The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - October 5, 2011 G-01 PHAGENDA ITEM M, CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION • TM AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adopting Resolution Approving Harney Lane Specific Plan and Certifying Negative Declaration as Adequate Environmental Documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan MEETING DATE: October 5, 2011 PREPARED BY: Public Works Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: Public hearing to consider adopting resolution approving Harney Lane Specific Plan and certifying Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 2010 General Plan designates Harney Lane as a four -lane expressway between Lower Sacramento Road and State Route 99. West of Lower Sacramento Road to the city limits, Harney Lane is generally designated to be a four -lane minor arterial. The Specific Plan covers the area from the city limits on the west to South Stockton Street on the east, as presented in Exhibit A. The section of Harney Lane between South Stockton Street and State Route 99 is not included in the Specific Plan because the roadway widening has been completed as part of development in the area. The section between South Hutchins Street and South Stockton Street will have a number of different geometric alternatives that will be identified and evaluated as part of the design and environmental phase of the Harney Lane Grade Separation Project. The consultant selection process has been completed and the start of work is imminent. The Harney Lane Specific Plan is a planning tool that will be used to guide the systematic implementation of the adopted General Plan. It effectively establishes a link between implementing policies of the General Plan, individual development proposals, and future City capital improvement projects along the Harney Lane corridor. A copy of the Harney Lane Specific Plan Report and Technical Appendices are available at the Public Works Department for review, and an abridged copy of the report is provided in Exhibit B. The Harney Lane Specific Plan will accomplish two objectives. The first is to identify the roadway improvements to be constructed along Harney Lane; the second is to establish the required right -of -sway to serve anticipated growth and future traffic volume increases along the corridor. The proposed geometrics reflect the ultimate improvements required to serve the traffic expected to result from development of the General Plan. It is anticipated that a phased -construction approach will be utilized to construct the ultimate improvements. Therefore, interim geometric plans will likely be implemented to deal with constraints represented by cost, relocation of structures, right-of-way acquisition and accident history. As development occurs along the corridor, ultimate improvements will be required in conjunction with that development project. An important aspect of the design of expressways is the limitation on the number of intersections and other turning movements onto and from the expressway. This Specific Plan assumes that intersections with median openings will be allowed only at Westgate Drive (a future intersection), Lower Sacramento Road, APPROVED: Konradt Bartlam, City Manager K:\WP\PROJECTS\STREETS\HarneyLaneSpecificPlan\CPHSpecPlan_NegDec.doc 9/27/2011 Public Hearing to Consider Adopting Resolution Approving Harney Lane Specific Plan and Certifying Negative Declaration as Adequate Environmental Documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan October 5, 2011 Page 2 South Mills Avenue, South Ham Lane, South Hutchins Street, and South Stockton Street. Further discussion of the geometric design and phased improvement of Harney Lane is provided below. The corridor is divided into four distinct segments for discussion purposes — Segment 1: City limits to Lower Sacramento Road; Segment 2: Lower Sacramento Road to South Mills Avenue; Segment 3: South Mills Avenue to South Hutchins Street; and Segment 4: South Hutchins Street to South Stockton Street. This segmentation is not intended to reflect the phasing of improvements or the sequencing. Segment 1 — City Limits to Lower Sacramento Road Harney Lane west of Lower Sacramento Road lies primarily within San Joaquin County and partly within the City. It is anticipated that the County portion of this road segment will eventually be annexed into the City. The area north of Harney Lane in this segment is within the City's sphere of influence. The area south of Harney Lane is not within the City's sphere of influence and no annexation is anticipated. The houses on the north side are set back a minimum of 27 feet from the existing right-of-way, while the houses on the south are set back 2 to 25 feet from the existing right-of-way. Because of this, two improvement alternatives were developed for this segment. The first is an interim alternative that is not required until the Southwest Gateway project develops, which may be 15 years in the future. Since the houses on the south are closest to the road, the existing south right-of-way line was held, wherever possible, and the improvements were pushed to the north side. To construct the interim improvements, 9 'h feet of right-of-way would be required on the north side of the street. On the south, the two properties closest to Lower Sacramento Road would be affected. The amount of right-of-way required at these locations varies from 0 to 3 feet. By taking this approach, no housing structures will be impacted. The ultimate improvement alternative for Segment 1 would closely conform to the City standard section for a secondary arterial which measures 64 feet from curb to curb. These improvements would be required 30 years or more from now. To construct the ultimate improvements, up to 8 feet of additional right-of-way would be required on the north side and up to 13 feet of additional right-of-way would be required on the south side. The houses on the north are still set back far enough that the extra right-of-way will not impact the houses directly but would reduce the size of the front yards by 8 feet. On the south side, 10 properties are affected. Three of the 10 properties would need to be purchased to build the ultimate improvements. Segment 2 - Lower Sacramento Road to South Mills Avenue Similar to Segment 1, Harney Lane between Lower Sacramento Road and South Mills Avenue is expected to be widened in phases. Interim improvements will be implemented when the City deems traffic volumes or accident levels have created unsafe conditions. The south side of the roadway consists of rural residential homes built on fairly large lots. The homes are generally set well back from the existing roadway. The interim improvements will widen Harney Lane to allow the traffic to flow safely but minimize the impacts to residences on the south side. The ultimate improvements are not required until the properties on the south side of Harney Lane and easterly of this segment are developed. Segment 3 — South Mills Avenue to South Hutchins Street Because there are only three property owners on the south side of Harney Lane, and these properties are likely to develop in the future, there will likely not be an interim improvement alternative. The ultimate alternative will likely be constructed in conjunction with development. The residential homes east of the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the north side have driveway access onto Harney Lane. This access will remain and is complemented with on -street parking and a bicycle lane. In this area, a total of 14 feet is provided on the north side of the roadway to accommodate the parking and bicycle lane. K:\WP\PROJECTS\STREETS\HarneyLaneSpecificPlan\CPHSpecPlan_NegDec.doc 9/27/2011 Public Hearing to Consider Adopting Resolution Approving Harney Lane Specific Plan and Certifying Negative Declaration as Adequate Environmental Documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan October 5, 2011 Page 3 Segment 4 - South Hutchins Street to South Stockton Street This segment is unique due to the Union Pacific Railroad crossing that exists in the middle, as well as special considerations required to support the existing agricultural/industrial uses at the southeast quadrant of the Harney Lane and South Hutchins Street intersection. The City has plans for a grade separation at the railroad crossing, as presented in the General Plan. Design and environmental review of the alternative grade separation configurations and access considerations will be completed over the next 18 months. Frequent opportunities will be provided for the general public to receive information and to comment on the project as it develops. Segment 4 improvements along Harney Lane will significantly impact the agricultural operations at the Costa and Tsutsumi properties on the south side. The Tsutsumi operations are limited to a wine grape vineyard and related operations. Future expansion of the Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center eventually will require the expansion of the South Stockton Street intersection, but these improvements will not affect the access conditions at the Tsutsumi property. The Tsutsumi property will only be affected when the grade separation is constructed. Mr. Tsutsumi opposes the proposed specific plan. Mr. Tsutsumi claims the grade separation project would take a significant amount of his property, thereby, making it not economically feasible to continue wine grape vineyard operations. The Costa property contains a large cherry orchard and cherry packing facility. The operations utilize numerous access locations on Harney Lane and West Lane. During packing season, the facility processes fruit from much of the Central Valley, and trucks are continuously entering and exiting the property. Development of the South Hutchins Annexation project at the southwest corner of Harney Lane and South Hutchins Street will result in the significant expansion of the same intersection. Accommodations for access to the Costa property are provided in the form of a relocated driveway at the corner and, if needed over time, the addition of a new driveway with pull-out lanes opposite the existing Banyan Drive. No other widening along this segment is anticipated prior to construction of the grade separation. The grade separation will be a City -sponsored project and will be constructed as soon as funding is available. Upon construction of the grade separation, the Costas will lose full access to both driveways on Harney Lane by virtue of the raised median that will be constructed with the grade separation. A new intersection access opposite Banyan Drive will allow right -in and right -out turns only at the Costa property. City staff met with the Costas on several occasions to discuss the impacts the Harney Lane Specific Plan would have on their operations and access to their property. Specifically, City staff repeatedly represented that the grade separation alternatives presented in the specific plan were a plan in concept only and did not bind future City action nor did it eliminate or lessen any rights held by the Costas to challenge any subsequent action by the City concerning the grade separation project. The Specific Plan addresses the concerns expressed by the Costas. Public Outreach Two public meetings were held at Henderson Community Day School. The first public meeting was held on June 8, 2010, to present the preliminary Specific Plan, explain the purpose of a specific plan, request input on the plan and give the attendees an opportunity to individually meet with City staff. A total of 52 people attended the first meeting. A second public meeting was held on January 25, 2011, to present residents with an update addressing the comments from the first public meeting, the follow up individual meetings and staff modifications to the Specific Plan. A total of 53 people attended the second meeting. As part of the public outreach, the City staff invited all residents within the project area to meet one-on-one with the project team to further explain the Specific Plan and to discuss the impact to their individual properties. Since not all of the citizens could attend the public meetings, two separate letters K:\WP\PROJECTS\STREETS\HarneyLaneSpecificPian\CPHSpecPian_NegDec.doc 9/27/2011 Public Hearing to Consider Adopting Resolution Approving Harney Lane Specific Plan and Certifying Negative Declaration as Adequate Environmental Documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan October 5, 2011 Page 4 went out to all property owners whose properties would be impacted. A total of 55 residents took the opportunity to meet with the project team. The meetings were either held at the property owner's residence or at the Public Works office. The meetings were successful in providing information to the property owners and in resolving most of the property owners' concerns and issues. Harney Lane Specific Plan Negative Declaration In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the City, as the lead agency, prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit C) and published a Notice of Availability (NOA) announcing that the Harney Lane Specific Plan Draft Negative Declaration had been prepared and was available to the public for review. The NOA was submitted to the State Clearinghouse, distributed to local agencies, sent to interested persons, posted with the County Clerk's office, mailed to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the project boundary, posted on the City's website and published in the Lodi News Sentinel. The 30 -day window for review and comment on the draft Negative Declaration commenced on Tuesday, April 12, 2011, and concluded on Wednesday, May 11, 2011. During the public review period, five comments were received on the proposed Negative Declaration [State Clearing House, California Valley Miwok Tribe, State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 10, San Joaquin County Council of Governments (SJCOG), and Union Pacific Railroad (UPPR)]. The letter from the State Clearinghouse notes that the Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration were circulated for a 30 -day period review and that only Caltrans District 10 submitted a comment letter. It further notes that the review requirements for draft environmental documents have been fulfilled. The letter from California Valley Miwok Tribe notes change of their mailing address. Their comment is noted and City staff has updated their mailing address. The Caltrans letter indicates that a traffic impact study is required for this project in order to determine the proposed project's near-term and long-term impacts to State facilities. The City feels this issue has already been addressed via a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration (Harney Lane Interim Improvements Project SCH#2010072040) and the General Plan EIR 2010 (SCH#2009022075). The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan is an integral component of the City's General Plan 2010, which identifies Harney Lane as a four -lane expressway. No physical improvements or construction activities are proposed in conjunction with implementation of the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Subsequent development in the plan area, including all subdivisions, site plan reviews, planned development review, and conditional use permits will be subject to environmental review on a project -by -project basis. SJCOG notes the project limits are within a habitat zone and future developments would be subject to requirements in effect at the time the developments occur. Finally, the UPRR letter notes that a future grade separation at the Harney Lane railroad is needed. The City notes that planning for the grade separation has commenced and it anticipates completing the design and environmental review of the project at some time in the future. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable. JM224 F. Wally ndelin Public Works Director Prepared by Chris Boyer, Junior Engineer FWS/CB/pmf Attachments K:\WP\PROJECTS\STREETS\HarneyLaneSpecificPlan\CPHSpecPlan_NegDec.doc 9/20/2011 I - �=Y: i i �y � �'^}C � Y'�41a G7R"S4 '1T""s .y� - -" - - _f.��' C 7 f 4"W..1�7.1 ' Lai � �''i_ `I � il. • � � � y��, �� ..,..�. ( i4' I r S r•" � � Ld@tom �F;r�'�" i R.,o,, �� ';u / l ��' ' � Tf �; f' .. �� < ,.� I 'iR � � ' G e �� , 8„A � rtr>:�.- jl �� a ( T,..r�p - ��:'Ll��tx' Fes'• p� .: !. �' �' �s.,...,5: o.-..�::✓' fl -U At li. _ ''`-�' _ • �_ ti ,� Y .�'�. �;. Yt C,:� MUi- tllfi paa 1 _ Y I j -� r f yt�am, 1111 fl __--____.—_ - - - e ' � + 5s q �a !, � ^� 3 ih '� r�} yl1 �,.� .,"�i ."J�� , -vai"' �� • j� ! y {� 0y ;;. u 15, z. Y _ I +, r -:- � !IR's-ems_ _�-. �. '% ;� .��, I _. - _._ , ...: •. I .._. _ __ � ,r, sl, _: I � I - � ,uia..• R ,.I , 'k h1u I�If'.?, � {I �� Inv HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN Prepared for the City of Lodi Department of Public Works 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240 September 16, 2011 Prepared by Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. 7300 Folsom Blvd., Ste 203 Sacramento, CA 95826 Harney Lane Specific Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY September 16, 2011 The Specific Plan has two purposes. One purpose is to complete a public outreach program attempting to reach a consensus regarding the appropriate roadway improvements to be constructed along the Harney Lane corridor. The other purpose is to establish the required right of way to serve anticipated growth and future traffic volume increases along the corridor. The Specific Plan was prepared in accordance with the City framework set out in the General Plan adopted April 7, 2010. Items considered during the preparation of the Specific Plan include future land use, roadway and bicycle network, right of way issues, safety (pedestrian and vehicular), ingress and egress for residents and businesses and environmental issues. The General Plan designates Harney Lane as a four lane expressway between Lower Sacramento Road and State Route 99. West of Lower Sacramento Road to the city limits, Harney Lane is designated to be a four lane minor arterial. The Specific Plan covers the area from the city limits on the west to South Stockton Street on the east. The section of Harney Lane between South Stockton Street and State Route 99 is not included in the Specific Plan because the roadway widening is currently occurring as part of development in the area. Traffic signals are located at Westgate Drive, Lower Sacramento Road, South Mills Avenue, South Ham Lane, South Hutchins Street/West Lane and South Stockton Street. A total of 47 properties are affected by the planned widening of Harney Lane. The first of two public meetings was held on June 8, 2010 at the Henderson Community Day School to present the preliminary Specific Plan, explain the purpose of a specific plan, request input on the plan and to give the attendees an opportunity to individually meet with the City staff. A total of 52 people attended the meeting. Following the public meeting, individual meetings were conducted with 55 residents living along Harney Lane. A second public meeting was held on January 25, 2011 at the Henderson Community Day School to present residents with an update covering the comments from the first public meeting, the follow up individual meetings and staff modifications to the Specific Plan. A total of 53 people attended the meeting. 11Page Harney Lane Specific Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS September 16, 2011 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................4 PURPOSE OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN...................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................ 4 GENERALPLAN...................................................................................................................... 5 LandUse................................................................................................................................. 6 RoadwayNetwork.................................................................................................................. 6 BicycleNetwork..................................................................................................................... 6 HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN....................................................................11 EXISTINGCONDITIONS....................................................................................................... 11 PROPOSED GEOMETRIC DESIGN...................................................................................... 11 Segment 1 — City Limits to Lower Sacramento Road.......................................................... 12 Segment 2 - Lower Sacramento Road to South Mills Avenue ............................................. 14 Segment 3 — South Mills Avenue to South Hutchins Street ................................................. 17 Segment 4 - South Hutchins Street to South Stockton Street ............................................... 18 CostaProperty ................................................................................................................... 20 TsutsumiProperty............................................................................................................. 22 Intersections - Full and Limited Access................................................................................ 22 PUBLICOUTREACH..........................................................................................25 PUBLICMEETINGS............................................................................................................... 25 ONEON ONE MEETINGS..................................................................................................... 25 APPENDIX Appendix A — Proposed Geometries Appendix B — Intersection Geometries Appendix C — Costa and Tsutsumi Exhibits TECHNICAL APPENDIX Appendix D — Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Feasibility Study Appendix E — Public Meeting Reports and One on One Meeting Records 2 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan LIST OF FIGURES September 16, 2011 Figure1— Vicinity Map................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2 — City of Lodi General Plan Land Use Diagram......................................................... 7 Figure 3 — City of Lodi General Plan Development Phases ...................................................... 8 Figure 4 — City of Lodi General Plan Roadway Network......................................................... 9 Figure 5 — City of Lodi General Plan Bicycle Network........................................................... 10 Figure 6 — Segment 1— Interim Roadway Section with Street Parking ................................ 13 Figure 7 — Segment 1— Ultimate Roadway Section with Bicycle Lanes ................................ 14 Figure 8 — Segment 2 — Interim Roadway Section — Lower Sacramento Road to Legacy Estates.......................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 9 — Segment 2 — Interim Roadway Section — Legacy Estates to South Mills Avenue 16 Figure 10 — Segment 2 and 3 — Ultimate Roadway Section with Bicycle Lanes .................... 17 Figure 11 — Segment 3 - Ultimate Roadway with Bicycle Lanes and Street Parking On North............................................................................................................................................ 17 Figure 12 — Alternative 1— Overhead with Side Slopes.......................................................... 19 Figure 13 — Alternative 4 — Underpass with Side Slopes......................................................... 19 3 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN September 16, 2011 The Harney Lane Specific Plan is a planning tool that will be used to guide the systematic implementation of the adopted General Plan. It effectively establishes a link between implementing policies of the General Plan, individual development proposals, and future City capital improvement projects along the Harney Lane corridor. The Specific Plan has two purposes. One purpose of this Specific Plan is to complete a public outreach program attempting to reach a consensus regarding the appropriate roadway improvements to be constructed along the Harney Lane corridor. The second purpose is to establish the required right of way to serve anticipated growth and future traffic volume increases along the corridor. The Specific Plan was prepared in accordance with the City framework set out in the General Plan adopted April 7, 2010. Items considered during the preparation of the Specific Plan include future land use, roadway and bicycle network, right of way issues, safety (pedestrian and vehicular), ingress and egress for residents and businesses and environmental issues. These purposes will be achieved by taking into account and respecting property rights, existing farming operations and business operations located along the Harney Lane corridor. BACKGROUND The City of Lodi is a town located in the northern portion of San Joaquin County, California with an estimated population of 63,000 residents. Incorporated in 1906, the City has grown from its origin as a stop along the Union Pacific Railroad to a mix of manufacturing, light industrial, commercial, residential and agricultural uses. It is bordered on the north by the Mokelumne River and Central California Traction Railroad on the east. Generally, Harney Lane defines the City limit on the south. The Cities of Lodi and Stockton are expanding towards each other. Lodi's sphere of influence extends one-half mile south of Harney Lane. As part of the City's General Plan an agricultural cluster study area was created to preserve a rural buffer between the two cities. Urban development will end approximately one half mile south of Harney Lane. A vicinity map of the area is provided in Figure 1. 4 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 1N80 iiCk 9 lYaotlbridge GoV F - a Car.rr" Ckz ; I.... .l V J { $$ Woodbrigpa Rd £- 11ftioClBritdge -WLuess-Rd- y it- ake: _��' ' , ' '• W -Tumor FA- _ - - #Nermn pMk':� I k Raspy Rd.. QJ 'g lygeinen Ln - _ h E1Cetgenran Ln.-1,W;Keu1M i -In- 'r _ - eiceniaman.Lrl. 14 chorokee Uemxw Park, in �I - r _ 44'"eTm y.Ln-'.- T T E �Y Ln - E Namey LIMITS OF HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN I �Armakrwg Rd= p'mstrang Rd -- - I od Ai"rk =h,1 :- ,.. � ELlwt-oalc<Rd= Figure 1— Vicinity Map GENERAL PLAN The General Plan is the City's vision of how it will look 20 to 30 years in the future. The City of Lodi's General Plan was adopted by the City Council on April 7, 2010. The General Plan established the mix of land uses along the Harney Lane corridor that will, in large part, be served by the circulation improvements to Harney Lane and the adjoining properties. 5 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan Land Use September 16, 2011 The City directs future growth and land uses based upon the General Plan. Along Harney Lane, the designated land uses are a mix of low, medium and high density residential, commercial, mixed use, schools and public parks. The land uses along the Harney Lane corridor designated by the General Plan are presented in Figure 2. Section 2.3 of the General Plan also included a discussion of the three phased implementation of the General Plan. The three phases are indicated on the map in Figure 3. Phase 1 includes the development of vacant land within the current city limits and development of the land south of Harney Lane. There is no time frame predicted for when this development would occur. Roadway Network As part of the General Plan the City reviews the forecasted traffic volumes based on the anticipated growth of the city. The number of lanes for each of the roads in the network is determined from these forecasts. A minimum peak hour Level of Service (LOS) "E" is permitted throughout the city recognizing that some level of traffic congestion during the peak hour is acceptable and that infrastructure design should be based on the conditions that predominate during most of each day. A LOS of `B" translates to a maximum delay at an intersection (signalized) of 55 to 80 seconds. Other items that influence the size and look of a roadway are the posted speed and the access from side streets. Chapter 5 of the General Plan designates Harney Lane from Lower Sacramento Road to State Route 99 as a four lane expressway and west of Lower Sacramento Road it is designated as a minor arterial transitioning from the four lanes to two lanes to the west. An expressway is a high speed -high volume road that has a raised median in the middle to separate the opposing traffic (for safety reasons) and limited access to help maintain the speed along the segment. A minor arterial connects a residential area to major arterials and/or expressways. West of the city the area is expected to remain agricultural and Harney Lane connects the agricultural area to the planned roadway network. Figure 4 shows the roadway network presented in the General Plan. The General Plan establishes the future design of streets in new developments should generally match and extend the grid pattern of existing city streets. This is intended to disperse traffic and provide multiple connections to arterial or expressway streets. An intended benefit of the grid pattern is that citizens will be able to move within a developed area without having to access an arterial or expressway roadway. Bicycle Network Bicycle paths are classified as Class 1, 2 and 3. A Class 1 bicycle path is an independent path only used by bicycles and pedestrians. A Class 2 bicycle path is part of the roadway with vehicular traffic using the traveled way while the bicycle path is separately marked on the shoulder of the road. A Class 3 bicycle path is a road where vehicles and bicycles share the traveled way. Harney Lane from the City limit on the west to State Route 99 is designated as a Class 2 bicycle lane. Figure 5 presents the bicycle network from the General Plan. 6 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan FIGURE 2-1: LAND USE DIAGRAM September 16, 2011 0 Low Density Residential ® Medium Density Residential - High Density Residential Commercial - Downtown Mixed Use - Mixed Use Center - Mixed Use Corridor - Business Park 0 Office Public/Quasi-Public • College/School (Placeholder) 0 Industrial Figure 2 — City of Lodi General Plan Land Use Diagram � Open Space ® Armstrong Road Agricultural Cluster Study Area ---- Urban Reserve ------- Sphere of Influence (2008) --- City Limits (2008) 7 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan FIGURE 3-1: DEVELOPMENT PHASES September 16, 2011 _ Phase I Phase II Phase III Urban Reserve ....... Sphere of Influence (2008) —.— City Limits (2008) 28 1 LOOI GENERAL PLAN Figure 3 — City of Lodi General Plan Development Phases 0 MNFS 8 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan FIGURES -2: GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY SYSTEM September 16, 2011 N Freeway � Minor Arterial ........ Sphere of Influence (3008) 0..... Planned Minor Arterial � State Highway 12 � Expressway Major Arterial " I LODIDENERAL PLAN COI lector ....... Planned Collector Local Street Planned Local Street Railroad Figure 4 — City of Lodi General Plan Roadway Network City Limits 120081 yr x 9 1 P a g e Harney Lane Specific Plan FIGURE 5-3: GENERAL PLAN BICYCLE SYSTEM September 16, 2011 ......+..Future Class I Bike Paths ......• Sphere of Influence [2008] 4) Existing Class II Bike Lanes - — - — City Limits (2008) X .. v Future Class II Bike lanes LOU Existing Class III Bike Lanes • Future Class III Bike Lanes 6-10 1 L001 GENERAL PLAN Figure S — City of Lodi General Plan Bicycle Network 101Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS Harney Lane is located at the southern edge of the current City limits and the City's development. The City limits run along the south side of the street right of way with San Joaquin County to the south. The City's sphere of influence extends further south to a point halfway between Harney Lane and Armstrong Road. Harney Lane is a two lane road with a posted speed of 45 mph. The study area includes approximately 2 '/2 miles of roadway from the City's western limit to South Stockton Street that is partly within the City and partly within San Joaquin County. Ultimately, most of the roadway is anticipated to be annexed as future development occurs along the corridor. Development along Harney Lane is a mix of urban residential, rural residential and agriculture. The north side of Harney Lane is primarily single family residential development consisting of new subdivisions with block walls facing Harney Lane. Within the City limits, Harney Lane has been widened to the ultimate width on the north where recent development has occurred. The south side is a mix of agriculture (grapes and cherries) and rural residences. West and east of Lower Sacramento Road single family residences are present on both sides of the road and most are in San Joaquin County. Between South Hutchins Street and South Stockton Street, Harney Lane crosses the main Union Pacific Railroad. PROPOSED GEOMETRIC DESIGN Harney Lane is planned to be the primary east -west connector across the portion of the city south of Kettleman Lane. A second east -west connector is Century Boulevard as identified in the General Plan but completion of the crossing over the Union Pacific Railroad will not occur in the near future. According to the General Plan Harney Lane is classified as a minor arterial west of Lower Sacramento Road and an expressway from Lower Sacramento Road to State Route 99. Lower Sacramento Road is also designated an expressway (the main north -south connector on the west side of the city) connecting Harney Lane to Kettleman Lane. The proposed geometrics for Harney Lane reflect these secondary arterial and expressway designations and are provided in Appendix A. The proposed geometrics reflect the ultimate improvements needed to serve the traffic expected to result from development of the General Plan. It is anticipated that a phased construction approach will be utilized to construct the ultimate improvements. Therefore, 111Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 interim geometric plans will likely be implemented to deal with constraints represented by cost, relocation of structures, right of way acquisition, accident history and maintenance of existing business operations with minimal interference. In the event a specific development project occurs along the corridor, ultimate improvements will be required to be constructed in conjunction with that project. An example of this is the widening of Harney Lane that is presently under construction at the Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center Project. Existing traffic signals at Lower Sacramento Road, South Hutchins Street and South Stockton Street will be modified in conjunction with the construction of interim and ultimate improvements at these intersections. In the case of the Lower Sacramento Road intersection, it is likely that two separate intersection improvement and traffic signal modification projects will be required due to right of way constraints. In the event accident levels increase, it may be necessary to widen portions of Harney Lane to improve safe operations. An example of this would be a new traffic signal at an intersection with lane additions for turn movements and stacking. New traffic signals are planned for the intersections at South Mills Avenue and South Ham Lane. Another example may be widening the segment of the corridor currently within San Joaquin County east of Lower Sacramento Road. An important aspect of the design of expressways is the limitation on the number of intersections and other turning movement onto and from the expressway. This specific plan assumes that intersections with median openings will be allowed only at Westgate Drive, Lower Sacramento Road, South Mills Avenue, South Ham Lane, South Hutchins Street, and South Stockton Street. Residential intersections without a median opening (right turn in and right turn out only) will be allowed only at Legacy Way, Poppy Drive, Winchester Drive and Banyan Drive on the north side of Harney Lane. An intersection without a median opening (a turn out lane with a right turn in and right turn out only) will be allowed on the south side of Harney Lane (between West Lane/Hutchins and the proposed grade separation) opposite Banyan Drive to accommodate F&L Costa Family property. Further discussion of the geometric design and phased improvement of Harney Lane is provided below. The corridor is divided into four distinct segments for discussion purposes. They are: Segment 1) City Limits to Lower Sacramento Road, Segment 2) Lower Sacramento Road to South Mills Avenue, Segment 3) South Mills Avenue to South Hutchins Street and Segment 4) South Hutchins Street to South Stockton Street. This segmentation is not intended to reflect the phasing of improvements nor the sequencing. Segment 1— City Limits to Lower Sacramento Road Harney Lane west of Lower Sacramento lies primarily within San Joaquin County and partly within the City. The County portion of this segment is anticipated to be annexed into the City 121Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 but probably not in the near future. The north side of Harney Lane in this area is within the City's sphere of influence but the south side is not and is expected to remain in the County. The area consists of single family residences on both sides of the road along with Henderson Community Day School on the south side. The houses on the north side are set back a minimum 27 feet from the existing right of way while the houses on the south are set back from 2 feet to 25 feet from the existing right of way. The area is at the southwestern edge of the city limits and future development. Because of this, two improvement alternatives were developed for this segment. The first is an interim alternative with a smaller right of way width of 69.5 feet designated to handle a smaller volume of traffic while minimizing the impacts to the residences on the south side. The interim alternative consists of three lanes. The three lanes include one lane in each direction and a middle two-way left turn lane. The two-way left turn lane improves the safety to the residents turning into their driveways while allowing the traffic to flow. Vehicle parking is provided for on both sides but may need to be restricted at the Lower Sacramento Road intersection. Sidewalk is included on both sides of the street and signal modifications are necessary at Lower Sacramento Road. The sidewalk on the south side would not extend westerly beyond Henderson Community Day School. Since the houses on the south are closest to the road, the existing south side right of way was held, wherever possible, and the improvements were pushed to the north side. Nine and one half feet of right of way would be needed on the north side of the street. On the south, the two properties closest to Lower Sacramento Road would be affected. The amount of right of way required at these locations varies from zero to three feet. By taking this approach, no housing structures were impacted. The geometric cross section of this alternative is presented in Figure 6 and details of the plan layout and cross sections are provided in Appendix A. The interim alternative is not expected to be needed until development of the Southwest Gateway project occurs at its southern most limits and new street, Westgate Drive, west of Extension Road, has been constructed. The estimated year of construction for Westgate Drive is 2020. The year of construction of the interim alternative will be determined in the future based upon traffic volumes and operations but likely will not occur prior to 2025. R/W 8' 10' 11 SHOULDER STREET PARKING 59.5' 14' 11' TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LEFT TURN R/W 10' 5.5' SHOULDER RA STREET PARKING Figure 6 — Segment 1— Interim Roadway Section with Street Parking (Looking East) Segment 1 is designated as a minor arterial in the General Plan. The minor arterial designation is described as connecting the regional road network (Lower Sacramento Road and 131Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 Harney Lane east of Lower Sacramento Road) with local roads with one typical characteristic being access limitations. The intent of the arterial designation was primarily to allow for greater access controls as future development occurs. Arterials, in the context of the General Plan may be either two or four lanes. The ultimate improvement alternative for Segment 1 would closely conform to the City standard section for a secondary arterial which measures 64 feet from curb to curb including four travel lanes (48 feet) and two bicycle lanes (16 feet). The ultimate right of way would be 77.5 feet including an eight foot sidewalk and setback on the north side and a five and one-half foot sidewalk on the south side. The two and one-half foot setback on the south side is not provided to limit encroachment of the existing residences on the south side of Harney Lane. The geometric cross section diagram of the secondary arterial is provided in Figure 7 and details of the plan layout and cross sections are provided in Appendix A. The improvements would need to be installed when traffic from additional development determines that it is necessary. The additional right of way will be obtained from both sides of the street to align it with the Harney Lane improvements east of Lower Sacramento Road. The houses on the north are still set back far enough that the extra right of way will not impact the houses directly but would reduce the size of the front yards by ten feet. On the south, ten properties are affected and three properties would need to be purchased to build the improvements. The three properties belong to the Geist (APN# 058-070-03), Hernandez (APN# 058-070-04), and Williams (APN# 058-070-05) families and are located nearest to Lower Sacramento Road. Figure 7 — Segment I — Ultimate Roadway Section with Bicycle Lanes (Looking East) Segment 2 - Lower Sacramento Road to South Mills Avenue Along this segment, Harney Lane is populated by single family residences along the south side and approximately one-half of the north side. The remainder of this segment on the north side has been developed as the Legacy Estates subdivision. The houses in the Legacy Estates subdivision do not front Harney Lane like the others do. Similar to Segment 1, Harney Lane between Lower Sacramento Road and South Mills Avenue is expected to be widened in phases. They will again be referred to as interim and ultimate alternatives. Interim improvements will be implemented when the City deems traffic 141Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 volumes or accident levels have created unsafe conditions. The cross section dimension for the interim alternatives varies by location along Segment 2. To simplify the discussion, two sub- segments are presented below. Lower Sacramento Road to Legacy Estates (City Limit) The existing residences along this sub -segment are located within San Joaquin County and development is not expected to take place nor are the properties anticipated to annex to the City. The interim alternative right of way requirement ranges from 62 feet to 69 feet. The interim improvements will be installed in portions of the segment that are not anticipated to experience development in the near future or ever at all. To reduce impacts to residences resulting from construction of the interim improvements, the widening will be limited to a four foot shoulder with no bike lanes or sidewalks. Between Lower Sacramento Road and Legacy Estates (City Limit) traffic will be separated by a striped median. It is anticipated the need for these interim improvements will be driven by the deterioration to unacceptable levels of the operations at the signalized intersection of Harney Lane and Lower Sacramento Road. These interim improvements add a westbound right turn lane at this intersection. The interim and ultimate alternative geometric designs for this sub -segment are presented in Figure 8 and 10 and Appendix A. To construct the interim alternative, right of way acquisition is required on both sides of Harney Lane. On the north side, up to seven feet is required at the Schumacher (APN #058-230- 10) and Galindo (APN # 058-230-06) properties. On the south side, seven feet is required along the Hayn (APN 058-070-07), Bell (APN 058-070-08), and Goff (APN 058-070-09) properties. At the time of acquisition, the City will need to work with San Joaquin County to determine if the acquisition will include only that needed for the interim alternative or include that needed for the ultimate alternative. R/ti+' Var 62'-69' Var 0.5'-5.5 6yarr Figure 8 — Segment 2 — Interim Roadway Section — Lower Sacramento Road to Legacy Estates (Looking East) Legacy Estates (City Limit) to South Mills Avenue For the most part, the north side of Harney Lane along this sub -segment has been developed as the Legacy Estates subdivision. The south side of the roadway consists of rural residential homes built on fairly large lots. The homes are generally well set back from the existing 151Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 roadway. Again, interim and ultimate alternative geometric designs for this sub -segment are presented in Figures 9 and 10 and Appendix A. The interim alternative includes four travel lanes, center striped turning lane, full shoulder improvements (bike lane, sidewalk and landscaping) on the north side and a four foot shoulder on the south side. Additional right of way acquisition is required on the south side that ranges from seven to twelve and one-half feet. The affected properties include Wright (APN 058-070- 12), Velente (APN 058-070-13), S. Everitt (APN 058-070-14), Scholl (APN 058-070-15/16), Tamura (APN 058-090-01), Tanabe (APN 058-090-02), R. Everitt (APN 058-090-03), and Manassero (APN 058-090-04). On the north side, 17 feet of right of way will be required from Lackyard (APN 058-230-21), the property at the northwest corner of the Harney Lane and South Mills Avenue intersection to construct the interim alternative. '°Rik G Vor 84.5'-98.5' 0.5' EXISTING MEANDERING SIDEWALK/ ATTACHED SIDEWALK (STRIPED) Figure 9 — Segment 2 — Interim Roadway Section — Legacy Estates to South Mills Avenue (Looking East) For the ultimate alternative the right of way dimension is 110 feet and includes four travel lanes, landscaped median/left turn lane, bike lanes in each direction and fifteen feet behind the curb for five foot sidewalk, landscaping and utilities. Additional right of way acquisition is required on the south side that ranges from 26 to 31 feet. These amounts are inclusive of the right of way required to construct the interim alternative. It is expected that most of the right of way will be acquired through dedication at the time development occurs. The General Plan includes a future "Local Street" accessing the area south of Harney Lane (See Figure 4). It is located west of Legacy Way. The location of the road shown in the specific plan is approximate. The exact location will be determined by the first property to develop that will be required to dedicate and construct the entire roadway. The road will have a 50 foot right of way, a 34 foot curb to curb dimension and include sidewalks on both sides. 161Page Harney Lane Specific Plan R/W September 16, 2011 R /W - 5' IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS - 5' IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS - 7' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS - 7' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS Figure 10 — Segment 2 and 3 — Ultimate Roadway Section with Bicycle Lanes (Looking East) Segment 3 — South Mills Avenue to South Hutchins Street Similar to the previous segment, existing single family residential development on the north side sets the right of way limit of the ultimate improvements. Existing land use on the south side is agriculture. Within this area Harney Lane crosses a Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID) canal. The WID canal crossing was constructed several years ago and its design anticipated the widening of Harney Lane such that no changes to the crossing are required. There is no interim alternative for Harney Lane within this segment. The Harney Lane ultimate cross section for this segment is the same 110 foot section as Segment 2 as presented in Figure 10 except at the WID canal crossing. At this location the meandering sidewalk is replaced by a roadway -contiguous sidewalk. The four lanes of traveled way and the median are maintained. East of the canal to South Hutchins Street on the north side of Harney Lane are nineteen existing residential properties that have driveway access onto Harney Lane that will continue to be provided for and complimented with on street parking and a bicycle lane. In this area a total of fourteen feet is provided on the north side of the roadway to accommodate the parking and bicycle lane. The cross section for this portion of Segment 3 is provided in Figure 11 and also in Appendix A. R /W R /W - 5' 1N RESIDENTIAL AREAS - 7' 1N COMMERCIAL AREAS Figure 11— Segment 3 - Ultimate Roadway with Bicycle Lanes and Street Parking On North (Looking East) 171Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 The houses on the north will be impacted by the construction of the ultimate improvements because the landscaped median will restrict the property owners to only turning west from their driveways. In addition, as traffic volumes increase on the roadway, the ability to freely back out of their driveway will be difficult during peak volume periods. The General Plan includes a future "Local Street" accessing the area south of Harney Lane (See Figure 4). It is located near Poppy Drive. The location of the road shown in the specific plan is approximate. The exact location will be determined by the first property to develop that will be required to dedicate and construct the entire roadway. The road will have a 50 foot right of way, a 34 foot curb to curb dimension and include sidewalks on both sides. Construction of the ultimate alternative will require acquisition or dedication of fifteen feet of additional right of way in the vicinity of the intersection of Harney Lane and South Hutchins Street. This includes an extra twelve feet of right of way near South Hutchins Street for a future dedicated right turn lane for the eastbound Harney Lane traffic to southbound South Hutchins Street. Along the remainder of this segment, the right of way required to construct the ultimate alternative was dedicated as part of the South Lodi Sanitary Sewer Study and the Harney Lane Lift Station project. Segment 4 - South Hutchins Street to South Stockton Street This segment is unique to the others due to the Union Pacific Railroad crossing that occurs in the middle of the segment. Special considerations are required to support the existing agricultural/industrial uses on the south side of Harney Lane and the existing residential uses on the north side of Harney Lane. The improvements anticipated by this Specific Plan are limited to the vicinity of the Hutchins Street and Stockton Street intersections. The grade separation and the right of way required to construct this improvement will be the subject of a future project that will address design alternatives, environmental impacts and implementation. Information, phasing, and alternatives for the Costa (APN 058-110-47) and Tsutsumi (APN 058-130-24) properties, as affected by the anticipated intersection improvements, and as presented in Appendix B for South Hutchins Street (Intersection 13) and South Stockton Street (Intersection 15)are discussed below. . Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation The City has plans for a grade separation at the railroad crossing as presented in the Harney Lane/Union Pacific Railroad Grade Separation Feasibility Study (Mark Thomas and Company, 2010). The feasibility study, dated August 10, 2010, analyzed the benefits and costs of different alternatives. On the north side, the existing residential subdivision has been set back from Harney Lane in anticipation of a grade separation ultimately being constructed. A 30 foot right of way has been secured by the City on the Costa property, however, the grade separation project will require more right of way from the Costa's property and the Tsutsumi Property. 181Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 Right of way requirements for the four grade separation alternatives are the greatest for the two alternatives which include earth embankments in lieu of retaining wall structures. The two embankment alternatives include an overcrossing and an undercrossing of the railroad. The schematic cross sections for each Alternative 1 and 4 from the feasibility study are presented in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. Alternative 1 is an overcrossing structure with side slopes and this alternative requires the greatest area of new right of way. Alternative 4 is an undercrossing with side slopes and requires the second greatest area of new right of way. An environmental review of the alternative grade separation crossings will be conducted by the City in conjunction with the preliminary engineering design for the project. Once the environmental review and alternative selection has been completed, full design of the grade separation project will commence and final determination of right of way requirements will be made. A copy of the Feasibility Study is included in the Technical Appendix. rL I i is' VAR W. I VAR 5' MIN 2-1 N� 1 2MIN 12' 12' VAR 12' 12' —28 RAISED MEDIAN 1211 /4v— E I PROP R/W R/W I 22 j -1 ---- ---............ --------.-------------------------------------------------- -�--- RAILROAD ACCESS ANDJ UTILITY CORRIOR� Figure 12 — Alternative I — Overhead with Side Slopes (Looking East) 30 - TW ROADWAY EX I � 15' V 30' j D' , VAR 13, 15' 1S' MIN 2 �1 2 �� MIN ----L--?! RAISED MEDIAN Figure 13 — Alternative 4 — Underpass with Side Slopes (Looking East) 191Page Harney Lane Specific Plan Costa Property September 16, 2011 The proposed intersection improvements could potentially interfere substantially with the Costa farming operation and the Costa packing plant. The Costa family has expressed concern about the potential harm of the intersection improvement to the existing Costa farming and business operations. The City has represented to the Costa family that this Specific Plan is a planning tool to establish future right of way requirements and the City commits to work constructively and cooperatively with the Costa Family to limit, to the extent practicable, the interim and permanent interference to the Costa farming and business operation due to the future interestion improvement. The Costa property is located between South Hutchins Street and the Union Pacific Railroad. The Costa's farm cherries at this locaction which also serves as the home office and equipment yard for a second orchard and vineyard located on Harney Lane east of State Route 99. In addition the Costa's operate an agricultural packing plant in the center of the property which is accessed from West Lane and Harney Lane. The property has two driveways on Harney Lane and two driveways on West Lane used by employees, harvesting equipment and large trucks. The first driveway nearest Hutchins Street is located just west of the railroad tracks. In order to accommodate the City's plans, the Costa Family is prepared to relinquish this driveway. The second driveway is located just east of South Hutchins Street and is used for access by farming equipment, harvesting and pruning equipment, employees and large trucks. The West Lane driveways will not be affected by the Harney Lane Specific Plan project. The West Lane driveways will be impacted by development at the southwest corner of Harney and West Lane as well as by increased traffic on West Lane. The Harney Lane and South Hutchins Street intersection is envisioned to be constructed in two phases. Each phase provides the necessary improvements to Harney Lane while limiting the impacts to the Costa property. The first phase is an interim alternative and the second phase is the ultimate widening required to construct the grade separation on Harney Lane along the Costa property. The phasing exhibits are presented in Appendix C. ➢ Phase 1: South Hutchins Street Intersection Improvements. The first phase widens the South Hutchins Street intersection to accommodate the proposed medical center at the southwest corner of the intersection. The first phase includes widening Harney Lane along a portion of the Costa property to add a second through eastbound and westbound lane and relocation of the easterly driveway and gate to a point approximately 300 feet east of the South Hutchins Street intersection. The median along the Costa property would be striped to allow left turns into their driveway along Harney Lane. The improvements will include the creation of an eastbound pull out lane to facilitate trucks turning into the new driveway. This work will require the removal of cherry trees within the existing right of way and within the 201Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 orchard to allow for construction of the new driveway. A diagram of the phase interim intersection improvements is provided in Appendix C. ➢ Phase 2: Construct the Railroad Grade Separation. A grade separation at the Union Pacific Railroad is required to add two additional through lanes to Harney Lane. Unlike the other sections of Harney Lane, the grade separation will not be constructed in association with adjacent development. The grade separation will be a City sponsored project and will be constructed as soon as funding is available. City staff met with the Costas on several occasions to discuss the impact the Harney Lane Specific Plan would have on their operations and access to their property. Specifically, City staff repeatedly represented that this specific plan was not setting future right of way limits for the grade separation project. A separate project will be brought forward to evaluate alternative designs, access, and operations at adjacent properties, environmental impacts and implementation. However, staff has assured the Costas that, with this phase, the Costa's will not lose access to Harney Lane by virtue of the raised median that will be constructed with the grade separation. Additional right of way will be needed. The amount will be determined once the preferred design alternative is selected as part of the environmental review of the project. The Costa intersection opposite of Banyan Drive will be restricted to right turn in and right turn out movements. When the property is developed into something other than the Costas agricultural operation the driveway will be the approximate location for the future road. The roadway will be required to be dedicated at that time. The road will have a 50 foot right of way, a 34 foot curb to curb dimension and include sidewalks on both sides. The Exhibits in Appendix A and Appendix C present the access accommodations at the Costa property prior to construction of the grade separation (Appendix C) and following construction of the grade separation (Appendix A). City staff met with the Costas on several occasions to discuss the impacts of the Harney Lane Specific Plan would have on their operations and access to their property. Specifically, City staff repeatedly represented that the grade separation alternatives presented in the specific plan were a plan in concept only and did not bind future City action nor did it eliminate or lessen any rights held by the Costas to challenge any subsequent action by the City concerning the grade separation project. The Costas expressed concerns about the effects the widening of Harney Lane would have on the access to and operations of their business as well as the safety of trucks, vendors and employees under the existing conditions due to increased traffic on Harney Lane. The specific plan addresses the concerns expressed by the Costas. 211Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 Tsutsumi Property Mr. Tsutsumi operates a vineyard located between the Union Pacific Railroad and South Stockton Street. Access to the vineyard is available at two locations on Harney Lane, west of South Stockton Street. A row of houses is situated between the Tsutsumi property and South Stockton Street blocking access to South Stockton Street. There is no interim alternative for Harney Lane within this area. The ultimate construction of the railroad grade separation will affect the operations at the Tsutsumi property. The grade separation will widen Harney Lane and construct a raised median. The raised median prevents the harvesting equipment from making westbound left turns into the Harney Lane driveway. The harvesting equipment will need to enter the property from the eastbound approach. The driveways on Harney Lane will need to be widened beyond their current width to accommodate the trucks turning in the property. A diagram of the Tsutsumi access configuration is provided in Appendix C. Mr. Tsutsumi opposes the proposed draft specific plan. Mr. Tsutsumi claims the ultimate build out of the grade separation project would take a significant amount of his real property and require such a substantial realignment wine grape rows and irritation lines that it would not be economically feasible to continue farming operations. Intersections - Full and Limited Access The expressway design for Harney Lane between Lower Sacramento Road and State Route 99 will limit full access intersections by spacing them approximately one half mile apart. The planned full access intersections are Westgate Drive, Lower Sacramento Road, South Mills Avenue, South Ham Lane, South Hutchins Street, South Stockton Street and Reynolds Ranch Parkway/Melby Avenue. The Reynolds Ranch Parkway/Melby Avenue intersection has been constructed as part of the Reynolds Ranch project. Limited access intersections are those that restrict turning movements to right turns from and right turns onto Harney Lane with a prohibition of left turn movements. Planned limited access intersections include Legacy Way, Crown Place, Poppy Drive, Winchester Drive, Banyan Drive and the four future road intersections on the south side of Harney Lane. A short discussion about the improvements at each full access intersection is given below. A diagram of the geometrics for each intersection is included in Appendix B. Westgate Drive — Westgate Drive, the future road across from the Henderson Community Day School, is part of the Southwest Gateway planned development. The road will form a three-legged intersection on Harney Lane from the north and will be striped with crosswalks due to its proximity to the school. When the Southwest Gateway development is constructed the timing of the intersection construction will be determined. It is included in the interim and ultimate proposed geometrics for this segment of Harney Lane. A traffic signal will be installed in the future if required. 221Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 2. Lower Sacramento Road - Lower Sacramento Road is the main north -south connector between Stockton and Lodi on the west side of Lodi. Between Kettleman Lane and Harney Lane, Lower Sacramento Road is designated an expressway. It is a main part of the city's grid network planned to serve large volumes of traffic moving from Kettleman Lane to the southeast area of Lodi. Harney Lane is part of this connection. To serve the high volume of southbound to eastbound left turn traffic, dual left turn lanes are incorporated into the intersection geometrics. The existing traffic signal at the intersection will need to be modified to accommodate the additional through lanes and left turn lane. 3. South Mills Avenue — South Mills Avenue is a collector street that will be extended southward as new development occurs. It will become a full access intersection on Harney Lane. Signals will be installed with the extension of South Mills Avenue. A single left turn lane will be provided for eastbound and westbound traffic on Harney Lane. The intersection is currently signalized and will need to be modified to accommodate the widening. 4. South Ham Lane — Similar to South Mills Avenue, South Ham Lane currently tees into Harney Lane and will be extended southward as new development occurs. The General Plan designates South Ham Lane as a major arterial to the north of Harney Lane and a collector road to the south. Signals will be installed with the extension of South Ham Lane and single left turn lanes will be provided for eastbound and westbound Harney Lane traffic. 5. South Hutchins Street — Similar to Lower Sacramento Road this is a main connector road between Lodi and Stockton. In the General Plan South Hutchins Street is a major arterial which serves the downtown area of the city. At the intersection it will have dual left turns for the north and southbound traffic. Single left turn lanes are provided for the Harney Lane traffic. Two eastbound and westbound through lane will be provided. Traffic studies indicate the future requirement for a dedicated right turn lane for the eastbound to southbound turning movement on Harney Lane. In keeping with the General Plan policy to promote pedestrian friendly intersections this dedicated right turn lane is included in the specific plan but is not recommended for construction in the foreseeable future. Right of way for the additional lanes is required on the south side of Harney Lane as indicated on the diagrams provided in Appendix A. The intersection is currently signalized and will need to be modified to accommodate the widening. 6. South Stockton Street — The roadway tees into Harney Lane with a dead end road extending to the south. In the future the dead end road will be widened allowing access to the Reynolds Ranch project in the south area. Similar to South Hutchins Street intersection the eastbound Harney Lane will initially be served by a through lane and a combined through/right turn lane. When South Stockton Street is extended and the traffic 231Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 warrants it, the combined through/right turn lane will become a through lane and a dedicated right turn lane will be added. The right of way is reserved with the Specific Plan. The existing signal will need to be modified. The intersection is currently signalized and will be modified to accommodate the widening. 241Page Harney Lane Specific Plan PUBLIC OUTREACH PUBLIC MEETINGS September 16, 2011 Two public meetings were held at Henderson Community Day School. The first public meeting was held on June 8, 2010 to present the preliminary specific plan, explain the purpose of a specific plan, request input on the plan and to give the attendees an opportunity to individually meet with the City staff. A total of 52 people attended the meeting. A second public meeting was held on January 25, 2011 to present residents with an update addressing the comments from the first public meeting, the follow up individual meetings and staff modifications to the specific plan. A total of 53 people attended the second meeting. A full report on each meeting is provided in the Technical Appendix. The format of the two public meetings was an open house with work stations exhibiting the four segments. A staff member was present to explain the specific plan and to answer questions at each station. A power point presentation was given describing the need for the specific plan, the proposed geometrics, the timing of the implementation and contact information which the residents could use if they had further questions. Questions were received and answers provided as reported in the minutes of the meetings. ONE ON ONE MEETINGS As part of the public meeting, the City staff gave the residents an opportunity to meet later for a one on one meeting to explain the specific plan further and discuss the impact to their property. Since not all of the citizens could attend the public meeting two separate letters went out to all the property owners whose properties would be impacted. This outreach provided them additional opportunities to have a one on one meeting with the City staff to discuss the specific plan and their property. A total of 55 residents took this opportunity to meet with the project staff. The meetings were either held at the property owner's residence or at the Public Works office. Most of the meetings were informational since many of these people were not able to attend the public meeting. Discussion points included: • What is the purpose of the Specific Plan? The Specific Plan acts as a blue print of what Harney Lane will look like based on the policies set forth in the General Plan. City staff will use the specific plan to guide development of properties along Harney Lane to provide for implementation of the Harney Lane expressway. • How much right of way will be needed from my property? An exhibit for each property was created showing the amount of right of way needed. If the property was 251Page Harney Lane Specific Plan September 16, 2011 located in a segment where an interim condition occurred, a second exhibit was created showing the right of way needed during the interim phase. • When is this development and street widening going to occur? This was a significant concern and a common question. It was explained that the specific plan was a planning document to be used by the City to direct the individual developers as to what would be expected of them with respect to the widening of Harney Lane. The street widening was not expected to occur in the near future. Much of the widening will occur with development. If widening was required, the City would acquire right of way through a formal acquisition process. • How will I get compensated for the right of way taken? The City will require a development project to dedicate needed right way as part of the project. Acquisition of right of way outside the limits of new development may follow an informal process if initiated by a developer or a formal process if initiated by the City. • By acquiring the right of way the house will be closer to the roadway making the property less valuable. Will I be compensated for that? This is referred to as "severance damages" and would be included in the offer to acquire the property. There were some questions and concerns that were brought up from the residents that needed follow up on the staff's part. These concerns were: • For the segment west of Lower Sacramento Road, by acquiring right of way, you are reducing the size of the driveway and front yards; why not include street parking for the residences? The recommend geometrics include street parking. • Why does the median have to be so wide? Less property would need to be taken if you reduced the size of the median. The median is sixteen feet wide and provides room for the left turn pockets and narrow median at the intersections. 261Page Appendix A Proposed Geometrics I - . . � I I � .. 1-1- -1 . I - -1 I - � I I . I .- .11 I-. - ��wll_ �_l - I-- ; .. ..... � � 1 - , . , . , � I . . 1. . . . . . � I I . - . - , I � ., I I - _�. I � . - I __ � . . . _ _ " __ . I . -, .. 11 I I I - � , - . - -7K ;_ ", , I - __ I - - I - . . 0 --,, - ,.;,. , �'.- _-�_'�- , -. . ,�, . .��; , - .. --� - , , % ,:,,. i - .. . " -1 ��j�- ;�_ _. �: , :� -41� :1 . . � I - *W� . , I I W"w'- : "Alm -k, . � , - . . - , - - .;. 1�-;�v --- _�- 11 .i � .. .r � I � I I IC- I , - � . � , I 1� � . I I-) - , - -�_:,: , - - �� ,'� -, . I � . - I -Z - ; . . I I - - , - -, "' , 'I-, , _-, , ., , __�_l : � � .11-_1 - 1".. . - I_. - _ __ - __ 1, I �_17"_.,_�llk - � , - . P�, -,, � _-,� I _r " , , , , - . - : : -: I 1 3 11 .1 �l � . I : � � I - - . _�;�� ,�, - ,;.4 ia-�_4��4� ,��,r,;�,rz .. , � .,� , � - - , 4� , - I " T7, �_� " 7 iv, . . I .- _. . . I � � I I 1. 11 � 1. � I . . -:C . �� . . � � .; - -� e,"�;.,_4',��,� ��,, ,�,-,,,�'.,-'-�,,��,'-;I,iL�i��4,-,--.-��F�,--.�;� --,,;��" � ` f "' �psq . � N -1 I 't _� � ,�:. . � .� , . 6 -�C- 1. .. � ,.C_ , , . . ,� �, , ,' , - , , � .., . I -11 :. I - 'w -7!s��,_.- " - I I I—— - I I— %__ - , � ".. - IC '�� 1. 1. . 1. � .- , - � 1A � - � � , - - " - ��,-,�.''-� �_,�,�-'-...��--;-4�;-",.,�;�.�,�il,�,,-.��'ll,�:,��.,--"--.-,:-.�.�;i",-,;�-%-,v,�.t�',.�,._--�,-,-,,��,�---.�,;--�-�,��4�,-?��..�,��.'-",'-'-�-.,i:�:.�,:: '�'""' lif ' 77 1 �1- - �kj�-;I,�� , I . - � 1. % � � I , I ._---1 1. - � - 0�;��4�_�N_J_ ____.__.__=-- ��,-�,'., : "!:,.:,A;-!�'�7 I � . .0 - , _____ � '13 - - I :-. _, , " �: .- I I.- . 1. . --__-i__: __'� :�;%, " 11 I , .l.l'_ � I - ,:,.. 4�� , p 11 . _ I , . � . . I " ,4 , -,,,, -_ �. I , Z,.�,�,�, I -1-1 �� _Z - , - -, I � �, I I I . , - �- 1- . . , , ------ -1-1 - -"-''.-��-''.-,-�.----�-,:,-�--�lz,t.��-;7,�,��'-'�;.".%��,�,,�,-,LI _7 -.. 4-, , . � :_ -11 I I _'-, - � -- __ - - ��_ __ _,_ � - .". , , , , , _, ) , � I � '. � .", 'Ell .1 � 1: - I - I I - " , ) I .. I . , '' � -j--. �� , - K - � I " - , __ , �. _. , , I , , " W-_ ��" �.. 1: , , � �1_11 Y, -1 � ii _ � , - I - - , F-_ , � �� - ,., .- � -1 - _ - I - '. . !!.. . . I .1 �z;� " , - __',:,-l . � 'rC�� , i ��','i.,, �� I � � . I . - - ""'",_ 11 --.-'I--.,-- . . 11. - 1_- . I - . . ._F��IACI - � . I I ---,,- - 1,11�711 �� - , .,.-, I . - . .. . - �,,,- ,,. .�. "' , �� " " I . W I - 7 -_ �' I I r Ol - I - t�,�, il - I L � � I 1. _. I . I I -,,,---,.,- 11_�� -:,�_._,_`n;� -1. , �:z_r-;�, -_",,.;_;,� , , " _� _, - - - '.., . �,, � - . . I � � I : I - - I ...''111.1111 . � 1 , 1� '', �_ -1 . . I L _4,m�_�.'.-,. g;,�.--�_,, -C-,-,-_ ��_-4rl�'.' ��; '-',, -,,, � ". . . . I -_ I L__ . . . I I . -11 1:-11.11 ,,, - --1 _,�- 1� -, ,�� -�. -:� - - - , - � - , ,��,!� k f 11 � I � 11 I I . 'A � . . I I I _,�l ,--- � , � - ��_, _�-_��"-4,4, �i�, _� ,�_,:�,;��;,� , .� : " - . _<-,� I ... � . . - : _., _,� - . I.. - I I _.. I " � � '' - �_;__ . ", : . ,��. - ,..-:, I- - I - 1. r". 1C, � , � '4FL .Zl� � . 'IV :_1 1�_ I " I O - .%- I � - - - � ':'. I _ - �1_ .!.,��, � ��,_ - _z� , I I " 4 - � ; I c I m", , : - - I I I", � � �. -.- 'r �,- .- ...... �,�_, , 1. , .11 . _____ I .__�' - . . , ; �, i�- -� - , !-�� -- �;4.�L,4_141.4 9_1�� _. �.,�,i�-,�l t%�j .7777 .. li"_ - I'l.; - - I .:1 It- I t- . "7_�l - �. ,� -(�j � - . . I I , , . ,�,, _ %C- �l I "*� I , , �Z�_ �� I I - -, - � - - - - - , I - �, " .�__ - � :;-�T, :--:��,,.-,:,�,,�i-�. � �_ I . , _.. , , � , I -_ " ,.:� . 7 . , �._ I - . " , , . , I I . , . I . I � . ,� _ , , , " �, �- -, .., J -j ,r�;��_��, _! --- I . . 1-1 I It ,� -11 , _. I.. I . -. I � I - . - - , - : 1�� , , - I ,1' I , , �' - ". . , � I :- .� , -,��Ci, ll��t�,`�-,C,,'_ �, "' _r?4_ _ _ -1 ��L-�� .� : I I . � , , 11 I - �l I . _,� I - - - ,;, . I , - -, % I . � -��,_ '� . I I I& -_ - , ! "" - -11 I I . I . 1-111 I , ,,, . , __ ___ I � I -.11 - _.C�,__�-:I,C:C�_ CC;- ,�_�._��-Zt,- ..47�,-�� __'_4;.� ;��- :'_,-�;,.-,�-�'-,,;� ;4X4-,�-jC' _'-��',�W�',.",;CL �r'�t..A,__,� _" I . T -lo , - , , L__ . - I - : __ - _ I--,. , � � -11 '17 --.,-.If , .__�_ �:�._ . __,�-�-,�; �_ _: � - I , ." 1, � � I . I I , . - 1. � . I I � , , � . . - � � I � . 1-1, , _�, t _,,� I , , -"- . . . I 11 � 11 I I - . . - -1 _ . , _ � - (1-1 , - -. I 1-1 �l . ,mll , q � .. if , - , I I 1� I I, i !�& � , I I I,--"- t � t- ' ' ' ' � ' ' � L -, �a I I I . � - - . . "I ,,;, 1�tl,11.11 " Cw . I �, , _1 - - - - -1 - , � _4 i I . IV , . 'I'll � . . ,C� . / " � '. . I - . I .1 - l- . 11- - .11 11 I . �, � I., - - -1 I I - I � . . . A� � .1 11 � , . . I I I - " I �" ;: , , s � , P� i , -, T � - � . I . : W - � , I- � I,- - � I I A , - I - I . � � I - . . � � , ., - � i , __ - - 7 � I _-jlp, [-jjjjj_Ce_:�_;,;� �,�.,' ;�� - ,��, ,�-:�, ,�. , j,"', , , " "" , - I � I I I I I . , �.�- i, _z� � �' - I , , . � L � .1 � Al ��: I 7_7 I � . . . 11. � -, ; 'III, .1 � . , , - I- , 11- I - - - %V_�d� 1. . .1 I I - , � '�_ . %-, - 41" , 7 �,� ,. I "I , --. t n, ,�� I � "��! ��:-: � _ _ - � .� , I - . , , I " - � 'c' . . , �. .1 %tsi_r- - ,y 11 - I I I I - -, '' - " � � . I ��_ � 1, "." m _L� I _'11.9� � iz 4 � ," _. . , I " - I ", -, . -.1 -.--. � . _ -� - � -__�,��-4 , �-�'�,��.`, � -�__N�:.�.,�� . . I __ . I �,� . �__ 4�,_ i , , , j . . .1 - � ". - - __�-� I , .- 0 , ,C� I I . I � . , � I - - - - . - .1. � , ;: __ , I . - I I , , - . . . I - � _. .. -- -- -_*_l ,�-! I " � � �l , I � A� .1 4 - - LZ I " kv , -l"r-_ .1 .. _. - - � - -1. 1-111 -1.11 - - _ . - . -1-11-11_1 -1-1.11- - I—- , - , -1 - I - , . -1 I . 1 "-'-7�","':�-�-,'--�-I'�","-'��,"--�-�, -" -, , - ' I - ' .. d , . - ,, , , -(-i , - el CO- -L�:,,.,-(j3 7, �A ,!- C., � �� I -7, . - . I .1 . � - .1 , : 7- " - "' "" ' -:'�:'� � I r- ,' - . - I . I I � _,�.��4_ - �,'.:��_-.�, ,`_,,�.I;�-7��77-.�.;oj_ _ ��O�" F) , -; L_ , _ co) I �i, -, � I ." , - - lolr�,�� I i 7 .1 -�' � .i - ., � I �__ __ zz-: E I � - - - _ - -. -1 I L ' .� . ....; I -1 . . , - , , - �l -1 I I I OR �l - "' : "", . '. *:_7% __1 . - - � 111- - - __ ,, ,�,� � . - I _j, !�,I,,7- t _ -; : 7.__ 1. .1 .. I . - . - - _F ,- - -_ . I I I . - I � � ---"--,-..-., - 1_f� -1 _,_C-,�,-,W-j7 ,I- ,'�;;_-. - -- ,-.1�,�,�;;�,��.,-%;�,�,�i-,%.-i��'., , ;'-','.'�,"��t'_� -�'%%wr�Ai4� !�'�w.�_,.`: It __ �'(,,. .; - t.!�_ . ,,��': ". -,; - " z �- , , , I - . , ST I .11 __;_ F. , . _,: ,. , _7 .. ..... ;_tl -, � , � ,; -i__ I - - - L � I ", I � � i � - F -, ?, am* 7- - � - - L- -- " ; , 1 . � � : " , - , !�� ,% 6 �z , � ,, � AMM I , .1 � I . I ,� , , � - I . I 4- I , . . 7 .. I 1. -111 1-1 . . , - . 1-1 , I_. � , �V� - I - (z I - w - O " I , . - - , - - . - I I : _ �__ I -.1 I - -11 _� , I - . 1. __- - . ; � � 1. I— .:: ., � . , "., I ,,��_, 11 I 0- 'L, �, I , -6 -�, " "' , - I ., -�k . I . - . . 1. I - - , � I C I _=� . I" , "': . - ,.. . . , - - , � -, . , ", ',ff I "YON - . - �l I I I AL, I , " _ , � I 11 .. , I .C- .1 I I 11 i � "�" - . i�:�'. -1-7 , . I � �l ___, . I - 1. -�;, - . � � . - , 1. --1 .,_,_ "�,� _-� - " , - "', , , - 4 --v �C ,� , 4, c IFS?l c L �l ."_ .. , .1 I I : . � � ,111" � � __ ____ � ____.._.. - � ��;�A�" _�51�'��,�4? �. ?),��",��: � �li.,.,,�,,Zll I � I I I � � t L_ LL A, I ��l - ,� , , , - " . -- - - - V , - I I I I . I I 11 '_ - - , � , , I �, _: , - - __'_� � , L�:_ ;_, � , , .... L . M�� - __ , , � , � ,t , - , - V ", . 0 1 - . 11- - - I— _. - . - , � _ , - -1. I k,. I - � , t I f "I � . . I " I 1. . . I 1, - . . I ... 1. I �:_� I I—. - - . li� � - I- � � -"-: - , �:__,-_ ','m_-'lC-,' ��-,',��-.��,��,-;,:,-,��,�',�-�-;--�--- X�` __ , _", " � �,_�. A_'� ,�.'_' � I �'�"�:7 :�,� L.'�,I: E_ 4!, 1�,;,_ ��'� . LT ll.� .. . , I - Ir . . - I 1`1 I - - -�_w ,-_--e---'- -, - , - - ��- �;� - , � , '. 1-11 . - I � I- � — "Y - � ':. tl2 - � �, �.: , -4, - - . � - L--_ _ - III lr� . I I ; I I -11 lil .� 1. I , � i -1 - � I . I ��-� - - , I - . _r-- . . �,�,t 1 � o I I . I - . , � - . ji U-! I I ., -1 . . I—— , �J4;oo_l - . ._ , - - - , ,- � - - , T%_ - - -L - .�l-"�i':?��-'�-�'��l;--'�"---,-� S:4 -,4k,� �,,, �,�� " - ., , % I � .. 1. . - � . .. . � . � , - - - , , !� I , 16r- .� - - -F . � , . : I - : I I , - I _ I - � - - .1, - ,,, .1 _ L - __ - __ � - , - - : rz- . - . � �� n.�,� �,,;_ I , , � .� 1, , - I .: I , - .�.. .I A�� ! , . �l 5�_l 1 � , , r. . ;Cm��-'.m--;:l:_%. V, � I � . I - k� ,,, I.- t - .r � �� - , " - 7 I - � - � 1-1 �-_ll , , "I -1 11-1.. 1. � � � ` " :. ",-.1 rj I I � 0 1_��. - - - �C 11 r � , 1[ ., I - , , I I .1 - _.� �_ - 1: --17-.v. 1 r - 1-1 - - , " - - , v W �, - m I - � I � - . � -1 1. I I � 1,11_1 . . it'i , 1 , -, -,_��-', - �t� : . �,', - , r - I ;,��q - , , � .. " - � � A I I . � 11 �1, - - "' I � I -, , � 9, --- _. I- I I � ;,�q '�- , %,�� ,, . '' _., , � �!�:�� - - -�'.-:-� :,,�'4._i�'/1�1___lfl, ;=i�,.`;,-ill , 4 , - T I � 1. . I - �_ � -;- , _�- ' _, , - -,--- _ , I " - p . . , , ,- , - , ti� I , I " "IT , . . I I .1 1. -1 - - _, � " � I . ��_�,!-_.�, -"-' � � � - , �, . . �� I I . I I I I �,� . , - 11 1- .1 _ , - " .- , " . � � �� - � , " ,j ,: : -, . . 40� �,�A'3, 1 _4 ' _L' - , , I . -1 I 1. � .__ � I - 7� � '1� __�__ -1 I � I 4i. - "' , " 17 _ ", ., , , , I - , Z - L" (b - I ' '. � -, - 1 . I I . , I I I . �, I -:, .,�' -- '..'' , - . , , I � . . ,., I . I I - .�_.J"!��-�,,, 1 ,,_,4��,,,�, 4 t , ,,,,,,,, 11"M go, . . - � - . , 4p, - � , . I I I I I .1 . 1. - � _: � - -1 - : _ , , - , - � �-) : 11 � I ,� I , , , .. ,�� P !rl_c,i I ... I � I I 1"... - 1-:, - _ . I. , " , , � , I ,,, � , I? c I " . I I . . -11 - %.: __ - �:_ __ - - _. __., . I - I .�. ?" - . - , 1 �. � . , �� , , ,r�-:Ai,` I :� , '�' � . , r.. - �: . f . � -, .." I - -11, - -_ _. - ., I -,. � , , . - - � I I � - , 11, . - 11 -1 - I . - - _ _ �, -- � � I I—— - "' _ � � - ' ' '�, ', " -_' __'. � , 1 . _ 1. I ��r ,�-'- - - , V 2� � � I , , � - - . - . - ,. - ., ': . r _ , ,. _ 1-1- ;-1 - I - " : " .:.. -11 I I L, .. �_ 1. � . . �_ , . � r - I . - - 1 �47,� - ---." ___, ,--:r"_. _.,, C'_ Z��_ ,,,%� -.1 - -�, �- AM;, g , , � .. "I � . �' - " I ___,�_-_.__-_ ; ;�4��, �_71_`�I�l ��'�� :t " I - . I , " I r , - - � 4 1 1 . VKV 71 . � - I . _ . �', ' , �, L'. �4�� , L X_ � ___ . _;, _� . 7 - I . . , . I 1.�� - . I L��,�4 �;� �.. �_ � ., _,L!::�, " , - - . , ,l ��tl '. , - ff . . . . " - I . � - - w _ .. . -1 I . I 1, . - - _*Cw�_ -, m -p - .�=,,, 3�� . ,'o � � .. - I .1 _�, I 'I � 'r ��l - - � A I I '.1 I . � I - - __ I _ I . _1 11 I - I L . ., - r r : 1-1 c7AD .." r,, ... � I I 11 - : I . 7 - L ;t Id, I ��c , : - - � - Z, , I . - . - i � .1 . R I I . _,, _ �,; � � _' � �� ,_ . _.�� i;6�� I... L,'i - _' ,, , _ _ , ,_, __ ... , , - * " e I . . , , : � r � L� - - ,-1 .- � _ . " , ,p . - �' -0 b � I 6 r N �pl s ,/ .oC. rI,i - . I I .: �W - �� -, -- -_ _ ___ I __ I . I - -1 - _; .- . - I .11 - I - C, I , P_ '� . I 21m I __ - - __�l . - - _ __ .r , - �; � -, - _. . . , , r . I - . . , - WIMM"ll I , - .. - _____ - -_ _ ----,-- - --- . � � - -1 __________ - - - - _____ -_ ,f�______.__ ______ --- ____ -_ I . - I 1, , - . A , - � ""I : .c r _. _� I ,�, Wn - - tidkiem�� 11111 I ___ - , , � ` � ', . _ ,I � � _. � _ . � ,:. �,__. _:, � I , , " I - -a - .� ;r, - 11 - I . . . - .1 - 7r,W - - _____ __ -!!!!!'i-i0i , I :_1 ida L .. I - . I i�:i;_,!�Pl 1-1��,�,� -; ,.�,,�,_'_ I - � I - , , , , � � �2 1 v , - __ �� _1 � I , C T . __ - --T - .- . ---,. -L _�l ___ I --� , ______ 1. _. - , .� . I - Q ... _ - . � I j .. - ___ I '. ___ I p � .= 1-,i�,, Elmicmr�.. - - I I 1� x: -_ � -:- ,-;2!mT!, - - 1� � _,-�:im. ,�wm�, ,;w - ` E_` . - C::---. - - �Am 1�_ ., : --- - - - - ___ ____ , I . - - - -71� tC�_ I - I � - X, -,",_ ,; - - 1", f��,,,', _.7�85r,�:__'_ , &� �_ - . I - - - - I I c -, 1- I ___ --..-. �� __---7ml,F7 � � 5,�10. 1. - I . 11 , 1,, I __ ___ - _-1 L Lr �mwlw A — I ..: -_ , _ 1�_ - - __ __ j5lz�--- -Q�:4 ;; i i � 1�1 . --I- _ _"-,:,,� , I ,� - __ I i _ ,,, i �"`_�� L. - - -4 -, � 'C-1 -, , , I'-- ____._-q .11, -_ , I - c . n �:, _� I ---- ------ - �_Vl -t o. - ,�` U . , I . 11 - -t - mlo�' - . I � --7".Q,- , --- � 11 ,� I I � ; ', - ! �11 ; - - , � - I- I , , I __ __ � 11 , , � �:%:, : ", '�� " '%*. -1 " - - I 1�� :,, � - ", , _ 145�§, , �__' "'Z �t� . - - I . .. � - , � � � - - __1 , - - - . _______ __ .1. � � - � - 'a - -"," ----- -__ I _�t�, '� ,� - '' - -� - =2! 1 -- � - -;6 -i�-oz:�--�, k1l ��! , ..-----.-- ____ - - AxF "� ;,� " ll� I i " , r. I 7 . I , C --- - 6awl 1 ... I I _... � 11, . , F_ - ( W_ _��_ -i -, --, 7,;;te ��vv,�4;: , �� - I a �= , �r I . MW,7 Wrr � I I. "r-1 �iww___`. . � � I I . I I . - - r� __ _j, ----,- l;, 11 , - , " , X, - �' � - - r - fj� 1. , ; . . , ,,, , -�. - �_ S-1 �lli��ll 7 --t I -r I . �_impj�_- , ,Cii�___. I -1 __ - - rri . 1: � 7 . - � �. - � . I . I I - _-_ - __ - , PRO �Fllw - _1 � - 7, i . 1: I I- - ... `t� I �_ - i! �_ _ - - - -..w I A � - ,��- i ^�Cim- C - - i `�- %. - _ , - I I I --- - � �,�r LIL . �_, - . . I , .� '. I I � - - - - �- - - - - - - , � - " "� . I -1. . - - . _W . I . . � , . : , - ____ ow, - �� . 11 . � .. - I - I I , . _11.� .11 ,,, 1. �11�'. ` -1 . 'e- . � . 7:1- . - , _ , 77 - - - - --I - ---I- - ,,, - T -_ - - ----.-. r--.- -_ _ - , -WE �, , _�'l - I --k . �� I 7r*_____lT," . - ,�, __ 11 - __ .. 7 i - O v,- W �l -, � �_ r4t " -_ Aliff � . .- - 1 7 - 77* . I I , I I 1. � - C ,- 11 I r. -,"W" I - r1l; - �17 14 IF . . 19- - � l,"'! !7-- . ; . I . f� . . . I _ll � i �- J- I - I,. , � 11 �e7 . , . ,..l . . , --, : 'R.F,,�. 4 - - ,_ ".� - J. 1_�� I . I �. . ,. - ____ - - - - I . __ I t - -f -N� I .- I I , . - , - �171zlf'�- , Z�,�,,� I . ,,, I � i. _1 - ____�l *-S T_ 1-1-1- � - 1, , - - � . , C % I � , . � I � . 4�ty., I , Z * 4ft& , �� I .. - I � � �` j � I I I , � , " " , w - - , I � I )r- .. la I � I � �F,��i�� C -_ I ,� I � � .-I A � � r , C .. b " L mr,77 - " , , � , �M� L_ 14 A r .1 \ - -7�� A , ,- I � ...'', . . r . 1� � . I - - , , -,�,4, , � �? , . , . � ', , � - � - - .1 MlF==ffZ _.�l , 11. .; I . � � 1, 11 . I I '�� I - I � �,*,�- � - " � . ��A_ �l � i ,� " , 1p�#,# - -- VK : . a ,#,,,: . I � All_�l ,'. � 1, 1� I '' , r 1- 1. m I I I . I ', 141 - - , � 011�. - I I . ,,, __ I pl.. , T� , - - � "I A-, V -1� _ - , . V a jdjjr,Ar,� 1 4; � ,,, - I � � I . .� . I � I , � :� 1� I C "," �:l I'l ;, �, � �4. I �� 11Z, � I I �Yll , .. . I :1 . . � . ,. 11 � I k 1�1 �,� A��, 41 i & o I . - I I I I I 11 ,� - " , �� , , `i`wk, i, , : I I I "; e - - � , lill, I I - " - - I , , � I : � . , I �. �11' - . - - . K_ " � - �4j 14 t, * I I . , , , I � . t�i v la� �-._ . � -_ I * , � �_ I , . -1 � � � F�� a __ j , � 0 .1 I - , III �1111 - 1 4 - " '. 'I , �, ! I �,_--' , - IV I �' � , . � - A I � - ., z -�� " . A . � .�_ ` , . I . I . , " - � � , , �,', p -, 7�'-, , o N, 1: I , , I � rl 1�,� , "a : , I I 1. � , - I - ---- r �F I It - !_ I - , � r I'll ,e, � - c, . , . " - - - I - , � . , . r � I � . I 4, ----C� �� - - I � I C Al � , ., - , � , .L . .1d(" . . I _19 �r . : �`_lll 1, I .1 � I , .5 'A � , .. 11, tnre (', ei. ri : �� - 0 . I - : , . 1, � . ., �� __ 11, - �, I . " _ � / � %- " � , 041= 44 - , , 4, , ' ; " i , �� , , � . C' : , I � "I ", _ . , -o (- I . w � 11 ,�, pr, I __ ,,v, i� I 1 ,, ,�i � , I � r� , . 11 I �� I I - 'IF' "" 11 C , . AC .... I - _ _- :,. � , , In 1: , , , , , i , I f) " I -_ moor-, �"l 1�4?,�, � � I Ad `�) , � " � I 11117- I K__) 'I , �_ 111' I It 1, I , , 11 1 4 - !�, t4'_ " I. � � � 9�,! ii . , I- , , 9tl� 9;. ,_�_ 4 A, - . " - . L , v I . . , ,: - - 4 tr� � -1-4 1 1 1 1 1 . � ,��l �;�. C', _. - ��, 1� , , 1. : 'A, � , 1. I , � � rqv , I 11 F -I r � -4 �. 1--, , . ,,:� f � , I I � �, --, , � . . I , 11 ) 11 . ,r,;. I . I , . I - , 7,� i- _� , 11 � `�-z ., I , .. ll, , . -111, � � I * " ,r' 4' %� � - � -W I � 4 ::�il 1,17v .fiiaw I ";, I � I � _r�i - . - -- 1. I L__� I � M 41, � .717, -, ,cl ___.o r I . , - p 4 1 1 -1 , , _. � " I , I � apil, d '. � jo '1_11�. ji M � ' , I . I , c, . I I ,.:. � I , t r � — � 1� , - ?,�,, - � - . I - 1, f-.,-, (:_r p -I- I �! e C, , - f �, I - �", C. , . I I . I I I- A , w il , . ..,&, a . ; :" I . N � I � r, "',, , " -� . I , � r , 't .; ,�_�, . ') if I �? , - � � , I - - -�,,�� - - 11 ' ,, Z, - -.1 - W, 11 , �� . 11 . , % � �_�_ r� & , , -P " ' I I -1 I .111 a _i, - 41-, .,4 "i �� I I - , 4�, ,t ... r,-- I r - : . 1. I " I " , 1� - -4 1 . '-C., 0. �o , '. , :1 � � I - - - , E . - , , r I �i"�&, ,* ,�.J, I __ ;� I. -,Z. - � - I - , � .. - 11 1,� I I ��__ 1--- AV I ml _I,r__,,, 1__�.l �1, , - " -, �� r . 1�,L_ ,#, �K - : � � -Is -, - - rr;;� - I " , , y . -, .1 1, 'r �(. ' s'. r cz ea r, re c ril & I "j, a 71�1110!4 1, .- -a .. -_._-1-_l 1 Z _ . , � � �� 4 I" 4 I 1111t,�', � , lll�_ -IF � � I I : " " - I C 4 ,*1 I "I �� - I "m �_ � [ rr �,4 - i I � - , I . I � ,__ - . � I . I � I � 11 . I I � I . . 111. I ,� � ".A 1-11 _?r �� I '. � % - 1� - __ � _,,_. � , � . .� -� � ,, 5 _. , - . ��,� - ( 1, -, _�I_M:l - -_ , M ,�, � "I � I � � -�k i I i I T 4 e -, -, P, . I ,z , , , � 't "igm ��. _��__ V;- r . -, _ - " :11 , ", .i --,. L� I., .- .1 1�� ". I I I I . . I ... ; I -, - � ' 41 I � I _1,,, 'r� � � I . -1 .., I -_ I ... � 11 I . I _ . 1� I . . -, . 4 1 . - I 11 1, �l I i I _ I ,�,. � � 1 7, WE"'Al , i:. �� - 1, . . �� . 11 . 4. .:�, , - 1! gv; . �-�. 11, I I � . I , 1, , I - I 11 I , - - _ A , I � �: � . 'O - - i� I .... I ��. ll� . -4 , .- I � \ , �/ 1 4, , ' : , - I ,� . �41 ,�, I. - �� , " � �l � , �7 � - - ___ - �40 1 _ . . . - , � " � � , ., I " �C, I I I _", D 11' � � - - I " , _ r � V � , � , ; �_11'0 I , , jis,o - - � 4 ,� , , -- jfi�A "I � '�' L .... , - . I . . . . - ; c� F 1:. _ . --�. , , .1 m im! , � I � C - ,� I ., . " 4 1 1 --, � !, - __ I , - . , , ; - 4- �- 'A �r� , r . A - . I _ _ ��,, I Ir- - I": , � - , , � � I - . , '' . , - ,� I ., _' .. I P, , - � li�ill 4, 11 j , . I 0 I- � A � � - I I " I I I S - r �, � - ,�,� . �%,, 'i ��,,� 41?1 _�� - ------- - - ___ ________ , � --,, -- -- . � ` �� * I _1� 11 , I. ` 1, -- . tw. . , 14' � ��,% I ..". I : ., - I - . " � , . I . I ., � , J, I � .11 ;. *�- -A-, ; � i I . . , - � . , � , k� I I Y'.'a � -2 ,;.J - , � � . I ., . , . , , . ... ". ::� - i;, . �.- ,:,: � -, � " '' I' 1, "", , I, , � � .. ... I - � I ..... _ ,,,,:,,r. �. , . , - cl, , , 2 . � I . � ,�.: " - I � _�7 1, el _;)V I. '! I ll! I , -, 1� i , �. A �Mu . .��j . 3j, ,e I k , . I . i , , I ll F .. I ) : "'i, ,L,, �� - 1p�z r ' . . t I ,,�_ Al 4115A_,,1*2��,.; - � � . . � - - I I-. --- - 1. I.— - - - - - " - . 1-1, - . I , i 11 ;L� �.", I 'I, - , .- , - r. .1 % � I . - .. � I . 1, 11 I . I . �.. I ��, _. � : , -�,-,��k�ar�,'-41'�4_ - - � - - 11 - __ %1.14T, �-r. -- - A, . �17 ', I ; - ., 1�11: IC 1;, � _. � 1.� - � I I . , ��,��.__ _7--:-.--- ", � , I - ".. . � . . .. - - - . - . - - — — � - I , 1 . 11 I I I k - - , , , - - I I . . I , - _�:. - �', _� " i4�' � -4 .--""-' � �� _` ��' -Z�,'_ �- "�'rl- I , , , � I . . I . �l I i - - I I I I I I I . 1. _ �' � - . -1 - . � , . . . r _ _ _ � , ' , : � 7 �. - , _ � , . � 1. � ,� : ;v,;��. . � �� , 5T ll�` , J, � - - .� I I .� , 4��-!�� : " ��;,_,.- " � , . AP' ' I 11 IW - — � .'' .. L . . , . ,-1 , , , . ;,;:j,:;=-,�--_% �,� , -�,_�-�-;Cz ;-A�o;t ;, �.�_, � � � I � �� , , , � ,� , L��,- 'L, "I , 1. � -01 L . , , - C I '. - , r. pr % , � . - - I 1-1 '. , �-, _� -�r ______ I ---.--I'-- — — �l I , '. — " I . I , % . _ � ��. ,;;� , :� , I 11 , ". �� , , , I � - � . r.- ., _ I - I I I . � I I ..l.. . . 777:� ;-"-' k- . , I le - -, - , I--- I �� . -.�2-.-...-;"r-�,-�-,...�.��.,�---�-L,.f�-.,.;.,'..�-"�,',�,'�l, - . 1. . , I -_ - � '_1 I . � I - __ - %;- ,,;: � _1� , - �pz - . - --l. �171�1 _;i.' _:�- � . - I . r 1p - - - , I 1�-- . ,�,:,� __ __ � -, � - � I I _. ill I � 0 1 , ::I� a dh I . � I , I -1 _- �L �- LL , -;-,�T__�_ 'I- -,t- __ `iz:; , CS. . , ": " . , -F"- , - . . I I 1 " - 4� . � I I , . � �11; 11-i _1�1 � m ,,�� . �, -__,r_-- - ,;�,;,_ _� � � ..,.k,,r �-_� I I I I - ,-,- .- � C �_ . I I;w 4;C,�� -" , I I , - _ r I I � 1. - � I - z I . I . . :i�_ --;�� - -.4 11 ,"; I 1�� -. _) � , � . .. I- 11 - . � 1. . . 17 r. ", ,, � , - - ;, .. I I � - I � , - , -, r . r _ , , , r - � I - , , : - - . ,, #0 , � - .. I I . .� , _ _. _, __, . __ . . - _ __ , - .� - - �l _ , , I � 117, -1 I I - _ , _ _�. __ -;Li- � -. C ,,,�,,: 11 I 1�' .. - , , �� _, t�� 11. , ________._,_ :.,_�-�"l,_,:-,' �,,:"��_ --�;,; .i.-,. - --.C�-�,.�C "�,;'_'17L�l__-,: �,:�" -1_1 ..; � . � ': v v L� - - I , , , - , - I I � 1. . � 11 ., -, _ I I - - ,- -, - _ , , , I � __ �� - __ _; �, � ,_-;, - - 3�__ : , ;v, , ., p) " ,�� . . - f I . . I , , .1 I � - . - ' � L '' '. � �, �, .�zi_ �� _ , � I ' - , ------- - , - . .1 . � . I C - r T '. '. . j - , . - 11 � - I I - , -l-____ _; - --.1111 - ._11� - � � .. - . I , - I I . , I _ , , � �'. 1. I - . . � Z, , - , , r . , -J 'V __,,�__,�_,�_' i C -z _',��W-,: ;�-�.�:_�,. , _-4--ow I . i I � I- � 0 1 , I O I I - - . , _1� r . . . . 11. .. _7 , _�� ; �,_�'Z;,' - - W, ��___:. I I "t, 0 F,�., , ,,,r, , . I 2 . . , ., .., 7 . 11 � . _ r I :_1 _�_ r�14�_ I I , , , A. a I .--- -_ - - � - 11 I � _-____ . - - � .- .... " -"-- '. , I ,;.�,:-.��,',#P-L��.,l cl - I - I .- --- � - -- � _� . I �� , t�_`� ' ' '".. I . I . - , ;�,,�r -, '_ , _1 , ''. _r- , ,". � � .: t.- I I � .J. 1, � 7 - : � 2 .-I. I - - . I %Y I . . . 1� . -L §, � . I " - , . , . , .- � , , � ,'-- I 1� I 11-1. ,. I "'. � - . � �,.A�� __� � C;x � - - � ", � � It- � - - .��:, --C _ - I - �', _z_ - ��;�i ,_Z--.l�_,l;�,.'_ _-O-� -, '_':-,--�_;47- .,.�,:, _,_�;�_ -,.,A ) �:�_ - � ,�_�� I . � �? __-1 -w—, _� _,�,_� - ,'_�,. � , - , �� _ C".. -, I _ -, - I I I :., , � - _:, � ': � , '��. 11, � .. .-l- -11 F��,r,�� I 1, , - _ r �.11 �'� � � " - ' � _ - ,� , � ,,--- --' I � U- - R V - - - r � - . � r � - , - , � , __ : : � :� �� - I -.1 -�', - - " " . 1: - � ', j, ,,, �. . ,,, , r I o I I 1. r , 7 r .... 7 _ ,- ,x.� , mC , .; , � �,__ ... . . . - , I I I � ig;--z;�,,_� ."'ro I __ ... I - C :%� ikq 11 . . I � . . I I I . . - I � I .1: . " � , , . " ", : I " � . I I � . I . , . - � � _�� k�_:,;� - - ". - " - � . - -.1. -.- ... _. � I � ._ I _ _�___ - I I ,,�',. , " � - � � 1. , � r I 0 1 �__ I I I IV . - I �� I .I ;74W -, -: � _ li,Z . �:_'l I 11 - I - I - . � ,r . . - - �- " -4 t- ,r,r - , , I I . __ _�� - � � . � - , � � . - ,�;- ,,, -, - L �,. -_��%-��.�-�,i.,. V Ai, � ir t , : If �,,� ;zo��, :, ., �;;:,4t, - � . ". : . - - ,.", . - - - I 11 0 _ , . - � - � �r _ . I � - �'� -, ____1_11;�_;:_-A [1-1 tj f�p. �" - - ; - .i .1 .- Ir - � , r - . ". I � _ :L , � I - . , I r . "� _ � . - 11 .- , -711--1 _:_. - � ,,r ,;,�� " __ - --_�_ ""' -, . ��i_:,.%- , I 1.1,11 _ �- I 1� . ;� - .. r',�;l �� I . . - � i �L ,,� - � , __ 11 - "�.j �'r I � - I - I I I � . ' � � r r , , , L . . liwk � ,�, rt�, , , - --- I - ,. .- 4 �� . , �, r . I - � � __ I I , I � . I I .1 I . - . .1 �l , i . � � , 13", - I . - ,:,, .-r,-:'.' L - , , -, , ��:,;:� j ---- -- � - �__ 1. - � , . � . ,� ,.�, .1 I I'll . , � .� 1'�� I I �'. I .. . � . I , , , � � � I � I I � - 6' � I , 1: .�, m 4__ k- -1 � � . , - I ". - I --r ,, �, ,'�', , r __ _ - .r r , , I . ., - , � � . � , " . . . . . . . . . . 4 . -P1 :1 , � - I I . I . - �.__ � 4- r , -�j�___;'.� - .,� _, ..." r _��, _,�,�__ ,'A, � .., - I I - .1, ,-, I - � �� , I . I _. , , %2 � � � �� - . , 11 I I _� I . , - ,�� - __ V � . , . , . . , - I - .- I T I _ - , -, � . 1-1 - , - � � � , - � i-- r: � , . . , , _ , , �., �L- � - , , --- - - I � , � I __ 11 - 11 I- �;��': I -, I . , I , tE � (:�,, �, � � , . . .1., _,_ ,. , _. ;� _, _� , � " � ::",�, ,_:� . , . `,',��_ :--u ��,:--` �? � _��- ��' � ,,� 7 L7- d" I � -7 - , I . W � - 1 4:gl ' ___ - r , , ' L' I I � . I I— � , .. �_ ,,,..;, - ,_ � �__ ,�. .__ - ._____- - �: , , '.__.� � 11 , _j 1:.1 or_� . �- � - I- I r . - . _. � - . ; 1- I . I - I- I I - - -1 .1 -, --.,. - - , I I , " . - - I " - _?�; . 0 - I.:, - ZL� I - I I I - I � , . �_:; - _L� __�_-,.�� " -- ��_,Crl _��_'17__'-�-_f__�-_�;"4, ._,_,Lt,;. , .. ',��ZZ;4�� __� . . , - , : ,` -`, - q I - ,-' (4) L I - _�," I I � - - - - - � . � � � ., ,_ ,_;� , L - 1- _� � �. " _ ' " 7'- - �'L _ .' , . ___ .. . , , �7,., - , . �_l -1 7 10 , -�_ , el . 1; . . I . -,,C I r _j � � , - �� I AL - 1111 I __ I F � " - �,, - - &.� I I .- � C _ _, .;: ��, * 'f- 'Z,17 'A . � � 1, _ . , ,- L - I 1. , - A I - , : 1:1, -- ---- r ,, _ , ,_,,,, ,,,,,_ _A _ _j , . , , :, '" " . � ) - 1-1 I . le� - , I I - I I � " - ' _� I . r . ., - . . " - 11 -1 � I ' " __ ' - ' -11 I'll - -1 ____�� ,-. _� _ __ �, . I ,�,� � lll_�_ - - , I ';A , I . . , I T . - - I � I � I - . . - � . , 4'. A .. :�;�r,: - - ` � --�, ;, _- __i_ . _ , 71 i�:��Z�J�r- "77� � �`,�'= - . �l - I �� " � 1.111. 1 '7 ,.�� : �� , '. , I � t - - -.1 - A-$ W, � � L �,,r �. _ , , , , � . � -, _ - , . _ , .;, ,�-__ - ,�"o:_-:�,_', p , �� __ __ �_ , �,r Z� I I I,_ I I . . I I � _ -�,� , r_ ;�� , I , "I I , . _-w, , � _ , , , � . I . I _: r �. ,�_, - � - , - 1. . , . I - - _ , . '. ��_ . k, . , 2-: I 0 1 441160 - , I �� " , -I I.- _..,, ,,.rl -1 , _ - � , ' I . 1. .- ,� _�� - - � '. . - - . - - b�,�, I I . . , � - '!"' , _ , _,� ___ , _,_ . . ,�__.W.' - - , 1�;�,-, p, 1, '_,:�' . , . :�-._ - � _�,, , ; - - 4� 1 1_�,�L, - - -I, -, _ � .1 ,'_ I .. .11 � �:__ ., . � I *_' I , , L_ - - . �. . . , r . r � , I I ' � -- - � - "r r _,. I � � � , _ _ , r . � , I . .�� , - - - I � , w - �� " I - . . - � - . . I . --- i-.-.�--,-�,�;4il��,;�i,""-,�,�t--'iL- , ': --,-. � �,�.' . - - 7, : -,, � " �.O�,, : ., - - � iL , I Q - - I __ 5r7 ,� - - .F'l-1, �� - IS - _r ". I � . 1. " � %� ,:, I I I I , I _. � . 11 -1 ' -1 . I - . - -1 --r. L _. � ,, ;-11-'r-', . _ , %z - . -' � I - . . -, I � I � I I --- rr -I - I : L,.- � - , 't L I U , I . _ � � �� _ , , ""r , - " " . � .7 1. ,:�� _, ' - �-�'-I -'-. �i- ., �- - , : � � ��_ I "Y "'��' ` - �, . I ,%� . O I . - li , � (b I � .1 I I I - I �., � r ...... _ , �. � .1 � - �:_ ": I., O - - I I , T , _Z:_ � , - .. .. kX11. - kk I : I I - , � � .1 , , - - - _-, . I --r-, I— - � : - L. I - I - - f�� ,� .. - , - - _' ' , :,2 1 1, -,3'%-_ �, 12� �. ,� - _.: O l?Ai!-" �Lt_ I - -9 . - a - - f�, I I - . - . - 1. � . I � r... ,. 1. .. ��... I I I _.; _ - .1- . :..-- .1 __., _ - .1, - - -� �.� .W-,,-.-- :��. - �C, ,�,_�r� - ,,-",_�,-,.-,:,C%, �, _�_:��, ,�-,,;C��_-__ r,:4 '_C.._l--. ,,, �,Q�;o�i� 1�1 , - t�-_ k*,- R I O '.i.F - ' " _",�r - - 'r, - � _ . I L '' I , 4 4 M � _ , - . ,� r 1. ,; '" �,�;��i�� _ m, 4 . 1, ,' , _77 - - 11 " , J",4 , -, - � .' ' _� L - - , -, -�a � _ "L I '!� � ill �--�-,,:!�� i.;-,_.-.._. : � �y i,v � .1 z I _;_�'. j '11--�;_�`,"l, . 1; � I I -, � _';� � ':�4 t 7' - 77 - � . I . I I - I . I �l � I " " _r -, - " .--r �1 w 1-. , . I 1. - �, _ CCC;� � C-7. - � .';z --w ... ��Z��-,;,z_ � , _� " , I - I - _., � , 11 . �.,Z_)t I ;T � ", , . __ : O . . , 11 L _� _:�7 t . I . . . � - �, ,� I 1. - I I �'; � , - � I -.1 I I I . _ - I _ � '_ - . .1 I I .. - �l - , _�,*!� , �� I 1. , - - , t, _ � __ - - . � �, r, ,,_. I r '_ ': : " _�� . I �. I � I � � � . � � _: '__ _ , I r'r ,� : 7 _;.-I , , I - . , - - - - - r, ,_ ___7 _ _ _ r . r. � �,,�:: - � ��:_. , I - - L, , , I I , - ,r, i I . � � I I ;;4�7.::; __ - -_ - -1, F� I I .1 --.;---r,��`,Z-`xCTg, - - - � � . � ,AMM6— ' 1, �'_ � I I - - _ � - � - - , .. -1 I .1 I I . ., .I . � � r . , (611 � .. 4 - , , - . : - , . . � : , � , _, , - , IM r, 1. C', 1. . � � " . - - , , �. t X or I r. � b L . � �,.Z_:,,�."'_'_ � C� :�:��%, , , " 1 "., - -,. ,", ., W. -, >r- ::� , "I", M � ::-, ",r- - ____,_,__ -,'- ,', ',�� - '. ,� , _ _ 11 � 11 " "", - " " , , ", , , � I I - - : : - I 11 �, " ' " - � - - . - . 11 - - 1-r-, � 4.., - " _ � I _ _,. � _ , , .. ,;._ ., _ _ , F �3� __7_ ; . 0 Aq, , , .. , I � � . I � . . . I � r- I I I .1 1. I . - . . . , __ � � -�4 -" -� ;;�, -�,_V,;,�-, �,_'�4,-, , - .. ,� - , O" � �-, - I . � : - , , � - _ -L, , , w I -,w I 11 . - , I , � - I . i_ ,; '- I .__ . I . � � I .w 1. .. I I - . �C%�� - - I �_r � .��,,�� _ _��. ,;C� �_ �_ �, I � -1 . � , IP �, ,% - , w t* , ��i � I 1. , . I r _ , . - .- I - - I— -1 _. --.-" - -1 - : � r. , � ... I , . 1 . - " . , " , ,_ , , , � . , . , __ - I . I- . ; 11, L� - - . - � .", ," - , . __ ,, r . -, , - , , . �� I I I _ t I . , . _71- . - � I , C , �� I � , - , , -:, - � I , I _r , , , , - �, � I - . I . . I 11. I.. ' , � � " r- I - - I � _. r.1 _ _ I _'. _�_ ;1; - __ - - , �_ , __. ,�! � � :. . I . . � �� I � , , - I- I 'r , k: , < , _ __ I., _. I - _;.,,._ ,--. - ,; - .1 , . - 1. � ,,: �:% __ - � L_"dt'�FTMS::� J:,7��,z � Z,.., , �11` 1-,,�,--A�-e: � ir' � ' � ��1111`1 , " �� 5 (111.1 77: 1 , I I - . - .1 - 'T �:� - , ( � �. . .- L � ;'�_'� --,-ll-- �_. .r- �__- _,� _, - ... - . ��;, . . - - . �, � , " , , , , .C, .��, ;_-�::::� , ,� 2,�._ C�;,--"� z. -7 , , . ,� , , ., , : , Qgs 6 . . I" , I � 1.11 -Il-,�-��-�",��-�-�--�z;��;��;�-�------,� - , __ . , 1_ , _S . � "', j _,, , - I . � r - ' - :( I . � K, -, I - �p n. . - . - ��:�g�.l " I 1F, . 11 . 111'r _,� __ I , 'i " " - . . . . - �t 1 ----r,-!C4r4 . �-- - . ---- , - w - �_..,.� � � K4 1 r- - r - ".. ., r � . I I . ., _. I I I . I . I �� - , , I I - .., , — , _J7 I I -1 , r . I I - ------- I----- -4, , ,_ _. .., �l , (12 � O ,��4�- ___ - � . r __.- - _... - , - � ", . . , - . - 11, I- . , � I �� , !;� ( , , , I ". -- 7", �.. --*.o I G - * I - I I%- , I I w . , - ... . - - , =__4ttg�_ I , - 'AM . - �C� I ,�, . �r � : : , ,�.,. r I I ,.I . - i 11, . . . . . . - � , 1, . . � % , ,� � - I � ( � : -_� L L . 11 - I I " Ir- � / � p � ." I .mm.. - - _______ ___ ____ � _. - r o , � _� �;;; ,,, � .- , � , _ � 1'1� I I I � - - - V 11 "I I _1.illl'_ ,�:, I -, ,� ,-��, - - - . . 'j,r* = , - __ ��,11,411,:��s � � , � � . . __ I I � A - - ____,____,ff=,___ - - , , . . - . . .�.: ��:_:_ ,_'�,�� ...... ,": -� _... "�';� , - ' .r -, �, - � � " , ; � . - - , _ - , r . 1.) -, 11 _____lw_,w__ __ 1� , � - , L ) I ,; . . .. - I � - I - It 'c� , f, - � �k 1� v/ 0) � 11 . _--i ; . � el') � - - - ___ - '. �_, ,� � I .... � r, � - - � I I � - I - � I I � .. -...---- _____ _____ -, !� , -u�,- .- A��-_-. , , ,W�Zt� - __ , .- . I . _,F__� , _� � _____ t � - _ _ �_A74p�`Wmllw:._, - - __ ,pl , sm, I - "'-A-w- . r. 'A , I I ,_A�� -- - . , - , ,RL_ - � - __r -o I � , _,lil� _ I , - ? _L__ _:m -1--1__-l._- f4lzm-9 - AM I - - � - . . k,7L�,___ , I " 1.1-1 �O - Ir , �__ - , - , � � 7 - - - & 41404010* ,��, _ ,- — a;Zi 1-1 41.01111L__��_ __ .. I I �, , ., - I momr u"C,� , I _� In.- --a AEll F_MW4��_ ZZ, .----- --- I - L I - ___ . . - 1�4� _. . , - : -t=-:,-C�vQT ,.4zz==_llllrljF" &A��, -�, 1'� I � i . Wffll�_ 4��--�--.�.�=��z,-L---�-,��--��:�-.;,.,.. , �, 'L 1� - --,- _ _- _zmAm . - . jo"_ L -, - - , :�_, ".., - - - . __ __-- -"!Ma--,-p i; I . 1-1: I � . -fiifti.j&d-� w,',,4_.._�6 - _ r �'p � . �� %,�� . . . I � -1 __ W_lw&J ,;� - � , .-_�ffl .. . . . 1 . --- - F,'r _,jW - __ - 4;��:�- ,�;.�- 1.',.`� _,��A�- 1= I I - r'. �.��ii�" .- I _'� A A � - . _11 � ; __ - I I I . , / 17� 7, -1 � iC � .. ---. , 11 v . - - i � - . - , - 11 _Bb I I _�� 11 � _11W11- " I,- - - - I - I - - � � - 11 jWAF , , . - ,WF- r'f .- , jjblL,-_ r -e',, , a I TOOMMISM �� i I � -M � 11 I - _�_, - . uw �,�-,.,!,,. A_� _. 7, " — - , ;4,�� __ I � Jplfr�� . - -Aw-NRNP AVRPJM� AV .' . _ZR� , . , ,AF M�� 7 1 . - _ . - _� r , i � ; " "I = , t" �l -, - , Aff'. .1 . -� - — --------------- :2-�- , IL . �L - , - " - - 1�-, �: , - I I - - I I . jjjf�,__ . �. - � _ .... � , - -� = wi ;)P _': �;� - ' _. - ,_ �& . —I-, - L ,c — -- - —, - �_ , -1 I 11 . � I � I -1 11 - I i I - - __ __ . . ---. - - _.- , " - - . I iw - v , ,;C, 'A�m I., -A iWl WO ___ ---.-- ,, - - - . 0 1 1 .1 . - -,-- I - = - - , - : . A!r_l_lll,�_M - -1 . I - _...., - ", - 2 _________,_ - - - - - - - - - - ...___�� ______ � . ,� . I - , - I . - r --- �,� - . I q . .,a -11 :7�� - I - � - � , , , 11 - k7 = 7 '�_iil �l I -1, , W- - - - __ '% "I � ..F- . - __r , , ;_ , --- - - ___ - .- ,. , - -,-�, - ,7_7 -Ir-� - - — . - " 1-160 .1: r I - , � . -7%-- - - _MZ__l_.__G__l1) I I , �. — 4v - � - _,___. -1 , ____ -.-.-, —, - - a , - ;-- ___��P _�_ - - . .! - I rr 7.- 17 ---- �',�,�.'_',L�,_--71.. �l . -,�", , 7 - . .- - ., - - - ."ll.'.1 -7----7- - �7 - I ,z 4 1 1 1 1 , , I : - , *1 __ - -, ,C� , . - - .-I--- - 7 .1 -a -ft - - - ��;r*- � i � . - . r I I ,If! , , , ., : L . __�Wll` I ff I . L�� : , � r. , , � . - 11 �l I., ll� I w I , ' � - , . � , � , � 1-1- , " . , , I -------- � 'k C � � � r I 11 I , . � . r r . . ,� � ��:l 1� . I I � � .... � . � . - 11 � I I � I " - , I *z� I � . 1, rr' - . . � I - � _, . , � .. 1. -, - . r , - , I .; � I I I , , . I 1 1 c .17 r 1 -1.11!47 11V - -� � � _ _ - . I , V , .10 I I I - - in 11 .-;, , '�r 11 - V_ �', .". ,� I U Cl Cl " , r 8�1_ I I - I I . �� 1.11 � , IP ! � L��. : , I I Ir . 11 . . . . . � I li I I� 'a I �- - a - . ? � �?' f� , . , I I _' � liV I , . --- ` -, �_ - , � .. �� _. 1611., � ; I I - -�_,, L � I � . � ..'r , .�, . I . I I— a, � L . '. � ,,,,, � ,_ "I - L - . I ,_ I M, �l � 1, _W�� I It I ': , , . -, . I - I ��__ . � I I , , . I - . � I . 7 1 , I , '� - , __ . F�,--� ,)�',T\ � Ir i , 7,x., , _WC . /F#* - I . I . I I , L � wil I �l , "�� ,_ " flh I' I, 1 ,1� �, , 4g"�.4 114, �_ - I "I - , 1 4W - I I . . I I , tr . �l , � 11 .. . 1, 11 I I W, I -, , r I , . , " , , " " (w -ril I Gi 14" - - � '� I C.4 P L � � I I . .- - � -1 -i T I . I I - r , r _ I - I Ir � 1_ t, 1. � I I . - - 1 . : . 4 , � - , 11 _�l I �- 't : , I - " � I f- VI � I �._l , ir - I . . � . , � I '' ',�, .� I I .1 , " i, '1�1 - 1. , , . , �: - klC�` - � -; �. ltbl! .1 : . . I . 11 � ___,��_ --- - . 7-P. r v ll?�l - ` 0 1 ff.12 V, , , . � 'r .f I ._ - - I I - " �N, , , - I I- I : �%_ ::, ",:L ,_ IL - " , . 11 C . . . I - I -11 I 3-L , ,� . ..nl '' I I 1 4 . �, ��, 41 . � . �� I b IX � ! J""v� , . . I r .1 I -1 - .. . . . I I � � - -1 i.�, -11-11, I , I - . -r", . .. 4 _1_ I ,�; .- � � I I � � . W `11 'VI � . _� I � � . ,I . 9 64 _ � .1 11" I r 14 1 *;_ I '. , - -_ i , 4 Y-,�', � - I I I - . 'I � -ap 11, . I I . r '. 1�� o4j, �� .1 �l I � 1: , - -m----, . , , , ". :�4 , , , -� ,;W- ! �-,,�`�,:_,,,_,_, , - -4 , C i __ , � _q __ .1 - I -��, . I ;'.. � __ r . I : .. I � _ I I C, _%?,�',�� I ;: � I � " .O_k�� I I I - F �l 11 C i r ��"' . . . �Tu� �, - -P 11 , V , , � � " FF .. , ' I I � I , , r � 11 � 14" , ,4 , - .1 r L I - � I - - - *- , " � . , � r !e )v � ,,, jr; __;-_ , ll� _*� - I __ " " ,� 4_1� " - Z_ ) 1� : ,�� , I 1 - "_-� *_ ' q I I , - � k Q , l � I Jr, �'[ - 7 �r - ...". , . - � I � C' -4 �7�11 � L t-_ _�� I � � - -1 -1 .- 1� -,�T . . - o� ___ 7 _., V �,w� * W,;,�� .,�!.�-_- -,;_ , C, Al, �k - 2_ - ."_ 47 .. I ",:I ; . I � i � I O� 11 - - ' . . : It , . _. ,,-, ) " . I . I - � ��, 3, � � _ - � � I . V� � � 11 i __ I � - i : I I T-�l � C__C � - , .- �� , I : �. A�.;� I . I #I . �,� 'If I I � � 1. I I _� � . .. I % .. I . . , __ " . � I : _� . _.. . � I � . �l I . I . ,� . I ;. -1, I* , F , ,, " I , . . I . , - I I ; -717 . -, , �11� - "_ . , . , I I I . .- �, , ,, % � , � v I . . .1 , � C� _,�- , �_ " , , . - r " I , � � . , _,, - - __ , - *_ - . I . I �l _ "O 1; 7 � . , -Ir" I - -zj F4 - . - � - - 11 I I . � I , 11 : I . . . v i � �, 1. .1 - ", �, . . -1 - [ ,; , -16 - -i � - li - J. � � ,� _-, , -, ,,� � 7� - 11 _ I 7% Al i!: � . _�, ,� ��l 1, 11 k-1 1--li'l-i , � '��, [ � s ri d, (3. r �:_ r; ri C r; m, .0 � e4 I � . , , Ns" V . 1, �; ,� 4 " -�' '-W_ I ..'�� ,%�� . - . I _ , * elp ` , - , I � /�� 'r " ' : �1-q A., "'..'r", . , , " . � -, , - I I I . � -1 ,� ,;�� I I , k " , W.,,miw, , - Z - .� C i�� 1; - - " " il � , I . I liowl . . I � , , , -, 1, :�� , _ - 4. --;I- I �11 ,,,� � _� i 4 �� r .4 Ill, I- _. , , Q � � r " � . -, !, �X, , , , , " , � 11 I 1� I - � - MR, 1; , �l ,. � .. 1 ,7 1 1 . . . '. � I � - ^1 .__ __ ..___ _" 1" �. $ 1,i "-I-- . _ w r��'�..�.. ,-' , I -1 , � . -A i 4-1 A � . , fj , . � � I I " - % ,,, ej, . � . I - __ - � �4 .- � . �! . I . I I r- - - -1 __ , I ---- �, - 1 C,7_ ," - '. 11 . I - '' � . �� . I . , � , I - � , 1, � I% . I I .r. � I . " � . I . . V � __ , ' ' .,�4_ , . I I ,�� I . I , I ; 1� ,' . 'I I , - # IN - tl yu , Pw , . . . �� I I � �: - . I �. - � . - � ��r � i , . ,� ,� , t I , , i - I ." \ _r , � ', �. , ��j , , , � , , '". : a� , .C, . ----7;- " - , I , : , ': 1, " '. , � - ,,- 1, "" : W, I t , '� - � , - -, , , I I i ,� � 1: , � I - . I I I � . . . . . . . - . I :� .,�.'4 z`� % - - i� . , ", � I I I I 11 - � �v ; __ -1 , I , � , I . � ,,., , . : � r , � . . r ;; � I I ` , ., . I .1 I ' I ��, .1 A / I I . : � � , �v ;a, 1� I . I I . �� - - AO_,"-C'.WMWWMMMMlMMMMWWMWKM=' � I 11 - - 1. ,., - �- 1� - __ � I __ r , � i�� I . I � I �- " 11. I ;, , r: 1;� . � - I - � le IN I . I _:J ? � & JL�. .� _ r �� " I 1� - J� I 'Co. I �� , ,�., , : . - � . . . 1; - AQ14;', , , ,�A ac� I , *0 I . _ - 'r I' �,��, � I I I 1 7: � __ �Xm 34,_, WO - Alm OIL pi Aill F Al-) zdvgll, 4P I I- rw- %- I -j - -,4 -�Fr-(-,r r id (7 pp. X, 1 up 17, Ag, oil I j,;Vj ow Ell" -4c- - - - - - - - - - 01 4 ......... 7�_ mom - Jig. ww� --mummi 4L T", A -J 'TN, i IY " r��r, ;L- .0 ;if hi �i-- A is ftl l, ii� 1 0 14 " L_ t -,i f 0— To Mw -'T AM.* -im Ama J -71 All. F LZ e,r (1 e� r f:- r 1W - I IF up 17A U11, NBC-= -7 -7.7 "N Ali 441 lw: f li,� Jw mm 5a �, 77 _`,)�` AA. 16li- "f, 7,jr7'r foolff- , _mq�_ R h F 0 �77711 7`47 A0. jl� SO '7 44@�_ 1, 0 VIM - RM" Z l� iVyl j '4i 'A LEGEND: EXISTING R/W ULTIMATE PROPOSED R/W INTERIM PROPOSED R/W GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED R/W (ALTERNATIVE 1) PROPERTY LINE CITY/COUNTY LIMITS !� SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION • TYPICAL CROSS SECTION A ANGLE POINT O J W m UjW CD Z J 2 U F-4 ►1 ULTIMATE HARNEY LANE IMPROVEMENTS INTERIM HARNEY LANE IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET/ HARNEY LANE INTERSECTION LEGEND: — R/W 0' R/W Existing Road SOUTH STOCKTON 15' 8' J 12' J 12' J 16' J 12' J 12' J 8' J 15' ------- Future Road STREET EXISTING R/W r; �5' IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS - 5' IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS - 7' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS - 7' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS 8'-14' 1 12 104'-109' 12' I 16' I 12' 12' I 8' R/W 15-16' - 5' IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS - 7' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS EXISTING R/W R/W 113' 8' 8' 12' 12' 4' J 12' LEFT TURN , 12' 12' 4' J 14' LEFT TURN 5' ULIH_rILU JI UL VVHLII 5' IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS 7' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS PROPOSED TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS (LOOKING EAST) EXISTING R/W 104' 8' 8' 12' 12' 4' ]12' LEFT TURN] 12' 12' 8' J 16' EXISTING R/W 5' IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS 7' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS PROPOSED TYPICAL CROSS I SECTIONS INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS (LOOKING EAST) 01.-g mW N aN < LL.a OW 2 oza o JFN U 0aac ' U a N 00 N UPRR W o ca w U� Banyan Drive SOUTH MILLS AVENUE Future Road SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET Winchester Drive SQ U _ m _ Future Road SOUTH HAM LANE 0 U 0 W _SOUTH HAV LANE Legacy Way EXTENSION W.I.D. CANAL z r� W Future W z –Road TT Poppy Drive Future Road w LT c� Crown Place 01.-g mW N aN < LL.a OW 2 oza o JFN U 0aac ' U a N 00 N o SOUTH VIL_L_S AVENUE SOUTH MILLS AVENUE EXTENSION m m Z D W J SQ U 0 U 0 W Legacy Way z W Future W –Road w ~ UO U LL_ z z LOWER SACRAMENTO z U ROAD z �,� a- F Springer Lane(� LLJZ z 2 o Extension Road zw 0 WESTGATE DRIVE Q (n D � z z > W z Q z W � � U� Q z LEGEND: EXISTING R/W ULTIMATE PROPOSED R/W INTERIM PROPOSED R/W GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED R/W (ALTERNATIVE 1) PROPERTY LINE CITY/COUNTY LIMITS !� SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION • TYPICAL CROSS SECTION A ANGLE POINT ULTIMATE HARNEY LANE IMPROVEMENTS INTERIM HARNEY LANE IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH STOCKTON STREET/ HARNEY LANE INTERSECTION EXISTING R/W 96' Minimum 8' Min 8' 12' J 12' J 12' LEFT TURN 4' POCKET 12' 1 12' 1 8' 1 8' M i n R/W C7 EXISTING R/W R 106' Minimum 8' Min j 8' J12' J 12' j 4' J 12' LEFT TURN J 12' J 12' J 4' j 14' RIGHT TURN j 8' POCKET POCKET • PROPOSED TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS (LOOKING EAST) EXISTING R/W 86.5' Minimum 8' Min 8' j 12' J 12' j 4' 12'LEFT TURN 12' POCKET 12" 4' Shldr R/W • PROPOSED TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS (LOOKING EAST) LEGEND: Existing Road SOUTH STOCKTON ------- Future Road STREET Banyan Drive Future Road SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET Winchester Drive m _ Future Road SOUTH HAM LANE _SOUTH HAV__E_ANE EXTENSION W.I.D. CANAL r� Z W Poppy Drive cD Future Road LTu Crown Place SOUTH MILLS AVENUE Legacy LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD 01.-g mW N aN < � a OW 2 oza Oo JFN U Q� UGN OJ a- F- O Springer Lane U� ZLLJ O Extension Road z w W WESTGATE DRIVE Q N ----------- o0 0 N = � I o SOUTH VIL_L_S AVENUE II EXTENSION C2 m z z �owH z S Q U Lv 0 U 0 U W W N z W � W Future_Road LLO 7 (-D LL -1 co U U O LL ~ � W � a- F- O Springer Lane U� ZLLJ O Extension Road z w W WESTGATE DRIVE Q N ----------- Q = z z Lv W = Q = 0 Appendix B Intersection Geometrics LEGEND: Existing Road SOUTH STOCKTON ______________ Future Road STREET R/W EINE ® Signalized Intersection ■intersection Number UPR R Banyan Drive__ Future Road SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET Winchester Drive SOUTH HAM LANE W.I.D. CANAL Future Road SOUTH -HAV -LANE EXTENSION Poppy Driv_ Future Road Crown Place SOUTH MILLS AVENUE h Legacy LOWER SACRAMENTO WESTCATE_DRIVE _ P SOUTH MILLS_ AVENUE EXTENSION Future Road Springer Lane xtension Road r •iiY..S+ y .;;�,. .� •wn•�� ,.:.,a-a?�s.?, s��r..>�' '4� fir `' • - to r : �,.: r�S.`rs-,..::, �,sv�s�,;..�...> � r�..�r•.>_�,+�° ``mss' s�r `u',r"a �Y�i+•r1�:�.,. z +�r*�}`"rte s'r'�S:..j�r"�:�a.� �.�.r�,r, yh.�i,�Y'��r-=•-+.�+g`r`'f •�-.'min-,.e.;.t; �;'4,. r - = y T r tY.izrY' ►''wr'�.p � *. �. 't.r=:r - •. � »'� ,n rA:� _I�r�I Ir- �� I I r - � 4 ,y�; if 7.7 T MM W:44 2 VWZA ° a w a t 3 �..r•ta .wt- .� x -r - +:v: r�'�' wara-�:� �ti_.:i �•+:s'. .. - , , r.C _ u •r�r+-,..:, �,sv��.,.=-..� ".k�,�+ rr-�� v+` '-'�srr� `" � `�',i�a iY+r1�r� '� '' -3�r�-+u�.r"y-•..`�'.1 `moi �„ r„`.�`�`;��3' "` ��, �x.� I�•; ��``i }.� � .wd��.a.�ra. `_'r.*tom is t -t t-°"�.�` w��aa ;,, �%h r 3i• � mow, g.,. J_ � #' - rrA f +t*$,�� x� rte•. �Fw'�•;.�,�ia � Y� a'*rrr�j�.�•ri+�'+:t by rr�m sti,.+� � �tJ • ;: ... _ •r .. r= +Wee'�t.•N`rl�s },.r y+s�39 'g ^'--"4..1I'. ra3r.� .y,•re. .i - ,.�i.•;� ��.,54'`F.� - • a Via+-•' �' "` * ,�-;- ' �.r�r � �r N - � .r ✓ :r a ao-�:r�,`o � _ � - - [bm � 1 yy - _ r 4r '• 7411 yY �■ Ygprer.r - . _. i M1 tw Aon - 1 � Wz —ace.arm sir }iai lip � AF - s f j? r KtIM-6. k �Awauir' js8 07. c 1�'11r CC S rr } r FAW IEWy,WNIWAY i _ r f jAk& mom if J� �• a-ryse S'2F f rr .,r MW f 4 i� ��- i� TiS� i �r *y �..` i�•`^ � �° �—��}l�'!}'E� �1� it f � I f f ,fir' I f7 , "vCf_ —Lai - z ._lie F I + � 1 p, • _ I. 'AMR p I, s 977 W;' Lip All f al i., 'H - ,r w .Rn'+7�I' �{-; 'r`'!+�ii.i'�'vy^rMr+mY°• W 1.++ rk r.... -}F R -:. i , . . .'i 'v- � iii 'fpr �'- � .. V r-+Ijw�-.�w , 41. -.r•cn..;��'' �, � �'C�'.� r.a�e'�s+r�^r�.� wqy�. ,�, t'iS" •rte W i*J°i+. iy'W - � a .,w 7a+[1,^i.+ � +'r'r[°�s^'yr ^R:y+,"aRr �Y"r, ✓5 ...t. -i. ".1-' �f.. y a ^a+ " 'wan '.. tet..] "✓ ..war `d'. �� :. ! . Mr rmi'_ a't P K/` � Y �- I� T �1� ,k '� +� �. F.w++yr+ �k .tx e ��" S �.}'. "i }Fyt3 U T o.`� T' $�'eke;Pf�Jwl9FRif. M'�bi+T h i iF1 *"'�""'x•'!k R +}si � 1{-r—,��F.� �' - rpt. 1 ��Na ar +..+.. +zr4;' •h°RF4W+.aMWA.Rrt, Pi! �..stYi.}lCy� -. ' .. � •• - . 7t#i}Yi `R,-•�+S Pgi�N ei+l wNwl.".t rt�y4 M-� -. :gc'.»+r,iw I r f � i - r - � .. -•tea � AV Al k r ,� ^ j � ►fes , , is -'�� .l_. ahaWiOL Awl Inn � • W Y ti= ,- IL' ti cq y x mw N �• - a. O Q _ + ✓ a OZwz a O a YI YI UGN J E _ m, a .,.. — y4 MEDIAN ISLAND y 1* y (TYPICAL) g DEDICATED RII 4 TURN LANE POCKET I ~ • I � t`" Q s u ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS .." a Q a U Y/ YI.. Llj re �' Ll.I a � — �— sW�, a` 3 _ Y U U O UO r LTJ LLJ F— cl. 0 (n Z F- I : • MEDIAN ISLAND #-1* w O SHARED THRU 8 I (TYPICAL) Z RIGHT TURN LANE I (nW a i r W Of Z u I Z H J I � 4 I Q Z � = LLI Z INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS Q Appendix C Costa and Tsutsumi Exhibits tot .-T "A P. - •i j co CONFORM TO EXISTING; -ft Q NO GRADE SEPARATION A -PED MEDIAN HARNEY LN A RAISED MEDIAN 0'-17' R/W NEEDED EXISTING R/W —TEMPORARILY RELOCATE C; FENCE AND GATE WITH cc TURN OUT LANES a: IMPROVEMENT OF RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT ONLY di INTERSECTION RELOCATE WITH DRIVEWAY ACCESS (TREES TO BE REMOVED) F&L COSTA N 10 Lu cr) END X TING R/W OSED R/W ] '" PR ERTY LINE ALIZED INTERSECTION MEDIAN Ov LA r 4r SECTION A- A in 12 4 12 12 12 4' SHOULDER "ULD Min SECTION A- A LEGEND: ALP* cj) ALTERNATIVE 1 ALIGNMENT SHOWN -A irk It -mm�- A EXISTING R/W a: :j Ir L -u op Ot 40 Jr % or w EXISTING R/W ULTIMAE PROPOSED R/W i _tiq PROPE�TY LINE FAL COSTA -SIALIZED INTERSECTION GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED R/W ALTERNATE 1: OVERHEAD WITH SLOPE ALTERNATE 4: UNDERPASS WITH SHOULDER Min Bike SLOPE (SHIFTED) jSHOULDER Lane 41 SECTION A- A if)MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. CITY OF LODI ftoMmgEwnemag Swmmy and Moning SOVK85 CI It. Z LEGEND: ALP* cj) ALTERNATIVE 1 ALIGNMENT SHOWN -A irk It -mm�- A EXISTING R/W a: :j Ir L -u op Ot 40 Jr % or w EXISTING R/W ULTIMAE PROPOSED R/W i _tiq PROPE�TY LINE FAL COSTA -SIALIZED INTERSECTION GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED R/W ALTERNATE 1: OVERHEAD WITH SLOPE ALTERNATE 4: UNDERPASS WITH SHOULDER Min Bike SLOPE (SHIFTED) jSHOULDER Lane 41 SECTION A- A if)MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. CITY OF LODI ftoMmgEwnemag Swmmy and Moning SOVK85 Z LEGEND: ALP* cj) ALTERNATIVE 1 ALIGNMENT SHOWN -A irk It -mm�- A EXISTING R/W a: :j Ir L -u op Ot 40 Jr % or w EXISTING R/W ULTIMAE PROPOSED R/W i _tiq PROPE�TY LINE FAL COSTA -SIALIZED INTERSECTION GRADE SEPARATION PROPOSED R/W ALTERNATE 1: OVERHEAD WITH SLOPE ALTERNATE 4: UNDERPASS WITH SHOULDER Min Bike SLOPE (SHIFTED) jSHOULDER Lane 41 SECTION A- A if)MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. CITY OF LODI ftoMmgEwnemag Swmmy and Moning SOVK85 HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN - PROPERTY IMPACT APNh. 058-130-24 ; ADDRESS: 120 E. HARNEY LANE PROPERTY OWNER TSUTSUMI MARK THOMAS COMPANY, INC Providing Engineering, Surveying and Planning Services SCALE Y-50' W IC I Co CITY OF LODI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 221 WEST PINE STREET LODI, CALIFORNIA 96240 PHONE (209) S33-6706 HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN - PROPERTY IMPACT APNh. 058-130-24 ; ADDRESS: 120 E. HARNEY LANE PROPERTY OWNER TSUTSUMI *MARK THOMAS COMPANY, INC Providing Engineering, Surveying and Planning Services SCALE: 1"-80' CITY OF LODI DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 221 WEST PINE STREET LODI, CALIFORNIA 96240 PHONE (209) S33-6706 Final Initial Study/ Negative Declaration City of Lodi Harney Lane Specific Plan State Clearinghouse # 2011042033 May 2011 Prepared by the City of Lodi Department of Public Works 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter1- Negative Declaration.................................................................................................1-1 Chpater2 - Introduction.................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 - Purpose of the Final Initial Study............................................................................2-1 2.2 - Environmental Review Process................................................................................2-1 2.3 - Project Description.....................................................................................................2-2 2.4 - Project Location..........................................................................................................2-2 2.5 - Timeline for Project Implementation.......................................................................2-3 Chapter3 - Written Comments and Responses.........................................................................3-1 PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared pursuant to City of Lodi Environmental Guidelines, §§ 1.7 (c), 5.5 PROJECT TITLE: Harney Lane Specific Plan LEAD AGENCY: City of Lodi FILE NUMBER: 11 -ND -01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan involves widening of Harney Lane so as to relieve existing and future traffic congestion at the west -east bound road. Harney Lane currently is a two lane road with a posted speed of 45 mph. North of Harney Lane is mostly new single family residential subdivisions with block walls fronting Harney Lane. Harney Lane has been widened to the ultimate width on the north where the recent development has occurred. The south side is a mixture of agriculture (grapes and cherries) and single family residences. West of Lower Sacramento Road single family residences populate both sides of the road. Between South Hutchins Street and South Stockton Street, Harney Lane crosses the Union Pacific Railroad. The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan mostly affects the south side of Harney Lane. The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan is an integral component of the City's General Plan 2010, which identifies Harney Lane as a four lane express way. The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan details roadway improvements, establish the necessary right-of-way required to accommodate the roadway improvements and it affects a total of 47 privately -owned parcels. Proposed right-of-way acquisitions would occur in conjunction with actual construction projects. No physical improvements or construction activities are proposed in conjunction with implementation of the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Subsequent development in the Plan Area, including all Subdivisions, Site Plan Reviews, Planned Development Review, and Conditional Use Permits will be subject to environmental review on a project -by -project basis. The project design, as illiterate in Exhibit 5, was prepared in accordance with the City framework set out in the General Plan adopted on April 7, 2010. Items considered during the preparation of the Specific Plan include future land use, roadway and bicycle network, right of way issues, safety (pedestrian and vehicular), ingress and egress for residents and businesses and environmental issues. There are no physical improvements or construction activities proposed by the project itself at this time. Final Negative Declaration 1-1 May 2011 PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: The proposed Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30 -day public review period, beginning on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 and ended on Wednesday, May 11, 2011. Copies of the document are available for review at the following locations: • Community Development Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240 • Lodi Public Library, 201 West Locust Street, Lodi, CA 95240 • Public Works Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240 • Online on the City's website: http://www.lodi.gov/comdev/EIRs.html FINDINGS: An initial study (IS) has been prepared to assess the Harney Lane Specific Plan's potential effects on the environment and the significance of those effects. Based on the Initial Study and other pertinent information, , the Harney Lane Specific Plan would not have any significant effects on the environment since no physical improvements or construction activities are proposed in conjunction with implementation of the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Subsequent development in the Plan Area, including all Subdivisions, Site Plan Reviews, Planned Development Review, and Conditional Use Permits will be subject to environmental review on a project -by -project basis. This project will not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. This project will not have environmental impacts which will cause substantial adverse effects upon human beings, either directly or indirectly. This conclusion is supported by the following proposed findings: • The Harney Lane Specific Plan would result in no impacts aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, greenhouse gas emission, geology and soils, minerals resources, population and housing, biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, transportation, and utilities and service systems. • No physical improvements or construction plans are proposed in conjunction with the proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan. Final Negative Declaration 1-2 May 2011 CHAPTER 2 - INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose of the Final Initial Study This document has been prepared to accompany the Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) for the Harney Lane Specific Plan. The Draft IS/ND identified the environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the plan and concluded no physical change to the environment or construction plans are proposed in conjunction with the proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan. The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan details roadway improvements and establish the necessary right-of-way required to accommodate the roadway improvements. Proposed right-of-way acquisitions would occur in conjunction with actual construction projects in the future. All future construction projects, including all Subdivisions, Site Plan Reviews, Planned Development Review, and Conditional Use Permits will be subject to environmental review on a project -by -project basis. No physical improvements or construction activities are proposed in conjunction with implementation of the Harney Lane Specific Plan. The statutes and guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) require the Lead Agency to consult with public agencies having jurisdiction over a proposed project and to provide public and other interested parties with an opportunity to comment on a Draft IS/ND. This document responds to environmental issues raised in the comments on the Draft IS/ MND. 2.2 - Environmental Review Process The Draft IS/ND for the Harney Lane Specific Plan was submitted to the State Clearinghouse (SCH #2011042033) on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 for a 30 -day public and agency review and comment, which ended on Wednesday, May 11, 2011. The Draft IS/ND was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statutes (Public Resources Code [PRC] Sections 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Section 15000 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations). The City of Lodi is the lead agency for CEQA compliance. In accordance with the CEQA Statutes (PRC Section 21092) and Section 15072 of the CEQA Guidelines, public notice of the Draft IS/ND was provided by the City of Lodi through publication of an announcement in the Lodi Sentinel on April 12, 2011. In accordance with Section 15105(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City provided a 30 -day public review period for the Draft IS/ND, commenced on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 and ended on Wednesday, May 11, 2011. The public notice published in the Lodi Sentinel included details on how to obtain copies of the Draft IS/ND. Additional notification methods were also used, including: mailing copies of the Draft IS/ ND to various agencies, posting the Notice of Availability (NOA) at the City's website; and mailing the NOA to property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the Project site. The NOA included information on how to obtain copies of the Draft IS/ND and how to provide comments on the document. Final Negative Declaration 2-1 May 2011 The City received three comment letters on the Draft IS/ND during the 30 -day public and agency comment period. These three comment letters are addressed in Chapter 3 of this document. This Final IS/ND has been prepared to respond to the comments received by the City that address environmental issues related to the Draft IS/ND, in accordance with the CEQA Guidelines. 2.3 Project description The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan involves widening of Harney Lane so as to relieve existing and future traffic congestion at the west -east bound road. Harney Lane currently is a two lane road with a posted speed of 45 mph. North of Harney Lane is mostly new single family residential subdivisions with block walls fronting Harney Lane. Harney Lane has been widened to the ultimate width on the north where the recent development has occurred. The south side is a mixture of agriculture (grapes and cherries) and single family residences. West of Lower Sacramento Road single family residences populate both sides of the road. Between South Hutchins Street and South Stockton Street, Harney Lane crosses the Union Pacific Railroad. The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan mostly affects the south side of Harney Lane. The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan is an integral component of the City's General Plan 2010, which identifies Harney Lane as a four lane express way. The proposed Harney Lane Specific Plan details roadway improvements, establish the necessary right- of-way required to accommodate the roadway improvements and it affects a total of 47 privately -owned parcels. Proposed right-of-way acquisitions would occur in conjunction with actual construction projects. No physical improvements or construction activities are proposed in conjunction with implementation of the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Subsequent development in the Plan Area, including all Subdivisions, Site Plan Reviews, Planned Development Review, and Conditional Use Permits will be subject to environmental review on a project -by -project basis. The project design was prepared in accordance with the City framework set out in the General Plan adopted on April 7, 2010. Items considered during the preparation of the Specific Plan include future land use, roadway and bicycle network, right of way issues, safety (pedestrian and vehicular), ingress and egress for residents and businesses and environmental issues. There are no physical improvements or construction activities proposed by the project itself at this time. 2.4 Project Location The projects limits are located on Harney Lane, between Stockton Street and Lower Sacramento Road in the City of Lodi, in San Joaquin County. Harney Lane, as illustrated in Exhibit 1, is located at the southern edge of the current City limits. Regional access to the project limits is from SR Route 99 via Harney Lane exit. Exhibit 1 shows the project's location from a local and regional context. Final Negative Declaration 2-2 May 2011 2.5 Timeline for Project Implementation The Lodi City Council is expected to make a decision on certifying the ND at its meeting on July 6, 2011. Assuming that the ND is certified, the Harney Lane Specific Plan takes effect Final Negative Declaration 2-3 May 2011 CHAPTER 3 - WRITTEN COMMENTS AND RESPONSES The City received five (5) comment letters on the Draft IS/ND during the public and agency comment period. The following table lists the commenters and the dates of the letters. Each letter and individual comment has been assigned a letter/number designation for cross- referencing. Also included at the end of this chapter is a letter from the State Clearinghouse. The letter acknowledges that the City of Lodi has complied with the State Clearinghouse draft environmental document review requirements, and indicates that one state agency submitted comments through the State Clearinghouse by the close of the comment period on May 11, 2011. All comment letters received are addressed in this Final IS/MND. List of Commenters/Letters Designation Commenter Date of Letter Comment Numbers A California Valley Miwok Tribe Aril 24, 2011 A-1 B San Joaquin Council of Governments SJCOG, Inc. April 25, 2011 B-1, B-21 B-3, B-4, B-5, C Union Pacific Railroad May 13, 2011 C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5 D Department of Transportation (Caltrans District 10) May 13, 2011 D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, D-5, D-6 E State Clearinghouse My 16, 2011 E-1 Final Negative Declaration 3-1 May 2011 Final Negative Declaration 3-2 May 2011 Comment A CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE 10601 N. Escondido Pl., Stockton, CA 95212 Ph: (209) 931.4567 Fax: (209) 931.4333 blo.I/calloniiavulleymiwoktribe-usn.gov �pnllrg d �"j r. •R fr�r��rf-ra1� April 22, 2011 Community Development Dept. C/o City of Lodi City Hall, 221 W. Pine St. P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, California 95241-1910 Re: Mailing Address for the California Valley Miwok Tribe Dear Darcy, RECEIVED APR 2 4 2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT CITY OF LODI I am writing to inform you that the old tribal address of 1163 E. March Lane, Suite D — PMB#812 Stockton CA 95212 is no longer valid. A-1 The Tribe is requesting that you send any future correspondence to the Tribe's physical address: California Valley Miwok Tribe 10601 N. Escondido Pl., Stockton, CA 95212 Feel free to contact the Tribe at (209) 9314567 if you have any questions. Sincerely, r✓ Silvia Burley, Chairperson s. b u r I ey@ californiav—al leymiAPktribe-nsn. ov Attachments: 1 Final Negative Declaration May 2011 3-3 Comment A Final Negative Declaration 3-4 May 2011 Comment B RESPONSE TO COMMENT A Comment Letter A: California Valley Miwok Tribe Response to Comment A-1 Thank you for your input on this important City project. The City will note change of address and will direct future correspondence to your new address. Your comment has been incorporated into your letter into the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration. Final Negative Declaration 3-5 May 2011 Comment B o�'-':CEIV",) APR 25 Poli S ]COG' Inc. r,TY"'�'el"-- _ 555 Sm W6ff Ave - Sncl,wn CA 9M + 0%2M.OM . PAX M" 235,01M San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation & am Spare Plan (S]MSCP) SJMSCP RESPONSE TO LOCAL JURISDICTION (RTL)) ADVISORY AGENCY NOTICE TO S)COG, Inc. Ta KonradfBatram,City ofLA tS+Developrnent Depeftent From¢ Kmbedy Juarez, SJCOG, Inc. DOW. April 18, M11 Local Judadlctlon Project Title: Harney Lane Specific Plan Aaseseor Parcel Numbor(s): Local Julsdlotlon Probd Number: 11 -NMI Total Acres. W be converted Crum Open Space Use: Undetermined Hebltat Types to be Disturbed: Agdculture/Muld-Purpose HaNtat Land Species Impact Plndirsgs: Findings to be determined by $JMSCP biologist. Dear Mr. Barham: SJCOG, Inc. has reviewed the Draft Initial Study/Neg Dec. This includes an Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaradon that involves widening of Hamey Lane so as to r0ave existing and future traffic congestion at the west-ead bound road. Harney Lane currently is a two lane road with a pasted speed of 43 mph. North of Hamey Lane is mostly new single family residential subdivisions wflh plods walls fronting Hamay Lane. Flamay lane has been widened to the ultimate width on the north where the recent davabMem has occurred. The south side is a mbduns of agriculture (grapes and cherries) and single family residences. West of Lower Sacramento Road single family residences populate both sides of the road. Between South Hutchins Street and South Stockton Street, Harney Lane crosses the Union Pacific Railroad. The proposed Hamey lane Specific Plan mostly affects the south aide of Harney Lane. The project limits are located on Hannay Lane, between Stoctdon Street and Lower Sacramento Road in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County. City of Lodi is a signatory to San Joaquin County Mu*Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Pian (SJMSCP). Participation in the SJMSCP satisfies requirements of both the siate and federal endangered species acts, and ensures that the impacts are mitigated below a level of significance in aomptfanee with the California Environmerdat Quality Act (CEQA). The LOCAL JURISDICTION retains responsibility for ensuring that tine appropriate Incidental Take fu4ir IWzahon B-1 Measure are property implemented and monitored and that appropriate fees are paid In compliance with the SJMSCP. Although participation h the SJM3CP Is voluntary, Local JudWictioni-ead Agencies should be aware that If prefect applicants choose against participating in the SJMSCP, they will be required to provide ahemat ve mitigation in an amount and kind equal to that provided In the SJMSCP. ahs appMeant la provfd►ng an kriNa► Study. Whale nol proposed as spwdflc projects at this thee, I —� Ind►v►drlal hm" projects that rogLdre ground disturbance will be subject to pai tic►pate tri On SJMSCP and should fw resubmiltW to this agency. This Project Is srd>4feat to Lha &tAW". This can be up to a 30 day process and it is recommended that the project applicant contact SJhISCP staff as early as possible. It is also recornmendad that the project applicant obtain an information package. tetwwwww.srma.rxo Please contact SJMSCP staff regarding completing the following steps to satisfy SJMSCP requirements: • Schedule a SJMSCP Biologist to perform a pre-oonstruction survey pr►or to any ground d7stwbsdce • Sign and Return Incidemal Take Wnimlzation Measures to SJMSCP staff (given to project applicant After pre-cor>Btruction survey Is completed) • Pay appropriate (as based cn SJMSCP findings. Fees shall 4e paid In the amount In effect at the thne of Issuance of Building Permit Final Negative Declaration May 2011 B-3 3-6 Comment B a(Sscoo. Inc. Recelve your Certlflcate of Payment and release the rvqulned permit ft &WuVbo MWMffrffMh~hw anyPoANMW#MMGI& to was= o1dre[grrredSlaces(pursuantmSacliorQ4CwnWArActf It azrdd requwa ft WCYm w sn* vmhmlary wvaWa Mmugh !ire ix nipped prowsa wrd& dm S.R46W wNah cardd rake up a) W days. It may be p wdent m obhcin a proftamy woKmae nW from a quaff douuNar+t. N waters of" Vraw Snipe are awNlmwd an rhe proJet7 she, rhe Corps and Ow r?agWW Water OjmW Cx&d Board MW=) wmW hate rep &Rhy asftw oar 0Rba9 aWW araft &umwU b SMkxo 404 and 401ofthaatanW&MrActrespwftaryland permpewoufdbempkadfromeach of&ass B_3. resrrxcs gPRdes prior to waft the mqw aw. If you have any quesllons, please cad (208) 236-0600. Final Negative Declaration 3-7 May 2011 Comment B 31SJC0G, Inc. S J C 0 Crr Inc. San•joagudn County Multi Species Habitat Comrtrrkmw & Opts Spate Plan 555 East Weber Avenue ■ Stockton, CA 95= •(209) 235 -OM • PAX (209) 235-143$ SJMSCP HOLD TO: =11 Jurisdiction- Communhy_Dev_elmment Department. Plannirta Q2M=ent. Buiidino Department. Enaineerina Department. Survey Department. T. sportation DapaftgW. Other' FROM. Kimberly Juarez, SJCOG, Inc. DO NOT AUTHORIZE SITE DISTURBANCE DO NOT ISSUE A BUILDING PERMIT DO NOT ISSUE FOR THIS PROJECT The landowner/developer for this site has requested coverage pursuant to the San Joaquin County Mufti -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). In acoordance with that agruemunt, the Applicant has agreed to: 1 j Implement Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMMs) PRIOR to site disturbance. Do not authorize site disturbance until receipt of a lianwd Agreemard to IncidentalI B fo Measures AND verification that all applicable rrMMs hays been Implemented. 2) Pay SJMSCP tees. Fees shall be paid In the amount in effect at the time of lsauanoe of Building Permit (am also Appendix). Do not issue a Use permit until reralotof a CertlflcaM of Payment or Ven on lon of Payment to the Local B-5 Jurisdiction fe ga Rw*lpt) AND Veriflostjon that all (cable fTMMa have been Im femanted rforto ground disturbance. I Project irUe rnev Lena c Plan Landowner. Applicant: Aswswr Parcel Ne: Lrndee MUgq T . R__ Seallan(s): Local Jurisdiction Contact: Xcnradt Bartlam The LOCAL JtiRISDIC7 ON retains responsibility for ensuring that the appropriate Incidental Take Mini mfrstion Measures are properly Implemented and monitored and that appropriate fees are paid in oompilance with the SJMSCP. Final Negative Declaration 3-8 May 2011 Comment B RESPONSE TO COMMENT B Comment Letter B: San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG, Inc). Response to Comment B-1 Thank you for your input on this important City project. This comment is noted. Response to Comment B-2 Thank you for your input on this important City project. This comment is noted. Response to Comment B-3 This comment is noted. As stated on the IS< there are no waters of the Untied States near the project limits. Furthermore, the project does not involve any physical change to the environment as no construction is proposed. Response to Comment B4 This comment is noted. Response to Comment B-5 This comment is noted. Final Negative Declaration 3-9 May 2011 VIA TELEFAX (209.333.5842) And regular U.S. Mail Community Development Director City of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95241 Comment C c....d a■u>.y Senior Gencrrl Aleorney May 11, 2011 RECEIVED MAY 13 PQii CIJMMUNI-Y PE'iLL-i�ivlc[zT DEPT CITY I-) LUCI Re: Notice of Hearing of City of Lodi, California ("City) on Harney Lane Specific Plan of widening Harney Lane between South Hutchins Street and South Stockton Street which crosses Union Pacific Railroad ("Project") Dear Sir or Madam: By this letter, Union Pacific Railroad Company ("UPRR") provides its comments on the captioned Project. The proposed Project will widen Harney Lane in the area C-1 which crosses UPRR tracks on its Fresno Subdivision at grade. The widening of at grade crossings has the potential for serious interference with interstate and intrastate rail operations. There is an express federal policy encouraging the elimination of at -grade railroad crossings and encouraging grade separated crossings. The City needs to address safety measures and address how it intends to minimize risks due to the C-2 proposed widening of this crossing, to protect the traveling public, railroad workers and railroad operations. No widening of the crossing over UPRR tracks can occur without UPRR's approval of engineering design plans and traffic data, and the approval of the CA Public Utilities Commission. Such work, if approved by UPRR and the CA PUC, would also C-3 require entering into a Construction and Maintenance Agreement with UPRR. UPRR is opposed to Projects which have the effect of increasing the use of at grade crossings for safety reasons and the potential to interfere with rail operations, The City needs to consider a grade separation at the location where the Project crosses UPRR tracks for the safety of the public and to avoid interference with railI C4 operations. ... nlallamCalifomialcily of lodi Imp -031 I I1 ONION PACS PIC RAILROAh 1480 11)991;10L Slrecl Slop I.RO am alfa, NE 68179 14 (12) 54 4-44 68 Final Negative Declaration 3-10 May 2011 Please give notice to LIP of all future developments with respect to the Project as follows: Mr. Jim Smith Manager of Industry and Public Projects Union Pacnic Railroad Company 9451 Atkinson Street Roseville, CA 95747 ffe a couv to: Ms. Rebecca Hoffman Union Paclfic Railroad Company 1400 Douglas Street— STOP 1690 Omaha, NE 88179-1690 Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, 14V -4 -- cc: Jim Smith Rebecca Flo#fman Paul Farrell C-5 Final Negative Declaration 3-11 May 2011 Comment C RESPONSE TO COMMENT C Comment Letter C. Pacific Railroad Company Response to Comment C-1 Thank you for your input on this important City project. This comment is noted. Response to Comment C-2 This comment is noted. Response to Comment C-3 No physical improvements or construction activities are proposed in conjunction with implementation of the Harney Lane Specific Plan. This comment is noted. Response to Comment C4 The City notes that plans for the grade separation have commenced and it anticipates completing this at some time in the future. This comment is noted. Response to Comment C-5 This comment is noted. Final Negative Declaration 3-12 May 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 2048 STOCKTON, CA 95201 (1976 E. CHARTER WAW1976 E. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING 7R. BLVD. 95205) rM California Relay service (8{10) 735-2929 PHO14H (209) 941-1921 FAX (209)948-71N May 10, 2011 Manny Bereket City of Lodi 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240 Dear Mr. Bereket, Comment D RECEIVED MAY 13 2011 COMMUNt TY r:=_ 'L --Lo t�Irrs; a* eff ; UTY 7r 109S 10 -SJ -99, PM 28.48 Harney Lane Specific Pian SCH #2011042833 The California Department of Transportation (Department) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Harney Lane Specific Placa. The project, on Harney Lane between Stockton Street and Lower Sacramento Road in the City of D-1 Lodi, proposes to widen Harney Lane to relieve existing and future traffic congestion at the west - east bound road. Upon review of the project, the Department has the following comments; The improvements from the Harney Lane Specific Plan may result in potential adverse impacts to the current State Route 99 (SR-99)/14ainey Lane interchange. The Specific Plan states that it will not change traffic patterns or generate traffic. However, while the plan itself may not create traffic and help to alleviate congestion on Harney Lane west of SR -99, the construction of the proposed improvements will attract additional vehicles and encourage development, resulting in increased traffic along Harney Lane and eventually the SR-99/Harney Lane interchange, which has not been adequately studied to determine the impacts that will likely occur. Furthermore, with the City of Lodi's approval of the annexation of a 30 -acre mixed use development at Harney Lane and West Lane/Hutchins; Street, the construction of this Specific Pian may ultimately result in potential significant impacts to the SR-99/Harney Lane interchange. Due to the potential for significant impacts stated above, the Department requests that the applicant prepares a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to determine this proposed project's near-term and long-term impacts to the State Highway System (SI IS), including the SR-99111arney Lane interchange. The TIS should include a traffic simulation analysis to fully document expected impacts to existing and future levels -of -service on mainline segments of the SHS in the project vicinity and propose appropriate and feasible mitigation measures to address any and all expected impacts expected to deteriorate SHS operations beyond an acceptable level. Furthermore, the TIS should include an analysis of Specyle Plan impacts an the SR-99/Horney Lane interchange, including a timeline end potential funding sources for work on the Project Study Reportfor the interchange and a viable project to modify the interchanges It should be noted that the San Joaquin Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan lists the "Calmms Imprms mobilHpac.. Ca!ljomia" Final Negative Declaration May 2011 D2 FiR 3-13 Comment D Mr. Bereket May 10, 2011 Page 2 of 2 SR-99/Harney Latae interchange reoonstruction project as a Tier I project for Year 2016 (open to j traffic), and the City of Lodi supported this interchange project in a letter dated August 2, 2410 ID -3 (attachment). The Department recommends that the study be prepared in areordauce with the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traft Impact Studies, dated Decarnber 2082 (Guide) or the latest version. 17-4 Please submit the scope of work to the Department far review and comment prior to start of work on the TIS. The Department is available to discuss assumptions, data requirements, study scenarios, and analysis methodologies to help ensure that a quality TIS is prepared. Upon completion of the TIS, please provide three (3) paper copies along with a disk containing the complete electronic data files (Synchro 6, SimTraffic, Traflix 7.9, HCS, etc.) for our review and comment. This will help expedite the Department's review. D-5 1f you have any questions, please contact Sinarath Pheng at (209) 942-6492 (girnail- L Sinarath Pheng u[ dot.ea og_v) or myself at (209) 941-1921. Sincerely, TOM DUMAS, CHIEF OFFICE OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING Attachment Thf"m M wows arokfity amsa Cafflomm' Final Negative Declaration 3-14 May 2011 CITY COUNCIL CITY a F L O D I PHIL ItA7ZAKIAN, Mayor SUSAN HITCHCOCISPUBLIG WORKS DEPART M hl7 Meyer Pro Tempore CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET 1 P.O. BOX 8008 LARRY O. HANSEN LODI, CALIFORNIA 86241-1918 BOB JOHNSON TELEPHONE (208) 358-8708 1 FAX (200) $88-8710 JOANNE MOl1NCE EMAIL pWdept§lodl.gw h1tp;1AywwJodl.gor August 2, 2010 Mr. Rose Chittenden, DWW Direotor California State Department of Transportation - Diabid 10 P.D. Box 2048 Stoddon, CA 95205 81.16JECT. Route 98ftuW Lane Interim Improvement Project EA 10-OU780K - Design Period Comment D KomftADT PARTLAkr, Iirtarlm City Manager RANDr JOHL, city perk D. 1IMPHIM SCH WASAVER, City Attorney F, WALLY aANDELIN, Public Warks Director Fire Na. 8X-091 12) .0 w+ The Oty of Lodi Is requesting to use a abr year design period (Year 20 18) for the trafAc forrecaa" and operations analysis of the above slgnallzatlon project. Per the Highway Design Manuel Section 1032 "DeoWn Perlod', the standard period Is 20 years but warm be shdrioned with your approval. The: purpose for the s?gnafizaiion of the hft ro hange is to accommodate the addtifond traffto duo to the Reynolds Rands development in the southwest quadrant until the reconstructed interchange is completed in 2010. The City is dedicated to having the reconstructed Interchange in place and operational by this time, so a longer design period Would not be necessary. The odstfng Harney Lane overcrosdng is a two-lane Willy. it would read to be reconstructed ff a 20 year design period Is used vO the anticipated growth. The row structure profile would be approadmatety 12 to 15 feet higher than the existing bridge to accomrrwdate the vertical clearanca and design speed requirements. This would entall reoara#Ivcting the an Bnd off ramps as well. The City and District 10 staff are Currently worldng together to depose• this project to oonstmtiorl. The tragic forecasttkgi and operational analysts for the Year 2016 have been completed and the results show that the wdeting oelercrosshfq along with the proposed irnprovemerts can safely handle the forecasted volumes. The interchange reconsbuction is a Tier 1 project within the San Joaquin Counoll of Governments! current Regional Transportation Plan with funding for the construction of the lnterchanlge scheduled for FY 2019. For the above reasons and tits City's commitment to work with Caftans to reoonstimt the Interchange by 2016, we are requesting that you grant us approval to use a ebt-year design period for this Project. If you have any questions or meed additional lnformallon, Please rail me at (249) 333-6709. sty, F. Wal y n Public W DkBcicr FwslLrrprrr ax Nr TorrasAkw%. Celtwo oletrld 19 d*. K"roo Daft. MakThmm a Ce 0WA Ina W. Vete Of Mple, RM OM"ny l k, ne" RoberOmn. "M oo nlwny Mr. Klin wWaglelr, c"" Probota aw IC�iYIPSPRO.IE nte�ae0@10.dec D-6 Final Negative Declaration 3-15 May 2011 Comment D RESPONSE TO COMMENT D Comment Letter D: State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans District 10) CITY COUNCIL CITY OF L O D I BOB JOHNSON, Mayor JOANNE MOUNCE, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Mayor Pro Tempore CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET 1 P.O. BOX 3006 LARRY D. HANSEN LODI, CALIFORNIA 9524 1 -1910 PHIL KATZAKIAN TELEPHONE (209) 333-6706 1 FAX (209) 333-6710 ALAN NAKANISHI EMAIL pwdept@lodi,gav h ttp:liwww. I od I . g ov May 31, 2011 Department of Transportation, district 10 Attn: Tom Dumas P. a. Box 2058 Stockton CA 95201 KONRADT BARTLAM City Manager RANDI JOHL, City Clerk D. STEPHEN SCHWA9AUER, City Attorney F. WALLY 8ANDELIN, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Hamey Lane Specific Plan Negative Declaration SCH #2011042033 Dear Mr. Dumas: Thank you for your comments regarding the above project. Your interest in this project is appreciated and it is hoped that this response will help to answer your questions regarding this project. Comment: Your comments indicate that a traffic impact study (TI 3) is required for this project in order to determine the project study report's impacts to State facilities. Specifically, a TIS is needed to evaluate the project study report's impact on interchange and ramps at the intersection of State Route 99 and Hamey Lane, including a timeline and potential funding sources for work on the interchange. Response: The Harney Lane Specific Plan Report is a planning tool that will be used by the City as development occurs south of Harney Lane. The 2010 General Plan designates Harney Lane as a four -lane expressway between Lower Sacramento Road and State Route 99. The Specific Plan used the information from the General Pian to generate the lane configurations as shown in the report. Similar to the South Hutchins Project, if now development comes In before the new interchange Is constructed; the Developer will be required to analyze the capacity in the interim improvements at the Hamey Lane/SR-99 interchange end determine if further changes will be needed. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at (209) 333-6709. F. Wally 82ndelin Public Works Director FW=RB cc Sinio71+IErr►igelr11:10.,$fepn�e►v1 KAVIP7ROJEMT STRFET51HameyLaneSpecifimNFm Herney Lane MNDV euerto Caluans.doc Final Negative Declaration 3-16 May 2011 Comment E STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATS CLEARINGHOiMAND PLANNING UNrr JEMY BRDM CfOAiSF..l10a May 12, 2011, EC T � Z ' Pvfi:]Y 1 �i tori Manny Bereket City of Lodi 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95249 Subject: Harney Lane Spec Plan SCHA 2011042033 Dear Manny BerekeY. The State Clearinghouse submitted the above rained Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on May 11, 2011, and the comments from the responding agency (les) is (are) enclosed If this comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearin&use irnmediately. Please refer to the project's ten -digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21104(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comtaents regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific docnIDentation.n These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental docurnaut. Should you need more information or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly_ This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements For draft envimumental documents, pursuant to the California E pvbvrunantai Quality Act. Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. Sin , 111� Scott Morgan Director, State Cleeringhouse Enclosures cc: Resources Agency 140010th Street U. Hoz 3044 Saaameat% California 95812-3044 (916) 445.0613 FAX (916) 373.3018 www.opr ts,gov Final Negative Declaration 3-17 May 2011 Comment E Docu fnent Detaiis Report State Clearinghouse Data Base - SCHti 2011042033 Prgioof Title Haney Lane specific Plan Lead Agency Lodi, City of Type Nag Negative Declaration Deacrlpfion The proposed Haney Lane Specific Plan details roadway improvernsnts, establish the necessary right-cf way required to accommodate the roadway improvements and it aifacis a total of 47 privalx iy-owned parcels. Proposed right-of-way acqulsitlons would oewr in oonjunckon with actual construction projects. No physical improvements or construction activities are proposed In conjunction with Implementation of the Hamey Lane Speciffo Plan. Subsequent development In the Plan Area, including all Subdivisions, Site plan Reviews, Planned Development Review, and Conditional Use Permits will be subject to environmental review on a project -by -project basis. Lead Agency Contact Name Manny Bereket Agency City of Lodi Phone (209) 333.6711 Fax emaFf waterway's Address 221 West Pine Street City Lodi State CA Zip 95240 Project Location Courcy San Joaquin Gly Lodi Region - LatlLong 38° 101'06' N1 121*.283' .98" W Cross Sfreefs Lower Sacramento Road, Stockton Street & West Lane Parcel No. Township Range Section ease Proximity to; Highways Hwy 12, 99 Airports Railways UPRR, CCT waterway's Schools Land Else Z: Commerical Low and Mufti Density Residence OF. Commercial Low and Multi Density Reefdence Project issues Air Quality; Arehasobogic-Historic; Noise; RecreatfontFarks; SchoolalUniversities RayfeWng Resources Agency; Deparimerd of Fish and Game. Region 2; Office of Historic Preservation; Agencies Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Watar Resources; Califomla Highway Pahnl; Caltrans, District 10; Regional Water Quality Control Bd„ Region 5 (Sacramento); Department of ToAc Substances Control; Nallve American Heritage Commission 0509 Received 04/12/2011 StartafReview 04/12/7011 EndofftWow 0519 112 01 1 Note: Blanks in data fields reault from insufficient Information provided by lead agency. Final Negative Declaration 3-18 May 2011 Comment E RESPONSE TO COMMENT E Comment Letter E: Office of Planning and Research This comment is noted. The letter from the State Clearinghouse demonstrates that the Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration were circulated for a 30 -day period review, commencing on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 through Wednesday, May 5, 2011. It acknowledges only one State Agency (Caltrans District 10 - Comment D) was directly submitted to the State Clearinghouse. The review requirements for draft environmental document have been fulfilled. No response is necessary. Final Negative Declaration 3-19 May 2011 July 9, 2011 Ms. Randi Johl City Clerk City Hall 221 West Pine Street, 2"`� Floor Lodi, CA 95240 Re: City Council Public Hearing July 20, 2011 Dear Ms. Johl.: This letter is to put forth my comments and concerns regarding the Harney Lane Specific Plan Report. I realize that my views will not stop the widening of Harney Lane, but wanted to express my opposition to the Plan generally and strongly oppose the amount of property that will be required from property owners and the ultimate plan for an 1.6-18' median with trees. I believe that, coupled with a planned bicycle lane, is excessive. That wide a median is not necessary and with the City of Lodi's lack of finances, planting trees would require watering and upkeep which would cost more money the City does not have. Also, not being able to have easy ingress and egress to our property is a concern. When I retired I thought I'd be able to live peacefully in the country and the Specific Plan will definitely now allow that. In fact, just the opposite. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Sincerely, -.j Joyce Tanabe 07/11/2011 03:30pm DELL1125 2093342654 #089 Page 01/02 • CITY OF LORI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Carnegie Forum Date: July 20, 2011 305 West Pine Street, Lodi Time: 7:00 p.m. For information regarding this notice please contact: Randi Johl, City Clerk Telephone: (209) 333-6702 NOTICE CAP PUBLIC HEARING I. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, July 20, 2011, at the hour of - 7:0G-p:m.Tor,as -soon-thereafter-as-the -mattermay-be-heard-the--Ciiy.- Council-; conduct a public hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to consider the following matter: a) Resolution approving Harney Lane Specific Plan Report and certifying the Harney lane Specific Pian Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the Public Works Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, (209) 333-6706. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be fled with the City Cleric, City Hall, 221 West Pine Street, 2n0 Floor, Lodi, 95240, at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Cleric, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the close of the public hearing. B er of the Lodi City Council: I City Clerk Dated: June 15, 2011 2gin;ot� D. Stephen Schwabauer City Attorney N:Usdminlilro11p1�CLERIflAcdsFleerwD71C�S1NPtPW,doc CLCwc1PUBHEAMNOT10ES1NoTPWow &W11 07/11/2011 03;30pm DELL1125 2093342654 #089 Page 02/02 To :City of Lodi Regarding: Brian Hayn 8103 E. Harney Lane, Lodi Ca Meeting Resolution approving Harney Lane specific Plan report This is my written response of concerns regarding this plan and how it will affect my property. will not be able to attend the meeting however, I would like to have my concerns on file for future legal purposes if needed. My concerns: 1. Closeness of road to front door of my home. Plan shows property line through my garage which is approx. 6 ft from my front door, 2. Additional traffic will bring additional noise. The widening of Lower Sac has already increased the traffic and speed of traffic by one side of my property. 3. Access restriction, high volumes of traffic and center barrier will restrict my access to property. (try to back up a boat or trailer into driveway ? ) 4. How will this affect the value of my property withal[ of the above? I cannot resell my home currently without disclosing to potential buyer about this plan. S. What type of soundwall or barrier will I have from traffic to protect my home/property. I have already had one car totalled while sitting outside and one car through my fence. The closeness of the property line to additional traffic would cause concerns for safety, if no wall or barrier is installed. 6. Removal of shrubs and trees along the front of my property. These shrubs and trees create a barrier for some privacy, shade, and help dampen noise. The plan shows a sidewalk, bike lane and traffic lanes taking the place of my front vard, While this plan is decided upon for the future growth and accomodation for additional traffic flow, I want there to be some focus on how it affects us home owners, who are giving up our right to peaceful enjoyment of our homes/properties. Homeowners should be compensated for more than just the value of the land taken. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN AND CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN WHEREAS, the Harney Lane Specific Plan covers the area from the city limits on the west to South Stockton Street on the east; and WHEREAS, after conducting two public meetings, providing two mailings to affected property owners, and meeting individually with concerned residents, staff recommends approving the Harney Lane Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the City, as the lead agency, prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and published a Notice of Availability (NOA) announcing that the Harney Lane Specific Plan Draft Negative Declaration had been prepared and was available to the public for review. The NOA was submitted to the State Clearinghouse, distributed to local agencies, sent to interested persons, posted with the County Clerk's office, mailed to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the project boundary, posted on the City's website and published in the Lodi News Sentinel. The 30 -day window for review and comment on the draft Negative Declaration commenced on Tuesday, April 12, 2011, and concluded on Wednesday, May 11, 2011; and WHEREAS, staff recommends certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the Harney Lane Specific Plan and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Dated: October 5, 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2011- was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held October 5, 2011, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — RANDIJOHL City Clerk 2011- The City of Lodi Public Works Engineering r login `• h } l F Harney Lane Specific Plan Agenda Item G-1 October 5, 2011 Purpose • Establish Future Right of Way —Western City Limit to Hutchins Street • Inform Public of Planned Future Improvements — Four lane expressway east of Lower Sacramento Road — Four lane minor arterial west of Lower Sacramento Road — Auxiliary lanes at some intersections • Identify Potential Acquisitions at 47 Properties — Dedications required upon development — Interim and ultimate plans for construction — Need driven by future growth and increased traffic History • January 2008 -Shirtsleeve Meeting • July 2008 —Retained Mark Thomas and Co. • June 2010 - 1St Public Meeting • June 2010 to October 2010 -One-on-One Meetings (30 meetings) • November 30, 2010 -Shirtsleeve Meeting • January 24, 2011 - 2nd Public Meeting 101 One -On -One Meetings • First Public Meeting • 543 notices mailed • Newspaper advertising • Posted on City website • 52 citizens attended • Follow Up - 30 One -on -One Meetings • Two invitations sent to several property owners • Multiple meetings with several property owners 4 �2 Issues/Concerns • How much of my property will be needed? • When is the street widening going to occur? • How will I get compensated for the right of way? • Moving the right of way closer to my house will devalue my property and how will I be compensated? • Why does the median have to be so wide? • Will the access to my property change? 1400. 19 a IUTM IN I a IZ NIW,Lr,-!uhj=U4■-,� 0 Segment 1 Segment 3 West of Lower Mills Ave to Sacramento Rd Hutchins St ri A Ift A iL �_7 Segment 2 Lower Sacramento Rd to Mills Ave 01W Ah 40, MV . �-. At V Segment 4 Grade Separation MT Na JI!i _. �,Lj NJ !."I Jr. L --' A I l o L Segment 1 West of Lower Sacramento Road Existing Conditions Interim Improvements ✓ 7.5 feet —north side ✓ 0 to 2.5 feet —south side Ultimate Improvements through 2025 after 2025 after 2045 1 1111 Segment T � Lower Sacramento Road to County Line • Existing Conditions (55 feet) through 2025 • Interim Improvements after 2025 ✓ Add intersection turn lanes ✓ Widen to 4 lanes ✓ 4 reduced front yards (0 — 7 feet) • Ultimate Improvements (110 feet) after 2035 ✓ North side — 2 acquisitions, 3 reduced front yards (22 - 29 feet) ✓ South side — 3 reduced front yards (19 - 26 feet) 4 Segment 2 County Line to Mills Avenue Existing Conditions (R/W width varies) through 2025 Interim Improvements after 2025 ✓ Widen to 4 lanes ✓ North side — 1 reduced front yard (17 feet) ✓ South side — 3 reduced front yards (7 feet) ✓ South side — 5 reduced front yards (12.5 feet) Ultimate Improvements (110 feet) after 2035 ✓ North side — No R/W required ✓ South side — 3 reduced front yards (14 feet) ✓ South side — 5 reduced front yards (18.5 feet) Segment 3 1�wr Mills Avenue to Hutchins Street • Interim Improvements ✓ None • Ultimate Improvements (110 feet) ✓ North side — 1 reduced yard (14 feet) ✓ South side — 3 properties (0 - 15 feet) ➢ Development properties ➢ Timing development driven Right of Way Acquisition 1. Full Dedication as a Condition of City Entitlement 2. Purchased by City at Time of Interim Improvements 3. Purchased by City at Time of Ultimate Improvements r -I 31ti 4�Wm r -Pel 'Ph I" NP 93 — Westgate Dr Mills Ave am Ln 'fee, F =01110 l47 Hutchins St Ip j% Ir Lower Sacramento DA I L L4 :7 . . . . . . . . ....... .... �estr-lcted Intersectic Y?� - A �— R� Awl—o ;. Legacy Wy 4 Winchester Dr 4 Crown PI OPPY Dr _ ,. � `•'moi � ' Mti �� - +� - Future Rd Future Rd - Future Rd Future Rd ~ *I — J} —. Segment 4 Grade Separation • Design Contract Expected to be Awarded • Alternatives ➢ Overpass (lowest cost) ➢ Underpass (highest cost) • Selection of Alternative • Scheduled for March 2012 Segment 4 Costa Property Without Grade Separation • Two Access Points on Harney Lane • Maintain Corner Access —Foreseeable Future • Relocate Corner Access —Operations and Accidents .r Segment 4 Costa Property Interim Improvements n r t R s 73 ; ORM TO EyQSTNG S' f1 QRA[7E $MARATIM "k E A '- - f ElCISTNd RIW D' -Tr RIW NEEDED , TEWORAMY RELOCATE— �'. FENCE AND GATE WITH r c - ;q V WROVENENT OF TURN OUT LADES ,. i NTERSECTION RIGHT Nma-rr OUT OILY - - ' ' f DRFVEWAY ACCESS { (TREES TO BE RE]WWOVED) '' FAL COSTA Recommended Action •Approve Harney Lane Specific Plan Report • Approve Harney Lane Negative Declaration as Adequate Environmental Documentation Questions? 4 Segment 4 Costa Family Request Provide Acceleration Lane for Eastbound Trucks Why • Better Access Available on West Lane • Seasonal Use • Millions of Dollars to Add Lane to Grade Separation • Acceleration Lanes are Uncommon to Expressways • Current Usage is Limited FELIX COSTA & SONS Cherry Packing and Marketing COMPANY BASICS $15,000,000 in annual sales — half in export sales 550+ employees — many also PCP employees In business since 1927 Packing and marketing at the present location since 1960 TRAFFIC GENERATED DAILY 200 employee cars 50+ buyer, inspector cars 30+ refrigerated tractor/trailer units 20+ smaller trucks 40+ miscellaneous local field fruit deliveries SHIFT TIMES Shift #1 packing 7:00 am to 4-8:00 pm Shift #2 packing 8:00 am to 5-9:00 pm Truck loading/unloading 7:00 am to 1:00 am Fumigations 9:00 pm to 6:00 am HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Ammonia —.for refrigeration systems Methyl Bromide - fumigation for quarantine purposes Per Acetic Acid and Chlorine — microbial contamination control during packing F & L COSTA FAMILY LP Timeline for Harney Lane Specific Plan February 6, 2008 Greg Costa appeared before Council and expressed concern for continued access onto Harney Lane. December 18, 2008 Greg Costa email to Planning Commission — need for access from both West Lane and Harney Lane. June 8, 2010 First Public Meeting at Henderson School — no Harney access shown. July 17, 2010 First meeting between Costas and Public Works — discussed problems with West Lane and need for Harney Lane access. October 5, 2010 Second meeting between Costas and Public Works — first mention of early movement on Grade Separation. January 6, 2011 Letter with map from Public Works — Harney Lane access with decel/accel lane. January 19, 2011 Third Meeting between Costas and Public Works — still have Harney Lane access with deceUaccel lane and early movement on Grade Separation. January 25, 2011 -Second Public Meeting at Henderson School — map with Harney Lane access and deceUaccel lane. February 7, 2011 Revised Plan for Carl Fink — map shows Harney Lane access and deceUaccel lane. May 11, 2011 Final Harney Lane Specific Plan prepared - access point on Harney Lane moved west of Banyon; no deceUaccel land shown; temporary roads shown on Grade Separation Alternative #3 and #4. Page 1 of 1 Greg Costa From: "Greg Costa" <costasquad@verizon.net> To: <kchadwick@lodi.gov> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 5:31 PM Subject: Fw: Comment on Draft Preferred Plan ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Costa To: ppatrick@lodichamber.com Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 5:18 PM Subject: Comment on Draft Preferred Plan Planning Commission City of Lodi Dear Commission Members Our family owns the parcel on the southeast corner of Harney and West Lane. My parents have lived on the property for over fifty years and farmed and packed cherries at that location. We have two major concerns regarding the Draft Preferred Plan. First, the Mixed Use Center Zoning is new and - to my knowledge - not yet formally defined. It did not appear in any of the previously circulated Alternatives. Our parcel is shown as a combination of Mixed Use Center and Low Density Residential in the Draft Preferred Plan. This is significantly different from what was requested in my parents letter of 2007 to the Community Development Department describing their desired longterm uses for the property. (This letter was in response to the request for General Plan Update input.) This is different from what was indicated in the planning and engineering for the Area of Benefit established in the early 1990's of which this parcel is part. Finally this is different from the zoning for this parcel shown in earlier Planning Alternatives A,B and C. We have been assured by the Planning Department that the Mixed Use Center Zoning would allow all of the commercial development options and flexibility of the Commercial Zoning designation. Is this the intent and understanding of the Planning Commission? Second, the Draft Preferred Plan does not address the issue of future access to Harney Lane from our parcel. As we presented at the City Council Meeting of February 6, 2008 we presently have access and right-of-way onto Harney Lane from the north side of the property. This is very important to the viability of our existing farming and packing operations. It will be very important in the future even with different land uses. This was clearly demonstrated yet again this past Monday December 15 when West Lane was closed from Armstrong Road to Harney Lane the entire morning due to downed power poles. Our only access for the employees and commer ' " farming equipment was through our Harney Lane entrance points. We ask that the Planning Commission keep this in mind when discussing future development of the Harney Land corridor. Thank you. Greg Costa 12/18/2008 FUTURE ROADWAY • _ � �� 1 � ^ • �"fit. • ' •+ $�k RIP It It lh IL lb, v lb 'Ilk wr� � � �• �� ` �` say''• �°' s '�, .�:' '� 's � � � ! 't a � i. " a �..w sr. ♦. �M '► �'"Ilk1p10XL t HUTCHINS ST. ti `` LN yy r `* .� K • �y TA 4 now X11 Ilk IV S 4 A �• yw� ~ ,� a. � � t �. 4. �i` ',. 1 w , J1. ti,�' ;�1 h • r' F M4 i. k ti `1 T R 1 y s� ti �� r\ k_` 'NIN � ,e"� ,� � , � ., � `t `• '� � jar •' ll.. �' � �, ,IV. ■�t� Vx te ` 7 , .4 i i IN �`. �yr K w►� �� '♦■��►S��xl. r�4��`k •.1�. � yt � - s', �P'-�'�-�'`� . l.. � '� _'� 4,r' ti I - Y K:ICADDIEXHIBITS12007107X036107X036.dwg, Costa aerial, 07/12/2010 9:45:23 AM CITY COUNCIL CITY OF L O D I BOB JOHNSON, Mayor JOANNE MOUNCE, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Mayor Pro Tempore CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET / P.O. BOX 3006 LARRY D. HANSEN LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 PHIL KATZAKIAN IAN TELEPHONE (209) 333-6706 / FAX (209) 333-6710 ALAN NAKA EMAIL pwdept@lodi.gov http://www.lodi.gov January 6, 2011 Felix Costa and Greg Costa 13160 N. West Lane Lodi, CA 95240 SUBJECT: Harney Lane Specific Plan Mr. Costa, KONRADT BARTLAM City Manager RANDI JOHL, City Clerk D. STEPHEN SCHWABAUER, City Attorney F. WALLY SANDELIN, Public Works Director The City of Lodi has prepared an exhibit that shows each of the phases that will affect your property at 13160 North West Lane. Please review this exhibit prior to our next meeting so we can discuss any changes you would like to be made. Should you have any questions prior to our meeting, please call me at 333-6800 ext. 3321. �L Chris Boyer Junior Engineer K:\WP\PROJECTS\STREETS\HameyLaneSpecificPlan\Costa Letter.doc � r - � � „ isamw�-,rd"'°"�" x 'MPI • '�' . � 1ywn.r....� r� . r s �` _ �. i. � �''% `�.S"�:"v�.'t'S4!�>.�w�..� �{.,.if. ,�.. •:�" _.r ..-_�ti `.j . rr� . ��. y, ... .;iT � `�d'''.. '. A� . �- �. ��l'�'. , f .96 rP.+lPl - _fl � �r:�'taua "" � r � •s, r.. �! 3 �� - .. � � 3. ; y � -i � i r;�:=' 1 �y'� r�k •4` ,� �,.� T � ^Yf _ .+7—.,�,k,,,,,,,, �� I`�'y, ?'� c �' _ �?` ,� Fa . ,f�.. �. - � 4 .::��,Sc, �� `.y� ' � f ] � � .� of �t ,:i 'f r _ �..r.� -a•''- ...•::.e:w �: y[�rP�c, f r .,� +."r,` � \kti..lv'' r - " 7 - } _� � r. c � r i , � y 'i'. ,r •� ,� "�` -_o ..:...-. .�..:i.-:.:-oma' �7s ; ' y • ' : . is a'• Y' -.'� � - A°, s - }''. � _ . f � y .:.,,'e+`a:.Yr'.rrr, -_n-a...,�.� � a F '>1 , s e w . per«-t++.'-..•.i.t 1.. ��. - - - �� 1f'. � 040. }iWOW- �/' >ti�LLd9P -w=MFS +'.i�r. a or l'''tx r qtr r ra It o v v` + �A- �� •?�' .'j wSr�- a -Y� ��; r _ t � `� y�•'�" s -,�}': s t �`'' j C 'r. �,-sss.:u=...,4.tia�.ss-a..:.s.•.: M;,Ft,rr.;: w >, x 10 0 LEGEND: EXISTING R/W -PROPOSED R/W PROPERTY LINE CITY/COUNTY LIMITS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION TYPICAL CROSS SECTION p nV q=-4 PEE# ULTIMATE HARNEY LANE MIROVEWArrS WTERNW HARNEY LANE AFROVEMEWS SOUTH STOCKTON STREET/ HARNEY LANE MMSECTION MARI rhi)AAs & COMPANY• , Nc' CITY OF LODI HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN SCALE r-60' PAGE 4 OF 4 Please immediately confirm receipt of this fax by calling 333-6702 CITY OF LODI P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN REPORT AND CERTIFYING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN PUBLISH DATE: SATURDAY, JULY 30, 2011 TEAR SHEETS WANTED: One (1) please SEND AFFIDAVIT AND BILL TO: LNS ACCT. #0510052 DATED: THURSDAY, JULY 28, 2011 ORDERED BY: RANDI JOHL CITY CLERK J IFER M. OBISON, CMC ASSISTANT CITY CLERK RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK City of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95241-1910 MARIA BECERRA ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK Verify Appearance of this Legal in the Newspaper — Copy to File Faxed to the Sentinel at 369 1084 at (time) on (date) (pages> , LNS Phoned to confirm receipt of all pages at (time) CF _MB JMR (Initials) fonns\advins.doc DECLARATION OF POSTING PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN REPORT AND CERTIFYING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN On Thursday, July 28, 2011, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a Notice of Public Hearing to consider resolution approving Harney Lane Specific Plan Report and certifying Harney Lane Specific Plan Negative Declaration as adquate environmental documentation for Harney Lane Specific Plan (attached and marked as Exhibit A) was posted at the following locations: Lodi Public Library Lodi City Clerk's Office Lodi City Hall Lobby Lodi Carnegie Forum I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 28, 2011, at Lodi, California. JE IFER M. POBISON, CMC ASSISTANT CITY CLERK N:\Administration\CLERK\Fonns\DECPOSTPW.DOC RANDI JOHL CITY CLERK MARIA BECERRA ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK •. CITY OF LODI Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Date: October 5, 2011 Time: 7:00 p.m. For information regarding this notice please contact: Randi Johl, City Clerk Telephone: (209) 333-6702 NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, October 5, 2011, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a continued public hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to consider the following matter: a) Resolution approving Harney Lane Specific Plan Report and certifying Harney Lane Specific Plan Negative Declaration as adquate environmental documentation for Harney Lane Specific Plan. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the Public Works Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, (209) 333-6706. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk, City Hall, 221 West Pine Street, 2 I Floor, Lodi, 95240, at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the close of the public hearing. By QrdI7 of the Lodi City Council: di J City Clerk Dated: July 20, 2011 D. Stephen Schwabauer City Attorney N:\Administration\CLERK\PubHear\NOTICES\NotPW.doc CLERK\PUBHEAR\NOTICES\NotMdoc 7/27/11 yOF� O FO Please immediately confIrm receipt Of this fax by calling 333-6702 CITY OF LODI P. O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN REPORT AND CERTIFYING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN PUBLISH DATE: SATURDAY, JUNE 18, 2011 TEAR SHEETS WANTED: One (1) please SEND AFFIDAVIT AND BILL TO: LNS ACCT. #0510052 DATED: THURSDAY, JUNE 16, 2011 ORDERED BY: RANDI JOHL CITY CLERK JENNIFER M. ROBISON, CMC ASSISTANT CITY CLERK formsWviw.doc RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK City of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 96241-1910 IA B E4 RRA CLERK -,"M 7UO 9�DECLARATION OF POSTING IjF: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN REPORT AND CERTIFYING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN On Thursday, June 16, 2011, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a Notice of Public Hearing to consider resolution approving Harney Lane Specific Plan Report and certifying Harney Lane Specific Plan Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for Harney Lane Specific Plan (attached and marked as Exhibit A) was posted at the following locations: Lodi Public Library Lodi City Clerk's Office Lodi City Hall Lobby Lodi Carnegie Forum I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 16, 2011, at Lodi, California. JENNIFER M. ROBISON, CMC ASSISTANT CITY CLERK N-.,Adminismdon\CLERK\Foms\DECPOSTPW.DOC ORDERED BY: RANDI JOHL CITY CLERK IA BECERRA VAA ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK (2) PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN REPORT AND CERTIFYING HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN On Thursday, June 16, 2011, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing Notice of Public Hearing to consider resolution approving Harney Lane Specific Plan Report and certifying Harney Lane Specific Plan Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for Harney Lane Specific Plan, attached hereto marked Exhibit A. The mailing list for said matter is attached hereto, marked Exhibit B. There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 16, 2011, at Lodi, California. JENNIFER M. ROBISON, CMC ASSISTANT CITY CLERK Forms/decmait.doc ORDERED BY: RANDIJOHL CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI IAB ERRA ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK CITY OF LODI Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date: July 20, 2011 Time: 7:00 P.M. For information regarding this notice please contact: Randi Johl, City Clerk Telephone: (209) 333-6702 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, July. 20, 2011, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a public hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to consider the following matter: a) Resolution approving Harney Lane Specific Plan Report and certifying the Harney Lane Specific Plan Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the Public Works Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, (209) 333-6706. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk, City Hall, 221 West Pine Street, 2nd Floor, Lodi, 95240, at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing: If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the close of the public hearing. B er of the Lodi City Council: Ae:: rl City Clerk Dated: June 15, 2011 moved as to form: D. Stephen Schwabauer City Attorney N: W dmi r istrationICLERKiPubHeaANOTICESW otP W.doe O N N h � d R �-,-- Ilcmnallollcn Mo --.r_—l'_' ; ._�__.r_� ....Y_...� M C1' n Mme~ � t0 01 i N M O 10 M' 00 n • an O M M Ol n 1l1 �' O m O 61 a-1 O ei O ri Ot 01' 111 n rtilfl�lC► .I��lamij,�`glirn�11� �� mn N N 00ni cnu1"1Lni rtNNN {{ ( N O I N ei O N N N N N epi N N NICSIO OI00 N}cV.Ntt`1:OIN 011�iNINi t !I Idld et d d d of d d d d d et et v et�• a-t4d!dt�{rfld d�OIN d1�I, 1 N NiN fVItO;N N NININ N N�N;N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N � , ( I N i O Ol 61 I G1 tT 61 01 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 01 C1 01 61 d1 M 61 Cl 01 G1 111([11 N ' [11 to an I LA 111 N .111 111 t11 M Ln t11 1!1 1n 111 to 111 111 111 N to t!1 111 t11 111 1A to 11f !! 1 ttt to to C1; Ol Ol I O1 01 01 01 O1iO1 101�C1� 61 C? •- I _ 0 Iii v O O IOi JO1 J :o O J3J -a2O IO OO miQIJlO J !OO v I 1 > t�0 t�t1 N 1 � >, � � I • � >- d � CU 01 0) 01 •C U � 0) p sa*a�>clalc3>>`°L�To°'3�� ;vLalalm°E= ��i6 T=�p'O _ •C •L m O m U C Q J J U •% '_. : n t J O O ,= n m J 0 oranomfl3m`9ro0 0� �oo��$ienna>ieso�_�rcad3 J U LO) - h= V >• Qj 01 .L m 'i TI f6 Q� y m 01 = 1A w m C C Q L L O •a Y x x L 'O >. T t6 O i 'O O T O O t� O = ^� L `-i i� X m VVO o y_= C p I¢ iII R= x m y N Z O x x O 1r^ cox n1 m o= 00 m m Ln > u o 11, x x m a xiui cm v x �c ,A W m .-1 o n n rn L1 `'s n N °" ri W o M M G N i Lu N w 10 to 1D n o 0 1A N p 00 r1 N M N Q ^ V 0 N w LA MSM O 0�1 LNAIN M0�� O O O N o0 O n M N �• O N n n N �t r 11 1A N r1 t N, N M t '-t N r1 G. 00 �-1 a-1 N d �-1 M l lil tiIj1II c Iy ml - LU T = M Q = I-8 wiQ 1 N �I 10i L N Y C C 1m�=I� 'I iii I = tm =y.� L m co = ti3 s3 . _ . I = eo = I -o fl, c L _ = m co ,- a „? _ m _ a p m m �n I tcI ai y a co :° ca m l6 •� +� yd, co 1p m I}} y m m L i 'O .� d0 13 y L '>3 L C C V > N f0 M Q C T. i L ._ I C O W LL G= `' L a1 m io m L O m a O O •C d — eo m II L -o O m W -� aC W f6 0) u N 4) = O ,_ •L i L • c1pp tp N N Q_ OC t1 m (� m ! U' Ci J I �L _ C7 -mi Q F•' V1 U C� Q OG �! J f•� -- f—T { L NIT +m,v °a a a� a alaJala I I I i I I ! I! iI iili!iiliiillli i 1 I I I MII + ' ,� .I t i l l i i •� i i I , •N I= C N Y O v L m > •� QI C C '13 T NlY Y Y f0 m f6 c= L L L a+ t6 e6 Rf co��mmtocaca _ 3 V U u 01 G1 N d 01 a O O mm ¢mm12 I I I i I I ! I! iI iili!iiliiillli i 1 I I I MII + ' ,� .I t i l l i i •� i i I , ei I ci NIN d' 01 O 01 00 01 (� N N Q1• I v N 01 (1 O t� O to N d• m M I� i N I� 00 N r i O N • n OO I O i� I �I^!�Oi N N g et er c v M n Ln Ln m m Q1 61 {QQ QQ1 'QQ1gQf 01 i et 01 M i t� O '1,TN":" I� N MINN.O d' 1 tC {I u ! Ln LNf1 01.6111101 UIU ite1" tf1 01 QQ ,U 1 dTN W! 01 � ei I� I^� N i �' e1' Cr1 t(1 iNlf m 0 m 0 I !aQi U VICJtV N M M �-1 tC 00 ac+ N tf! .0I 00 "t M LNt1 tNf1 M 61 IQI (SIC 16 00 00 N d' IN1f 01 ch O M I� N cfi N N d' C1' LNfl Ln M 01 Q 6 61} jto N I 1O 00 N tD d' 1� t11 01 01 ¢t C�16 00 � 1� O M N N u1 O C1 � O 00 tC N N N N 00 N d' M �t I,A �l' d' M N M N tNl1 61 01 61 01 01 01 ;515 Cf C1 (3 O O tQ N ei tC 1 N 00 1� 00 ri tl1 I� all n N Q N N N N N N v �7 ehC}'fLn N tNl1 LNf1 LNf1 tN11 ,lt tN11 N M 61 01 01 01 01 01 61 01 U C3 U U C� 666 Q I�}�UCJ'U11;i!C3 QQ ai I i , I Is CI o :a O M— O m n O O a O J' 1001 a�' :a°o M J ? J I M zs =o a 'a '00-C � 1 JJJ JJ JI N J J I` _ I I I ,III I l fv 0) C I fo C V �_ fo w 41 0) > d 5 0>2 0 C C Q) C V V co O) L fll•1. o O O 3j y % v o m R) U C ° 0 ca a fo L r Q N c' fo J O 5 O :2 3 y. d R U m �C O o M O O C O O 3 C O O L U •L m 3 T n 0 L Q' Y L N p p 0 `'S •0 p M� fll f0 C 7 fo L pOp Y C A p% fU C L• ,1G �. = O •L O c� 0_ 3 a� p—ppp r.. 00 >3 C 61 p t0 0 p d= S O p O L Cc_ S 01 ym fa S Yn A -a E Y= .- G = L C r C .- = O O @ O ++ ip 3 ne f6 S O 'L f0 fo L a 'o U N m fA X p O m O 0. U, u �i X of O m m 3 i0 Q �G 10 U N 16 X 0) ° C. O Q a -0 n _ 10 L N y ++ > m S �' n O 1� d. fA W O1 00 01 e•i NLn N d' N' M M N t6 e4 O iMA dN dM O M N O Ln Q N O d' O Ln O v-4 n N O 0 N Z O 01 N' -1 to to N M OM1 R 0 4 Ol LL N ri 0 0 M ON1 000 000 N 00 N e -i N t -i e•i tf1 fn N e•1 N N i -i N awl N ei N ti N O. N e -i a-1 �-1 P .•i 4 N l �••1 N N M e4 1.4 a i C tp L i I { co Y A m C I f�TQ T N N fo 1 L i �) j• I l C i6 c6 S L) N y D I C I U Ctia Y C3 p G1 Q -� _ I C ` Ifo •p C fo "D O C C 'C to = = v_f C I f0 0 'a 4= N cc L ►' 0) C 402 J c, O) 41 L R C'' O C cc C C A _ V� O ) 'O N= d 0 •� _ N ` C 7 1 L U t6 T r 0 10) N 0) f0 mi = O M t E CL. = ; fo G. « aO+ to � = O p � Z v = c� _ � O U Q Q -� Q f'QO Ycl " � N f0 � � n 'Q Q -pi f/) m c J U Q .0> 0. -moi I J m i OL W Q G -moi tY W c. N N W -� to rn I t I N 0)I { 3 O O Y E C) 1= C V f6 c m CI a O 41 fU L _ 31 T� Y d C{ a CI ++ O N y ; l y t = ;= L to m C Y �' 4 i ° H y t t0 p y i fV •f0 (ip- O C Y VI++ i Q E fLo N y N L— tr f6 N i 'L f0 s f0 T (� ++ V V C N N N O O p° .Q N �N f0 = t6 f0 t0 f6 f L L O U U U D D Q O O L m m 3 ��`` m m m m m m ►ii m U I I U U {Iji1 U U U , ff�l U V U {i I U U U � �1 V U Ejl U U U U U } r1. j{ illl i ill il�Iillljil ;III �I�;If .j i� {►I1 ;� III ill,, 1 O 00 N t0 a0 M Ol N O! ei O Ol h d N W Ln h 00 I Td I M — ei N 6(1 N� d O e ei O a 00 ct M �"1 01 CO t0 O o� -4 Ln N O 00 CS O O e t QO h C1 .�u� �-+ho� h O ei IA d 00 C1 M N tC �nooh nrnofNgh I Itn 101 .-itn t0 O.-Ihoor O h h ct h O1 V� h a1 h^ 00 h 61 M N Q� 9 r.M CS N N G5 I N ppr N N I N N N N " N O el n N N O N ct d d d N d N N C1 d �t d N d N N a p N 011 N O N d In I 01161 LA LA I 61 ct In Ol d LM I M V LA I 61 et In m d m 61 ct N � 01 V N m In 61 d N M C4In o In M 61 A to 01 Ln 61 Ln LA ti 1 Ln ttnn 01 61 m 01 01 N Ln 61 N tNf1 01.01 M N I Ln M LNfI tf1 LNIt tNl1 Ol 01 01 01 M m m m m to m 61 61 Ol 01 61 01 16 �'�!� �i� 6 5t�3i�'c�ta3. c�3 c� u15 5 5 ;5 ;5 ;5 O 6 6 6 6 to :5 :a 'a 'a 'aI'vi-_ 'a I v k :a :6 � r c 'o 'a °Jcwo'o1a 0 JJ -1 J1 J U .J JJvJ -� -+--'r J-1J r 1 1 i j > O1 i N d N ° �_ L y Q1 O Qi C Qi C �_ •L O 07 Q) 3 t0 r ?y O U O •i O o O L` O Ol Q L d c> O L t6 L i OC d U C J J J Ofl c c O ? C L L C t0 —L N O c 3 t6 V` O J Q! C c R t y C 'a U>° •C OG U 'O L N m J ca i cti c. 0! > Q QI >> d QY 3 O L (U O m > 0 J L N a >` 7 o 'L o O D L 'L } d> J p 0 U >• L C a� � �. d > Q >� Ql ow O 3 N co w G C >` O x YO O1 C C `� L y C c y C L C L C L O 0J Ln y .a QI U c QI 'C O Ol C L Qi C� O C L L°> C� O i Cc O a �mm`oomW6z, to y 1`v c Q �(iNLiLi o c x S x llLnmNxx�ox>�W= m x aci = m ? `L° � Wmmo�= `—°" i In 0 00 ei 1 i M O 00 O N M i1 O 61 M 'd' N M O O N m N O 8 O et f.0 M M 00 t6 q 0 0 00 N NO 00 t0 e -t 00 N t6 e•i h N � N � O 0 M N Ln 14 N 0 N OM1 N 00 61 C 0000 cO1' d N Ln O. aN-1 N N O0 � rqr-I w N N ton 0. N N q N ao-1 to e4 M r1i I i O) � �; i j � i •0 O QI Y c O t9 11 I i 'C C N@ ! C t d! Y i A O I C m m a :V Ip ! +, C N = OJ —r W 'd L C j0 m 'O .0 " cL C cn O U -8 W C •II O 4) U m 'O i� y m 'O � N O~ C m C O c c C m O m m E 1 '8 +' t0 r y 10 O C ._ C C Qt O C° i� i+ Qi Oy .X d Lp i+ l0 C> E L� ° (0 t0 E L 5 C° N O � L L C N> i !s to o; °^ Z=azo-,was-,�1z�>� o `° `o m E ° m v_ o a� o—c�-°°,t°t°o3mu> °J'�i�o3� f 00 1 s� O In 3 0 ! '^ N L f0 a E t0 E o m 4 O L0 `° k C E •C N E 'G ' Ta y v L y y L }~+ 'L 'i. OL m Y m U Qi !0 f7 L •y +4)+ > N n E �+ 61 Q) W= O O O G1 O � G1 O 01 O G d O I t O Q Q L 3 D t0 >• O d >• O Q) .O W t W Q! >> W Ol W L c0 tL Y QI LL c c L L Ii.; W LL U. i0 t9 i6 0 i6 t0 c0 (D 0 Q( t0 1 to Q! C9 Q C7 C7 U` C'J (7 U U' C7 ' iii � ! ►i��;�,ti ii,�,�� r , , i d MNoOd O t6 O N I��N��OnOd�eM-iO� 8 a -t 00 Ln�n Ln0000��Qn1�tMCLn 1 0o u1 � � n ao ri � � � � O V\ to �00 Mtf t11i r1 (D IO 1 i 1n O1 00 (D pi 00 00 '1 e•1 I� t\ C1 N t0 to fV d1 N N 01 � N u1 C� 15 M q ri (P� q 1� OV NV d O dcli N• I do 00 dN 000 4 C%l OV 61 NC dN' � dN C4 CN N dN d� VO tM0 N N N N N dN dN dN etN et d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Ln Ln N N; N N N Ln Ln N N N vi N N N N Ln Ln In N N Ln In Ln Ln N1 00i ON1 001 O01 C0i G01 QNl 001 C01 ON1 Q�1 Chi Q�1 001 Ln QNj j pNj G0i G01 m CA IM 001 G�1 601 cn Im t cn (n cn cn m G001 u t6 VQ'u,�VVV;5I�V��3�V��V 1 c r i 0 I I i f j ; C o I C i I { p f Ipi o' 0 0J0J0Jp =�' j �JooJ6�oJo�Ja�ao J N":c=—='o 0 0 J J J J J J 0 N0 J J J i I -o f0 C I r+ t R i O) a i V Qj i I. m C L L C` C i J E Op n d 7 p N N C 'i V L N O) C c .mJ Ol �, > .L m U, stVt. OJ •Z G Ol J CV 1 U V @ .0 n s < J Ol C O > to C 01 O C p �' o O Y R> J L p C J C R L Q C R 00 L Lnn a-1 M L C? f0 N 0) n L ea m= �i to 0) t �. ti' t�. O C _ L- L L C L /0 i0 0) �- N ` C tf1 lQ V•' W U t U O 0) > L 0) L L O) 0) Q 00 00 L Y t0 Ol = N 00 L C e-1 p d V- O Y tl) O 01 c0 J O L CO 00 C C w O •C L 0) C N cw Q) y -a O Y e C R Q a> C ton m �' e _>= N x Z N C v is 7" ti 0 ao._��c N 'L. a��m O p pp 0 m coJ= Z 3 N 0 0 (� 3 cL6 O m ui� c°��,n�4 t� UJ00coa 00 N In 1p Mu'O G N N N m 00 N N p Mppp e4 e1 f� ONO Q G O d' 1� 00 00 O Ln tdfl r -I ^ t O tm6 u01 6M1 W N O 00 C4 r N e•1 N e �ctn' NOfOm f3. N N 1\ fmYl N 0 OMO O to �!' af' N N 4 00 N d ei d 4 .•a N N N 00 N a� CL N N N tD ri et• N I 'I � I I d I I C { I N c .Q ( al 0 C tJ I , L I t a� m a� a°�i c � C I T C •L s v. YU C � N W L g L U 0) V W y� U -i= Z -C �Cp ^J. <C 10 N U •(U m 3 y a t6 C y V N C "� t0 C 'C C f0 C 'p C t6 R U C R C f6 "C lC0 'O E t6 L C m C N O td -Li N C N t V C CQ N f0 W Ol S1 N Y V= R f0 f0 01 Q) 'C .Q E i N E y m t0 C t0 f0 C R f+ y O 0 Q3 N C C L 0) > I �• Y i >L Y U f6 'C N R V L R O @ O p O_ L E r- O) L 0) R y O �? +O+ p p `6 s° =2 °� mwc LL.Md- c�nm��3nemnndvinzvl-,i=�u i I i 1; , ! I it fFs O L l iI I �, 0) 1 C L�� ' wa r--0 Jid C 0) N@ i N N >.' 0l N m V y Ol •;` C O O y a) C C '4+ y� _.. 'a O N C y O L t0 y bA tl0 to C _ 3 C C i v Y t0 .O C C_ SCI Q1 OI O1 QI N Ci V O O L �L i 7 3 �0 fO :0 m m m IO :O f0 <0 t0 �0 m :O :0 01 _ _ ,OR V V 4 (D !!L^^ V (9 1�4^^ (D (M � � .T. I II �ilti 6661 a5�s� j►JJ JIJ o�ol000joJoo ao--a 1:5 JJ; ,o�oojo'oJ1:5.113hall J1pJJJoJ Jaoo J�JI��J�JIJ d _ L c d d d m I N d V ; O O y > d j> d c c O O T d do a� L>>7 ca o�L �a`3>>� m d L o d> p •L L c -� p c p p J •G •L -c > —� m c •C d p �'' •a tC 'a d Q 'a T T V f0 •L p c > -a p > > d o T d O p d c y ?�, p= d ca u l op w $ a v m o V <b i p L= y `-° _ a p = d L. c 3 °� a qC C� c= 3 =e �° 3 eo 0 o d= eC ° o to o. o o �. y OCO y 'C L Cd1 0 a J d d= S '�+ i 2= > 2 p O y t0 O LO. v1 5 a> O to N U (D U 3 O N 000 T-1 a 4 000 W 0�1 tp0 n N 00 n 'S n et N w "' tp M a -i rt MO to N M m t0 O O r•1 M M O O d' O N O m to n N V' M M t!1 M t[ N O M N n CF M. �0 r'1 t!1 M M N M n to n vv N 01 O to M M u1 M N l0 a-1 d' t!1 Ol N a -i t!1 �!' N Ln Ln t!1 N N e•1 CC O O n Ol M N e1• M rI M N t0 N t!1 r1 N a-1 N N rt d' N N e•1 CO N t-1 t"1 N N rl ei N N ti n N M n n N t0 N N .�� '= > C) y d I y 'iC L Q am I I e7 i Q > y coo c Ja 0 c I = d a -a d ea eo — ea I O d l O f0 'G d N 'C tC c�C C) C c d= 3 d c= d y ( O 'O d ^ R = L t6 U E _ >• Z' t6 L C .G - = c '�-_' U O c d v C a .� = y m yOj V T d O O d i o fC O T '' gpcoCL ,pocap m�o�Tc��iylU_�ooUp mmII.--Inco J�3�3 �° I I = I Y .0 ` Y X ]G Y Y Y ]C ]G mn +°n°�°n° c �� ^ n m N o0 n N M d i N O CO d d�nlr. rnoMo� I n nn N m n�ICOnrn mNf�nr U L O t0nrlr+no J N J J N n N N N I�10 N N N N NIN N N N N r14C140 N N lV N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N 0 CS N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N� N N N N N N N LA N 1 AIR In Ln N Ln Lrm I GN1 Owl OM1 QN1 C�1 6�1 O�1 ON1 OM1 G�1 GM1 C�1 ON1 OM1 ON1 m OM1 ON1 G�1 Obi OM1 101 101 ON1 Q�11 OM1, C�1 O�1 0A1 O�1 cr O�1 101 6661 a5�s� j►JJ JIJ o�ol000joJoo ao--a 1:5 JJ; ,o�oojo'oJ1:5.113hall J1pJJJoJ Jaoo J�JI��J�JIJ d _ L c d d d m I N d V ; O O y > d j> d c c O O T d do a� L>>7 ca o�L �a`3>>� m d L o d> p •L L c -� p c p p J •G •L -c > —� m c •C d p �'' •a tC 'a d Q 'a T T V f0 •L p c > -a p > > d o T d O p d c y ?�, p= d ca u l op w $ a v m o V <b i p L= y `-° _ a p = d L. c 3 °� a qC C� c= 3 =e �° 3 eo 0 o d= eC ° o to o. o o �. y OCO y 'C L Cd1 0 a J d d= S '�+ i 2= > 2 p O y t0 O LO. v1 5 a> O to N U (D U 3 O N 000 T-1 a 4 000 W 0�1 tp0 n N 00 n 'S n et N w "' tp M a -i rt MO to N M m t0 O O r•1 M M O O d' O N O m to n N V' M M t!1 M t[ N O M N n CF M. �0 r'1 t!1 M M N M n to n vv N 01 O to M M u1 M N l0 a-1 d' t!1 Ol N a -i t!1 �!' N Ln Ln t!1 N N e•1 CC O O n Ol M N e1• M rI M N t0 N t!1 r1 N a-1 N N rt d' N N e•1 CO N t-1 t"1 N N rl ei N N ti n N M n n N t0 N N .�� '= > C) y d I y 'iC L Q am I I e7 i Q > y coo c Ja 0 c I = d a -a d ea eo — ea I O d l O f0 'G d N 'C tC c�C C) C c d= 3 d c= d y ( O 'O d ^ R = L t6 U E _ >• Z' t6 L C .G - = c '�-_' U O c d v C a .� = y m yOj V T d O O d i o fC O T '' gpcoCL ,pocap m�o�Tc��iylU_�ooUp mmII.--Inco J�3�3 �° I I = I Y .0 ` Y X ]G Y Y Y ]C ]G I 1 I ,iii I I, I ' I!�lilli 'I I c L t p +Y+ m eC I Cl v upi V m L d e`C U L O •3 J J J J J -! I 1 I ,iii I I, I ' I!�lilli 'I I T n O 00 [Y Ol N d1 V M uM� N ei d' d1 00 1� M CP O M rl O VI V• M Co a�-tTI M0{ n N e 1 uhf eMi a�-i n m a�-1 I�� n n 1\ C01 C P 000 n a�-i O rn1n�gPrnooghrn?R`fi�? c,+�`� °'°°e� q �4 ^�q'fi5��.-i dLn N d0' d0 Nv C QN d0 d0 dN v VN Nv v dN dN d0 Nv dN v C LSA in Ln Ln 1I 1 N cq Ln 19n N 1N11 LN(1 LNf1 LNl1 1NJ1 LN/} N INft N V�1 lNf) N tl1 tN[1 tNf1 lNl1 tell INl1 1NA V1 tNl1 tNl1 N (A ora,rnmo,mc,mo,rno,a�Imrna�v�o,rnrnrnrnc,o,c,a,rno,rnrnc,o,o�rno,rnOlrn , 5jg� ��_6��U;56661. ��5 'llllii I; a; �. , It >a n 'Cf Oafl R 0I-Ono, 1!0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0k -O, 0 00JJJ JJ J J J -1 J J J J ..1J J J> JJ J J J Or J ..� J J J JIJ Ln Ca a�ai eTo aac ` i f6 •% a 0 a C L T ` C C '> u t6 a f0 L •O N C G/ 'O L_ J 0 U .` J Q 0 3 C! T a U J> 0 U C C �.% i 'C 'i%j f0 L O O u Q a 0 VI U DO DTO o0o ai'n'y $ m cA o03doc 'Sm z=oy t0 a a a 00 u o �• C a a °J L00 ° L 'L° "'' a`i Tao a O dO T J a Y� 3 G o��o'0�zcocaam �-0 of a3Ham°so�m3c��°'moo x vx LU•-- y—S Q 0 r0 _ o L '> o?�m�OV�o.�x 'a(D X .� o o u? �ui3m w� ae>Uca�a 2°° >r U.. L, r, r,wNa rnaornN�n NMm� Q p p aN-1 dN' dM' N{�}} O 0�0 QM1 Lq tNf1 N N G01 O Ln 1011 M 0pp O in N d0' IOA 'Ln N dam• tNl1 � N O 00 � 4'1 01 d 00 1� t N N N e-1 N' t• N. N CS' N N N ei N a 4 N N N N ei N N d I f0` a •L y s `'° = v . nq T a p _ a t0 C R s > ` C p C N Z d N 00 f6 47 p T u m OU1 }= 0 Vf u C m C. d L H O a N Ot Y -C CL OA .a a (D a -, o m 'C QO R 'a t0 c�a O 'II x m C C T O= y T mc +e mco a $ oN m _ � L n_a� =YO �a 0 Go �i0 `O._tO'a m E oC of cc 10 _ I ° a a c o4-`0 Ot0 t0 OD 3 a 7 C.1 O L C a O m¢m mi E 41 Cm m m 100 (DOTi C� CO CO eO CO e C7 1v eOoG C G CG G GGGGcG�LGG2Gc a a i i 11.et n N al n ao In of m n c•1 d o0000o N Im cn Ln oo n er cn n �r.-i m unin Zo ao �o`'lonon t°-+uooin�n n�a�op oQnoon�jn r1 .y erne �no�oonnclNN� nnnncZa,1 not Nm M N N 4 N O N O M N O o N C3 M N N d C� 00 N N O N N O N N pp 0 0 N N d d et d' cl st 6 A� et d d�� N� ci d et � d N C d d et d�� d �! d et c•1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N M 1A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 1A 111 111 to 1l1 1A ul to 111 M to 111 111 t11 111 C1 M t11 u1 N 1!1 t11 11! L(1 Ln 111 t11 1r1 111to M to N M C1 G1 01 Ln 01 01 O1 C1 un 6t 01 G1 C1 01 00 01 01 01 01 Q4. C1 O 01 G1 1 G1 Gl D1 Gl 01 O1 G1 C1 01 01 01 01 U U U li U t.S CS' f� lS U v v Z C3 t3 Ci C) U 66 C3 t3 U Ci (J (3 U C1 CaJ Cf U to 0 4 I i iL I j I "O -_+ 'OO 6O -0O ._0O ._0O I .'_8O ..OO. O�' .J_C I.II_ •L -t 3O va :a0 a0 :O0 :a0 a0C >7 a O a a a j J C.. -p p O C vO-j J +1O J J O {m/J ilaomao- OLP- 3 Z 1% 0 o T m U a. 0 3 3 u 'L N = v m 3 a1 v o L = L=* L L _ U 'a ? U !6 y J U t J U •= p Ny •O N H U O O> Q O O L J Vl O O T a!O t6 O p v i O d 61 b0 a d T p M O w L G7 U U N= x 0= U T 111 y U _ _ .= N R L Oj U L� N C d '- U N C V }� u= U N O= O 01 11D 4� 3 C L tll G '= T T= O 10 = m T= d L n w L O= __ 'C C 4J e-1 N O O '' T L p = O L t6 = t6 td ,n 4J O @ �? i° __ u° y n x x U c.� z=�pp a� y T 3 o a= x o 3 3 c� 3 x s> W x N m V O O O'S x O O O g gm �Ln �u; 00000�n�v ao�cVui�� Zoo0 C,vr4 in nd oov N N Q�'1 lO N N C N N n to N N eM-I N 0- em'1 N dam" M N N N N 14 N N N i -I M _ _ 1 ! t I 0 'O O d 0p3p LCN Of0_ N/1�ZG! a 0= C O3 Ny.G� 0 == CN —VT w OC O a: DO OC�ad d Ci Co 1a oOo V1 N La cc •cc 3 JA ! 'a 'C w O '� 'C w J "O C c t = 16 'Lf = Z �¢ = f0 1p 'a c0 t6 •Occ f=6 = 10 = = m p 'O O _ R 't'j L d1 1C fQ = ._ m (6 .= O1 d O �o Gl Ip L i �+ O 1n = �! .0 L l0 dL '� p v f6 3 L a a Y h MIA 5 ac J U J w a v1 x X c��a f6 ! t I 0 'O O d 0p3p LCN Of0_ N/1�ZG! a 0= C O3 Ny.G� 0 == CN —VT w OC O a: DO OC�ad d Ci Co 1a oOo V1 N I pp 01 O !� a -t 00 M n n N n O O �t et t0 d N e! U1 ; 00 N e-{ to M d• 01 I epi c�-1 O t0 � aM-I O 01 Q a -i 01 Im a'i 01 m �' tt1 do M to �-1 00 O N M 00 N O 01 to d• M t1' j I ^ c' ri 1� f� ei t� � O �f1 �I u1 8 •-t tf1 Vf N O u1 ei . M to 01 1� d O1 01 o a1 a1 rn n o1 n n o1 1 n ^ `�` `f a0 `� aP `? , • N j 00 N N N O N Q a N O N N d dN dN cMl dN dN dN NV N� dN C I O R ct d tt d e! �i d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N tr1 N M ttt u1 to 111 tf1 lf1 111 V1 Ln tf1 tl) 1J1 to t11 t!'1 tlf N N M 1A Ln ll) LfI N tl1 N N tf'1 t!1 01 01 01 Ol Q) Ot 01 Ot O) 01 01 01 01 m 01 Ol 01 Ol 01 01 Q1 01 01[ 01 01 01101 01 O1i01 Q1 01 O1 01 01 O1 01 �166�616116 ��56 �6 �Cas�56S�;t66666�66665 E -a�va8�a-a'eaa=aaoo'-ao O O O O O O� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ++ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J N —� J J J J J JIJ J J J J J J J J J J J( I i rl f a, v > v aoi L o ar > > 0 3+ N ar� �c c3—c°Ji ar. Q) a) ar U O O c > d d 0 .L OC c N L a) c `' E c f0 L > C c d L c V f6 L= L al > 3 O N - inO L ar a) y> J E 0 E J `J° td U J U T d `� 3 ar m p c $ c o ed �� e-1 to L n 'c >, 'a tpA `- J 'a >, d y> cg c -' o O p H 3 o s ar o a a oar O c T> L o c co d �j. >, ._ c d ons t c v- E d O `� T -OQ ar ar d O O L U L L i N ar Li ar cr O ei �1 0 0 t r O s p Y s. 0 Y C 'C c L L L dO W L Q) L fO c Y O L 1C y y N 1! o d L fO X22 C :°x smlo °S>a `,°C7 W JO pN �ma�LLi3=mm pp 'S O O 'S O Q W W N N W COJ O O Lj N N e�.i IMf1 ISA n tOD IMA tOl1 Q00 N N N M LU fn N 10,00 0 NOd' 0 N1 �V aM0 p1 tp dam' OM1 N I cr4 10 -110hi aMi t�0 a0 -i N e�'i a0 -i N a�-I tMl1 eMi N N C. eMi N N N t��t N OMO N �NN N I ( u0._ N r4 >>> bA i s- C _ c 'f:.. 13 'O N mL' - �° O Vyl too r c f0 % N 3 w O. o E y, IJJ d a7+ r E v v t0 -00 C .t f6 c T i L m o on c� s �O R _! E C C E E p t6 c .4: �0+ ar J 3 R t6 f6 O f0 C to W c Vl c O O a3 00 V1 � N .a = I N to -O N 1L/1 N V�1 V1 M N tN L N N -moi ar 'O J c N -a 'C H IC 'O c Q C � Q 'O t6 OI O c C J N .6 c N 40 O R V c 'C O O N L a O N C N O R 'Cl O O 'O c R m '6 O N a N om-, C 4i c O ar m t R '+ 3 O Io �a s ♦�, d O M` d �_ O .Q c0 t N N E O ��0o ry 3 O> U 10 4l c % QT1 rG �+ O E_ V' - L .i Y 7 N O ar d E f6 ar 3 N 3 G N 16 u. Y l0 S ea Z O nL Q t0 S LL O Z Vf O Q -� N -+ W V1 p Q o J� O J LL -� --� m In , u0._ N r4 >>> 1O s- O c M 'O o - �° O E can too ar al O Y L N 3 w O. o E E c CL H o ar E v v C -00 C -po C�pa :° C�pp T o L ° O R o on s° •� s �O R s N 'O E C C E E p p c .4: �0+ 'N 3 R t6 f6 t6 �" t0 t 0 �'�' N c Vl C N N V1 � N c��0a Vl .0 N N N to to N 1L/1 N V�1 V1 N tN <A N N N V1 N V1 N N N F" H H VO! d N �t1 00 61 N 01 i, 1, of M Tq � an u1 00 0D et Os �t t0 ICT tO n O M ei oor�11 �d N N v N osm00in`n�^�o°°on N N N N OQO N A N O �1 N N N N N N N O Ln m to O G1 OIICI to 01 cn too M O1 O1 to m u1 u1 u1 tr (Mn C1 Cl 01 T 0 { QQ QQ is V' V QQ V QQ V Ci QQ QQ dQ V V QQ QQ Q QQ 4 V V �✓ �.S v L i L i 'xi's 0�6i3=a SZ J NO J J J J J 1 >. O L L V N >_ N G L d N > � O c e> O L •L C �p d C f6 0 0O 'O O� L t O M.N •O 3 r g t6 O v > '8 = tL6 lx U L N ojm S5 W 0 °_ S ui vi m im C14 two N N O N N N O Lo N� 0 u1 M N 0 1 N N N �^-I M Cb a a0 -f r�'I t i w { I ea La W d GJ O O C m a J E dC {� A M N N y N m f=0 lid f6 R 'i O C ommom�.°1coom�°a a C M y C i0 = a (D crU-I-- i L +. yy> O Q IV 0 -+ O nn u c FFLHf30>»»»> lv L O C O L L L { { i i Tn,� n, I 3° Co NIhM oQ C7 N Ip� NM4�OOm1vvd vONINf1 (f1 O1 M 01 01 D1 41 01 01 Q� O1 01 Ol M O1 O1 M 41 d1 d1 d1 61 C31 CP 01 61 M C1 d1 O� M O1 01 C71 01 I6 6 6 66666<6666665 5366U j JO $ p 6O O OV� D v 0 �� OO O .� U 0 'Ja'CJO C 'JO YNO a OOO °py 0 J J 0 0 0 J JO O OJ J JO J h V) ¢¢;% O JOJOJ O N Ln I I N m m H Y S N f6 f00 <A 0 C9 CJ N 3 d; Y m c c 0 Y CO) C p O ego m C C C SLG CC y�_` Cl C 'L i> O C O J CY) d �7 J y 2' f0 ` 0.°' L v C6 V C �+ >� L i �C C Y O ,C I� t6 Y V) d y M O O Cil d N C� N a UYYhh eC LH U m °1 mNoO-� ai33�y Q J 0 n eC •. R ¢ �C �- N M C11 41 J cp d �' d c0 E M C A O 3 n CC E O 'C O. U .O e6 Ln M O co h= m C O ei 'O N N Y a o•M-i CY`�p oma - o� E Ems.-+ �Ma2� x 'c. F- xQ x x ;i L R x ty 00 �'i y m .0 W w o 0 V1 p v) Z O O O ?y O O �0°H�m�3�'�yv�mm-)��'33m°°zoo3a�'omC°omoN33m3mm�c�c�m� pp Ln00000mpo�oo�'m0o0O"�mo pp N Ln N 6 m h M N M M O O M M 0 Q ei N Cb ei M t0 M N O h O p rq N LA e C O COO M n DD N N 00 eel Ln N 0. T4 CO eel i -I N t0 'd' N m M O. C M h N N eel c-1 LL rl e-1 N T CY e -i 0. 0. ei rl ei l6 !O d N O = f6 [C fr i m = d I a ��a ono I -p m e c -a y E I O C m m RS C 'O >` y 'O O -- =� p V N [6 CU C C) O d = C ` A t ap''+L- X C •0 7 y V C t6 C6 3 3 y d 0 d L Y 0 O O> ! L U O Qt Cl C6 L f0 C O N C7 G 1: mm V' - a W —� N O N •-� CC S U O li -� F L j i Ito do Ear�'' O tl0 40 d E d4 tW t L C C Y C O O O '� y E H eLo y d N O v N is 7 N 3 E O C ►' = V 0. D M V U U G 33331 >°}}N¢pmwam�mv►¢xmmac) a I U L 1 E U i off, I CL wN im -m E aa)i a a 0 U U I I I Y `�' c0 U 1=0 ° •O 1 E a �*' E° Sv �oaaa T E E I Y m e aEi l 0 3 aEi 1 I o a a Q ° m m R O' _ E 3 v) LL LL u. y °)°�O� d m�� xv<n�w -� °a YAW `Y°;°:° m i E L1 _ 'O Ll 0 C)� W f6!� C1 O U C C f6 y y y E L y y J tvC3 W C) O O O O C,OI41 O O¢ O vii m c_p 1 O I CO 3 C fC — w i ! L Ew. '� U m 1: y C O yy o?S o2. U. C� y- LL U. LL i i Q Q Q m m, m Lp m i �+ �j i ! IN 00 00 00 y m IMI 01�NIN 00i� o C O N n n N r4 M a N N N er N O p O v N �-1 �' M' a• d' O w a• O O O O O A A d• d' M O CF st et' a' N N N N tV N N M N N N N N N N N N N 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 00 to y Lf! M y t/1 tl1 y tI1 y t!1 N u1 YY L!1 U f ut y Ul y In y y y y U 1 N LA y tl1 N LIi U 1 tlI M y tr1 C1 C1 Q1 01 01 y o O1 01 Ot d1 Ol 01 01 O1 01 Cl m C1 01 0 01 01 01 Q1 Cl Gl y 01 Gl Ol 01 Ol 01 01 Ot G1 I0�0C10L0C Y 0 0 0 0 XR 0 0 0 hi °'ox o o oryy yy =JyOr y a J J0 Jo0 =Ja0 I =Jo0 'Ja0 i i0aJ oJ 30 •• N I ( o i � � N M O O I m 0l i I N N i m a0+ M y Q y I 0) ¢ O ?• ,O i I I 0J O y M 3 O) O N IO N 3 m m crit c c = .-� 0=i 3 .>_ Z y cc Ori a 0 .0ri ari ari ari Ori a� ''� " �. d m 'a Y 7 0 O J J 01 > c L �- 0j O �! t6 = ^ 0) yr Q 01 a C! = CG y Y +L+ aL+ sL+ • r .Lr r r •i *- ++ 'N a'' O CG p. > H o O c V +' L> 'O 'O t0 O 0i y 1/f y y y y y J y y N y y y c a O On Y 0) L L y M Ol Q== J H l 4! 0) w N o d E 01 0i 0) C C O H p y "41 v o y% `° R c y a a g== c G c e0 _= F- vOi 1 e -t rc N s Lu G f0 1'� o y y E x = d G. G. O. d G. S O. G. LU d > > i z x x x x Z g x O Z x o R u vi ui u3 3 LL o��omcoSO.2 4,�3u;oo33�3viin w C4 N oc°„`�'333333�'S333,n�nu�o Wt I I N D. L1.1 �- C_ M M N N M �- ^ N 4 N M N N N N N 114 e-1Inf- o N N N M M N- { ! I m m I I ccv c=6 1I(iI _ N a00 E E i I I o =Q oQ tca c O cC 0 I U��,��o-Qa L 2 m a o >' 3 E ;' E 0 0 0 0 j 00i „ 0 m m 0 O d7 L °J O U aci -�aLaLvt¢ccH��=°a`C7Y-Oin`.v�IC-aocSSSS _ a�=i '� m c �. 0 0>i ��•0 �+ �r m °;c7�So'SaQl!��e �j - U El 1�vl�� d) d N 0 fm0 C21 I lco JI = I� =I m 0fa0,,��3t0meo ! U1 'i a 01 ' >, y O y N E Y O us Y V = H __ Y f0 O _ 'O dof L >' O! .= O 01 '7E >Y •% I -C-1 UX00090 p r0 c m a0' to L e6 CI¢ S � m+ eC � d � N u = N Ct m= a o-, e0 P � �owCcm y S U C E t = a1 E uri crn E y—Z E 1 GD�%J yO U' a+ i y 0 0 cu �' Y L t (� t u N o v '0 'u 't3 i 0.10 0 v� O r rc03 0 0 u E�Z o n 00 ouu ua > c0 O c pO( ZZ2 -i-� a0'aX53 �.- 14 = 0-o°o� oI JI --'J'JJj'oJ'aJ$$ J J J Y Y XI iJ co J• J 4 a 1I(iI _ N a00 E E I I o c c O cC c I U��,��o-Qa E E E I i j Q¢ i mO 0kv QI O d7 L °J O U (, O I I �. CIS ��•0 �+ �r m U El 1�vl�� d) d N 0 fm0 C21 lco JI = I� =I m 0fa0,,��3t0meo E t = a1 E uri crn E y—Z E 1 GD�%J yO U' a+ i y 0 0 cu �' Y L t (� t u N o v '0 'u 't3 i 0.10 0 v� O r rc03 0 0 u E�Z o n 00 ouu ua > c0 O c pO( ZZ2 -i-� a0'aX53 �.- 14 = 0-o°o� oI JI --'J'JJj'oJ'aJ$$ J J J Y Y XI iJ co J• J 4 M t i► jI Ql 0 M C^1 ! t0 C1 d I d Q O I Q 10 r►'t-It' 0, o0 ri M M 00 ri N N N �O N M M M O O O O N eq O O N NI�{u�id I� 01 v O tG�M O O �"� .i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t�11 M t1 tNff dM' ! N I N. V1 IN(1� tNlS lNl1 tMf1 N Ln tNl1 tNl1 N tNA tNlf LNl1 lNl1 tNl1 N INl1 lNfl tNf'1 LNf1 tNl1 lNf1 INA LNl1 IN1) lNl1 NA tNl1 tNf1 01 Gl 01 G1,C1�01 , - O1 01 01 01 m Q G1 m 01 01 G1 Q M 01 O: d1 01 Gl Cil Ol 01 G1 Ol 01 61 Cl 01 01 01 i ►T I f i { i ;51 66��3��6666666 ��666666 CL CL 0 0 l! ! E I I' OO7�I O O vGvO CuO CouO UL iJ Ud a00+ .i0,, sc0.� c0 0 O O I$�°C' c +O -•r ° 0Oo0�o000000YV Y uEoE, +O U YOO O ONNN ;N� � jjN 6nNn N O noVdN x -' J J N N V1 I i O M I i I N VI M U:m N > a+ O d Q j i N 1�/f = N d GOl 3 0 y CC fL j 7 O i 3 O NC O i CA N N N j H t0 'H W 0) •% C� d' Z U U Q Q C C W .Q C t6 00 m +' Ti c N i+ 00 C Ln N O L a 00 O R A A Q Q d N N Op Op 0 �j O O yyya E R M i n 1MA O `0 N 000 -Oi -Oi O V^ aD o0 s .0 Z O O N N Ol c r- y V1 0 t0 rl t"1 w C Q m O vl rL, L U V. d o �'i 00 N 00 c1 ei C c W c X X u u u X X> RS =