Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - November 4, 1992 (63)CITY OF LODI AGENDA TITLE: Revised 1992-93 Operating Budget MEETING DATE: November 4, 1992 PREPARED BY: City Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council complete its review of the amended 1992-93 Operating Budget and take action as deemed appropriate. Approval of the budget will be via the adoption of Resolution No. 92-185 which will accompany the revised budget document. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its regular meeting of July 1, 1992, the City Council approved the Operating Budget for 1992-93. The Council was advised that this would serve as an interim budget until the State's budget was adopted and the extent cf the revenue reductions to cities was known. At that time the Council would be requested to adopt a revised, final budget. We now know that the State's revenue reduction to the City of Lodi will be approximately $430,000. Budget reductions are now being reviewed with department heads and the recommended revised budget will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Wednesday night's meeting. FUNDING: No additional funding required Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Peterson City Manager TAP hr APPROVED THOMAS A PETERSON recycled 0809, RESOLUTION NO. 92-184 --------------------- --------------------- A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL ADOPTTNG AN OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE SUPPORT OF VARIOUS DPEPA4T`i -xrrS C'r' THE CITY OF LODI AND A UTILITY OUTLAY BUDGET, BUT EXCLUDING THEREFROM THE LODI PUBLIC LIBRARY, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1992 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1993. WHEREAS,. it is necessary that the Lodi City Council adopt an operating budget reflecting appropriate adjustments for loss of certain State revenues; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to separate therefrom funding for the Lodi Public Library, which will be addressed by separate Resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein, an operating budget for the support of various departments of the City of Lodi and a Utility Outlay Budget, but excluding therefrom the Lodi Public Library, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Dated: November 4, 1992 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 92-184 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held November 4, 1992 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Pennino, Sieglock, Snider, and Pinkerton (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Hinchma.n Absent: Council Members . None UC�U/ Alice M. 1 imche City Clerk 92- 184 M E M O R A N D U M TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: City Manager DATE: November 2, 1992 SUBJ: 1992-93 Operating Budget Presented herein for your information and review are the recommended reductions leading to the ultimate adoption of the 1992-93 Operating Budget. These reductions total $644,410, approximately 50t in excess of the amount of the State's reduction in revenue to the City of approximately $430,000. Included in the recommendations is the elimination of seven permanent full-time positions, each of which will be enumerated later. Also included is the elimination of a considerable number of part-time hours equating to approximately $49,445. Other significant areas of reductions are: elimination of salary adjustments for mid -management personnel ($78,045); suspension of administrative leave pay back ($81,125); reduced fringe benefit costs ($75,480); and business, conferences and training ($77,320). These five categories alone total $361,415. In addition, General Fund expenditures have been further reduced by allocating $36,250 of Transportation Development Act monies to fund staff time devoted to transit administration. The following is a summary discussion of the more significant recommendations by department and division, CITY CLERK [S5.0201- The reductions are in the categories of part-time hours, administrative leave, and business, conferences and training. CITY COUNCIL [$5.6151_ - This reduction is achieved via a 10t cut in City Councilmembers' compensation and a reduced amount for business, conferences and training, and the interim budget adopted in June already reflects this. C=4II MITY INFORMATION [$16,0001 This is the result of the elimination of the City newsletter in the format introduced earlier this calendar year. CITY ATTORNEY [$2,6801 - iministrat ive leave and business, conferences and training. 4 CITY MANAGER [$7,0551 - Administrative leave and business, conferences and training. PERSONNEL [$4.7101 - This reduction is achieved by eliminating the mid -management salary adjustment of 41k, and elimination �)f administrative leave pay, and reduced expsnditures for business, conferences and training. COMMUNITY DEVELGMENr [$30,6751 - PLANNING ($15,005) - Combined here are reductions in -mid -management compensation, administrative leave and business, conferences �F.nd training. - BUILDING INSPECTION ($15,670) - These reductions here are in the same categories as Planning, with an additional gut in part-time hours. FINANCE [$87,9501 The major item in this department is the elimination of the position of Assistant Finance Director. Cther reductions are the result of the administrative leave compensation suspension and business, conferences and training. POLICE [$55.8601 - The most significant factor contributing to this recommended r^duction is the elimination of one Dispatcher position. Actually, the number of dispatchers assigned to the Dispatch Center will not be reduced. One dispatcher will be transferred from the Services Division to fill a current vacancy in the Dispatch Center and a Community Services Officer will be re -assigned to the Services Division. Other reducticns are in the categories of administrative leave and business. conferences and training. FIRE $56,760 while there are some partially offsetting >'creases in this budget in the areas of -onferences and training, as well salary savings - sulting from the six-month vacancy in one 3attalion C,iief position. previously negotiated salary adjustment effecr.ive October 1, 1992 result in chis budget being increased by ;56,'760. P. PUBLIC WORKS [$140,269 ' ADMINISTRATION ($15,2651 - ENGINEERING [$18,9951 BUILDING MAINTENANCE [$5,5351 STREET MAINTENANCE [$7, J1 The reductions here are in the categories Of mid -management compensation, administrative leave and business, conferences and training. - The areas of reductions are mid -management compensation, administrative leave, and business, conferences and training. The areas here are the same as listed in Engineering. ' The areas of reductions here are in mid -management compensation, administrative leave and business, conferences and training. - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE [$43,7551 Tire major contributing factor here is the elimination of one position, that of Equipment Service Worker. It is actually somewhat more involved than that. As a result of a reorganization of this division, one position will be eliminated and another reclar3sified to Mechanic. - WASTEWATER ADMINISTRATION [$6,2351 - The categories of reductions here are mid -management compensation, administrative leave, and business, conferences and training. - PLANT MAINTENANCE ($3s 201 The ma3or factor in this recommended (WHITE SLOUGH) reduction is the elimination of one Laborer position at the White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility. Additional areas of reductions are the same As 1n the other Public Works divisions. 3 A WATER ADMINISTRATION ($6,235) The categories of reductions here are mid -management compensation, administrative leave, and business, conferences and -raining. - RECREATION ADMINISTRATION ($76,655) - PARKS I-DtIINISTRATIO?' ($119,7451 ELECTRIC UTILITY f$50.4251 The major reduction here is the elimination of the Project Coordinator position. Another major category is a 33% reduction in part-time hours in clerical staffing. Other cateaories in which reductions are recommended are mid -management compensation, administrative leave and business, conferences and training. - The eliminaticn of two positions represents the major portion of the recommended reductions here. They are the positions of Park Naturalist and Laborer. There are also significant reductions in part-time hours in the budget categories of Parks Administration, Sports Facilities and Other Parks. Other categories are the same as in Recreation Administration. ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION ($36,2951 - - ELECTRIC ENGINEERING [$5,510) - The reductions here are in the areas of mid -management compensation, administrative leave and business and conferences. The reductions here 'a r'_ in the same categories as Electric Administration. (There are addi,.ional ,nor reductions in other budget categories in the Electric Utility Departm,: COYMMITY CENTER ($5,8451 (HUTCHINS STREET SQUARE) ARTS COMMISSION ($6,9801 - SENIOR COMISSION [52 215 - The reductions here are in the two categories of part-time clerical hours, and administrative leave and business expf!nses. All pa -t -time hours. here have been eliminated. The Hutchins Street Square staff will assume the responsibility of providing assistance to this commission. There is also a slight reduction ($2,250) in the amount available to be allocated by the commission to community arts groups. The reductions here are in the categories of mid -management compe-sation and administrative leave. A most significant decision faces the City Council with regard to the Library. Since the late 1970's, in the aftermath of the passage of proposition 13, funding for the Library has been 17.86% of the property tax revenue received by the City. This proportionate share was established by action of the City Council because at that time the City's property tax rate was $1.68 per $100 of assessed valuation. Of that figure, $.30 was allocated to fund the Library, Applying that ratio to the Library now results in a revenue reduction of $76,785, or approximately 7.6% of the total Library budget. Percentage -wise, other departments and divisions are not subjected to such a mayor reduction, although the cut in Parks and Recreation is almost 7tc. On the other hand the City's General Fund Reserve as a percentage of the City's General Fund budget in no way approximates the percentage of the Library Reserve Fund as applied to the Library's operating buckle:. In all probability the Library Board will wish to address the Council seeking to reduce this impact. It is recommended that in addition to the budget review appearing on the agenda for the regular meeting of Wednesday, November 4, 1992, the City Council devote the "Shirtsleeve" sessions of November 3 and November 20 (if necessary) to this topic. Based on previous discussions with the City Council, staff is well aware that the Council wishes to adopt this budget no later than the second meeting._ in,November.(November.,18). Staff will be pleased to arrange for whatever additional meetings the Council feels the need to schedule to meet its objective. Attached are the appropriate revised budget schedules. The Assistant City Manager and the Finance Director will be present at Tuesday morning's "Shirtsleeve" session to assist the City Council in this budget review. TAP _br Attachment Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Peterson City Manager 6 Iji • .t •r t r•1 r ' u C) c) 0 ?:J . - t• in C) to C11 v, T) !o C. crt n! Cn Irl rt U CI In Ci;, cq hJ to it ) Irl 111 C') C) 10 r) O tt. U't Irl U t) C) 10 C) in O 1r' C) Iii ii J 1n s t) L) 01 C'1 C) Cd C'J ,- t7 tc) UI C) r•J rJ Cj -I C7 •I N I11 ttl (;, U C', tJ t•1 t to (.) !O P•• 1 - f • C7 tai P. trl i!) fj1 l0 f kl (i, Of t.) CJ -> 1•• '.� '1 0, 0, f t r't M In CJ r r"l •! ,.h 111 •t 01 G') 1•- In c o 0t C) ^1 1! oI !',J I' I C-. t). 1'i, 1 . I '0 !f) C) Irl CJ r- f . pl (�I lL U ('1 U) Ir) I, . • U t1 I11 r'U t , 1 0) 7) C r, M f • ... 't C•J C) In 01 C)i c) (' I (S, (•7 t•. . n r i •J 1 i J ' ,' h I It , til ^t CJ CI y 1J IT. In 111 , to z _) r•J �� !! ,a LI Lit n < z rr. i•7 to w ' IL to V fu 't ` a J �� ' ; f ' ►u � ,n lt. ' > Q iC. 9 D u D lr f- C: lil 7 IC) D a AJ iD 1a Z p ` 4. 67 D y Il Iu f Q) ,- to w lil C) It tL �l r' W ►^ : m o� *T1 to 'y qj ,,—R s ro to IIIID LL lL U a C h IL 17 0 °n. ti w 't) �: 4 c (� IC tt ,_ U. C � q Q Z. i � ( .r t) )� i• `V la t.� In o� ro ro z- t/) i1 -7 UJ C s o In m C �� iD 'In ir . z U.to C.! li. IO w 47 .. 1 !J Q. 7 C (: • �� i I I , 'D m i1) a C_) ,p o 0 �! IX 47 1� o "��s 67 L U L� w 1�' U > S _ _ i t� Id W u- :; IK Q ID In tt) (_ U CJ Ll1 r Q 1! w •. s .o rr. t;) t) v O > u-1 (•, to E b j ,0 1•, t7 (- L 1. Z 111 ID /.: tD n. t— I.. ID () IV Ii f"t CI ;j .�= (L C_! �) j fJ) Ul W Z T .5 W I--- IJI (I. ) .�'' Ll Ill (1) Ill 1- ? U Lu 0 t) •:cn, S 17,10-:.:55 ^^?— ^_.a 924 nQ45 ,._._ .. ut.ttbt;tb:tGt'� u' ciii+ij�t7.r: �: „ ••" �;ias Tax 5 C4 Cther Tates 64 r , : Pines. ECrfeits and Feercwtes IV ^ayanua from Lyes of Ulcney a F•rccer �I.v :C5.g15 Revenue from Ct-,er Agenc:a5 3.1 Cu.7C5 Ct'srges for GjaTert S-_tv!Ge5 -107-1 7 ^U C'`J^ar Revenues ct3i - '00 7 Zn I — Asset Sai=Lre j � I — Refuse Surcharge 123,910 4cyising ano Lkoan Ceveiconjent 47.5.,D i r nsporation Cavelopmant Azt 357,243 State stets Ta:K 454,1025 Wastewater � v .Jatar Impact f=ees J 15.755 IP crsc fcr Gthars 73.215 ?ub!ic L ability irsu: arca F�;rd 13,5?5 krkers' ;,omoer•satior =unci 57.+,225 3+0 0— C y G 1 r4Eri =�i,' r : A:� Fri . c' �^�j Hatei/Metal Fund 5 T-055- 'ate ltlity Bund 75b,CCC :59wer Lhi!i'y P•jnd E!ac.ric U-Vity F:nd 3,1w C+'� w Otal TCTA E: IV.— ATS FfNAN-V ;NG cESC';RCES E;3T:,,4i cC RCCClFEit1'EhTa CFErti—RN3 EXPENGES Per-,cnnat Sannc�s S 17,10-:.:55 Utiliue5 r Tr4n5OG . bon 924 nQ45 ,._._ .. ut.ttbt;tb:tGt'� u' ciii+ij�t7.r: �: „ &_10—TCrx! iZt:)e-9' =cCen-rte~ N'"E^.—F SNC' 7c•ncq--mi `�..ncl Cl -arts ?o E. -oris Puri .i .� : -%S TZ C c:7n Co. rat rc :--. ;7 .' ...rE.: kat c a 2•�.512.0-5 IVV V. L. IJP+t ELECTRIC UTILITY FUND SUMMARY OF THE BUDGEET 1992-93 ESTIMATED FINANCING RESOURCES OPERATING RPIENUES Sate cEElectrics v S 34.,!3-5,_r-,_;0 Total :3 34.430.560 OTHER INCONME Sale cE System - Joint Pols 20.0G0 Sale of Property - Salvage 4.600 Pble Rental (CAT`) 13.390 interest Income 12.260 Electric Miscethneous 55,00-0 Revenue NGC 40 Capacitv Charge 6.0-00 Total .r i t 1.157C TOTAL ESTIMATED FINANCING RESOURCES ESTIMATED REQUIREMENTS OPERATING EXPENSES Personnel Set -vices :Z, ' 10,90".030 Utilities, & Transportation IM Materials & Supplies i0.3.390 Depreciation of Equipment' 11 Equipment. Lancs & �Struettres ' 48.025 Special Payments v13. 70 Sub -Total Operating Expense, Bulk Power Purchase �: dTER-Ft t(i)p TRA,N;FEP:� Genesi Fitnri CONTRIBUTIONS TO Lt �:R FUN1D'c_,* L,ND PES. R Genera', FLIfI=1 FL & PD ! t i::t.tt'OMC e. SCHEDLtE C 3.2g 1.550 :� Gr`.SVO.L'OO :3 28.7c1, 580 :5 34.%54S.1 ;u 1 Ird C] f)• [_ 1 �d) 111 '1 r. Ci t•'i IJJ ' dA r1) f.) U C7 to v cn C) �) Ir•1 ' c, r ri ui t ai eel a' .- o' .' i ►'1 r� ;.. pi lel Eli dpi Id dli hl � 1' (�) C) t7 C) t') C7 CH 0 n C9 r) C) 0 C-) 0 L) C') C) C) to C) to n C) to C�1 VJ to C> t] In P• �';? c) l c.7 0' p. c) l•) L LI h U CA C'') 1•• rX) C) C) C) L)r17 ^! 11) t • 1•• C') U) C7 r C7 90 UI U) rT 0.1 �r H C> fq O CON r i l • .l . 1- f,1 w C1 �.., f•t "7 lr) C,� t.. U. pl 1. •1 If t i ki d11 i. 1 .•1 - �. i -.) t11 EIL N7 1 U CTS U.1 IrIr tt. / ♦•J CD '``i .. t�] lli r1i If IT l ) �• �l cn 17 ii Op = ra t• I 1 I Ul t I' f .a rD 1 .. t_J �. C . 1.. I -• n ; I1J N N C=' �•% .� U t: I'+ f 1 �i 1 r•� IC %, ry LJI p 4') in 1 lu cn 1 c U1 �� IL A Q CJ r�,) S. t11 N N t: m p, u5 LIJ 7_ tt. '" , Ou l ., ill I IJ 11J r!) a, p O �� N C) i^ i t y 3 Z Z o ' � y m ti � o, m f '� 7 U � c CL of n r � ro l- � i. 1 ; � :• ,Z > o w �. E q p .o '� lt. :> U n. i ul .9 C r p. E!? U1 "' p • C U 0. .ro Cl 0 1:_ 6') UJ v IX LII tM Iti. cR p ♦+ Ci IL ry p 0_ 4 m U_ UI U (h C 45 h O1 iL 7 ► ;. L I 1 0 (n t S CJ .: tC Il f- �. J C IV v� a �� Q r °;_«?aa� .�'��,�° L. ri �4ti 41 Cf. w th rn n. U .l_ C 'D __ tr m+r• Icy Qt m C1 Gh 69 O 1 ,4-�ITtL uJ aj—t'lluI41) OU 7_ Z tl I11 r7 F ry`'_li i-CLz h W 0 F4- 0 s t I 4 Nov. 2, 19'02 t JA E. -i �_' t L,,( i U r C SUiVir F j� i• �,iF T i E 1•a,»_103 E ST I NM E D F I NAN C I NUG RES011RLi=S OPERAl NIG REVENUES Water Sales- �� � . l �=4 . C• 1 Water Connection Fees- 117.340 Total ; 2.3; OTHER INCOME Rental of City Property_30.0 =0D Interest Income ; t.. ;3p Revenue NOC Total :; 4. 30 TOTAL ESTIMATED FINAN IINC- I ESOU?CES ESTIMATED RECUIi?E.P?IT ; OPEPA T INN E XPE',\I SES Pe-rf:onnel Service_: Utilities & Transr)ot ration Materlaks & SUopIte:- i ii9. i ,�5 Depreciation of EcubmE-nt - Equipment. Land -S, Sb-tctur-es Speci1=11 Pavmentr: INTER—FUND TRANSFERS Generalr r-- .ccrund :.� Total ^r;r CGi J T ^IBUTIG�IS TOOT' l � L•enerl•i Fund i 5t; GOO v iter C._tlDitL :'later •71�rr�3ti1-(j !3� vt=- ?. uta i N uv. 12. 19`Jn, t :C,%Miliri>rJITY %.ENITER SUMMARY OF THE BUDGET ESTIMATED FINAINICING FESOURCES OPERATING REVENUES Rent of Propert-,/ 42,000 Swimming Fees C -U Total 70.L`J0 CONTRIBUTIONS FRONT OTHER FUNDS General Fund a 431,125 Total ;; 431,12' TOTAL ESTIMATED FINANC;Ii tG RE1r,0URCE ESTIMATED Rcl,il.�l1 E i�ir-N T S OPERATING EXPENSES Personnel uervic es Utilities & Transpertation Supplies arid: Nbterials Depreciation Equiprnent, Lancs :Sb'W:tilre.s Special Payments . Total T TAl-r: •T11 A. r"\ nrn� •rare +r r, tT!'• 1 IAC•a 1 ISVb TCU RC\ltllrlGt'/1CJV 10 271.zIF5 107,180 0 X00 35.5G0 .j vr?1,1?J SC r7E—UU.LC ( 7 rni c/%4 ♦ .14