Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - November 1, 1989 (63)OCT 11 1$0 City M80ser s OfIce Re: Hutchins Street Squar- Band 6ilCi1 - Dear: Mr. Paterson: Local 'r'esidents who live around Hutchins Street Square need your support and .consideration before providing any further authorizationVor construction of a bard 'shell on the Square properties. its. Several issues need to be addressed that you may or may not be aware of The primary issue is noise. Proponents claim low noise and no rock c"o"ncerts; but, realistically it would be a public facility. At the present time neither the police, park rangers, nor the responsible parties at Hutchins Street Sq F_ia.r'e ch •se to address the problem. A second issue, of equal magnitude, is the la'r'ge dollar expenditure for a facility that would be, in our opinion, poorly utilized. Lots put the money into the "music at_lditoriurtvl and have the use of a facility year round. Lastly, the band shell, we are told, would eliminate the soccer field. We feel that the number of individuals that particpate .in sporting events at the Square far out -weigh the limited usage of a band shell. A facility of this type needs to be developed in . 'Ek -j ige field, possibly Micke Grove. CurAntly Lodi has facilities like Kofu Park, the Grap;? Bowl, and the Amphithreater at the festival grounds that could facilitate music c"o"ncerts. In the beginning, the promoters of Hutchins Street Square recognized that the facilities ars "nestled in a quiet older neighborhood of northwest Lodi." Our co==ncern is that maintainin=g this type of environment is no longer a priority of the Old L.UHS Site Foundation Committee. - This project appears to be a dream of a privileged few, and it seems the majority of h=eal citizens ane being overl=ooked.,. it is our belief that if this project corttinuas, we soon will have anyone with afetish and financial backing buiiding at .the Square. We have something unique; let's keep it that way. More in this case in not bitter. We will be lore t__a_: happy to discusss this matter with you?at", your earliest connionce. Sincere Dr. Drexel &Kimber y r tits Rose Street Committee Chairmans 125 South Rose Lodi, Ca 95-"4>t7 334-0138 Octr ber 16, 19£3'3 Tare Peterson, City Manager City Nall 221 W. Pine Street Lodi, Ca 95240 �'yrJ 9 Dear Mr. Fit ersn As a fr 11� ow -up to our letter' dated October 8, 1989, please be advised that we would like to be notified of any issues coming before you regarding the "sand Shell" at Hutchins Street Square. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Slrtcerel Dr�. Drexel A Kimb rly F tits Rose Street Committe Chairmans 125 S.-D_:th Rise LcId i y Ca �!JJt-:t1 �J8 October 16. 1989- Jim 589 J'im Schroeder r`--'1arin3 De part,,IO-nt City Nall c=Gl W. Pirte Str-"eet. Lodi, Ca Q-5-2-40 5 -2.4 0 Dear Mr. Schroeder: As a fol 1 -w-up to ; lur le?tier dated October 81 198s! please be advised that we e•bDuld 1 i ?c t:_ be notified rbfany issues ccaainr bef_re You regarding the "Band Shell" at Nutchin5 Street Square Tinank you in advance for y_ur cooperation. S - rnc.ere , o Lir^ Drexel & }::iF,?rli_,.1v ,Rose SI,r'eet L�ornroil te' FilaiY'Fticirl5 f 125 South Rose Lodi, Ca 35240 354-0138 October 8, 1989 Jim Schroeder City Planning Department 221 W. Fine Street Lodi, Ca 95240 Re: Hutchins Street Square Band Shell Dear- Mr. Schroeder,: Local residents who live around Hutchins Street. Square need your support and consideration before providing arty further authorization for construction of a band `shell on theSquare properties. Several issues need to be aOdressed that you may, or may not be aware of: - The primary issue is noise. Proponents claim, low noise and no rock concerts; but, realistically it would be a public facility. At the present time neither the police, park ringers, nor. the responsible parties at Hutchins Street Square choose to address the problem. A second issue, of equal magnitude, is the large dollar expenditure for a facility that would be, in our opinion, pooriy utilized. Lets put the money into the "music auditorium- and have the use of a facility year rouna. Lastly, the band shell, we are told, would eliminate the soccer field. We feel that the number of individuals that particpate in sporting event=_ at the Square far out -weigh the limited usage of a band shell. A facility of this type needs to be developed in a large open field, possibly i*licke Grove. Currently Lodi, has facilities liu.e Kofu Park., the Grape Bowl, and the Amahithreater at the festival grounds that Could facilitate music concerts. In the beginning, the promoters ,--,f Hutchins Street ,`"gLiarye recoanlzed that the facilities are "nestled in a quiet ,lde%- nelghb:trt'iood of nc'r,thwest Lc,d2. " Our concern is that mFintalrl22'SCf this type .,f environment is roc, 1i--Inger a, pr'10rlty of the Old LUHS A Site Foundation Committee. This project appears to be a dreartz of a privileged few, and it seems the majority of local citi ens are being,=,Ver1,=-+=kcal, It 1S- c,j!r belief that if this project ccY�t7.i�,_ies, we s,_Ion will have anyone with a fetish and financial backiYtg bLl11.d7.nLj c?t fife cgficcr'e. We have somethin_Q Unique; let's keep it that way. More in t i,25 case is not better. We will be more than har,p_y to discusss this matter with y ,:.� at vour earliest convience. S i nci,r L��o Ur.WDX e firaber r^,_iit= Rose 'Street Committee Chairman_ 1:_:_5 South Rase Lod i, Ca d� 9524L%1 E3ct bar 16, 19139 Alice Rein„he, City Clerk. City Hall L2,1 W. Pine Street G. `: 0 Dear Mis. As a-fr�lla�a-�_ip t•.• a�_�r letter dated October 8, 133'3, pleasE be advised that tae i�o�!ld like to b= notifiedf any iss+ses c -roi, before you the "Band Shell” at Hutchins Street Square. Thank you in advance fl --r` y0f-W cooperation. nc e t f Q Ur. Drexel c, i:imber ly Fruits, Pose Street Coramitte Ch,4irma-ns l25 South Rose Lodi, Ca 95240 334+Dl38 October 8 l989 ' Alice Reimche, City Clerk ` 221 W. Pire Street ' Lodi, Ca 25240 � . Re: Hutchins Street Square Band Shell ` Dear iMs' Reimche: ' ' Local residents who live around Hutchins Street Square need your support and consideration before providing any further ` authorization for constructi"n of a band on the Square ^ ' ' ^ ' ties ' �'o,`ope,r. Several issues need to be addressed that you may or may not be�-' ` aware of: The primary issue is noi-;e. Proponents claim lo'~ noise and no �' �"�� ` rock con�erts� but realistically l� it would be a public faczilit`' ' ' ��` �'- , -. At the ; esent time neither the police, park. rangers, nor the � responsible parties at Hutchins Street Square choose to address the problem. _ A second issue, of equal magnitude, is the large dollar expenditure for a facility that would be, - in our opinion, poorly utilized. Lets put the money into the "music auditorium" and have the use of a facility year round. Lastly, the band shell, we are told, would eliminate the soccer field. We feel that the number of individuals that particpate in sporting events at the Square far out -weigh the limited usage of a band shell. ` zA facility of this type needs to be developed in a large open field, possit,'/ Micke Grove. Currently Lodi has facilities like ' Kofu Park, the Grape Bowl, and the Amphithreater at the festival, grounds that could facilitate music concerts. ` ` ` � 7 A70 7 In the beginning, the promoters of Hutchins Street Sq:_tare recognized that the facilities are "nestled in a q:_riet lder neiohbc-IrhosDd of northwest L-odi." Our concern is that maintainirtg this Ipe oi- environment is nr: longer a priority of the Old LUHS SiE,_. t-,Du-fdati! n Committee - This pr-oject appears to be a dream, of a privileged few, arc, it seems he ma_;or"ity c,f local citizens are being overlooked. it is o:.xr belief that if this project cont ig•:Lies, `we boon will have anyone with a fetish and 1"inarlcial backing building at the square. We have something unique, let'? keep it that way. More in this case is not better. We will be more than happy to discusss this r:liatter with you at your earliest cs env i ence. SireQcer e , P L 'I Dr. Drexel 3• F'-irjber ruits Rose Street C,_:r m i t t ee C ha irmans