Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - April 19, 1989 (63)4. A LI! Y Ur LU L1l PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: City Council FROM: C i t y Manager MEETING DATE: April 19, 1989 AGENDA TITLE: Report on Paving Stones in Downtown Area (Report Only) RECOMMENDED ACTION: None. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Public Wars Department is in the process of performing the final check of the downtcwn paving stones installed as part of the United Downtown Improvement District (01D) project. The stones were installed in 1984 and the specifications included a requirement for a five-year warranty bond in the amount of $42,000. The bond was provided by Reliance Insurance Cly for the paving stone subcontractor, Mumbert Pipe Co. Inc., dba Specialty Paving System. The warranty, which will expire an August 10, 1989, states that: "...the installed paving stones will remain intact and free from settlement, breakage and uplifting". Neither the warranty nor the specifications included any specific limits on settlement. In September 1985, the City notified the prime contractor, Claude C. Wood Corr, that some concrete and raving worm needed to be corrected and that some o the paving stones had settled; however, a decision as to what should be done with the paving stones was deferred. In August 1986, Claude C. Wood Carry was notified that work on the paving stones at a few locations needed to be done immediatelZ and some should wart until late in the warrantyperiod (see attached letter) This letter indicated an acceptable amount of ettlement was 1/20. This was based on ride quality and some allowance for future settlement. As a point of reference, the City's sidewalk maintenance policy states that vertical offsets of less than 3/'4" need not be patched. The work called for in the August 1986 letter was completed in late 1987. City staff has recently examined all the paving stone installations. I t was noted that, in most cases, settlements were not significantly higher than in 1986. The defects found are listed below and referenced on the attached key map. A. Pine/ Sacramento, west crosswalk - 1/2" to 1"+ settlement B. Pine/ Sacramento, northeast corner - 1/2" settlement at curb near signal CPAVING/TXTW.02M April 12, 1989 I _, Paving Stones April 19, 1989,-.: Page 2 C. Pine/Church, north crosswalk - 1/2" settlement in wheel path D. Pine/Church inside fillet at 3 corners - I/2" settlement E. East side of School, alley north of Bm - settlement is uniform but water valve riser is now above the stones F. Elm/School , east crosswalk - 1/2" to 5/8" settlement G. Elm/School , south crosswalk - minor settlement less than 1/2" H. East side of School, -"Iley north of Pine - 1/2"+ settlement at curb & back of alley approach I. Pine/School , west crosswalk - two broken/chipped stones J. Pine/School, south crosswalk - 5/8" to 1" wheel path settlement K Pine/School , northeast corner - 1/2"+ settlement L. Pine/School, east crosswalk - less than 1/2" wheel path settlement K Oak/School - east, south & west crosswalks - 1/2" to 1" wheel path & general settlement N. Walnut/School, east & west crosswalks - 1/2" to 5/8" settlements, broken stone 0. Walnut/School , southeast corner - raised/settled stones, some due to previous repair P. East side of School, alley north of Lodi - 3/4" to 1" settlement Q. Lodi/School , northeast corner - less than 1/2" settlement R. Lodi /School , northwest corner - 3/4" settlement at curb, 3/4" wheel path settlement There are maty minor defects which rrny present an appearance problem, but are not a safety or maintenance problem. Given the nature of paving stones and the. chance that repairs may not appreciably improve the e i ting condition, it is I recommended the nunber of repairs be minimized. Not a11s the defects listed will t require repair. Other areas, such as the alley approach on the west side of School Street north of Elm, look very bad. However, the problem is due to the poor sidewalk, curb, and alley paving which was not replaced as part of the DuwrAmn project due to cost considerations. 1 CPAVING/TXTW.02M April 12, 1989 t (:itv t_niinril Paving Stones April 19, 1989 Page 3 All the defects listed will be evaluated as to and appearance. A list of recommended repairs the City Council in May 1989. ZL Jack L. Ronsko c Wags Director JLR/RCP/mt A ttachments cc: Street Superintendent Claude C. V«nd C mVW Muller Supply Lodi Downtown Business Association El CPAVING/TXTW.02M degree of hazard, ride quality, will be developed and presented to CITY COLINCU FRED M RE ID Mayor EVELYN M OLSON Mayor Pro Tempore DAVID M HINCHMAN )AMES W PINKERTON, It IOHN R (Randy) SNIDER CITY OF LOM CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET CALL BOX 3Q06 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209) 334-5634 August 6, 1986 Claude C. Wood Co. P.O. Box 599 Lodi, CA 95241 SUBJECT: U D I D Project I NOMAS A PE T E RSON C,tv ,Manage! ALICE M REI&ACHE City Clerk RONALD M ST E IN City Attorney An inspection was recently made of the Interlocking Paving Stones on this project by Harold Raverty and myself. After riding over most of the crosswalks and measuring the settlement of the stones, vc determined that 1/2" of settlement was a reasonable "break point". V% then string -lined all of the crosswalks and recorded those that were 1/2" (00.041 or more, except for the westernmost crosswalk at Sacramento and Pine Strnet, A copy of our observations is included for your use. Five areas should have your immediate attention; two low areas at the extreme end of the crosswalk at Lodi Avenue are a tripping hazard; the alley on the east side of School, north of Lodi Avenue, has a large settlement and tends to pond water; the paving stones In the sidewalk at" the southeast corner of Walnut and School has a sma 11 failed area; and the retainer curbing in the westernmost crosswalk at Sacramento and Pine needs to be replaced because the original repairs have not held up. Other low areas are not creatin a hazard and you may want to leave them until near the end of the rive -year warranty period, at which time these areas as well as any other low areas that develop could a 11 be done a t the same time. W would appreciate your proceeding with paving corrections as rapidly as possible, as discussed in our attached letter of September 13, 1985. Sincerely, G: Robison Assistant City Engineer i% c closures c c : Harold Raverty Glen Baltzer Muller Supply Co. GER/ma M4 f -F. STtze-eT" E- a yiAa.puT I A t4 W L 6=VMr • R o P�flu�