The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - September 28, 1988 (93)G ,ry OF LO • 4 gl,sOp�� PUBUIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: City Council F % , r "... ' City Manager COUNCIL COIMEMMU�'ICATION MEETING DATE: September 28, 1388 AGENDA TITLE: Approve C -Drainage Basin Redesign, Southeast Corner of Vine Street and Beckman Road RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council, after receiving the staff report and comments from the property owners involved, determine the appropriateness of the redesign of the C -Basin and provide staff with direction on how to proceed. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the request of Daryl Geweke, the City has redesigned the C -Drainage Basin Park. The cost of the redesign work was paid for by Mr. Geweke. The new drainage basin park design provides for similar recreational activities and facilities as the existing plan and it has been approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The major conceptual change in the redesign is in providing a S00 -foot setback from Beckman Road to any additional land needed for basin expansion. The setback on the existing plan is 200 feet. The total number of acres in the proposed redesign plan is 0.795 acres less than the existing approved plan. However, as part of the redesign it was necessary to expand the park site to the east and provide a deeper basin. The expansion to the east involves a new property owner, Briggs -Parker. The additional land needed for the redesign and the existing plan i s shown below and on the attached Exhibit A. Property Owner ) Existing Plan I Redesign Y.ettelman 10.000 Ac. 5.078 Ac. Bri ggs -Parker Nome 4.127 Ac. Tota 1 10.000 Ac . 9.205 Ac. Difference 0.795 Ac. Attached as Exhibit B is a letter dated August 23, 1988 sent to Daryl Geweke outlining the difference in the costs of the two park basin designs. APPROVED: —� PILE NO.. THOMAS A. PETERSON, City Manager CCBASIN3/TXTW.02M September 20, 1988 X. A. XAWRIN$ 11$S6.1lt S� J. w. AW K1N$ 11BSD•1959� LCWISXN. pAwK1NS JAACD W. ..AWK1N5. JA. HAWKIN S & HAWKINS ATTGANE+. AT LAW 1119.12•- 519CCT SUITE N... MOOCSTO. C&LIFORN1A 95354 September 14, 1985 Jack L_ Ronsko Public Works Director City of Lodi Box 3006 Loai, California 95241-1910 Gentlemen: Exh tibit C :[L[ -NONE S SD•166D A copy is enclosed of your letter of August 23, 1988 addressed to Daryl Geweke, re a "C - Drainage basin Redesign" which proposes to shift a taking of property from the Geweke land over onto property owned by my clients the Briggs family and Mildred Briggs Parker. The Briggs -Parker land has been in their family for more than a hundred years and by them is affectionately called Pixley Park after their forefather who owned the land. Lt. James Russell Briggs was a captain of a wagon train. In California he rented land from Captain Weber of Stockton before buying his own land, and ran freight from Stockton to the Southern Mines, Angels Camp, Sonora and Mariposa. H i s daughter, Mary Briggs married Rueben Pixley. Thus the Briggs and Pixley families were joined. Lt. Briggs assisted Rueben Pixley in selecting the land adjacent to the present Geweke property. At the outbreak of the Civil' War, Rueben Pixley volunteered in a California brigade which marched East to protect the freight, communication lines and Nevada mines from threatened or feared raids. Rueben and Mary Pixley built a two story mansion near the intersection of Kettleman Road and what will become the extention of Myrtle Avenue. They were the parents of Ora Whitaker, cousin of the present co-owner Mildred Parker and cousin of the Briggs owners. From the decez.sed Ora Pixley Whitaker, an interest in the property descended to the present Russell Briggs of Modesto, and through him to James Russell Briggs and other members of the Briggs family. The other 2/3 interest descended from Ora Pixley Whitaker to the present Mildred Briggs Parker. The parcel is referred to in the family as "Pixley Park" because of the beauty of the ancient gnarled grapes planted on the property. Rueben Pixley planted the first Tokav vineyard in that area in 1858, and planted the Zinfadel grapes in 1900, so they are a monsterously large and picturesquely beautiful. Mr. Jack L. Ronsko September 14, 1988 - Page 2 Briggs/Parker/Geweke The straight in logical place for access to the C Drainage basin is over the Geweke land. But Mr. Geweke apparently would prefer to save his frontage and only use his _arid in the back, and to shove the frontage over onto the Pixley Park property to the detriment of the Briggs and Mildred Parker. The Pixley Park property with the frontage is worth more per acre than the Geweke land in the back. Also, this proposed taking creates a severance problem in that there would he an irrigation and cultivation problem in the back of the Pixley Park where there is a small south end rectangle created of about 178 + feet by 200 + feet./ ZtiS .rec��•�le b�. Oor cnlcs s�+owr. f06. As a package, we propose the following: 1. Mr. Geweke purchase the South end small rectangle at the rate of $26,260.00 an acre or such large sun per acre that he may receive from the City of Lodi, or 2. In the altnernative, pay Briggs and Parker $15,000.00 severance damage, and they w i 11 keep the rectangle. 3. If Mr. Geweke purchases, then he shall do all engineering, parcel splits, and title work, escrow and other costs of conveyance at his expense. The purchase price is net to us. 4. We w i 11 then sell, frontage and all to the City of Eodi at the $26,260.00 an acre or such greater sum per acre as Mr. Geweke may receive; 5. Provided, however, that the park be named "Rueben and Mary Pixley Park." If the park is so named the family anticipates working with the City in the design of some appropriate small roofed structure as is often found in state parrs, exhibits and directory, which can be financed by the family. Thank you. LNH/bj s Yours very truly, HAWKINS & HAWKINS City Council September 28, 1988 Page 2 The agreement that vie presently have with Nk. Geweke is that he would pay for the redesigning of the basin plan which would meet his needs with respect to frontage depth on Beckman Road. Then, once the total additional costs were known, he would then either ask the City Council to approve the redesign or keep the existing plan in place. If he asks the City Council to approve the redesign, he would commit to paying all the additional costs. Mr. Geweke, most likely, trill not be in a position to ask the City Council to approve the redesigned plan without knowing the full costs. One of the unknowns i s what Briggs -Parker w i 1 i accept for their- land. These property owners are currently represented by Jim Jacobson of Sturman, Jacobson, Arbios Properties. I contacted Jim Jacobson last week and determined the property was on the market, however, he could not tell rre whether or not the property owners would accept the same per acre price that the City agreed to pay the Kettelmans. NIC Jacobson also indicated that Briggs -Parker were in the process of obtaining 'legal counsel. Monday, the City received a letter from the attorney representing Briggs -Parker. This letter is attached as Exhibit C. The City Attorney is contacting all the attorneys involved and will try to bring to the City Council meeting a solution agreeable to all parties. There appear to be three options available at this point, each with its Mn risks. First, the Council can do nothing and allow the issues of the :value and size of the land to be acquired from the Briggs -Parker interests to be resolved. This would result in probable increased costs to everyone as the land appreciates in value. It would also probably not be to the advantage of the Kettelmans, who are desirous of selling their property as soon as possible. Second, the City could build the original plan by acquiring the Kettelman property (possibly via eminent domain in order to avoid problems with Nr_ Geweke's option}. This would not accommodate Nk. Geweke's needs and it appears the Parks and Recreation staff would prefer the redesigned plan. Third, the City could go forward Ath acquisition of the Briggs -Parker property (assuming the present owner will sell prior to obtaining further appraisals). This would satisfy Nk Geweke's needs. If Xt Geweke is willing to accept responsibility for the increased costs, this would present the optimal scenario. However, if the Briggs -Parker owners are hesitant, it may be dangerous for the City to begin eminent domain proceedings, since the appraised value still has not been established. It may also beos s i bl a to reach an agreement with Nh Geweke that his extra costs would n a exc d a certain figure. (Jack-WRonsko Publi orks Director JLR/mt V�Wli Attachments cc: City Attorney Bob Elliott Parks & Recreation Director Gera] d Sperry Daryl Geweke Lewis Hawkins Orrin & Gertrude Kettelman Jim Jacobson ,...,,... . ....... ", ti:. : , ..,,..:� w _:.,.. f Exhibit A CCC�C 9 "03S a0 12 0(d 01-64-0 33S i V v;/O r.ba�✓n. 2 05 '3 66 u� 0 O � U j CITY COUNCIL ! Exhibit .B JAMES W PINKERTON_ Jr.. MaVor CITY OF L O D I t ALICE M. RE)MCiiE JOHNR. iRaocv; SNIDER City Clerk mavor Pro Tempore CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET DAVID %l HiNCKMAN CALL BOX 3006 BOB.McNATT EVELYN M.OLSON LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1 91 0 City AEtornev FRED m. RE 11) (209) 334-5634 TELECOPIER J-109) 333.6795 Aucust 23, 1988 Oa ry 1 Geweke Geweke Properties P.O. Box 1210 Lodi, CA 95241 SUBJECT: C -Drainage Basin Redesign The C -Drainage Basin redesign has been approved by the Parks and Recreation Com3nission and has been transmitted to the parties involved for comments. W have received no negative Comments on the redesign and me will be presenting this redesign to the City Council for its review next month. The my land acquisition requirements are shown on the attached map. The new acreage requirements are .795 acres less than the original design. However, prior to the Council approving the redesign project, "e feel that v4e should be providing them with your decision on committing to the additional costs, in addition to actual redesign costs, of this new plan. Listed below are the additional costs associated with the my C -Basin layout. Park development $30,C00 Street work 16,000 Fencing 3,700 Utilities reimbursement Wastewater 1,739 Water 1,760 Land .795 acre X 526,260/acre (-) 20,877 Subtotal $32,322 The proposed layout requires acquisition of land from an additional property owner. IF the naw property owner will not accept the same price per acre that has been offered to the Kettlemans, the following additional costs will be applicable: 1. Nw appraisal, title reports, etc. (approximately 52,700); 2. Difference in land acreage costs; and 3. Acquisition agent costs. LGEWEKE4/TXTW.OZM Daryl ueweke August 23, 1988 Page 2 Other minor additional unknown cosi would include: 1. �daition�l monument surveyzrc; =nd �. ncre? � ec cosTs of record of survey. r; G Jack Ronsko \,gnlija Wo& Director JLR/mt -nclosure c--: City Attorney Paris 8 Recreation Direc-ror Gerald A. Sperry, Attorney at Law Orrin D. Kettelman Bcb Attorney at Law Jim Jacobson LGE4EKc4/ i X74.021M C� cli LL .0101 .ji _ � - ��- \ `\\��{ \\\ lid \ �_ A ---------- 0 cvNt ---------- tj 51 CJ r4 L) N4 z ------------- i O NVA Y 02 E ON A rM A/9 /9 .31VLS THE REPRODUMON-OF. TIRS DOCUM1W CANNOr BE IMPROVED UJE,:,,�� TO ()MITICN OF rM ■mlu�: CITY COUNCIL JAMES W. PINKERTON. Jr.. Mayor CITY OF L O D I JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER Mayor Pro Tempore CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET DAVID M. HINCHMAN CALL ROK 3M6 EVEIYN M. OLSON LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 FRED PA, REID (209) 331-5634 TELECONIER : (209) 333-6795 September 21, 1988 FHOMAS A PETERSON City Manager ALICE M REIMCHE City Clerk link McN.ATT :City Attorney i - f' 11 I i ... ..'% SUBJECT: C -Drainage Basin Redesign, Southeast Corner of Vine Street and Beckman Road Dear Prcperty Owner/Resident: Enclosed is a copy of background inforn)ation on an item that will be discussed at the City Council meeting on Wednesday, September 28, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the City Council Chamber, 2nd Floor, City Hall, 221 West Pine Street. You are welcome to attend. If you wish to comment on this item at the meeting, please contact Alice Reimche, City Clerk, a t (209) 333-6702. If you have any questions about the item, please call rre at (209) 333-6706. (Jac L. Ronsko ✓� Publ c Works Director JLRJmt Enclosure cc: City Clerk I? cr ee , MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi. Public Works Department n'd� 8� S Gf��0e TO: City Manager City Attorney FROM: Publ is Works Director DATE : September 21, 1988 SUBJECT: C -Drainage Basin Redesign Costs It was brought to our attention that there may be an error in the cost of fencing under the attached cost comparison prepared by the City's landscape architect. In conferring with our architect, it was confirmed that there was an error in the estimate. This changes the difference in the two park plans from 930,000 to $13,000. Attached i s a copy of the revised estimate for park development. Also attached i s a revised copy of our August 23, 1988 letter to Daryl Geweke which totaled the difference in costs of the two plans. This modification changes the difference from $32,322 to the new total of $15,322. These figures are based on all property involved selling for $26,260 per acre. Upon the completion of the revised plan and grading plan by Richard Bigler, he will have spent all of the redesign funds originally provided by Geweke. Therefore, there will be no reimbursement from the $7,000 paid by Geweke to the City for redesign. It should be noted that staff, i .e. , Public Works Director, Parks and Recreation Director, City Attorney, Engineering and Parks and Recreation personnel, have not charged any of their time to this redesign project, Unless w are directed to do so, w will be donating this time to providing for a workable compromise in the C -Basin park layout. CDdskiDirector rks Director JLR/mt Attachments cc: Parks & Recreation Director Daryl Gmeke Orrin & Gertrude Kettelman Gerald Sperry Bob Elliott Lewis Hawkd ns Jim Jacobson MCM87/TXTW.02M _...._...._. --77— ....... _.._. _.—. w.r..n.b,�..�anp'±.vu+:+«m,++we!rhea.°'_..^..'�'-.�:-......__.......Mc....w.vww,.:�rwwr«•.aw+•.*�m+�ww:.:+.—._..._._:_..�_ ._ COST Cf AR I SOM, SOLUTION I AND 2 'C' BASIN PARK CITY OF LODI, CALIF_, The following Masterplan estimates are done without benqfit of construction documents and are subject to revision. The following cost do not include the following" Street and sicewalk improvements. Perimeter fences Fire nydrants Water & electric supply Site grading Pumping plant NEW ITEM QTY ITEM PLAN 1 QTY PLAN 2 1. 27.5 ACRES OF LAND NC 29.6 NC 2. 1 REC. BLDG 150,000 150,000 3. 1 MOTHER SHELTER 12,000 12,000 4. 1 GROUP SHELTER 87,000 87,G00 5. 1 PLAY GROUND AREA 6,000 6,000 6. PASS. PLAY EQUIPMENT 30,000 30,000 7. 2,600 sq>f t SOCCER BLEACHER 26,000 26,000 8. 5,200 sq<ft SOFTBALL BLEACHER 52,000 52,000 9. is SPORT LIGHTING 150,000 150,000 10. LS PARKING,SEC.LIGHTING 40,000 40,000 11. 2 SOFTBALL AREA TOTALS 60,000 60,000 12. 1 SOCCER EQUIPMENT 5,000 5,000 13. 64,000 sq>f t> PARKING & ASPHALT 160,000 81,000-203,000 14. LS4�1800 FIRE ROAD GRADING 510003q,o00 5,000 15. lin>ft CHAIN LINK FENCING 5,000' 40,000 16. 10 PICNIC BAR,B,Q 5,000 5,000 17. 27,000 sq>f t> CONC. WALKS 49,000 19,000' 35,000* EM 19,000 sq>ft> AIR STIP 33,000 33,000 19. LS BLDG AREA LANDSCAPE 30,000 30,000 20•. 12 ACRES TURF AND IRRIGATION 160,000 13-5 162,000 21. 14 ACRES NATURE AREA DEVELOP. 56,000 10.5 42,000 it 22. LS TREES AND SHRUBS 15,000 10,000 23. LS MARSH DEVELOPMENT 5.000 5.000 TOTALS 11,188,000 * AREAS OF COST DIFFERENCES. LS LUMP SCUM ' SQ.FT. OR LIN.FT. AS MAY APPLY. THE MAINTENANCE AREA AND BASKETBALL COSTS WERE NOT FACTORED IN AS THEY ARE ADDITTIONS TO THE PARK DESIGN NOT CONSIDERED IN THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT. COST DIFFERENCES ARE REFLECTED IN THE FOLLOWING: THE COST DIFFERENCES ARE COMEWHAT RELATIVE TO DESIGN CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF FACILITIES, RATHER THAN THE NEW SHAPE OF THE PARK. C�JAMES =' COUNCIL %% PINKERTON. IrtRandvt S% R ntavo• Pro t emuore DAVID M HINCHAtAN EVELYN M OLS0N FRED Nt nE10 Darv'• G�_ eke Geweke Properties P.O. Box 1210 Lodi, CA c=241 - THOMAS A PETERSON CITY OF L O D i Crty Manager ALICE nt P.EIMCHE CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET CttvClerk CALL BOX 3006 BOB MCNA-T LODI CALIFORNIA 952<1-1910 Ctty Attorney (209) 334-5634' / L TEtECOPIER 1.'"1333.6795 ��U61 August 23, 1988 " - l7TZ• T� SUBJECT: C -Drainage Easin Redesign The C -Drainage Basin redesign has been approved by the Parks and Recreation Cou-mission and has been transmitted to the parties involved for comments. We have received no negative comments on the redesign and vie will be presenting this redesign to the City Council for its review next month. The new land acquisition requirements are shown on the attached map. The new acreage requirements are .795 acres less than the original design. However, prior to the Council approving the redesign project, vie feel that vie should be providing them with your decision on committing to the additional costs, in addition to actual redesion costs, of this new plan. Listed below are the additional casts associated with the new C --Basin layout. 13,E Park development _5988 -Street 13'70Fenin ,0 Uti 1 i t i es reimbursemen; 1,739 Water 1,760 Land .795 acre X 525,260/acre i-) 20.877 t a<. Subtotal'—roc 1S,3z2 s: The proposed layout requires acquisition of land from an additional property owner. If the new property owner will not accept the same price per acre that has been offered to the hetilemans, the following additional costs will i h. be applicable: 1. New appraisal, title reports, etc. (approximately 52,700); 2. Difference in land acreage costs; and 3. Acquisition agent costs. LGEWEKE4/TXTW.02M :.;iV iLJid 4, Darvi Geweke Auoust Z3, 1988 Page 2 Other minor additional unknown costs would incluae: Additional monument surveying ; and 2. Inc costs of record of survey. � A dacRonsko ubli' Works Director JLR/mt nclosure cc: City Attorney Parks & Recreation Director Gerald A. Sperry, Attorney at Law Orrin D. Kettelman Bcb Elliot" Attorney at taw Jim Jacobson LGc,1EKE4�TW.02M MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi , Public Works Department TO: City Manager City Attorney FROM: Public Works Director DATA : Septe;nber 21, 1988 SUBJECT: C -Drainage Basin Redesign Costs d�'Pr 0/z e I t was brought to our attention that there may be an error in the cost of fencing under the attached cost comparison prepared by the City's landscape architect. In conferring with our architect, it was confirmed that there was an error in the estimate. This changes the difference in the two park plans from 530,000 to $13,000. Attached is a copy of the revised estimate for park development. Also attached is a revised ccpy of our August 23, 1388 letter to Daryl Geweke which totaled the difference in costs of the two plans. This modification changes the difference from $32,322 to the new total of $15,322. These figures are based on all property involved selling for $26,260 per acre. Upon the completion of the revised plan and grading plan by Richard Bigler, he will have spent all of the redesign funds originally provided by Geweke. Therefore, there will be no reimbursement from the $7,900 paid by Geweke to the City for redesign. It should be noted that staff, i .e. , Public Works Director, Parks and Recreation Director, City Attorney, Engineering and Parks and Recreation personnel, have not charged any of their time to this redesign project. Unless vie are directed to do so, vie will be donating this time to providing for a workable compromise in the C -Basin park layout. Jack L. oonsko Publc Wrks Director JLR/mt Attachments cc: Parks & Recreation Director Daryl Geweke Orrin & Gertrude Kettelman Gerald Sperry Bob Elliott Lewis Hawkins Jim Jacobson MCM87/TXTW.02M C I COST COMPARISOM, SOLUTION I AND 2 'C" BASIN PAS CITY OF LODI, CALIF_, The following Masterplan estimates are done without benefit of construction documents and are subject to revision. The following cost do not include the following" Street and sidewalk improvements. Perimeter fences Fire hydrants Water & electric supply Site grading Pumpina plant NEW ITEM QTY ITEM PLAN 1 QTY PLAN 2 1. 27.5 ACRES OF LAND NC 29.6 NC 2. 1 REC. BLDG 150,000 150,000 3. 1 MOTHER SHELTER 12,000 12,000 4. 1 GROUP SHELTER 87,000 87,000 5. i PLAY GROUND AREA 6,C00 69000 6. MISS. PLAY EQUIPMENT 30,000 30,000 7. 2,600 sq>ft SOCCER BLEACHER 26,000 26,000 S. 5,200 sq<ft SOFTBALL BLEACHER 52,000 52,000 9. LS SPORT LIGHTING 150,000 150,000 10. LS PARK ING,SEC.LIGHTING 40,000 40,000 11. 2 SOFTBALL AREA TOTALS 60,000 60,000 12. 1 SOCCER EQUIPMENT 5,000 5,000 13. 64, 000 sq>f t> PARKING & ASPHALT 160,000 91,000'203,000 14. LS4.800 FIRE ROAD GRADING 5,0003q o00 5,000 15. lin>ft CHAIN LINK FENCING � 5,000' 40,000* 16. 10 PICNIC BAR , B , Q 59000 5,000 17. 27,000 sq>ft> CONC. WALKS 49,000 19,000' 35,000 * 18. 19,000 sq>f t> AIR STIP 33,000 33,000 19. LS BLDG AREA LANDSCAPE 30,000 30,000 20•. 12 ACRES TURF AND IRRIGATION 160,000 13.5 162,000 * 21. 14 ACRES NATURE AREA DEVELOP. 56,000 10.5 42,000 22. LS TREES AND SHRUBS 15,000 10,000 23. LS MARSH DEVELOPMENT 5.000 5,000 TOTALS 1,1889000 1 , i l S, 000 * AREAS OF COST DIFFERENCES. LS LUMP SUM ' SQ.FT. OR LIN.FT. AS MAY APPLY. THE MAINTENANCE AREA AND BASKETBALL COSTS WERE NOT FACTORED IN AS THEY ARE ADDITTIONS TO THE PARK DESIGN NOT CONSIDERED IN THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT. COST DIFFERENCES ARE REFLECTED IN THE FOLLOWING: THE COST DIFFERENCES ARE COMEWHAT RELATIVE TO DESIGN CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF FACILITIES, RATHER THAN THE NEW SHAPE OF THE PARK. -carr CIT:' COUNCIL LAMES yv PINKERTON. Ir. Mayor ERandv) SNIDER Ma„or Pro lemvorr DAVID M HINCHMAN EVELYN -, OLSON FRED M REID Daryl Geweke Geweke Properties _ ?.0. Box 1.210 Lodi, CA 95,241 SUBJECT: C -Drainage Basin Redesion The C -Drainage Basin redesign has been approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and has been transmitted to the parties involved for comments. W have received no negative comments on the redesign and ve will be presenting this redesign to the City Council for its review next month. The n2w land acquisition requirements are shown on the attached map. The new acreage requirements are .795 acres less than the original design. However, prior to the Council approving the redesign project, vie feel that vie should be providing them with your decision on committing to the additional costs, in addition to actual redesign costs, of this new plan. Listed below are the additional costs associated with the new C' -Basin layout. l3 .Gx-p _ Park development ;9'009 -Street work 16,000 Fencing 3,700 _ Uti lines reimbursement Wastewater 1,739 Water 1,760 Land .795 acre X 526,260/acre (-} 20.877 Subtotal 532,322- 15.3z-4 The proposed layout requires acquisition of land from an additional property owner. If the new property owner will not accept the same price per acre that has been offered to the Kettlemans, the following additional costs will be appticable: 1. New appraisal, title reports, etc. (approximately S2,700); 2. Difference in land acrrage costs; and 3. Acquisition agent costs. LGEWEKE4/TXTW.02M THO++AS A PEIERSON CITY OF L O D I. Crty Manage, ALICE „c REIMCHE CGty Clerk CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET CALL BOX 30% BO6 MCNAT T LODI, CALIFORNIA 9521-1910 Gly Attorney (209) 334.563; TELECOPIER (20+91333.6795 / AUQUSt 23, 1888 SUBJECT: C -Drainage Basin Redesion The C -Drainage Basin redesign has been approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and has been transmitted to the parties involved for comments. W have received no negative comments on the redesign and ve will be presenting this redesign to the City Council for its review next month. The n2w land acquisition requirements are shown on the attached map. The new acreage requirements are .795 acres less than the original design. However, prior to the Council approving the redesign project, vie feel that vie should be providing them with your decision on committing to the additional costs, in addition to actual redesign costs, of this new plan. Listed below are the additional costs associated with the new C' -Basin layout. l3 .Gx-p _ Park development ;9'009 -Street work 16,000 Fencing 3,700 _ Uti lines reimbursement Wastewater 1,739 Water 1,760 Land .795 acre X 526,260/acre (-} 20.877 Subtotal 532,322- 15.3z-4 The proposed layout requires acquisition of land from an additional property owner. If the new property owner will not accept the same price per acre that has been offered to the Kettlemans, the following additional costs will be appticable: 1. New appraisal, title reports, etc. (approximately S2,700); 2. Difference in land acrrage costs; and 3. Acquisition agent costs. LGEWEKE4/TXTW.02M a i Daryl Geweke Auoust 1-988 Paoe 2 Other minor additional unknown costs would include: 1. Additionai monument surveying ; and 2. Increed costs o' record of survey. ;Jack 1 . Ronsko Works Director JLR/mt Enclosure cc: City Attorney ?arks & Recreation Direr=or Gerald A. Sperry, Attorney a t Law Orrin D. Kettelman Bob Elliott, Attorney at Law Jim Jacobson LOc4'KE4/TXTW.OZM