The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - September 6, 1989 (76)•_ r% i -ry c ie-,% r% i WAY I `.,11 I VF Lk.JUI %V PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: City Council FROM: City Manager MEETING DATE: September 6, 1989 AGENDA TITLE: 1989-90 Transportation Development Act Claim RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the City's 1989-90 Transportation Development Act, "TDA", claim for local transportation funds, "LTF", and State Transit Assistance, "STA", and authorize the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND_ MRMATION The City's 1989-90 TDA claim requests all of the LTF apportionment which amounts to $987,890 and the STA apportionment which is $4,927. It is estimated that vie will be using approxim toy $325,00p of LTF and all of the STA money for the Dial -a -Ride system. nc�uded in this amount is the purchase of replacement vehicles in the amount of $76,500. TDA funds are used in conjunction with other street funds for the This transportation improvement program and maintenznce of our streets. claim includes work in progress projects as well as street projects that are expected to be included in the capital improveme t plan which will e the LTF. Projects are shown on the attached list. Snhowing these proJec -; on our claim allows us the flexibility to use TDA funds. It does not approve these jec for c truction. The pedestrian and bicycle apportionment, r '��,305t.�0, w1 e on the City sidewalk upgrading program together with other funds. Since this project includes pedestrian safety, it meets the requirements of this portion of the claim. A complete claim form of this communication. f r r Jack L. Ronsko Public Works Direc or JLR/SB/lw Attachment APPROVED: is in the City Manager's file but not included as part erry L. Glenn Assistant City Manager FILE Y0. f 3 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address; Call Box .006, Lodi, CA 95241 (City, Zip) Contact Person: Sharon Biaufus Phone: 333-6706 TRANSIT: Jerry Glenn 333-6700 The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual. transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1,778,750 for fiscal year 1989-90 , to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best' of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: PETER D. VERDOORN Title: Executive Director Date: 19 -5- Applicant: Uf; of Lodi --i Signed, . —71&= Name: Thomas A. Peterson Title: City P•lanager Date: _ we . E'a 19Rct STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAI TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City o f Lodi Address:- Call Box 3005, Lodi , CA 95241 (City, zip) Contact Person: Jerry Glenn Phone: 333-6706 This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and -applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 4,927 for fiscal year 1989-90 , to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Amounts Dial -a -Ride $4,927 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. San Joaquin County Council of Governments By : PETER D. VERDOORN Title: Executive Director Date: 19 Applicant: -6- Signe&:'-'� Name. Thomas A. Peterson Title: City Manager Date: JSgO'i". t 119 89 I. Local Transportation Fur. -i Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1989-90 $ 926,652 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 1.9,3(75 C. Previous Years` Unclaimed Apportionment 411933 D. Unexpended Carryover _ 7 0,900 E. Total Available for 1989-90 Claim(s) 1,778,790 F. less any LTF Already Claimed 1989-90 8 G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 1,778,790 (Also enter on page 8, 1st column) II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1989-90 $ B. Special Transit Apportionment 1989-90 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 4,927 D. Unexpended Carryover 9 E. Total Available for 1989-90 Claim(s) 4,922 F. less any STA Already Claimed 1989-90 G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 4+927 (Also enter on page 8, 2nd column) -7- TRANSPORTATION UYAWEKEU claim Purvose I. LTF 11. STA I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Article 4 (99260) -Operator 248,873 4,927 Article 8 (99400(c)) Contractor operating Article 8 (99400(e)� Contractor capita 46,500 II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE N/A Article.3 (99234) Article 8 (99400(a)) 19,305 i III. ROADS AND STREETS Article 8 (99400 (a)) 1,464,112* IV. OTHER.. � Article 8 (99400(b) N/A ..or 99400(d) r TOTAL THIS, CLAM 1.778.790 4,927 � TOTAL AVAILABLE: E: FOR THIS CLAIM (tzom ,page . and I I . G . ) 1.778.790 4, 927 UNCLAIMED'AFRQRTIONMENT (TOTAL. AVAIL: less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) 8 8 t IMPORTANT: TO avoid accidental overpayment, please identify in the space below any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed above, i *Roads and Streets includes 5790,900 of unexpended L.TF money. -8- PART I - PUBLIC-MkNISPORTLATIOPi Please Circle either: Article 4 gperator Q= Article 8 contractor �-- FINANCIAL INFORMATION TOTAL -9- 1988-89 ase Circle 1989-90 I. OPFRATING REVENUE ACTUAL t-. Budget 39,450 40,500 401 Passenger Fares 402 Special Transit Fares 403 School Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues 407 Non—Transportation Revenues 1,225 1,200 408 Taxes Levied Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund 226,460 248,873 • (LTF) 410 Local -Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) State Transit Assistance 6,550 4,927 Fund (STA) 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services 440 MAM SALE OF PROPERTY 1.600 REBOURSEMENTS TOTAL 4,658 280,343 295,500 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) Zr :al Capital Provisions (Specify) 46,500 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) iE�lt(f13(�2i�S3oriX 30.000 SALE OF PROPERTY 76,500 TOTAL -9- III. OPERATING EXPENSES 501 Labor Operators Salaries/Wages Other Salaries/wages 502 Fringe Benefits 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other 505 Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 5091 Miscellaneous Expenses 510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense -512 _ Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amorti-vation Operator Funds Grant Funds TOTAL IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles Construction Other TOTAL 1988-89 �Pi�ear4e Circle 1989-90 Actual.crr-E• Budget 750 250 49,793.75 60,000 _ 210,446.80 232,500 2,234.23 2,000 262,474.78 296,500 30.303.97 72.000 4,500 30,303.94 76,500 *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants: see 99400 (e). -10- OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Actual/]a=. Proposed FY 1987-88 FY 1988-89 FY 1989-90 1. patronage 76,207 70,842 75,000 a, Total Passengers 5,510 4,935 6,000 b. Revenue Passengers C. Youth Passengers 70,697 66,907 69,000 d. Elderly Passengers e. Handicapped Passengers 2. Vehicle Miles 140,069 141,767 142,000 a. Total Vehicle Miles h Rauan»o Revenue Vehicle Miles yah i n 1 0 our5_ . Revenue Vehicle Fuel .consn=ion a. Diesel b. Gasoline 13,819• 13,714 13,800 C. Liquid Natural compressed Gas 5. Fare Structure .50 .50 a Base .50 b. Zone C. Youth d. Senior .50 .50 .50 e. Handicapped .50 .50 .50 f. Monthly Pass g. Other 1.00 1.00 1.00 h. Average Fare .54 .54 .54 *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- Operating Expenses Operating Revenues Sources: LTF STA Revenue Federal sources: LTF Fares General Fund Other DMFF VFAR Fjr CAL PUN 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 S 313,000 g 330,000 $ 350,000 g 269,800 $ 285;800 $ 293,440 42,000 43,000 44,250 1,200 1,200 1,200 S S �$ -12- Tota: capital Expenses Capital Revenue sources: LTF :.` STA Federal Other Total DMFF VFAR Fjr CAL PUN 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 S 313,000 g 330,000 $ 350,000 g 269,800 $ 285;800 $ 293,440 42,000 43,000 44,250 1,200 1,200 1,200 S S �$ -12- FLEET INVENTORY (Transit Vehicle Owners Only) *********(SEE ATTACHED SHEET)********** sake & Model Production Year Chev. Impala 1985 Chev. Caprice 1985 Chev. Caprice 1986 Chev. Impala 1982 Dodge Caravan 1989 TOTAL Station wagon I of Fuel Seat =i al l Features I EP WC Other Veh. Type capacity I►C 1 gas 6 X Station wagon 3 gas 6 X Station wagon 1 gas 6 X Station wagon 1 gas 6 X Station wagon 2 gas 7 X VAN Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 1989-90 VAN ( 1 Station wagon 4 Station wagon 2 AC = Air Conditioned EP = Environmental Package WC = Wheelchair Lift -13- See attachment --------------- Attachment to Page - 13 - of Fleet Inventory Fiscal Year 1989-90 TDA Claim I t i s the intent o f th e C i t y o f Lodi t o purchase from Dial -A -Ride the two Dodge Caravans. These vehicles are inadequate for our present usage. VST intend to purchase four station wagons in the 1989-90 fiscal year. Two of these will be to replace the vans. Two of the vehicles will be used to replace the oldest and most expensive vehicles either as an addition to the fleet or as a replacement of an existing vehicle. The handicap van and two station wagons are included in an amendment to the 1988-89 claim. The handicap van and one station wagon will be an addition to the fleet. The other station wagon will replace the 1982 Impala station wagon. 5. µ' 1. Article 4 Operator TDA Requirements Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements All Article 4 claimants are required to maintain a specified ratio of fare revenue to operating cost. In addition, S11TD only is required to maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus local support to operating cost of 322. See 99268.2 99268.19 for details and exemptions pertaining to ratiDs. A. What is W s system's required farebox recovery ratio? B. Does the attached budget demonstrate that this system will meet its required farebox recovery and for SMTD its farebox plus local support ratios? Yes C. Has this system utilized its grace year? D. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required ratio(s)? no If yes, identify the year or years 2. Extension of Service/New Service An extension of service or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service or new service has been in operation for less than two full fiscal years. The two- year extension of services exclusion applies until two years after the end of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put into operation. B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of ser- vices to the COG within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)). No Is an extension of service/new service being*claimed? If so, has the required report been submitted for the most recently completed full fiscal year? If not, that report must accompany this claim. -14- H 3. Fifteen Fercent Expenditure Increase (6632) if any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15%the expenditure for that same item in the pre- vious year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach en extra page if necessary. The addition to the fleet will require additional expense for insurance. The purchase of four replacement vehicles necessitates the addition of capital funds. 4. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe in the space below any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of mayor new fixed facilities. Please attach an additional page if necessary. t SPECIAL NOTES FOR RATIO CALCULATIONS SMTD - Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most recent Conol iance Audit Reno=. Lodi - Exclude County service when calculating fares and expenses. -is- Article 6 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin county Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 99405(c). The COG Board ha5 established a two-step process. 1. Match Requirement For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA' (LTF and STA) derived. The ten percent or more match- ing funds may come from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA com- bined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claimant must establish an ooeratinv cost r)er Pas- senaer obiectiv'e for the fiscal year of the claim. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance\, but. should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when 'warranted. The COG Executive Board will adopt the systemwideoperating cost per passenger objective for the fiscal year 0�\ the claim. If the system failed tomeet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal, year prior to the fiscal year of the claim, then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim for the level of TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In the case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited. to the prior year's level of 'IDA operating funding. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a future fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. i. What was the level of 'IIIA operating funding received in the previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF plus STA)? $ ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds?',,, iii. Is this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were received for this system by this claimant in the previous fiscal year? `. iv. If yes, did the system meet its operati.ng%.cost per passenger objective in the previous fiscal, year? An affirmative answer should be documented in Part v. on the next page. -16- V. What w a s last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Objective? What was the actual operating cost per passenger? . FY 1988-89 Operating Cost S b. Total Passengers C. Operating Cost Per Passenger (a / b) $ vi. What is the,.Operating Cost per Passenger objective for this claim? . . . d. Budgeted Operating Cost S e. Estimated Total Passengers f. Calculated Operating Cost per Passenger e) S g. FY 1989-90 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE\ $ h• If this claim is for `a unified transit system (see footnote), has this contributing claimant been appraised of the planned \systemwide objective set in g. above? 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (61632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that\ ame item in the previous year's budget, then an explanatioe for that increase must be given below. Attach an additional page if necessary. 4. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe on an attached page any changes in\ service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Thi should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. IMPORTANT: If this claim is for a unified transit system (per definition p. 17a), all calculations and numbers on (2)iv. and (2)v. must include both City and County totals. Also, contribut- ing claimants to unified transit systems should not use this page: use page 17a instead. -17- CLE 8 CONTRACTOR TDA REQUIREMENTS (CONTRIBUTING CLAIMANTS) I. Isf the case of a "unified transit system," this page is to be use by the "contributing claimant" rather than page 17. A "unit`ked transit system" is defined as one which has the same fare 9iructure throughout the service area, but whose TDA are claimed separately by two different TDA claim- ants. A itionally, to qualify as a unified transit system, all syster TbA funding must be claimed under Article 8 (both claimants)• "Contributing claimant" is defined as the claim- ant contributing a minority of the unified transit system's TDA funds. The claimant furnishing the majority of TDA funds is defined as the "primarl claimant." Currently, the following local transit services qualify as unified transit systems: 0 Unified Transit Systems FY 1989-� � This Pae Used by 2. 3. Tracy Trans \y Tracy Taxi \ Escalon Public Transit System Name of unified transit 67 tet Systemwide operating nnat p•- passenger c'b;--ctive for FY 1989-90 identified in primacy claimant's adopted transit claim (from that claim, pagL\17, (2) vi. g.) Date of primary claimant's ndbpted transit claim (or anticipated future date, if not,yet adopted) '[PORTANT : \ County County r )unty The operating cost per passenger objective identified in 3• above will be applied uniformly to the total orf city and County TDA funds used by the unified transit system, to determine eligibility for increased TDA funding as%explai.ned on page 16. Separate calculations gill n= be done k o r City and County. -17a- PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND ptoiect Title and Description Pro!ec� Sidewalk Upgrading I Varies T.T1(„`pest Total Cost 19,305 50,000' r� K' ... : -. � W. r � STA'E TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND . . A ,., Wn >:_ .:. JiGT.�.-'. >`yj,er=rand Descrivtzon P�-o'iect_Linits To al Cost N r PART III - ROAD AND SEE': FRO.TE^1'S Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Traffic Signals (FAU Match) (FAU Match) Hutchins Street Improvements Lower Sacramento Rd. Operational Improvements (FAU match) Pine Street Overlay Stockton Street Overlay Lodi Ave._/Nam .Lane Intersection Overlay Lodi Ave. Overlay Lodi Ave. Overlay Church St. Overlay *Work in progress STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND Project Title and Description LIF cost Victor ltd. & Cluff Ave. S 90,000 Lodi Ave. & '_uwer Sacramento F 18,000 Elm St. &Lower Sacramento Rd. 18,000 Turner Rd. & Stockton St. 81,000 Tokay S t . to Lodi Ave. 300,000 Lodi Ave. to Pine St. 75,000 St. Mortiz to Turner Rid. 30,000 'SPRR to Cherokee Lane 223,000 Lodi Ave. to Lockeford St. 176,000 19,000 Beckman to Kelly 25,000 Main to Central 152,000 `Highway 12 to Mendicino 71,G00 (Use Additional Page if Necessary) (Use -19- STA Cost`: Total Cost . I page i= Necessary) PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND projectTit12 and Description Harney Lane Overlay Lockeford S t . Overlay Hlrn Lane Overlay & Operational Improvements Pacific Ave. Overlay Walnut & Oak S t . Overlay Tokay St. Voerlay Railroad Crossing Improvements Overlay Analysis/Design Street Master Plan Street Maintenance *'Work in progress 'Hutchins to 400' w/Stockton 'SPRR to Cherokee Ln. 'Highway 12 to Vine St 'Walnut to Elm 'Ham to Pacific Lower Sacramento to Mills 'Loma I3 'Cherokee Ln. Cluff Ave. (Use Page (Use Additional page -19- iiorat Total Cgst 75,000 115,000 195,000 95,000 83,000 8,000 9,000 12,000 6,000 20,000 149,555 ssary) Necessary) PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Title and Descripti Administration LSF Cost (Use Additional page if I -19- Necessary) (Use Additional Page if (Use Additional page if I -19- PART IV - OTHER PURPOSES It is possible that a claimant may wish to expend TDA funds for purposes allowed within the Act, but not covered by the three previous parts. For instance, TDA funds may be claimed under Article 8, 99400(b) to subsidize AMTRAK service in a community, or under 99400(d) for administration and planning costs foz 4agiftigy 8th c€er e�urva$e CeFP�enroie�e rbst169t@@ cost,, and the fund from which money is being claimed. It is advisable to communicate with COG staff before completing this section. -20- RESOLUTION NO. 89-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE CITY OF LODI'S 1989-90 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUMY) BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby approve the City's 1989-90 Transportation Developrnent Act (TDA) claim for Local Transportation Funds (LTF), and State Transit Assistance (STA); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the subject Claim on behalf of the City of Lodi. Dated: September 6, 1989 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 89-115 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a; regula meeting held September 6, 1989 by the following vote: Ayes : Council Members - Hinchman, Olson, Pinkerton, Reid and Snider (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Alice M, Reimche City Clerk 89-115 RES89115/TXTA.02J M