HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - March 7, 2012 C-12AGENDA ITEM C go 1 OL
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Approve Waiver of Conflict of Interest for Meyers Nave's Representation of
Northern California Power Agency (NCPA)
MEETING DATE: March 7, 2012
PREPARED BY: City Attorney's Office
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve waiver of conflict of interest for Meyers Nave in their
representation of the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The law firm of Meyers Nave represents the City from time to time
with regard to development agreements and other land use matters.
They also assisted the City in drafting sections of the development
agreements relating to electric utility costs. Meyers Nave also serves as General Counsel to NCPA, and
has been tasked with drafting a Member Services Agreement between NCPA and the City of Lodi for the
energy efficiency database services. Although technically a conflict of interest, I believe it is reasonable
to waive in light of the risks involved and our desire to use Meyers Nave for land use work in the future.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
FUNDING AVAILABLE: None Required.
4�hwabauer
ey
APPROVED: S—z 1 � , _
KonradtBartlam, City Manager
February 7,2012
D. Stephen Schwabauer
City Attorney of Lodi
Office of the City Attorney
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
575 Market Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, California 94105
tel 415.421.3711
fax 415.421.3767
www.meyersnave.com
Steven T. Mattas
Attorney at Law
smattas@meyersnave.com
FEB 13 2012
CTYATTOFINEY'S OFFICE
Re: Consentto ContinuedRepresentation ofthe City ofLodi and Northern
CaliforniaPowerAgencyRegarding crmOrbit—EnergyEffrciencyPSA and
CSA (LSR 12.06)
Dear Steve:
As you are aware, we act as the General Counsel to the Northern California Power Agency
("NCPA'). In that capacity we have been asked by NCPA to provide advice to it regarding
energy efficiency database services to be supplied to several of its members. NCPA has
been requested by the City of Lodi ("the City") and other NCPA members to enter into an
agreement with them ("the Member Services Agreement") by which NCPA would agree to
contract with crmOrbit, LLC. crmOrbit would provide energy efficiency database services
to the City and other NCPA members under the terms of a consultant services agreement
with NCPA, and the City and other NCPA members would agree to pay for the costs of
those services under the terms of the Member Services Agreement.
As an aside, we note that the format of the Member Services Agreement to be drafted would
be used as something of a template for the future "non-core services" to be provided under
the terms of a Legislative & Regulatory Program Agreement which is also being drafted.
In advising NCPA regarding drafting of both the crmOrbit consultant services agreement
and the Member Services Agreement with the City, there may be matters which create either
actual or potential conflicts of interest between the interests of NCPA and those of the City.
The interests and objectives of NCPA and the City relating to this matter either are or may
become inconsistent with each other.
We currently represent the City in connection with other matters which are unrelated to the
above matter. The purpose of this letter is to disclose this relationship and situation to you,
and to seek the City's informed, written consent to our continued representation of NCPA
with respect to this matter as well as our continued representation of the City in the land use
and CEQA matters for which we have been retained.
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA ROSA FRESNO
D. Stephen Schwabauer, City Attorney of Lodi
February7,2012
Page 2
As attorneys, we are governed by specific rules relating to our representation of clients when
present or potential conflicts of interest exist. Rules 3-310(B), 3-310(C), and 3-310(E) of the
CaliforniaRules of Professional Conduct provide as follows:
Rule 3-310(B): A member shall not acceptor continue representation of a client
without providing written disclosure to the client where:
(1) The member has a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal
relationship with a parry or witness in the same matter; or
(2) The member knows or reasonably should know that:
(a) the member previously had a legal, business, financial, professional, or
personal relationship with a parry or witness in the same matter; and
(b) the previous relationship would substantially affect the member's
representation; or
(3) The member has or had a legal, business, financial, professional, or personal
relationship with another person or entity the member knows or reasonably
should know would be affected substantiallyby resolution of the matter; or
(4) The member has or had a legal, business, financial, or professional interest in
the subject matter of the representation.
Rule 3-310(C): A member shall not, without the informed written consent of each
client:
(1) Accept representation of more than one client in a matter in which the
interests of the clients potentially conflict; or
Accept or continue representation of more than one client in a matter in
which the interests of the clients actually conflict; or
(3) Represent a client in a matter and at the same time in a separate matter accept
as a client a person or entity whose interest in the first matter is adverse to the
client in the first matter.
Rule 3-310(E): A member shall not, without the informed written consent of the
client or former client, accept employment adverse to the client or former client
where, by reason of the representation of the client or former client, the member has
obtained confidential information material to the employment.
With regard to Rule 3-310(B), neither we nor, to the best of our actual knowledge, any
member of our firm has or has had (i) any legal, business, financial, professional, or personal
relationship with any parry, witness, person, or entity or (ii) any interest in the subject matter
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA ROSA FRESNO
D. Stephen Schwabauer, City Attorney of Lodi
February 7,2012
Page 3
of our representation of NCPA disclosure of which is required by Rule 3-310(B), except for
our past and current representation of the City, as described above.
With regard to Rule 3-310(C), our presently proposed representation of NCPA in
connection with the matter described above will not result in our representing NCPA and
the City in the same matter. However, it will result in our representing NCPA in the matter
first described above at the same time as we are representing the City in separate matters.
Therefore, and since we have a professional duty of undivided loyalty to each current client,
given our current and past representation of the City, we need the informed written consent
of both NCPA and the City before we can represent NCPA in the captioned matter.
With reference to Rule 3-310(E), we do not believe that we have obtained any confidential
information from the City that would be material to the current matter in which we have
been asked to represent NCPA. However, the City may believe we have or may receive such
material confidential information due to the nature of our past and current representation of
the City. Consequently, before representing NCPA in this current matter, we request the
informed written consent of the City.
In connection with our proposed representation of NCPA in the matter described above
and for purposes of assisting you in determiningwhether or not to consent to such
representation, we hereby inform you that:
(a) We do not anticipate any foreseeable adverse effects upon the City by reason
of our representation of NCPA.
(b) We do not anticipate any foreseeable adverse effects upon the City by reason
of our past and current representation of the City.
We request that the City consider this written request carefully. You may wish to confer
with independent legal counsel regarding this consent, and should feel free to do so. If, after
review and consideration of the foregoing, the City consents to our representation of NCPA
in the captioned matter, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to me as
soon as possible.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or concerns about the foregoing.
Very truly yours,
J
NSe
e n ..iafflts
Cc: Conflicts Dept.
City of Lodi consents to the representation described above.
A PROFESSIONALLAW CORPORATION OAKLAND LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA ROSA FRESNO
D. Stephen Schwabauer, City Attorney of Lodi
.February7,2012
Page 4
Dated:
1791523.1
,2011 City of Lodi
By:
Its:
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION OAKLAND LOSANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO SANTA ROSA FRESNO