HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 3, 1992 (28)ao
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Ratification of 1992-93 Council of Governments (COG) Budget
MEETING DATE: June 3, 1992
PREPARED BY: City Manager
kECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council receive the Council of
Governments (COG) budget for 1992-93 and take action
as deeme3 appropriate.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Council of Governments (COG) Board of Directors
has approved the COG budget for 1992-93. A copy of the
budget is enclosed with this agenda packet. Pursuant to the COG Ia Joint Powers
Agreement, following the adoption of the budget by the COG board, it is
presented to member agencies for ratification by each governing body.
Mr. Bart Meays, COG Executive Director, will be in attendance at Wednesday
night's meeting to present the budget and answer any questions Councilmembers
may have.
FUNDING: None specific at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Thomas A. Peterson
City Manager
TAP hr
Rnclosure
CCCOM496/TXTA.07A
APPROVED.
THOMAS A PETERSON feCYCIeo oaPW
Ctty Manager
CITY COUNCIL
JWE'SW. PINKERTON, Mayw
PHLLPA. PENNINO
Marx Pro Tempore
DAVID M. HINCHMAN
;ACK A SIEGLOCK
JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
P.O. BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209) 134-5634
FAX 17 M 333-6795
June 9, 1992
Mr. Sartori, R. Meat's
Executive Director
San Joaquin County
Council ce Governments (COG)
P.O. Box 1010
Stockton, CA 95201-1010
Dear Mr. Meays:
THOMAS A PETERSON
City Manager
ALKE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
BOB WNATT
City Anomey
This letter is to inform you of the action taken by the Lodi City
Council approving the 1992-93 San Joaquin County Council of
Government's (COG) budget at the regular City Council meeting held June
3, 1992.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate
to contact our office.
Very truly yours,
&Zt/ /k .
$zwk
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
MAY 21 92
Sa,. Joaquin County Council,.., Governments
19401 1 C4 Managers Office
Memhet Agenic.: Citic. at (acahm. I.nhmp. btib. hianlcca. Itipt.n. Stowktt.n. Tracy. Cwunty n( San linyuin
May 18,1992
Mr. Thomas Peterson, City Manager .
City of Lodi
221 W. Pine street
Lodi, California 95241
Dear Mr. Peterson:
Attached is a memorandum from me to your Council transmitting the fiscal year
1992-93 budget of the Council of Governments approved by the COG Board on April 28,
1992 and five copies of the budget document. Pursuant to the COG's Joint Powers
Agreement, following adoption of the budget by our Board, it is to be sent to member
agencies for ratification by each governing body.
Therefore, I request that you place the COG budget for fixA year 1992-93 on a
forthcoming agenda for your Council's approval.
COG staff would be pleased to appear before your policymakers to answer any
questions they might have regarding this matter.
Please let me know when this wiH be appearing before the Council. If you have
any questions regarding this matter, don't hesitate to contact either Steve Dial or me at
46&,3913.
Thank you for your assistance.
Respectfully,
�BARTON R. SAYS
Executive Director
Regitmal Transportation Planning Agency. Local Transportalion Anthortty. Congestion Management Agency. Airport Land Use Commission
lr'' `.. nih C m hu'luni SfILil. llh f .—I 0 1' 1l It,% Ilrl!1 - .slo,U l,. I ,J f,•;nt,r girl Inin . I !IN), lr,,� I'll I • FAX I:Ilnr ;r.\ Inv:
Memhet Agencies: Cities of Fscalon. Lathrop. U -41i. Manteca. Ripon. Stockton. Tracy. Count-, of San Joaquin
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors, San Joaquin County
City Councils of Lodi, Stockton, Manteca, Lathrop, Tracy, Ripon and
Escalon
FROM: Barton R Meays, Executive Director Z.
Executive Director
SUBJECT: COG's 1992-93Adopted Budget
DATE: May 18, 1992
Aiiached is the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' (COG) budget for 1992-93
adopted by the COG Board on April 28, 1992 The COG Joint Powers Agreement
stipulatesthat this budget must be sent to all member agency's governing boardsfor their
ratification. According to the JPA, the budget must be approved by a majority of our local
jurisdictions (five), representing over 55% of the county's population inorderto be ratified.
This year's budget takes shape in the form of a comprehensive financial Plan. I think
you will find, as did the COG Board, that the new format, which provides a three year
history of revenues and expenditures, is quite informative.
In summary, tha COG budget overall is 5.2% or $120,000 smaller than fiscal 1991-92.
The following highlights of this year's budget reflect comparisons to the adopted 1991-92
budget:
• A 5.8% reduction in REVENUES from 1991-92, due primarily to a decreasing
ne.43d for Measure K funds because of the completion of the Strategic,
Transit and Financial plans.
• A 16.7% increase in SALARIES AND BENEFITS due in part to the Board
authorizing one additional Assistant/Associate planner position and the
conversion of b o contract ridesharing positions to permanent salaried
positions.
0 A 28.1 % reduction in SERVICES AND SUPPLIES.
COG Budget Transmittal
May 18, 1992
Page -2-
o OFFICE EXPENSES are reduced 5.6% reflecting the completion of the move
into the Human Services Agency building.
o COMMUNICATIONS was generously budgeted last year to provide for a new
phone system when COG moved into now offices. This fine item is reduced
35.3% reflecting the operahonal needs for this year.
o MEMBERSmIPs increases by nearly 15% due to COG's expanded role the
need to be involved in a number oforganizations and associations.
o MAINTENANCE -EQUIPMENT increases by 20.3% to reflectthe increased number
and the aging of computers, printers and other office equipment.
• RENTS & LEASES EQUIPMENT increases by 17% with the addition of a copier,
a FAX machine and a new postage handling system.
• TRANSPORTATION & TRAVEL decreases by 10.8%. Al anticipated travel is
identified in the budget worksheets.
• SPECIAL DiSTR/CTA„COUNnNO is minor item that decreases 19.8% reflecting
actual casts.
• ALLOCATED SERVICE COST reflects actual casts of San Joaquin County
services rendered to COG and is reduced by 51.8%.
® PUBLICATIONS AND LEGAL NOTICES increases slightly by 6.9% reflecting the
demand to publish more documents and notice more activities.
• INsuRANcE increases dramatically by 80.61/a reflecting higher premium rates
and increased staffing.
o BUILDING MAINTENANCE drops 30.3% due to the majority of spending in ttds
category is included in tho lease agreement with San Joaquin County for
office space in the Human Services Agency building.
• RENTs-STRUCTURES & GRouNos increases 61.9% reflecting the higher rent
and larger office space than at the Hazelton complex.
o Infiscat 1991-92, COG began building an OPERATING RESERW with a goal of
$300,000 to $500,000. Last year, we hoped to set aside $100,000. In 92-
93 COG would like to set aside another $24,000.
COG Budget Transmittal
May 18,1992
Page -3-
• PROFESsK AL SERWCES decrease by nearly 10% reflecting the completion of
three studies for Measure K.
• FDW ASSETS decreases by 57% as COG slows down its computer
purchasing for the year.
VIsi T-21
The COG Board requests the ratificationof this budget by the Cities and the County.
Fiscal Year 1992-93,
cn0
San Joaquin County
Council of Governments
San Joaquin County Council -of Governments
ANNUAL FINANCIALPLAN
Fiscal Year 1992-93
CHAIR
David Ennis, Mayor, City of Ewalon
VICE -CHAIR
Phillip Pennino, Councilmember, City of Lodi
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mayor Joan Darrah
Councilmember Nick Rust
Councilmember Mac Freeman
Mayor Clyde Bland
Councilmember Dave Balsinger
Supervisor Evelyn Costa
Supervisor Ed Simas
Nktyw Edmund Fiechtmeir
Don MacVcar
Lowell Snyder
Ron Coale
EX OFFICIO DIRECTORS
SUBMITTED BY:
Barton R. Ways
Executive Director
City of Stockton
City of Stockton
City of Lathrop
City of Tracy
City of Manteca
County of San Joaquin
County of San Joaquin
City cf Ripon
Caltrans District 10
Stockton Metropolitan
Transit District
Port of Stockton
mm
San .Joaquin Cougv Council of Governments
\lemur .Agenic,: Citic% of F,,:Aon. Lai! -7,p. bkfr. Mf nein. Ripon, St,kRton. Trace. County of San Joaquin
April 24, 1992
The Honorable Board of Directors
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
Dear Chainran and Board:
Enclosed for review and consideration is the proposed Budget for the 1992-93 Fiscal Peer. The
Budget is ca posed as a restatement, in terms of object accounts and line items, of the Overall
Work Program to be adopted by the Board. The Budget includes expenditures totaling
$2,165,700, which are programmed as follows:
Program Amoun Percent
Regional PIanning
$ 217,700
Air Quality
$ 166,500
0ongetstion Management
S 57,200
Airport Land Lbe Commission
S 16,000
Local Transportation Authority
S 133,000
Transportation Planning
$ 945,400
Data Management
$ 50,000
Administration
$ 134,700
Member Services
5 61,800
Ridesharing
$ 280,000
Community Involvement
S 100.4
TOTAL $2,165,700
_fir Pi"4114111) *9
The 1992-93 Budget provides estimates of the following revenues:
10.05
7.69
2.64
.74
6.14
43.79
2.31
6.71
2.85
12.93
4.64
100.00
Source
Amount Percent
Federal
$940,700 43.4
State
$405,000 18.7
Regional/Local
$820,000 37.9
i
Pegianat Transportation PfanninX Agency. laical Transportation Authority, Congestion >lanaKement Agency. Airport Land Use Commission
10' Sk,uth San loauurn $beet. 1th Fi;,r.r • P () Boy 1010 • Suxk?. r Culii; rr;:a u''?i 1010 • i'U')r -108- 1913 • Fat (209) 164-10$1
The anticipated revenues are composed of $695,000 in funds carried over from the prior fiscal
year and $1,470,780 in new receipts. The revenue projections include the following highlights:
1) An increased combined federal allocation of $564,300 for transit, streets and highway
planning.
2) A carry over of the Altamont Pass Corridor Study ($600,000).
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
The 1992-93 Budget includes the following expenditures:
Object Class
Amount
Percent
Personnel
S 844,195
39.0
Contract Services.
$1,043,800
48.2
Service and Supplies
$ 257,522
11.9
Capital Outlays
$ 20,000
.9
White this year's budget contains a slight decrease from fast year, it proposes to convert a nearly
full tine intern position to an Assistant/Associate Regional Planner and convert two contract ride
share positions to permanent positions. It also includes funds for an annual adjustment. This
results in a 16.7% increase in personnel costs. Consultant services decrease by 22% over last
year and services and supplies are proposed to decrease by 28.1%. Capital expenditures are
programmed to decrease by 57.0%.
GENERAL COMMENTS
The last nine months have been a transitional period for both myself and COG as we begin to
tighten the financial management structure within the COG, as well as expand our role in
planning and fund allocation as the Local Authority. The summary of the total
fiscal responsibilities cf the COG are shown below.
Fiscal Year 1992-93
Local Transportation Authority $19,000,000
Transportation Development Act Funds $ 9,900,000
COG Operating Budget $ 2,165,700
Federal Transportation Program $ 1,900,000
TOTAL $32,965,700
4
This begins to describe the magnitude of the fiduciary responsibilities of the COG as well the
planning responsibilities. These responsibilities are taken very seriously by the COG staff as
we attempt to illustrate that local government can in fact administer the types of programs.
W e are fully aware that both the public and the federal government are watching government
organizations such as aars to see how well they perform in this role.
As we began to formalize our administrative procedures we also quickly moved into a year of
implementation for the Local . - Spotati,cn Authority. This next year we will be asked to take
a much greater role in moving this tion t 3emd the achievement of the Air Quality Program.
This will require extensive and rigorous trct-atun and air quality analysis to ensure that this
region does in fact decrease air pollution from mobile sources. We anticipate building a strong
partnership with the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Quality District in carrying out such a role.
Additionally, the eight CC+G's within the San Joaquin Valley will be unifying and coordinating
their roles to work more effectively as a unit, and protect local perogatives to the greatest extent
possible.
In response to the needs expressed by the business sector, the community and the state, the COG
will be taki n g * i is first steps into regional planning. These are steps that are not unfamiliar to
Or COG as it has assisted the county and cities in planning in the past. The challenge of this
new role will be to provide the forum t:) build a unified regional approach to growth and other
regional issues facing this county. We will be looking at the San Diego model as a possible
direction in which to go.
The Local - mp -1 2 aticn Authority will be completing its first Strategic Plan in the summer of
1992. Implementation of this plan will require a great deal of work on the part of the COG and
local government as we jointly begin to implement transportation facilities in the plan. There
will still be some major steps between the plan and the laying of concrete. We need to do the
engineering, design and right of way work for projects on the ground.
For transit and rail projects the time horizon may be longer, but the work for immediate
implementation will need to begin. In partnership with the Transit District and the cities, the
COG will be assisting in implementing those projects or facilities identified in the Strategic Plan.
A counh•wid(; transit plan hill be completedby July, 1992. Implementation of this plan will
require., great deal of efforton the part of the Stockton Metropolitan Transit District, the cities,
county and the COG. It is our intent that this is not just another plan, but when adopted this
beeares an ac im program in which to begin to implement expanded transit service throughout
this county. This will require difficult choices on the parts of board and local governments.
Ultimately it is hoped that such a transit plan can be put in place which will provide the most
efficient and cost effective method of providing transit in this county.
In 1992-93 we wilt be deeply involved in the efforts to provide rail service over the Altamont
Pass. While this is traditionally called a rail study, it will be evaluating all types of mass transit
over the Altamont Pass. It will be a major effort for this county and could set the direction for
rail serYice for years to -xxr-- . It has implications regarding high speed rail, rail service to the
Bay Area, and rail service to Sacramento.
This next year will also be a transitional year for our work in congestion management. Not only
does the Federal Transportatien Act require a Congestion Management Program, but the
Measure K Progran calls for a Growth Management Program very similar to the Congestion
Management Program. Coordinating and consolidating these programs irk one sucessful
program will be a major effort for this next year. We will be in our first year of implementing
the review process for the current Congestion Management Program. This in itself will require
a great deal of effort on the part of the COG staff as well as local government. In addition, we
will be looking at a more effective mititgation process to mitigate the congestion caused by
anticipated growth. Here too we will be looking at an expanded role for transit as a technique
for reducing the impacts of growth. This will be coupled with the investigation of new concepts
in reducing the e se of the existing highways.
In the area of data managment, this will be the first year that we will receive the majority of the
1990 census and have it available for use both graphically and in report form. We hope we cm
begin to market the data developed by the COG sv that this program can become a more useful
tool to both the public and private sectors in doing the analysis necessary in their operations.
The Ridesharing Program will experience even greater emphasis in this next year, and in the
future, as we begin to move people out of their single occupant automobile into carpools cr
vanpools. This becomes even more important as we attempt to deal with congestion and air
pollution. This program currently serves the four counties adjacent to San Joaquin as well as
San Joaquin County. Recently the program expanded its 800 phone network to serve as far south
as Tulare and Kings Counties. The challenge for this next year is to develop even more
innovative ways to get people tr) begin to utilize the carpools and van poo Is.
As a continuation of previous years' work the COG will also be providing technical services to
its member governments. While there is limited resources in this area the COG recognizes the
need to utilize its data resources and technical skills to assist the member agencies. These
services include preparation of plans, forecasting, grant preparation, legislative assistance,
modeling, and specific project assistance.
Finally, and very significantly, the COG will be preparing the Regional Transportation Plan.
Already the direction of this plan is responding to the issues of congestion and air quality. It
wEl evaluate alternate transportation modes for inclusion in the plan to achieve mobility without
sacrificing the quality of life.
San Joaquin Council of Governments offers an unusual opportunity. It. provides a forum for
local government iD deal With the issues of transportation, air quality, growth and their
interrelationships. It provides an opportunity for local governments, working tapther, to
effectively deaf with regional issues rather than have policy developed at a higher level. The:
decisions in the coming year Will be more controversial and froze difficult as resources at all
lemis become more scarce. Now note than ever it is imperative that local governments take
a broader look at policy setting tD ensure that all aspects of regional concerns are being
effectively dealt with.
From my short vantage point, I am convinced that the Board of Directors and staff can rn et this
challenge. Mjw bet-croe have I experienced a more unified local government, even with your
differences. it is my hope that we can build that unity into an effective fonm to deal with the
opportunities that lay ahead.
Yours very truly,
' S
BARTON R. . YS
Executive Director
al rd
RESOLUTION
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
URI 0 1 _.tji
R-92-62
RESOLUTION APPROVING COG'S 1992-93 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin County council of Governments serves as
the Regional Transportation Planning Agency, the Metropolitan
Planning Organization, the County Airport Land Use Commission as
well as other designations; and
WHEREAS, ,the COG annually prepares A work program depicting the
tasks that will be performed by the organization; and', _
WHEREAS, it is also essential that the COG prepare a budget
constrained by the resources available to it, to carry out and
fund the work scheduled for the coming year,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the San Joaquin County Coun-
cil of Governments does hereby approve the 1992-93 budget and
forward such to its member governments for their review and
ratification.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of April 1992 by the following
vote of the San Joaquin County Council of Governments, to wit:
AYES: Ennis, Escalon; Pennino, Lodi; B alsin ger, Manteca; Costa,
San Joaquin County; Simas, San Joaquin County; Freeman,
Lathrop; Bilbrey, Tracy; Rust, Stockton; Feichtmeir, Ripon.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Darrah, Stockton.
MAYOR DAVE ENNIS
Chaitman
� 1::
s
�
•
i
.
t
Era:
1
1
t
...........
i•
.
i
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
STAFF ALLOCATION
FiscalYear 1992-93
Position
Executive Director
Deputy Executive Director
Manager, Finance/Administration
And Public Information
Senior Regional Planner
Associate/Assistant Regional Planner
Commute Management Coordinator
Executive Secretary
Office Assistant I/II/Iil
Number
1
1
1
2
5
1
1
3
Fiscal Assistant i
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator 2
Student Intem 0.5
TOTAL 18.5
Full -Time Positions: 18
Part -Time Positions: .5
9
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
STAFF
Fiscal Year 1992-93
Name Position
Barton R. Ways
Executive Director
Andrew T. Chesley
Deputy Executive Director
Steven Dial
Manager, AnanceEAdministration
And Public information
GaryDickson
Senior Regional Planner
Vacant
Senior Regional Planner
Pc'terWilliams
Associate Regional Planner
Nay NVeir
Associate Regional Planner
Steven VanDenburgh
Associate Regional Planner
Debra Hale
Associate Regional Planner
Proposed
Assoc./Assistant Regional Planner
Susan Nejedly
Commute Management Coordinator
Rebecca Montes
Executive Secretary
Shirley de Esparza Ruiz
Office Assistant III
Kristine Dempewoit
Office Assistant 11
Laura Farley
Office Assistant If
Sharon Matthews
FiscalAssistant
Raul Garcia
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator
Donna Aftague
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator
Ha;yan Zhang
Student Intern
10
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS & SALARY SCHEDULE
Bt -WEEKLY
(Effective January 1, 1992)
Posliion
Executive Director
Deputy Executive Director
Manager, Finance/Administration
And Public Information
Senior Regional Planner
Associate Regional Planner
Commute Management Coordinator
Assistant Regional Planner
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator
Fiscal Assistant
Executive Secretary
Office Assistant Ill
Office Assistant II
Student I chem
Step
A B C D E
$3,192
$1,909
$2;010
$2,115
$2,227
$2,344
$1,574
$1,657
$1,744
$1.836
$1,928
$1,574
$1,657
$1,744
$1,836
$1,928
$1,364
$1,436
$1,511
$1,587
$1,666
$1,364
$1,436
$1,511
$1,587
$1,666
$1,243
$1,305
$1,371
$1,439
$1,511
$1,077
$1,131
$1,187
$1,247
$1,309
$1,013
$1,066
$1,122
$1,181
$1,243
$824
$867
$913
$961
$1,011
$811
$852
$894
$939
$986
$765
$805
$848
$892
$939
$7.50
M
Statistics
r• _ �
W
m
O
cn
O
Z C
69-
U—
�— c*3
m N
U3 C)
W Q3
cr V
Clli
Z
w LZU
0 0.
X Q
W
Z LU
om
Q cn
� Z
a� o
o�
1
Z
pC Z
H Q
'rr,'! �.� ' �*,'. � �'wx. . ;. ..z.,, f ..a'y„r;�� .'t , .,Q.a ii j X. •�
®�11111�11111>II�I�I�®I�1
��111111111�I®�I��i�t®1�
t
d
W 1-1
s
Z
r
O
•
~+
��■nnmmnm��nn�
s
$
X
O
S
g
3
—
J
o
15
�_�nnmumennnne
�_,■11��1�1���11111�1@��18
��■�1������1���1111�1�11�!
t
d
W 1-1
s
Z
r
O
•
~+
Z a-
s
$
X
O
S
g
3
—
J
o
15
inancial Plar.
5ummary
0
«?:
e nues
,
,: ,evenues
=
« c m< a» »< \ z }
\` ?
��
w.� .
San Joaquin Countv Council of Govemments
BUDGI SUMMA
Fiscal Year 1992-93
FY 1989-90 FY 199"1
FY 1991-92
FY 1991-92
FY 1992-93
Actual Actual
REVENUES
Estimated
Budget
Proposed
Federal is Q98.SO9 $40%133
tW'A' 84
Sm.5"
$810.700
sta12 Graft $2:,300
$4171400
$417.400
$406.000
Local 1'229188 5421.508
$1.070.500
$1.070.800
$020A00
Mterest $0,,�0 $1,251
53.07E
$12.157
$12.157
Other 52.E $103Aie
56.304
53.740
TOTAL $687.880 $1.101. 8
52,285.484
82.286A84
$2.165.700
JH�� <i tO
S502.423
$662.222
$717.155
$723.234
$244.106
542.120
524.472
$24 AW
5356.200
5257.622
$17.925
$29.630
$57.854
$67A72
584.750
$40.070
$0.443
$12.171
$21.108
$13.720
$1.666
53.07E
$12.157
$12.157
$13.060
56.304
53.740
$3.740
11451100
$8.800
$7.003
$13.092
$19.092
$1b,S30
$0
So
$o
$30.840
536.802
$0
SO
$0
$75
Wo
$0
$O
$0
$7,263
$3.500
$o
$o
$o
$14.962
51%000
$0
So
$o
$830
$1.500
$o
$o
$o
$2.886
$2.000
$8.904
$0.248
$"AM
$44.068
MGM
So
So
$100.000
$159.396
$24,000
Professional Services $219.070
Fixed Assets $10.718
$300.040
$2.1A"
$800.000
$".Sao
$1.187.400
$46.580
$1.041.000
$20.000
TOTAL $as1.256
$1.014.864
51.807, 16
$2.285.484
$2.188.517
Excess (D"cM Revenues ($1Q3,S76) S".832 $478.166 ($O) $183
40NW Exponditu "
17 (Rev.)
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
BUDGET SUMMARY
Fiscal Year 1992-93
FY 1989-90 FY 1990-91 FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93
Actual Actual Estimated Pr000sed
PZVENucS
Federal Grants
$339.509
$409.133
$797,584
$948,700
State Grants
$83.339
$86.300
$417,400
$405.000
Luca!
$229,166
$421,596
$1.070,500
$820.000
interest
$6.680
$1,251
$57,554
$54,750
Other
$8,986
5183,416
$12,171
$13.720
TOTAL "
$667,680
$1.101.696
$2,285.484
$2,165,700
EXPENDITURES
Salaries & Benefits
$508,423
$552.825
$717,155
$844.195
Services t Supplies
Office Expense
$17.925
528,630
$57,554
$54,750
Communications
$10,976
$9.443
$12,171
$13.720
Membemhips
$1.655
$3.877
$12157
$13,950
Maintenance - Equipment
35.384
53,740
$4.500
Rants & Leases - Equipment
46.660
$7,893
$13,092,
$15.320
Transportation & Traver
$14.415
$25,].31
$39,325
$47,442
Special District - Accounting Report
$0
$0
$60
$60
Allocated service Cost
$972
$2,153
$2,650
$3,500
Publications & Legal Notices
$607
$3,433
$14,962
$16,000
Insurance
$705
$721
$8,10
S1.500
Building Maintenance
$141
50
$400
$2.000
Renis - $true a Grounds
$8,904
59.245
$44.886
$60,780
Operating Reserve
so
50
$100,000
$24,000
Professional Services
$219.878
$3090640
$900,000
$1.043.800
Fixed Assets
$10,715
$23,455
$46,560
$20.000
TOTAL
$801.976
$981,830
$1,965.543
32.165.517
Excess (Do>Rcit) Revenues ($134,296) $119,866 $319,941 $183
OverExpenditures
17
I;1►;
I.
_!� ,a _
�,
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
REVENUE BUDGET WORKSHEET
FiscalYear 1992-93
FY 89.90 FY 90-91 FY 91-92 FY 92-93
Revenue Source
AcWW Actual
5280.000
Estimated
Proposed
FEDERAL GRANTS
State SubveMiorm
S83.339 $86,300 $85.800
$90,000
Stats Subveralon Carryover
U.S. D"Wt" nt of Transportation:
$15,000
Propoeitton 116
$300.000
$300,000
Federal Transit Ad radon (Ser: S MPO)
525,200
$21.600
$73,800
5108.300
Federal TransrT AdrnkftVa*m (lee- 25(A)(2)
SUBTOTAL
sm,166 $421,596 $1,070,500
$27.000
$16.400
Federal Highway Administration (Pte
$160,950
$208,843
5339,381
S45Q,000
Federal Highway Adt"Mitrubm (PIMA)
$6.827
Federal Highway Administration (PL Carryover)
5127,596
$80,000
Federal Highway Adrrvhtstrafon (Ridesharing)
$153,359
$178,690
5273,000
$280,000
SUBTOTAL
$339,509
5409,133
5797,584
$940,700
STATE GRANTS
$220.180 $238.180 $304.700
5280.000
calitarnia Departrnem of Transports =
$6,000
56,000
State SubveMiorm
S83.339 $86,300 $85.800
$90,000
Stats Subveralon Carryover
$31,600
$15,000
Propoeitton 116
$300.000
$300,000
NOTAL
$83,339 $86.300 $417,400
$405,000
ILS
Transportation Developnw t Act
$220.180 $238.180 $304.700
5280.000
Sen ,Joagadn county
$6,000
56,000
Local Transportation Authority
$723.000
$508,000
State Transit Arrstarsce
$6.000
$12.000
COG Fees
$5,000
$10.000
Me nbdr Jurisdictions
$6,700
54.000
Other
$8,986 $183.416 $19,100
SO
SUBTOTAL
sm,166 $421,596 $1,070,500
$820.000
OTHER
Interest $6,680
$1,251
So
So
Other $8,986
5183.416
S0
$0
SUBTOTAL 515,666
$184,667
SO
SO
TOTAL 5667,680 $1,101,696 $2.285,484 52,165,700
19
_ ! " � r"_.
t- ,
U)
�a
pfrd
o '-
U (D
..... 0
C
03
00
o�
U
O
zo
0 %
U
O
CD
6
c
U
cn
m
L
m
c
c
0
0
IL
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
EXPENDITURE BUDGET WORKSHEET -PERSONNEL
Fiscal Year 1992-93
Position
Annual
Earnings
REGLAAR POSITIONS
Benefit
Exacutlne Oi octot
$89.075
Dpuv okoclor
562.468
Mmmmjor. FinanCNAcknkL/Publio !n%r melon
551.376
Eno*** Ste►
$26.948
Offte AtaebWM M
522.148
0N1m AnbUM ■ (2)
$48,578
Fisoal Assistant
$33.131
Senior Plannwe (2) r
$ 5AS4
A t/kaocia� Plser»ns (�.(1 new pt»ttlon proposed)
$184.419
coennnAs imi -QanentvubSc kdonnatton Coordnatot
$41.256
Wdeslw ft Outreach coordnslw (2) VN"ming to convert from contract status)
$58.000
Regular Subtotal 1652.981
EXTRA HELP POsmoNs
Intern $10.400
Clsatoal $2.880
Extra Help Subtotal $13.060
TOTAL $668.041
Regular Salaries
Extra Help Salaries
Grupe Benefits
21
FY 89-90 FY 90-91 FY 91-92 FY 92-93
AckW Actual Estimate Proposed
$409.021 $474.303 $559.418
FY 85-90 FY 90-51 FY 91-92
FY 92-93
Benefit
Actud Actual Estimate
Proposed
X34A (15%)
S65.420
$88.577.
County Rattremsnt System
s7,3W
S7.=
cateoww
$15,958
$18.196
Cat Allowance
$3.600
$3.600
3odd Security
$3.689
$3.781
Social Secudwy Wedcars)
$4.659
$4.776
Group Der"
$3.192
$5,321
Group Ysdical
$27.223
542.500
Vision
5851
$588
Workers Compensation
$1.116
$1.250
Lbs Insurance
$434
SS27
iJm moptog.msnt Insurance (0.2%)
S885
51.332
TOTAL
599.402 $78.522 s134.395
s178.154
Regular Salaries
Extra Help Salaries
Grupe Benefits
21
FY 89-90 FY 90-91 FY 91-92 FY 92-93
AckW Actual Estimate Proposed
$409.021 $474.303 $559.418
$652.981
$23.402
$13.050
$99,402 $78.522 $134.335
5178.154
$508.423 $552.825 $717.155
$844.195
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
EXPENDITURE BUDGETWORKSHEET-SERVICES & SUPPLIES
Fiscal Year 1992-93
Line Sub-
FY W90 FY 90.91 FY 91-92
FY 92-93
flare Aoo't Title
Una Item Oescriptlon
Actual Actual Estimated
Proposed
201 0000 Office Expense - Cenral
Ganeal Suppias
$28.830 $67554
$24.000
208 0000 Conwin Paeft Self - Ridesharing
Printing .
$2280
$10.000
-Equtp/Ft -
wC COnVOtalong Distanp
$iS00
$10,000
Comp~ Somme
$9.443 $12.171
mow
209 0000 Nag /beoolRO9. Councils
Nanaoku
$3.000
i0
Ottloe Expenes - Genial Subtbtai
$100
$41.145
$37.500
$600
Amer. Assoo./Pubio Admin.
202 0000 OMoe Expanse - Postage
Postage
$17.000
OHfoe Experwe - Postage Subtolai
$14.209
$17.000
203 0000.OMiea Expecte - SubrwWons I W in do & Periodleab
00" Expense - Subearodan Sublets$
cm
5250
OFFICE EXPENSE - SUBTOTAL $17.925
$28.830 $67554
$64.750
208 0000 Conwin Paeft Self - Ridesharing
$2280
AT&T - Rtdasharing
$1.440
wC COnVOtalong Distanp
$10,000
Connmink atlons - Subtotal $10.974
$9.443 $12.171
$13.720
209 0000 Nag /beoolRO9. Councils
$3.000
CalAct
$100
W City Mgrs Assoc.
$600
Amer. Assoo./Pubio Admin.
$100
CalC00
$4.100
Arne: Piano ing Assoc.
$800
Assoc. of Connrnuuw Trans.
$500
Stockton Chamber of Comm.
$250
Modesto Cl:wnbw of Corn n.
$230
Reg. Courted MgWL Syat User Grp.
$2.500
SON FlaiP COUMS s Coaidon
$1.500
MisedanOous
5250
Memberships - Subtotal S1.65S
$3.877 $12.157
513.960
211 0000 Maattenance - Equiprrtant Office Equipr""pkrtem/Prf %n $4.500
Mainbnanew - EquOmwd - Subtotal SS.384 53.740 64.500
214 0000 Rants & Leasee - Equipment Copiw
Copia (norn)
FaosbnBO Machine
Postage Machine
54.200
$2.600
51.920
22.520
Varian Rideshara Eveni Rentais $2.000
Rents & Leases - Eauipm*m - Subtotal $6,660 $7.893 $13.092 $15.320
22
217 0000 Transport &m 6 Trawl Statewide Rldcshare MNtinp
$3,000
DOT TrahMg Coarses 2 pereons/mseting
SIAM
Caltram Train<ng Workshops 4 persons/meeting
$1.000
Mileage Aeknbursement for Persond Cars
$3.000
Med Rsknbwserrrettis for Required Meetings
$3.000
CAICOG Meati -10 persons/meetirV
$5,000
krt'I Mi4ounly MwmWm ret Assoc.
Nalwat Cmde►ence - Rana. NV - i pw wWmtg
81.500
kttennodd Pbmning GroW - i person/mtg
Slim
RTPA/CTC/30 Help CoWNk m -12 pereon/mectkgs
$2.000
NaCl Assoc. of Regbnd Coulcils -
5 personUmog - WA of stab
PAW
Western Lead*W* ktstihuM - 3 persomhme5ng
33.000
Ml ceaanows MMtkgs wlMh St to
$1.000
Dinmr McN[ng for COG Board or Executive Com. (4.6)
Am
Executive Committee Retreat
$1,500
Transportation 1$ Travel - 8ubtoW $14.415 .$25.131.
r
. $39,225. *34.100
.
216 0000 Transportation A Trawl = Other Motor Pod
*250 .
F1irleshare hwmfves
$900
Transit Fares
$312
Transportation & Travel - Odw - Subtotal
$100 $1.462
TRANSPORTATION A TRAVEL - SUBTOTAL 514.415 $25.131 $30.325 $35.562
220 0010 Spedd District - Accoure q Report County Auditor Reports $60
Special District - Amounting Repoli - Subtotal $60 $60-
220 0200 Allocated Service Cost SJC Services
AAocated Samics Cost - Subtotal $972 $2.153 $2.850 $3.500
223 0000 Publications 3 Legal Notices Job Announcements
Legal Notices
$1.000
$15.000
Publications 3 Legal Notices - Subtotal $607 ' $3.433 314.982 $16.000
232 0000 Workers Compensation kutuance Workers Compensation $1.250
Workers Compensadon Insurance - Subtotal SW2 $.1.250
236 0000 Casually insurance $250
Casualty Insurance - Subtotal $178 $250
INSURANCE SUBTOTAL $705 $721 $830 $1.500
260 0000 Suildkg Maintenance Minor buildingmaintenance at HSA
Suidirp Maintenance - Subtotal $141 $400 $2.000
23
264 0000 Rents - Structures i Grounds Offices at HSA $60,480
Poking St 1.680
miscotisneoue 5300
Rents - Syucbx" '. Grounds - %biolj S8.9" $9.245 S44.8W 572.680
Operafng iieserve Cond uie Building Operating Rosorve 24000
Operating Reserve - SubWW 100000 24000
TOTAL S'ERHICES Z SUPPLIES 562.960 $95,910 $301.827 $257.522
24
Sari Joaquin County Council c' Governments
EXPENDITURE BUDGET WORKSHEET -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Fiscal Year 1992-93
Lie"
FY 9"1
Ac~b
FY 91 m
Mm work ew wnt NojPro d Dataiption
cores -ft"
Pr2po"d
W
«
0220 PROFESSIONAL SSTY=3
mmmw
$219:878
80101Tnnrpoetakn Plan
$1.133;800
$40.000
801.02-ftowwl p1ww isq Studlea
hate 12 Study; SJC Egxmwex Study
$152.700.
801M -t-6 SWdy
CoMkxW kom pewioui Yew
- Z20.000
802O14Re0wW TrarwpoeWm bVmvw wnt ProOmn
SC
803.01--R4ad i Street bbr+i0 wq
VeNde Occupancy Counts:CordoyScn
537.500
803O24mmIt Coord nedon .
s0
IM03-Trwmpwftdm Air Owft
$D
80301-Traewpott m Air Oue ty Mo ft"
Tmraportstion ModN knprowmanb
$586300
603.06- MW4M TMmk AftWm *
$18.800
701.01 Techrkel MOW=
s0
601.01-krtarQov�errwr8ai coardirwition
$p
801.02-ftjw%" i Fcracasb
s0 .
601.00 -Airport Land the Conrcnis m
s0
601 AM-Conpeetlon MarrQernent
t0
901.1-Meman K
Pn wadon of requkad plans.
$30.000
901.02-Jltbre+oru Sturdy
P+rsons. DaLmm
5548.000
1001.01-CO0 OWP
TXEntwWW*4MMS
$35.000
1001 A2 -TOA Adnan Wvdon
S0
1001.03 -Cor minity Wvoiw nw t
Pdn*V. COGN12E
$7.500
1101.01-•Mahwhy
Commut r Program Promotons
$100.000
COMPARISON OF PRIOR YEAR TOTALS
FY MM
ACWd
FY 9"1
Ac~b
FY 91-92
FY 91-92
FY 92-90
-
W
«
Estee
mmmw
$219:878
5309.640
$1.133;800
$900.000
$1.043.800
25