Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 17, 1988 (73)C O U N C I L C 0 M M U R I C A T. i N TO: THE CITY OJ-ZgJL COUNCIL MEETING DATE: FROM: THE CITY MANS OFFICE FEBRUARY 17, 1388 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 88-01 CITY OF LODI BUILDINGS DENULRUN RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City of Lodi consider and approve the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the abr.;ve project, to specifically include recommended findings provided by the Initial Study, prior to project authorization. Also, that the City of Lodi consider preservation measures which may be taken at the City's discretion. BACKGROUND Il4iJRM4-TUN On December 16, 1987, the Lodi City Council agreed to delay demolition of the old city jail, pending development of a study to determine the historical significance of the building. To this end, the Community Development Department conducted an initial study in accordance with Se::tion 21,000 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code, with cooperation from the San Joaquin County Historical Nkwml and the Save the Jail Committee, headed by Lodians Anne Meyers and Maria Serna. The scope of the study includes all structures within the project: site, except the old fire hall, which are being considered for demolition and may be of some possible historical significance. l2� Rick Barnum Associate Pl anner RB:jj 77 .7 7777r777 77��!Y7�1 r'. r I rrWE rEE LARATIONI Notice i s herebygiven that the City of Lodi Planning Department has determined that the following proposal will have no Significant Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail- able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Hail Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance of this Declaration to the Planning Commission nny do so no later than the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal". Date January 27, 1900 Project Title: ND -88-01 CITY OF LODI BUIIDINC,s DEMOLITION Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: RICK BARNUM NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY Lt43! FA 1,U PROJECT: CITY OF LOD I Address : Associate Planner City: County: 221 14. PINE STREET LOD I SAN JOAQU N T Area Code: 209) Phone; 333-5711 PROTECT DESCIUMON OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATI0N The project consists of clearing portions of City property (Parks & Recreation Department) located at 125 N. Stockton Street and 122 N. Main Street (corner lot), Lodi , CA. Clearing shall include demolition of structures, removal and disposal of concrete, brick, steel, and other incidental and related work. -project Location City Project Location County Env ironmenr.aI Assessment INITIAL STUDY 1. PROJECT T I TLE City of 1<.od1 Guilder's Demolition 2. LOCATION 125 N. Stocktsn Street; 122 id- gain Street _T ndil CA 3. PROJECT OESCR1PT10,`4 consists of rlearinn n nortion of the property at the above locations, including demolition of Structures,, removal and disposal of concrete, brick, steel, and otner incidental and related work. 4. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (8) Proposed Public (Existing designation, no change proposed) 5- Site description and surrounding land use —Site--CMSiS.t.S—of t- u��rP4----- assnciatPrl xxrith ('itv Parks ani RPrraatinn fln__ 6. ni n.r.o ;•;tions to-includo-- a cornnrate yard and offices Surtouadiaq_land—!:s�---t.�rlerci-a ; -- 6. Zoning (A) Existing, (8) Proposed Public(Fxictina zonin,, no charge proposed) Will the Project Have a Significant Effect Through Any of the Following Imoacts? 7, a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil orsubsoil features ................................... b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.. C. Substantially deplete surface or groundwater resources............................................. d. Substantially interfere with groundwater flow orrecharge ........................................... e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion orsiltation .......................................... f. Substantial interference with the habitat of any species of fish, wildlife or plant .................... g, Violate ambient air quality standards or create substantia? air emissions or objectionable odors...... h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare level for adjoining areas ............................. i, Substantial reduction of existing cropland............ YPC Na— M } X 4— X X X X Expose individuals or property to geologic, public health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards.. .... X z Yes No Maybe k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic effect............................................... X 1. Result in the disruption or alteration of an archeological, historical or paleontological site.... M. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in any natural resources ................................ X n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of fuelor energy ....................................... X o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm drain, electrical lines or public roads .............. X p. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of public services such as schools or fire or police protection ........................................... X q. Substantially change transportation patterns related to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking availability or traffic safety ....................... X r. Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace- ment of population ................................... X S. Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or planned land uses...... ............................. X t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of the City of Lodi ......... X Adverse impacts of proiect and their magnitude: Refer to attached Historic and Architectural Assessments. Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by Initial Study:_ M mitigation measures 'are proposed. RECOMMENDATION X Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative Declaration 1"1 Buildine Group A. HISTORIC MD ARC;:iTECTURAL ASSESSMENT PRCJ:Ci Ti"L_E City of Lodi Building Demolitions (Phase I) PART A. IDcNTIFIC"iTIOf; 1. Co -.Ton Nar;re: Storage Building 2. Historic name (if known) Unknown 3. Street address 125 N. Stockton Street City Lodi 4. Assessor Parcel Number 0 Zip 95240 County San Joaquin 5. Present owrer (if known) City of Lodi Address 221 W. Pine Street City Lodi Zip 95240 Ownership is: Public X Private 6. Present Use: Storage Original Use Unknown Other past uses Unknown PART B. DESCRIPTION 7. Describe the present physical apoearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: The subject building was constructed in two parts, one in 1908 and the other 1921. Construction is of unreinforced concrete block.. Although painted white, the concrete block displays its original "split face" ' appearance and wreath patterns. Building sides consist of a low parapet wall with a "dart and eggshell" cornice. The portion of the building dated 1908 has a sealed entrance and windows. Over each square window is an ornamental arch with cast concrete filigree. The adjacent corrnnon wall addition (1921) consists only of a 'large garage door opening. The building exists in a state of deterioration, with massive, continuous sidewall fractures at various locations. The building roof leaks pro- fusely, causing interior moisture conditions and wood rot. 8. Locational nap and photocraph;s?, including dazes of enclosed photograph(s). (Refer to Exhibits C & D Attached) 9. Approximate property size: Lot size (in feet) Frontage Depth 172' X 323' (corner lot) or Approximate acreage 1.3 Acres 10. Condition (Check One) Excellent Good Fair Deteriorated X 11. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) a. Open Space X ark) d. Residential b. Scattered buildings e. Commercial c. Densely built-up f. Industrial g. Other (describe M 12. Threats to site: a. None known d. Residential b. Private development e. Commercial c. Zoning — f. Industrial g. Other X (Describe) City Facility Expansion - Demolition 13. ` Primary exterior building material : a. Stone c. stucco e. Wood b. Brick d. Adobe Block f. Other --, (Describe) Concrete --Block 4 f ^ i� �.. n Yy75w"? r+ra F.�hae: �� �4t i A�.Si „t�rs, .� t'.iuS �F ., ..4 ;- , �'. r'! ,"'�'v°..Y� ��>� '� `� '`� `yL £:'� �'t � �•d i u.%�`.: ,u ' t .�+'�' u..�.."" R1;i;,", e �:�5 ��icaw",:.;..�.`,.`:;u J< 14. is the primary exterior building material original? Yes X No 15. is the structure a. On its original site? X b. Mooed? Unknown? 16. Year of initial construction 1908 & 1921 This date is: a. Factual X b. Estimated 17. Arch tect (if known): Unknown 18. Buil er (if known) Unknown 19. Architectural style: None (simplistic block building) PART C SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates, significant historical events, lives of persons significant in our past, distinctive architectural characteristics, potential to yield historical information, etc. ) (Refer to Part C Attached) BUILDING GROUP A NISTGRIC AN`U .".RCETTECTURAL ASSESSMENT PRCJCCT TITLE City of Lodi Building Demolitions (Phase I) PART A. IDENTIrIC:TION 1. Corson Nave: Storage Buildings (2) 2. Historic name (if known) Unknown 3. Street address Interior Alley - between Main & Stockton streets City Lodi Zip 95240 County San Joaquin 4. Assessor Parcel Number -0- 5. Present owner (if known) City of Lodi Address 221 W. Pine S t . City Lodi Zip 95240 Ownership i s : Public X Private 6. Present Use: Storage Original Use Unknown Other past uses Unknown PART B. DESCRIPTION 7. Describe the present physical a earance of the site or structure and describe any mayor alterations from its original condition: The subject buildings are constructed with unreinforced concrete block, and are of their natural concrete color. The concrete block displays its original "split face" appearance, and wreath patterns. The wreath pattern block is located only at the building corners. The building has numerous srral l doors or openings, which are sealed. The peaked roof is totally deteriorated with dry rot and shingles are missing, exposing the rafters underneath. Sidewalls of the building have continuous sidewall fractures, and evidence of post repairs. 8. Location -m r„ap and photecraph;s), incIudinc dates of enclosed phctocraph(s). (Refer to Exhibits C & D attached) 9. Approximate property size: Lot size (in feet) Frontace Depth or Approximate acreace 10. Condition (Check One) Excel 1 ent Good 172' x 323' (corner lot) 1-3 Fair Deteriorated X 11. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) a. Open Space Xan r d. Residential b. Scattered buildings e. Commercial X c. Densely built-up f. Industrial g. Other (describe) 12. Threats to site: a. None known d. Residential b. Private development e. Co � � erc i a 1 c. Zoning f. Industrial g. Other X (Describe) CltY facility expansion - demolition. 13. Primary exterior building material : a. Stone c. stucco e. Wood b. Brick d. Adobe Block f . Other (Describe) Concrete block 14 . Is the prinary exiericr buildinc raterial original? Y2s X ""'o 15. 1s the structure a. On its criGinal site? X b. ',"oved? Unknown? 16 Year of initial construction 1908 This date is: a. Factual X b. Estimated 17. Architect (if known): Unknown 18. Builder (if known): 19. Architectural style: PART C SIGNIFICANCE Unknown None (simplistic block building) 20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates, significant historical events, lives of persons significant in our past, distinctive architectural characteristics, potential to yield historical information, etc.) (Refer to Part C attached) RIM nTN, R N:STGRiC r% r.RC�i'cCTURAL ASSESSMENT PART A. Mr-NTIFiCAT CN 1. Corrron Nave: Old 7a i 1 2. Historic name (if known) I-Iiak=-in 3. Street address 122 N. Main Street Cit 4. Assessor Parcel Number -0- ip County San Ooaquin 5. Present owner (if: known) City of Lodi AddressPine Street —City Lodi Zip 95240 Ownership i s : Public x IPrivate 6. Present Use- tj=aqe Original Use uni c_i paI -jail— Other Jail— Other past uses ---None PART B. DESCRIPTION 7. Describe the present physical appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: E. Locational map and phot_ccraph s), including_ da_es of enclosed photograph(s). (Refer to Exhibits C and D attached). 9. Approximate property size: Lot size (in feet) Frontage Depth or Approximate acreage 172' x 323' 1.3 acres 10. Condition (Check One) Excellent Good Fair Deteriorated X 11. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) a. Open Space X d. Residential _ b. Scattered buildings e. Commercial X c. Densely built-up f. Industrial g. Other (describe) 12. Threats to site: a. None known d. Residential b. Private development e. Commercial c. Zoning f. Industrial g. Other X (Describe) City facility expansion - demolition :a. Is the prir..ary exterior building material original? Yes X No 15. Is the structure a. On its original site? X b. Roved? Unknown? 16. Year of initial construction 1908 This date i s : a. Factual X b. Estimated 17. Architect (if kncwn): 18. Builder ( if known): Unknown 11 Iq1.• . 19. Architectural style: None (simplistic block building) PART C SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates, significant historical events, lives of persons significant in our past, distinctive architectural characteristics, potential to yield historical information, etc.) (Refer to Part C Attached) _3. 4 -'' W7 MR PART C. S I GINI F I CANCE T)kcnccinn For purposes of this study, the lead agency has elected to utilize standards established by the National Register of Historic P',aces to evaluate and determine the historic significance of the buildings in question. The National Register of Historic Places is designed to be used by the general public, local communities, state governments and federal agencies in their preservation planning efforts. (Refer to Exhibit A: Eligibility Criteria). By utilizing the National Register Criteria, the historic significance of the buildings in question and their eligibility for the National Register can be determined in the following manner: Determination of Historical Significance National Register Criteria. Standards for inclusion consists of meeting all of the following: 1. Category of Historic Property The property in question consists of several buildings. 2. Historicdl Context (Theme) ,— The subject buildings can be found to be representative of the following historical themes: A. Type of building construction (Perrin Bros. Company); B. Information/topic (Early City of Lodi municipal operations; early 1900's law enforcement and social attitudes). 3. Type of Significance 1 9OW-OW;0lO:I The Perrin Bros Company of Lodi manufactured concrete building materials in Loi from 1908 to 1915, and most particularly cast concrete block. Perrin Bros. was also known to construct curbs and sidewalks in Lodi, as well as the cast concrete globe light standards which still dominate many neighborhoods in Lodi . Perrin block can be noted as a type of building material which has characteristics that are distinctive, and therefore capable of being placed into a separate category unto itself. EXHIBIT A NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA The standards for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places consists of meeting all. of the following eligibility criteria: 1. Category of Historic Property A historic property must be a district, site, building, structure or object. 2. Historical Context (theme) A historic property must possess significance in American history, architecture, archaeologv, engineering, or culture. The property must be representative of significam, themes, or patterns in the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture of the relevant geographical area (Lodi), and must possess characteristics that make it a gocd representative of those themes. NOTE: A theme may be defied by an event or series of events; a developmental force; an association with the life of a significant person; by one building type, period, or method of construction; or by information on a particular tcpic. 3. Type of Significance A historic property mcst meet one or more of the following spec fic criteria, and be established within the context of a historical theme. A. The property may be associated with an event(s) that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history. (community, state, or national level). B. The property may be associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. C. The property may embody the di sti nc+ive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that which possesses high artistic values. Overall, the buildings in question display no particular identifiable architectural style. However, in the historical context, the old jail and storage buildings possess Characteristics which are notably "Perrin Company", such as conspicuous date blocks, cornices, cement filigree, and "split face" textures. B. HISTORIC INFORMATION The _chief value of the buildings is their association with the history of Lodi's city government, in that they have been utilized as a part of the city's early municipal operations. Most particularly, the jail building may lend information about social attitudes in law enforcement at the turn of the century. 4. Intim In the context of historical property, integrity is the authenticity of the property's historic identity, as evidenced by the survival of physical characteristics that existed during the buildings historic period. For the purpose of establishing historic integrity, it is important to note that the buildings in question have suffered significant physical deterioration over the years, and have been officially determined by the City Building Official to be structurally unsound and not suitable for any purpose. (Refer to Exhibit B). In addition to its advanced physical deterioration, the jail has been altered for other uses, causing the removal of cell fixtures and interior door hardware. Only the presence of barred windows and a "barred" wooden door suggests that the building was at one tine used as a jail. The other remaining buildings under discussion have also had their interiors removed or altered for storage, and exterior windows and doors have been sealed. (Refer to Exhibit C). The loss of important physical components resulting from deterioration and localized demolition significantly diminished theuq ality of the resource, and thus the overall historical integrity of the buildings in question. FINDINGS .1. As a result of physical deterioration and localized demolition, the buildings' sigi..ficance as a historic resource has diminished to an insignificant level. 2. The buildings' loss of historical integrity would cause them to be ineligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historical Places, therefore, it has been determined that the proposed project will not result in a significant impact on the environment (historical resources), and that no mitigative action is required. 1. That a qual ificd professional historian develop a historical interpretive and photo documentation of the buildings. 2. That architectural elements of the structures (e.g. dates, arches, filigree, cornices and cement blocks) be incorporated into the new construction onsite, using the following example: Architectural elements may be incorporated into an interior wall of a building foyer which iji l l be open to the public. Interpretives ,mould also be incorporated into an interior design which would focus on a historic motif of the City. Attachments settlement, migration, ideals, beliefs, I; fe,.•jays , and other facets of the development or maintenance of cultural systems. 4. Integrity A historic property must possess integrity. Integrity is the authenticity of a prcperty's historic identity, evidenced by the survival of physical characteristics that existed during the property's historic period. Integrity applies to the historic resource in seven ways: A. Location: The historic resource is at the place it was originally constructed. B. Design: The design of buildings reflects its historical function and available technologies of the period. C. Setting: Setting is the physical environment of the building. As opposed to location, setting illustrates the character of the place in %-ah i ch the resuurce played its historical role. The physical features of a historic setting may be the spatial relationships of other buildings around the property. D. Materials: Materials are the physical elements that were combined to form the site, building, or structure in a particular period in the past. The choice of materials can provide inforniation about preferences of those who created the prcperty, and about the availability of particular types of materials and technologies. The integrity of such materials determines whether or not an authentic historic resource still exists. E. Workmanship: Workmanship is the physical evidence of crafts of a particular culture or people during a period of history, which reveals individual , local , regional, or national applications of technological practices and aesthetic principles. (Tooling, joinery, painting, etc.) F. Feeling: Feeling is the quality a historic resource has in evoking the historic sense of a past period of time. Although intangible, feeling depends upon the presence of physical characteristics to convey the historic quality. It may require the presence and integrity of the historical setting. G. Association : Association is the direct link between a property and an event or person. I f a property has "integrity of association", then the property is the place where the event or activity occurred and it adequately conveys that relationship. EXHIBIT B MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi , Community Development Department TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: Roger G. Houston, Chief Building Inspector DATE: January 15, 1988 SUBJECT: General Findings --Old Jail Building Storage Buildings 114 North Main Street General inspection of the Old Jail building revealed its construction to be as follows: 1. Building floor is concrete. 2. Building walls are unreinforced, hollow, concrete masonry blocks. 3. The roof has a truss system. There are several major cracks in the masonry walls. Some of these cracks are large enough that one is able to see through the walls. The integrity and strength of the roof truss system has been destroyed largely due to the fact that the bottom cords were cut and removed to make room for storage. In general, the jail i s structurally unsound and deteriorated to such an extent that it should not be used for any purpose. The masonry storage buildings are i n as bad or worse condition than the jail. RGH:dsg cc: James B. Schroeder Rick Barnum OFFICE r—==7 L.__ j -J — — — — - I BLDG, ^I "8�• ST06GE I PHASE ---� • •'.I I i I I I � I I PHASE OLDFIRE HOUSE i ALLEY PHASE I DEMOLITION BUILDINGS GROUP A BUILDING B r� WELL FACILITY C 0 0 7-1 EXHIBIT EAST ELEVATION 125 N. Main St. F;EST ELEVATION Excessive moisture c. 1921 addition is to the right. conditions are evident. ` '`•• O �.! _�' Y ' (` tit IS �'���.*�.�.^��.. �•:.'�f._ Wil!' :' _'TCGj. EAST ELEVATION Cornice, date, and TEST ELEVATION Roof rot is evident window arch detail to the left of parapet wall. RPRoDuc iON OF THIS WEST ELEVATION Old Jail Facility Perrin Block pattern is visible SOUTH ELEVATION Ual l openings left from cell fixture remova NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS Wooden door and vent tubes are visible. _ SOUTH ELEVATION Detail of wall opening; block is uiireinforced. 71 �'_. �-.�.: •1 .V -Z .may. ` .k� r•' '�1•+jJ� _ SOUTH ELEVATION Detail of wall opening; block is uiireinforced. SOUTH ELEVATION trial 7 failure is evident. -Crack width is +1" SULM ELEVATION Block failure and EY STORAGE "'r o f patch work. Wreaths are visible. __. �nor� rounecP vehicle TO REVIEW AND APPROVE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE CITY BUILDINGS DEMCMIGN PRQIECT (Ot D CITY JAIL AND STORAGE BUILDINGS) NOTICE IS HEREBY GI VDD that on Wednesday, February 17, 1988 at the hour of 7:30 pm., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a public hearing to review and approve a negative declaration for the city buildings demolition project (old city jail and storage buildings). Copies of the subject negative declaration are available in the City Clerk's office, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, and may be obtained during regular business hours. Additional information regarding this item may be obtained from Nt Richard Barnum, Associate Planner, Community Development Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California (telephone - 333-6711). All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, at or prior to, the Public Hearing. Ey Order Of the Lodi City Council : CiECCC !%1 lu�vYf�l�v Alice M. Reimche City Clerk Dated: February 4, 1988 Approved as to form: Ronald M. Stein City Attorney 402 ',lest Oal,- Street #'u Lodi, California 95240 February 17, 1938 City Council hodi , California Members of the Council: Under discussion is the preservation of Lodi's second jail, located in the Lodi Recreation Department's grounds. It does not appear to be feasible to save it in its entirety as it would likely fall apart and it is not in its original and %iorkable condition as a jail. Therefore, the proposed incorporation of signifi- cant samples of the architecture of the jail into the design of the new recreation building is a good proposal. This will be a means of instruction to all visitors to the facility, The youth of Lodi will learn something of the history of our city, The recreation department will gain a new facility. We all gain in the process, The heritage of Lodi's early architecture and history is in danger of being squandered. I hope that the process of researching the jail and the interest that. has been awakening to save it. will result in an org s. z an za.#d devote. 6--: I thank you for delaying your decision on clearing the recreation site until this evenir. g.; Your concern for history is greatly appreciated.