The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - December 4, 1991 (54){ OF CITY OF LODI 14 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Consider initiating the annexation/reorganization proceedings for Neuharth North Addition located on the east side of South Stockton Street, north and south of Almond Drive MEETING DATE: December 4, 1991 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION That the City Council consider initiating the annexation/ reorganization proceedings for Neuharth North Addition located on the east side of South Stockton Street, north and south of Ahnmd Drive. BACKGROUND ll4(F&IAJ ON The proposed Neuharth North Addition encompasses 10 parcels with 8 owners and contains approximately 60 acres. The proposed annexation was originally presented to the City Council as three projects: (1) Neuharth- Morimoto development; (2) Colvin Ranch project and (3) Bangs Ranch project. I t was presented in that fashion because of the multiple ownerships and the desire of each project to develop without relying on adjacent parcels. However, the area can be annexed as one unit which will save the City time and effort and the property owners money. A t its meeting of November 20, 1991 the City Council adopted Ordinances 1535, 1536 and 1538 which prezoned the subject parcels R-2, Single -Family Residentia! or PD(28), Planned Development District No. 28, as requested by Baumbach and Piazza, Inc. on behalf of the property owners. The prezoning is required by San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission and is the first step in the annexation process. Since the annexation/reorganization did not have 100 percent owner consent, the staff published the necessary 20 -day notice on November 14, 1991. The City Council can initiate the annexation if it so desires. FUNDING: Application fees. Community Development Director JBS/cg Attachments APPROVED: '1' _It. er� THOMAS A. PETERSON 404 7 City Manager `eGyCed vapv J CGt CCCD91.46/TXTD.0IC NEL1114)MI NPP,'-# ADDITION 0,? 6,#Nl ZR -ION 2) Y I I N r- � r- /V R N LANE RESOLUTION NO. 91-223 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED "NEUHARTH NORTH ADDITION", INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI WHEREAS, this proposal 1s made pursuant to the Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organization is the annexation to the City of Lodi of a combined area comprising 60 acres more or less adjacent to the City limits located on the east side of South Stockton Street, north and south of Almond Drive; and withdrawal of said 60 acres from the Woodbridge Fire District and the Northern San Jaaquin Water Conservation District, located within the area to be annexed to the City of Lodi, 14668 North Stockton Street, APN 062-060-04, 14758 North Stockton Street, APN 062-060-12, 3861 East Almond Drive, APN 062-060-13, 3933 and 3891 East Almond Drive, A W S 062-060-14, 15 (Wilbert Ruhl property), 14114 North Stockton Street, APN 062-290-01, 3820 East Almond Drive, APN 062-060-30, 3886 East Almond Drive, APN 062-060-31, 3910 East Almond Drive, APN 062-060-32, and 3936 East Almond Drive, APN 062-060-33, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are affected, and; WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi and detached from the Woodbridge Fire District and the Northern San Joaquin Water Conservation District is cninhabited; and WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by this reorganization, and; WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows: (1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban confines of the City and will generate service needs substantially similar to that of other incorporated urban areas which require municipal government service; (2) Annexation to the City of Lodi of the subject area will result in improved economics of scale in government operations while improving coordination in the delivery of planning services; (3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of San Joaquin will benefit from the proposed reorganization as a result -1- of savings to the County by reduction of County required services in unincorporated but urban oriented area; (4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi is geographically, socially, economically and politically part of the same urban area of which the City of Lodi is also a part; (5) The subject area is within the Lodi Sphere of Influence; (7) Future inhabitants in the subject area will gain i rrmred i a to response in regard to police and fire protection, unlimited City garbage and trash collection service, street lighting service, a modern sewer system, other municipal services, and improvement of property values; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lodi City Council that the r San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the proposed "Neuharth North Addition" which includes annexation of a combined 60 acres, and detachment from the Woodbridge Fire District and the Northern San Joaquin Water Conservation District as described in Exhibit A attached hereto. This all subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions. Dated: December 4, 1991 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 91-223 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held December 4, 1991 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Pennino, Sieglock, Snider and Pinkerton (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None {Ylice M.,,Reimche �F kt-) City Clerk G 91-223 RES91223/TXTA.02J -2- C2 C3 C�0 0D C� 10 0C�1C�C�G' BAUMBACH & PIAZZA, mc. ., 323 West Elm Street Lodi, California 95240 Phone(209)368-6618 REVISED DECEMBER 2, 19511 NOVEMBER 26, 1991 JOB NO. 9196 JOB NO. 90155 JOB NO. 9003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR NEUHARTH NORTH ANNEXATION A portion of the West half of the East half of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian including portions of Lots 14 and 15 of A. J. Larsons Subdivision of the Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian as filed in Volume 2 of Maps and Plats, page 4 San Joaquin County Records being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the South line of the North seven acres of said Lot 15 and the East line of Stockton Street (40 feet wide); thence easterly 661.55 feet along the South lines of the Guthmiller Reorganization, the Geweke Reorganization, and the Geweke East Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolutions 3795, 3928 and 3978 respectively to the East line of said Lot 15: thence southerly along the West line of the Geweke Addition No. 3 Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 4332, 434.36 feet to the Southwest corner thereof being the Southeast corner of said Lot 15; thence continue southerly along the West line of the Noma Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 81- 68, 863.45 feet to the Southwest corner thereof; thence easterly along the South line of the Noma Reorganization 33 feet more or less to the Northwest corner of the Tandy Ranch Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 80-36; thence southerly along the West line of said Tandy Ranch Reorganization 909.10 feet more or less to the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 13; thence easterly along the South line of said Northeast quarter, 302.96 feet; thence along the West line of the Johnson Hanch Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution 79-138, southerly 1088.75 feet to the Southeast corner 'of the Bangs property as described in San Joaquin County Records, Instrument No. 91064368; thence westerly 995 feet along the South line of the Bangs property to the East line of Stockton Street; thence northerly along the East line of Stockton Street being the East line of the Salas Park Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution 4084, 1085 feet to the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 13; thence easterly along the South line of Marvin's Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 80-98 20 feet; thence northerly along the West line of Mary i n' s Reorganization 1372,95 feet; thence westerly 20.0 feet; thence northerly along the East line of Stockton Street also teing t-= East line of the King Video Cable Reorganization as c=scrited City of Lodi Resolution No. 3814, 837,4 feet to the =int cf Beginning and containing 57.6 acres more or less. LEGAL rUUM NOTICE OF NIENTION TO INITIATE ANNEXATION/REORGANIZATION PRUCEEDP4GS BY THE CITY CDLNM OF THE CITY OF LORI FOR 14114, 14668 and 14758 NORTH STOCKTON STREET and 3820, 3861, 3886, 3891, 3910, 3933 and 3936 EAST ALMOND DRIVE NUIICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, the 4th day of December 1991, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Carnegie Forum, 305 west Pine Street, the City Council of the City of Lodi intends to initiate Annexation/Reorganization proceedings for 14114 North Stockton Street (APN 062-290-01) ; 14668 North Stockton Street (APN 062-060-04); arid 14755 North Stockton Street (APN 062-060-12); and 3820 East Almond Drive (APN 062-060-30); 3861 East Almond Drive (APN 062-060-13); 3886 East Almond Drive (APN 062-060-31); 3891 East Almond Drive (APN 062-060-15); 3910 East Almond Drive (APN 062-060-32); 3933 East Almond Drive (APN 062-060-14); and 3936 East Almond Drive (APN 062-060-33). Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, or by phoning (209) 333-6711. All interested persons are invited to present their views either for or against the above proposal. Written statements may be filed with the Community Development Director at any time prior to the Hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said Hearing, If you challenge the Annexation/Reorganization in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community Development Director at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. 12611-41, 7A * 01-,-dc-- ALICE M. RENIC ffi City Clerk Dated: November 11, 1991 Approved as to form: Bobby W. McNatt City Attorney SAUMBACH & PIAZZA, Etic. � io Phone (209, 743VE7M8=-R 26. 10 Z'- jo=- NO. 01`Y6 JOB NO. 90155 J09 N.0. G )COY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FUR NEUHARTH NORTH ANNEXATION of the West half of the East half of Section 13. North. Rar.ge 6 East, Mour-t Diaolo Base and Meridian portions os Lots 14 and 15 of A. J.. Larsons isigr. of the Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 3, p.anae 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian as filed in ,�="ume = of Maps and Plats, page 4 San Joaquin County Records :)tinz :pre particularly described as follows: 3 at the point of intersection o= the South line of the '._-t`� seven acres of said Lot 15 and the East line of Stockton ct-eet (40 feet wide); thence easterly 661.55 feet alono the ,:i -r. ±:nes of the 6uthmii ler Reorganization, the Geweke =e-n-ga^ization, and the Geweke East Reorganization as described City of.Lodi Resolutions 3795, 3928 and 3978 respectively to ine East line of said Lot 15; thence southerly along the Wiest ::tee c— the Geweke Addition No. 3 Reorganization as described in tv os Lodi Resolution No. 4332, 434.36 feet to the Southwest cc-ne- thereof being the Southeast corner of said Lot 15thence co^tin;e southerly along the West line of the Noma ==orcanization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 81- S --:-C.45 feet to the Southwest corner thereof: thence easterly s:zn7 the South line of the Noma Reoroanization'33 feet more or leis tc the Northwest corner of the sandy Ranch P.eoroanization a= des:-ibed in City of Lodi Resolution No. 80-36; thence south= -ply along the West line of said Tandy Ranch Reorganization -Feet more or less to the South line of the Northeast c..a-ter of said Section 13; thence easterly along the South line c= sa_= Northeast quarter, 302.96 feet; thence along the West .ire c- the Johnson Ranch Reorganization as described in City of -cc_ 7,e=olution 79-138, southerly 1088.75 feet to the Southeast :=-ne-- _f the Bangs property as described in San Joaquin County ?nstrument No. 91064368; thence westerly 995 feet along_ :ine of the Bangs property to the East line of c.oc:to- Street; thence northerly along the East line of Street being the East line of the Salas Park "ezrca-:Zatlon as described in City of Lodi Resolution 40e4, .Sc -Feet to the South line of the Northeast quarter of said =e= ---c- 13: thence easterly along the South line of Marvin's _ration as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. G(J-ca :hence northerly along the 'pies' line of 1772.95 feet; ..aence westerly fee., a-cnq the East line of. Stocvt cn otree:. al__ Wit'_. cz int �.�nv Viaeo _.ao:e fl�Or^yaC _tii`ion Ls __ _ _ -OC.. R�3.?tL:..Qn r`io _vt�'+. �'�.. • nPt to FRC.' _.."�`_ _ _'1^ iSt'7^ CQntuSn�nC 57 acre?: -mora' .. less. ,yfUflR�rN ,4��--rx /IDD/r/ON _!-!_i_ ► J — rq i:odi Cjt;l liinIt � 90" � ft AV. CIE / -- __/,Y, SEE �l � � r ►.�J ' ar, r All �U 1 � ` �" ri A.v.nwo0 Hy. 1,5 A� ! rIncA Aum q All r� �'., �►V ti , O t 80.rror �. x T3 SCALF: /"=400 v; �zt �/�0196 �•� UAY I i CITY COUNCIL JAMES W_ PINKERiON, Mayor PHILLIPA PENNINO Mayor Pro Tempore DAVID M. HINCHMAN JACK A SIEGLOCK JOHN R (Randy) SNIDER CITY OF LODI MY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET PO. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 952414910 (209) 334-5634 FAX (209) 333- in5 December 6, 1991 Mr. Gerald Scott Executive Officer Local Agency Formation Commission 1810 East Hazelton Street Stockton, CA 95205 Dear Mr. Scott: THOMAS A. PETERSON City Manager ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk BOB McNATT City Attorney Enclosed herewith please find 4 certified copies of Resolution No. 91-223 - "A Resolution of the Lodi City Council for the Application to the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission in the Matter of the 'Neuharth North Addition' Including the Detachment of Certain Territory Within the Area Proposed for Annexation to the City of Lodi". Also enclosed please find the following documents pertaining to this matter: a) Three (3) copies of Justification of Proposal. b) Fifteen (15) copies of legal meets and bounds description of affected territory consistent with standards acceptable to the County Surveyor's office. C) Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory. d) Filing and processing fees in accordance with LACCO fee schedule ($1,325.00). Should you need additional information or have any questions regarding this matter, please don't hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Alice M. Reimche City Clerk AMR/jmp Enclosures ANNEX.05/TXTA.02J/ANNEX JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL -FOR REORGANIZATION OR MANGE OF ORGANIZATION AFFECTING LOCAL AGENCIES ed with: AL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Gerald F. Scott, Executive Officer 0 E. Hazelton ckton, CA 95205 ne: (209) 468-3198 Date: December 2, 1991 . undersigned, on behalf of the proponents of the subject proposal, hereby 'e notice of intention to: incorporate a city disincorporate a city form a district dissolve a district A_ annex territory to an agency ice— detach territory from an agency consolidzte existing agencies further deliberations by the Commission, we submit the following: � 1. Three (3) copies of this completed "Justification of Proposal". 2. Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds description of affected territory consistent with s-.andards acceptable to the County Surveyor's Office. 3. Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory and affected agencies (maps to be no smaller than 811'x 11" which is the most preferable size and shall be no larger than 18" x 26". 4. Filing 2nd processing fees in accordance with LAFCO fee schedule - following persons (not to exceed three) are to be mailed copies of the >cutive Officer's Report and Notice of Commission hearings regarding the J ect proposal_ Richard Neuharth 3861 E. Alinond Drive, Lodi , CA 95240 (209) 369-6709 Alice M. Reimche P.O. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (209) 333-6102 James B.- Schroeder P.O. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (209) 333-6711 dress) (Signed) ?LETE ALL QU.STIONNAIRE ITEMS a question is not applicable to your proposal, you may so state. Local Agency organization cnanges hereby proposed --designate affected agencies and annexations by name: NEUHARTH NORTH ADDITION Withdrawal from the Woodbridge Rural Coutny Fire District and the Northern San Joaquin Water Conservation District. Statutory provisions gover: ins proceediays : Local Government Reorganization act 1985 2. Do orbooszd boundaries create an is and or corridor of unincorporated `er-_tory? No. 4. Lo proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ownership? No. 5. Land area affected: Square miles na A c r e s 5� 6 6. population in subject area: 2n Number of registered voters: 18 7. Registered voter density (per acre)=_,Q-a— Number of dwelling units: 9— 8. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years: 936 9. Present land use of subject area: Agricultural and residential. 10. What is the intended development of this area: Low Density Residential. r 11. Present zoning: GA -40, General Agriculture. 12. Describe proposed zoning changes: Prezone to R-2, Residential, Single -Family and P D , P 1 anned Development. 13. Assessed value of land: $1.111,097 14. Assessed value of improvements$ 161,746 15. Value of publicly owned land in area: $, -0- 16. Governmental services required. by this proposal which are not presently available: City services including water, sewer, storm drainage, police and fire protection. 17. What alternative measures would provide services listed in Item 16 above? County sheriff and Woodbridge Rural Fire District. Private water and sewer. 18. What modifications must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to provide services initiated by this proposal? Extend existing streets, water, sewer and storm drain lines into the project area. 19. What approximate costs will be incurred In accomplishing requirements of I t e in 18 above? No cost estimate. 20. How w i i i such costs be met? Developer will pay for construction costs. There will also be development fees to pay for major facility costs. 21. W i 1 1 provisions of this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency or affected property? No. 22. ID Check here if you are submitting further comments and evaluations on additional pages. Imoortant Notice Regarding Disclosure of Camnaicxn Contributions Made tc L.AFCn Commissioners on Paae 3. (Rev. 4- 85) CIN COUNCIL JAMES W. MNPMMN, Mayor PHILLIP'A. PENNINO Mayor Pro Tempore DMD M. HINCHMAN )ACK A SiEGLOCK IOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER December 5, 1991 CITY OF LODX CITY i iALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET FQ BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209) 334-5634 FAX (209) 333-6745 Mr. Gerald Scott, Executive Director LAFCO of San Joaquin County 1810 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 THOMAS A. PETE FSM City Manager ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk BOB McNATT City Attomey SUBJECT: Neuharth NxIt1 Addition - City Service Plan and Prime Agricultural Conversion Statement CITY SERVICE PLAN Enumeration of Services The City of Lodi provides sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage and electric power, as well as police and fire protection to al I parcels within the City limits. Natural gas is provided by P.G. & E., and Pacific Bell provides local telephone service. Level and Rangg of Service The City of Lodi will provide the full level and range of required urban services. There are existing sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage lines located in Stockton St. (21" SS, 12" W, 34" SD), and in Almond Dr. (24" SS, 10"W,42" SD). There is an existing drainage basin/park (Salas Park) Located at the south-west comer of Century Blvd. and Stockton St. that provides storm drainage retention capacity and recreation facilities for the area. Electricity, natural gas and telephone service are available to the property. Availability of Service All City and public utility company services are available to the property subject to the developer making the necessary l i ne extensions. IMprovements Require When the property is developed, the developer will be required to make any necessary utility extension:;. This will include the following: MI 1. Sanitary sewer - minor extensions to serve the project streets. 2. Water - extend the existing 10" water main from Chickadee Ln. to Stockton St. in the Century Blvd. right of way. Minor line extensions to serve project streets. 3. Storm Drainage - Minor line extensions to serve project streets. 4. Streets - full street improvements on Almond Dr., Stockton St. and Century Blvd. including curbs, gutter, sidewalks and pavement widening. Century Blvd. will be extended between Stockton St. and Chickadee Ln. Method of Financing All required service extensions and other improvements will be done by the developers at their expense. The City may participate in some of the cost if oversized lines are required or improvements are made that benefit surrounding properties. The developer will also be required to pay Development Impact Mitigation Fees to finance capital improvements of new and existing City services. Statement on the Conversion of Prime Agricultural Land Development of the Neuharth lei property will result in the conversion of 57.60 acres of prime agricultural land. Unfortunately, in Lodi the conversion of prime agricultural land is unavoidable. All the land in and around the City of Lodi is prime agricultural land; consequently, it is not possible to direct development toward non -prime agricultural land. The Neuharth lei property is a reasonable extension of the existing City limits. The property abuts the existing City limits on the north, east, and west. The property fronts on two major streets, Almond Drive and Stockton Street, and can be easily served by City utilities. The property is within the General Plan boundaries of the City and the City's utility system has been designed to serve the ect area. Junior Planner 2 Notir-e of ®eterminatio— To : Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth S trees. Rom 12I Sacramento. CA 95814 X county clerk County of San Joaaui n Appendix H From: (Public Agency) City of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95241-1910 M Subject: Fling ofNotice of3etermination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the PublicResources Code. NEUHARTH NORTH ADDITION Project Title r -- Mark Meissner (2091 333-6711 State Clearinghouse Nmter Lead Agmcy Arm Codc/TelephonelExtension (if svbmined to Clearinghouse) Contact Person Northeast corner of Almond Dr. & Stockton St., Lodi, San Joaquin County Project Location (include county) Project Description: Amex 15.4 acres of land to the City of Lodi. Prezone land R-2, Single -Family Residential to permit low density residential development. This is to advise that the City of Lodi has approved the above described project on M L=d Agency O Responsible Agemy Dec. 4, 1991 and has made the following detenninations regarding the above descrilxd project (D—) 1. The project [0wiU ®will not] have a significanteffect on the environment 2. Q An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ® A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of (IEQA 3. Mitigation measures ['}were Qwere not] made a condition of the approval of the pmjeet. 4. A statement of0verriding Considerations [[]was [jwas nal adopted for this project 5. Findings [[)were (y�were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final FIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at. Dec. 6, 1991 Date Date received for filing at OPR: Jr. Planner Title Revised October 1989 r~_ N Z:=_- I1I.QARA.t_ICN1 Notice is hereby given that the City of todi Planning Department has determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail- able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Hall Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal". Date Sept. 16, 1991 Project Title: NEUHARTH NORTH. ADDMON, PREZONE, ANNDCARN AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: Eric W. Veerkamp r NAME OF PERSON; FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT: Minoru Morimoto and Richard Neuharth Address: City: County: 3861 E. Ahnond U Lodi San Joaquin Area Code: Phone; (209) 369-6709 PROJECT DESGUMON OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION Three parcels of land, APN's 062-060-04, 12 and 13 totaling 15.4 acres are to be annexed to the City. The property, located on the East side of Stockton Street between Ahnond Dr. and Kettleman Lane, will be used for residential purposes as per the R-2 and low density residential designations. Project Location City Project Location un y LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Last Rate to Appeal: Address Whcfe Freliminary Environinent Assessment is Availab?e: October 7, 1991 IS.E1 MY PLANNING DEPT. 221 W. 'Pine St. , Lodi, CA . 95240 Phone: (209) 334-5634 Cag of god[ E:4VIROng�E'.�iTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY I• PROJECT TITLE NEUHARTH NORTH ADDITION ANNEXATION, PREZONE & GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2. LOCATION -_... Lane 3• N' PROJECT DESCRIPTION �jp. i062-04, 1 rpp Darcp�t &013 __and_tntalino 15.4 Lores will be annexed to the City, A General Plan designation of Law Density Residential and a prp. 7nni ng to R-2, Single -Family Residential have been requested with the intent of constructing single-family homes on the site. 4. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) Planned Residenti PR; (B) Low Densis Residential, LDR. S• Site description and surrounding land use The site is currently used for agricultural �ijrpnsps with two homes --It-is borderpd on the Nor h and West by corrsT�--rc i a I and 1 i gh t 1 nnlust ri al (1 umber co=an, Z, RV sales, cable TV Co. 6. Zoning (A) Existing, (8) Proposed (A) GA, Aqriculture; (8) R-2, Single- --Family Residential. _ Will the Project Have a Significant Effect Through Any of the Following impacts? VpC 1 tlayb 7. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, so!I or subsoil fisab ....... ............................ 'yr— b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater:. qua) i ty... _ X C Substantially deplete surface or groundwater resources ............................................. X d. Substantially interfere' with groundwater flo w orrecharge ........................................... X e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion or siltation .......................................... X f. Substantial interference with the habitat of any _.._. species of fish, wildTife or plant .................... y g. Violate ambient air quality standards or create substantial air emissions or objectionable odors. ...... y h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare level for adjoining an ............................ y- i.- Substantial reduction of existing cropland.. .......... X j. Expose individuals or property to geologic. public health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards.. .... X k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic effect ............................................... 1. Result in the disruption or alteration of an archeological, historical or paleontological site.. .. M. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in any natural mmmm ....... :.- ................ n.- Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of fuel or_energy....................................... o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm drain, electrical,lines or public roads. ............. p. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of public services such as schools or fire or police protection ........................................... q. Substantially change transportation patterns related to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking availability or traffic safety. . ..................... r. Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace- ment of population ................................... s. Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or planned land = ............................... t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of the City of Lodi .................................... Yes No Maybe V X X X X X X X X X Adverse impacts of project and increase dmod City their magnitude: Annexation of the properties fire, would drain, on electrical service and services such as schools. I t will police, sewer, also impact traffic water. storm capacity and parking and mai reduce existing cropland. Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse impacts identified by Initial Study: See attachment. RECOMMENDATION X Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Uegative Declaration JAMES B. SCHROEDEFY Env��iZrn �i iew fficer —Ure Sept. 16, 1991 EIR!1-81 NEUHARTH NORTH ADDITION PREZONE AND ANNEXATION Environmental Assessment - Initial Study Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: i_ This project may convert some prime agricultural land to urban, uses. Lodi's General Plan has identified the conversion of prime agricultural land as an adverse impact on development. The only mitigation measure available is prohibiting development of agricultural lands. Since this would lead to a halt to all new development, it is seen as an unavoidable impact. However, policies in the Conservation Element of the General Plan are aimed at delaying the loss of prime lands and facilitating continued agricultural uses. Some of these policies include adopting a "right -to -farm" ordinance for adjacent landowner;, establishing buffer zones between urban uses and agricultural uses, and designating an open space greenbelt around the urbanized area of the City. o. The City will periodically update public works capital improvements needs assessment studies to ensure that new facilities will be provided to meet the increased dcmand on water, sewer, storm drain and electrical services. The City snall assess fees on all new development to cover the costs of such new services. Due to the fact that the additional service extensions will be developed in accordance with the City's master plan, the impacts are deemed to be less than significant. p, Additional public services such as police, fire, and schools will be needed to meet the increased demand. The City will assess fees on all new development to fund the required additional police and fire services. Adding personnel, equipment and facilities to maintain targeted response times and other service levels reduces the impact on fire and police protection to less than significant. In order to reduce the impact on school overcrowding to less than significant, the Lodi Unified School District should revise their facilities needs assessment to be consistent with General Plan growth projections. Fees asse:;sed on new development along with money from other sources will privide the necessp-y funding. q. The City will periodically update public works capital improvements needs assessment studies to ensure that new facilities will be provided as per the General Plan Circulation Element. Fees imposed on new development along with money from State and Federal sources will pay for needed new traffic infrastructure to meet the increased demand. r. The City's General Plan 1s based on a two percent (20) annual growth rate. Development will be regulated so as not to exceed two percent in any given year. b -ause growth will be consistently maintained and not exceed the City's projections; the impact is reduceJ to less than significant. N f LIV R P rN N 0 IV 0 J ----VI D D I t / 0 N T 047 1"q /V I Z /7 r1 ON j.1 0.8 66!.55'" Jili r gin AV. I f I I I Qc 'Its 441,-L� n#t. cL v t ZC Finch ftxj 4c Dr. IN n u u 4z 1497 91 13 CEWURY Z ova: sit 12-2-91 Notice of Determinatigp 19 TO: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95314 X County Clerk County of San Joaquin Appendix H From: (Public Agency)_Ci4 of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 di 1 CA 95241-1910 Subject: Filing of Notica of Determination In compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. BANGS-COLVIN ADDITION (Now a portion of Neuharth North Addition) Project Title r -- Mark Meissner (209) 333-6711 State Clearinghouse Number Lead Agcy Area CodetTelephone/Extension (If submitted to CEarasghouse) contact. Person -Southeast corner of Almond Drive & Stockton Street, Lodi, San Joaquin County Project Location (include county) Project DeWdptlon: Annex to the City of Lodi 37.92 acres and prezone to R-2, Residential, Single -Family to permit low density residential development. This is to advise that the City of l odi has approved the above described project on Lead Agcwy 0 Responsible Agency Dec. 4, 1991 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: (Dm) 1. The project [C]will MwiLl nor] have a significant effect on the environment 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ® A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures (were []were not) made a condition of the approval of the project 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations (was (_X]was not] adopted for this project 5. Findings (Qwere Owere rot] made pursuant tD the provisions of CEQA. This is to cyrtify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the General Public at: Dec. 6, 1991 Jr. Planner Atrencty) / Dare Date received for filing at OPR: Title Revised October 1989 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department has determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail- able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Hall Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal". Date August 9, 1991 Project Title: BANGS & COLYIN ADDITION AND PREZONING Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: M a r k e r NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY LNDERIAK G PROJECT: J. Jeffrey Kirst Address : City: County: 120 N. Pleasant Avenue Lodi an jaantrin Area Code: Phone; (209) 334-0670 PROJECT DESGUnM OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND IA0Ck N Annexation to the City of Lodi and prezoning of 37.92 acres of existinq vine -yard, includinq four sinqle family residences. The land will be used for residential purposes as designated in the Lodi General Plan. The properties to be annexed are .Aecated at 3820. 3886, 3910, and 3936 E. Almond. Drive and 14114 N. Stockton Street. Project Location City Project Location County LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Last Date to Appeal: Address Where Preliminary Environment Assessment is Available: Oct. 7, 1991 LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT. 221 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240 Phone: (209) 334-5634 r Ciig COMMUNITY AA DERAR od nodi ENViRON\NIEWAL DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT TMENT INITIAL. STUDY 1. PROJECT TITLE BANGS AND COLVIN ADDITION AND PREZONING 2. LOCATION 3820, 3386, 3920 and 3936 E- Almond Dr. and 14114 N. Stockton St. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION APN's 062-290-01 and 062-060-30, 31, 32 and 33. Annex to the City of Lodi 5 parcels of land totaling 37.92 acres, prezone the properties to PD, Planned Development and R-2, Single Family Residential. (See attached) 4. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) PR, Planned Residential ; (B) LDR, low Density Residential. 5. Site description and surrounding land use The area to be annexed consists of vineyards with four single family homes. There are vineyards to the north and south, industrial uses and a park/drainage basin to the west single family 6. [oning a eas ee c e (A) GA -40 San Joaquin {$) PD g �A3 xis ung, 8) ropose ( quin County); , Planned Development and R-2, Single Family�Residential.- Will the Project Have a Significant Effect 'through Any of the Following Impacts? Y.66- 140---Ma4tba� 7. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil X orsubsoil �..................... .............. _ ... h Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.. C. Substantially deplete surface or groundwater _-.___ resources .................. __.... _ _._ _.- - X CL Substantially interfere with groundwater flow orrecharge.. ................................ . .................. - .. X ... _ e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion orsiltation .......................................... X f. .......... Substantial interference with the habitat of any species of fish, wildlife or plant .................... X g. Violate ambient air quality standards -or create substantial air emissions or objectionable odors...... X h. Substantially increase ambient i.oise or glare. level for adjoining areas ........................••••• X i. Substantial reduction of existing cropland.. •••••••••• X J. Expose individuals or property to geologic,. public health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards.. .... X 7 Yes No Maybe k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic effect............................................... X — l. Result in the disruption or alteration of an archeological, historical or paieontological site.... _ X M. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in any natural nmum ............................... ,i. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of fuel or energy.,.. ................................... X o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm drain, electrical lines or public roads .............. X p. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of public services such as schools of fire or police X protection ........................................... — q. Substantially change transportation patterns related to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking availability or traffic safety ....................... X r. induce substantial growth, concentration or displace- ment of population ................................... X s. Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or planned land uses ................................... X t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of the City of Lodi.. .................................. — X Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: 7-0, 7-p, 7-q: See attached ' Adverse impacts. Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by Initial Study: See attached. RECOMMENDATION X Negative Declaration EIR/1-81 EIR Conditional Negative Deelaration JAMES B. SCHROEDER Environmen al Revie Officer gy Date_.tj_�,-pr BANGS AND COLVIN ADDITION AND PREZONING Project Description APIs 062-290-01 and 062-060-30, 31, 32, and 33. At the request of the property owners of the parcels listed above, the City of Lodi is proposing to annex 5 contiguous parcels of land totaling 37.92 acres. The City will also be prezoning parcel 062-290-01 as PD, Planned Development and R-2, single family residential. Parcels 062-060-30, 31, 32, and 33 will be prezoned as R-2.only. These .twozoning designations provide for limited multi -family residential uses and are consistent with the City's adopted General' Plan' and its existing land use designations. ---- --. Site Description and Surrounding Land Uses The five properties are located near the south-east corner of the City, bordered by South Stockton Street to the west and Almond Drive to the - north. The area to be annexed consists primarfly of vineyards with four single family homes. The surrounding land uses are vineyards to the north, vineyards to the south, industrial uses and a park/drainage '- basin to the west, and single family residences to the east. {see Map) Parcel 062-060-30 has 11.81 acres of vineyards and has one single family home fronting on Stockton Street. Parcels 062-060-31, 32, and 33 are each a half an acre and have one single family home apiece, all fronting on Almond Drive. Parcel 062-290-01 has 24.61 acres of vineyards. - Adverse Impacts of the Project neRafflon ana su sequen evelopment of the two properties -would - necessitate major improvements to water, sewer, storm drain, electrical lines and public roads. The annexation would change transportation patterns related to existing traffic loads and street capacity. The future development of homes in the area to be annexed would also increase the demand for or utilization of public services such as schools. Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts In order to mitigate the impacts from trattic related problems resulting from new development of this annexaticn and future annexations, the City of Lodi has adopted a general plan policy and implementation program that addresses this issue. Policy: "The City shall review new developments for consistency with the GP Circulation Element and the capital improvements program. Those developments found to be consistent with the Circulation Element shall be required to pay their fair share of traffic impact fees and/or charges. Those developments found to be generating more traffic than that assumed in the Circulation Element shall be required to prepare a site-specific traffic study and fund needed improvements not' -identified in the capital improvements program, in addition to paying their fair share of the traffic impact fee and/or charges." The traffic impact fee wi11 be used to finance future improvements, such as traffic signals and street widening projects for older intersections and streets recently congested by new development. In order to mitigate the financial impacts of the provision and installation of public uti1ities necessary for new development of this annexation and future annexations at? on-site improvements such as streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, sewer lines, water fines, storm drainage lines and electrical lines are currently, and will continue to be, provided by the subdivider/developer prior to construction. At present all major utilities have sufficient capacity to serve the project area with all required services. A residential project will produce additional school—age children. These students would attend ttie LUSD which is currently impacted due to overcrowding. In order to mitigate the problem of school overcrowding the applicant will be required to pay any school impaction fees that nW be in effect at the time of approval. Payment of the fees Will reduce this impact to a less than significant level. co 0 '-J0 = < . D o 3 '7 (5 E3 Z (D C: I y� Q .14 1 J."4T ol 07 fR� 18 " m SNOIIVXANNd 1N3Wl8dd3(l 031S3nc)3a 1N3WdOl3A30 A11Ni1WWOO 06. rJi — 1 l cm C3 G C��C]DCDC�C BAUMBACH & PIAZZA, mc. C. ri 323 West E:rr. Street Lodi, California 95240 Phone(209)368-6618 REVISED DECEMBER 2, 1991 NOVEMBER 26, 1991 JOB NO. 9196 JOB NO. 90155 JOB NO. 9003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FDR NEUHARTH NORTH ANNEXATION A portion of the West half of the East half of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian including portions of Lots 14 and 15 of A. J. Larsuns Subdivision of the Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian as filed in Volume 2 of Maps and Flats, page 4 San Joaquin County Records being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the South line of the North seven acres of said Lot 15 and the East line of Stockton Street (40 feet wide); thence easterly 661.55 feet along the South lines of the Guthmiller Reorganization, the Geweke Reorganization, and the Geweke East Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolutions 3795, 3920 and f978 respectively to the East line of said tat 15; thence southerly along the West line of the Geweke Addition No. 3 Heorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 4332, 434.36 feet to the Southwest corner thereof being the Southeast corner of said Lot 15; thence continue southerly along the West line of the Noma Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 131- 68, 863.45 feet to the Southwest corner thereof; thence easterly along the South line of the Noma Reorganization 33 feet more or less to the Northwest corner of the Tandy Ranch Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 80-36; thence southerly along the West line of said Tandy Ranch Reorganization 909.10 feet more or less to the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 13; thence easterly along the South line of said Northeast quarter, 302.96 feet; thence along the West line of the Johnson Ranch Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution 79-138, southerly 1088.75 feet to the Southeast corner 'of the gangs property as described in San Joaquin County Records, Instrument No. 91064366; thence westerly 995 feet along the South line of the Bangs property to the East line of Stockton Street; thence northerly along the East line of Stockton Street being the East line of the Salas Park Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution 4084, 1085 feet to the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 13; thence easterly along the South line of Marvin's Reorganization as described in City of Lodi Resolution No. 80-98 20 feet; thence northerly along the West line of Margin's Reorganization 1372.95 feet; thence westerly 20.0 feet: thence northerly along, the East line of Stockton Street also teing t== East line of the King Uideo Cable Reorganization as �escribed Cit,/ of Lodi Resolution No. '3814. B3:..4 feet to the .int cr Beginning and containing 57.6 acres more or less. L--- NFUIIARI'X NOQ� AD10ltlONL�` �s rR RE o u OAN 'R IOV aL Al RV Ale r A.0.8 i gQ• (: vdi Ci 1�y l imp is 1 66t.55" ..l 6POLD w K7 tl iy Av, � � M "tin r. o m l It • a \ a .. e i • y .• �. 4 n.enwo� Mp. or OR v e inch Ilan ry O Pauhart ~ 4+eerer IJ,• Q . /Q 44Cq 5 I / 0 V► � � 701 P 7 t t � �9g6 --� i ! F If _.. . _ 12-1 --91 X— ..... -- ...... ..._ R. THOMAS DEVELOPMENT.' ':. FARMERS a ME9°"+ANTS BANK 5 700 CH 1209 W. TOKAY, NO. 8 MAIN [ P. O. BOX 1598 PH. 209-334-5521 LODI. CALIrORN1A I IMI. CA 85241-1598 90-844.1211 ...In.r •.n. r.tll: :r 4.. ,p, 12/06/91 005700 *******$336.55 TffiEE HUNDRED THIRTY-SIX AND 55/100 DOLLARS 1.1 rl,c LAFCO nr(nrF: fit R. THOMAS DEVELOPMENT. INC. P. O- BOX 1598, LODI. CA 95241.1598 t rtt+ +F! If, +00094 LAFCO +11 Al lk ✓.J r!AI! I:IIrm r•n I �'i" �,, :ISI t•I f'•'�� lie'') 12/06/91 COLVIN� 336.55 .00 R. THOMAS DEVELOPMENT, INC. VFNITOFI NAME Nr 1' AAti It IN 336.55 57W ................. ff_ - (fi'.KI!A;L t',HLCKNU rt)V.I +•+u+:S Fn 4)I I+R-`+U(:IIONW Y WCFII:CKAMOUNI- 12/06/91 005700 336.55 .00 336.55 li RRQQ (r,CCRS (! HH FARMERS & MERCHANT'^'9ANK 106 A CALiN.�7V'�RFR IP OF CENTRAL CALIF( a F. 4. BOX 7596 Pk. 209 -333 -SOCK LODI OFFICE L LODI. CA 95241 ODI, CA 95240 90-844-1211 "All CI IT CY NO Cl IF CY Aklf)l Yil "***Six Hundred Twenty Two and 75/100****** 12/9/91 106 **$622.75** TO TFIF ORDER LAFCO OF BANGS RANCH VFNr)()ri NC) VENDOR NAME 10.6 -- ---- - -- - .... _ ................... . . . . .... W I• IFrrN Nfl ANA)UNI 1!!J.Id':k(.IF1Nt)AiC fiF'.FCF'F,N(�1 tail Y,;••!•..S IPJT •• ` 12/9/91 Anneration Request Fee $622.75 I HFCY• L�A7F. CIIECK NO 101M (MOY; ; IINAI. )[DUCTION CHECK AMOUNT TODD ROGER FUJtNAGA 1620 FUJINAGA AND OSHIKA ATTORNEYS AT LAW CLIENT TRUST ACCOUNT 2010 NORTH STREET 408-280-5700 �y 11-49/1210 { SAN JOSE, CA 95131 PAY ORDER OF_ —z—AC- Co— DOLLARS c� W"w ornu Ne ►w. **11.: neo. cdUow+e aeas ....K FOR G.+e C O l..tIL Z __ TODD ROGER FUJINAGA�___. FUJINAGA AND OSHIKA --- ATTORNEYS AT LAW CLIENT TRUST ACCOUNT 2010 NORTH STREET 408-280-5700 11-49!1210 SAN JOSE, CA 95131 �A t PAY TO THE ORDER OF I $ �y.. s•-� r � �C^%D_fAd`C►_�.�LL —/g ruCO _ . _.DOLLARS wnnanc� wwrr.r..e cow—ft o"" FOR - r