Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 5, 1983 (32)S 'v On motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Murphy second, Council approved a Right -of -Way Agreement between Carr E. and Janice A. Snell and the City of Lodi for the acquisition of right-of-way for the widening of Turner Road immediately west of Cluff Avenue, which Agreement included the following provisions, -M authorized the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City: 2. City agrees to pay Grantor, Carl E. Snell and Janice A. Snell, the scan of $32,840.00 for the certain real property on the attached legal description, when Grantor has transferred to City a Grant Deed for said property, 3. City agrees, in addition to cash payment, a. :b be responsible for the installation: of curb, gutter, sidewalk and street paving at such time as City deems necessary; b. Zb allow an 18" encroachment of a fence or masonary wall in that portion of the City's right--of-way in front of the porch as it is presently constructed at tFds address; c. That Cit-, will not require Grantor to connect the dwelling to public sewer arae water facilities so long as the property is vaned arA usaO as a sinigle family dwelling by Grantor; Council further determined that a 2� foot encroachm; -!� par1 b2 allr-rood under the Dcrorichmnt. perrut to be issued in this :natter. Oa motion of Mayor Pro TEzpore ttarphy, Olson sero nj, Council determined to establish four lanes of trzvel way, with no parking in the area obtained for right-of-way. CITY OF LORI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: City Council -1VN COUNCIL COMMUNICATION FROM: City Manager DATE: December 27, 1982 SUBJECT: Anagnos Right-of-way Acquisition, Turner Road RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council approve the atcached Right -of -Way 7Fg—reement wit rs. Panagiota Anagnos ari authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the agreement for the City. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City Council directed the Public Works Department to acquire t e necessary rights-of-way to complete the construction of Turner Road, west of Cluff Avenue. The Anagnos property was appraised by Mr. Craig Hubbard of Stockton at S9200, ..,e amount in the agreement. In addition, the owners have requested that the City do pertain other work, as described in Paragraph 3 of the agreement. We would like to bring your attention in particular to Paragraph 3b and 3c. In 3b, the owner is requesting that any interim ^idening be at the sole cosi: of the City, understanding that any work not done by the City will be the responsibility of the ,,veloper at the time the property develops. Under 3c, the owner would like to continue to farm any land not needed for immediate widening. Since it is time to prune now, they would appreciate knowing what, if any work, the City Council envisions accomplishing during the summer cf 1983. Other than those 2 items, everything is pretty consistent with previous agreements, and it is our recommendation that. the City Council approve the agreement. O t 101� ic Works Director Attachment JLR: GER: drew APPROVED: :HENRY A. GLAVES, .ity Manager FILE 40. 0;� ! CD T)1 -rr�AI -.R lr_))�,IR'r< u. 6f3• Q`I' ccL' W. 6f4f�.26 vp g RG� R 0.541 so' �� 9•��l 8.4 c?5 C. t/t-il 0.19'49'x4-7000'8Co•4G Z �w 41 j a°•.1 � ill �PCA"I�� � 10G3 I j 15' P. U . E APSAI REQ Ni I e•P u. E. _ =III ZD i~ o AD 25�o.1't''�rc 48�T_49' m%vrT of wq. Y1w 181W L s Z.4 W P_ 7qo /ter t, OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PARCEL MGP OQ HLREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDING OF THE SAME.' WE ALSO HEREBY OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR PUBLIC USE ALL STREETS SHOWN ON ,SAID MAP AND ALL EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES OESIGNA.IED'AS PW I C'UTILIJY-EASEMENTS (P.U.E,) AS SHOWN ON SA1a MAP SUCH PARCEL -S OF'LAND TO BE.KEPT OPEN AND FREE FROM BUILDINGS AND ' STRUCTURES OF ANY KING. ......•, As— ,unucToill• 0101f 1 911RTUFRSNIP ' gd S P. Ile zqe.� �— — �4t'L,p�;' N88•q'i'�, w FOC EAI+ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE C01 CORPORATION, TRUSTEE UNDER DEED 01 VOLUME 4355, PAGE 825 OFFICIAL RE; COUNTYa i. Lj tt P.� P • t � t ` Aught 13, 1982 l _ ,r7 Si tY . i a� ttdrlficatlon of Turner iioad tights -of -Way Acquisition and Construction Between. Beckman Road and -Cluff Avenue BAC1%R011►1d ,INFaRl1ATION.-..: In January. of this:-yoar,-:the,City C II: rgcslwd ;; a �opy>o the atURZrIetter dated .lanuary 14,,198i from .h6ri ris 9106660 alrt itscts rr questing "that: the•.C1tY: cha$e the r;lght,rof-wey>franRing the _re and Simi 1 pa -1 w. In order ,that Turoar: Rwad st+ti:d; b: eonstc.ted toIN Rtefvl`i width to theticipate<I t'°af'ic"f�roia<"the proposed` '= sl Cush ion%Devito t wi thin .the WI ! lova: Oaks, Industr,laI ..Park. _The D�cl l � Y' a the, gave staff direction to obtaln appralsals on the Jerome.and Small'parcpis� 3T .- .At thi . fo i li�►i1e►g : Counc i 1 meet 1 cog i the a� i�chrd !Mena of March, 5,,1982's. 4.. The 6uncl i': i nd i eat ti rea.ewtd with.the�°:Cit,r Council* ed'�that the=avesetees i within this again vi Id be atnswerod ulpon obialninn .the;.pppraisals:;for the 'A:' Snell and Jerome properties. -, � mss.• h§ The 1601ancl.l bas -now diretrad staff'to proceed on the ntqulsi;tlon of the "roan property and the Snell apptralsal. Thareforu, tt;e following questions from the March, mew still need clarification: 1. Since Cal Cushion Is apparently not going .to develop. within `A the 1)Ii law. Oaks Subdivision, &ws this channa :arty p evio ss R t:. C©�nell positionst .. 2. Is "1 t the Council's intention to at I acqul re the Burner �� F rights= -of -way fronfing the AnagiWs property? r 3 Once tho right-of-way is ob atnadr Lai tt the C'tty'a Intent. to � t a P ' for any of the widen den ing" of Th -o_ estivated richt-of-way acauisitlon costs and --onstructl0 costs s ra shown below: �X. Toxa1 It id. Costs Construction Cost ?at�il •v.—�rw+..+.w�.•.� �.�•...r+�'s!rr".a�.—'�"'r.w� w� a tti!M'�CBwYr�r• xy r`.t: y, t y :t__ Based on tla attached tetter from she? Citi Attorney Utaaul' 4 ��~ Ja ny ti, :.W2 f the Wil lew 6k' s Industri`aal Park d rMrt9 r H lnidicated to the City Attor".ney shat c ey (tit 1. OW k% .: --,Ji trf At Parkj would pay; for the street irtroveants fstttl nN' Jea^� (orope�rt i is If the C i y pu rchaaed the r i gl� -t` -w�►. 1 �; �y..-yM • t 4�,.C��,�11 Y� y*5•s _�w _ y y amity Council August 13, 1982 Page 2 �►. If Turner (load is to be widened at City cost. Is the widen - Ing to take place in front of Jerome. Snell and lnagnos properties? 5. if w!dening Is to take place, is it the Council's intent to construct ail of the street Improvements including parking lane, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, or only those Inprovements necessary to provide the ultimate for travel lane? C, if it ly the Council's Intent for the City to be responsible for wideninn, does the Cooncil want to consider reinb ursemcait at the time the propertles develop or convert to a higher use? 7. aces the Council have any prefur,,nco -)n what City funds should be used for the right -(if -way acquisitlon ari any Turner Rond .,i(fen Irq? JAcI`. I Pub) is 4)rks ')Iri!ctcr Atto� 1%, -t % JLR/t rn MORRIS & W IL 301 West Locust Street Lodi, Cahivrnia 93240 Phone (209) 369-8258 January 14, 1982 Mr. Jack Ronsko CITY OF LODI 221 West Pine Street Lodi, California 95240 Dear Mr. Ronsko: 19 Aitc� and planners, inc. As architects for the Willow Oaks Industrial Park and Cal -Cushion Inc., we are formally requesting the public condemnation of Assessor Parcel Nos. 049-020-02 and 049-020-16, Owner3 Snell and Jerome respectively. We also ask that this request be placed upon the next City Council agenda for review and action. Cal -Cushion Inc. of Lodi is proposing a new facility that will ac- commodate 300-400 employees. This high employment, along with trucks from Sanitary City Disposal and other area industries, will generate a considerable amount of traffic at the intersections of Turner and Cluff Roads. Therefore, it is our professional opinion that in the best interest of the City of Lodi and the two property owners, the City condemn this property so Turner Road may be constructed to its full design width at this point. Please find enclosed a parcel chap indicating this requested con- demnation. If you need any additional information, please do not. hesitate to call. Sincerely, ; MORRIS i WENEI.L Architects and Planners Inc. Ct'4_&X Robert Morris, Architect President RM:rf Enclosure Cobert p. mortis • carry weneti RECEIVED J A h 1 K 135? 00 CITY OF LODI existing / residences atdi"Ik cur and gutter PL PLAN BLOW UP 1' 100'-0' % willow oaks golf course case de lodi ®r � va sanitary city 2 I MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Public Works Department TOt City Council FROM: Puhllc Worts Director DATE: March 5, 1952 SU9JECT: Clarification of Staff Dirtctlen to Construct Turner Road (at Cluff Avenue) to its UltImato Width The "act motion, moved by Pinkerton and seconeed by Murphy. Is as follows: "?Mt we try to +acquire the property so we can continue the streets and tie it Into the -existing contrict and get It done at a reasonable price so It's done, out of the way, and to we have a development with an #ccess to the Industrial area of the City of Lodi." Qecauvii of the exact wording of the motion, ae, the staff, feel that clarl- f1catlon is needed on the following Iters: 1. Is it ithe Council's Intention to acquire the required rights-of-way from Snell, Jerome, and Anagnos? For Council's Information, it hrs been past; practice of the City Council to use their condemnatlnn power where portions of future street al1gn ants were needed as part of a proposed development for Installation of utilities, additional street width, drainage, etc. Hwever, It has been in the past, the developer's respansl- biilty to pay for the appraisal, condemnation, and any litigation costs, the right-of-way needs and to sake the necessary Installations required for his development. For Council Information, the appraisal work wilt cost $3,000 and the rights-of-way costs and preliminary construction estimates are an follows: Right -of -Kay Costs* Constr-.ztlon Costs Total Jerome$ 70 $ 8,000 $ 8000 Snell 5,500 11,000 16e5OO Anagnos 10, 800 �.e do0 442800 TOTAL$i 7,0011 $53,000 $709000 *Based on $0.50 per square foot. No value given to severance. E. Is it the Intent that the City pay all of the above costs? This is questioned based on the mama that was in the last Council packet frcaa City Attorney St:win. From this memo It appaers the City Council March 5, 1982 Page 2 developer has Indicated to the City Attorney that they would be wl i l ing to pay for the improvem is to f rout of Snel l and Jorom properties if the City purchased the rights-of-way. 3• is It the City Council's intent to construct all of the street improvements, including parking lane, curb,gutier and -iIdewalk, or only those Improvements necessary to provide tho ultistate four (4) travel lanes? 4. It was clear that they Council wanted this work done in conjunction and together with the work under the Asseswwt District. Since the Assessment District contrs�ct has been tat and it Is tho con- tractor's Intent to Instsll the underground utilities and do the roadway construction on Turner Road fleet, It doesn't appear that we will be able to do the additional work ons Turner Road ire con- junction with the Assessment District contract. it Is assumed that the Council doesn't want to delay the District work. 5. 'f It is the Counci?'s Intent for the CI;y to be responsible for the construct!on costs, does the Council want to consider reimbursement at the time the properties develop and convert to a higher use? 6. if It is the Council's intent for the t1ty to pay for the right -of -Way and the additional street construction, does the Council have any preferes•ce on what City funds should be used? 7. If Cal-Cushlon does not develop (the Clty has no guarantee) is It still the CounclIIs Intent to widen Turner load? .lack L. Ronsko Public Works Director JLREesh