The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - January 15, 1992 (54)rom AG. --'NDA TITLE: Special Allocation to Pay for Final Phase of uet>er•a ' Flan kht dale by Jones and Stokes Associates MEETING DATE: January 15, 1992 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENUED ACTION: That the City Council consider approving a Special Allocation in the amount of $14,705.54 to pay for the final phase of the General Flan Update by Jones and Stokes Associates. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In February, 1991 when the City Council last amended the General Plan Update contract with Jones and Stokes Associates. the consultant estimated that an additional 515,000 would be required to complete the final phases of work. The Community Development Department has received all of the outstanding invoices and the final amount is $14,705.54. FUNDING: 514,705.54 - Contingent Fund James fit.roe�er Community Development Director JBS/Jmp APPROVED THOMAS A PETERSON tacyct" P&PW ` City manna r C0UNC100/TXTA.02J/C0UNC0M cc -f CITY OF LODI SPECIAL ALLOCATION REQUEST TO: Finance Director DATE: January l5, 1992 FROM: City Clerk PROJECT NUMBER: Request is made for funds to accomplish the following project which was not included in the current budget: Description of Project Estimated Cost Final phase of General Plan Update by Jones and Stokes $14,705.54 Associates Account 110-045.01-323 (If you need more space, use additional sheet and attach to this form) Date of Approval - January 15, 1992 Amount Approved - $14,705.54 Council XXXXX City Manager FUND OR ACCOUNT TO BE CHARGED Current Budget $ Prior Year Reserve $ Contingent Fund $_ Capital Outly Reserve $_ Utility Outlay Reserve 5_ Hotel/Motel Tax Reserve - $ General Fund Operating Reserve $ General Fund Surplus $ Gas Tax Fund $ Other (Election) S /.c Dixon Dixon Flynn, lCe M. Heimcne Finance Director City Clerk Submit this form in duplicate to the Finance Director. Distribution after approval will be as follows: 1) Originating Department 2) Finance Department ..; TO: Finance Director FROM: City Clerk P! 4 f CITY OF LODI SPECIAL ALLOCATION REQUEST DATE: January 15, 1992 PROJECT NUMBER: 'o . o - 0,VS or - 3?_.J Request is made for funds to accomplish the following project which was not included in the current budget: Description of Project Estimated Cost Final phase of General Plan Update by Jones and Stokes $14,705.54 Associates Account #I0-045.01-323 (If you need more space, use additional sheet and attach to this form) Date of Approval - January 15, 1992 Amount Approved - $14,705.54 Council XXXXX City Manager FUND OR ACCOUNT TO BE CHARGED Current Budget S Contingent Fund $ Capital Outlay Reserve $ Utility Outlay Reserve $ Hotel/Rotel Tax Reserve - 5 Prior Year Reserve $ 111.70-t JV General Fund Surplus 5 General Fund Operating Reserve 5 ixn Flynh, Finance Director Gas Tax Fund $ Other (Election) $ A ic Reimche City Clerk Submit this form in duplicate to the Finance Director. Distribution after approval will be as follows: 1) Originating Department 2) Finance Department MEMORANDUM. City of Lodi. Conaunity Development Oepartment TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL. CITY MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY CLERK FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE-, MARCH 4, 1992 SUBJECT: 1989, 1990 AND 1991 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOCATIONS At a Special Session held on March 2, 1992 the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the staff's recmendation for the 1989. 1990 and 1991 Growth Management Allocations for single-family, medium density and high density residential uses. Enclosed is the report submitted to the Planning Commission. It consists of sheets showin ((1) the requested allocations by the developer or property owner; (2) the scoring summary using the adopted Growth Management point system; (3) the proposed 1989-1991 allocation schedule; (4) an allocation schedule showing 1992 as well as 1989-1991; (5) the estimated population as of September i of each year; and (6)maps depicting the various development projects. DEVEIA)PIN1E,NT PLAN ALLOCATICIN REQUESTS Low Density Allocations Requesied I'KOJECT 1 '89-.911 19921 1,on[ WEST 80 53 290 BANGS RANCH 104 0 BENNETT AND COMPTON 0 0 COLVIN RANCH 60 0 CENTURY MEADOWS 1 48 62 JOHNSON RANCH 2 73 100 CENTURY MEADOWS 4 81 36 TOWNE RANCH 10762 1 36 RRIDGEHAVEN 0 0 CENTURY MEADOWS 2 62 43 CENTURY MEADOWS 3 102 99 19931 19941 19951 19961TOTALS 189-191 74 58 25 1 290 1995 1996 TOTALS LODI WEST 0 0 0 0 57 0 57 MORIMOTOINEUHARTH 0 22 0 0 0 0 22 BANGS RANCH 1 36 0 01 0 1 0 0 36 RRIDGEHAVEN 1 50 0 01 0 1 0 1 0 150 PROJECT 189-191 19921 1993 1994 1995 1996 TOTALS LODI WEST 0 0 0 0 57 0 57 MORIMOTOINEUHARTH 0 22 0 0 0 0 22 BANGS RANCH 1 36 0 01 0 1 0 0 36 RRIDGEHAVEN 1 50 0 01 0 1 0 1 0 150 IIIrh Density Allocations RNuested BENNETT & COMPTON 721 721 01 01 0 Y2!921 GNIREQALLALS Development Plan Scoring Summary PROJECT CRITERIA A IB IC Dl ID2 D3 ID4 E fi G H l IJ TOTALS LODI WEST 5 7 200 10 8 S 0 0 111 01 0 301 284 MORIMOTO/NEUHARTH 7 0200, 7 10 10 10 0 101 0 0 20 10 284 BANGS RANCH 5 0200 5 10 13 10 0 151 0 0 IS 101 283 BENNEIT AND COMPTON 7 7 200 10 10 101 IO 4 101 0 7 1 15 Oi 283 COLVIN RANCH 5 0200 51 10 IQ 10 0 10 0 0 20 10 280 CENTURY MEADOWS 1 7 0 200 3 10 B 4 0 13 0 0 25 10 280 JOHNSON RANCH 2 5 0200 S 10 8 10 0 10 0 0 20 10 273 CENTURY MEADOWS 4 3 5 200 3 10 8 4 0 101 0 01 25 10 278 TOWNS RANCH 7 7 200 10 81 10 0 0 81 0 0 25 0 275 BR[DGEHAVEN 7 0.200' 7 101 10 10 0 10 0 0 20 0 274 CENTURY MEADOWS 2 3 0200 3 10 8 4 0 IO 0 0 25 10 273 CENTURY MEADOWS 3 3 0 200 3 10 8 4 01 0 0 025 191 273 ? SITE PLAN AND PROJECT DESIGN - BONUS POINTS FOR MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS -°' WILL BE AWARDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND SPARC. CDDDE-VCR,XI.S 2/27/92 PROPOSED BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE SINGLE FA1 HLY 65% PROJECT LODI WEST 1989 26 1990 27 1991 27 TOTAL '89-'91 $0 MORIMOTO/NEUHARTH 6 7 6 I9 BANGS RANCH 34 35 35 104 COLVIN RANCH 20 20 20 60 CENTURY MEADOWS 1 * 16 16 16 48 JOHNSON RANCH 2 43 43 43 129 CENTURY MEADOWS 4 29 29 29 87 TOWNE RANCH 35 36 36 107 CENTURY MEADOWS 2 * 25 26 25 76 CENTURY MEADOWS 3 * 24 24 25 73 RECOMMENDED ALLOC. 258 263 262 783 MAX. PERMITTED ALLOC. 258 263 262 783 UNUSED ALLOCATIONS o 01. 0 0 • ALLOCATIONS WERE. AWARDED FOR THE PORMN OF THE PROJECT IN MORfTY JWW ONE MEDIUM DENSITY 10% PROJECT 1989 0 1990 0 1991TOTAL 22 '89-'91 22 MORIMOTOINEUHARTH BANGS RANCH 18 18 0 36 BRIDGEHAVEN RECOMMENDED ALLOC 22 40 22 40 6 28 50 108 MAX. PERMITTED ALLOC. 40 40 40 120 UNUSED ALLOCA77ONS PROJECT ol 1989 ol 19901 12 1991 12 TOTAL '89-'91 BENNETT & COMPTON 99 45 0 144 RECOMMENDED ALLOC. 99 45 0 144 MAX. PERMITTED ALLOC. 99 101 101 301 UNUS'EDALLOCATIONS 0 56 101 157 3/2/92 GNIALLOCTALS PROPOSED BUILDING PERnIrr ALLOCATION SCIIEDULI SINGLE FAMILY 65% PROJECT 198911 1990 19 19911 LODI WEST 26 27 27 MORIMOTO/NEUHARTH 6 7 6 BAvGS RANCH 34 35 35 COLVIN RANCH 20 20 20 CENTURY MEADOWS 1 16 16 16 JOHNSON RANCH 2 43 43 43 CENTURY MEADOWS 4 29 29 29 TOWNE RANCH 35 36 36 CENTURY MEADOWS 2 * 25 26 25 CENTURY MEADOWS 3 * 24 24 25 RECOMMENDED ALLOC. 258 263 262 ; ` y 0 MAX. PERMITTED ALLOC. 258 263 262 120 UNUSED ALLOCATIONS 0 0 0 • ALLOCATIONS WERE AWARDED FOR THE PisRTKsN OF THE PROJECT W PRR*ICY AREA ONE. MEDIUM DENSITY 10% r0' 144 144 PROJECT1989 144 1990 1991 MORIMOTO/NEUHARTH 0 0 22 BANGS RANCH 18 18 0 BRIDGEHAVEN 22 22 6 RECOMMENDED ALLOC. 40 40 28 MAX. PERMITTED ALLOC. 40 40 40 UNUSED ALLOCATIONS 0 0 12 HIGH DENSITY 25% PROJECT 1989 1990 1991 BENNETT & COMPTON 99 45 0 RECOMMENDED ALLOC. 99 45 0 MAX. PERMITTED ALLOC, 99 101 101 UNUSED ALLOCATIONS 0 56 101 TOTAL '89•'91 1 REQ. '92H TOTAL '89-'9w 80 53 133 19 46. 65 104 0 104 60 0 60 48 0 48 129 44 173 87 30 117 107 :::62 169 76 29 105 73 29 102 783 293 1,076 783 267 1,050 0 ..26 TOTAL '89-'91 ;- REQ. '92 TOTAL '89-'92 22 :. Q:- 22 36 36 SD ; ` y 0 50 108 a 108 120 41 161 12 41 TOTAL '89-'91 :-'REQ: '92 TOTAL '89-'92 144 r0' 144 144 _` } _ fi 1'0 144 301 : :;,103 404 157 103 3/2/92 GMALLMALS City of Lo& ResidentW Gmwth Nlanegun mt Schatllk Adopwd: September Is. 1990 uodsr OnGaaacs 01521 Year Populatmm ® 2![ tl&W Pop. to be m ytrr lareoaai Hweeiali Total awiu per y+v Siasir Fam.® �*d de�ey 1 ��ydt �r a 657* 10% 23% 50,940 1,020 2.$72 397 254 f 40 99 S4p40 S2.MO 1,040 2.567 404 263 40 101 30"1 53.030 1.061 2.630 403 262 40 � lot 3ep-M 54.311 1,032 Fac. 2.630 41I 267 41 1a3 SOP93 55.193 1.104 1x.2.630 420 21 42 105 S" 56,297 1.]26 Fac. 2.630 428 :lit 43 107 Sep-" 57.473 1,149 Ea 2.630 437 284 44 104 SOP -96 58.571 133 Ea 2.630 445 289 45 111 X97 59,742 1.'_95 0x.2.630 4% 245 45 1I4 Sep -9i 60.937 1,219 FA- 2.630 463 ML 46 116 SOP-" 6L1$ 1.243 Fat. 7.630 473 307 47 Its SOt40 63,399 1.268 FaL 2.630 4s2 313 u 12t SOP -01 64,667 0,293 Fae.2.630 492 320 49 123 Sp -0R 65,960 1,319 m.2630 502 326 50 126 341-M 67.179 1,346 E a 2.330 512 333 SI 123 SaPM 63,623 1.377 Far.2.630 S22 339 52 131 SMP -w 69.998 1.400 Ea. 2.630 532 346 S3 133 301-0* 73.398 1.421 Sat. ;.630 543 353 54 t36 3"-w 72,326 1.457 FiL 2.630 554 360 55 139 Taula: 23,293 MA 8.874 vox 837 2.219 " Sap '89 pwWmim mm*w "mb 2C o(Ow po mk" di(h a etha '89 mL he "90 64444 to Jar '89 he '8! aro '90 popWatior wvmea ad pataowa pr baratram par Sala Derme"a of Fiwawes. 2J2 m C"ms6nl.XtS rC- AL- G l n: r• �' +u � I _ Y W rC- AL- p O N 14 � i ? •,err � ` � ��trts � t k t � �: •� •• 1 i t . 1 �+�r glove ,—% }0 O + a f I� s yl�r 1 fa t j, l rA V! �L4L4�� .cj i L;---- . i Aff Cos.— � �• may. Morimoto/Neuharth Development Pian 87 Sirg'e Famly Units Loch, CoMcmic k !� 33 $ � — ■ .:� Dial ■i|rov ■ 4 ' | . ; � U ■ ��§|!� � . % nit § ■ � � |■|| as $PJ '( ;=�� ■ r , gf� &�■# | | � . ■ n�; .i k !� 33 $ ■ ■� !� Dial ■i|rov ■ 4 ,p '.U, t•�' . ; � U ■ ��§|!� � . % nit § ■ � � |■|| $PJ '( .� �. | 33 $ ■ ■� !� Dial ■i|rov ■ 4 ;% uz§ ; � U ■ ��§|!� � . % nit § ■ � � |■|| | fritx ,0.,1 . w L4 u 4e P A[ 17-1M i t cANpL ' 1RR14A N 1060 f h r ►M /1 c7j k w Awe 6 r� El 0 E, ItA WOOLAKE NOJtTE, CONb041►Nfous F 3 At;P. t7 - 71 w i aFMY ?r'�EEr WOV40*6 iCN00( V Q V v - ift (p-�V! ft�ieCl"sJM Bennett & Compton sr.. .wua" tee.: • :.w. awrrtrw" AWT....i c+r� frm u curb Harr -ems• >�r . 4�LJ- ^�2 L&mar°li ..', go S"P S4% iAOY JL60 •. + "a. Z J �3• �A E i jam_ �� ; .s • 3 59 �'�� •�. � I t �dP .:.i�✓aWt� as sr , �,IpCa11tD 4. 38 RAfVW M a COURT y er e r s7—+a pt + ..,, 37 3! , ` i s ft 37 ser' 7 v • 111 ' 34 $4 41 ` r ' 9 ; , 46 IL 3 •• _i �—_� t 30 53 4= f �• r wx mom 1 43 ZLwr ' se 33 ff Ag ( rl ; f� Q 30 48 4 7 y y Q W •Zs � � � � . -.�_ � a •: � _.... / 19 ZC - Zt ' 2? -3• 74 I DEruciENLYT E FUTURE Colvim—Ropsh-- — —mss--•— 3y - ��k • s • 7 ,�yaa...r�r �. �• 1 r � fit u. k # r 1 • f►f rs•/i/rrir/ .r t k ^ 1 24 : Aim# i a 1 fiifarfry►f a �• 1 r � fit u. a �• 1 r � k # k � k a rrrt •aearr a s r � �. � , 1 r 11 I , ..titl/...► � y AND 19vosw*AV ------------------- • 1 , 2,•'' s 2 7L .,� ,/rr-- Jot reatrtl L L_ L l -sr1 rlrtr■a►sr R I J /,It1-I MII■IN17 v ....}n r.wwM�• 'IA7I f.A/N13 . zzs�P-,��aiS �•�-'2"a�iifRi _ffi' iz2iizstii■fit . .. .. ice.:.A .A........ Mery ..ears I\ I • i •. w! T • N Zb 2 r �i u4. w! T N Zb 2 r �i u4. .:r.V /!a 171 �J 4r' it .:r.V /!a 171 �J 4r' -k Sid; , !3 iV{ 2 qt Ic z S Q t41. 3 Ed � ♦ . f O I f f • • � 1 • • � • 3! '= O y s A � �� all • t H,17 '` 4 ttr• . irotrt rl �Z •,"j _ t Y ft: 3! '= O y s A � �� all (.110OMNijav liplu f]mr91 A.&F#W#O MO) - )pJM#OfO## VOW Lrr, -o na JN Y to w 41 4. � Kf3 (.110OMNijav liplu f]mr91 A.&F#W#O MO) - )pJM#OfO## VOW Lrr, -o na JN Y to w i s a s tj Bridgehaven a ,?oVri 9 M■&J?JVJ AOWP.%~ ___ _ _jo_ _ volt""_ _ �__ � t ■ � | } . � !lit ||tt| 2sum ,?oVri 9 M■&J?JVJ AOWP.%~ ___ _ _jo_ _ volt""_ _ �__ � t