HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 21, 1990 (36)0
F. T
l..
HOARSE TALES FROM THE NATURE TRAIL
w
LODI LAKE NATURE AREA DOCENT NEWSLETTER February 1990
111E PRE: SEZ:
I often take a wall: through the Lodi Lake Wilderness Area to be inspired by
the sight and touch of the uncontrolled growth that abow'xis. One pathway
through the meadow was so enticing to me became the grape vines and black-
berries closed in the path so much that it became an eerie and uncanny feeling
to walk that way. I felt touched i rand I wa, reminded of my aLUdhocd
when I walked in the woods of Washington, caning so close to living green life.
I used hand shears to carefully cut back some vines that might touch my face or
be in the way of school children who were being taken on tours by docents. The
area was rough and untouched, and I sensed a pioneer or an Indian walking
through this wild, untouched growth that made me think of being the first to
emerge on this new solitary wonder. I envisioned how the first man on the moon
mist have felt, and I remembered the statemw.-its of school children as they
discovered this environment away from sidewalks and plaster yet so close to the
chirp of binds.
I could go on, but I have another story to tell, one I have put off writing
about for many days as it is the opposite of the previous paragraph.
I walked to an area where several docents and dignitaries cnorated the
completion of the amphitheater with a plaque and a visit by Phil Isenberg, a
place where docents planted a valley oak tree last Arbor Day. Two deer pranced
before thou after the planting. The valley oak, one inch in diameter, was
hacked to the ground. My first thought was vandalism.
Walking along the path beside the drainage dick, I became aware of much
RLIAL more destruction to the wilderness. Just north of where the drain pump is
located, a 12 -foot wide swath to the river was made where a little path
Previously led you by sedges to the river. Rhis swath uncovered the wi.ldernes--,
` rem^ving the quiet and interesting path it once was. Continuing the path along
the flitch, I noticed a 30 -foot wide swath was cut from the ditch and encroaching
into the willows where I make a stop to discuss how the Indians would use the
leaves of the willow for tea to reduce pain and the limbs for baskets. The
Indians were always careful to not take any more than they could use or would
not raise dust while walling on the floor of the forest.
Now the scene becomes one of stumps of willows showing where the chainsaws
hacked them arra left stimmps the length of the ditch. Young oaks and silver
willow- were just be3innirx3 to grow. These, too, were cut. Over 150 species of
birds have been identified by members of the Audubon Society but are now exposed
by the clearing of these swaths and the encroachments upon the protective
covering of the wilderness. Stumps, logs, and debris were stacked at the Jerry
Arman Jameson memorial bench. Number 4 stop has 12 stumps gawking at us as we
show what is left of the willows. It truly is a lesson on haw man can destroy.
Trash covers stumps 16 inches across, and grape vines more than one inch in
diameter now lie loose where they will not .grow anymore. Here is the swath that
is 45 feet in width, amxi it cuts into the protective bird covering. We have
previ«Lsly told LIUldren how the natives picked grapes and berries to preserve
for winter food. These were also for the benefit of birds and insects. We can
now show the htmd liating rape of the w1ldern6,ss. Everywhere there are signs of
destruction.
Man has tried to change one of the last preserves of wilderness to a
parkway. It has been opened to where more cats, dogs, anti man can invade the
wildlife protection. People once lived in hones, lived off the land; their main
diet was of a(mms. They searched for and protected every living plant, animal.,
insect, and bird so that future families could survive.
The docents bo voltumteer their time to show school children and the public
a place a -way from concrete and plaster will continue to be active but will now
find it difficult to provide the atmosphere of untouched natural beauty that was
once taken for granted.
Dale....
Yr.
50
1819. gewood Dr.
Lodi, CA 95240
Phone -(209) 369-6724
TO: Park and Recreation Commission, City oY Lodi
FROM: Joyce N. Sullivan
DATE: January 30, 1990 _
SUBJECT: Destruction of Lodi Lake Mature Area habitat, lack
of a protection policy, and' thee -related problems.
In December 1989 Lodi Park and Recreation Department cut
and removed approximately 20% of the plant habitat in the Lodi
Lake Nature Area. I asked the Department spokesperson for an
explanation for this action and I was told that it was done
for "fire protection".
Next, I wrote a letter of inquiry to.Fire Chief Larry
Hughes and asked him what the Lodi Fire Department's fire
protection policy is for the Nature Area. Through our corres-
pondence, dated December 26% January 2, and January 61 and
through discussions and through a tour of the area by Fire
Administrative Officer Larry Lorenz, I've discovered that
far more habitat was removed than was necessary to meet the
fire protedtion requirement.
In my view, the Fire Department policy for the Nature
Area is reasonable and it is a responsible policy. The Park
and Recreation Department's action was neither responsible or
reasonable.
I have assumed that the Park and Recreation Department
was charged with the responsibility to protect and retain
the Nature Area in its natural state. Instead of protection,
the Commission has permitted destruction.
Obviously, the interpretation for the meaning of protect-
ing and retaining the Nature Ar•3a in its natural state, has
been left to employees' individual definition. This situation
is unreasonable.
Has the Commission ever developed a written policy state-
ment for the Nature Area? Without a written policy for this
unique park, the Commission is not assuming direct responsibil-
ity for what happens there.
The aesethetics of the area has been reduced considerably.
In fact, it's downright ugly where it has been cleared, not to
mention the drastic reduction of habitat for wildlife. By
reducing habitat, you have effectively gotten rid of a great
deal of wildlife. Without the food and shelter provided by
habitat, much of the wildlife must leave the area to survive.
We can do better; I, tnerefore, recommend the following:
RECOI-TIE70ATIO S:
Live Science Consultant-SuServisor - Currently, the Park
and Recreation Department has no one on its staff who is quali-
fied or knowledgeable about wildlife or plant habitat. The
Continued - ge 2
area has been maintained like a traditional city park which has
caused great destruction to its natural state over the years.
The landscape architect hired and paid thousands of dollars
in consultant work on the Nature Area and other parks is skilled
in his work for traditional parks and golf courses. However, it's
been my observation thatWis not trained or knowledgeable about
how to retain a nature area in its natural state. This takes a
knowledgeable person in the natural sciences..
Furthermore, it's been my observation that no current or
past Commission member has credentials or is knowledgeable in
live sciences.
Poor decisions are made when knowledge is lacking.
Therefore, I recommend that the Park and recreation Depart-
ment hire a live science person and use the consultant services
to write a protection and retention policy for the Wildlife Area.
This person should supervise over all actions in regard to this
specific park.
ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS
During the past several years, I've researched many problems
in our Nature Area. Many actions by the Park and Recreation
Department have worked against the purpose of retaining the area
in as natural state as possible.
In April 1985, the Lodi Park and Recreation Department cleared
a great deal of plant habitat from the Nature Area in the name
of Mosquito Abatement and Fire Protection. This explanation was
given to me by the City Manager, in response to my letter writt$n
vo the City Council, objecting to the amount of habitat removed.
I began some research. I spoke with the County Mosquito
Abatement Administrator, Mr. Jack Fiori. His description for
abatement requirements in vhe Nature Area was reasonable. In
my opinion, the Park Department removed far more habitat than
was necessary.
The over -zealous clearing by the Park Department has hist-
orically caused much ill will in the community. Many people
have incorrectly thought that the County Mosquito Abatement and
Lodi Fire Department have been msponsible for ordering the huge
amounts of habitat removed rather than the Park Commission.
The Commission must be held accountable in these matters. To
do less would be shirking your responsibilities to the City
Council and to the public. I would hope these problems could
be solved in the spirit of cooperation rather than in confront-
ation.
1. PARK PAROL V'=ICL�S
many of yy walk: in the 1� az-;re Area have been
interrupted by t. -.e Park Patrol cruising 7.n their cars on the path-
Continued - i e 3
2.
r
wags. I have had to get off the paths so their car
could drive through. I've observed many other adults
and young toddlers scurry off the paths for the cars,
too.
These vehicles are a nuisance for pedestrians.
They raise dust during the dry seasons, they cause
stress on the environment, and they are inefficient.
I recommend that the Park Patrol use bicycles
in the Nature Area. They're more cost effective and
cause less stress on the environment. They would raise
little dust, lessen the nuisance for pedestrians, and
the patrollers could complete their duties more -quickly.
Several creative programs have been developed by
the Parks and Recreation Department for our youth.
'.,could it be possible for the department to develop
Youth Patrol units for tho Nature Area?
:iERBICIDE USE
I have observed the Park maintenance crews using
herbicides on the norther side of the levy to get rid
of most of the plant life.
Wild grapes and several almond trees grow there.
Many people eat the ripened grapes and almonds. The
very toxic herbicide spray is consumed by an unaware
public. The wildlife that consumes the sprayed plant
life must be affected too.
The fire department claims it never orders use of
herbicides in its fire protection policy. Also, they
do not require plant removal for the side of the levy.
Why does the Park and Recreation Department use herbi-
cides in the Nature Area? Why hasn't the department
warned the public?
The removal of plant life from the side of the
levy has caused soil erosion there. Before this pract-
ice began, I observed very little soil erosion on the
side of the levy because the natural plant life flourish,-
ed
lourish-ed there.
3. -REMOVAL OF DEAD _HABITAT
It's ironic that the Docent program for the school
children teaches the little ones not to remove a single
thing from the Nature Area when touring there, not even
fallen acorns or leaves, and yet, the Park Maintenance
people have removed thousands of pounds of dead habitat.
Dead habitat serves a very important function to
a natural eco -system. Removal of these materials deter-
iorates the system. TILe Commission s:ould become inform -
about these matterSt.
Continued - F ;e 4
4. REvjj0VAL OF UABITAT FROM THE SOUTH BANK OF RIVER
I resent the fact that my tax dollars are spent
on removing the fallen trees, etc, along the south
river bank bordering the Nature Area. Believe it or
not, most of this material provides excellent rip rap
for the prevention of bank errosion. This important
habitat also serves a vital purpose for fish and
wildlife. The Commission is responsible for removing
this free natural rip rap that helped to reduce bank
erosion. What a waste!
}
f
During this past week I.saw a City Public Works
Department crew clear a wide swath of habitat from
the riverbank. This occured where the drain pipe
empties the stream water into the river..
After they removed the natural rip rap, they
dumped several loads of large pieces of cement on the
river bank side. According to one employee, this
was done to prevent bank erosion!
It was o'hvious to me that the blackberries, wild
grapes, small trees, and shrubs they removed served
as an excellent deterrent to bank erosion until they
mowed it all down. It looked to me like someone was
trying to create needless busy work or was trying
to get rid of unwanted broken chunks of cement. This
looks ugly. I'd rather see natural plant growth as
opposed to cement serve as rip rap any day.
Again, I recommend that you consult with experts.
I'm not an expert in any of these areas, but I've read
enough studies on these subjects to know that the
people ordering much of the aetvities in our Nature
Area, in the name of maintenance, are no experts either.
5. ASPHALT USED FOR INFILL
Crushed asphalt has been used to fill in depress-
ions on a dirt path. Also, large broken chunks of
asphalt has been usel to fill in a cave-in near Pigs
Lake. Broken asphalt is a damaging material for a
natural environment. Natural materials such as rock
and sand should be used. Your policy for the Nature
Area should ban further use of such materials there.
6. ACCESS
When we built our home in 1967 on Edgewood Dr.
we walked to the Mokelumne River regularly near Pigs
Lake. The private owners didn't seem to mind the
public using this access. When the city purchased the
land our access to the river continued. Our access
stopped after twenty years when the decision was made
to close off the Le3ee Court access to everyone except
emer:-ency vehicles and for special events like the
r',
Continued - ge 5
Triathalon. .I never dreamed that the access at Pigs
Lake would one day be closed to me in my old age when
I first started using it twenty years ago. I strongly
object.
Many people who use to walk in the Nature Area
from my neighborhood hardly walk there anymore because
of the lack of convenient access.
It may not have been the intention of the decision
makers to discourage people from walking in the Nature
Area when they closed off the ZeBec.Court Access, but
that's what they accomplished by their action.
I strongly recommend that the foot path access
gate at Le Bee Court be reopened to the public and
that the vehicle gate be kept locked. The foot path
gate should be locked and opened daily by the Lodi
Lake Park employee who manages the main gate entrance
for Lodi'`Lake Park and on the same schedule. j
7. FISHING
A father of two young boys was told by the Park
Patrol that they could not fish in the Mokelumne River
from the Nature Area. I was shocked when he told me
this because I've never seen a no fishing sign for
the area and I've observed many people fishing there
over the years. To my knowlege; the State Fish and
Game hasn't prohibited fishing from there.
What is the official policy for fishing in the
Nature Area? What is the policy for fishing in Pigs
Lake or Lodi Lake?
CONCLUSIONS
Thank you for taking valuable time from your schedules in
considering my concerns for the Nature Area.
I would be happy to answer any questions you may have or
to discuss solutions with you for these problems. I am firmly
convinced,that through cooperation, solutions can be found.
Very truly yours,
Joyce N. Sullivan
cc: Lodi City Council
Lodi Fire Ciof, Larry -Hughes
San Joaquin County Mosquito Abatement Department, Jack Fiori
LUSD Docent ?rogram, Jay Bell
CFdli Reeneadort Depdntmerif
FEA 0 7 '9u
January 31, 1990
Mrs. Joyce Sullivan
1919 Edgewood
Lodi, CA 95240
Dear Joyce:
City Mara$er•s Uttice
Met with Fire Chief Larry Hughes, City Manager Tom Peterson and
Parks and Recreation Director Ron Williamson to discuss your concerns
about the Nature Area.
As you are aware, I had explained to you that much of the cutting
done at the Nature Area was in response to the Lodi Fire Department's
request for a "maintained" 12' wide and 12' high path. Attached is a
copy of their letter to me on which I acted.
Our current budget does not allow us the manpower to do this kind
of clearance in the Nature area. Therefore, I had arranged with the
California Conservation Corps to trim the Nature Area in compliance with
the Lodi Fire Department requirements. As I have been explaining to
those who have asked, our crews acted on their previous understanding
that a 20' clearance was needed to obtain a 12' "maintained" fire trail.
The 20' clearance is required as we are only able to get free labor
from the California Conservation Corps on a once -a -year basis. This, I
believe, is the crux of our problem as I now am planning to maintain the
Nature Area more frequently once new standards are set, to allow for a
narrower path thus removing the need to make the cuts we did this year.
I have consulted our files which show the original design calls for
20' paths in the Nature Area. This plan was drawn and adopted June 1,
1977, so it has been the practice according to my crews that we have
trimmed the paths this wide for some twelve years. We did not prune
last year as the Lodi Fire Department and Mosquito Abatement District
waived their requirements. Subsequently, I received the above
mentioned letter and also verbal requests from Mosquito Abatement.
Contrary to what you may have heard, there were several fires in
the Nature Area last year. In addition, there was one riot and attached
is a letter from the Lodi Police Department who will be conducting
exercises in the Nature Area with the S . W . A. T . team to respond to future
problems.
Obviously, this puts me in the rather untenable position of trying
to satisfy various agencies' needs which are contrary to my own
efforts and the efforts of the docents to keep this area in a natural
state.
125 NORTH STOCKTON STREET & LODI, CALIFORNIA 952.0 • TELEPHONE (209) 333 - 6742
Page 2 - continued January 31, 1990
I have met with Jay Bell and have given him the Morris do Wenell
plans which are currently the only standards of maintenance under
which our crews have operated. I have sent memos/letters to the
various agencies asking for their exact requirements in the Nature
Area. Copies of this information are enclosed. My hope is to somehow
blend all of these various requirements into a written plan whereby 1
can act without constantly being the referee between all of these
agencies and concerned citizens. My answer is to increase maintenance
dollars for the Nature Area to allow for more frequent cutting thus
allowing the removal of a minimal amount of foliage.
I would welcome your input through Jay Bell and the docents or
please feel free to contact me directly. I will be happy to show you
our current standards and work with you to address your concerns.
SB: srb
Encl.
cc: Ron Williamson, Director Parks do
Jay Bell, Lodi Lake Docents
Sincerely yours,
Scott Essin
Parks Superintendent
Recreation 1/
aeo& Panka & Recuatlart Depantment
February 19 1990
Mr® Jay Bell
335 Louie Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
Subject: Spring/Summer Nature Tours at Lodi Lake
Dear Jay:
As we discussed, the Parks and Recreation Department will be
initiating Spring and Summer tours at Lodi Lake's,Nature Area.
It is anticipated that;.these-tours:would-occur Thursday evenings
near dusk and Saturday, mornings early., We`.',would-.;tiegin in April
and go until September
We will need to list the tours ir. the Parks and Recreation
Summer/Fall Program brochure. I received the attached schedule
from Dale Sumersille, who is putting this brochure,*together.
Could you submit to me before February 7, 1990, how you
would propose to conduct this program and your costs to the City
so we can get this information to Dale Sumersille for inclusion
in the brochure.
Sincerely yours,
oil,
Scott Essin
Parks Superintendent
SE:srb
cc: Dale Sumersille, Recreatio Supervisor
Ron Williamson, Director
125 NORTH STOCKTON STREET LODI, CALIFORNIA 95240 • TELEPHONE (209)333-6742
L.1
February 5,.1990
Mr. Scott Essin
Parks Superintendent
Lodi Parks and Recreation Department
SubJect: Spring/S% er Nature Tours at Lodi Lake
Dear Scott:
Kathy and I have always shared Ron's and your enthusiasm
about public tours of the Nature Area on Thursday evenings
and Saturday mornings. We are Interested in the fact that
the city is going to now Initiate the tours.
We are, however, very concerned about the current state of
affairs relating to the Nature Area and its possible future.
At this time, Kathy and I do not feel comfortable about
committing ourselves further to the area. We also hesitate
to have the public continue to identify us with the area
until we realize exactly what the plans for It are and what
our input will be to realize those plans.
We might also suggest that now Is possibly not an opportune
time to approach the docents about the project. This is
only an Impression on our part and you may decide in favor
of addressing the docent council at our next meeting,
Thursday. February 8, 7 - 9 P.M. about this project.
Sincerely yours,
1
Jay and Kathy Bell
z/cc: Ron Williamson, Director Parks and Recreation
February 5, ,1990
Mr. Scott Essin
Parks Superintendent
Lodi Parks and Recreation Department
Subject: Lodi Lake Nature Area Maintenance Plan
Dear Scott:
Thank you for Including me In the Input stage of, planning
for the future maintenance of the Nature Area. Also thank
you for what Is my best map of the area.
As you know, most of the work that I do concerning the
nature area is on my own volunteer time. There was a period
when I was allotted a couple hours every two weeks of school
district time. That, unfortunately is not the case at
present. Unfortunately, many of my volunteer hours were
wasted by the overgrooming of the nature area last year and
this year.
Therefore, I am constrained to hold up my progress until
!larch Ist when the school district has sheduled me a day for
special projects, during which I will work on the map.
Thank you for your cooperation and patience.
Sincerely yours,
�
Jay ell
✓ccs Ron WIIIIamson
CITY COUNCIL
1OHN it. (Randv) SNIDER. Maw
DAVID M HINCHMAN
Morro► Pro Tempore
EVELYN M. OLSON
JAMES W. PINKERTON. Ir
FRED M. REID
E. J. McCaughna
Principal
Lawrence School
721 Calaveras Street
Lodi, CA 95240
Dear Mr. McCaughna:
CITY OF LLD I
CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET
CALL BOX 3006
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95.41-1910
(209) 334-5634
Tf IECOPIER Qm) 331.6 95
February 23, 1990
THOMAS A PETERSON
Ctty Manager
ALICE M REIMCHF
Ctty Clerk
BOB MCNATT
City Attorney
Please be advised that your February 5, 1990 letter expressing your
concerns regarding the Lodi Lake nature area was presented to the Lodi
City Council at its regular meeting of February 21, 1990.
The Council asked that this be a topic of review at a future Informal
Informational (Shirtsleeve) Session. The nature area tour by the City
Council and staff has been scheduled for 7:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 24,
1990. The City Council certainly appreciates your concern and looks
forward to your joining the group on that date.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call this
office.
Very truly yours,
-'lice M. Reimche
; its• Clerk
/IMP./ jmp
CITY COUNCIL THOMAS A PETERSON
JOH14 it (Randv) SNIDER. Maya CITY 4 L O D I City Manager
DAVID M HINCHMAN ALICE M REIMCHE
Maya Pro Tempore CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET City Clerk
EVELYN M. OLSON CALL BOX 3006 BOB MCNATT
JAMES W. PINKERTON. Jr. LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 City Attorney
FRED M. REID (209) 334-5634
1ELICOPIER (209) 333.6795
February 23, 19,00
Ms. Joyce Sullivan
1819 Edgewood Drive
Lodi, CA 95240
Dear Ms. Sullivan:
Please be advised that your January 30, 1990 letter expressing your
concerns regarding the Lodi Lake nature area was presented to the Lodi
City Council at its regular meeting of February 21, 1990.
The Council asked that this be a topic of review at a future Informal
Informational (Shirtsleeve) Session. The nature area tour by the City
Council and staff has been scheduled for 7:00 a.n.., Tuesc.,y, April 24,
1990. The City Council certainly appreciates your concern and looks
forward to your joining the group on that date.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call this
office.
Very truly yours,
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
ANR/jm
February 5, 1990
Lodi Parks and Recreation Commissioner:
Attached is a copy of the front page of our Lodi Nature
Area Docent Council Newsletter for February. The article
written by our President on the front expresses the Council's
deep concern and chagr_n regarding the conduct of those involved
in the leveling of a great deal of the Nature Area trail.
As you knog there are stops aor_g the trail marked with
numbered posts that point out unique features and sights of
interest. Many of these posts are now standing by themselves
because the indicated features were destroyed by the cleaning
crew. Even some rare plants and trees planted by members of
our Council were destroyed.
Needless to say, we are deeply disappointed, At one time
we were assured that we would be invited to accompany any
cleanup crew to point out features that need to be preserved.
Evidently these promises were not sincerely given.
We are hoping that your group will be aware of our concerns
and will 'help us to preserve what is left of a very unique
natural phenomenon.
',fie will appreciate your investigation of this matter
with those responsiblefcr t:^.is actior_.
E.J. McCaug:sa
Spokesperson
Lodi Mature .area Docent Council