HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 6, 1990 (76)C "JNCIL C 0 M M U N I C A `_.0N
_____________________________ --
M: THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
JUNE 6, 1990
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1488 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
REGULATING OR PROHIBITING SMOKING IN CERTAIN PUBLIC PLACES AND IN PLACES OF
EMPLOYMENT
Ordinance No. 1488 - "An Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Regulating or Prohibiting
Smoking in Certain Public Places and in Places of Employment" was introduced at the regular
meeting of the Lodi City Council held May 16, 1990.
Pursuant to State statute, ordinances may be adopted five days after their introduction
following reading by title.
This Ordinance has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
AMR/jmp
COUNCO47/TXTA.02J
Followingreading by title, it would be appropriate for the Lodi City
Council o adopt Ordinance No. 1488.
AJ -W— limcaWlt"')
.e
City Clerk
•
ORDINANCE NO. 1488
AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
REGULATING OR PROHIBITING SMOKING IN CERTAIN PUBLIC PLACES
AND IN PLACES OF EMPLOYNENT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Lodi Municipal Code Title 8 - Health and Safety - is
hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 8.16 regarding the regulation of
smoking, as follows:
SEC. 8.16.010 Title.
SEC. 8.16.020 Findings and Purpose
SEC. 8.16.030 Definitions
SEC. 8.16.040 Prohibition of Smoking in Public P'�ces
SEC. 8.16.050 Regulation of Smoking in Places of Employment
SEC. 8.16.060 Where Smoking Not Regulated
SEC. 8.16.070 Posting of Signs
SEC. 8.16.080 Enforcement
SEC. 8.16.090 Violations and Penalties
SEC. 8.16.100 Non-retalia tion
SEC. 8.16.110 Governmental Age- Cooperation
SEC. 8.16.120 Other Applicable Laws
SEC. 8.16.130 SeverabiI ity
SEC. 8.16.140 Effective Date
4
Sec. 8.16.010 TITLE.
This chapter shall be known as the Smoking Pollution Control
Ordinance.
Sec. 8.16.020 FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
The Lodi City Council hereby finds that:
Numerous studies have found that tobacco smoke is a major
contributor to indoor air pollution; and
Reliable studies have shown that breathing second-hand smoke is a
significant health hazard for certain population groups, including
elderly people, individuals with cardiovascular disease, and
individuals with impaired respiratory function, including asthmatics
and those with obstructive airway disease; and
Health hazards induced by breathing second-hand smoke include
lung cancer, respiratory infection, decreased exercise tolerance,
decreased respiratory function, bronchoconstriction, and broncho-
spasm; and
Nonsmokers with allergies, respiratory diseases and those who
suffer other ill effects of breathing second-hand smoke may experience
a loss of job productivity or may be forced to take periodic sick leave
because of adverse reactions to same; and
Numerous studies have shown that a majority of both nonsmokers
and smokers desire to have restrictions on smoking on public places and
places of employment.
4
Smoking i s a documented cause of fires; and cigarette and cigar
burns and ask stains on merchandise and fixtures cause" economic losses
to businesses.
Accordingly,
the City Council
finds and declares
that the
purposes of this
ordinance are 1) to
protect the public
health and
welfare by prohibiting
smoking in specified public places by
regulating
smoking in places
of employment; and 2)
to strike a reasonable
balance
between the needs
of smokers and the
need of nonsmokers
to breathe
smoke-free air, and to recognize that, where these needs conflict, the
need to breathe smoke-free air shall have priority.
Sec. 8.16.030 DEFINITIONS.
The following words and phrases, whenever used in this chapter,
shall be construed as defined in this section:
1. "Bar" means an area which is devoted to the serving of
alcoholic beverages and in which the service of food is only
incidental to the con CO. -i Pti on of such beverages.
2. "Business" means any sole proprietorship, partnership, joint
venture, corporation or cthtt r business entity formed for
profit-making purposes, including retai 1 establishments where
goods or services are sold as well as professional
corporations and other entities where legal , medical, dental,
engineering, archi tech,: al , or other professional services are
delivered.
3. "Cining Area" means any enclosed area containing a counter or
z
tables upon which meals are served.
4. "Employee" means any person who is employed by any employer in
consideration for direct or indirect monetary wages or profit,
and any person who volunteers his or her services for a
nonprofit entity.
5. "Employer" means any person, partnership, corporation, or
nonprofit entity, including a r�unicipal corporation, who
employs the services of one or more persons.
6. "Enclosed" means closed in by roof and four walls with
appropriate openings for ingress and egress.
7. "Nonprofit Entity" means any corporation, unincorporated
association, or other entity created for charitable,
educational, political, social, or other similar purposes, the
net proceeds from the operations of which are committed to the
promotion of the objects or purposes of the organization and
not to private financial gain. A public agency is not a
"nonprofit entity" within the meaning of this section.
8. "Place of Employment" means any enclosed area under the
control of a public or private employer which employees
normally frequent during the course of employment, including
but not limited to, work areas, employee lounges, and
-c-
a. A private residence is not a place of employment, unless
it is used as a child care or a health care facility.
F
a
3
9. "Public Place" means any enclosed area to which the public is
invited or in which the public is permitted, including, but
not limited to: banks, educational facilities , health
facilities, public transportation facilities, reception areas,
restaurants, retail food production and marketing
establishments, retail service establishments, retail stores,
theaters, and waiting rooms.
10. "Restaurant" means any coffee shop, cafeteria, tavern,
sandwicn stand, soda fountain, private or public school
cafeteria, and any other eating establishment, organization,
club, boardinghouse, or Suesthouse, which gives or offers
food for sale to the public, guests, patrons, or employees,
except that the term "restaurant" shall not include a cocktail
lounge or tavern if said cocktail lounge or tavern is a "bar"
as defined in Section 8.16.030 (1).
11. "Retail Tobacco Store" means a retail store utilized primarily
for the sale of tobacco products and accessories.
12. "Service Line" means any indoor line at which one or more
persons
are waiting for or receiving
service
of any kind,
whether
or not such service includes the
exchange
of money.
13. "Smoking" means inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying any
lighted pipe, cigar, or cigarette of any kind.
14. "Sports ArEna" means sports pavilions, gymnasiums, health
spas, boxing arenas, swimming pools, roller and ice rinks,
bowling alleys and other similar places where members of the
public assemble to engage in physical exercise, participate in
athletic competition, or witness sports events.
Sec. 8.16.040 PROHIBITION OF SMOKING IN PUBLIC PLACES.
A. Smoking shall be prohibited in all enclosed public places within
the City, including, but not limited to the following places:
1. Elevators and restrooms.
2. Buses, taxicabs and other means of public transit under the
authority of the City, and in ticket, boarding, and waiting
areas of public transit depots.
3. Service lines.
-6-
the public, including, but not limited to, business offices,
banks, hotels and motels.
7. Restaurants.
8. Any building not open to the sky which is used primarily as a
museum or for exhibiting any motion picture, stage drama,
lecture, musical recital or other similar performance, except
when smoking is part of any such production.
9. Enclosed sports arenas and convention halls.
10. Every room, chamber, and place of meeting or public assembly,
including school buildings under the control of any board,
council, commission, committee, or agencies of the City or any
political subdivision of the State during such time as a
public meeting is in progress, to the extent such place is
subject to the jurisdiction of the City.
-7-
patients
within
the
room are
smokers and
request
in
writing
upon the
health
care
facility's
admission
forms to
be
placed
in a room where smoking is permitted.
12: Polling Places.
B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any owner,
operator, manager or other person who controls any establishment
described in this section may declare that entire establishment as
a nonsmoking establishment. Further, provided that notwithstanding
this chapter, the owner or person who controls such establishment
may, but is not required to set aside in any facility described in
this section, a separate room with wails and doors reasonably
impermeable to tobacco smoke for use as an employee lounge or break
room.
B. Within 60
days
of
the effective date
of this
chapter,
each...employer
and each
place
of
employment located
within
the City
shall adopt,
implement, make known and maintain a written smoking policy, which
shall contain at a minimum the following requirements:
1. Any employee in a
place of
employment
shall have
the right
to
designate his or
her work
area as a
;nonsmoking
area and
to
post the same with an appropriate sign or signs, to be
provided by the employer.
2. Prohibition of smoking in auditoriums, classrooms, conference
and meeting rooms, elevators, hallways, medical facilities,
and restrooms.
3. Provision and maintenance of separate and contiguous
nonsmoking areas of not less than fifty percent of the seating
capacity and floor space in cafeterias, lunchrooms aiid
employee lounges or provision and maintenance of separate and
equal -sized cafeterias, lunchrooms and employee lounges for
smokers and nonsmokers.
M
C. The" smoking policy, shah' be communicated to all employees within
three weeks of its adoption.
D. All employers shall supply a written copy of the smoking policy to
any prospective employee.
E. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, every
employer shall have the right to designate any place of employment,
or any portion thereof, as a nonsmoking area.
Sec. 8.16.060 WHERE SMOKING NOT REGULATED.
A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Ordinance to the
contrary, the following areas shall not be subject to the smoking
restrictions of this chapter:
2. Private residences, except when used as a child care or a
health care facility.
3. Hotel and motel rooms rented to guests.
4. Retail tobacco stores.
-10-
i
5. Restaurant, hotel and motel conference or meeting rooms, and
public and private assembly rooms while these places are beiAg
used for private functions.
6. A private enclosed place occupied exclusively by smokers, even
though such a place may be visited by nonsmokers.
B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any owner,
operator,
manager,
or other person who controls
any establishment
described
in this
section may declare that entire
establishment, or
any portion thereof, as a nonsmoking establishment.
Sec. 8.16.070 POSTING OF SIGNS.
A. "Smoking" or "No Smoking" signs, whichever are appropriate, with
letters of not less than 1" in height or the international "No
Smoking" symbol (consisting of a pictorial representation of a
burning cigarette enclosed in a red circle with a red bar across
it) shall be clearly, sufficiently and conspicuously posted in
every building or other place where smoking is controlled by this
chapter, by the owner, operator, manager or other person having
control of such building or other place.
B. Every theater owner, manager or operator shall conspicuously post
signs in the lobby stating that smoking is prohibited within the
A. Enforcement shall be implemented by the Fire Marshal.
B. Any citizen who desires to register a complaint- hereunder may
initiate enforcement with the Fire Marshal.
C. Any owner, manager, operator or employer of any establishment
controlled by this chapter shall have the right to inform persons
violating this chapter of the appropriate provisions thereof.
D. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, a private
citizen may bring legal action to enforce this chapter.
Sec. 8.16.090 VIOLATIONS AN) PENALTIES.
A. It shall be unlawful for any person who owns, manages, operates or
otherwise controls the use of any premises subject to the
regulatior under this chapter to f a i I to comply with its
provisions.
2. A fine, not exceeding $200, for a second' violation of this
chapter within 1 year;
3. A fine, not exceeding $500, for each additional violation of
this chapter within 1 year;
Sec. 8.16.100 NON -RETALIATION.
No person or employer shall discharge, refuse to hire, or in any
manner, retaliate against any employee or applicant for employment
because such employee or applicant exercises any rights afforded by
this chapter.
Sec. 8.16.110 GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY COOPERATION.
The City Manager shall annually request other governmental and
educational agencies having facilities within the City to establish
local operating procedures in cooperation and compliance with this
chapter. The City Manager shall urge Federal, State, County and
special school district agencies to enforce their existing smoking
_i3_
a.
control regulations and to comply voluntarily with this chapter.
Sec . 8.16.120 OTHER APPL(ART F LAWS.
This chapter
shall not be interpreted or
construed
'� "o permit
smoking where it
is otherwise restricted by other
applicable
laws.
Sec. 8.16.130 SEVERABILITY.
If any provision or clause of this Ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstances held to be unconstitutional or
to be otherwise invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity shall not affect other Ordinance provisions or clauses or
applications thereof which can be implemented without the invalid
provision or clause or application, and to this end the provisions and
clauses of this Ordinance are declared to be severable.
Sec. 8.16.140 EFFECTIVE DATE.
This
chapter
shall be in
force and take effect thirty (30) days
from and
after its
passage and
approval.
SECTION 2. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict
herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist.
-14-
JH ND
Mayor. of the Ci of Lodi
Attest :
ALICE M RDWIEE
City Clerk of the City of Lodi
State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.
I, Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify
that Ordinance No. 1488 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of todi held May 16, 1990 and was thereafter
passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said =.
Council held June 6, 1990 by the following vote: 4
Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Olson, Reid, and
Snider (Mayor) 1
3
Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton
Absent : Council Members - None
Abstain : Council Members - None
-15-
BOBBY W. McNAT"r
City Attorne;
ORD1488/TXTA
-lfi-
^. I A "
v F Y
IheuMahor"onrtif
Ordinance No 1488 was approved andiysi,
��
datet publ i sh
t y of ' i is 'passage. and the same
pursuant to law.
Chasbeen
}�
ALICE:M. RE,IMCHE
Ci ty Cl erk?, of s th'e" Ci y of
BOBBY W. McNAT"r
City Attorne;
ORD1488/TXTA
-lfi-
....Offlopm
THIS DISCRINUNATORY BAN WILL HAVE A FISCAL IMPACT ON ALL
LOOM' BUSINESSES. THERE ARE MANY OF US WHO ARETIRED CE' BEING
DICTATEDTO BY OUR SO-CALLED "PUBLIC SERVANTS."
YOU ARE URGEDTO ATTEND THE LODI CITY COUNCIL hMEMG ON
WEDNESDAY ,JUNE 6TH, TO VOICE YOUR OPPOSITION TO THIS INVASION
OF OUR RIGHTS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
T.U.F.F. (TAXPAYERS UNITED FOR FREEDOM)
334-3163 or 334-9288.
. . •:.sA>2'r:.s„- :C:haa�rr tiLv:i:.:r,E?1.. t.�.Lais' ' :.. �� ..
SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPROMISE ON SMOKING BAN
PRLORLTY:_ TO YORK`OGBTHBB TO.:SOLVE TiIS P130BQ!
The main problem is that the smoke is not being filtered.
adequately in smoking sections of business' which--'.effeeti
both the non•soo_king sections and the service people'
(cle';ks, Wei tOr* ;:waitress. and ;etc) who. ate, forced. to
breathe' it .during t2ie3s:;eatise a3ft. ;
Ipropose ,that a program be ast up .mith a probationary
period. .(3a..69.9. or/asd 12 months) A t the end of the set
period there w i 11 be a meeting of the business' involved,
representatives of service people,' the committee" and
council members to evaluate the effectiveness of the
program.
-- the business' on this program would have to purchase
portable air filters and or other exhaust systems place them
in the smoking section. The number of filters and location
would be initially designated by the the County Health
Department or a similar City official. These air filters
must be on and running the entire time the the smoking
section is open. Some business' may already have such
systems and only need inspection to be on the program.
(Perhaps one of our local business can get these filters at
cost € o r the program...)
" the city can encourage this program by off -setting
the cost, running, mat'nta>aaacs and repurchase of the filters
by a (across the board) percentage off of tht electric bill
of the business. (the percentage being determined by the
City Council and Utilities) :he city can also be the
leaders in this movement by continuing to keep city -owned
buildings non-smoking.
-- because there needs to be a 'watchdog' supervision
of business' on the program: to make sure the filters are on
and running, and that they are effective, I propose that a
volunteer committee be formed of both smokers and non-
smokers who would periodically make checks. These committees
would be issued guidelines and cards and would note problems
and improvements as well as the effectiveness of the
systems. A city representative would run the committee,
-- business' that choose not to be on the program will
automatically have a uon-smoking policy. There would not be
any exception to this rule.
Although this program may need modificatiou, I feel it
is a reasonable compromise to this problem, and if we all
work together it will become the answer -1
-14
Bingo is played 5 nights a week in Lodi. This a great fund raiser for
the clubs who run these games. 1f We Bingo players can't smoke for the four
or five hours vie are there WE will just go out of town to play,
Enclosed please find a list of signatures of Bingo players who protest
the smoking ban. This is only from the players on one night, Some like
me are not Lodi residents, but many are registered voters in Lodi.
THINK ABOT Il!!!!
Thank you for your consideration:
Evelyn Green
Woodbridge, Ca
w
7171 S- G,4Ari&Zvrj--
G
J-/Z-
-51-2
ez512
C
a;
P
O -P.
3
t� 7),a
city council of Lodi
Cite Hall'
=West Pine Street
Lodi, Ca
Dear Sirs and Madame:
This letter is in reference to the recent decision by the City Council
of "Silly City" Lodi to ban smoking in public places in the city of Lodi.
Not only arv.:the='gsmokers up in arms but the business people are up
in arim also,
I do not live in Lodi but I work,play, shop and eat in Lodi, If you finalize
the smoking ban I will no longer be playing and eating in Lodi. I may
no longer shop in Lodi either.
I eat out a lot but if I can't have a cigarette with my coffee I will.
make other arrangements. Every Dollar I don't spend in Lodi is lost tax
money to Lodi.
Bingo is played 5 nights a week in Lodi. This a great fund raiser for
the clubs who run these games. If we Bingo players can't smoke for the four
or five hours we are there VE will just go out of town to play.
Enclosed please find a list of signatures of Bingo players who protest
the smoking ban. This is only from the players on one night. Some like
me are not Lodi residents, but many are registered voters in Lodi.
THINK ABOUT ID!!!
Thank you for your consideration:
OF
v
Evelyn Green
Woodbridge, Ca
J
Subj: SMOKING ORDINANCE
Since the introduction of Lodi's smoking ordinance at the May,..,16,.'19901
Council meeting, I have received numerous inquiries from various' -,--persons
and Organizations regarding its effect.
The Council may find it desirable to address three types of businesses
which might be impacted by the smoking ordinance. .- Specifically, I..have
3oms �ow�,
received inquiries from cardr( ng alleys9:'and ,,;operators ,of bingo
games. Experience seems to indicate that these. are activities in which_,
many participants smoke, and those present sadn: to_assu6&thatc fact
If the Council at the June 6 1 -1990 -meting desire s'6,,,;amend,.'the -'ordnance ,
introduced,
r mance,introduced, I will have- available a:--. draft of the- ordinance modified.-,*
exempt bowling alleys, cardrooms, and` bingo balls. _-Shd0d that be} t he
case, the ordinance could be amended on the evening ''of? -June 6- and t' a-s-,'..'_'.
amended would stand introduced. Its second reading would occur at I the,'-'�`..._
June 20 Council meeting and it would become effective July 19.
Respectfully submitted,
t.
BotfEMcNatti_,_-.,.
City Attorney
BM:vc
cc: City Manager
V,ty, C1 erg
SMOKE4/TXTA.OIV
*** URGENT *** YOUR RIGHTS IN DANGER *** i1RGENT ***
The City Council is very close to banning smoking In public places in Lodi —including
every restaurant in town. If the new law passes, you wouldn't be able to smoke in stores,
banks, hotels, theater lobbies or buses. Smoking would even be banned in bowling alleys,
card rooms, bingo halls and community centers, and be restricted in the workplace.
What an outrage for people who live inAmerical The city is tearing apart your rights.
Don't let them getaway with it! Call your city council members immediately to protest these
outrageous new rules. Urge them not to eliminate smoking areas in restaurants and public
buildings. Phone numbers for council members are:
MayorJohn Snider 333-0901 David Hinchman 333-1652
Evelyn Olson 369-8441 Fred Reid 3349396
James Pinkerton,Jr. 368-2012
On Wednesday, June 6, the City Council will vote on the new smoking bans. 1%very
importantfor smokers to attend the meeting and speak out foryour rigghts. flan to go to that
meeting at 7:30 p.m. on June 6 at the Carnegie Forum, 305 Pine Sfi�eet.
RA ReynoldsTobacco Co.
(If you have any questions, calf us toll free at 1-800-33a-8683.)
----------------------------------------------------------- -----------
Please let us know what action you took and if you want to do more for smokers' rights. Just answer
the following statements, tear off and return In the postage -paid envelope enclosed.
Yes No
Yes No
A-;
O D
I will attend the city council
U U
{ ri
meeting on June 6.
my rights as a smoker.
O O
I phoned and left a message
❑ ❑
_ s
for my council member.
r,
held in my community. Here
❑ ❑
Are you still interested in
ACTION ALERT----
3ESORTEll FIRST CLASS
685939`3143
`��
be invited,
smokers rights newsletter?
*** URGENT *** YOUR RIGHTS IN DANGER *** i1RGENT ***
The City Council is very close to banning smoking In public places in Lodi —including
every restaurant in town. If the new law passes, you wouldn't be able to smoke in stores,
banks, hotels, theater lobbies or buses. Smoking would even be banned in bowling alleys,
card rooms, bingo halls and community centers, and be restricted in the workplace.
What an outrage for people who live inAmerical The city is tearing apart your rights.
Don't let them getaway with it! Call your city council members immediately to protest these
outrageous new rules. Urge them not to eliminate smoking areas in restaurants and public
buildings. Phone numbers for council members are:
MayorJohn Snider 333-0901 David Hinchman 333-1652
Evelyn Olson 369-8441 Fred Reid 3349396
James Pinkerton,Jr. 368-2012
On Wednesday, June 6, the City Council will vote on the new smoking bans. 1%very
importantfor smokers to attend the meeting and speak out foryour rigghts. flan to go to that
meeting at 7:30 p.m. on June 6 at the Carnegie Forum, 305 Pine Sfi�eet.
RA ReynoldsTobacco Co.
(If you have any questions, calf us toll free at 1-800-33a-8683.)
----------------------------------------------------------- -----------
Please let us know what action you took and if you want to do more for smokers' rights. Just answer
the following statements, tear off and return In the postage -paid envelope enclosed.
Yes No
Yes No
O D
I will attend the city council
U U
1 want to do more to protect
meeting on June 6.
my rights as a smoker.
O O
I phoned and left a message
❑ ❑
I would attend a smokers'
for my council member.
rights meeting if one were
held in my community. Here
❑ ❑
Are you still interested in
is my phone number so I can
receivin CHOICE, our free
be invited,
smokers rights newsletter?
259605939 3143
...cod.
phme ^""°«
X
.ipnriw�
LCAR0590E
INT YOURNAatE RESIDENCEADDRESS
RE(HS UM
TO VOW
ONATURE
YOUR NAhsl;
RESMENCEADDRESS
REGISTERED
TO VOTE)
GNATURE
YOUR NOTE
RESIDENCEADDRESS
REGISTERED
TOVOM
C.AATURE .
TD VOTE)
GNATURE
MINTY01i"ANAME
RESIDENCEADDRESS
REQSMRED
TO VOW
GNATURE
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR —Must be completed after above skoaturm have beca obtained
I miss residau of the City of LuJi. Coway *(San Joaquin, Califoraia. Each of clic sigtwaues to this Pditioa Vass sip w in my prance. I
cir—L" this mtiwtgonion sadsaw the appaukddpuaaabeinsvKiu,= E"hawwwwreordisAditimiktodwbest ofwyknwAodts=it
belief. the germ sipwurc of die pawn vtwse nwm it purpoRs tobe. All silpmu cs to d" lictitioa %= abtsinodtxt%val
end . 1 declare, under prnalty of pet}•.uy of the laws of the State of Califomin thn an faceptistt is une and con -ML
Dat �f at Lodi. Califosaia
� wx 1 •-cr Kx,'r� �,R§+?� ...- y $,� k rte.
a , t
er �r, ,�,.,,,_y --- �. C3�� — �r� t7i Vit.. rnac •� �i•
isjsirat. OA/ / w ver ♦ it n!¢ -,►/e n
y ,
17
Aj
..acs •
lojw
Al !i ,l
I
T o LLQ- Zra
7 z
o 5 ireQ
i> AJ tai cGr dL 4 Ci .
�� n � eLL e u� % ,� i r �4� • �, �. f- r G 1 e c� Gc.l i 7"� �%2:i !�
cir
cl Lu
CL e�r / a1
D r Ct1�.�•1 �o � i ro G. �.-r �r0 �L � IE !� oo-E. c
L1JJr . L�0 G E✓���
L¢c�t f o
/
uric'a
/45
css 4 A IA131
Al
" O�d./.:`i�.0 ✓G."s /c� l c':.4. % i'I E'er �� � r:si. � r ,� I"c=.:; t-'�C. % .
I 1 41
Letter to the Editor
Lodi News Sentinel
P.O. Box 1360
May 21,',.1990.,_.,,
G.�
�
Lod 1, CA 95241
D Q; /Madam -
ear
U
it _
The City Council's decision to pass the No Smoking ban in all "public
places", including private owned and operated businesses, is carrying
authority too far.
This decision is going to hurt many, many small businesses. It
wouldn't surprise me if some businesses moved outside the city limits,
but there will be many that cannot afford to.
What happened to our "inalienable rights" to freedom of choice? This
is still America. We the people are entitled to vote! Why doesn't the
council put it up to the people to decide what they want? Let us vote on
it and let it be the choice of the "majority", • not the choice of the "four".
It is hard to imagine how four "city council'! persons could take on
the job of trying to be their "brothers keepers" without any thought of
how the "brothers" were going to like it or not like it.
How come they don't come up with a ban on the sale of alcohol in
the City?'. Alcohol and drugs are the big killers and that is a fact they
cannot deny!
The next question is --how come people can still smoke in bars, they
are public places too. Fair is fair!!! Oops, I forgot, they and their
friends like to party and imbibe a little now and then so bars are O.K.
They don't want to shut down their friends place of business.
As Mr. Allegre said at the council meeting - "Communism".
s._ Jacquilyne Stewart
P.O. Box 144
Lodi, CA 95241
CC: Lodi City Council LE. I
. ca�;�,�� �t
V
HEALTH
end
imokec Some-
Isrim News
Sew studies sugggest it's'
leading cause of death
here's no denying that cigarettesarea
lethal addiction: smoking kills more
than six times as many Americans ev-
yyearasdied in the entire Vietnam War.
:it secondhand smoke remains a source of
.ter contention. Is it really a public-
:alth hazard, as the antismoking forces
ntend? Or is it just an annoyance? Four
'ars ago. the U.S. Surgeon General's of -
.e and the National Research Council i
.ekled the question. In separate reports,
)th firmly linked passive smoking tolung
:racer. They alsofound that smokers' chil-
-en suffered more than their share of res•
ratory infections. But neither panel tried
gauge the overall impact of passive
noking on the nation's health. The evi-
mce was still too sketchy.
That was four years ago. The big picture
now becoming clearer, and two new stud-
suggest it's not going to be pretty. In a
-aft report to be released this month, the
?A will conclude that secondhand smoke
causing 3,800 lung -cancer deaths in the
nited States even, year. If approved. the
a.ument will declare airborne tobacco
Toke a "class -A carcinogen"—a sub -
arse known to cause cancer in humans.
.e second new study, by San Francisco
=art researcher Stanton Glantz, suggests
:at lung cancer is only the beginning of
e problem. Indeed,Glantzcalculates that `
wive smoking causes 10times as much
Bart disease as lung disease. making it the
ation's third leading cause of preventable
cath. The only bigger killers, he says, are .
_.ive smoking and alcohol abuse.
The new EPA report—based on results
-om 24 epidemiological studies, including
that weren't on hand in 1986—could !
irry a for of political weight. An ac-
;:apanying "g aide to workpiace smoking
:;cies" will recommend that employers
Bate separately ventilated smoking
tinges, since segregation aloneoffers non•
-:okers little protection. The EPA doesn't
:-elate cigarette smoke. but deciaring it a
::own hazard could make way for rough
.,cai smoking ordinances. .Already, Los
.n.aeies City Councilman `:lar -:in Braune
_s proposed an outright ban on smoking
t
^'.: KKJtAftI/HU7l:t1I�(:.�Y1Scl{vl�ly AlK:
Playing with fire: Cigarettes may kill 50,000 nonsmokingAmericans everyyear
inrestaurants. saying the new studies take
us "way beyond the days when restaurant
smoking laws were introduced just to make
dining a more pleasurable experience."
The Phiiip Morris company. a staunch
opponentofsuch restrictions, has launehed
a pre-emptive strike against the EPA re-
port but has succeeded mainly at drawing
attention to it. In a press release, the firm
implies that the EPA is neglertiu a Yale
University study that tends to exonerate
passive smoking. Though that study. an
unpublished 1987Ph.D. dissertation, sug-
gested that previous research may have
overestimated the danger, it actually Sup-
ported "the existence of a small ,o•r,Toder-
ate effect of passive smoking on lu u -c a nce r
risks." And as Philip Morris concede;, the
results were not in a form that could be
integrated into the EPA's data pool
The dissertation relied on data from a
research project run by Yale epidemiolo-
gist Dwight Janerich, but it pus–?tine hat
Lugg disease is the least of it,: Gla?,,:
f ,
word on the project. In a new paper, sum-
marized in the printed program of a recent
cancer conference, Janerich reported that
the risk of lung cancer nearly doubled in
subjects who were exposedto agiven quan-
tity of secondhandsmoke during early life.
By estimating the number of people so
exposed and applying the risk factor. Jan-
erich deduced that passive smoking maybe
responsible for 20 percent of all lung cancer
in nonsmokers. That's a slightly higher es-
timate than the EPA came up with. Philip
Morris spokesman Thomas Borelli specu-
lates that Janerich "tortured the data"
until it said what he wanted to hear.
Heart disease: Lung canceraside, the accu-
mulating evidence on heart disease should
give the industry pause. By pooling and
analyzing the results of I1 recent studies,
Stanton Glantz and his collaborator, Dr.
William Parmley, showed that living with
a smoker has roughly the same effect on
heart -disease mortality that it has on lung -
cancer mortality: both -rise by about 30 per•
cent in the nonsmoker. But because heart
disease is 10 times as prevalent as lung
cancer,the same risk factor yields 30.0(X3 to
40,000 annua! deaths. Combining that toll
with 3,000 to 4,000 lung -cancer deaths. and
factoring in an estimated 10,000 deaths
from nonlung cancers caused by passive
smoking. Glantz gets agrand total ofabout
50,000 deaths. In short, one nonsmoker
dies for every eight smokers.
Glantz is not the first scientist to reach
this startling conclusi:,n: another re-
searcher. Judson Wells, published similar
figures in 1966. But Glantz's paper is the
most comprehensive review iodate, and it
goes beyond epidemiology to describe the
mechanisms by which secondhand smoke•
might affect the heart. Viewed as aµhole,
he says, -,he evidence on heart disease is
stronger today than the evidence on lung;
cancerwasir, 1936."Oneshudderstothink
what the next round of studies will shov:.
GF:0yF.i:v C ,w:.et
x :... 59
i
to nny /ezwnj wi A aUe4giw caa4ed 6y
#vbacco "lee.
(Fwm d1/ioz&M Line"
atw�i� u .th"
/� A aran
O Smoking costs as much as owning
a car. A two-pack-adaysmoker spends
'# ��
pope
$2,245on the habitper year. Thisbreaks
down to $1,095 on cigarettes (ata cost
of $1.50 per pack) ... plus hidden
S<nceAeGfi
costs—higher insurance premiums,
dental
neck al and expenses, missed
work, clattring and furniture damage,
,Q e� yn 8 Ka4L Lavin
etc—totaling about $1,150 per year. The
.,
annual cost of upkeep for an automobile
is about. 52.5.50.
i Don Powell. executive director, American institute
for Preventive Medicine. Southfield, Michigan. quoted
m7he.tfedicel Post, Maclean Hunter Bldg..777 BaySL.
Toronto. Ontario MSW 1A7.44 issues. $39/yr. —
THE IRVINS 52 W. ADAMS STREET STOCKTON CA 95204
June 23, 1990
To : T h e Mayor 3xaa City Cournci 1
SUBJECT: Proposed Health Ordinances (a satire, overview)
Do you know how many people in Lodi would die if it wash' t fcr
our City Council assuming the right to protect our health. Think
how this will proliferate the population in Lodi. It all started
within an element of Lodi and the Council acceded - Lodi business
owners don't have any control right to declare their own business
a smoking, or, a non-smoking establishment. And, that the people
of Lodi are too stupid to read a posted sign; and too stupid to
decide for themselves whether or not to go into an established
place of business where second-hand smoke is present. The premise
of the law is that the only solution is for the Council to control
the health of a person, neighbor, friend or relative from each
other. Smoking U was legal but it's stupid to smoke, and it's
also stupid for non-smokers to willfully enter a smoking area,
and then complain. Thus, to protect people from stupidity, the
City Council enacted a stupid law - restricting our stupidity.
But, the Council has stopped short of further protecting our
health. If the members of the council axe christians, and believe
in the Bible, then they need to enact ever more protecting laws.
They should forbid the consuming of swine flesh in every meal
establishment open to the public in Lodi as it's "unclean to you"
And, "ye shall not eat of their flesh". The legal authority for
this is found in the Holy Bible, Leviticus 11:7, Deuteronomy 14:8;
And, in Isaiah 66:17 it says if they eat the swine they shall be
"consumed" in hell fire - and that is a lot more serious to ones
health than smelling second-hand smoke. Ban the eating of pork.
And, another health protection law that needs to be enacted is
the prohibition of jogging anywhere in the City of Lodi. Some
doctors state that walking is good exercise but jogging can be
harmful to your health. Joggers are also a hazard to the driving
public in that joggers do their jogging in the streets and not on
the sidewalk. They do things for health, but then they defiantly
jog thru intersections disregarding the red traffic light, and
that is a worse health hazard than smelling second-hand smoke.
Imagine the legal liabilities of a driver who happens to hit one
of those health -fad nuts. And, who gets rased in insurance rates!
For the health and welfare of all, ban all jogging in Lodi.
I have more suggested decision rights of the peoples' health
for the Council to take charge of after they enact those above.
First infraction= $100; 2nd= $200; 3rd= $500; and 4th= shoot -em!
I have power to do all things, showeth the Lodi City Council, so,
its believable that these suggested ordinances might be enacted.
I am proud and happy that we can still exercise our rights
under the First Amendment, but, in doing so I do wish to keep
those friends that I have left, so for now, my nom de plume is:
iw 12c
We R. CONCERNED, Esq.
cc: Editor, LNS 1234 Every Place,
Dr. Ross group Lodi, California
T.U.F.F. group
•
."i`' 5, IWO
'10, er"a-
3 4k
E C
ALI
CITY
Ak
'd J%
J
A&f ......... to
4
PHONE: _
Mco Cod• ivwnter f.n�aion
REMARKS:
FRC1M:
TIME
FOR ACTION INDICATED
p As Requested p Phoned ❑ For Typing
❑ Information ❑ Returned Your Coll ❑ For Filing
❑ Comment ❑ Was in Office ❑ For Moiling
p APS p Will Cali Beck p Copy/Print .Reclmsted
❑ Return p Pkose Phone For Your Signature
El lets Nswss p Pleose Contort ❑ Take Core of This
PHONE: _
Mco Cod• ivwnter f.n�aion
REMARKS:
gill
PETITION
We, the undersigned people, which inclu(Tes'smoker:; and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the.loss of our riehts as individuals to excercise our constitution-
al guaranteed rip.ht to live our lives and make our own `cieci cions as we so
choose. and.this also includes the right to'spend ,or riot to spend our Mtoney
in` the City``of..Lodi. No smoking,in public places within' the. City :Limits. of
Lodi could result in a. loss of Ciperette taxer, within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of cip:erette sales in all stores.restaurants and vending
machines.:,and could result in the l os--,,,. of another; .3o-4o/revenue from. those
in out -lying areas and another loss of 10-15/*revenue from out of. State Tour-
ist. Smokees 'pay 60¢ excise tax on every pack of cit*erettes purchased in
the, State of California, ,and non-smokers 'should be saying "Thank You" to
Smokers who pay their share of a heavy _tax. but that will be -yours when
all have quit smoking. We do not like Lodi',; idea of. seprepating Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the sept-pation of :smokers from non-smokers with-
in the city limits of Lodi. x
(SICF 'PI1R) AI)1)i� C' 'f STATEL P
4
�_rt%' 10 L✓ GO c L� 7- z o L 14-
"7 a21f 7
2
PJ'!'I'PI UN --
We, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the -Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to_excercise our constitution
al guaranteed rieht to. live our lives and make? -out* own deci cions -`as Yee so
choose, and this also includes. the right to spend or, riot to ,spend our tSoney
in the City -of Lodi, No smokinc in public places within the City Limits`of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxe:: within the City.Limits, Could
suffer the loss of ciperette sales in all :stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result -in the Loss of anothor j0-40,4 revenue' ;,from -those
In out -lying areas and_ another loss of 10-1516 revenue from out of.State_ Tour 3
ist. Smokers pay 600 `excise -tax .on every park of..cif*crettt•s purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should --bp say ing' "Thank. -You" -to A-.
Smokers who pay their share of a heavy tax harden that will be ,yours when g
all have quit smoking. We do not like Lodi's idea of sef-repating Lodi from
the rest of the County_, nor the se.-ra,ation of smokers from non-smokers with--' '
in the city limits of Lodi.
y
3
RA22-MA
Z
1
F,
-3_ .z rat V ictr :!;P .r. T �-
i
Lo o
fo
6
r/Y
r
PETITION
We. the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California. within the County of San,Joaquin. and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our ri:!hts as individuals to our cons titutlon-
al guaranteed right to live,our lives and make! our, own decisions as we so
choose., andAhis, also include.; the rb,,ht to spend or riot to spend out honey
In the City of Lodi. IN o smokin-1 in public i)l.;Aceq within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cip.erette taxes within the City Limits, Could,
suffer the loss of clFerette sales in all stores. restaurants and vending
machinesil and could result in the loss of anothor )o-40,4 revenue. from those
in out -lying areas and another loss Of 10-15A revenue from out ofState-, Tour
ist. Smokers
pay 600 excise tax on every pack of cirr
pett es ptrrc I hased in
the State of California. and non-smokrn,s should be sayinp "Thank -you to
Smokers who paytheir share of a hea�- ' v tax. burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking. We do not 'Like Lodi's idea of sepi-ppating Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the seprration of smokers from non-smokers,with
in the city limits of Lod,
WAny SM
CpE Z T F
VE(FRINT) H) ADMIRE31; cl,
SIU"A' uq
2d,14 __dam -';2
10En
4 1 G1 I C- VeYU0 I 1>pry s
5qV D�vsy Z-0al, co
6 1 k 1720 6. f di In S s5 gid, Asa ve)
17n/ Its
L
8 _Bei V
<
.0 "a-
`- l /� �. � � __ :Vis, OA
�o
.6 rJfie_vc/9 6 6
.87 V:\LAI� � It
9
.0ez' (2.'a..�: 2 L_ z
Oct
PETITION
We, the undersigned people, which includes smok, i:-!; and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of' '.ian Jiaqijin, and the bodi area,
resent the loss of our riihts as individuals tc oxcercise our constitution-
al guaranteed right to live our lives and tnak,i our own dcclcions .-as_,"we so
choose, and this also includes vio ri.-,,ht to spend or riot to spend, our 1.1to'ney
in the City of Lodi. No smokin- in public places, within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cip.erette taxes: within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of cirerette sales in all storns, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the loss of another 30-40/6 rovenue from those'
in out- lyine areas an anol.her loss of 10-1516 revenue from out of State Tour._�_
ist, Smokers y 60o%xcise tax on every pack of civeretter, purchased in
the State of California,a-and non-smokers should be sayinp, "Thank You.' to
Smokers who pav their share of a hea%- ' v tax burden that will be yours when
m
all have quit sokinp. We do not like J,odi's moa of spi,repar.ing Lod! from
the rest of the County, nor the seprpation of smokers from non-smokers with—
in the city limits of Lodi.
NAXE(TRINT) sic AD D i i I; GTTY sTATE ZIP
ILI
2 E:
3 �i-�� � � l� __8� � l�•�'���____ � rte' � �s�5�
CC Ile
5 A. 1399 rev v 40D4 CA__95R;0
6/
6 j1 L 3999 A( Cue QV !9_29_4AD
MY
70A
) -AAZ A— --doz- %10
4b
�_7 YO
a9S276
6 a-lua Q1,1
? 13L,
8
0
�y
PETITIUN "'
We, the`undersi.pned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of Our ri.,hts as individuals to oxcercise our cona:titution-
al svaranteed right to 'live our lives and make oijr own decisions a.s we so
choose, and this also includes tho right to spend or riot to spend our rtoney
in the City of Lodi.''.,No,sirioklng in public: pl.ac.es within the -City Limits of
Lodi could result in a` loss of Ciperette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of eigerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vendine,
machines# and could result in the los:: of another )0-40/a revenue from those
In out- lyinp areas and another loss of 10-15A revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 600 excise tax on every pack of civorettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be sa.yint, "Thank You" to t
Smokers who pas? their share of a heavy tax burden that will be yours when
all have quit smokint?. We do not like Lodi's idea of spprepating Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the sePrpation of smokers from non-smokers with-
in the city limits of Lodi.
NAME(FRINT) (SIGNATURE) ADDRES:; CITY STATE 'LIF
,IYLI
tout,
4 zsa _ X71
- 4_2o
Let et 9.5,E
9 % , a Y . L l 30l �tJ �� z _ Jam" 7-
.0 83 Daw-')..w 6 Laalllf 5: 2`f -z -
.41.E fes_ J� �/G �/ �, � ` �___541_� cI�L
17,;'
iq-3C) Hli
1 ✓��- _errs' �[_'_'_� St _ �CP
77
PETITION
We; the undersiened people, which includes smokor^ and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin. and the i.odi area,
resent the loss of our rights ar, individuals to excerci.se our constitution-
al guaranteed right to live our lives and makir our own decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the ris,ht te.) spend or riot to spend our P"oney
in the City of Lodi. No smokin,,, in pub.Hc pkwes within the City 1A.Mits Of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cit,.erette taxon, within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of cip.erette sales in all store.3, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in tho loss of arothvr JO -40;6 revenue from those
in out -lying areas and another loss of 1 -0 -Ir -,A revenue frorr, out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 600 excise tax on every pack of ciVerettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers* should be stavintr "A -.'hank You" to
Smokers who PaV their share of a heavy tax hilrden that will be yours when
all have quit smokinfr.. We do not like bodi's idea of serrepating, Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the serr-Pation of smokers from non-smokers with --
in the city limits of Lorii.
T"E k
rRi IUATURS) IM. C STATE Z T F
m Q
2 5vminc s &/ qe-�_
U I ev V,,,v,- &T A
14 Lo
7
COIL200 GCO fy)-a- -41- JCj
7-
8
9
-0
.1
.2_ "
AAdA
4
5
6
7
R
L CT
Al aZ=6
8 , k V%4
9
q1 !�7
! -7
77�
PETIT IUN
We, the undersigned people, which includes smoker^ and nen-:smokers in the
state of California, within Jie County of San Joaquin, and the Dodi area,
resent the loss of our ri;,hts as individtials to excercise our constitution-
al guaranteed richt to live our lives and make our- own decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the right to spend or not to spend our t,Ioney
In the City of Lodi. ho smokins; in rnut,lie place- within thn City Limits of
Lod could result in a loss of CiPerette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suf er the loss of ciaerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the 1 oss of ano thor )0-40;6 rave nue from those
in out -lying areas and another loss of 1.0-15/6 revenue frog► out of State 'Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 600 excise tax on every pack of cirprette.r, purchased in
the State of California and non-smokers should be saying, "Thank You" to
Smokers who pav t h e i r sure of a heavy tax burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking, We do not like Lodi's, idea of sei,repating Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the sert-ration of smokers from non-smokers with --
in the city limits of Lodi .
-NAI:'.E(MINT) (SIGNA,ru iH)AliblES:; CITY STATE GIF
S✓ou�ALJ
5 1�)R cam. fD �. Q(4r f. 1, .4y�(� Q!5z-,
4
PETITION
We; the undersigned people, which includes sme'kers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our r- :its as individuals to excercise our con=stitution-
al maranteed rie:ht to live our lives and make our own decisions as me so
choose, and this also includes the ri_,ht to spend or not to spend our f:,oney
in the City of Lodi. P,o smokin , in pul,lic places within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cip,erette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of ciFerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending, .
machines, and could result i n the loss of ano�hcr 30-40/ revenue from those
in out-l,vin,- areas and another loss of 10-15/a revenue from out of State Tour, v
ist, Smokers pay 60i� excise tax on every pack of ci,•.erettes purchased in
the State of California, and non- smokers shoutd he oavinr "Thank You" to
Smokers who pay their share of a heavy tax bi,;rde,n that w i 11 be yours when
all have quit smoking, We do not like Lod i s idea of sePrepatinv Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the se;rrpation of :smokers from r;on-smokers with
in the city limits of Lodi.
'AME(F'RINT (SIGNATURE) CITY STA`l'E 'LIi
;s.
I i a _,� -`' s-�'i�,. ?�. l S ,�r�K -�' ��A� 9 SLS'
ova r Cyl
2 i"� �N b /! fleck ,ee l� i t A), Jc.1 A� fl `l
�c�s.�.. 9s�to -6
_C��:��
�/L oc � 2S�Y10%Cer'
C G`4, -2Z
PETITION
We, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and no,i-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to excereise our constitution-
al guaranteed right to live our lives and make cur own decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the ria,ht to spend or not to spent our Uoney
in the City of Lodi. no smokin in nubalc places, within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cip.erette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of cip.erette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the loss of another j0-40;.' revenue from those
in out-1•yinF areas and another loss of 1.0-15k revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 60C excise tax of every pack of ciiez•ettea purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should t e saying "Thank You- to
Smokers who pav t h e i r share of a heavv tax huz•den that wi 1 I he yours when
all have quit smoking.. We do not like Lodi's !dea of sevrepatinv'Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the serrnation of smokers from non-smokers with—
in the city limits of Lodi._
CITY STATE 'L I F
1 9� .�_)c
moi' I i! .. l'� '�"-1 'G�_�. � � /L% l �%� • C rT..� t•a., , ��,-c�.,,s�. __ ! "� � _/�_-'S 251L�
G_r.�-__��-5�
�q
PETITION
We, the undersiPned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our ri:Thts as individuals to excercise our constitution-
al guaranteed right to live our lives and rnake our own decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the rif;ht to spend or riot to spend our "orey
in the City of Lodi. r�o smokin- in public places within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of eiqerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the loss of another j0 -40/G revenue from those
in out -lying areas and another loss of 10-15% revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 600 excise tax on every pack of ci;rer•ettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be sa.yink, "Thank You" to
Smokers who PaV their share of a hea%-v tax burden that will be yours when
all have quit smokinp.. We do not like Lodi'; ir?ea o:' seprerating Lodi from
the rest of the County, r.or the sePrration of smokers from non-smokers with-
in the city limits of Lod..
.AME(FRIKT) (�RA A;iD;iES.'; `1Y STATE 'Z
<<"1 ,� �l< <lt' t/`���� / tCl'-!'k'
CIO 0—,) �Le
6 1 1 CJ ;I We-, 1VP_ -s
7 , Lam.,���•� - �t r cid,[:
C/4
,s
i ` f
C -A i L
I A
7' j
.2 -Ile-
.
/
.4 PQ CPO -
6 7/ c=? �c�/�C S �y� ,1 �; ��-����� �� S�� /� Trig 5 s.2 v�
Gt Ci (c!N .i,� ii: t J A-.\..,-•, _ _[C. �' L,... !'� l ._ _ J(-'L"�Al� 1 •�'E'[` •�-a (�.'{ _ �l-1,y[l.i.`�_ `�[F
1LL
1 .�L.L'L��.11 L4/C. t<�sl_i2/-�—:G_.L=/f�r..�'t�-�_:_�..'t.2�__=1�'• �� _..___Li�.1.'_^ E: �—�' %:��; , •„ c� (-; �, !a G
4
PETITION
We, the undersipned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within `.-he County of Sari Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to excercise our constitution-
al guaranteed richt to live our lives and make our own decisions as me so
choose, and this also includes the rifht to spend or not to spend our F.",oney-
in the City of Lodi. A -o smokin-c in public places within the City 1AM.Its of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of ci�erette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending,
machines, and could result in the loss of another 30-40A revenue from those
in out-lyinp areas and another. loss of 10-15/6 revenue from out of State Tour_
ist. Smokers pay 60� excise tax on every pack of' ciserettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be savint- "Thank You" to
Smokers who Pay their share of a heavy
v tax garden that will be yours when
all have quit smokinp,. We do not like Lodi's irlea of serrepatim, Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the seprpation of smokers from tion -smokers with-
in the city limi Of Lodi.
SIGNATURE) AI)DRIj''>' I 1/
'AAP 2-
NAI
2
—7,ql
L
Sq -
51,
9
0
PETITION
We the undersigned people, which includes smokers and n o6i-smokers the
of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the.. I -Lod 1- - area
c se':
t. the Aoss of our ri-hts as individuals to excer i our'.
��resen -,q-onstit0tjojj.:�
. :.-
decisions`
ju
atanteed'z'right to live our lives and make cur• own-as...e so -
;'choose, rind ':this also includes the right to spend or not our Toney
in the city, Of Lodi. No smokin-, in nublic places w ithin: the". of
,City Lumlts�.� .Could.
:a.:Ioss of Cigerette taxes within. t
Lodi could. result: in he: C d
'61g'erette sales in all stores, restaurants,.and �'.-'; vending
... Ing—
ld' resu It in
.�3,�.Machlhesq,:An �:cou ..the loss of another 30-40Ar4iA f tho"ie
. ..... W.. 'revenue
ue.n.,, rom
giiie,1166 pa;l-
t�4'.Vii t� 4 e.1 f 't
ou IF ar. as''and 'another loss of 10-35/6 r
pvenp
okerd,--Pai 600axeise."Itax on every pack . o
f, espurch'ase in.
the :State e ot !if i"
Ca orn a and non-smokers should be saying:to
Smokerb,who` pa their share of a heavy tax burden that will be yours-wh -. when
all have quit .smoking. We do not like Lodi's idea Of se� ating.:Lodi.;from
-rep.;
the County, nor the seprpation of smokers from.
the rest of-. non smokera:;. with'
in the city limits of todi.
NAV -E (FRINT). (S I G N ATU fil.) ADDRES"QP
CITY STATE:ZIP
Qla ox
:A�
1 PC -'I Y / f �, V U-*'\
PETITION
We; the undersipned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within.the County of San Joaquin,'and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to excercise our constitution-
al guaranteed right to live our lives and makeourown decisions as we so
choose, and this also.includes the right to spend or not to spend our Gioney
in the City of Lodi. ho smoking in public places within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxes within the City, Limits, Could
suffer the loss of cigerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the loss of another, 30-406 revenue from those
in out -lying areas ar.d' another loss of, 10-15A revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 60¢ excise tax on every pack of cirerettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be sayin.- "Thank You" to
Smokers who pay t h e i r share of a heavy tax burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking. We do not like Lodi's idea of sef=repatinp Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the seprpation-of smokers from non-smokers with
In the city limits of Lodi.
:.E(FRI ) ( IG; TU?'E)' ALD' T `STATE 'LI
Lr
` G q'
l
VIA
1 R 1 Q tJ�.► ► '^
7 �Shco i U
W� RAWII a
E,
.3
4
0
6
..4
PETITION
We, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to excercise our constitution-
al ,guaranteed right to live our lives and make our own decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the right to spend or not to spend our money
in the City of Lodi. Ito smokin; in public places within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigevette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss or eigerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the loss of another 30-40/. revenue from those
in out -hying areas and another loss of 10-15A ravpnu.e from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 60C excise tax on every pack of cir'eretter, purchased in
the State or California, and non-smokers should be saying "Thank You" to
Smokers who PaV t e i r share of a heavy tax. burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking. We do not like I.odi's idea of seprepatinp- Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the seprPation of smokers from non-smokers with-
in the city limits of Lodi.
NAV.E(PHIN-T) (SIGN-,kriiRE) , ADDRE3.';j _ „ „ C:I`iY STATE _'LIF
I
I
E
.3,.3 .1 Cl hi P, b Zf 2.
to
8-
9—
PETITION
We, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the,
state of California. within the County of s.it, Joaquin, and the -Lod! area,
resent the loss of our rlehts an individual,,-, to excercise our ,.constitut�jon_
al m,,iaranteed riaht to- live our live.%* and make our own rice isionsi- as we:so
choose. and this also includes the richt to sf)pnd or riot to spend our Mloney
in the City of Lodi. No smoking In public places within the City Limits of
?
Lodi could result in a loss of Clgey-etfe taxer within the City Limits, Could
suffer the IOSS of cisrerette sales in all store!;, restaurants andvending
'from
.machines. and could result in the Joss of anoth(,r )0_40A revenue .�.: those.
In -out -lying areas and another loss of 10-1510 rnwenue from out of:State ' Tour-
Ist. Smokers pay 60� excise tax on every pack of cirprettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should I)o sayint, "Thank You" to
Smokers who PAY their -share Of a heavy tax. burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking.'We do not like Lodi's idea of seprepatinp Lodi from
=the rest of the County, nor the seirration of smokers from non-smokers with --
in the. city limits of Lodi_
,f A,V,E(FRINT) jSICNXCVg.w.)"> . 113 J; ITY..52ATE_ Z I P
.3,.3 .1 Cl hi P, b Zf 2.
to
8-
9—
YETITIUN
We, the undersigned peoples which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to excercise our constitution-
al guaranteed right to live our lives and make otir own decisions as we so
Choose, and this also includes the right to spend or not to spend our f4oney
in the City of Lodi. ho smoking in rUblic places within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the`loss of eigerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could resu 1 t in the loss of another �0-40 6 revenue from those
In out- lying areas and- another loss of 10-15% revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers pay 60C excise tax on every pack of cit*,erette s purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be saving "Thank .You" to
Smokers who pav their share of a heavy tax. burden that w i 11 be yours when
all have quit smoking`. We do not like Lodi's idea of seprepatinp Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the searration of smokers from nnn-smokers with --
in the city limits of Lodi.
NAFtE(F INT) .(SI NATURE) ADDRES:; CITY STATE ZIP
5
6
7
8
9
0
1 _—
��
PETITION ' ' 4
VW, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and noti-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to excerci.;e our constitution-
al ;guaranteed rir.ht to live our lives and make our own decisions as we s,a';
choose, and this also includes th<, ri,;ht to spend or, riot to;.spend our f%,oney,°
In the%City of Lodi. `ho smoking in public pkice:> within the City Limits `of.''.
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerotte taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of eigerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the loss of anoth(•r )0-40/o revenue from those
in out-l.yinp. areas and another. loss of 10-I516 revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokers�ppay 600 excise tax on every pack of cirerettes purchased in
the State of C;a ifornia, and non-^mokers should be sayin;, "Thank You" to
Smokers who pay their share of a heavy tax burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking. We do not like hodi'c> idea of seprepating Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the serrr,ation of smokers from non-smokers with-
in the city limits of Lodi,
ppb' ' FRI �T ICA:A'PitR) I)I):35� CITY STATE LII~
T �: nom_
:f'O~0_ /7l%/ .S Ax, Goy /,3/!) nJ-�wV, : 5-115 r
%�:) If d
O.,0 s7 ;,Le)l ,.rteX_2-
3%5
5V
< pis z
I
rL.4 S_N. Re ls4 &.41j%ls�/ d i y.�l TFc...a•/ �t.n0CL��.�—
}1
l.0 �'^•
♦. �� Ll,
ay
PETITIUN
'e, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
tate of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
�esent the loss of our rights as individuals to excercise our,.constitutton-
,1 guaranteed right to live our lives and make out- own decisions as �Ae so
hoose, and this also includes the rinht to spend or not to'sperid our Gioney
n the City of Lodi. No,smokincl, in public places within the City Limits of
,odi could result In a loss of Cigerette taxes within the City Limits, -Could
uffer the loss of cigerette sales in all stores, restaurants.and vending
achines, and could result in the loss of another 30-4016 revenue from those
n out -lying areas and another loss of 10-15% revenue_from,out,of State Tow-
st. Smokers pay -W excise tax on every pack of ciFerettes purchased in
.he State of California, and non-smokers should be sa.yinp, "'i'hank You" to
.cookers who Pa.V t e i r share of a heavy tax. burden t h a t w i l l be yours when
11 have quit smoking. W do not like Lodi's idea of seprepating Lodi from
he rest of the County, nor the seprFation of smokers from non-smokers with --
n the city limits of Lodi.
NAME(FRINT) (SIGNATIR') Al)D!iESS CI`PY STATE ZTF
;_4 V (��/�.�,��. ! 32-31 A PA t/, S R>>, 1-,c e A, -�2 5 -LI 2-
1
�j1 �d icy/, AI
.8
9
.0
'1
_CLQ _1.i'_ �� ,.__�lc7SL•�..� ® Z
� i be I ac " cT_-___
pro"` PETITION
We, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of :ian ,Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our ri.!hts as. indivichialo to excercise our constitution- .
al guaranteed right to live our lives and mak„ our own decisions as we so
Choose, and this also includes the right to spend or* riot to spend our Gioney
in the City of Lodi. No smokin,; in tn:h.lie place:, within tho City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of cip.erette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the l osr, of ano thor )0-40,6 rovenue, from those
in out -lying areas and another loss of 10-1516 revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokersay 60C excise tax on every pack of cirerettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be :,a.yinp "Thank You" to
Smokers who pay their share of a heavy tax burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking, we do not like Lodi' s ir?ea of seprepating Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the searPation of smokers from non-smokers with-
in the city l i m i t s of Lodi.
NmfE(FRINT) (STUATUR ) ADWES:; CITY STATE 'LIP
4f
6c)o
4m M i a Vu
� ��r'o�l0 k
8 0
r __
Al
.8
9
.0
'1
_CLQ _1.i'_ �� ,.__�lc7SL•�..� ® Z
� i be I ac " cT_-___
S PETITION
We, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Dodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to oxcereise our constitution-
al ruaranteed ri,o.ht to live our lives and make our owr decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the right to spend or' not to spend our Mooney
in the City of Lodi. No smoking; in public places, within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxer; within the City Limits, Could }
suffer the loss of eiPerette sales in all stores, restaurants and vendinP 4
machines, and could result in the loss of another j0-40;6 rrvenue from those
In out -lying areas and another loss of 10-15/6 rovenue from out of State Tour-
ist, Smokersay 60o excise tax on every pack of cirerettNs purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be sayint, "Thank You" to
Smokers who nay their share of a heavy tax burden that will he yours when
all have quit smokine. We do not like Lodi':: iciest of sfg,repatingi Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the sPrrlration of smokers from non-smokers with --
in the city limits of Lodi.
:�A!+'. (FRIAT) .(§1 At ATITHE) Alip;ir i:; c;,4 STAT6 LIF
0
�21,?
d
4
7 ! 7.7 -2 _
J
9 ,L� f �� `Y� / ^%7 S 4;:'�a •-fes S !(=,1
x
ok
PETITION
We, the undersigned people which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to excercise our cons t itu t104-1,
al gruaranteed right to live our lives and make our own decisions as we so:-:-.
choose, and -this also includes the right to spend or not to spend our r,ione
In the City of Lodi. No smoking in public t its 0
places within he City Lim f
Lodi could result in a loss of Cigerette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of cigerette sales in all stores restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the loss of another )0-40;4 revenue from those
in out -lying areas and another loss of 10-15*fevenue from out of State.,Tour-.,
ist. Smokers pay 60o excise tax on every packof olgerettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should be sa"yinp "Thank You" to,
Smokers who PaV their share of a heavy tax burden that will be youxs when
all have quit smoking. We do not like Lodi's idea of seprepating Lodi from
the rest of the County, nor the seprpation of smokers from non-smokers with—
in t :city limits of Lodi.
CIT.' STA"
rNIAND'.. E SIGH TURE) ADDRE'S T rE zip
7
2
MWMWAWAMIRTM��
7
4-- <h,(J11jjo1)
5--
V /1'A
.6-
0
Ut
, I
4
PETITION
'e, the undersigned people, which includes smokers and non-smokers in the
tate of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Lodi area,
esent the loss of our rig=hts as individuals to excercise our constitution -
.1 guaranteed richt to live our lives and Make our own decisions as we so
hoose, and this also includes the right to spend or not to spend our i.;oney
n the City of Lodi. ho smokin:; in public places within the City Limits of
,odi could result it --?,a loss of Cig,,erette taxes within the City Limits, Could
uffer the loss of eiperette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending;
:aehines, and could result in the loss of another— 30-406 revenue from those
n out -lying areas and another loss of 10-15A revenue from out of State `Pour-
st. Smokersay 60o excise tax on every pack of ei,c;erettes purchased in
he State of Cpalifornia, and non-smokers should be sa.yinp "Thank;You" to
;cookers who pay their share of a heavy tax burden that will berken
.11 have quit smoking. Vie do not like Lodi's idea of geprepatin i frpm
he rest of the County, nor the seprpation of smokers trom non-smokers with --
n the city limits of Lodi,
NANE(FRINT) ' (SIkN1ATlJtil) AI)llitl::i:i CIVY STATLe GIF
adr� z
fa-MW"A WsrwAl
%jam q- o
7
3
)
PETITIOI4
VVIR the undersigned people, which includes srrmker:: and non-smokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and thy! t,od i area,
resent the loss of our rights as individuals to exc-:reise our constitution-
al ?uaranteed right to live our lives and makes our own decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the riF%ht to spend or not tospend our Gioney
in the City of Lodi. No smokim?, in public places within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Ciperette taxes within the City Limits, Could
suffer the loss of eiperette sales in all stores, restaurants and vending,
machines, and could result in the los:; of another- j0-40,4 revenue from those
in out-l,yinp_, areas and another loss of 10-1516 revenue from out of State Tour-
ist. Smokersay 60y excise tax on every pack of ciperettes purchased in
the State of California, and non-smokers should Li sayint• "Thank You" to
Smokers who Pay their share of a beav,v tax burden that will be yours when
all have quit smoking. We do not like I.odi's idea of sei,repating Lodi from
the rest of the Courty. nor the seprration of smokers from non-smokers with-
in the city limits of Lodi.
NAME(FRINT) (SICA:ATURE) AI)DRES:i CITY 3TA`i'E ZIF
I — -- —
AIJ
i...., -s �_ 1 1
0 ►`' 1 1/21� c c:,c_
i
2
_7
r�
4-71
•D
0
.I
PETITION
We, the undersipned people, which includes smokers; and rion-mreokers in the
state of California, within the County of San Joaquin, and the Jodi area.
resent the loss of our ri=chts as indivichial.,to excerci::e our cor.>titution-
al guaranteed rieht to live our lives and mak,! oijr own decisions as we so
choose, and this also includes the ri,;lit to spend or riot to spend our r."oney
in the City of Lodi. No smokin , in nuhlie places within the City Limits of
Lodi could result in a loss of Ciperette taxes: within the City Limits, Could
suffer the toss of eigerette sales in all store:;, restaurants and vending
machines, and could result in the lose of anoth(�r )0-40A revenue from those
in out-l.yinF areas and another loss of 10-15/o rr;venue from out of Ltate Tour-
ist. Smokersay FOC excise tax on every pack of cirpette s purchased in
the State of Cpalifornia, and non- r•
smokers should be savirir "':hank You" to
Smokers who nay their share of a hea%w tax burcion that. will he yours when
all have quit smoking, We (io not like I.odi' . ir?ea o" sprreratink, Lor3i from
the rest of the County, nor the serrr•ration of :smokers From non-smokers with-
in the city limits of Lodi .
NA .E(PRINT) (SIG- ATT .'•;1 A1)I);r.'S c;I'PY STA',Nt ZU
1
z
3t- E ITE
o 75A 90
7 f4e 40 /S"/6 I� ToZ
6
9
0
2Y6
2SO7 yZ)
C T _
Fynl"Ul 7T
-
TV
V-}
i
f'
4"3 ✓ �� J c_ , i t� ���;
C,
y
_ vK �X�►-s����c�1 �"a�� _513111_/1 t� �z���� � ----•
5 111c,
a .
,
�t
f �t•c 5'O. LOn c.i %� �/'� 1-La�/ �i 1 i � ���/� < �, .�;"3 • r+•ay "t9 � use.
� � q�
� Wit.
< �
� � \j
.l
\� �X27
/®.
� \� :
1II -- . - ---._._.._ _.
y
r
IM
✓ v
WAI
0 AJ
PO -7 —o cv
1 tj c -o
IN
•
0 AJ
PO -7 —o cv
1 tj c -o
IN
1
NAM im! -
IVA,
I
cso
11
YOUR NAMEI RESIDENCEADDRESS I REGISTERED
TO VOTE!
RN7YOUR NAME I RESIDENCEADDRESS
uaiucs�a.c �v�nra.� KtU1J 1 tii
PETITION FOR RESIGNATION OF LODI CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ..
The following persons. residents of the (lily of Lodi, County of San
Joaquin. State
of California. hereby request that the
following members of the 'Lodi City Council
tender their resignations as Council
members:
RANDY SNIDER, DAVID HENCHMAN. FRED REID, and EVELYN OLSON.
Said petitioners believe that said Council members are not acting
in the best
interests of the citizens of the City of Lodi
Wf Y N
RESIDENCEAD
TOREGI�STOW
fl�JZ IGNAT E
•
�Q
Q
YOUR NAh9E t
RESIDENCE DRESS
StERED
RINT YOUR NAAS
D CEADDRESS'
RE VOTE?
GNATL'RE )
( � J
s
UR '
Fgk mod ����.
RESIDENCE DRESS
3 N o ���z
REGISTERED
TO,►�
GNATURE
� S
MW Y—rfl'4��2
M33o�-� y
IGN URE
>1,4= V
'i0(!it �:
ID AD
RFiG1StERFD
GNAT-VRE
J�WI/Jyl�Glii/
TO YV.
11
YOUR NAMEI RESIDENCEADDRESS I REGISTERED
TO VOTE!
RN7YOUR NAME I RESIDENCEADDRESS
uaiucs�a.c �v�nra.� KtU1J 1 tii
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR —Must be coutpWd after atwve signatures Crave been obtained.
I am a resi&ut of the City of Lodi. County of Sao Joaquin, Califomia. Each of the signatures to Ibis Petition was siVbed in my presecre. I
circulated this Petition suction and saw the appended sigiu mm being %Witten. Each sigaawre of this Petition is, to the best ofmy lmowted muml
bcbcf. the geniune $: person
gauwm of dw %hose name it purports tar be. All siVatur" to this petition were obtained bet%xrt _ fp_� � C�
WW 4, — fo —9 . I declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated ��L�_�_• at Lodi. California. L
RI,M'' YOUR NAA ..
RESIB ADDRESS
...� e7o -
'� {�sya�u. t
REGISTERED
TOVOTE?
nM Y4UR NAME
RESIDENCE `D`RESS
REGWERED
'!1D VOTE?
GNATURE
,RwyA �n-
ry
RESIDENBADDRESS
13,13 Co/-L Y
REGISTERED
TO VOCE?
IGN URE
�//'- 57
Y,4—:-
J f=
REGISTERED
-0" OTE!
f D °S N�ID
u
AD
1C•NAT E
i �J`
p
RUNT YOUR NAME
RESIDENCE ADDRESS
REGISTERED
TO VOCE?
tGNATURE
RINT YOUR NAME
RESIDENCEADDRESS
REGISTERED
TO VOTE?
IGNATURE
PPLNT YOUR NAXIE
RESIDENCE ADDRESS
REGISTERED
�IGKATURE
TO VOTE?
RINT YOUR NA261E
RESIDENCE ADDRESS
REGISTERED
TO VOTE?
SIGNATURE
TO VOTE7
IGNATURE
r.Drr YOM NAME
RESID DRESS
REG
TO Y01V
[IGNATURE
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR —Must be coutpWd after atwve signatures Crave been obtained.
I am a resi&ut of the City of Lodi. County of Sao Joaquin, Califomia. Each of the signatures to Ibis Petition was siVbed in my presecre. I
circulated this Petition suction and saw the appended sigiu mm being %Witten. Each sigaawre of this Petition is, to the best ofmy lmowted muml
bcbcf. the geniune $: person
gauwm of dw %hose name it purports tar be. All siVatur" to this petition were obtained bet%xrt _ fp_� � C�
WW 4, — fo —9 . I declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated ��L�_�_• at Lodi. California. L