HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - March 18, 2009 K-01AGENDA ITEM V.— l
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt ResolutionsAuthorizing City Managerto Execute Professional Services
Agreement with HDR, Inc., of Folsom, for Preparationof Preliminary Design and
Environmental Impact Report for Surface Water Treatment Facility ($857,924) and
Execute Second Amendment to 2003 Agreement for Purchase of Water from
Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID) by City of Lodi Permitting City to Sell a Portion
of Its Banked Water and Appropriating Funds ($987,000)
MEETING DATE: March 18, 2009
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolutions authorizing the City Managerto execute a
professional services agreementwith HDR, Inc., of Folsom, for the
preparation of preliminary design and environmental impact report
for the Surface Water Treatment Facility and execute the Second
Amendment to the 2003 Agreement for Purchase of Water from Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID) by
the City of Lodi permitting the City to sell a portion of its banked water and appropriating funds in the
amount of $987,000 as shown below.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 4,2007, the City Council gave approval for HDR, Inc., of
Folsom, to prepare the Surface Water Treatment Facility
Conceptual Design and Feasibility Evaluation.
That work was completed and presented to the City Council on July 1, 2008 at a regular meeting. This
contract approval with HDR, Inc., authorizes the next step of preparing the preliminary plans and the
environmental impact report (EIR) with the objective to qualify the project for funding through the
American Recovery and ReinvestmentAct (ARRA), the federal stimulus program. Fundingforthe
preliminary design and EIR would ultimately come from the sale of previously purchased, but unused,
WID water permitted in the proposed second amendment to the 2003 agreement, although a loan from
the Water Capital Fund would be needed to cover the short-term costs. If the WID water cannot be sold,
the funding to repay the Water Capital Fund loan would come from future bonded debt issued to finance
the Surface Water Treatment Facility project.
The scope of services, fee and schedule for the HDR agreement is provided in ExhibitA. An accelerated
preliminarydesign/EIR process is proposed in order to meet ARRA schedule requirementsfor the EIR to
be completed within 12 months. The structure of the HDR contractwill allow construction of the plant to
occur under a designlbuild format or a conventional design/bid/build format. The construction format
decision would be made by City Council at a future date when the funding sources for the project are
known. As a note, the designlbuild format is not permitted under the ARRA funding program.
Funding for the HDR contract and staff support costs could ultimately come from the sale of banked
water underthe 2003 Agreement for Purchase of Water from Woodbridge Irrigation District by the
APPROVED: /
Blair King–,Gi#@rWnager
K:\WPIPROJECTS\WATER1SurfaceWaterPlant\CAwardWaterDesign.doc 3/13/2009
Adopt Resolutions Authorizing City Managerto Execute Professional Services Agreementwith
HDR, Inc., of Folsom, for Preparation of Preliminary Design and Environmental Impact Report for Surface
Water Treatment Facility ($857,924) and Execute Second Amendment to 2003 Agreement for Purchase
of Water from Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID) by City of Lodi Permitting City to Sell a Portion of Its
Banked Water and Appropriating Funds ($987,000)
March 18, 2009
Page 2
City of Lodi (Agreement). For the City to sell WID water to another entity, it requires approval of the
WID Board. A Second Amendment to the Agreement has been prepared by WID and City staff and is
attached as Exhibit B. City Council will recall the First Amendment to the Agreement provided a four-year
extension to the life of the Agreement and its banking provision. The principal provisions of the Second
Amendment are:
1. City will have the option to sell up to 18,000 acre-feet of water banked in the initial
three years of the Agreement with a sale limit of 6,000 acre-feet per year
2. City will receive WID Board approval each year a sale occurs
3. City will reimburse WID for costs associated with completing the transfer and sale of
the WID water
4. Proceeds from the sale must be used for planning, design, construction and
associated costs for the water treatment facility
The minimum sale price for the water will be the City cost ($200 per acre-foot) plus additional costs
associated with the sale, transfer and administration of the transaction. With the statewide drought
declared by the Governor, we anticipate numerous agencies will be looking for water purchase
opportunities. Staff will be working directly with these agencies as they are identified and through the
California Drought Water Bank.
The firm of HDR, Inc., of Folsom, has again teamed with West Yost &Associates, of Davis. Both firms
are highly qualified in the design of surfacewater treatment facilities. The contractfee of $857,924 is
within the range expected by Public Works staff. A total appropriation of $987,000 is requested. The
total appropriation accounts for staff time required to administer the project and contingencies to cover
unexpected charges during the preliminarydesign/EIR phase.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sale of 6,000 acre-feetat a minimum price of $200 per acre-footwill off -set
design costs of $987.000.
FUNDING AVAILABLE: Requested Appropriation: Water Utility Capital Fund (Infrastructure
Replacement) (181) $987,000
Jordan Ayers
Deputy City Manager/Internal Services Director
A� )a dAaU'&--
F. Wally Saffidelin
Public Works Director
FWSIpmf
Attachments
K:IWPIPROJECTSIWATERISuAaceWaterPlant\CAwardWaterDesign.doc 311312009
Exhibit A
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
ARTICLE 1
PARTIES AND PURPOSE
Section 1.1 Parties
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on by and between the
CITY OF LODI, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY), and HDR, INC. (hereinafter
"CONSULTANT").
Section 1.2 Purpose
CITY selected the CONSULANT to provide the conceptual design services
required in accordance with attached scope of services, Exhibit A.
CITY wishes to enter into an agreement with CONSULTANT for PRELIMINARY
DESIGN SERVICES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR SURFACE
WATER TREATMENT FACILITY project (hereinafter "Project") as set forth in the Scope
of Services attached here as Exhibit A.
ARTICLE 2
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Section 2.1 Scope of Services
CONSULTANT, for the benefit and at the direction of CITY, shall perform the
scope of services as set forth in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated by this reference.
Section 2.2 Time For Commencement and Completion of Work
CONSULTANT shall commence work within ten (10) days of executing this
Agreement, and complete work under this Agreement based on the schedule included in
Exhibit A.
CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for delays caused by the failure of CITY
staff or agents to provide required data or review documents within the appropriate time
frames. The review time by CITY and any other agencies involved in the project shall
not be counted against CONSULTANT's contract performance period. Also, any delays
due to weather, vandalism, acts of God, etc., shall not be counted. CONSULTANT shall
remain in contact with reviewing agencies and make all efforts to review and return all
comments.
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\Su rfaceWaterPlant\AGREEMENT_HDR_PrelimDesign EIR.doc 1
Section 2.3 Meetings
CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as indicated in the Scope of Services,
Exhibit A.
Section 2.4 Staffing
CONSULTANT acknowledges that CITY has relied on CONSULTANT's
capabilities and on the qualifications of CONSULTANT's principals and staff as identified
in its proposal to CITY. The scope of services shall be performed by CONSULTANT,
unless agreed to otherwise by CITY in writing. CITY shall be notified by CONSULTANT
of any change of Project Manager and CITY is granted the right of approval of all
original, additional and replacement personnel in CITY's sole discretion and shall be
notified by CONSULTANT of any changes of CONSULTANT's project staff prior to any
change.
CONSULTANT represents that it is prepared to and can perform all services
within the scope of services specified in Exhibit A. CONSULTANT represents that it has,
or will have at the time this Agreement is executed, all licenses, permits, qualifications,
insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature are legally required for CONSULTANT to
practice its profession, and that CONSULTANT shall, at its own cost and expense, keep
in effect during the life of this Agreement all such licenses, permits, qualifications,
insurance and approvals.
Section 2.5 Subcontracts
CITY acknowledges that CONSULTANT may subcontract certain portions of the
scope of services to subconsultants as specified and identified in Exhibit A. Should any
subconsultants be replaced or added after CITY's approval, CITY shall be notified within
ten (10) days and said subconsultants shall be subject to CITY's approval prior to
initiating any work on the Project. CONSULTANT shall remain fully responsible for the
complete and full performance of said services and shall pay all such subconsultants.
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterPlantWGREEMENT_HDR_PrelimDesignElR.doc 2
ARTICLE 3
COMPENSATION
Section 3.1 Compensation
CONSULTANT's compensation for all work under this Agreement shall conform
to and shall not exceed the provisions of Fee Proposal, attached as a portion of
Exhibit A.
CONSULTANT shall not undertake any work beyond the scope of this
Agreement unless such additional work is approved in advance and in writing by CITY.
Section 3.2 Method of Pavment
CONSULTANT shall submit invoices for completed work on a monthly basis,
providing, without limitation, details as to amount of hours, individual performing said
work, hourly rate, and indicating to what aspect of the scope of services said work is
attributable.
Section 3.3 Costs
The fees shown on Exhibit A include all reimbursable costs required for the
performance of the individual work tasks by CONSULTANT and/or subconsultant and
references to reimbursable costs located on any fee schedules shall not apply. Payment
of additional reimbursable costs shall be approved in writing by CITY.
CONSULTANT charge rates are attached and incorporated with Exhibit A. The
charge rates for CONSULTANT shall remain in effect and unchanged for the duration of
the Project unless approved by CITY.
Section 3.4 Auditing
CITY reserves the right to periodically audit all charges made by CONSULTANT
to CITY for services under this Agreement. Upon request, CONSULTANT agrees to
furnish CITY, or a designated representative, with necessary information and assistance.
CONSULTANT agrees that CITY or its delegate will have the right to review,
obtain and copy all records pertaining to performance of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT agrees to provide CITY or its delegate with any relevant information
requested and shall permit CITY or its delegate access to its premises, upon reasonable
notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and
inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be
relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with
this requirement. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain such records for a period of
three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement.
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterP la ntWGREEMENT_HDR_PrelimDesign EIR.doc 3
ARTICLE 4
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Section 4.1 Nondiscrimination
In performing services under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall not
discriminate in the employment of its employees or in the engagement of any
subconsultants on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital
status, national origin, ancestry, age, or any other criteria prohibited by law.
Section 4.2 Responsibility for Damage
CONSULTANT shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Lodi, the City
Council, elected and appointed Boards, Commissions, all officers and employees or
agent from any suits, claims or actions brought by any person or persons for or on
account of any injuries or damages sustained or arising from the services performed in
this Agreement but only to the extent caused by the negligent acts, errors or omissions
of the consultant and except those injuries or damages arising out of the active
negligence of the City of Lodi or its agents, officers or agents.
Section 4.3 No Personal Liability
Neither the City Council, the City Engineer, nor any other officer or authorized
assistant or agent or employee shall be personally responsible for any liability arising
under this Agreement.
Section 4.4 Responsibility of CITY
CITY shall not be held responsible for the care or protection of any material or
parts of the work prior to final acceptance, except as expressly provided herein.
Section 4.5 Insurance Requirements for CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain during the life of this Agreement,
insurance coverage as listed below. These insurance policies shall protect
CONSULTANT and any subcontractor performing work covered by this Agreement from
claims for damages for personal injury, including accidental death, as well as from
claims for property damages, which may arise from CONSULTANT'S operations under
this Agreement, whether such operations be by CONSULTANT or by any subcontractor
or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them, and the amount of such
insurance shall be as follows:
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterPlantWGREEMENT_HDR_PrelimDesignElR.doc 4
1. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury -
Ea. Occurrence/Aggregate
$1,000,000 Property Damage -
Ea. Occurrence/Aggregate
or
$1,000,000 Combined Single Limits
2. COMPREHENSIVE AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury - Ea. Person
$1,000,000 Bodily Injury - Ea. Occurrence
$1,000,000 Property Damage - Ea. Occurrence
or
$1,000,000 Combined Single Limits
NOTE: CONSULTANT agrees and stipulates that any insurance coverage
provided to CITY shall provide for a claims period following termination of coverage.
A copy of the certificate of insurance with the following endorsements shall be
furnished to CITY:
(a) Additional Named Insured Endorsement
Such insurance as is afforded by this policy shall also apply to the City of Lodi, its
elected and appointed Boards, Commissions, Officers, Agents and Employees as
additional named insureds insofar as work performed by the insured under written
Agreement with CITY. (This endorsement shall be on a form furnished to CITY and
shall be included with CONSULTANT'S policies.)
(b) Primary Insurance Endorsement
Such insurance as is afforded by the endorsement for the Additional Insureds shall
apply as primary insurance. Any other insurance maintained by the City of Lodi or
its officers and employees shall be excess only and not contributing with the
insurance afforded by this endorsement.
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterPlant\AGREEMENT HDR_PrelimDesignEIRAoc 5
(c) Severability of Interest Clause
The term "insured" is used severally and not collectively, but the inclusion herein of
more than one insured shall not operate to increase the limit of the company's
liability.
(d) Notice of Cancellation or Change in Coverage Endorsement
This policy may not be canceled by the company without 30 days' prior written
notice of such cancellation to the City Attorney, City of Lodi, P.O. Box 3006, Lodi,
CA 95241.
(e) CONSULTANT agrees and stipulates that any insurance coverage provided to
CITY shall provide for a claims period following termination of coverage which is at
least consistent with the claims period or statutes of limitations found in the
California Tort Claims Act (California Government Code Section 810 et seq.).
"Claims made" coverage requiring the insureds to give notice of any potential
liability during a time period shorter than that found in the Tort Claims Act shall be
unacceptable.
Section 4.6 Worker's Compensation Insurance
CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain during the life of this Agreement,
Worker's Compensation Insurance for all of CONSULTANT'S employees employed at
the site of the project and, if any work is sublet, CONSULTANT shall require the
subcontractor similarly to provide Worker's Compensation Insurance for all of the latter's
employees unless such employees are covered by the protection afforded by the
CONSULTANT. In case any class of employees engaged in hazardous work under this
Agreement at the site of the project is not protected under the Worker's Compensation
Statute, CONSULTANT shall provide and shall cause each subcontractor to provide
insurance for the protection of said employees. This policy may not be canceled nor the
coverage reduced by the company without 30 days' prior written notice of such
cancellation or reduction in coverage to the City Attorney, City of Lodi, P.O. Box 3006,
Lodi, CA, 95241.
Section 4.7 Attorney's Fees
In the event any dispute between the parties arises under or regarding this
Agreement, the prevailing party in any litigation of the dispute shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney's fees from the party who does not prevail as determined by the
court.
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterPlant\AGREEMENT_HDR_PrelimDesignEIR.doc 6
Section 4.8 Successors and Assigns
CITY and CONSULTANT each bind themselves, their partners, successors,
assigns, and legal representatives to this Agreement without the written consent of the
others. CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement
without the prior written consent of CITY. Consent to any such transfer shall be at the
sole discretion of CITY.
Section 4.9 Notices
Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed
to have been given when the same is personally served or sent by certified mail or
express or overnight delivery, postage prepaid, addressed to the respective parties as
follows:
To CITY: City of Lodi
F. Wally Sandelin, Public Works Director
221 West Pine Street
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
To CONSULTANT: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Timothy R. Fleming, Senior Vice President
2365 Iron Point Road, Suite 300
Folsom, CA 95630
Section 4.10 Cooperation of CITY
CITY shall cooperate fully in a timely manner in providing relevant information
that it has at its disposal.
Section 4.11 CONSULTANT is Not an Employee of CITY
It is understood that CONSULTANT is not acting hereunder in any manner as an
employee of CITY, but solely under this Agreement as an independent contractor.
Section 4.12 Termination
CITY may terminate this Agreement by giving CONSULTANT at least ten (10)
days written notice. Where phases are anticipated within the Scope of Services, at
which an intermediate decision is required concerning whether to proceed further, CITY
may terminate at the conclusion of any such phase. Upon termination, CONSULTANT
shall be entitled to payment as set forth in the attached Exhibit A to the extent that the
work has been performed. Upon termination, CONSULTANT shall immediately suspend
all work on the Project and deliver any documents or work in progress to CITY.
However, CITY shall assume no liability for costs, expenses or lost profits resulting from
KAWP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterP lantWGREEMENT_HDR—Prelim Design EIR.doc 7
services not completed or for contracts entered into by CONSULTANT with third parties
in reliance upon this Agreement.
Section 4.13 Severability
The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void
or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.
Section 4.14 Captions
The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for
convenience only and shall not be deemed to be relevant in resolving any question or
interpretation or intent.
Section 4.15 Integration and Modification
This Agreement represents the entire integrated Agreement between
CONSULTANT and CITY; supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or
Agreements, whether written or oral, between the parties; and may be amended only be
written instrument signed by CONSULTANT and CITY.
Section 4.16 Applicable Law and Venue
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue
for any court proceeding brought under this Agreement will be with the San Joaquin
County Superior Court.
Section 4.17 Contract Terms Prevail
All exhibits and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single
document. Should any inconsistency occur between the specific terms of this
Agreement and the attached exhibits, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
Section 4.18 Authority
The undersigned hereby represent and warrant that they are authorized by the
parties to execute this Agreement.
Section 4.19 Ownership of Documents
All documents, photographs, reports, analyses, audits, computer tapes or cards,
or other material documents or data, and working papers, whether or not in final form,
which have been obtained or prepared for this project, shall be deemed the property of
CITY. Upon CITY's request, CONSULTANT shall allow CITY to inspect all such
documents during regular business hours. Upon termination or completion, all
information collected, work product and documents shall be delivered by CONSULTANT
to CITY within ten (10) days.
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterPlant\AGREEMENT_HDR_PrelimDesignEIR.doc 8
CITY agrees to indemnify, defend and hold CONSULTANT harmless from any
liability resulting from CITY's use of such documents for any purpose other than the
Purposefor which they were prepared.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONSULTANT have executed this
Agreement as of the date first above written.
ATTEST:
By
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
A: '-
CITY OF LODI, a municipal corporation
BLAIR KING
CITY MANAGER
HDR, Inc.
By:
Its:
K:\WP\PROJECTS\WATER\SurfaceWaterPlant\AGREEMENT_HDR_PrelimDesignEIR.doc 9
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Lodi
Surface Water Treatment Facility and Transmission Project -
Preparation CEQA and 30% Design -Bid -Build Documents
The tasks described below are for the production of contract document complete to the 30
percent level of design and the associated environmental documents required for construction.
The 30 percent design will be completed to a level of detail congruent with a conventional
design -bid -build project.
TASK 1 — PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY
CONTROL (QA/QC)
Subtask 1.1 - Project Management
This subtask includes the management activities required to ensure the project is completed on
time and within budget, and addresses the City's goals. A project management work plan will be
developed to serve as a communication tool for the City, HDR staff, and subconsultants. HDR
will prepare invoices and decision log updates on a monthly basis. Other activities include
coordinating with the subconsultants, scheduling staff, coordinating the quality assurance effort,
and preparation of invoices and contract amendments.
Deliverables: Project management workplan, monthly invoices, and decision log updates.
Subtask 1.2 - QA/QC Program
HDR will institute and maintain a QA/QC program for the work performed on this project. To
ensure objectivity, senior technical staff not specifically involved in the project will assist with
the internal QA/QC upon completion of all deliverables before they are submitted.
Deliverables: To be incorporated into the design documents.
TASK 2 — 30 PERCENT DESIGN
Subtask 2.1 - Kick-off Meeting and Yucaipa Water Treatment Plant Site Visit
HDR will meet with the City to introduce the project team, discuss project goals and objectives,
and establish lines of communications. The meeting will focus on recommendations made in the
Conceptual Design and Feasibility Evaluation report, developing floor and site plans, identifying
outstanding issues, and discussing potential solutions. A site visit and tour of the Yucaipa Water
Treatment Plant will also be conducted to assist in the decision-making process. Additionally,
08229 3/4/2009 A-1
HDR will solicit preferences, concerns, and ideas from the City regarding the design of their
facilities.
Deliverables: Meeting agenda and minutes.
Subtask 2.2 - Topographic Site Survey
HDR's surveying subconsultant will prepare a survey and base map for the water treatment plant,
raw water pump station, and pipeline routes, which will include:
Establishing a primary horizontal and vertical survey control network that covers the entire
project area. Horizontal control will be based on the North American Datum of 1983
(NAD83) and converted to the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 3 as referenced
by available National Geodetic Survey (NGS) and/or City survey control monuments.
Vertical control will be based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88),
the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), or the City Vertical Datum.
• Furnishing aerial photogrammetry to develop the topographic surveys, which will include
aerial control panels at locations and frequency adequate for 1" = 40' scale mapping, with 1'
contour intervals showing all visible surface features, contours, and spot elevations within the
mapping limits. Providing an ortho-corrected and rectified digital black and white photo
background within the mapping limits and a high altitude digital color image.
• Providing ground surveys to collect critical design elements (i.e., existing utilities) necessary
for the completion of the project.
• Researching and mapping of existing utilities, including the City's, USA subscribers, and
utilities posted in the vicinity of the project. Utility information should be provided in a
drawing file tied into the project horizontal control and referenced to the project base
mapping. It is assumed that the City will provide as -built documentation of City -owned
facilities.
• Furnishing boundary base map showing the existing conditions boundary and right-of-way
lines and adjoining parcels with owners of record and available assessor's numbers. This
should include preparation of a Record of Survey tied into the project horizontal control
system showing all survey monuments found.
Deliverables: Base maps suitable for design and Record of Survey for Sites.
Subtask 2.3 - Geotechnical Investigation
HDR's geotechnical subconsultant will update the geotechnical investigation for the water
treatment plant site and conduct geotechnical investigations of the raw water pumping station
and pipeline routes. This subtask will include the following:
08229 3/4/2009 A-2
Geotechnical Field Exploration
Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc., will explore subsurface conditions along each of the pipeline
segments by advancing a series of borings along the new planned pipeline alignments. It is
assumed that six to eight borings will be required along the raw water line, and five to six
borings will be required along the proposed transmission pipeline alignment. Additional borings
at the water treatment plant are not expected to be needed since their previous exploration was
conducted in this area. It is assumed that pipeline depths exploration depths on the order of 15
feet below existing grades will be adequate to characterize soil and groundwater conditions
within the planned pipeline excavation areas. An experienced geologist or engineer will
continuously observe the borings, log the subsurface conditions, collect representative soil
samples, and transport all samples to our laboratoiy for further visual examination and testing.
Before drilling, the local utility locating service (USA) will mark any underground utilities at
each exploration location. Additional assistance might be needed to identify underground
utilities. Upon arrival at the site, equipment and crew will be given ready access to the work
locations. Youngdahl will obtain necessary encroachment permits and drilling permits prior to
site exploration. All borings will be backfilled with a lean concrete slurry and cutting
containerized and off -hauled. They will exercise due care while working at the site, but it should
be realized that some surface disturbance is unavoidable and that complete restoration of any
disturbed areas is not included in our scope of work.
Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
A series of geotechnical laboratory tests will be conducted on selected soil samples obtained
from the geotechnical field explorations to evaluate the engineering and index properties of the
site subsurface materials. These tests will likely include moisture content and dry -density
determinations, Atterberg limit determinations, sieve analysis, modified compaction and
directshear tests, pH, and resistivity as deemed necessary and appropriate. Additionally, a
resistance (R -value) value test will be performed for pavement design purposes.
Samples are stored for about 30 days after submittal of our report and then discard them, unless
prior arrangements are made for longer-term storage.
Geotechnical Review and Report Preparation
To supplement our field exploration and laboratory testing programs, Youngdahl will review
various sources of geotechnical information concerning the project site. Such sources will likely
include geologic maps, seismologic literature, and other published documents. Any available soil
logs and laboratory test results associated with previous subsurface explorations performed on or
near the site will also be reviewed. Field exploration data, laboratory testing data, and research
findings will be evaluated to develop conclusions and recommendations concerning the
geotechnical aspects of the project.
After analyzing the site conditions, a preliminary geotechnical engineering study will be
prepared for the project. The report will include the following specific items:
08229 3/4/2009 A-3
• Site plan showing approximate exploration locations on a base map.
• Descriptive logs of subsurface explorations.
• Description of surface, soil, groundwater, and seismic conditions.
• Conclusions regarding on-site liquefaction potential.
• Conclusions regarding corrosivity.
• Recommended seismic design parameters.
• Recommendations for site preparation.
• Recommendations concerning utility trench excavations, including temporary slope angles.
• Recommendations concerning trench backfill.
• Design criteria for thrust blocks, including allowable bearing pressures.
• Recommendations concerning temporary and permanent drainage systems.
• Recommended asphaltic pavement sections.
• Recommendations for construction monitoring.
• Explanation of report limitations.
• Recommendations for further geotechnical study, if necessary.
Following preparation of the geotechnical report, the construction documents will be reviewed to
assure the plans and specifications incorporated the intent of our recommendations.
Subtask 2.4 - Corrosion Engineering
HDR's corrosion subconsultant will review the findings of the geotechnical investigation,
conduct additional sampling and testing as needed, and develop details and specifications for
corrosion protection systems for the pipelines and storage tank. The following items are included
in this subtask:
Pipeline Alignment Soil Corrosivitv Evaluation
Perform a chemical analysis of the soil samples collected by Youngdahl. The soil samples
will be collected from pipe depth and transferred to an analytical laboratory for chemical
analysis. The soil samples will be analyzed for pH, chlorides, sulfates, resistivity, and Redox
potential using ASTM test methods as detailed in the table below. These soil samples will be
tested by a state certified testing laboratory, CERCO Analytical, Inc. (DOHS Certification
No. 2153) located in Pleasanton, California. The preparation of the soil samples for chemical
analysis will be in accordance with the applicable specifications.
08229 3/4/2009 A-4
Soil Chemical Analysis Test Methods
Chlorides
D4327
pH
D4972
Resistivity
G57
Sulfate
D4327
Redox Potential
D1498
• Evaluate the results of the chemical analysis and determine the corrosivity of the soils along
the alignments to the proposed materials of construction (i.e., ductile iron, dielectric coated
steel, mortar coated steel pipelines, concrete cylinder pipe, and metallic fittings and valves on
PVC/HDPE Piping, etc.).
• Conduct in-situ soil resistivities at a 500- to 1,000 -foot interval along the pipeline
alignments using the Wenner 4 -pin technique. In-situ resistivities will be measured at 2.5',
5', 7.5', 10' and 15' depths using a suitable Resistivity Meter. Barnes layer calculations will
be performed to determine the corrosivity of the different soil layers to the proposed
materials of construction.
• Review the plans and specifications prepared by HDR for construction details and proposed
materials of construction and determine the corrosivity of the proposed alignments to these
materials.
• Review the proposed pipeline alignments for potential stray current problems. If these
pipelines parallel or cross gas and water pipelines as well as overhead high voltage
transmission lines, then these areas represent potential stray current problems. Therefore, it
will be prudent to combine the stray current mitigation and corrosion prevention design for
the new pipelines as warranted.
• Contact other foreign utility owners, such as PG&E, that present potential stray current
problems and discuss design measures to mitigate interference between the new water
pipelines and these existing utilities as warranted as well.
• Prepare a technical memorandum listing the findings from the alignment corrosivity
evaluation and provide recommendations for long-term corrosion control measures for the
new raw water and transmission pipelines along with estimated costs associated with these
measures.
Water Treatment Plant Corrosivity Assessment
• Review the soil sample chemical analysis from geotechnical consultant. The soil samples
were analyzed for pH, chlorides, sulfates, resistivity, and Redox potential
• Conduct in-situ soil resistivities at selected locations throughout the water treatment facility
using the Wenner 4 -pin technique. In-situ resistivities will be measured at 2.5', 5', 7.5', 10'
and 15' depths using a suitable Resistivity Meter. Barnes layer calculations will be
08229 3/4/2009 A-5
performed to determine the corrosivity of the different soil layers to the proposed pipeline
materials.
• Review the plans and profiles for the new facility prepared by HDR for construction details
and proposed pipeline materials and determine the suitability of the proposed materials based
on the collected field and laboratory data.
Prepare a technical memorandum, which will provide a summary of the field data collected
along with the chemical analysis of the soil samples and an analysis of this data. The
potential for corrosion on the new process pipelines will be determined based on the analysis
and recommendations for the long-term prevention of corrosion will be included for all pipe
material options. All fieldwork and recommendations will be in compliance with applicable
NA CE and local district standards. The technical memorandum will also contain the design
criteria for the proposed corrosion prevention system.
• Develop cost estimates to determine the most economical means of providing long term
corrosion control to the subject underground process pipelines.
Subtask 2.5 - 30 Percent Design
A preliminary design report has been replaced with a substantial 30 percent submittal that
includes aspects of the preliminary design report. This submittal will include new TMs and select
TMs from the Conceptual Design and Feasibility Evaluation report, updated for specific design
criteria and including specifications and drawings sufficient to convey the design intent.
2.5.1- Design TMs:
The TMs will include:
• Resign assumptions.
• Specific process recommendations.
• Applicable design criteria for buildings, tanks, pumps, filters, and other key components.
• Hydraulic calculations.
• 30 percent cost estimate.
The following table presents a preliminary listing of TMs priced in the scope of work that will be
included in the preliminary design.
of Preliminary Design TMs
TM 1 1 Executive Summary and Cost Estimate
TM 2—, Water Quality and Regulatory Considerations
TM 3 1 Raw Water Pump Station and Pipeline
08229 3/4/2009 A-6
Listing of Preliminary Design TMs —_—'
TM 4 Pretreatment and Membrane Systems
TM 5 Chemical Systems and Disinfection
TM 6
Residuals Handling
TM 7_—.1.^Site
Plan
TM 8
1 Plant Hydraulics
TM 9__j
Blending/Corrosion/Distribution System
TM 10
Finished Water Storage and Pump Station
TM 11
Finished Water Transmission Main
TM 12
Well Modifications
TM 13
Building Architecture
TM 14
Plumbing, Plant Water, and HVAC
TM 15
Electrical Systems~
TM 16
Instrumentation and Control (SCADA)
TM 17
Security Considerations
TM 18
Environmental Compliance and Permitting
TM 19
Project Implementation and Construction Sequencing
TM 20
Surface Water Treatment Facility Operations and Staffing Plan
Deliverables: Five bound copies of the 30 percent design report for review and comment by City
staff.
2.5.2 - 30 Percent Drawings and Specifications:
The 30 percent drawings will include:
• Raw water pipeline preliminary plan and profile.
• Process flow schematic(s).
• Hydraulic profile for the facility.
• Site plan complete with utility connections, location of piping, tanks, pumps, and other
appurtenant facilities.
• Floor plans and elevations of raw water pumping station, operations building, and chemical
building.
• Well modifications site plans showing piping, utilities, and other appurtenant facilities.
08229 3/4/2009 A-7
• Process and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for water treatment plant and well
modifications.
• Treated water transmission pipeline preliminary plans and profiles.
• An electrical utility plan showing the service connection.
• Electrical single -line drawings.
• Engineer's opinion of construction cost.
Specifications will include filters, piping, valves, and major equipment.
Deliverables: Five sets of half-size (II "x 17`) 30 percent drawings, and five sets of 30 percent
specifications.
Subtask 2.6 - 30 Percent Design Workshop
A one -day workshop will be conducted after the City reviews the 30 percent design submittal. A
log of review comments will be maintained to ensure all design comments are incorporated.
Deliverables: Meeting agenda and minutes, action items, and review comments log.
TASK 3 - ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND PERMITTING
Subtask 3.1 - Progress Meetings and Public Hearings
This subtask includes up to six meetings with City staff and attendance at two public hearings. If
the need arises for additional meetings or the project schedule is extended beyond what is
originally anticipated due to changes in the project, HDR will only undertake additional services
upon receipt of authorization from the City.
Deliverables: Meeting agenda and minutes.
Subtask 3.2 - Existing Information Review
The HDR environmental team will collect and review available studies and previous
environmental documents for the area (including local land use plans), previously -prepared
project -specific supporting documentation (such as, but not limited to, any supporting
environmental documentation), the general plans, and general plan environmental impact report
(EIRs).
A field study will be conducted to analyze site-specific issues and environmental baseline
conditions. HDR will review existing information for the project site and determine the level of
additional technical studies needed for the environmental analysis.
Deliverables: List cf available information and field study notes.
08229 3/4/2009 A-8
Subtask 3.3 - Notice cf Preparation (NOP)
HDR will prepare a draft NOP for review and approval by City staff. Revisions will be made
based on City comments, and a final NOP will be submitted to the City for circulation to
interested parties and the State Clearinghouse.
Deliverables: NOP (10 copies and one CD with electronic files).
Subtask 3.4 - Public Scoping Meeting
The HDR environmental project manager and will attend one public scoping meeting for the
project. HDR will present pertinent environmental information and answer CEQA-related
questions. Information obtained at the scoping meeting will be considered in the preparation of
the EIR.
Deliverables: Meeting agenda and minutes.
Subtask 3.5 - Technical Studies
BioloLyical Resources
It is anticipated that, given the project's location and nature, as well as permit requirements, that
HDR team biologists will prepare a natural biological study that documents existing conditions,
provides habitat levels mapping, and identifies any special status species that could be affected
by the project. This technical study will be incorporated into the appropriate environmental
analysis section of the EIR, as well as support future permit applications.
Cultural Resources
As part of the Feasibility Evaluation for the Project, the HDR team archaeologists obtained a
search of the sacred lands file and a list of contacts among local -area Indians from the Native
American Heritage Commission, As part of this project, consultation letters will be sent to the
individuals and organizations listed by the Commission.
HDR team archaeologists will survey in detail the approximately 7 -acre surface water treatment
facility area (5 -meter transects) due to the nearby location of the recorded archaeological site
CA-SJo-36 and Woodbridge Cemetery. Any cultural resources identified will be mapped on a
7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle and project design drawings. Identified resources will also be
recorded on Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms. No excavation or significance
evaluations of identified resources will be conducted. This technical study will be incorporated
into the appropriate environmental analysis section of the EIR, as well as support future permit
applications.
08229 3/4/2009 A-9
Noise
The HDR team noise specialist sill conduct a field study that describe the existing noise
environment on the basis of short-term noise measurements (typically 5 to 10 minutes) at
representative receptors adjacent to the Project site and along the two pipeline routes. The field
study will also include 48- hour noise measurements at three locations in the project area to
estimate the existing CNEL and/or Ldn noise levels in the project area.
Deliverables: Technical memorandumfo reach technical area eve copies and one CD with
electronicfiles).
Subtask 3.6 - Administrative Draft EIR
HDR will prepare the Administrative Draft EIR based on the comments received on the NOP
and scoping process, technical information gathered during Subtask 3.2, and technical reports
prepared for the project. Upon completion of the review of supporting documentation and field
study, HDR will prepare the following components to be included in the Administrative Draft
EIR:
Project Description: The HDR project team will prepare a project description section based
on information to be provided by the project engineer and City staff, based primarily on the
Surface Water Treatment Facility Conceptual Design and Feasibility Evaluation (HDR, July
2008). The portion of the project description regarding project objectives and project history
will also be based on information obtained from previous documents and in cooperation with
City staff, Project elements will include raw water pipeline, pump station, water treatment
plant, park improvements, and treated water transmission pipeline. The project description
will include a discussion of park improvements.
• Setting: HDR will collect data and prepare setting sections for inclusion in the
Administrative Draft EIR. It is anticipated that the setting sections will rely on information
contained in previous studies, field work, and other published reports, and supplemented by
information obtained during site visits and during interviews with City staff.
• Significance Criteria: HDR will draft proposed significance criteria for each EIR topic for
review and comment with City staff, as part of the preparation of the Administrative Draft
EIR. This will result in consistent and appropriate application of impact thresholds and
mitigation requirements for all EIR topic areas.
• Impacts and Mitigation Measures: This section of the Administrative Draft EIR will
present an objective evaluation of the impacts of the proposed project. In addition, the
regulatory context and measures to mitigate adverse impacts will be identified.
• Alternatives: HDR will include analysis of the alternatives discussed in the Conceptual
Design and Feasibility Evaluation in the Administrative Draft EIR. It is anticipated that these
alternatives would include allo Project Alternative and the four alternatives discussed in the
Conceptual Design and Feasibility Evaluation, and will incorporate specific mitigation
measures or changes to the project that would reduce level of impacts.
08229 3/4/209 A-10
The Administrative Draft EIR will include a discussion of the environmental impacts
associated with each alternative, and compare the impacts with those identified for the
proposed project. In addition, a summary matrix that presents and contrasts the
environmental effects of each alternative, as compared to the proposed project, will be
prepared.
Statutory Sections: The Administrative Draft EIR also will include statutory sections
required by CEQA. Of importance for these sections is the analysis on growth inducement
associated with the proposed project and the cumulative impact analysis. The City's intent to
increase capacity will be viewed in the context of local general plans and the potential to be
viewed as growth -inducing. It is also anticipated that the cumulative impacts of additional
discharge of effluent will be a critical issue.
Deliverables: 10 copies and one unbound "camera ready "version o< an Administrative Draft
EIR for Citystaff review.
Subtask 3.7 - Draft EIR
Upon receipt of the City's comments on the Administrative Draft EIR, HDR will prepare a
Screen -check Draft EIR for final review by the City. Upon receipt of comments or approval of
the Screen -check Draft EIR, HDR will prepare the Draft EIR for public distribution. This subtask
assumes that the City will provide HDR with a single consolidated set of non -contradictory
comments for the Administrative and Screen -check Draft EIR. HDR will submit 25 copies, and
one unbound "camera ready" version of the Draft EIR and all appendices for public distribution
and review. Two electronic copies (including all exhibits and graphics) in PDF format of the
Draft EIR (appendices not included) will also be.provided to the City. If requested, HDR can
assist the City in the distribution of the Draft EIR.
Deliverables: One bound and one unbound copy Cf the Screen -check Draft EIR, and Draft EIR
(25 copies, one unbound "camera ready" copy, and two CDs with electronic
files).
Subtask 3.8 —Administrative Final EIR
Upon completion of the 45 -day Draft EIR public comment period, HDR will meet with the City
staff to discuss comment letters received on the Draft EIR and develop a strategy for responding
to those comments. Should the comments raise new issues not previously agreed upon in the
Draft EIR, HDR will work with City staff to resolve any out -of -scope issues. HDR will prepare
and submit ten copies and one unbound "camera ready" copy of an Administrative Final
EIR/Response to Comments to City staff for staff review.
Deliverables: Administrative Final EIR (10 copies and one unbound "camera ready" copy).
Task 3.9 — Final EIR
Upon receipt of City staff comments on the Administrative Final EIR, HDR will prepare a
Screen -check Final EIR for final review by the City. Upon receipt of comments or approval of
08229 3/4/2009 A-1 1
the Screen -check Final EIR, HDR will prepare the Final EIR/Response to Comments. This scope
assumes that the City will provide HDR with a single consolidated set of non -contradictory
comments for the Administrative and Screen -check Final EIR/Response to Comments. HDR will
submit 25 copies, and one unbound "camera ready" version of the Final EIR and all appendices
for public distribution and review. HDR will also submit two electronic copies (including all
exhibits and graphics) in PDF format of the Final EIR (appendices not included) to the City. If
requested, HDR can assist the City staff in the distribution of the Final EIR.
Deliverables: Screen -check Final EIR (one bound and one unbound copy) and Final EIR (25
copies, one unbound "camera ready "copy, and two CDs with electronicfiles).
Subtask 3.10 - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
HDR will prepare a MMRP in compliance with AB 3180. For any significant impact identified
in the EIR, the MMRP will describe the required mitigation and the tasks and schedule necessary
for monitoring mitigation compliance. The MMRP will generally identify the entity responsible
for each monitoring and reporting task. HDR will submit 10 copies and one unbound "camera
ready" copy of the draft MMRP to the City with the Administrative Final EIR for staff review
and distribution to the applicant's team. We will respond to City staff comments on the draft
MMRP and prepare a final MMRP for submission with the Final EIR.
Deliverables: MMRP (10 copies, unbound "cameraready" copy, and one CD with electronic
files).
Subtask 3.1 1— Findings
In coordination with City staff, HDR will produce a Statement of Findings and Overriding
Considerations that addresses the significant unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR (if
any). This document will demonstrate the relationship of the Final EIR to the project, and
mitigation measures to be considered by the City Board. The findings will conform to the
requirements of CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15091 and 15093.
Deliverables: Statement of Findings and Overriding Considerations (10 copies and one CD
with electronic files).
Subtask 3.12 — Coordination/Meetings with Other Agencies
Under this subtask, HDR will participate in meetings with City staff and other responsible
agencies (e.g., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] and California Department and Fish &
Game [CDFG]) regarding the EIR and permit requirements. This subtask assumes up to four
meetings. If requested, HDR will attend other meetings with interested agencies under the
direction of the City and submit an additional scope and fee for that work.
Deliverables: Meeting agenda and minutes.
08229 3/4/2009 A-12
Subtask 3.13 - Permitting Assistance (Optional)
HDR will be determine which local, state, and federal permits will be required for deign,
construction and operation of the proposed project, prepare the necessary permit applications,
and prepare/provide technical input to secure the permits. Our budget assumes that the following
federal, state, and local permits will be required for design, construction, and operation of the
facility. It is also assumed that there is no federal funding for the project and that no waters of the
U.S. will be impacted.
• San Joaquin Habitat Conservation Plan participation.
• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Order for Dewatering
and Other Low Threat Discharges to Surface Waters Permit.
• NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity.
• NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity.
• Domestic Water Supply Permit.
• Authority to Construct Permit.
• Authority to Operate Permit.
• Encroachment Permit.
• Crossing Permit.
• Building Department.
Deliverables: Technical informationforpermit applications.
08229 3/4/2009 A-13
EXIMIT B - ESTIMATED WORK EFFORT AND COST
City of Lodi
Surface Wafer TreatmentFacility and TransmissionProject (CEQA and Preliminary Design- Conventional Design -Bid -Build)
Task
No.
Task I
Task Description
I
- Project Management and • •
Principal/
QA/QC
••
Project Civil/ Arch Interior Struct Mach I Elect I Cost I
Manager Process Designer Engr Engr Engr I Est
Env I CADD I Admin/ I Total HDR I Total HDR I Total HDR I
Tech Clerical Labor Hourstabor ($) Expenses ($)
Subs
($)
Total
Cost ($)
1.1
lProiectManaqement
12
40 12
12 1 76 $15.6001 $ 1.600 $
3000 $
20200
12
IQA/QC Program
1 20
1 1 1
1 1 9 1 29 1 $5.5001 $ 6001 $
2.0001 $
8100
1 i 8 1
Subtotal Task 1
Percent .-
1 32
1 40 1 12 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1
1 1 - I 21 1 105 1$ 21.1001 $ 2.2001 $
5.0001 $
28.3001
1 21
Kick-off Meeting& Plant Site Visit
1 1 40 1
8 8 8 8
1 15 1 8 1 56 1 $7.9001 $ 8001 $
2.5001 $
11,20
1 2.2 JTopographicSiteSurvey
1 1 8 1
8 1 1 i i 1 1 1
1 16 1 8 1
40
1 $5.6001 $
6001 $
9o."I $
97.0001
1 2.3 IGeotechnicai Investigation
1 1 8 1
8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 8 1
24
1 $3.8001$
4001 S
17.2001 $
21.4001
1 2.4 1Corrosion Engineering
1 1 8 1
1 1 1 i 1 ( 1
1 i 8 1
16
1 $1,7001$
3001.$
39.1001 $
42.1001
1 2.5.11Design TMs
1 1 40 1
60 1 40 1 1 1 24 1 24 1
1 1 40 1
228
1 $34.3001$
3.5001$
17.0001 $
54,80d
1 2.5.2 130 Percent Specifications
1 15 1 8 1
52 1 37 1 4 1 36 1 16 1 45 1 1
1 1 40 1
252
1 $37.3001 $
3.8001 $
15.8001 $
56.9001
1 2.5.2 130 Percent Drawings
1 62 1 31
1 208 1 147 1 18 1 18 1 63 1 179 1 40 1
1 946 1 8 1
1.719
1 $226.2001$
22.7001 $
49.0001 $
297.900I
1 2.6 130 PercentDesign Workshop
1 8 1 12
1 12 1 8 1 8
1 8 1
56
1 $9. mm $
1.0001 $
2.0001 $
12.6001
Subtotal Task 2
1 85 1 123
1 356 1 240 1 22 1 53 1 103 1 263 1 40
978 1 128 1
2.391
1 S 327.4001 S
33.1001 S
233.4001 S
593.900
I 31(Progress Meetings (up to6)and Public Hearings (up to2) I I 10 I 20 I I I
I I I I 80 1 I 10 I 120 i $20.4001$
2,1001
I$
22,5001
1 3.2 1Existing Information Review 1 1 1 i 1 1
1 1 I 1 20 1 1 20 I 53,6001$
4001
1$
4,0001
1 3.3 INOP 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 40 1 40 80 I $10,3001 S
1,100 1
1$
11,4001
1 3.4 1 Public Scoping Meeting
24 1 1 16 1 40 1 $5,6001 $
6001
13
6,20d
3.5 Technical Studies
112
30
142
$22.401 $
2,30 $
24,324 $
49,02
3.6 Administrative Drafl EIR
214
60
274
$43,00)$
4,30
$
47,30
3.7 Draft EIR
68
16
84
$13. $
1,400
$
14,900
3.8 Administrative Final EIR
106
22
128
$20,70)S
2,100
$
22,80
3.9 Final EIR
22
10
32
$4,80 $
500
$
5,300
3.10 MMRP
30
4
34
$5.70 $
600
$
6,30
3.11 Findinqs
54
4
58
$10,0001 $
1,000
$
11.000:
1 3.12 Coordination/Meetings with OtherAsencies Sup to 41
22 1
1 1
22
1 $4,0001$
400
1 $
4,4001
3.13 PermittingAssistance(Optional) 16 37
100
1 9 1
162
1 $27,80 $
2,800
$
30,60
Subtotal Task 3 - 26 5-1 - - - -
COLUMN TOTALS 117 189 426 240
1 22 53 103 263
- - 892
40 892 978
1 221 1
1 370 1
1,196
3.692
1 $ 191,800 $
1 $540.3001
19,6001$
$54,9001
24,324 $
$262,7241
235,724
$857.924'
i
08229 31412009 HDR Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT B-1
PRELIM INARY LISTING OF DRAWINGS
City of Lodi
Surface Water Treatment Facility and Transmission Project
CEQA and Preliminary Design - Conventional Design -Bid -Build
08229 3/4/2009 Page 1 of 12
Drawing D- 0%
1
G1
Cover Sheet
X
2
G2
Symbols and Abbreviations I
X
3
G3
Symbols and Abbreviations II
X
4
G4
General Notes I
5
G5
General Notes II
6
G6
Water Treatment Plant Process Flow Schematic and Design Criteria I X
7
G7 Water Treatment Plant Process Flow Schematic and Design Criteria II X
8 Q8 lHvdrauloc Profile x
Civil C
9 C1
Key Plan
X
10 C2
Raw Water Pump Station Grading and Paving Plan
X
11 C3
Raw Water Pump Station Piping Plan
X
12 C4 Water Treatment Plant Grading & Paving Plan I
X
13 C5 JWater Treatment Plant Grading & Paving Plan II
X
14 C6
Water Treatment Plant Process Piping Plan I
5
C7
Water Treatment Plant Process Piping Plan 11
C8
Water Treatment Plant Chemical and Sample Piping Plan
� X
C9
C10
C11
Raw Water Pipeline Profile STA 0+00 - 05+00
X
Raw Water Pipeline Profile STA 0+50 - 10+00
X
Raw Water Pioeline Profile STA 10+00 -15+00
X
C12
Raw Water Pipeline Profile STA 15+00 -19+50
X
C13
Miscellaneous Pipeline Profiles 1
22 C14
Miscellaneous Pioeline Profiles II
23 C15
Distribution Pipeline Profile STA 0+00 - 05+00
X
24 C16
Distribution Pipeline Profile STA 05+00 -10+00
X
25 C17
Distribution PioelineProfile STA 10+00 -15+00 I X
26 C18
Distribution Pipeline Profile STA 15+00 - 20+00
X
27 C19
Distribution Pipeline Profile STA 20+00 - 25+00
X
28 C20
Well Site 3R Piping Improvements
X
08229 3/4/2009 Page 1 of 12
ZL }o Z abed 6002/t,/E 6ZZ90
X
ueld Jolen913 pue a!elS/Aggo-1 pe6jelug 6u!pl!ng suo!jeaado/aueagwaW
9Z`d
99
X
veld wool aalloo-1 pe6aelu3 6u!ppg suo!leaado/oueagwaW
9Zd
179
X
ueld Ajoleaoge-1 pa6jelug 6u!pl!ng suolleaado/auejgwaW
1,Zd
£9
X
ueld ysluld ao!aa}ul bulppe suollejado/auejgwaW
EZbr
Z9
X
III suolloaS IIeM 6ulpl!ng suolleaado/ausigwaW
ZZ`d
1,9
II suolloaS IIeM 6u!pl!ng suolleaado/ampIwaW
LZH
09
1 suo!loaS IIeM 6u!pl!ng suo!leaado/aumgwaW
OZH
69
X
II suolloaS 6u!plmg suo!jeaado/aueagwaW
61V
99
X
1 suolloaS 6ulppEl suollejado/auejgwaW
9I,V
LS
X
11 suo!len913 J0119}x3 6ulpling suolleaado/eueagwaW
L I V
99
X
I I SU011en913 Mla9lx3 6ulppq suolleaado/aueagwaW
91,y
99
ueld 100Z1 6ulppEl suolleaado/aueagwaW
gl,y
t,g
Mid 6u!l!90 p91091191:1 6ulplmg suollejado/auejgwaW
t I;V
£g
X
ueld Joold puooaS 6ulpyng suo!leaado/auejgwaW
£Lbs
Z9
X
11 ueld Joold lsa!d 6u!plmg suo!jeaado/aueagwaW
Zbd
L9
X
I ueld Joold }sJ!3 6ulpling suo!lejado/aueigwaW
L Ly
09
lxal ueld apoo 6u!pl!ng suolleaado/aueagwaW
OLH
6t,
joold puooaS ueld apoo 6ulppEl suolleaado/auejgwaW
6y
gt,
Goold }saki ueld apoo 6ulppg suollejado/auejgwaW
9y
Lt,
suolloaS 6u!ppg uogelS dwnd a918M m8N
LV
9t,
X
II suogena13 uo!lelS dwnd JaleM MB8
9d
9117
X
I suo!len913 uo!lelS dwnd jaleM meal
gy
t,t,
ueld 100Z1 uollelS dwnd aaleM Me?J
t,d
£t,
X
ueld zooid uollelS dwnd JaleM meal
Ed
Zt,
Mid apoo uollelS dwnd J918M N1eN
Zt/
Lt,
Mid apoo a1►S uo!lelS dwnd jaleM meN
Lt/
0t,
Al spelao I!n!o
L£o
6E
III SHOW] PID
0£0
9E
11 spelea I!n!o
6Z0
LE
I sl!elaa I!n!o
9ZO
9£
II simea 6ullauunl adld
LZO
9E
I sllelao 6ullauunl adld
9Z0
t,E
X
sluewanoidwl Buldld 9Z al!S IIaM
9Z0
EE
X
sluawanadwl 6uldld LL al!S IIaM
VZ0
Z£
X
sluawanoidwl 6u!d!d t,4 al!S IIaM
EZ0
L£
X
slueweAoidwl 6u!d!d 6 al!S IIaM
ZZ0
OE
X
sluawanoadwl 6uldld H9 al!S IIGMI
LZO
6Z
08229 3/4/2009 Page 3 of 12
,
No.
isheet .Drawing
i
Membrane/Operations Building Interior Elevations I
66
A27
67
A28
Membrane/Operations Building Interior Elevations II
68
A29
Membrane/Operations Building Interior Elevations II I
69
A30
Membrane/Operations Building Interior Elevations VI
70
A31 Membrane/Operations Building Interior ElevationsV
71
A32
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Code Plan
72
A33
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Code Plan Text
73
A34
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Floor Plan
X
74
A35
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Reflected Ceiling Plan
75
A36
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Roof Plan
76
A37
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Exterior Elevations I
X
77
A38
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Exterior Elevations 11
X
78
A39
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Sections
79
A40
Finish Schedule
80
A41
Wall Types/Schedule
81
A42
Door Schedule
82
A43 Door Types
83
A44 lWindow
and Louver Schedule
84
A45
Window and Louver Types
85
A46 Equipment Schedule
86
A47 IDetails
1
87
A48 I
Details II
88
A49
Details III
89
A50
Details IV
90
A51
Details V
91
A52
Details VI
92
A53
Details VII
93
A54
Details VI II
94
A55
Details IV
95
A56
Details X
96
A57
Details XI
k
1 98 1
A58
L1 JPlantinq
DetailsXll
Plans I
X
99 1
L2 IPlanting
Plans II
X
100
U
Irrigation Plans
101
1
IA
Irrigation Plans II
102
L5
Landscape Details
08229 3/4/2009 Page 3 of 12
ZL Jo }, abed 6002/t7/£ 6ZZ80
III sllelaa pue suolloaS 6uippq suolleaadO
9£S
6£ L
II sllelaa pue suolloaS 6ulplmg suol;eladO
5£S
est.
I slle;ad pue suolloaS 6ulplmg suolleaadO
t7£S
LCI.
II Ueld 6ulwead;oo�j 6ulpling suol;e eclo
££S
9£L
I ueld 6uiwead jooa 6ulpling suol;ejad0
Z£S
9£L
If ueld 6uluaejd aoold puooaS bulpimg suol;eaad0
LES
t7£I,
I ueld buluaejd aoold puooaS 6ulpling suol;eaadO
0£S
££L
II ueid Goold punoaO bulpling suol;ejadO
US
Z£L
I Ueld mold punoaa bulplmg suolleaadO
9ZS
LEI,
11 ueld uollepunod bulplmg suolleaadO
LZS
0£L
I Ueld uollepunod 6ulplmg suol;ejadO
9ZS
6ZL
Ili sllelaa g suogoaS uiseg uogeln000ld ig IpE)
9ZS
9ZL
II sllelaa V suolloaS ulseg uolleln000ld'g IpE)
17ZS
LZL
I sllelaa 'S suolloaS ulseg uol;eln000ld 18 IpE)
£ZS
9ZL
ueld uollepunod ulseg uolleln000ld'8 IpE)
ZZS
523
II sllelaa 18 suolloaS uollelS dwnd JaleM Melt
LZS
t7Z4
I sllelaa 3g suogoaS uogelS dwnd ja;eM maN
OZS
CZ!,
suolloaS bu►pling uolle;S dwnd JaleM N1e�!
61.S
ZZL
suolloaS 6ulplmg uollelS dwnd aa;eM me;_l
9LS
21,
ueld J000 l uollelS dwnd jaleM Mejl
LLS
OZL
ueld aoold punojOluollepunod uollelS dwnd JaleM meal
9LS
61,1,
sllelaa pg suogoaS opeab-uo-gels snoauelleos!W
9LS
91,1,
sueld apea6-uo-gelS snoeuellaoslW
bLS
LLL
sllelaa 6ulle.iO piepuelS
£LS
91,4
II sllelaa 6ullpe l piepuelS
US
544
I sllelaa bullpjq piepue;S
LLS
t4l,
sllelaa laa;S paepuelS
0 LS
£ L L
sllelaa doll lelaW piepuelS
6S
U 1.
X
sllelaa laalS 6u1ojo;ulaH paepuelS
89
L L L
II sllelad hull ,Guosew a;aaouoa plepuelS
LS
0 L L
X
I slle;aa;lun tiuoseyv aienuoa piepuelS
9S
60L
Al sllelaa alaaouoO piepuelS
99
90L
III slle;aa alaiouoa piepuelS
t7S
L01,
II sllelaa a;a.iouoa paepuelS
£S
90L
1 sllelaa alaiouoa paepuelS
ZS
90L
X
saloN leinlonalS lejaua0
LS
bol.
OR
sllelaa uolleBuil 91 £01,
08229 3/4/2009 Page 5 of 12
D- 0%
Operations Building Sections and Details IV
No.
140
ISheet .Drawing
S37
141
S38 Operations BuildinD Partial Framinj@ Plans and Details I
142
S39 Operations Building Partial Framing Plans and Details II
143
S40 Operations Building Sections and Details I
144
S41
Operations Building Sections and Details 11
145
S42
Operations Building Sections and Details III
146
S43
Operations Building Sections and Details IV
1147
S44 Operations Building Sections and Details V
148
S45
Backwash Tank and Treatment System Foundation Plan
149
S46
Backwash Tank and Treatment System Section & Details
150
S47
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Foundation/Ground Floor Plan
151
S48
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Roof Framing Plan
152
S49
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Sections 1
153
S50
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Sections II
154
S51
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Sections and Details
155
S52
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Sections and Details 11
156
S53 High Service Pump/Chemical Building Sections and Details III
157
S54 (Treated Water Storage Tank Ring Foundation Plan
158
S55 Treated Water Storage Tank Sections and Details
159
S56 Treated Water Storage Tank Sections and Details 11
150
S57 (Mis-cellaneousPipe Support Details I
161
S58 Miscellaneous Pipe Support Details I I
162
S59 Microfiltration System Miscellaneous Details
163
P1
Raw Water Pump Station Plan
X
164
P2 Raw Water Pump Station Sections and Details 1
165
P3 tRaw
Water Pump Station Sections and Details II
166
P4
Membrane Piping Plan
P5
Membrane Piping Sections and Details I
P6 jMembrane
Piping Sections and Details II
Pall Corp •ation
166
P7
Layout Plan
X
167
P8
Layout Sections and Details
168
P9
Layout Sections 1
169
P10
Layout Sections 11
170
P11
P&ID Legends and Abbreviations
171
P12
P&ID Overall Membrane Filtration System
X
172
P13
P&ID Primary Filtration System
08229 3/4/2009 Page 5 of 12
08229 3/4/2009 Page 6 of 12
Drawing Description
P&ID Clean-In-Place System
0'
No. Isheet Nol
173 P14
174
P15
P&ID Process Control and Air Scour System
175
P16
P&ID Backwash Recovery System
176
P17
P&ID Neutralization Svstem
Siemens/fAemcor
177
P18
Layout Plan
X
178
P19
Layout Sections and Details
179
P20
Layout Sections I
180
P21
Layout Sections 11
181
P22
IP&ID Legends and Abbreviations
X
182
P23
P&ID Overall Membrane Filtration System
X
183
P24 P&ID Primary Filtration System
184
P25
P&ID Clean-In-Place System
185
P26
P&ID Process Control and Air Scour System
186
P27
P&ID Backwash Recovery System
187
P28
P&ID Neutralization System
X
188
P29
Backwash Tank Plan and Elevation
X
189
P30
Backwash Tank Details 1
190
P31
Backwash Tank Details I I
191
P32 Backwash Reclaim Pump Station Plan
X
192
P33 Backwash Reclaim Pump Station Details
193
P34
Treated Water Tank Plan and Sections
X
194
P35 Treated Water Storage Tank Details 1
195
P36
Treated Water Storage Tank Details II
196 1
P37
Treated Water Storage Tank Baffles
197
P38 High Service & Backwash Pumping Station Plan
198
P39
High Service & Backwash Pumping Station Sections and Details I
199
1P41
P40
High Service & Backwash Pumping Station Sections and Details 11
200
Screw Press Plan
X
201
P42
Screw Press Sections 1
202
P43
Screw Press Sections 11
203
P44
Screw Press Details 1
204
P45
Screw Press Details II
205
P46
Air Compressor Room Plan
X
206
P47
Air Comeressor Room Sections & Details
F-Yo
P48
Chemical Systems Area Plan I
X
P49
Chemical Systems Area Plan II
X
08229 3/4/2009 Page 6 of 12
08229
•Isheet
209
•
P50
i • i- • •
Chemical Systems Area Plan III
1'.
X
210
1 P51
Chemical System Sections and Details I
211
P52
jChemiral System Sections and Details II
212
P53
Chemical System Sections and Details III
213
P54
Polymer System Plan and Sections
214
P55
Flocculation Basin Plan
X
215
P56
Flocculation Basin Sections
216
P57
Flocculation Basin Details
217
P58
Plats Sattler PJen
X
218
P59
Plate Settler Sections
219
P60
CIP Tank Plan and Sections
X
220
P61
Soda Ash Silo Plan and Sections
221
P62
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 1
X
222
P63
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 2
223
1 P64
lWell Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 3
224
P65
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 4
225
P66
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 5
226
P67
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 6
227
P68
Well Site Chemical Svstem Plan and Sections 7
228
P69
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 8
229
P70
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 9
230
P71
Well Site Chemical Svstem Plan and Sections 10
231
P72
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 11
232
P73
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 12
233
P74
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 13
234
P75
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 14
235
P76
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 15
236
P77
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 16
237
P78
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 17
238
P79
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 18
239
P80 7.Well
Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 19
240
P81
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 20
241
P82
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 21
242
P83
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 22
243
P84
WeII Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 23
244
P85
Well Site Chemical System Plan and Sections 24
221
P62
Piping Support Details
222
P63
Piping Details I
08229
No. ISheet . Drawing Description ,
223 P64 Piping Details II
224
I P65
Piping Details III
Allec ca/ All
225
M I
Energy Compliance Forms 1
226
M2
Energy Compliance Forms II
227
M3
Mechanical Symbols
X
228
M4
Raw Water Pump Station HVAC Plan
229
M5
Raw Water Pump Station HVAC Sections
230
M6
Raw Water Pump Station Plumbing Plan
231
M7
Raw Water Pump Station Water & Waste Isometrics
232
M8
Operations Building 1 st Floor HVAC Plan 1
233
M9
Operations Building 1 st Floor HVAC Plan II
234
M10
Operations Building 2nd Floor HVAC Plan I
235
M11
Operations Building HVAC Roof Plan 1
236
M12
Operations Building HVAC Roof Plan II
237
M13
Operations Building HVAC Sections 1
238
M14
Operations Buildinga HVAC Sections II
239
M15
Operations Building Enlarged Mechanical Room Plan
240
M16
Operations Building Temperature Control Diagrams
241
M17
Operations BuildingaAirflow Schematics
242
M18
Operations Building 1 st Floor Plumbing Plan 1
243
M 19 Operations Building 1st Floor Plumbing Plan If
244
M20
Operations Building 2nd Floor Plumbing Plan 1
245
M21 Operations Building Water Isometrics
246
M22 Operations Building Waste Isometrics
247
M23
Operations Buildirga Hot Water Loop Schematic
248
M24
Operations Building Chilled Water Loop Schematic
249
M25 High Service Pump/Chemical Building HVAC Plan I
250
M26 I Hiah Service Puma/Chemical Buildina HVAC Plan II
251
M27
High Service Pump/Chemical Building HVAC Roof Plan 1
252
M28
High Service Pump/Chemical Building HVAC Roof Plan II
253
M29
Hiah Service Pump/Chemical Buildina Plumbina Plan 1
254
M30
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Plumbing Plan II
255
M31
High Service Pump/Chemical Building HVAC Sections 1
256
M32
Hiah Service Pump/Chemical Buildina HVAC Sections 11
257
M33
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Temperature Control Diagrams
258
M34
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Airflow Schematics
259
M35
High Service Pump/Chemical Building Water Isometrics
08229 3/4/2009 Page 8 of 12
08229 3/4/2009 Page 9 of 12
No.
iSbeet No) Drawing Description 0',
M36 High Service Pump/Chemical Building Waste Isometrics
260
261
M37
Mechanical Details I
262
M38
Mechanical Details II
263
M39
Mechanical Details III
264
E I
Electrical Symbols, Abbreviations, and Notes
X
265
E2
Title 24 Sheet
266
E3 Raw Water Pump Station Site Plan
X
267
E4
Raw Water Pump Station Power Plan
268
E5 Raw Water Pump Station Lighting Plan
269
E6
Raw Water Pump Station GroundirLa Plan
270
E7
Raw Water Pump Station Single -line Diagram
X
271
E8
Operations Building Electrical Single -Line Diagram- Main Switchboard
X
272
E9
Operations Building Electrical Single -Line Diagram - MCC 1
273
E10
Operations Building Electrical Single -Line Diagram - MCC 11
274
Ell
Operations Building Electrical 1st Floor Lighting Plan
275
E12
Operations Building Electrical 2nd Floor Lighting Plan
276
E13
Operations Building Electrical 1 st Floor Power Plan 1
277
E14
Operations Building Electrical 1 st Floor Power Plan II
278
E15
Operations Building Electrical 2nd Floor Power Plan
279
E16
Operations Building Electrical Roof Power Plan
280
E17
Operations Building Electrical Roof Power Plan
281 1
E18 10perations
Building Electrical Room Plan
282 1
Pall Corporation
283 !
E19 10perations
E20
Building Electrical Grounding Plan
Single -Line Diagrams X
284
1
E21
Schedules
285
E22
Control Wiring Block Diagram
286
E23
Power Plan
US Filter/Memcor
287 E24 ]Single -Line Diagrams X
288 1 E25 ISchedules
289
E26
Control Wiring Block Diagram
290
E27
Power Plan
291
E28
Water Treatment Plant Electrical Site Plan - Power& Lighting I
X
292
E29
Water Treatment Plant Electrical Site Plan- Power& Lighting 11
X
293
E30 Water Treatment Plant Operations Building Elevator Plan
08229 3/4/2009 Page 9 of 12
Z 6 ;0 01 a0ad 6002 WE 6ZZ20
06 l04uo0 pus usid 911S 119M
893
6E£
6 104u00 pus usid 911S IIaM
L93
0££
8 f04uo0 pus usid 91!S IIaM
993
ME
L 104u00 pus u81d a1lS IIaM
993
8Z£
9 IorluoD pus usid 91!S 119M
b93
LZ£
9 104U0 pus usid 911S IIaM
E99
9Z£
b f04u00 pus usid 911S IIaM
Z93
9Z£
£ 10rlu00 pus usid 91!S 119M
693
bZS
Z 104u00 pus usid a11S IIaM
093
£ZE
X
6 104u00 pus usid 9118 IIaM
693
ZZE
Mid 6u!punorE) Bulpf!n81soiwego/durnd GOINGS 46tH
993
LZ£
usid uaooN 1801r1oa13 Bu!p11n8 16*oluaa4o/dwnd GOINGS 46iH
1-99
OZE
usid Bu11461-I Bulppne Isojw9go/dwnd aolnraS 461H
953
66£
usid Bu11461-1 Bulplln8 Isoiwego/dwnd aolnraS 46IH
993
86E
II usid rannod Bulpl!n81soiwego/dwnd aolnaaS 46iH
b53
L6£
I usid rannod Bulplln8 Isoiw9go/dwnd aolnraS 4611-1
E53
96£
Mid rannod Must aBsrolS r918M palsar,l
Z93
5 6£
usid rannod ralllaS alsld
L93
b6E
usld rannod ulss8 uollsln000id
093
£6E
usld rannod Musl 498m)1388 pus uo11s1S dwnd Uulslo921
6b3
Z6£
Al alnpa4oS }lnpuoo pus }lnpuoo }usid lu9wlsarl raleM
8tr3
6 6£
III alnpa4oS }lnpuoo pus }lnpuoC) lusld lu9wle9rl r918M
Lb3
OLE
II alnpa43S llnpuoo pus }lnpuoo lusld lu9wls9r., ralsM
9b3
60£
1 elnpa43S }lnpuoo pus }lnpuoo }usid luau118811 r918M
GIG
80£
II salnpe4oS IeolrloG13 lus1d luaualsarl raleM
b73
LOS
I salnpa4oS leolrlo913 }usid lu9wls9rl r918M
EVE]
90E
usid uaooN I04u00
Zb3
Me
elnpa4oS arn}xld
6bE]
b0£
II selnpa4oS lausd
Obi
EO£
I salnpa4oS 19usd
6EE]
WE
A olleuaa4oS 1Q1uo3
8£3
60£
In 04suaa4oS 104u00
LEE]
00£
III 0148WO40S l04u00
9EE]
66Z
11 34suaa4oS I04u00
5£3
96Z
I 011BLU940S l04u00
b£3
L6Z
aBsrolS land rolsrauaE) AousBiewa
E£3
96Z
sl!slap pus suolloeS rolsraua!D AouaBiawg
Z£3
96Z
Mid rolerauaE) AOu96r8ua3 6£3 b6Z
.a 6uimej(] [ON 190LISI 'ON
08229 3/4/2009 Page 11 of 12
No. ISheet Nol
332 E69
Drawing Description 30%
Well Site Plan and Control 11
333
E70
Well Site Plan and Control 12
334
E71
Well Site Plan and Control 13
335
E72
Well Site Plan and Control 14
336
E73
Well Site Plan and Control 15
337
E74
Well Site Plan and Control 16
338
E75
Well Site Plan and Control 17
339
E76
Well Site Plan and Control 18
340
E77
Well Site Plan and Control 19
341
E78
Well Site Plan and Control 20
342
E79
lWell Site Plan and Control 21
343
E80
Well Site Plan and Control 22
344
E81
Well Site Plan and Control 23
345
E82
Well Site Plan and Control 24
346
E83
Electrical Details 1
347
E84
Electrical Details
348
E85 Electrical Details III
349
( E86 Communications Plan
Instrumentation 1
350
11
Instrumentation Abbreviations and Symbols
X
351 j
12
Raw Water Pump Station Process& Instrumentation Dia-aram
X
352
13 Water Treatment Plant PLC Layout & Communication Diagram
X
353
14 AutostrainerProcess& Instrumentation Diagram
X
1 354 1
15 (Membrane
Svstem Process & Instrumentation Diaaram
X
355
16
Membrane Analysis Process & Instrumentation Diagram
X
356
17
Screw Press Process & Instrumentation Diagram
X
357
18
Screw Convevor Process & Instrumentation Diaaram (
X
358
19
Sludge Pump Process& Instrumentation Diagram
X
359
110
Storage Tank Process & Instrumentation Diagram
X
360
111
Chemical Systems Process & Instrumentation Diagram I
X
361
112
Chemical Systems Process & Instrumentation Diagram II
X
362
113
Chemical Systems Process & Instrumentation Diagram Ili
X
363
114
Chemical Svstems Process & Instrumentation Diaaram IV
X
364
115
Chemical Systems Process & Instrumentation Diagram V
X
365
116
Polymer System Process& Instrumentation Diagram
X
366
117
Soften Water Process& Instrumentation Diagram
X
367 1
118
Generator Process & Instrumentation Diagram
X
368
119
Well Site Process & Instrumentation Diagram
X
08229 3/4/2009 Page 11 of 12
No. ISheet No] Drawing Description 30%
369 120 Main Control Panel MCP Elevation
370
121
Main Control Panel Panelboard Layout
371
122
High Service Pump Station PLC Layout& Communication Diagram
372
123
Raw Water Pump Station PLC Lavout& Communication Diagram
373
124
Instrumentation Details 1
374
125
Instrumentation Details 11
375
126
Instrumentation Details III
Optional
Typical Loop and Interconnection Wiring Diagram
Optional
Main Control Panel Wii ing Diagram I
Optional Main Control Panel Wiring Diagram 11
Optional
Main Control Panel Wiring Diagram III
Optional
Main Control Panel Wiring Diagram IV
Optional
Main Control Panel Wiring Diagram V
Optional
Main Control Panel Wiring Diagram Vi
08229 3/4/2009 Page 12 of 12
KHIBIT C - PROJECT SCHEDULE
skName
Start
Finish_ Feb'09
Mar'09_,__Apr'CT— __._Mai'09Jun'09Jul'094
Aug;09
Oct'09Nov'09 __Dec_09__ Jan'10__
nsultant Notice to Proceed
3/25/09
3/25/09
♦,3/25
% DESIGN
3/26/09
6129109
Kick-off Meeting/ Site Visit
3/26/09
3/26/09
3/26
Topographic Site Survey
3/27/09
4/9/09
Geotechnical Report
3/27/09
5/21/09
Draft GeotechnicalReport
3/27/09
5/7/09
Review Period
5/8/09
5/14/09
1,
Final Geotechnical Report
5/15/09
5/21/09
11b
Corrosion Engineering
3/27/09
4/23/09
30% Design Submittal
3/27/09
6/15/09
Review Period
6/16/09
6/26/09
30% Design Workshop
6/29/09
6/29/09
6/29
WIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND
5/8/09
1217/09
ARMITTING
Noticeof Preparation (NOP)
5/8/09
5/14/09
Public Review Period
5/15/09
6/15/09
Public Scoping Meeting
6/5/09
6/5/09
♦ 6!5
Technical Studies
5/18/09
7/6/09
AdministrativeDraft EIR
6/16/09
8/17/09
ReviewPertod
8/18/09
8/31/09
Public Draft EIR
9/1/09
9/14/09
Public Review Period
9/15/09
10/15/09
AdministrativeFinal EIR
10/16/09
10/29/09
Review Period
Final EIR
10/30/09
11/13/09
11/12/09
11/26/09
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
11113/09
11/26/09
Findings
11/27/09
12/7/09
Coordination/Meetings with OtherAgencies
11/10/09
12/7/09
Permitting
11/10109
12/7/09
:ity of Lodi
Task
Milestone ♦ Summary
Meetings A Review Period O
Surface Water Treatment Facility and Transmission
Project
:EOA and Preliminary Design - Conventional Design-Bid-Build
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
STANDARDRATESCHEDULE
January to December 2009
City of Lodi
Surface Water Treatment Facility and Transmission Project
Project Principal
$295
Senior Financial Specialist
259
Senior Project Manager/ Project Controls
251
Senior Project Engineer
243
Technical Specialist II
240
Senior Electrical Engineer/ Senior Geotechnical Engineer
231
Construction Specialist
225
Technical Specialist 1
221
Senior Cost Estimating Specialist
218
Senior Structural Engineer
210
Electrical EngineerlV
203
Project Manager/ Geotechnical Engineer
194
Mechanical Engineerll / Environmental Specialist
180
Operations Specialist/ Interior Designer
174
Modeler
172
Design -Build Specialist
168
Electrical Engineer III / Process Engineer
162
Project Engineerll / CADD Manager/ Architect II
151
Architect I/ Project Engineer II
145
Electrical Engineer ll / Mechanical Engineer 1
143
Planner
140
Project Engineer I / CADD Designer/ Project Controller 111
137
Civil Engineer
131
Senior CAD Technician
129
Staff Engineer II / CAD Technician III
119
Project Controller 11
117
Project Controller 1
115
Staff Engineer I/ CAD Technician II
114
Structural Engineer/ Accountant/ Cost Estimator
111
CAD Technician 1
109
Electrical Engineer 1
102
Senior Administrative
99
Engineer -in -Training
96
Drafter III/Administrative/Word Processor
88
Drafter I I
84
Drafter I/Technical Editor/ Project Coordinator 11
74
Project Coordinator 1
70
Clerical II
66
Clerical 1
52
Please Note: Rates include current overhead rate plus profit and are adjusted annually.
EXPENSES
In -House Expenses
Technology Charge per Direct Labor Hour $3.70
Vehicle Mileage (per mile) $0.55
Color Copy (per copy) $0.75 to $1.50
Photocopies (per copy) $0.10 to $0.20
Bond Plotting - Black & White (per square foot)
Bond Plotting - Color (per square foot)
Vellum - Black &White (per square foot)
Mylar - Black & White (per square foot)
$0.135
$0.50
$0.50
$0.90
Please Note: Technology charges include computer, CADD, network, software, and other related technology
services. Expenses and subconsultants are charged with a 10 percent markup.
Exhibit B
SECOND AMENDMENT TO 2003 AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF WATER
FROM WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT BY CITY OF LODI,
TO PERMIT LQDI TO SELL PORTION OF ITS BANKED WATER
This agreement is entered into between the City of Lodi (City) and the
Woodbridge Irrigation District (District) this day of ,2009.
Recitals
A. On May 13,2003, City entered into a 40 -year Agreement with District for the
City's purchase of water from District entitled "Agreement for Purchase of Water from
the Woodbridge Irrigation District by the City of Lodi" (and hereinafter referred to as the
2003 Agreement). The Agreement provided for the City's purchase of a base supply of
6,000 acre-feet per annum (plus additional amounts on specified conditions), for a
payment commencing at $200 per acre-foot or $1,200,000 annually for the base supply,
subject to later annual price adjustments, the water to be delivered to City from March 1
through October 15. Under the Agreement, the water must be used within City's service
area, and City can not assign or transfer the right to the water without the consent of the
District.
B. The 2003 Agreement provides for annual payments to District whether or not the
water is used by City. Payments of $300,000 quarterly by Cityto District under the
Agreement commenced on October 1, 2003. The water must be treated. Plans for
treatment and use of the water from the District have been delayed. City is preparing to
enter a contract with thefirm of HDR, Inc. in an amount of $2.9 million dollars for the
complete design, to a level ready for bidding of construction, of new treatment plant
works, which would treatthe water delivered by District for use by the City customers.
No District water has been taken or used to date by the City under the 2003 Agreement.
C, Paragraph 8 of the 2003, Agreement provides that City can carry over and have
credit for unused water during the initial three years, of up to 18,000 acre-feet, referred to
as "banked water" in the Agreement, for later delivery to City in subsequent years in
which District has water available for such deliveries.
D. On January 17, 2008, the parties entered into a First Amendment to the 2003
Agreement, which, among other things, extended the 40 -year term of the 2003
Agreement, an additional four years and five months, and which also extended City's
right to carry over and bank an additional 24,000 acre-feet of water that was unused by
the City up to October 15, 2010, thus giving City a right to bank a combined total of
42,000 acre-feet.
E. This Second Amendment to the 2003 Agreement is intended to provide
District's consent to City, working with the District's Manager, to pursue agreements to
sell up to 18,000 acre-feet of its first three years of banked water to others.
NOW, THEREFORE, WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND
THE CITY OF LODI AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. City may pursue, working with the District's Manager, a sale agreement or
agreements with others for their purchase during the years 2009, 2010 and 2011, of up to
6,000 acre-feet of water per year banked by the City, for a total of 18,000 acre-feet of
banked water if 1) in the year of sale District's Regulated Base Supply entitlement under
District's Agreement with EBMUD is a full 60,000 acre-feet, and if 2) the District is able
to make the water to be transferred available from its Regulated Base Supply for delivery
in the year of sale, as solely determined by District.. Any resulting agreement shall be
subject to the District's approval and the District shall be a party; If District's Regulated
Base Supply is less than 60,000 acre-feet in any such year, City may pursue the sale of
not more than one-half of 6,000 acre-feet in such year subject to the same terms and
conditions of availability. District will be unable to finally determine,whether District's
Regulated Base Supply is less than 60,000 acre-feet until.July 1 of each year. District
shall have no responsibility or obligation to City if District cannot or does not make such
water available for transfer, or if any such transfer fails for; any reason beyond the control
of District. However, City will retain its banked water rightscif the transfer does fail.
2. The sale price payable to Lodi shall be not less than $200 per acre-foot, plus in
year 2011 the inflator factor which commences in that year in, the 2003 Agreement. City
shall pay to District (in advance if requested by District), all costs and expenses (legal,
engineering or otherwise), incurred or estimated by District be incurred, in assisting
and/or implementing the sale by City.
3. District shall not be obligated to approve any sales that impose or potentially
impose any conditions upon District's water rights or requirements upon District that are
unsatisfactory to District.
4. City agrees that the City's proceeds of any such sale shall be used solely for
the planning, design and/or, construction of its planned treatment plant facilities or to
reimburse -'other City funds used for such purposes.
5. City acknowledges the value and benefit to it of the District approving such
sales of water by the City pursuant to this Agreement, in that District itself could
undertake for its own benefit to sell directly any surplus water it may have available
during the next three years. Nothing herein shall prevent or preclude District also selling
any surplus water that it has available in any such year above the amount sold by City, or
from selling any surplus District water if City fails to sell such water, or if City sells less
than 6,000 acre-feet, from selling any surplus water above the amount of water sold by
City.
6. This Agreement does not authorize or establish a precedent for District's
approval of any future sale by City of any banked water it may have under its 2003
Agreement with District, either beyond year 2011 or beyond 18,000 acre-feet, and
K
nothing herein shall be construed to indicate that District will authorize or consent to any
future sale of such water.
7. The recitals herein are general background descriptions, but each and every
provision in the prior 2003 Agreement and the 2008 First Amendment to Agreement
between the parties, remains in full force and effect according to their terms, except as
herein expressly modified.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
effective on the day and year above set forth.
0k
4ttiy y�1
2.13.09
WOODBRIO(TE IR +� ATION DISTRICT
Attest:
..�... 'iii L�. �•�'
VVI tok's, President`"
Anders Christensen, Secretary
4ye�5 Y�•��~
;sok
CITY OF LOP;' A MUNICIPAL
y.1'1 k�
Attest:QPORATIOIy��ti�
S• 1, 1
1 tti�„ ti
4 , , Mayor
.. , City C jerk
APPROUT A�
�RM�'
Att e y
0k
4ttiy y�1
2.13.09
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCILAWARDING THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF
PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR SURFACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGERTO EXECUTETHE AGREEMENT, AND FURTHER
APPROPRIATING FUNDS
WHEREAS, at the April 4, 2007, City Council meeting, approval was given for HDR, Inc.,
of Folsom, California, to prepare the Surface Water Treatment Facility Conceptual Design and
Feasibility Evaluation, and the work was completed and presented to City Council on July 1,
2008, at a regular meeting; and
WHEREAS, this contract approval with HDR, Inc., authorizes the next step of preparing
the preliminary plans and the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) with the objective to qualify the
project for funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the federal
stimulus program; and
WHEREAS, an accelerated preliminary design/ElR process is proposed in order to meet
ARRA schedule requirements for the EIR to be completed within 12 months: and
WHEREAS, HDR, Inc., of Folsom, California, and partner West Yost & Associates, of
Davis, California, are highly qualified in the design of surface water treatment facilities: and
WHEREAS, the contract fee of $857,924 is within the range expected by Public Works
staff; and
WHEREAS, an appropriation of $987,000 is requested to cover the contract amount,
staff time required to administer the project, and contingencies to cover unexpected charges
during the preliminary engineering/EIR phase; and
WHEREAS, funding for the project will be provided by a loan from the Water Utility
Capital Fund (Infrastructure Replacement 181), with the ultimate funding source provided by the
sale of Woodbridge Irrigation District banked water.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby award
the professional services agreement for preparation of preliminary design and environmental
impact report for the Surface Water Treatment Facilityto HDR, Inc,, of Folsom, California, in the
amount of $857,924; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the
City Manager to execute the agreement; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that funds in the amount of $987,000 be a ppro priated from
the Water Utility Capital Fund (Infrastructure Replacement 181) for this project.
Dated: March 18, 2009
hereby certify that Resolution No. 2009-31 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City
Council in a regular meeting held March 18, 2009, by the following votes:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS—Johnson, Katzakian, and Mayor Hansen
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS— Hitchcock and Mounce
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS— None
�JO
City Clerk
2009-31
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT OF 2003 WATER
SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN WOODBRIDGE
IRRIGATION DISTRICTAND THE CITY OF LODI
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby
approve the Second Amendment to the 2003 Water Sale Agreement between
Woodbridge Irrigation District and the City of Lodi permitting the City of Lodi to sell a
portion of its banked water, as shown on ExhibitA attached hereto; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby authorize the
City Manager to execute the amendment.
Dated: March 18, 2009
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2009-32 was passed and adopted by the City
Council cf the City dE Lodi in a regular meeting held March 18, 2009, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS —Johnson, Katzakian, and Mayor Hansen
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock and Mounce
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS— None
JOHL
City Clerk
2009-32
r r
EX. �_ i __ ,
SECOND AMENDMENT TO 2003 AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF WATER
FROM WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT BY CITY OF LODI,
TO PERMIT LODI TO SELL PORTION OF ITS RANKED WATER
This agreement is entered into between the City of Lodi (City) and the
Woodbridge Irrigation District (District) this day of , 2009
Recitals
A. On May 13, 2003, City entered into a 40 -year Agreement with District for the
City's purchase of water from District entitled "Agreement for Purchase of Water from
the Woodbridge Irrigation District by the City of Lodi" (and,l 4inafter referred to as the
2003 Agreement). The Agreement provided for the City',s;pureYzase of a base supply of
6,000 acre-feet per annum (plus additional amounts on s"�'cified conditions), for a
payment commencing at $200 per acre-foot or $1,200;00.0 annually for; the base supply,
subject to later annual price adjustments, the water to be delivered to City' rom March I
through October 15. Under the Agreement, the :water must be used within "Cty':9 service
area, and City can not assign or transfer the right `t6 he water without the consent of the
District.
B. The 2003 Agreement provides for a ugl payments to'D strict whether or not the
water is used by City. Payments of $3:0Q{?0�Oyuarterly byC'' i?!to'District under the
Agreement commenced on October 1, 20Q3. ` Tlvater must'be treated. Plans far
treatment and use of the water from the D strict} ave 1'een;:delayed. City is preparing to
enter a contract with the;iir- i �af,HDR, Inc. in an amount"' f $2.9 million dollars for the
complete design, to 'a Ievel read for bidding oconstruction, of new treatment plant
works, which would treat..the water delivered by..Djstrict for use by the City customers.
No District water has been taken: or:used to dato'by the City under the 2003 Agreement.
C `Paragraph 8 :pf the 2 03_ Agreement provides that City can carry over and have
credit. for unused water during the initial three years, of up to 18,000 acre-feet, referred to
as "banked water" in the Agreement; for later delivery to City in subsequent years in
which District has water available "for such deliveries,
D. On January 17,.048, the parties entered into a First Amendment to the 2003
Agreement, which, among other things, extended the 40 -year term of the 2003
Agreement, an additional four years and five months, and which also extended City's
right to carry over and bank an additional 24,000 acre-feet of water that was unused by
the City up to October 15, 2010, thus giving City a right to bank a combined total of
42,000 acre-feet.
E. This Second Amendment to the 2003 Agreement is intended to provide
District's consent to City, working with the District's Manager, to pursue agreements to
sell up to 18,000 acre-feet of its first three years of banked water to others.
NOW, THEREFORE, WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND
THE CITY OF LODI AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. City may pursue, working v&h the District's Manager, a sale agreement or
agreements with others for their purchase during the years 2009,20 10 and 2011, of up to
6,000 acre-feet of water per year banked by the City, for a total of 18,000 acre-feet of
banked water if 1) in the year of sale District's Regulated Base Supply entitlement under
District's Agreement with EBMUD is a full 60,000 acre-feet, and if 2) the District is able
to make the water to be transferred available from its Regulated Base Supply for delivery
in the year of sale, as solely determined by District.. Any resulting agreement shall be
subject to the District's approval and the District shall be a party:`If District's Regulated
Base Supply is less than 60,000 acre-feet in any such year, Citi may pursue the sale of
not more than one-half of 6,000 acre-feet in such year subject to,the same terms and
conditions of availability. District will be unable to finally determine. whether District's
Regulated Base Supply is less than 60,000 acre-feet until -July 1 of ea c _,:year. District
shall have no responsibility or obligation to City if District cannot or doesnot make such
water available for transfer, or if any such transfer,;fails fonpy reason beyond the control
of District. However, City will retain its banked w4i- r rights:if the transfer does fail.
2. The sale price payable to L odi shall be not less tttan $200 per acre-foot, plus in
year 2011 the inflator factor which coibimences in that year'ir ahe 2003 Agreement. City
shall pay to District (in advance if requ6ted'lr District), all costs and expenses (legal,
engineering or otherwise), incurred or estimated b '...D strict be' incurred, in assisting
and/or implementing the sale by City.
3. District shall not be obligated to approve any sales that impose or potentially
impose any conditionsupon District's water rights or requirements upon District that are
unsatisfactory to District
4. ,City agrees that the City's proceeds of any such sale shall be used solely for
the planning, design and/or. constrUction of its p] armed treatment plant facilities or to
reimburse other City funds used for'such purposes,
5. City acknowledges the value and benefit to it of the District approving such
sales of water by the City pursuant to this Agreement, in that District itself could
undertake for its or�rbenefit to sell directly any surplus water it may have available
during the next three years. Nothing herein shall prevent or preclude District also selling
any surplus water that it has available in any such year above the amount sold by City, or
from selling any surplus District water if City fails to sell such water, or if City sells less
than 6,000 acre-feet, from selling any surplus water above the amount of water sold by
City.
6. This Agreement does not authorize or establish a precedent for District's
approval of any future sale by City of any banked water it may have under its 2003
Agreement with District, either beyond year 2011 or beyond 18,000 acre-feet, and
2
nothing herein shall be construed to indicate that District will authorize or consent to any
future sale of such water.
7 The recitals herein are general background descriptions, but each and every
provision in the prior 2003 Agreement and the 2008 First Amendment to Agreement
between the parties, remains in full force and effect according to their terms, except as
herein expressly modified.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
effective on the day and year above set forth.
2.13.09
3
WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Attest:
By
William Stokes, President
Anders Christensen, Secretary
CITY OF LODI, A MUNICIPAL
Attest:
CORPORATION
City Clerk
,Mayor
1PPROVED AS TO FORM:
`~- , . Att ne
2.13.09
3