HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 4, 1984 (23)<u- ,,UNC1L COINIMU N1UA'T1cz-
TO. THE CITY COUNCIL DATE NO.
FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE �dltuciiy 3, 1986
SUBJECT:
LEAGUE OF CALIFOR M CITIES PROPOSED DUES INCR ,6E
RECONMENIDED ACTION: That the Citv Council review th-° attached
recomycee.idation of the Board or Directors of the
League of California. Cities and take action as
deemed appropriate.
BAO�GkOUM INFORMATION: The League's Board of Directors, in a unani=rous
vote, .is proposing an increase in dues in the
amount of six percent. A. copy of tie issued
by the League Office is attached. Tine Board action needs ti:e confirmation
by the League 13 regional divisions by Feblrua.r1,> 14, 1985. For t -11 -le City of
Lodi the annual dues increase would be $251 per year. This matter will be
on the agenda for action at the quarterlf,•izeeting of the Central Valley
Division in Oakdale January 15, 1986. Division: President Charles E. Nleal
has requested that all cities come to the Oakdale .x-eting prepared to cast
a vote on this issue.
Respectfully submitted,
f------------
Thomas
-_-------
Thomas A. Peterson
City Manager
TAP/1h
N � ��
Central Valley Division ZE r _mac
LEAGUE of CALIFORNIA CITIES
V
December 23, 1985
MEMBER CITIES
• ANGELS CAMP MAYOR DAVID H I NCHMAN
CITY OF LODI
. ATWATER Post Office Box 350
Lodi, California 95240
. cE:Res
Subject: PROPOSED DUES INCREASE BY THE
. cE+gwCEIIrIA LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
• DOS PALOS
Dear Mayor:
. ESCALON
The attached information regarding a proposed dues
•GUSTINE increase by the League of California Cities is presented
for your information and review. The Central Valley.
•HUGHSON Division of the League will consider the matter as a
part of the agenda at the Quarterly Meeting in Oakdale,
• LIVINGSTON January 16, 1986. Ratification or rejection of the
• Lc�rn proposal must be done within 60 days from the date of
submittal, or the Division will be considered as having
• LOSFIAN(,S ratified the dues increase. The January 16 meeting will
be the only opportunity that the Division will have to
• MANTECA act, upon this matter._
• NIERCFI) I would request that all cities come prepared to cast
the vote for their City at the January 16 Quarterly
. MODESTO Meeting.
• NEWMAN
Your questions should be directed to members of the
. OAKDAiE League Board of Directors or League staff, or they may
be addressed at our meeting prior to a vote on this
. PATTE:HSON matter.
. RIPON
Sincerely,
. HFVEHHANf:
6�71LP
. SONORA
CHARLES E. NEAL
PRESIDENT
. STOCKTON
CENTRAL VALLEY DIVISION
. TRACY
CEN:eac
. TURLUCR
Enclosures
. WATERFORD
d �l
, ® League ®# California Cities
JEWN
31301L 1400 K STREET • SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • (916) 444-5790
Caldom a Cities
Work Together
Sacramento, CA
December 18, 1985
TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks in Lion-Manager Cities
FROM: Pat Russell, Council President, Los Angeles and President, League
of California Cities
SUBJECT: League of California Cities' Financial Condition and Proposed
i.. Dues Increase
<r` The League of California Cities' Board of Directors by unanimous vote is
proposing an increase in dues in the amount of six percent (6', which
represents a total net increase in revenues to the League in 1986 of
approximately $77,861 or 3.2%. The action of the Board of Directors needs to
be confirmed by the Leaque's 13 regional divisions by February 14, 1986. The
, following memo provides a ssrriary of the League's financial condition, its
proposed dues schedule and the line item budget for calendar }ear 1986.
You are urged to immediately review the enclosed materials and should you have
questions regarding the proposed budget, you are encouraged to contact the
" Executive Director Don Benninghoven in the Sacramento office of the Leaque or
members of the Board of Directors and to express your feelings regarding the
dues increase to your respective League division.
Background: The League of California Cities is a voluntary association of
cities. I am pleased to report that the League continues to have 100%
membership and that in 1985 dues represented approximately 59% of the total
revenue while 31% was from conferences and institutes, 5.5$ from the Annual
Exposition and 4.5% from investment income.
In the past, it has been the policy of the League to have large periodic dues
increases, usually 50% to offset infiation.and costs of needed service
programs. Last year, when the membership agreed to a dues increase, it was
the strong recommendation of city officials that the League make every effort
to avoid large periodic dues increases in the future. The 1983 amendment to
the League Constitution and Bylaws addressed that concern by authorizing the
Boards of Directors, by a two-third's vote, to increase dues up to IJ%
annually.
The amendment went on to provide for ratification of any dues increase by the
regional divisions within 60 calendar days from the date of submittal by the
Board of Directors. Ratification by a majority of division representing a
majority of cities is required. Regional divisions not responding within 60
calendar days shall be considered to have ratified the dues increase_
Current Financial Condition: League dues increase approximately 1.5, par year
while expenses are increasing on an averace of 10% per year. Attached is the
line item budget for the League of California.Cities, including the 1985
proposed budget; estimated actual expenses for the calendar year and the
proposea 1980 budget.
At the end of 1985 the League's financial condition a_s good. Lower than
expected expenses, along with greater attendance at League conferences and
institutes, has permitted the League to re-establish its prudent reserve and
at the same time continue to move forward with a sound service program and a
strong legislative advocacy program while also implementing a major data
processing/office automation effort that will permit the League to enhance its
legislative, membership and legal services to the meaioership.
Proposal: The League Board of Directors, as authorized by the League's
Constitution and Bylaws, is proposing a 6% dues increase, .~high will result in
approximately $77,861 in new revenue for calendar year 1986. This dues
increase represents a modest 3.2`s increase in general purpose revenue for the
League. While city general purpose revenues are estimated to increase
approximately 7.100- in 1985-86 according to the State Department of Finance,
the League is able to maintain its service program and build upon that very
successL;l program with this dues increase.
In 1986, the League of California Cities, in addition to carrying out the wide
range of services undertaken last Year, will add the foiiowing activltles:
Completion of implementation of the data processing/office automation
system. The League has purchased a Hewlett-Packard 3000 with the
appropriate .software to greatly enhance our word processing capabilities,
list management and publications management, legislative bill service and
electronic mail, library manage -Ent, seminar and conference management,
research analysis aid accounting.
Public Information Activities for three Jurie propositions which will
greatly impact on local government: tort reform, reinstatement of general
obligation, bond financing, and guarantee of the motor vehicle in lieu fees.
These issues are of vital concern to cities and a well organized public
information program will be initiated beginning in Jzx-.7.;ary 1986 that will
require additional staff support and resources.
-- Study the feasibility of creating an excess liability insurance statewide
fund.
The League office in Washington, DC, has provided an important link to bot:
activities of concern to California cities and our relationship with the
National League of Cities. The Board of Directors is proposing to maintain
our Washington office with a full time staff position.
These activities, coupled with the on-going programs provided by the Leagues,
are contained within the proposed 1386 line item budget.
2 -
:..:...... ..:D YEAR END
' PR)POIS-D 1986F. r
LEAGUE OF :-ALIFORNTA CITIES
Line Ite❑
STATKCtENT Or
REVENUE
e EXPF.NDi URE`'
REVENUE
1985 Audoet
nuc.
S1, 31`?, 341.
Ccni. b Inst.
xeq>_s.
635,6 5.
Interest
A,-.nua1 Cori. Exhibits
94,S,C.
Misc. S Cont.
-0
Aporop. Prior
Year
2;:,864.
.JTAL REVENUES S2, 4,..,
E SP E" 10 I'URE
lursonneI
Soc. Serurl_ .
Reciremer,t
Hos f,: to 1
Disability
Dental
Unemployment
;ravel a Exre ns-
Fen:
Los Angeles
Wa5hlr,gton
i'Ostaye
Mailinq Service
Telephone
Office Suec;llcs b Exp.
Equip. Maine. .Agreement
board Meeting Exp.
;Ties s Memher,.aips
A. NL -1
8. Other
Taxes 6 Insurance
Annual Conf. 6 ins[.
Legislative Advocacy
Library
Special Services
A. Req. Divisions
H. Research & Intor.
C. co:.mictep Exp.
D. Other Services
Special Pro3ects
A. Staff Devel.
3. 1 me r n s,Con Si; 1.
C. Salary Survey
0. Ranqe ?iders
E. Data Autcmation
Annual .:Cnf. Exhibits
;tiscellaneous s pont.
Captisl : provv�en[s
A. :uro�
B. Rer
9145,214.
246,4
62, C6^.
200.
2,3
-0-
6,500.
54, 0.
53.050.
24,550.
60,32..
61,030.
49,140-
11,890.
21,9CO.
24n 430.
20,J00.
1' 500.
46,500.
3,000.
3,000.
28,C00.
,Soo.
75, .
20,60;.
35,000.
5,000.
5,000-
10,000.
55,
6-,d6..
235.
21,000.
214,600.
i?
1935
REL ENL
rI, 34l+, 1L1. .
720,7S-3-
19 a 5
20,7S•_.
1985
3 fl0 .
s1,500.
47,560"_
49,00•.
23 ;Cc.
40,250.
300, COO.
15,coq.
11, SCC.
34,^:
Soo.
23...�0.
9,537.
S, 330.
1986
REVENU
,423,3f:v.
7tg nGO.
115, .On.
Exna nc_[ '•
:y40
54,-)C.
54,
5., ^.n.
SO,J
4U, 4C,.
18,440.
29.0:;0.
332,
2 C -) 30 -
^0.
45,5•^`.
4,00;.
S 2.OC,0. 00
2,400,00^
2,300,000
2,200,000
2,100,000
2,000,000
1,900,000
1,800,000
1,700,000
1,500,000
1,-00,600
,.4^0,000
1,300,000
1.200,000
1,100,000
1,000,000
900,000
1S8i 1982 1983 1984 19?5 1--, 7
T OTAL
LEAGUE
2E'TE=E.. to®���������
OF CAT FOlq.`IA CRIES
O -ST-
i)- DUES
LFACUE OF CALIFORNIA CTT1r:S
REVENUE
1981-1986
1981 1982 1983 1981+ 1985 1980
51,57�),s70 $1,506,718 $1,791,539 $2,060,423 $2,297,436 $2,409,747
exhibits
Finterest
exhibits
interest
1981 1982 1983 1981+ 1985 1980
51,57�),s70 $1,506,718 $1,791,539 $2,060,423 $2,297,436 $2,409,747
T,RAC:�TIF OF CALIFCRNIA CITIES
By Laws adopted October 1983 by the Annual Conference general asser,bly
two-thirds (2%3) vote requires.
ARTICLE IX - DUES
Section 1. Dues
The annual Dues for Member Cities, and the annual service charge for
registered cities of the League on and after January 1, 1985 shall be as
follows:
1985 Proposed 1986
For cities having a population of:
1 -
500 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .. 22
$ 23
501 -
600 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 56
69
601 -
700 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 111
118
701 -
800 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 223
130
801 -
900 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 145
15�
901 -
1,()00 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 178
189
11001 -
1,250 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 279
296
1,251 -
1,500 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 346
367
1, 501 -
1, 750 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 412
Y3
1,751 -
2,000 . . . . _ .
. . . . . . . . 490
519
2,001 -
2,250 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 524
-555
21251 -
2,500 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 5 7':
614
2,501 -
2,750 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 613
650
2,751 -
3,C00 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 668
706
3,001 -
4,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 746
791
4,001 -
31000 . . . . . . .
. _ . . . . 890
943
5,001 -
7,500 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 1,153
1,227
7,501 -
10,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 1,336
,416
10,001 -
15,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . _ 1,614
1,711
15,001 -
20,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 1,859
11971
20,001 --
25,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 2,327
2;467
25,001 -
30,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 2, 794
2,962
30,001 -
40,000 . . . . : . .
. . . . . . . . 3,440
3,636
40,001 -
50,000 . . .
_ _ . 4',185
4,436
50,001 -
60,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 4,820
5,109
60,001 -
7/0,000 . . . . .. .
. . . . . . . . 5 , 298
5,616
70,001 -
80,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 5,535
5,899
80,001 -
90,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 5,933
6,289
90,001 -
100 , COO . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 6,500
0,590
100,001 -
125,000 . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 7,413
7,858
125,001 -
150,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . S,159
81648
150,001 -
200,000 . . . .=x
.
. . . . . . . 9,272
1828
200,001 -
500,000 . . . . . .
. . _ . . . . _ 465"
493*
over 500,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 430*
450°
aper each
10,000 ':)ooulation
In no event shall the annual dues or service charge for any City exceed a
total amount of 550,000. No city's dues s: -all ^,crease more that -1
S 5 , lJ'.. v '��� r
year..
For the purpose of this section, the population of each city shall be the
population determined by the State Controller in making the most recent
allocation to cities pursuant to the Vehicle License Fee Law.
Section 2. Increase in Dues.
As may be warranted the Board of Directors by a two-thirds' ;2/3)
vote may increase the dues schedule after notice and justification to
the cities, as rrovided in Section l up to ten percent(10%) annually.
Section 3. Ratification by Regional Divisions.
Any dues increase passed by the Board of Directors.as provided
for in Section 2 above shall be submitted to the regional divisions
for ratification. Ratification by a majority of the regional divisions
representing a majority of the member cities constitutes approval of
the dues increase. Regional divisions must respond to the submittal
of the dues increase within 60 calendar days from the date of submittal
by the Board of Directors. Regional divisions not responding within 6,;
calendar days shall be considered as having ratified the Dues inc-ease.
MMINK
IMIEW soon
League of California lies
IMMM 1400 K STREET e SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 ;916) 44 5%QQ
EML-
Caldom,a Cares
Vioik Together
Sacramento, Cti
December 18, 1985
TO: Mayors, City 'lanao�rs and City Clercs in Non—Manager Cit1'e
FR(Y•1: pat Russell, Council ?resident, Los iV-iceles and presi ;lt i_x?ag:
of California Cities
SUBJECT: League of California Cities' Financial Condition and Prop=N-!i
Dues increase
The League of California Cities' Board of Directors by unan,-irr3us vote IS
proposing an increase in dues in the amount of six percent (o=;) which
represents a total net increase in revenues to the League in 1986 of
approximately $77,861 or 3_=-6. The action of t -he Board of Directors note,i:s to
be confirm&& by the League's 13 regional Avis_.fns by February 14, 1966).
following memo provides a sui*mary of 'the League's financial condition,
proposed dues schedule and the line item bua,et for calendar year 198:_
you are urged to irai,. diatoly r�'view the encloses:. rlaterials and, should
quost-ions regarding the proposed bur3get, you are encouraced to cont;?ct
E.xf'cutive Director Don Elenninghoven in the Sacrai(�2nto office of the 'Loan ice ,r
mewb(-_,rs of the Board �L vircCtOrsand to express Vour feelings '>ti7arCliii_':
dues increase to your respective League divisic'-_
Backoround: The League of California Cities ?S a voluntary associa,_iori of.
cities. I am pleased to report that the League continues to have 10J'i:
membership and that in 1985 dues represented approximately 5)3 of the tot;:-,.
r(venue_' while .31`5 was from conferences and institutes, 5.5`s irom the AnnU?1
Exposition and 4.5% from investment income.
In the past, it has been the policy of the League to have large peri xiic
increases, usually 50% to offset inflation and costs of needed service
programs. Last year, when the membership agreed to a dues increase, it w s
the strong recommendation of city officials that the League make every effort
to avoid large periodic dues increases in the future. The "983 a;^f'R,31^t'nt to
the League Constitution and Bv),aws 'addressed that concern by authorizing C;P
Boards of Directors, by a two—third's vote, to increase dues up to 10$
annually.
The amendment went on to provide for ratificat_Un of any 'Juts incce3::-_,? ;y t}?."
regional divisions within 60 calendar days frott thc. date_ of sub -,Ii al C>G' tht=
Board of Directors. Ratification by a :na)ority of"division rearesent_inc a
majority of cities is required. Regional divisions not responding 'withi:?
calendar days shah be considered to have ratified the dues increase.
Current Financial Condition: Leagu> dues incr-'ase al iroxi:mateiy 1.6"".or =ar
while expenses are increasing cn an _average of '0% -F_=r vear. ,Attached is tr?t:
line item budget for the Leaulue of a11fOi'nia ,..tiles, including the 1'_i85
C 1 9 X985
proposed budget, estimated actual expenses for the calendar year and the
proposed 1986 budget.
At the end of 1985 the League's financial condi'-ion is good. Lower than
expected expenses, along with greater attendance at League conferences and
institutes, has permitted the League to re-establish its prudent reserve and
at the lana time continue to move forward with a sound service program and a
strong legislative advocacy program while also -implementing a major data
procassing/office automation effort that will permit the League to enhance its
legislative, membership and legal services to the membership.
Proposal: The League Board of Directors, as authorized by the League's
Constitution and Bylaws, is proposing a 6% dues increase, which will result in
approximately $77,8.51 in new revenue for calendar vep.r 1986. This dues
increase represents a modest 3.2% increase in general purpose revenue for the
League. While city ger.�ral purpose revenues are estimated to increase
approximately 71.1% in 1985-86 according to the State Department of Finance,
the League is able to maintain its service program and build upon that very
successful program with this dues increase.
In 1986, the League of California Cities, in addition to carrying out the wide
range of services undertaken last year, will add the following activities:
-- Completion of implementation of the data processing/office automation
system. The League has purchased a Hewlett-Packard 300-0 with the
appropriate software to greatly enhance our word processing capabiliti=es,
list management and publications management, legislative bill service and
electronic mail, library management, seminar and conference management,
research analysis and accounting.
-- Public Information _activities for three June propositions which wi11
greatly impact on local government: tort reform., reinstatement of general
obligation bond financing, and guarantee of the motor vehicle in lieu.fees.
These issues -ire of vital concern to cities and a well organized public
information program %-illi be initiated beginning in Janilary 1986 that will
require additional staff support and resources.
-- Study the feasibility of creating an excess liability insurance statewide
fund.
The League office in Washington, DC, has provided an important link to both
activities of concern to California cities and our relationship with the
National League of Cities. The Board of Directors is proposing to maintain
our Washington office with a full time staff position.
These activities, coupled with the on --going prograi;zs provided by the League,
are contained within the proposed 1986 line item budget.
- 2 -
proposed bud -,et, estimated actual expenses for the calendar year and the
proposed 1.986 budget.
At the end of 1985 the League's financial condition is good. Lower than
expected expenses, along with greater attendance at Leagu conferences and
institutes, has permitted the League ro re-establish its prudent reserve and
at the sarrra time continue to move forward with a sound service program and a
strong legislative advocacy program while also implementing a major data
processing/office automation effort that will permit the League to enhance its
legislative, membership and legal services to the membership.
Pr000sal: The League Board of Directors, as authorized by the League's
Constitution and Bylaws, is proposing a 6% dues increase, which will result in
approximately $77,861 in new revenue for calendar year 1986. This :lues
increase represents a modest 3.2% increase in general purpose revenue for the
League. While city o-:�neral purpose revenues are estimated to increase
approximately 7.1% in 1985-86 according to the State Department of Finance,
the League is able to maintain its service program and build upon that very
successful program with this dues increase.
In 1936, the League of California Cities, in addition to carrying out the wide
range of services undertaken last year, will add the following activities:
-- Completion of implementation of the data processing/office automation
system. The League has purchased a Hewlett-Packard 3000 with the
appropriate software to greatly enhance our word processing capabilities,
list management and publications management, legislative bill service and
electronic mail, library management, seminar and conference management,
research analysis and accounting.
Public Information Activities for three June propositions which will
greatly impact on local government: tort reform, reinstatem.nt of general
obligat4.on bond financing, and guarantee of the motor vehicle iii lieu fees.
These issues are of vial concern to cities and a well organized public
information program will be initiated beginning in Jan:iary 1986 that will
require additional staff support and resources.
Study the feasibility of creating an excess liability insurance statewide
fund.
— The League office in Washington, DC, has provided an iminportant liiik to both
activities of concern to California cities and our relationship with the
National League of Cities. The Board of Directors is proposing? to rraintin
our Washington office with a full time staff position_
These activities, coupled with the on-going programs pro!ided by the
are contained within the proposed 1986 line item budget.
- 2 -
-ESTIMATED YEAR END
—PROPOSED 1986 BU:)GET
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
Line Item Budget
STATEMENT' OF REVENUE 6 EXPENDITURES
1935
1986
REVENUE
'1985 Bndaet
REVENUE
REVENUE
Uucti _
51,319,341.
51,34(,,103.
Coni. s Inst. kegi:;.
635,625.
720,750.
759,350.
Interest
130,000.
120,000.
Annual Conf. Exhibits
94,500.
110,583.
132,000.
Misc. 6 Cont.
-0-
-0-
-„-
Approp. Prior Year
261,664.
-0-
-,-
TOTAL REVENUES
$2,441,130.
$2,297,436.
,430,914.
1985
1986
EXPENDITURES
19-95 Budget
Exnenditures'
Expenditure's ••
Personnel
S 995,314.
S 950,)00.
eetire/Group Ins.
.4u,870.
230,945.
_58,'Ci0.
Soc. Security
63, OO6.
67,000.
nd,`+..,;.
Retirement
104,-66.
94,295.
,_ ,:-OC_
Ho s r i t a 1
62,06").
54,500.
54,5;;.
Disabi1.1r
4,200.
3,400.
3,'aSO.
Dental
12,750.
11,750.
_2,957.
Unemployment
-0-
-0-
-.-
Travel 6 Expense
68,500.
95,0.00.
100, :i0.
hent
1`�, 799.
-, Sq.
20,0,11n.
Los Angeles
13,200.
Washinator
6,500.
4,410.
Postage
52,800.
47,800.
54,j'1O.
Mailing Service
2,000.
11500.
-0-
Telephone
54,000.
47,500.
54,'`00.
office Sk!Pp r:: a L:xp.
53,050.
49,000.
53,900.
L.quip. Main,, Agreement
24,550.
23,700.
board Meeting Exp.
60,325.
40, S0.
Dues s Memberships;
62,930.
58.000.
67,631?.
A. NLC
49,140.
49,140.
B. Other
11,890.
13,490.
;'axe:; s Insurance
21,900.
21,900.
29,000.
Annual Conf. & Inst.
249,430.
300,0^:2.
332,500.
Legislative Advocacy
20,000.
15,000.
20,000.
Library
11,500.
11,5j0.
12,7;;0.
Special Services
46,500.
34,037.
45,501.
A. keg. Divisions
3,000.
1,500.
4,00:7.
B. Research 6 Infor.
3,000.
-0-
4,000.
C. Committe,� Exp.
28, 000.
23,000.
25,000.
0. Other Services
12,500.
9,537.
12,500.
Special Projects
75,000.
41,556.
50,570.
A. Staff Devel.
20,000.
14,000.
20,000.
B. Interns/Consul.
35,000.
5,000.
18,000_
C. Salary Survey
5,000.
5,000.
3,Ci00.
D. Range Riders
5,000.
5,000.
6,500.
E. Data Aut(,;nacion
10,000.
10,56.
-0-
Annual Conf. Exhibits
55,000.
64,764.
7225..
Miscellaneous. & Cont.
67,861.
7, 77 00.
54,456.
'aptial Improvement';
235,800.
223,360.
48, o
A. Autos
211,000.
21,090_
B. )tt:cr
214,800.
202,360.
27,000.
7
C1.TAL EXPE::DI7URICS
5..,441,130.
r,290,038.
Y.WUF OF CALIFORNIA CITTIE.;
1981 1982 1983 19184 1995 1986
I , 5 7 0, '170 5t 596, 718 S],,/91,53q2 S'2,409,747
S 9 T, / 4 3 6
a
i
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 157>
TOT:S.L RE VLNU .. aamakmam 0 noLAem Day -w> �r c� «a aka "... .:r' i�5.
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES -- SUMHARY OF DUES, REVENTUE AND F)TL';DiTURFS
e
2,400,000
"gaseous
2,300,000
44L!
2,200,000
4 #
4
oe 1
2,100,000
� r
2,000,000
1,900,000
1 ,:800,000
$
s
1,700.000
$ a
1,600,000
4
1,500,000
p
B�Oaai��aa��ABl, P'�
WW
1,400,000
1,300,000
1,200,000
—
1,100,000
--
1,000,000
€
900,000
s
a
i
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 157>
TOT:S.L RE VLNU .. aamakmam 0 noLAem Day -w> �r c� «a aka "... .:r' i�5.
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES -- SUMHARY OF DUES, REVENTUE AND F)TL';DiTURFS
$ 2,500,000
2,400,000
2,300,000
air
2,200,000
I� a
e
2,100,000
2,000,000
1,900,000
1,800,000
1,700,000
1,600,000
1,500,000
1,400,000
1,300,000
1,200,000
i 1,100,000
d
1,000,000
900,000
1
1981 1982 1983
1984 1985 1986
TOTAL REVENUE: DUES-
EY2E*iSES : -
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — SL -,N -A --,Y
OF DUES, REVZNUE AND EY ENDITURES
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
By Laws adopted October 1983 by the Annual Conference general assembly
two-thirds (2/3) vote requires.
ARTICLE IX - LUES
Section 1. Dues
The annual Dues for Member Cities, and the annual service charge for
registered cities of the League on and after January 1, 1985 shall be as
follows:
1985 Proposed 1.986
For cities having a population of:
1 -
500 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . $ 22
$ 23
501 -
600 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 56
69
60' -
700 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . ill
118
701 -
800 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 123
i -J
801 -
900 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 145
154
901 -
11000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 178
189
1,001 -
1,250 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 279
296
1,251 -
1,500 . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 346
367
11501 -
1,750 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 412
437
1,751 -
2,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 490
519
2,001 -
2,250 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 524
555
2,251 -
),500 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 579
614
2,501 -
2,750 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 613
650
2,751 -
3,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 668
708
3,001 -
4,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 746
791
4,001 -
5,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 890
943
51001 -
7,500 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 11158
1,227
7,501 -
10,000. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 1,336
1,416
10,001 -
15,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 1,614
1,711
15,001 -
20,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 11859
1,971
20,001 -
25,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 2,327
2,467
25,001 -
30,0&')0 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 2,794
2,962
30,001 -
40,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 3,440
3,636
40,001 -
50,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 4,185
4,436
50,001 -
60,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 4,820
5,109
60,001 -
70,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 5,298
5,616
70,001 -
80,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 5,565
51899
80,001 -
90,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 5,933
6,289
90,001 -
100,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 61500
6,890
100,001 -
125,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 7,413
7,858
125,001 -
150,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 8,159
8,648
1.50,001 -
200,000. . . . .
. . . . . . . . 9,272
91828
200,001 -
500,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 465*
493*
over 500,000 . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 430*
456*
*per each
10,000 population
In no event shall the annual dues or service charge for any city exceed a
total amount of 550,000. No city's dues shall increase more than $5,000 r
year.
For the purpose of this section, the population of each city'shkall be the
population determined by the State Controller in making the most recent
allocation to cities pursuant to the Vehicle License Fee Law.
Section 2. Increase in Dues.
As.may be warranted the Board of Directors by a two-thirds' (2/3)
vote may increase the dues schedule after notice and justification to
the cities, as provided in Section 1 up to ten percent(10%) annually.
Section 3. Ratification by Regional Divisions. _
Any dues increase passed by the Board of Directors as provided
for in Section 2 above shall be submitted to the regional divisions
for ratification. Ratification by a majority of the regional divisions
representing a majority of the member cities constitutes approval of
the dues increase. Regional divisions must respond to the submittal
of the dues increase within 60 calendar days from the date of submittal
by the Board of Directors. Regional divisions not responding within. 60
calendar days shall be considered as having ratified the dues increase.
Section 2. Increase in Dues.
As may be warranted the Board of Directors by a two-thirds' (2/3)
vote may increase the dues schedule after notice and justification to
the cities, as provided in Section 1 up to ten percent(10%) annually.
Section 3. Ratification by Regional Divisions.
Any dues increase passed by the Board of Directors as provided
for in Section 2 above shall be submitted to the regional divisions
for ratification.. Ratification by a majority of the regional divisions
representing a majority of the member cities constitutes approval of
the dues increase. Regional divisions must respond to the submittal
of the dues increase within 60 calendar days from the date of submittal
by the Board of Directors. Regional divisions not responding within 60
calendar days shall be considered as having ratified the dues increase.
RESOLUTION NO. 85-15
RESOLUTION APPROVING LEAGUE OF CAL-TFOR41A CITIES
DUES INCREASE
RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby
approve the proposed League of California Cities dues increase, whereby
the annual dues for the City of Lodi would be increased from $4,185.00
to $4,436.00.
DATED: January 15, 1986
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 85-15 was passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a Regular
Meeting held January 15, 1986 by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members - Olson, Reid, Snider, and Hinchman
(Mayor)
NOES: Council Members - None
ABSLM: Council Members - Pinkerton
ABSTAIN: Council Members - None
ATTEST:
ALICE M. REIIAM
City Clerk