HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 16, 1991 (58)r
i
OR
C Q F LQ� COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
c�4
AGENDA TITLE: Renewal of Workers Compensation Claim Administration
contract with Greenfield -Thompson Associates
MEETING DATE: October 16, 1991
PREPARED EY: Assistant City Manager
RECOiIENDED:ACTION That Council approve the renewal of the contract with
Greenfield Thompson Associates which includes an 8% fee
increase.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Greenfield -Thompson Associates (GTA) began service as the
City's Workers Ccmpensation third party administrator in
November, 1990. The process of transfering files and
electronic data as well as getting new procedures on
line has not been'`easy. : However, an excellent communication flow and working
relationship. has developed between GTA and the City.
In "January,,`1991,:workers compensation "reforms" were introduced in California.
These "reforms" have,. served. primarily to add more deadlines and bureaucratic hoops
to.an..'already complex ...and: expensive system. The primary beneficiaries of this
system have beenphysicians and attorneys.
The current pricing for claims administration services expires on November 1, 1991.
In response .to the added complexities and increased claims activity created by the
1989<Re.form Act.landi AB '.2910., GTA is requesting a 6% increase in its service fee.
GTA is'also askingfor a'•2% increase to cover operating expenses and cost of living
for., employees.° This overall 8% increase will raise GTA's monthly fee from $4,400
per month"to,14,750.' The Service Fee agreement is attached for Council's review.
FUNDING: Sufficient monies have been budgeted in the Workers Comensation Insurance
Fund to cover the cost of this contract.
Respectfully Submitted,
rerry Glenn
Assistant City Manager
JLG-.KJE: tp
Attachment
Prepared by Kirk J. Evans
Administrative Assistant to the Ci
APPROVED:
THOMAS A. PETERSON ...d.......
r.�'�:bi'w.ati�nm.>.µw�.. �as� .x �wv ...•.,.nru�+r`cz-uMw.�:rn,�.0 .��*�,�a_ :a: .... _ _.. ..,.._. _.� .._ .....___�
Gltt'E:\PIFI.l�'Cllull!'��i�\.rt�ta�'CF,� _..
September 12, 1991
,4
SEF 1
Y91
C'dY ManaSe{s0�ce
r
Mr. Jerry L. Glenn
Assistant City Manager
The City of Lodi
221 West Pine Street
P. O_ Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
Re: Renewal of Workers' Compensation Claim
Administration Contract - 1991
Dear Jerry:
The current pricing for claims administration services
R?i]26igticglnlye-ind lis 4L?Rject too'�Ean;r$yi�ludj��
requests for fee increases, approved by both parties.
we a .3er
Nyb e requesting an 13.6$x. overall increase- or% $600 PAP
comp; due the additional seryjjaesABr-Euired of GTA im
v 1tJhan ry27 3�, �g ��narw itch 1;became
.' ndew ity- claims.
While we still do not know the full impact of the 1989
Reform Act and AB -2910, the clean-up legislation, we are
experiencing increases in our costs of doing business as
examiner and support staff must be added to prepare,
document and present information on reporting, penalties
and audit procedures as well as a host of new procedures
and activities the examiner must perform and document on
each claim file in preparation for the Office of Benefit
Enforcement audits.
^A1:=vrevi.ew of:;>:the^: Anrn
show,s^`the .open rinde Reports:~, -•and=, computers -information
i.�ro `2Z5 to' 1421", whit claims, count has r increased ] 3.6%w
allows,, tne. 21 i 5t'increase:Y-,irn°,` new
"rePOrt There is a direct percentage
relationship between the number of open indemnity files
and our fee increase request.
s«i<< 110
P.C). wix sss,
Plersanbm, CA 94566-0188
45 426 9263
After- `;you; _`havend aria opportunity tow review-
nfrirmationpresented;glease6give,me a_,call� toy discuss j
Tlou� sucigeste -, nervii'ceswjfees�fot�Wtheo i,.99X contrac -period-,i
If there; .is any additional' information, legislative or
computer data we can :provide which will help in your
review and approval of this.`increase, please let me know. {
If in order, please return one signed copy of the amended,
service fee section of our agreement, as attached.
We have enjoyed working the other cit with you .and h Y
employees and Took forward to a long' and mutually
beneficial business relationship. !
Very t my you , {
Deborah S. a nfiel
GREENFIELD-THOMPSO SSOCIATES, INC.
DSG/kk
Ch October 2, 1991, Deborah Greenfield was contacted by the
City. She was informed that, given recent modifications to
the City's loss run (many cases have been closed), the pro-
jection of a 6.5% increase in open claims was excessive.
She agreed to drop GTA's service fee request by $250.00,
resulting in a net overall increase of only $350.00 or 8%.
'.
+�y§:.'�.-�•" ��"�"."`
.» sv' �`k'3%�%`yr .. ,_. .�-
...cai:k x,(X�.+t1'Rf9aa�fx!�,''.`�-',r;.et-c�:il4x�ryr, +><:��.:w.o...r...._.—
...... ...-_.a..,��..u.mv.^ c. ..:a»' .r.-.�< 1, �'.�,�AK
Page Two
I
{
r
The requested
service fee increase is outlined as
follows:
$4400.00
current Mgnthly
E
fee
242.00
5.5%,increases in claim activities
from I— _
)89 Reform Act & );
After- `;you; _`havend aria opportunity tow review-
nfrirmationpresented;glease6give,me a_,call� toy discuss j
Tlou� sucigeste -, nervii'ceswjfees�fot�Wtheo i,.99X contrac -period-,i
If there; .is any additional' information, legislative or
computer data we can :provide which will help in your
review and approval of this.`increase, please let me know. {
If in order, please return one signed copy of the amended,
service fee section of our agreement, as attached.
We have enjoyed working the other cit with you .and h Y
employees and Took forward to a long' and mutually
beneficial business relationship. !
Very t my you , {
Deborah S. a nfiel
GREENFIELD-THOMPSO SSOCIATES, INC.
DSG/kk
Ch October 2, 1991, Deborah Greenfield was contacted by the
City. She was informed that, given recent modifications to
the City's loss run (many cases have been closed), the pro-
jection of a 6.5% increase in open claims was excessive.
She agreed to drop GTA's service fee request by $250.00,
resulting in a net overall increase of only $350.00 or 8%.
The fees paid by Employer to Service Company under this
agreement are Cor services rendered by Service Company
during the twelve month period beginning November 1, 1-991•
The Service Company assumes no obligation or responsibility
for services beyond an earlier termination date.
CLAIM ADMINISTRATION: A guaranteed flat fee payable in
equal monthly installments of $4,750.- due in advance the
first of each month beginning November 1991 to administer
125 new or re -open claims and 125 open indemnity claims.
New or re -opened claims exceeding 125 and pending open
CJAJ exceeding 125 will be administered at a fee per claim
SAFETY & HEALTH CONSULTING & INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SERVICES:
The charge for loss control consulting services is an hourly
rate of $41. to $125., plus expenses. These services will
be estimated on a project by project basis with guaranteed
costs "not to exceed", The charge for industrial hygiene
services is on an "as need" basis hourly, plus expenses,
FIELD INVESTIGATION AND OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES:
The charge for field and investigative services and outside
services such as mandatory conference, hearing or trial
ttendance is $65.. per hour, plus expenses.
SPECIAL OR ADDITIONAL COMPUTER INFORMATION:
All reports, data processing, training and services are
included in the annual fee, If additional reports, special
,reports, conversion or special programming or information is
n,=eded, costs will be actual as incurred,
-GOVERNING LAW
This Agre ment shall,be interpreted and c-cistrued in
accordance wit] the laws of the State of California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Amendment day and year hereinbelow written. All other
terms and conditions remain in full €"ee, l
THE CITY OF LODI GREENFIEL1)gT40HPSOWXS49C, INC.
BY:
Thomas A. Peterson
TITLE: City Manager
DATE:
BY:
TITLE:
DATE I- /D9^ r/
amended 10-02-91 APPROVED AS TO BORNE•
ATTEST=
Bob McNatt, City Attorney
Alice M. Keimche, City Clerk
SEP 13
September 12, 1991 C►tyManaBe'sOtfice
Mr. Jerry L. Glenn
Assistant City Manager
The City of Lodi
s 221 West Pine Street
P. O. Box 3006
Dodi, CA 95241-1910
6
Re: Renewal of Workers' Compensation Claim
Administration Contract - 1991
Dear Jerry:
The current pricing for claims administration services
expires on November 1, 1991. our contract will
i automatically renew and is subject to changes, including
requests for fee increases, approved by both parties.
We are requesting an 13.60 overall increase or $600 per
month due the additional services required of GTA to
comply with AB -276, SB -47 and AB -2910 which became
effective January 1, 1991, and the increase in open
indemnity claims.
While we still do not know the full impact of the 1989
Reform Act and AB -2910, the clean-up legislation, we are
experiencing increases in our costs of doing business as
examiner and support staff must be added to prepare,
document and present information on reporting, penalties
and audit procedures as well as a host of new procedures
and activities the examiner must perform and document on
each claim file in preparation for the Office of Benefit
Enforcement audits.
A review of the Annual Reports and computer information
shows the open indemnity claims count has increased 13.60
from 125 to 142 which follows the 21.5% increase in new
indemnity claim reported. There is a direct percentage
relationship between the number of open indemnity files
and our fee increase request.
7020 !Coll Ccnt¢r Nrkway. Suitc 191
Pp.. 114rx 1RR5
Plcrcmton, CA 94566.OIRR
415 .I?h x26,