HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 7, 1988 (88)C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T L O N
TO: THE CITY OJJNM COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SfPIEMBER 7, 1988
FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE-
SUBJECT:
FFICE
SUBJECT: MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTI FICATIOW PROGRAM (DISCUSSIGN AND APPROPRIATE ACIION)
GENERAL OVERVIEW
The Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, authorized by Congress in the Tax Reform
Act of 1984, is an alternative to mortgage revenue bond -backed financing as a
means of providing financial assistance to avera e -income families for the
purchase of single-family housing. In 1985, the State of California adopted
legislation authorizing cities and counties to make Mortgage Credit Certificates
available in their communities.
MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATE
The MCC is a federal tax credit. The MCC tax credit reduces the federal income
taxes of qualified borrowers purchasing modTstly priced homes, thus having the
effect of subsidizing their monthly mortgage payments. For example, a borrower
with a 10%fixed rate 30 -year mortgage of $90,000 would make $790.00 in mortgage
payments each month. By using a 20% MCC, $158, (20% of $790) of the monthly
payment can be taken as a tax credit toward that buyer's Federal income tax
I iabi Ii ty.
The JRS and state agencies have established program guidelines which set the
nudnun sales price for new and existing units, as well as the maximum household
income of the home purchasers. These limits are different for each city and
county and are periodically revised based upon what should be average for the
area; the limits for Lodi are $101,000 for a newly constructed home and $85,000
for an existing, previously occupied home assuming a median household income cf
$28,600 for the city.
PROGRAM ADMIN I STRATION
The MCC Program can be implemented in-house or on contract; larger cities,
particularly in Southern California often implement i t in-house. Smal ler cities
and counties have foind it to their advantage to utilize outside housing
consultants, such as CFN Financial Services. If an outside consultant were used
the City's role in administering MCC' s would only include promotion and
coordination of the program.
r
City Council
September 7, 1988
Page 2
and Tandy Ranch, starting in the low $120,000's and $140,000's respectively.
Schaefer, Suess and Boyd Realtors estimates the median new hcxne is selling for
$150,000 to $169,000 in Lodi.
There are some existing, preoccupied homes in Lodi sel i i ng under $85,000 though
concrete numbers are not available. The Lodi Board of Realtors does provide a
median selling price of $122,573 for a resale horn which suggests that the number
of homes that qualify for this program -is probah'iy not significant.
This r-ogram is unique because it is not restricted to low and moderate income
categories and includes average income persons. However, the unavaila—bfl ity of
any new homes priced within the MCC's limit and the moderate number of eligible
resale homes means the program will likely not have troch of an impact in Lodi.
Staff feels the MCC Program would be ineffective here and recommends that '"C do
not adopt the program at this time.
Nq i3. SCNR &Z
L�G_
uriily Devel opmerit Director
x
FINANCIAL SERVICES
Public Finance Division
-e_ " - I
_C� � C2
P.O. Bei:_ 3006
Lodi CA, 95-241-1910
SUBJECT: MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATION PRO(;R.T�M
_CI;Zr I rLd:
Th letter is to make you aware of an Opportunity for your
citv.to nake Homeownership a realty for average income nor.. --e
buy ers. if y,ur City Council acts, ycu can ensure thatmoicra-,e
families realize tha unique American Dream of Homeownership and
at the sane tine bene -fit your local Builders, Realtors, a r.d
Lendei.
140Ri. CREDIT CERTIFICATES
n 19t3" +_-he- U.S Congress adopted ai,.-.endn, tints to Ta. I'xamp
Bondd ri,"- !Zc-ula-1--irns:,,vjliichi7,among other things, enactefA a ._w V,
of tan.:.: _;redit known -as the, Mortgaga Credit Certificate (SACC)
Rather than issuing.. Tax -Exempt- Revenue B.ortds..
B ities and ', Codnties are- . 'now
nodorate-income..'� Home, , uyers, :C
pern-_cted tc issue XC .o eligible average income houz:fLolaS C.0
the nurchase of For tne, - typ 1 ca.L cit"71
first � home. In,
Ncrtl rn California-;`_ _.hotir�eholds:earnin )Orj annua-` I
Up
i:000
a re eac 1 6'
T UP
I-ur6.� S,
iase �ane;iis ing, :constructed hom 6' e r --un d`
()00.
"101,
old ent3LILI-es th, e t a--
-i MCC to a it, averr o
ars ige, household
.�Ssuancc_ ,of
t up to $-2 1 000 -ia4 r,
-for-dallar Tax"Credi �:.of,
1-11 ar on,.tl
-h-; n:�.-turn c[reat'v assistsinthe' -iii -neetinq� tb
icon, e axes.. �L i
oan-auali i cA ti a -quir emen-Es 6f pr_ivate:.lendcfri-� iwe i
available,
. . . . . . . . . ------
Effective,' Frac 'cal' a n. d JL- -kc--om.-plisheZ exactlyUh
designed tol�,,,,rovicie. s ignificant F Lna--c Assistance ��to avC�r_a�C.3e.,
" �i t t r s --,home.
h las: ai 0: r
ric house, 0- bUVX.IC
?income
41st U F
S ta: Cruz Californiai95062
462-2646
rti
.7, .
OF ffS N
kJ
-
CANOW-7�,"
J
An MICC program requires an i nit.ial action k v '�+011r city COui1i11 ` O
start the prcgram. Next, }'^,u'_' local BLI.L1-erS, Realtors, a :'d
tl-
Lenders are made •:arc- ot t i ava'la:,)_s.it,
1SSLIZnte of indiviUual .`'!l _ ln-cor porc:tedt in chl—i'_ i:iting,
Oell.,.n g and Financing prccedur,-�s.L.3 s \' ti. 'N --Cs ar? issued to
qualified hoLiepurciiasers as authorized bv yourjuric
sd_tion.
i
CFN FINANCIAL SERVICES, PUBLIC FINANCE DI's%ISIOl3
. i
'ms�
s J ;
DOaM CA Or r
r I
T
C 0 o N C I L
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
C O M M U N I C A 1 S O N
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AUGUST 17, 1988
SUBJECT: MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (1)1SC'USSION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION)
G.EN1RA1 OVERVIEW
The Mortgage
Credit
Certificate
Program, authorized by Congress in the Tax Reform
Act of 1984,
is an
alternative
to mortgage revenue bond -backed financing as a
means of providing
financial
assistance for the purchase of single-family
housing. In
1985, the
State of
California adopted legislation authorizing cities
and counties
to make
Mortgage Credit Certificates available in their communities.
The MCC is a federal tax credit. The MCC tax credit reduces the federal income
taxes of qualified borrowers purchasing modestly priced homes, thus having the
effect of subsidizing their monthly mortgage payments. For example, a borrower
with a 10%fixed rate 30 -year mortgage of $90,000 would make $790.00 in mortgage
payments each month. W using a 26% MCC, $158, (20% of $790) of the monthly
payment can be taken as a tax credit toward that buyer's Federal income tax
liability.
The IRS and state agencies have established program guidelines which set the
maxnnum sales price for new and existing units, as well as the maxnnum household
income of the home purchasers. These limits are different for each city and
county and are periodically revised; the limits for Lodi are $101,000 for a newly
constructed home and $85,000 for an existing, previously occupied home assuming a
median household income of $28,600 for the city.
PROGRAM ADMIN IRA1IO�T
The MCC Program can be implemented in-house or on contract; larger cities,
particularly in Southern California often implement it in-house. Smaller cities
and counties have found it to their advantage to utilize outside housing
consultants, such as CFN Financial Services.
BACKGROUND Il4URMATION
The City of Lodi has no new single-family homes selling for under the MCC
Program's limit of $101,000. The lowest priced new units are in Johnson Ranch and
Tandy Ranch, selling in the low $120,000's and $140,000's respectively. Schaefer;
Suess and Boyd Realtors estimates the median new home is selling for $150,000 to
$1.6,0,000 in Lodi .
There are sone existing, preoccupied homes in Lodi selling under $85,600 though
rnnrrPtanumhc rs are not available. The Lodi Board of Realtors does provide a
median selling price of $122,573 for a resale home which suggests that the number
of homes ti at qualify for this program is probably not significant.
CC23/TXTD.01C August 1.1,:1988
.xa. t ,w v. .w,�s*rKat✓YSvr�r-w+.c` .a.:,aYt. wwmr:. �s+s*?.kms` k''a,.
,rrr ri
City Council
September 7;--1988
Page 2
CONCLUSION
This program is unique because it is not restricted to low and moderate income
categories and includes average income persons. However. the unavailability of
any new homes priced within the MCC's limit and the moderate number of eligible
resale homes means the program will likely not have raich of an impact ir. Lodi.
Staff feels the MCC Program would be ineffective in Lodi and recommends Lhat we do
not adopt the program at -this'-time.
t
JAS B. SCHRdEf)ER
I muni ty Development Director
1