HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 7, 2011 C-15AGENDA ITEM Ce -1 1;
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution Amending Traffic Resolution No. 97-148 by Approving a
35 -Miles -Per -Hour Speed Limit on Reynolds Ranch Parkway from Highway 99
Frontage Road to Harney Lane
MEETING DATE: September 7, 2011
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolution amending Traffic Resolution No. 97-148 by
approving a 35 -miles -per -hour speed limit on Reynolds Ranch
Parkway from Highway 99 Frontage Road to Harney Lane.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Reynolds Ranch Parkway is a recently -constructed roadway. As
such, accident history does not exist, and since the area is not fully
developed, traffic volumes are estimated to reflect future conditions.
Based on these factors, staff will continue to monitor the roadway in the event modifications are
necessary. However, based on the data available at this time, staff recommends a 35 -miles -per -hour
speed limit on Reynolds Ranch Parkway from Highway 99 Frontage Road to Harney Lane (Exhibit A).
Curve warning signs and 30 -miles -per -hour advisory speed signs will be installed at both curves in the
roadway. A•map showing speed limits on all surveyed streets within the City is attached as Exhibit B.
FISCAL IMPACT: Normal maintenance only.
FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable as sign installation costs were included with roadway
construction.
A.", J'A"VC�
F. Wally S delin
Public Works Director
Prepared by Rick S. Kiriu, Senior Engineering Technician
FWS/RSK
Attachments
cc: City Attorney
Police Chief
Police Sergeant Jacobsen
Senior Civil Engineer Chang
WaterNVastewater Superintendent
Street Supervisor Watson
/_1Uu:Z60: 111111
radt Bartlam, City Manager
K:\WP\TRAFFIC\SPDZONE\CReynoldsRanchPkwy.doc
8/29/2011
ENGINEERING
9 -pp sga sao•
AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
i"""'°
�r
SEE NARRATIVE FOR
W1.2 �'�
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
W13.,(N R]•1(35) J LU
,
O W
Wt 2 0: 2
W-1
(30l �
Q
2
W4!
w1a+(3o)
S
is W*2
HN/Y 99 FRONTAGE
w+31(30)
�h
REYNOLDS RANCH PARKWAY
SPEED TABLE
ROADWAY WIDTH
NO. OF LANES
2 w/Bike Lane 3 w/Bike Lane
MEDIAN (TYPE)
RAISED CONIC
TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA
60 Act 60iAct 60JAct
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
7,000 (estimate) 17,000 (estimate)
OBS. SPEED—CRITICAL,85th% NB
43 41
S B
38 41
—PACE(%) NB
37 37
S B
34 36
—MEDIAN,50th% NE
30-40(66) 31-41(75)
SB
29-39(77) 30-40(72)
EXISTING SPEED ZONE
N/A
PROPOSED SPEED ZONE
35 mph
P
M H
SPEED GRAPH..LEGEND.
-SIGN LOCATION
......... _ _......................_.. �1.............
.....?...........?....?....?..._....._.... _..................
1 1 ............_._...._.._....._........ ......................i..1.
. ? 1
I ;
i I........._..........._..—_....................
..... .................... ...'. (LJ
. ....I ....:.......... .i...Y... ...............I.............(
( I' 1
g�t; ' e
RI -1 STOP SIGN
50....
.
I .
R2 -1 ( ) SPEED LBOSIGN MPH
... ... ... ... ..HT 1. .-...
.-:._:._;... ...«......«.»... . __.__.__, .j...,..»...:-.
:.
�...1_. ...i.... ... ....:............... ...
44. -.j- - --1-.L-44
RI -2 -YIELD SIGN
C -ASSEMBLY C
(SCHOOL 2S MPH SIGN)
4 0
...I...............I...I...I, i
. . t . , _
. _ �.. ., _ _ _
�_ _ _ _
.. .,.�.`-.a,. ... _ ....t ,...{_ ,....(...r... .... _
III !
_
-Y
_ ........... I i
_I....1..:..:. _. _...
tr d
i I
II....WI_.....I....{...5 ... ... ...............d... ...d._ _ ...i... ... ...
i
_
W13 1 -CURVE ADVISORY SPEED
L� �
f
.. I (
,..P
I !
1 (
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
30-
,..,_rte
_
- - y
_...µ....... ... ... ._ _. ...,_ -
-CITY LIMIT
?
- -CRITICAL SPEED
ER LI IT OF PACE
...'............................'.......:... ...
... ...I ? ?LO
i
i i i i
Ei_
.. a.. ... ... ....� _i.....1.... ......... ... ... .................!.._ ....�.... .... .... L...i...._.-i-... ..
, I !!!
!!!
ACCIDENT PLOT YR: 2009
I
N/A I N/A N/A
YR:2010
0 1 0 0
ACCIDENT RATE—ACC./MILL. VEH.—MI.
0.0 0.0 0.0
CH: RSK
�H,
Revision
PPr
gpproved By
CITY OF LODI
REYNOLDS RANCH PKWY
SPEED
flNDate
ZONE
L20
TR 162�taHon Mgr/Sr Traffic Engineer
oafs
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Hwy 99 Frontage to Harney
SURVEY
m
x
01
September 2011
SPEED ZONE REPORT — Reynolds Ranch Parkway, Highway 99 Frontage Road to
Harney Lane
REFERENCE - Speed zone surveys are performed in the City of Lodi following the
California MUTCD in accordance with Section 40802 (b) of the California Vehicle
Code.
STUDY CRITERIA - Important factors to consider in determining the speed limit
which is most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and that is
reasonably safe are:
Prevailing Speeds (85th Percentile Speeds) - Reasonable speed limits conform to
the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and by measuring motorists' speeds,
one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Speed
limits should normally be established at the nearest five mile per hour (mph)
increment to the 85th percentile speed. However, in matching existing conditions
with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate
the need for a further reduction of five mph.
Accidents - Accident records for two recent years were considered in determining
the speed zones. Accidents on segments of roadways are classified by their
accident rate. Accident rates are determined by the number of accidents occurring
within a segment of roadway and the traffic volume within that segment. Accident
rates are shown in accidents per million vehicle miles (ACC/MVM). The average
Citywide accident rate is 3.4 ACC/MVM.
Unexpected Conditions — Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily
apparent to the driver were considered. When roadside development results in
traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers,
speed limits below the 85th percentile may be justified.
Other Factors - The following factors were considered: residential density,
pedestrian & bicycle safety, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance,
superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile condition, intersection spacing and
offsets, commercial driveway characteristics and pedestrian traffic in the roadway
without sidewalks.
° STUDY RESULT
Four radar surveys were performed and the 85th percentile speeds ranged from 38
to 43 mph as shown below.
Street Segment
Hwy 99 Ftg to Le Baron Blvd.
Le Baron Blvd. to Harney Lane
Reynolds Ranch doc
Northbound Southbound
43 mph 38 mph
41 mph 41 mph
Highway 99 Frontage Road to Le Baron Boulevard
The 85t percentile speeds on this segment are 38 and 43 mph. The 50th percentile
speeds are 34 and 37 mph. There have been no accidents on this recently
constructed street segment. Based solely on 85% speeds, the speed limit on this
segment could be posted at 40 mph; however, based on bicycle and pedestrian
safety, we recommend establishing a 35 mph speed limit on this segment.
Le Baron Boulevard to Harney Lane
The 85t percentile speed on this segment is 41 mph. The 50th percentile speeds
are 36 and 37 mph. There have been no accidents on this recently constructed
street segment. Based solely on 85% speeds, the speed limit on this segment could
be posted at 40 mph; however, based on bicycle and pedestrian safety, we
recommend establishing a 35 mph speed limit on this segment.
CONCLUSION
The recommended speed limits are shown below:
Reynolds Ranch Pkwy Segment
Hwy 99 Ftg to Le Baron Blvd
Le Baron Blvd to Harney Lane
Paula J. Fernandez
Transportation Manager/Senior Traffic Engineer
Reynolds Ranch.doc
Posted Speed Limit
35 mph
35 mph
EXHIBIT B
POSTED
SPEED LIMITS
0
Z
Q
WID Conal
CITY LIMITS Q
o� w w Of CITY
3 LIMITS
35 Q m
o� 00 -C`a FILERS d
�5: 35 _
40 35 TURNER 40 1
5
0
1 Z30 0 <40)
30<3y0) (30> LJ �o�\\ U 30 35 35 PIONEER— �J m 40 45
Q 40af
LOCKEFORD
a
35 N
35 (25) 35 30 35 -(35?-
40
35 ELM 35}'
30 PINE ---- --- 25 _
�
25 VICTOR (HWY 12)
30 -----
30 30 25 35-
30 25 30 35 35 35 40
rn
--(40 40 LORI 30 35 o Q
Of
45 25 51
CD
U U
0TO
30 KAY
45 40
25
w HALE
< I
Of35 35 1
U) 35 VINE 30 VINE 1
0 30 a
40 z
35 35 40 m
w
0 z = z U w
J aY AUTO CENTER'
01 35 0
_ = o o'
U H _
(I N U
45 —^ KETTLEMAN 35 35 45
(HWY 12) cn
BRANDYWINE
U
30 40 35 ALMOND
�.J
45 45
CENTURY 4040 35 CENTURY
30 40 3
50 =
s
:J 35
y 30
F-
25 HARNEY 45
N Q =
�_ p JO z
0 Z
W
CL Of 35
U
*—NOT RADAR ENFORCEABLE REVISED. XXX 2011
LEGEND
NOTE: The speed limits shown on this map are STREET WITId SPEED ZONE
in miles per hour. The speed limit on streets (NON -LOCAL STREET)
within the City not shown on this map ore ' `r_ "LOCAL" STREET WITH
25 miles per hour. `J SPEED ZONE (VC 40802)
K:\UAIJlJkIKAffIU\bPCIIIM2U1U3• AAFFIC\SPDLIM2011.DWG
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-142
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 97-148 BY
APPROVING A 35 -MILES -PER -HOUR SPEED LIMIT
ON REYNOLDS RANCH PARKWAY FROM HIGHWAY
99 FRONTAGE ROAD TO HARNEY LANE
WHEREAS, Reynolds Ranch Parkway is a recently -constructed roadway. As
such, accident history does not exist, and since the area is not fully developed, traffic
volumes are estimated to reflect future conditions; and
WHEREAS, based on the data available at this time, staff recommends a
35 -miles -per -hour speed limit on Reynolds Ranch Parkway from Highway 99 Frontage
Road to Harney Lane.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby
approve a 35 -miles -per -hour speed limit on Reynolds Ranch Parkway from Highway 99
Frontage Road to Harney Lane; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthat the City of Lodi Traffic Resolution No. 97-148,
Section 7, "Speed Limits," is hereby amended to set the speed , limit on
Reynolds Ranch Parkway from Highway 99 Frontage Road to Harney Lane at 35 miles
per hour.
Dated: September 7, 2011
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2011-142 was passed and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held September 7, 2011, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hansen, Katzakian, Mounce, Nakanishi,
and Mayor Johnson
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS —None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS— None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS— None
&JOHL
City Clerk
2011-142