Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 4, 1991 (93)CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION r *tet �q<trpF+ AGENDA TITLE: Adoption of Resolutions Establishing Criteria and a Point System for Processing Tentative Maps for Residential Development MEETING DATE: September 4, 1991 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED? ACTION: that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 91-170 which establishes criteria and a point system for processing Tentative Maps for residential development. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The material covered by the Resolution is the same information presented at the City Council "shirt sleeve" session of August 27, 1991. FUNDING: None required. B. Schroeder CoY mmunit Development Director JBS/c9 y THOMAS A. PETERSON geyl'tenl pa{�+ Ciiv Mar►aa©r CGt CCCD91.20/TXTD.01C RESOLUTION NO. 91-170 ----------------------- ----------------------- A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING CRITERIA AND A POINT SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING TENTATIVE MAPS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Lodi City Council, by Ordinance No. 1521, adopted September 18, 1991 has provided for the establishment of certain development criteria and a point system for processing of tentative maps, parcel maps, and other approvals under the Subdivision Map Act, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Lodi City Council that the following criteriajpoint system is established: Evaluation Criteria. (The criteria listed below have been developed to be consistent with current City policies and State laws.) A. Agricultural Land Conflicts Score I. Project does not require conversion of vacant agricultural land 10 6. Project is adjacent to agricultural land on one side 7 3. Project is adjacent to agricultural land on taro sides 5 4. Project is adjacent to agricultural land on three sides 3 5. Project is surrounded by agricultural land 0 B. Cn-site Agricultural Land Mitigation 1. Project needs no agricultural land mitigation 10 2. Adequate on-site buffer has been provided as a part of site layout for all adjacent agricultural 1 and 7 a. On-site buffer provided as a part of site layout for only part of the project 5 4. No buffer between project and adjacent agricultural land 0 C. General Location - A neap showing such priority shall be adopted or updated from time to time by the Council, and shall be available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. 1. Project located within Priority Area 1 200 2. Project located within Priority Area 2 100 3. Project located within Priority Area 3 0 -2- D. Relationship to Public Services 1. General Location a. Project abuts existing development on four sides 10 b. Project abuts existing development on three sides 7 c. Project abuts existing development on two sides 5 d. Project abuts existing development on one side 3 e. Project is surrounded by undeveloped land 0 2. Wastewater a. Project i s located adjacent to existing Master Plan sanitary sewers or mains designed to serve the project, 10 b. Project will extend a Master Plan line within its boundaries 8 c. Project will extend a Kaster Plan line outside of its boundaries but within existing right -of way (0 if right-of-way is necessary) 4 -3- d. Project requires construction of a new lift station for which funds are available in the Sewer Impact Fee Fund 0 e. Project requires construction of a new lift station for which funds are not available in the Sewer Impact Fee Fund 3. Water a. Project is located adjacent to existing Master Plan water mains or mains designed to serve the project 10 b. Project will extc,id Master Plan lines within its boundari e s 8 c. Project will extend Master Plan lines outside its boundaries, but within existing right-of-way (0 if outside right-of-way) 4 d. Project requires construction of a new water well for which funds are available in the Water Impact Fee Fund 0 -4- e. Project requires construction of new water well for which funds are not available in the Water Impact Fee Fund x f. Project improves the existing system (i.e., eliniinates dead -ends, loops master plan lines, provides a well site) +l to 3 4. Drainage a. Project is served by an existing drainage basin and Master Plan line or mains designed to serve the project 10 b. Project will extend a Master Plan line or expand an existing basin within its boundaries 8 c. Project will extend a Master Plan line or expand an existing basin outside of its boundaries blit within existing rights-of-way (0 points i f right-of-way is necessary 4 d. Project requires construction of a new r)asin for which funds are available in the Master Drainage Impact Fee Fund 0 -5- e. Project requires construction of a new basin for which funds are a -at available in the Master Drainage Impact Fee Fund E. Promotion of Ooen Space Foints shall be awarded on the basis of the percentage of coverage of the total loss of project area by roof area and paved areas on-site (exclusive of streets). 20% or less 10 points 30% or less 8 points 40%cr less 6 points 50% 4 points 60% 2 points 70% or greater 0 points Project owner shall submit an analysis of the percentage of impervious surface of the site. This section shall not apply to single-family residential. F. Traffic 1. Project widens or improves an existing faci ity 2. Project will extend Master Plan streets within i t s boundaries Im 10 0 3. Project will extend Master Plan streets outside its boundaries, but within existing right-of-way ( 0 if outside right-of-way) 4 4. Project requires roadway improvements for which funds are available in the Street Impact Fee Program 0 5. Project requires roadway improvements for which funds are moat available in the Street Impact Fee Program 6. Project improves circulation by providing additional access to adjacent development (including non-vehicuiar access) +1 to 5 G. Housing 1. Low and Moderate Income Housing. A point credit will be awarded with the following schedule: -7- 25% or more of units low and moderate 10 20%-24% 15%-19% 10%44% E 6 4 5 0-9% 2 Less than 5r0 1 ow and moderate or low and moderate housing proposed 0 * Indicates project cannot proceed without provision for construction of the appropriate facility. H. Site Plan and Project Design --Bonus Points (These criteria shall only apply to multi -family projects). 1. Landscaping. (Planning Commission shall evaluate and provide between 10 and 0 points) (These criteria shall only apply to multi -family projects). 2. Architectural Design. (SPARC Committee shall evaluate and provide between 10 and 0 points) (These criteria shall only apply to multi -family projects.) -8- I. Schools 1. Project is within 1/4 mile of an existing (or proposed) elementary school to 2. Project is within 1/2 mile of an existing (or proposed] elementary school 5 3. Project is more than 1/2 mile from an existing or proposed el emeotary school 0 4. Project i s within 1/2 mile of an existing (or proposed) middle school. to 5. Project is within 1 mile of an existing or proposed middle school 5 6. Project is more than 1 mile from an existing or proposed middle school p 7. Project is within 1 mile of an existing or proposed high school 10 II. Project is within 2 miles of an existing or proposed high school 5 10 J. Fire Protection. (Proximity to fire protection services) - Within 3 minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station 10 - Within 4 minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station 5 - Beyond 4 minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station 0 Dated: September 4, 1991 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 91-170 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held September 4, 1991 by the following vote: Ayes : Council Members - Pennino, Pinkerton, Sieglock, Snider and Hinchman (Mayor) Noes : Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - hone �(C(�- 1 t Alice M_ Reimche City Clerk 91-170 RES91170/TXTA.02J -10-