HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - November 7, 1990 (47)COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Attachment
APPRu'v'=-
PETERSON. City ManagE
r
FILE NO.
CVICTOR/TXTW.02M (CO.COM) October 30, 1990
MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi , Public Works Department
T0: City Council
City Manages
FROM: Public Works Director
DATE: October 29, 1990
SUBJECT: Trees on Victor Road
At its October 17 meeting, the City Council directed staff to look into
the possibility of saving trees on the south side of Victor Road (State
Highway 12) and in particular, the trees at the Teresi development at
Victor `Road and Guild Avenue. This direction was prompted by citizen
concerns over the trees that had been removed on the Teresi property and
numerous trees that exist further east.
Back round Information
trees in question are located on the south side of Victor Road within
the State Highway Right -of -Way between Cluff Avenue and Locust Tree Road.
There are approximately 100 trees east of the Central California Traction
(CCT) tracks. Based on old aerial photos, there were 29 trees located
between the CCT tracks and Hrghway 99 after FEghway 99 was constructed.
MA of these trees have been removed with the fol owing projects:
° 7 trees - Misc. developments between Highway 99 and Cluff Avenm
° 8 trees - Lodi Door and misc. developments east of Cluff Avew
5 trees - Dart Container east of Guild Avenue
4 trees - Teresi , west of Guild Avenm to Lodi Door
G 1 tree - Guild Avenue intersection
Thus four trees remain fronting the undeveloped parcel between Dart
Container and the CCT tracks.
Development of the land included installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk,
and u t i l i t i es as required by City ordinances. Based on the location of
the trees and the required alignment and width of Victor Road by the State
of California, there has been little choice but to remove the trees.
W do not recall ariy opposition to the earlier tree removals.
The Teresi project 1 s the second phase of a subdivision which included the
Dart Container project east of Guild Avenue. The Dart improvement
pro * ect was approved and constructed in 1985, including plans for the
Victor Road iinprovements showing removal of the trees. Construction of
Guild Avenue was deferred pending development of the property west of
MCC9001/TXTW,01L
City Council
October 29, 1990
Page 2
Guild Avenue. In 1990, the owners initiated the necessary updating of the
plans in preparation for development and Dart Container was requested to
work with the owners on the joint installation of Guild Avenue. As the
plans neared completion, the land was cleared and the owners contracted
with Claude C. Woodto do the public improvement work on Victor
Road. A subcontractor for -Claude C, Wood started to remove the trees on
Victor Road without obtaining the necessary State permits and was stopped
by Caltrans after three trees were cut down. Of the two trees left, one
was located within the Guild Avenue intersection and must be removed
During the time between this tree removal and the Council meeting of
October 17, City staff was contacted by three persons regarding the
trees. The first call was from a County Public Works engineer who asked
about our policies and approval procedures regarding tree removal; It
noted that their policy was that all tree remyals within the right-of-way
be specifically approved by the Board of Supervisors. The second call
came later firm a citizen who asked about what could be done to save the
trees. Based on the City's past approvals and the fact that the trees
were in the State right-of-way, the caller was directed to the City
Council and/or the State. Another call rune from a Council member asking
about the situation. (After the Council meeting, another cel 1 was
received, The caller supported efforts to save the trees but did not wish
t o leave a name).
At the October 17 Council meeting, staff indicated that ve would check
with Caltrans to see if the permit could be delayed. Unbeknownst to us
the permit had already been issued. As ve later learne , the matter had
been reviewed and approved by a number of persons at Caltrans, all the way
up to the District Director. Their review by traffic engineers its well as
a landscape architect, all concluded that it was appropriate to remove the
remaining tree,
On Thursday, after the City Council meetin on October 17, staff contacted
all the parties involved in the project. first checked with Caltrans
and found out that the permit was issued and since it had been approved
the Director, the Permit Department would not put a hold on the work
were directed to the Traffic Department and the Director's Office. Both
the Director and head of Traffic were on vacation. W then contacted
Claude C. Wood CorrTanyand the tree subcontractor and left messages that
the trees should not becut. W spoke with the project engineer win was
very concerned about construction delays, especially given the time of
year. we also spoke with John Teresi win agreed to delay the work until
Monday, October 22, while staff worked with Caltrans.
City traffic and survey staff made additional field measurements to
determine what modifications to the plans would have to be made in order
to save the one remaining tree not within the Guild Avenue intersection.
The tree is located 31 feet from the centerline. The face of curb is to
be 32 feet from the centerline. Thus saving the tree would mean one of
the following:
MCC9001/TXTW,01L
City Council
October 29, 1990
Page 3
1) Move the curb and gutter toward the centerline, creating a space
behind the curb for the tree. This space would need to be at least 6
feet.
2) NW the curb and gutter behind the tree and place a guardrail in
front of the tree.
3) Leave out the curb and gutter and place guardrail in front of the tree.
These options were discussed with the head of the Caltrans Traffic Branch
and the acting director on Friday, October 19. They did not approve any
of these options, mainly because all would place an object in the pavement
that would protrude from the curb alignment already established on both
sides of the project. They also noted that the 32 foot •1/2 width was
already 6 feet narrower that their current standards for this type of
highway. Option 1 would further reduce the width to 26 feet and Options 2
and 3 would be approximately 28 feet.
On Monday, October 22, vie informed Claude C. Wood Company that ve could
not legally stop them from removing the trees. Howver, ethe improvement
plans had not yet been signed. On Tuesday, we received the attached
letter iam Caltrans. Bj late Wednesday, October 24, the owners had
provided the insurance, fees and Caltrans permits required by the City.
Therefore, we issued a City permit for the work To further delay the
work, after all our requirement have been met would not only be unfair to
the property Owixts, it would have left the City open to a lawsuit. The
two remaining trees were cut on Friday, October 26.
The Future
In all our discussions with the State, County, citizens and developpers, it
was clear that the fate of the remaining trees to the east should be
considered now, rather than piecemeal or in the middle of a development
project.
As discussed previously with the City Council, one of the first projects
that will be undertaken after adoption of the General Plan, will be a
study of Highway 12/Kettleman Lane. Originally the study was to focus cn
the interchange at Highway 99. Later it became obvious that the study
needed to include lane geometrics, access control, medians and other items
on Kettleman Lane both east and west of Highway 99. This study would be
the appropriate place to look at Victor Road since it is the extension of
Highway 12 to the east.
There will not be a simple answer to saving the rest of the trees if
Victor Road is ever to be widened to accommodate additional traffic. The
north side is bounded by rhe Southern Pacific Railroad which severely
limits widening cn that side. Other options such as moving the State
Highway to an alternate street east of Highway 99 (Kettleman Lane or
others will have to be considered. In addition, i t should be remembered
that any wok around oak trees often proves tc be fatal to the tree. The
City has had only mixed success in saving trees adjacent to new or widened
streets.
MCC9001/TXTW.01L
City Council
October 29, 1990
Page 4
The draft General Plan includes a recommendation that a heritage tree
urduaance be_develo ed. This could affect trees on bo iva op rtY
.as well as public right-of-way. Aside from the Victo,A0?S projeFf t%e
Council may wish to -start on such an ordinance. We. suggest that a
.11 committee includingprivate citizens,` the development community, ,City:
.
staff:-and.,possibly.aqualified"tree consultant..be�establi'st%ed toy -draft a
workable ordinance and implementation guidelines'. The Public Works
Department would b glad, to participate An, such an effort.""
14
ack .-Ronsko
Public Works Director
JLR/RCP/lw
Attachment
cc: Assistant City Engineer
Community Development Director
Barbara Graham
((syy Andrews
Sally Humphreys', AAUW
MCC9001/TXTW.01L
OCT -73 *,?o 16:00 D10 -CT -133-3031
STATE OF CAUfORWA— USIMSS, TUNSKXTATION AND NOUSiNG ACANGY GEORGE DIUKMEJIAN, OOrNna
DEPARTMENT OF -TRANSPORTATION
P.O. SOX =a (1976 E. CHARTER WAY)
S?OCKTON, CA 93301
TDD (3097 946 -ng
"9)946-7M
October 23, 2990
10 -SJ -12
Victor Road
city of Lodi
City hall
Call Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241.1910
Attention Jack L. Ronsko
Director of Public Works
Dear Jack
I have reviewed your request to save one of the two remaining
tress to be removed under encroachment permit issued to John
Teresi for work on Victor Road east of Route 99. Because of
similar development east and west of these two txees and the fact
that one of the trees is in the intersection of the proposed new
street and the other close enough that it may affect sight
distance, it may not be possible to save either one. V% would
certainly be willing co review any ideas you have to Save the one
tree.
However, if because of time constraints this is not possible, we
would certainly be interested in discussing means to avoid future
removal of the row of trees to the east of the developed area.
John Gagliano, the District's Permit Engineer and Bryan Walker,
Associate Landscape Architect would be available to assist you in
this. John may be reached at 948-3819 and Bryan may be reached at
948-3655.
Si rely,
J S B . BOP.DEN
strict Director
cc: John Gagliano