Claude C. Wood Company and Granite Construction Company the low binders as shown 4 above. Dated: January 15, 1986 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 86-02 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular, meeting held January 15, 1986 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Reid. Snider, '-' and Hinchman (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Pinkerton Alice M. Reimche City Clerk W To The President Harley Davidson �for Co. P. o. Box 653 Milwaukee, iii 53201 Dear Sir: As a fourteen year member of the City Council of Lodi, California and a strong advocate of the "BUY AMERICAN" philosophy, I have frequently been instrumental in circumventing the purchase of im- ported material and products. Recently, the City of Lodi determined a need for three motorcycles for traffic control use. At my insistence, research was done to compare the quality and performance of American Cycles with those of the more popular imports. The results, of which I am enclosing a copy for your perusal, revealed shocking and disturbing information. With findings such as the "Buy American" philosophy, which is vitally important to the American economy, will become increasingly more difficult to encourage and promote. Itis earnestly desired that the enclosed report be carefully reviewed and that immediate proce/dures be initiated to rectify the opinions or misconceptions regarding your products. /Sicerely your Jr. JWPJr/jb e 4l y4t i-iarley-Davidson Motor Co.. inc., 37oow. n,neat, A.Y -: too. tirn 6s3. mihvauk e'. +1 s3201 31a/342 -46W February 11, 1986 James W. Pinkerton, Jr. Pinkerton Foundry, Inc. P.O. Box 516 Lodi, California 95241 Dear Mr. Pinkerton: Thank you for your letter and subsequent conversation regarding the Lodi bid for three law enforcement motorcycles. We do wish to appeal the decision to buy Kawasaki. The Harley-Davidson Motor Company began building police motorcycles in 1909. Through the course of two world wars, our motorcycles proved invaluable to the Armed Forces where they were used for escort, dispatch and scouting duties. I tell you this to provide some historical perspective. We know how to build a solid, dependable law enforcement motorcycle! In 1981, a group of investors from our management team pooled their resources and purchased the company in a leveraged buy out. From that date forward, everything has changed. As I told you, virtually nothing that we are building today is as it was just five short years ago. Our entire model line has been revamped. In late 1983, we recognized.the need for an all new solo law enforcement motorcycle. We began a development program designed to produce this new police motorcycle based on our FXR Superglide II. This vehicle was developed strictly upon the recommendations of the California Highway Patrol, coupled with all new engineering. From this combined effort emerged the 1984 FXRP. Compared to just a few years past, we now have the following new features: - 1340cc Evolution Engine - Tri -Mount chassis, with isolated engine for vibration free service - 12 Volt, 22 amp electrical system - V -Fire III ignition system, microprocessor controlled - New diaphragm clutch - Final belt drive system - New, deluxe solo saddle for 1986 We inderstand and appreciate the work set forth by Captain Hansen in assembling the PARTS TOTAL momE 59'92 z 9 ~ $179.76 (Chains) ''. 34'28 x 2 - (Sprockets) $248.32 LABOR TOTAL� momo 1.5 hours @ V25'00, per hour ~ $37'50 27'50 z 2 ~ $75'00, labor SAVINGS WITH HARLEY-DAVIDSON - $]2],32 (+/-), per unit HARLEY-DAVIDSON VS KAWASAKI FUEL COST COMPARISON PROJECTION .. a -o KAWASAKI � FUEL oOsr $1.25/Gallon $1'25/Gallon � MILES PER GALLON 45 (Average) 35 (Average) ^ CONSUMPTION l,]ll Gal/50,000 miles 1,428 Gol/50,000 miles COST PER OmzT $I,388,80/50,800 miles V1,785.71/50,000 miles SAVINGS WITH - $396,91 (+/-), per unit One area where we stand totally apart from the competition is our resale value. In � the last few months, the C.H.P. has sold off their first Harley-Davidson F%upsceturued .� from oervlce. The return on these units yielded an average of approximately $4,000, each. Comparable Kawasaki units are sold for an average of $1,000. z would vc&e the City to Iook not only at the up -front cost (where we were still lower than Kawasaki), � but also to loot at the backside and the potential return to the city when these units are retired from service' ' � ^ � ' I