Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - July 15, 1992 (48)CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Consider certifyipg the City of Lodi's compliance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) of San Joaquin County for the period January 1, 1992 (date the CMP first went into effect) to June 30, 1992 MEETING DATE: July 15, 1992 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director ACTION: That the City Council consider certifying that the City of Lodi is in conformity with the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) of San Joaquin County. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On January 1, 1992, the San Joaquin County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) became operative for all jurisdictions in San Joaquin County. This state mandated program was adopted in an attempt to improve congestion on San Joaquin County's highways and major roads and also to improve air quality in the county. State law requires a CMP to be created and for local compliance with the CMP to be annually monitored. The program is linked to new gasoline tax revenues which local governments receive under the provisions of Propositions 111 and 105, approved by the voters in June 1990. Failure to comply with CMP requirements can jeopardize the City's share of these new revenues. The San Joaquin County CMP has a self -certification program to determine conformity with the CMP. Annually, each jurisdiction must fill out a check list and certify that they arc: in compliance. The check list must be accompanied by a Certification Statement adopted by the local jurisdiction's governing board, stating that to the best of its knowledge, the jurisdiction is conforming with the CMP. The annual monitoring to determin, compliance will take place in September of every year, with the compliance material due by July 31 eac: year. Because the CMP program went into effect on January 1, 1992, this first review will only cover the period from January 1, 1992 through June 30, 1992. The Community Development Department has determined the City is in compliance with the CMP and recommends that the City Council consider certifying the City's conformity. FUNDING: None required. James B. Schroeder Community Development Director JBS/cg Prepared by David Morimoto, Senior Planner APPROVED. THOMAS A. PETERSON City Manager CCCD92.14/TXTD.01C recycled paper CC -1 ci*flcatiou Stamone t .,..; 'This 19_ 92 self-catificadon was prepared by: (YOU) David Morimoto No= (209) 333-6711 Pbotss Nudes Community Development , City of Lodi Departraen, Jon BuM upon the cbcckjkt affi the s, staff is of tbe opinion that City of Lodi has cobmed to the requlkwwo of the July 8, 1992 O (Daft) The . has reviewed the comOsted cbsWist sad wyaZilm body) supportift I - ----OtitiOn and has fMd that the policies and ac dm of the jtuisdicdon as re- pocoed bersia COntply to the Mquiramenta for Mah n== wide the Coo#ndon Unagmum host f S= jo&gWn C=%y. Tit% City/County Cork 34-p November 26, 1991 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN Self -Certification Checklist Designated CMP System 1. Are there any principal arterial segments that might be considered for addition to the CMP regional transportation system? If yes, please add to the attached conformance documentation. M Level of Service Standards 2. Are all level of service calculations for principal arterial segments for which the jurisdiction is listed as "lead entity" (or which fall primarily within its jurisdiction) included in the attached'documenta tion? Yes. See attached A-1 and Table 1 3. Do any of these calculations indicate a LOIS below the standard before interregional travel has been removed? No. 4. Are all facility changes that may affect level of service calculations on the CMP system included in the attached documentation? N/A Transit Standards 5. Is all information verifying compliance with routing, frequency and coordination standards included in the attached documentation? No. Lodi currently meets the City's transit needs by providing general public dial -a -ride service. This service is available weekdays from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m, , and weekends from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p,.m, The service is available to the general public, although the majority of riders are elderly or handicapped certified. The average daily trip count for 1991 was 310 passengers. The City has recently received a Transit Needs and Assessment and Systems Plan done by a consultant. The City is in the process of evaluuting the report to determine the direction of future transit plans. The City will probably phase into a fixed -route bus system over a 4-6 year period. This will be done in conjunction with an expansion and modernization of the dial -a -ride system. Attached is a copy of the recommendations made by the transit report (attachment B-1). This will be the basis for future transit discussiuns. 6. Are there any standards that the jurisdiction is having difficulty complying with or believes that it should not be required to comply with? If so, explain in the attached documentation. Yes. Because the City of Lodi does not have a transit system other than dial -a -ride, it is difficult for the City to respond to many of the transit based standards. The City is currently studying expanded transit service for future years. 7. Have policies for facilities coordination, new/reconstructed streets and long-range transit needs been adopted by the jurisdiction as of June 30, 1992? Will implementation policies proceed according to a regular schedule after that date? No. The City has not adopted specific transit standards as of June 30, 1992. This is in large part due to the fact that the City has just recently received a draft of the "City jf Lodi Transit Needs Assessment and System Plan" report. Once this report is analyzed and discussed, the City will be in the position to adopt specific long-range transit standards. Once this is done, the City will also adopt a specific time table for implementation of the adopted policies. Land Use Analysis Program 8. Have all land use decisions requiring CMA review been submitted to the CMA as part of the loca! environmental review process? (e.g. General plan amendments with 1,000 or more additional average daily trips, general plan revisions, cumulative total of all general plan amendments). Yes. The City of Lodi has not processed any General Plan amendments that exceed the 1,000 or more additional AOT's threshold. 9. Have all significant impacts of the individual 1,000 additional trip general plan revisions been mitigated? Has documentation of the proposed mitigations and their estimated costs been submitted to the CMA? N/A. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Element 10. Is a description of all transportation control measures in place or underway included in the attached documentation? No. The City of Lodi is waiting for Transportation Control Measures (TCM) plan being prepared by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Once this plan is published and adopted, the City will adopt a trip reduction ordinance. Capital Improvement Program 11. Is a list of all projects requiring state Flexible Congestion Relief, Traffic System Management or Urban Commuter Rail funds included in the attached documentation? Jurisdictions may also wish to include projects applying for Transit Capital Improvement program funds on this list. No. No projects are currently being funded by this program. 12. Is a list of all projects on the CMP system that the jurisdiction believes wi 11 increase roadway capacity or person capacity (transit) included in the attached documentation? N/A. 13. Is the information in these project lists given in the Regional Transportation Program format, in priority order, with estimated costs and all proposed funding sources? N/A. Regional Model Analysis 14. Does the jurisdiction perform CMP forecasts the use o f the model? No. Deficiency Plans wish to use its own regional model to and analysis? If so, has the CMA approved 15. Has the CMA indicated that the juri diction must prepare a deficiency pInn for a current or projected level of service deficiency? If so, please list the segments(s) for which a plan was required and when the plans(s) were submitted to the CMA. Wem these required plans accepted by the CMA? If no, explain why. No. LOS Calc. Sheet AWT AWT A-1 Hutchins Street - Harney Lane to Kettleman Lane Use urban, two-way arterials, Group C S/Kettleman Lane 14,991 1992 Median AWT = 14991 LOS A (per Table 1) Lower Sacramento Road - Kettleman Lane to Turner Road Use urban, two-way arterials, Group B S/Vine Street 12,413 1992 Median AWT = 12,413 LOS B (per Table 1) Table 1 GMM;tA'M7 ''-I:Z 7 LEVEL NICE MAXI?--- -A VOLUMES FOR FL jRIDA S URBAN (5.000+, _%REPS -.hrabd for use rsom .Tarin,( 1989 dmmeh Deermbcr 19901 ' TWO-WAY ARTFSLIL,S FREEWAYS 742coupO.0 to 0.3 espabod menaetomss per emfet GAP 1 hritbfe udbrmaed mnemaver 300.000 and kedUg to or W"U 3 mired Pemarycayamemt buaess died&! oes/ Laos ls+ddSanoe sed 4.ddSs.� A B C D A 11 C O E 4 2jp= 42 00 aLIW WO 1. %300 2 Undsw. 11:00 L1004 !Seca Id.70D 17.400 a +1.700 64=0 91.600 110.700 119.000 4Dir. X800 31.900 '" 34= NOW a 31300 91.700 122=0 147.WO 138.:00 a Or. 4&404 40.100 40.700 YL4W W= 10 ai1.400 107.100 132. 0 184.300 194400 Croup 2 M76 to 1.5 4plabo d mmrmsoms per mrd CC-* 2 helm ureaasaf ars oses30.000 sed not to Gmup 1) Los/ taoss tswld3owme obid" taeid3seao A 13 C O E A S C O t 21laM. 9.000 MCC 14-500 11x0 la10D 4 2L4W 35000 47.200. 3d 61.100 4Dbt 20.000 29L7LD 3L= 32300 x000 a 3LI00 44300 70AW 81304 92.700 a 42800 aG 9120 113.700 122300 6t71r. 30 4&100 4a.7W 4KS- 31.200 C 10 33ZW 62.300 117'W 142200 132900 L Cel C IIA to 2.3 aomaad Uummo ms Per mrd A cam" 3 hnebtrc ago -mo .en" aemrN Lemur/ S temms tawdet3ow Duma fA"Qfs rem AS C D E A- a C D C 3'` 4 17.300 ==3 37.600 4&40D 4d60O 2 Und1w. - 10.200 11.= 14AW 11700 a 21600 34,304 3d300 SLOW 75200 401. - 22AW 28.700 32.7tb 31400 a 301,100 92700 73.100 90.700 77.300 a Dr. - 35.100 4&OW 47.904 34.700 j C.nmW D OA to 33 acp,sbe"d mmsm.eoeem P4 maid ONWWAY A TER1AL9 Laos/ Oro," D flare dims 3A 4pemboad Uterus co me W usW Omedd Lerolefaw In A- lar c D It t,e„m LridSeras. 2tl on -- 2=0 2&700- I140D A" 8 c D c 2mlw 30200 3=0 2 4800 Masao l"W IlLow >r some - - 40300 30.'100 - 3 - 14moo 22704 2&0.110 27300 y + - Iat+oo 311800 30..300 38.300 ,' GFMW zOA 1& 43 sip our" town"W esm pur faiei a tAmw a...Ostsae.+ .1Pl.lrad>•e...amo.P.rmiw a ohomd Lama/�ws teem Lw/d3mn s A" a". C• D ' t2= C. D t� I - a 300 2 - - I3=0 16.200 17.600 a Der. 3a30a 40.800 3 - - 20,000 218110 20.600 - 4 - 27.150 31300 MAW Gramm IF Ww m than 43 wvmdm d mom mummum per mdo C and nmtvmbn prnwwwwagasaritw>.emm L dtm ccof tsdettl assoreraom0m A Gfoe! T fnm m dams 43 n¢alrsd mtescoonm pQ nak 0 :mos/ sod eotesrbme pr=my cny dam W bu�aas Dwroed 140010(310"ms diammsdoteessdarsor430000p A� Br c- D t 3 w 10= 14.600 Lee LaemictSo "m S 4 Dr. - - - :900 SLIGO - - K' EI" C 0 E _ aDiv- - - k90D 49000 LI 2 - I0.900 [1600 I..7OD 3- - IfLOW 21900 2maw 4 - - 22404 34CO 31903 II GrwP G imwm Mom 4ryfmbrdl �rommms per>ew 3 and wls bpry coy samuat bommus C - ameotetd,.e...d.r..e.�3oaooa L L../ w Ceo4 G tfnw. deas+3 mbar mommul u par fmsls owed" tw,rdrrreo so and `0.e" prrry car a~ busesse mm ,r 11" C• O t 3t dteremtdurbmemt arra aesr 3040001 5 2treaty. _ lSIOO 1&400 st a - 4Da. - - - 2a300 31704 tae LraddSr.s a a ON. - - - 40.200 31300 A a- C 0 E 3 LII 2 - - 13.300 17300 tajo0 3 - - 24400 26 27.700 DIVfDED/WMIVM-ED AMMSTMENTS 4 - - 27.aW -m 37.100 L (altar eerrvapormMg two -ay userW vehauat temrafod.Pereead - Lns Mamas tcm'Ran awfo Aditr.er t Facmr iw0-WAT COLLECTORS AND LOCAL STREETS (ataP:atrmed Louroccoon anaryoaaa 1- 2 DWded Yes - 3se Leea t.C.Act a� 2 Undy" ISMea A 8" C D E ye �e Mulct Undd yes 2 - - 7.700 1 LOW 1233 Mu W UadMdod No TON r 4 - _ td= 24.300 26:400 g - - 24.900 37300 4alo0 • The fade lora one oesaett me a mees"ed and seould be used only for 4'm'od PI-ntnig aoPhes - Tae corepuarr modets hoer W"w" this L.0m is dertvvd shoucd be usmd for mora soea6c ptenfmn4 aeplboona. .he aaoh aad dermng computer model ""mid rot be used for cornaor or mearaecoon dem4p alrcarm roorm eefmM rmmnsptseo mat 'Jatun atrorn am avers" daW vatne nux= m votaam s rbsaod on beam boar retumeae for revels of eervree and era basad on abe 1985 Hlrtbmsr Caoaaty Manual and rtorsda U%LOa data. eioad%Wf* .nth UMM Ufwa UM euaesr Of taws scorn abowd be acaaad on a csae by Casa basal. The aaeasa rnp%4 value ammampome a" kvat of aervres a'atmm appear on Uta becY. . " Caaseet be acnsrve%L 3o -am FSorlda Depoetmont, d 2Tamportaclon. 196& 3.1 - 3 M RECOMMENDATIONS Lodi Public Transit should begin a three phase gradual program for implementing both demand -response and fixed route transit service for Lodi residents. Implemented over a five year period, the phased program will consist of the following elements: ° ° Phase I - Develop./Implement Transition Strategy, July 1992 through June 1994. This phase will consist of acouiring larger vehicles for the existing demand -response -lystem, improving the dispatch system, hiring additional staff, initiating Sunday and passenger reservation/subscription service goal is to reduce passenger wait time from 45 to no longer than 30 minutes. Phase II - Prepare an Operational Plan, July 1993 through June 1994. The plan will include detail on proposed fixed routes, scheduling and equipment requirements, farebox structure, estimates of capital and operating costs, markQting and promotion, and how fixed route service will operate. The plan should also discuss how best to integrate the fixed route and demand -response transit services. ° Phase III - Implement Fixed Route and Demand -Response Service, July 1994 through June 1937. The fixed route service will initially consist of s t vehicles operating on three routes. Lodi Public Transit will need to closely monitor both fixed route and demand -response ridership and system costs. Cerdflcation Statement Stag' This 1992 self -certification was prepared by: (year) David Morimoto Name (209) 333-6711 Phone Number Community Pevelopment, City of Lodi Department, Jurisdiction Based upon the self -certification checklist and the attached documentation, staff is of the opinion that City of Lodi has conformed to the requirements of the (jurisdiction) Congestion Management Program. July 8. 1992 By: (Signature) (D) Governing Body The Lodi City Council has reviewed the completed checklist and (governing body) supporting documentation and has found that the policies and actions of the jurisdiction as re- ported herein comply to the requirements for conformance with the Congestion Management Program for San Joaquin County. Certified: Alice M. Reimche Tide: City Clerk Attest: JU C� Clerk 34-P November 26, 1991 Date: July 15, 1992 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN Self -Certification Checklist Designated CMF System 1. Are there any principal arterial segments that might be considered for addition to the CMP regional transportation system? If yes, please add to the attached conformance documentation. R9 Level of Service Standards 2. Are all level of service calculations for principal arterial segments for which the jurisdiction is listed as "lead entity" (or which fall primarily within its jurisdiction) included in the attached documentation? Yes. See attached A-1 and Table 1 3. Do any of these calculations indicate a LOS below the standard before interregional travel has been reinoved? N0. 4. Are all facility changes that may affect level of service calculations on the CMP system included in the attached documentation? N/A Transit Standards 5. Is all information verifying compliance with routing, frequency and coordination standards included in the attached documentation? No. lith currently meets the City's transit needs by providing genera i public dial -a -ride service. This service is available weekdays f rom 7: 00 a.m. to 7: 00 p. m. , and weekends from 8: 30 a.m. to 5:00 The service is available to the general public, although tlit, majority of riders are elderly or handicapped cert4f - The average daily trip count for 1991 was 310 passen ,, ; .. The City has rec-�,itly received a Transit Needs and Assessment and Systems Plan ;-,-ae by a consultant. The City is in the process of evaluating the report to determine the direction of future transit plans. The City will probably phase into a fixed -route bus system over a 4-6 year period. This will be done in conjunction with an expansion and modernization of the dial -a -ride system. Attached is a copy of the recommendations made by the transit report (attachment B-1). This will be the basis for future transit discussions. 6. Are there any standards that the jurisdiction is having difficulty complying with or believes that it should not be required to comply with? If so, explain in the attached documentation. Yes. Because the City of Lodi does not have a transit system other than dial -a -ride, it is difficult for the City to respond to many of the transit based standards. The City is currently studying expanded transit service for future years. 7. Have policies for facilities coordination, new/reconstructed streets and long-range transit needs been adopted by the jurisdiction as of dune 30, 1992? Will implementation prlicies proceed according to a regular schedule after that date? No. The City has not adopted specific transit standards as of June 30, 1992. This is in large part due to the fact that the City has just recently received a draft of the "City of Lodi Transit Needs Assessment and System Plan" report. Once this report is analyzed and discussed, the City will be in the position to adopt specific long-range transit standards. Once this is done, the City will also adopt a specific time table for implementation of the adopted policies. Land Use Analysis Program 8. Have all land use decisions requiring CMA review been submitted to the CMA as part of the local environmental review process? (e.g. General plan amendments with 1,000 or more additional average daily trips, general plan revisions, cumulative total of all general plan amendments). Yes. The City of Lodi has not processed any General Plan amendments that exceed the 1,000 or more additional ADT`s threshold. 9. Have all significant impacts of the individual 1,000 additional trip general plan revisions been mitigated? Has documentation of the proposed mitigations and their estimated costs been submitted to the CMA? N/A. Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Element 10. Is a description of all transportation control measures in place or underway included in the attached documentation? No. The City of Lodi is waiting for Transportation Control Measures (TCM) plan being prepared by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. Once this plan is published and adopted, the City will adopt a trip reduction ordinance. Capital Improvement Program 11. Is a list of all projects requiring state Flexible Congestion Relief, Traffic System Management or Urban Commuter Rail funds included in the attached documentation? Jurisdictions may also wish to include projects applying for Transit Capital Improvement program funds on this list. No. No projects are currently being funded by this program. 12. Is a list of all projects on the CMP system that the jurisdiction believes will increase roadway capacity or person capacity (transit) included in the attached documentation? NIA . 13. Is the information in these project lists given in the Regional Transportation Program format, in priority order, with estimated costs and all proposed funding sources? NIA . Regional Model Analysis 14. Does the jurisdiction wish to use its own regional model to perform CMP forecasts and analysis? I f so, has the CMA approved the use o f the model? DO Deficiency Plans 15. Has the CMA indicated that the jurisdiction must prepare a deficiency plan for a current or projected level of service deficiency? If so, please list the segments (s) for which a plan was required and when the plans (s) were submitted to the CMA. Were these required plans accepted by the CMA? If no, explain why. M LOS Calc. Sheet AWT A-1 Hutchins Street - Harney Lane to Kettleman Lane Use urban, two-way arterials, Group C S/Kettleman Lane 14,991 1992 Median ANT = 14991 LOS A (per TW a 1) Luwer Sacramento Road - Kettleman Lane to Turner Road Use urban, two-way arterials, Group B S/Vine Street 12,413 1992 Median AWT = 12,413 LOS B (per Table 1) Idulu 1 GE'�FERAL=I) MLMX LEVEL SCE MAXIMUM VOLUMES FOR FLC• nA S URBAN/URBANTLED (S.GW+) 15 tva r use from January 1989 U uvueh Dc"mbcr 1 FREEWAYS IWO-WAT ARTERIA S Czv"M 1 tauam ureeatied mea over 500.000 2nd leading to at aneato Cevatp w tomo ha 0-73 .i�altaed mtea..eneee t# teiw 3 =me of prmwp cW central buestae drauu Lanrw/ Low* tavdatsevtca Owatel t&.dd5avas A a C D E A 8 C O E 4 27.2700 42 61.300 71800 791300 2UedM. 15700 15000 15600 tq¢'100 17.400 6 41.70 61300 91.000 110.710 119.000 4 Dw. =3AW 31.900 31000 31900 34700 8 55.5w 81700 1222 ^ 147.600 15&-.W aDtr. 45400 4&107 4&721 52400 36 10 6&400 107.100 152.700 184.500 194400 C ooV a (0.76 to 1.5.tga.ua.d lamseeomoe pa mild Csea' 21waho urba mil nes ower 5aQdo mrd not is Croup 11 Luce/ tan" levdef3eves DW%Sd Is01110150"M A a C O E A 13 C O E 4 21.400 11000 47.100 34900 61.100 2Uod . 9.000 117[0 14300 117170 1&100 6 3300 403t70 7Q600 al= 91..00 4 Ow. 2000 2700 31A00 32500 34L000 a 42AW 64000 91200 113.700 122.300 a Or. 76600 45300 4&700 4aAW 51.200 C 10 31300 a230o 117:700 142.200 1S29W L Gnat& C (La to 2.3 idowdred tsesametraam par w rd A Crap 3 OAdm mr.rb.sewd atw.t L.aew/ $ 15412 tawddse mn Dtraded (addsevs C A- B O 6 $ .'100 ?7 4 17.140 24.800 45400 46.800 2Und1r. 10300 13300 t4am 11700 6 21600 3L5W 38.300 64000 73^00 40w: - 22.!500 29,00 31.710 31400 a 34.100 .32700 71300 9.700 97300 6 Doe. _ 31100 45000 47.900 5a300 I Group D 12.6 m 33 "pabod warescuovis per mid) ONZeWAZ ARTERLU-S care./ Orap D demo rh.r 16 al®oml med mteseellow per tnld Dwatmd tavtdd3w"M Aa'0. C D E rase trddsette. 2 Uedtw. . 2900 42700 11400 M a C O 4 Dwr. _ 2M1w 30..'.2170 = 2 - 9.800 14AM 11L900 (4000 tr 6Ob. _• _ 3a7W 4d1LX1 SQ.290 3 _ t4. W 22700 216CA 27.200 L 4 _ 121900 3aa00 34.300 34.7(10 • Grq L (16 to 4S otvabind mwweawm per mild a Owe" 7L DA to 43 alp mA d lawoncemem per tmld a Urea/ Orrrded law"[srddssvais A- t3-. C O C . Ayr, a- C. O It I 2 Ued1►.- 12300 14.4002 �_ �_ 11300 16.200 171100 4 Or. 26.100 32.100 3 y _ 20.3&0 2.1800 24600 6 01r. - •..• -_ 3M= 46AW 4 - - 27.100 31.•100 3S60Q C Cew" 1 tmove tbas 4.5 eipdimed %sewsweene per ask and not we peww, C"7'eestial btoos I• Cramp T (mare (lima 4-5 && heed per trait driarrs of wbtored 0.r, as ovs 501000 A l wy cone w and (set vrtQa>n or*narl tap &carr&! btaseamaa L L - t.aote/ Dwidad tad d Sass s drrrc d artoaerd as e.0. 500.0001 1 Aa- C- D C s 2UndM. 101300 14.800 Lroom laeddSe.om Z _ _ DW. a- C D E - - - 3kgw %om S I g 10.900 2 _ _ Maw 17.700 - - - 3 �, _ IfLOW 21900 2&x00 4 - 22.400 3400 33900 II Cf,mw G (msm tbu 4.5 dkpuWmed mtseeebmam per tato C tied vAth t pnmmr, my eared traattttrr drsrta of urbiwill and tram erar 3000001 L Laraem/ A C -Moo G (O1mae tbmn 4.5 wepmaaad mtQ secom to per nmfe Dwmd Lavd ef!aevtte and vera(• prenrrtr coW ventral bus aw" y A- a- C- D L "J dkwW d urtanorad ansa a.or 5040001 A 2 Und1e:11100 15.400 ,� - 4 OW. 21kx00 35700 Norm tsvd dSevndr 3 6Ow. _ _ _ 41700 51.200 K e- C 0 E. 3 III 2 _ _ 13 -IM 17.200 18.300 3 20.400 2&200 27.:`(,0 DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED AD-JUSTBMNTS 4 _ _ 27.600 35200 37.100 L^ (alter corresponding tyre•-ar arv=w volumt tndieaud MeeaU TWO-WAY COLLECTORS AND LOCAL sTREET9 Maas !Aem.a tilt nam tiara lettareae,t Factor lsupuuned tnttrseccoo anafvetal LAO" Ind d 5aret 2 Dtv+ded Yes T4 A C O E 2 UndrAded .40 t5% 7. 00 0017.9w 2 t 1.6 1 Mule Undrvoded Yes 5+r _ _. 1&Z" 24.300 26.400 Muttl Utadtvided No 20%4 _ Sr;m +4100 • be umed onto for veneral puanotn; aopbesavem. Th* commuter mod elm hem -Nett this tabic Tbt table, foes set daitedtsts it etsmAsal and snouW !e des IV shwW be tamed for rnom roeaQe fitanninS asiot"Oont. .he tanbe and dertNnS toomemi er naoddm wnct0d not be used for CVmdor or. U2&cr* ,Cmn dere&&. -nerd error. teAaes teenaaotars enmt. '/atun *no-" ase aversate dat)v traalle rnartaanm vo/ttIDa+m �b+eard on peak h ""'utnemt t""e""'04 of ""t"d are based on the tga•> I L*rMr CAamsstr Manual and Florida 0a/8e dant. �tamd- w" -tth tree than tae nurnber of lama anon roou 4 be tnatea on a Came W este fiaNm. T, he tat" a Input valve amount9tione -4 level of aer'vtca cm trot appy-.- on the back. Cann" be achieved. Soares: fiend& Drpetmmt at T aar9+rtscwts 108b - 3.i - 3 B-1 RECOMMENDATIONS Lodi Public Transit should begin a three phase gradual program for implementing both demand -response and fixed route transit service for Lodi residents. Implemented over a five year period, the phased program will consist of the following elements: ° ° Phase I - Develop/Implement Transition Strategy, July 1992 through June 1994. This phase will consist of acquiring larger vehicles for the existing demand -response system, improving the dispatch system, hiring additional staff, initiating Sunday and passenger reservation/subscription service goal is to reduce passenger wait time from 45 to no longer than 30 minutes. Phase II - Prepare an Operational Plan, July 1993 through June 1994. The plan will include detail on proposed fixed routes, scheduling and equipment requirements, €arebox structure, estimates of capital and operating costs, marketing and promotion, and how fixed route service will operate. The plan should also discuss how best to integrate the fixed route and demand -response transit services. ° Phase III - Implement Fixed Route and Demand -Response Service, July 1994 through June 1997. The fixed route service will initially consist of six vehicles operating on three routes. Lodi Public Transit will need to closely monitor both fixed route and demand -response ridership and system costs.