HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - August 19, 1992 (102)! �ap
CITY OF LO
' , I I , ,•
AGMWA TT=: Communications ( August 6, 1992 through August 11, 1992
MEETISG DATE: August 19, 1992
PREPARED BY: Kirk J. Avans, Administrative Assistant to the City Manager
FttCWCMED AMOK:
SQA I= REMMIUMMME
x la, b, c, That the City Council by motion action deny the folloving
verified claims filed against the City of Lodi and refer
them back to the City's Contract Administrator, Insurance
Consulting Associates, Inc. (ICA) .
a) David Brien, Date of loss 7/3/92
b) Miracle Recreation, et al, Date of lose
4/17/91
C) Shasta Dam Area public Utility District.
Date of loss. 1/24/92
BLLoJ3R0UHD IL4 IWATIQN: Following review of these verified claims filed against
the City of Lodi, the City Attorney and the City's
Contract Administrator, Insurance Consulting Associates,
Inc. (ICA) recotmend that the City Council deny the
subject claims and refer them back to ICA.
Additional information regarding these claims are contained in a Confidential
envelope addressed to each Council Member.
FUIEDING : Bone required.
KJH:tp
APPROVED: _.__ IMP.-
?inist
tine Assistant
4he City Manager
r
THOMAS A. PETERSON
City marmow
cr-- i
CITY COUNCIL
.TAMES w.. PR4KUrF0N, Mtyw
PMUP A PENNINO
Magor Pro Tempore
W I D M. MNCHMAN
WA
JOHN R. Windy) SNIDER
CITY OF 1LODI
CITY HALL, 231 WEST PW- STREET
PA BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209) 3345634
FAX(" 3334795
August 20, 1992
Rudy Nolen, Attorney at Lahr
Schuering Zia=* ma
Scully 6 Nolen
7919 Folsom Blvd., Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95826
Re: Miracle Recreation Equipement Comparsy and Dale Green
vs. city Of Lodi
Dear Mr- No,'.e+n s
THOMAS A. PETERSON
City Ma OOK
ALICE M. REIMCHE
Cny Ckrk
BOB M[NATT
City Anomey
Notice is hereby given that the claim which you presented to the City
on July 30, 1992, is rejected as of the date of this letter.
Subject to certain excep t i ons , you have only six (6) modths from the
date that this notice was personp-Ily delivered or deposited in the mail
to file a court action on this claim. See Goveaxrgment Code Section
945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in
connection with this matter. If you desire to consult with an
attorney, you should do so immediately.
Please also be advised that, pursuant to Sections 128.5 and 1038 of the
California Code of Civil Procedure, the City rill seek to recover all
costs of defense in the event an action ie filed in this matter and it
is determined that the action was not brought in good faith and with
reasaneble cause.
Sincerely,
7h 0AW-A&J
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
AMR/tp
cc: Insurance Consulting Associates
W
CITY COUNCIL
JAMES W. PINKERTON, Mayor
PHILLIP A. PENNIP40
Mayor Pm TwuVore
DMAD M. HtNCHMAN
;ACK A SIEGLOCK
"N R Warncly) SNIDER
David
dftm
CITY OF LQDI
CITY HALL, 221 VVES ME STREET
PA BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209) 334-5634
FAX 12091331-W95
UT -2 • I I - - • 1
August 20, 1992
Re: David,Brien vs. City of Lodi
Dear Mr. B r i m:
THOMAS A. PETERSON
City Munger
ALICE M REIMCHE
City Clerk
BOB MCNATT
Ory AftonW
Notice is hereby given that the claim which you presented to the City
on July 8, 1992, is rejected as of the date of this letter.
Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) Atha from the
date that this notice was personally delivered or deposited in the mail
to tile, a court action on this Clain. Fet Government Code Section
945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in
connection with this matter. If you desire to consult with an
attorney, you should do so immediately.
Please also be advised that, pursuant Lo Sections 128.5 and 1038 of the
Californim Code of Civil Procedure, the City will seek to recover all
costa of defense in the event an action is filed in this matter and it
is determined that the action was not brought in 9vod faith and with
reasonable cause.
Sincerely,
961%-
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
AMR/ tp
cc: Insurance Consulting Associates
RSJSCT/T%TA.TLP/GL
CITY COUNOL
JAMES W PlNKERTON, Mayor
PHILLIP A PENNINO
Mayor Pro TenVere
W I D M. H W30AAN
JACK A 5IEGLOCK
)OHN R. Wm,60 SNIDER
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
Ra BOX 3006
IODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209) 334--5634
FAX iwio9! 333-4793
August 20, 1992
John N. Gould
Michael 0- Holmes
Lane Powell Spears Lubersky
520 S.W. Yamhill Street, Suite Boo
Portland, OR 97204
Re: Shaster Dam Area Public Utility District vs. City G.f
Dear Mr. 0ould and Mr. Holmes:
THOMAS A. PMRSON
City Martlr
ALICE M_ REIMCHE
City Clerk
BOB McNATT
City Attorney
Notice is hereby given that the claim which you presented to the City
on July 23, 1992, is rejected as of the date of this letter.
I
Subject to certain exceptions, you have only six (6) months from the
date that this notice was personally delivered or depn'Rited in the mail
to file a court action on this claim. See Government Code Section
945.6. You may seek the advice of an attorney of your choice in
connection with thia matter. If you desire to consult with an
attorney, you should do so immediately.
Please also be advised that. pursuant to Sections 128.5 and 1038 of the
California Code of Civil Procedure, the City will seek to recover all
costs of defense in the event an action is filed in this mater and it
is determined that trio action was not brought in good faith and with
reasonable uauase .
Sincerely.
(Eiit1FJ rte'.
Alice M. Reinche
City Clerk
AMR/tp
cc: Transmission Agency of Northern California
cc: Dennis w. DeCuir, Esquire